Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.arch.embedded > #25792
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.arch.embedded |
| Subject | Re: Do you use FSMs or HSMs? |
| Date | Mon, 6 Feb 2017 23:24:14 -0600 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 34 |
| Message-ID | <o7bldp$vm0$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <o79gce$om1$1@dont-email.me> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Injection-Date | Tue, 7 Feb 2017 05:19:53 -0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="0c3f843cc7080b873602f174ef60d8b0"; logging-data="32448"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18gzp25Wi/y/KkWrPxx7QUV7F3UwOwK91I=" |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/49.0 SeaMonkey/2.46 |
| In-Reply-To | <o79gce$om1$1@dont-email.me> |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:D2ZqERZiEUEEhEK/qhx8nLG9K8Y= |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.arch.embedded:25792 |
Show key headers only | View raw
pozz wrote: > I often encounter many problems when I have to implement a "behaviour" > in a microcontrollor. For example, I have some analog/digital inputs and > some user commands. Based on that, the logic should set some outputs > (digital or analog). > > Most of the time you (the developer) must understand what is the good > behaviour of the machine, because noone is able to describe it in a good > way. I usually heard the sentence: when the user presses the ON button, > you switch on the engine. > After some short implementation, you understand that the engine should > be on only if the interlock input is closed. > And so on... > > I think the best method to describe a machine behaviour is a > state-machine, mainly a hierarchically state-machine (HSM). Do you agree? > It all depends. This being said, I do like state machines, mainly because they lend well to comprehensive unit/regression test suites and have some advantage in coverage measurement. Hierarchical may or may not help that much. > My post here is to understand if you really use HSMs to describe the > beahviour of the system you are coding and how do you implement them in > C or C++ (or whatever). > I have implemented them in multiple languages and programing paradigms. -- Les Cargill
Back to comp.arch.embedded | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Do you use FSMs or HSMs? pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2017-02-06 10:43 +0100
Re: Do you use FSMs or HSMs? Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2017-02-06 03:20 -0700
Re: Do you use FSMs or HSMs? Dave Nadler <drn@nadler.com> - 2017-02-06 06:38 -0800
Re: Do you use FSMs or HSMs? "QL" <80499@EmbeddedRelated> - 2017-02-06 08:56 -0600
Re: Do you use FSMs or HSMs? Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2017-02-06 12:13 -0700
Re: Do you use FSMs or HSMs? jim.brakefield@ieee.org - 2017-02-06 16:52 -0800
Re: Do you use FSMs or HSMs? Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2017-02-06 18:11 -0700
Re: Do you use FSMs or HSMs? Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2017-02-06 23:32 -0600
Re: Do you use FSMs or HSMs? pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2017-02-07 10:39 +0100
Re: Do you use FSMs or HSMs? John Speth <johnspeth@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-06 09:17 -0800
Re: Do you use FSMs or HSMs? Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2017-02-06 18:03 +0000
Re: Do you use FSMs or HSMs? Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2017-02-06 11:56 -0700
Re: Do you use FSMs or HSMs? Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2017-02-06 20:34 +0000
Re: Do you use FSMs or HSMs? Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2017-02-06 14:19 -0700
Re: Do you use FSMs or HSMs? Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2017-02-06 22:12 +0000
Re: Do you use FSMs or HSMs? Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2017-02-06 15:29 -0700
Re: Do you use FSMs or HSMs? Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2017-02-08 12:15 -0500
Re: Do you use FSMs or HSMs? Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2017-02-08 23:52 +0000
Re: Do you use FSMs or HSMs? Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2017-02-08 19:59 -0500
Re: Do you use FSMs or HSMs? Steve Watt <steve.removethis@Watt.COM> - 2017-02-17 00:30 +0000
Re: Do you use FSMs or HSMs? Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2017-02-17 00:44 +0000
Re: Do you use FSMs or HSMs? Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2017-02-07 10:12 +1100
Re: Do you use FSMs or HSMs? Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2017-02-06 23:36 -0600
Re: Do you use FSMs or HSMs? George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2017-02-07 03:15 -0500
Re: Do you use FSMs or HSMs? Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2017-02-10 17:41 -0600
Re: Do you use FSMs or HSMs? Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2017-02-07 19:56 +1100
Re: Do you use FSMs or HSMs? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-02-07 01:30 -0800
Re: Do you use FSMs or HSMs? Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2017-02-07 20:42 +1100
Re: Do you use FSMs or HSMs? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-02-07 02:46 -0800
Re: Do you use FSMs or HSMs? Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2017-02-08 00:27 +1100
Re: Do you use FSMs or HSMs? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-02-06 18:35 -0800
Re: Do you use FSMs or HSMs? Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2017-02-06 21:50 -0700
Re: Do you use FSMs or HSMs? Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2017-02-06 23:39 -0600
Re: Do you use FSMs or HSMs? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-02-06 23:20 -0800
Re: Do you use FSMs or HSMs? Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2017-02-10 17:47 -0600
Re: Do you use FSMs or HSMs? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-02-10 16:11 -0800
Re: Do you use FSMs or HSMs? Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2017-02-11 15:43 -0600
Re: Do you use FSMs or HSMs? Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2017-02-06 23:24 -0600
csiph-web