Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.arch.embedded > #21439

Re: Design pattern: refresh-based or event-based?

Show key headers only | View raw

pozz wrote:
> Il 21/07/2015 14:40, Hans-Bernhard Bröker ha scritto:
>> Well, you did post this to c.a.embedded, where we usually assume that
>> some degree of real-time constraint will be in place.  In the case of
>> your display update that means the system almost certainly _must_ be
>> able to handle the case where everything _does_ change, anyway, and
>> without breaking the timing constraints.  So if you must be able to do
>> it sometimes, it may well be better to just do it all the time, if only
>> to reduce the variation of CPU load caused by it, and to increase
>> overall predictability of the system's behaviour.
> 
> I got your point, but HMIs are't usually hard real-time systems. I could
> accept a short delay in opening a new screen (completely redraw of the
> display, think of opening an application on Windows), but I'd prefer to
> have a responsive interface after this time.
> 
> If I don't have a powerful graphical CPU, one solution to improve
> responsiveness could be to update on the display only the values that
> really change. Mostly if most of them change very slowly.

You were referring to a high-resolution TFT display, so you'll probably
have quite a lot of RAM (or are you building your screen like this
computer:
<https://events.ccc.de/congress/2012/Fahrplan/events/5178.en.html>? Then
you're in deep trouble :-). Lots of RAM means a processor with quite a
few bits and MHz, so redrawing a full screen of new values should be
well possible. It's only a few bitblts and fills; people were doing
full-screen 3-D with 66 MHz 486's 20 years ago.

Long story short: I would not optimize for minimum redraw, but for
simplicity. Probably not redraw the whole wallpaper each time, but every
gauge.


  Stefan

Back to comp.arch.embedded | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Design pattern: refresh-based or event-based? pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2015-07-21 10:02 +0200
  Re: Design pattern: refresh-based or event-based? upsidedown@downunder.com - 2015-07-21 11:37 +0300
    Re: Design pattern: refresh-based or event-based? pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2015-07-21 11:00 +0200
      Re: Design pattern: refresh-based or event-based? Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> - 2015-07-22 01:34 +0300
        Re: Design pattern: refresh-based or event-based? pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 06:57 +0200
          Re: Design pattern: refresh-based or event-based? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-07-21 23:02 -0700
            Re: Design pattern: refresh-based or event-based? pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 09:17 +0200
              Re: Design pattern: refresh-based or event-based? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-07-22 00:23 -0700
        Re: Design pattern: refresh-based or event-based? upsidedown@downunder.com - 2015-07-22 10:02 +0300
          Re: Design pattern: refresh-based or event-based? Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> - 2015-07-22 19:48 +0300
            Re: Design pattern: refresh-based or event-based? pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 09:04 +0200
              Re: Design pattern: refresh-based or event-based? Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> - 2015-07-23 10:29 +0300
                Re: Design pattern: refresh-based or event-based? raimond.dragomir@gmail.com - 2015-07-31 02:34 -0700
  Re: Design pattern: refresh-based or event-based? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2015-07-21 03:16 -0700
  Re: Design pattern: refresh-based or event-based? Hans-Bernhard Bröker <HBBroeker@t-online.de> - 2015-07-21 14:40 +0200
    Re: Design pattern: refresh-based or event-based? pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 07:01 +0200
      Re: Design pattern: refresh-based or event-based? Stefan Reuther <stefan.news@arcor.de> - 2015-07-22 18:30 +0200
        Re: Design pattern: refresh-based or event-based? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-07-22 10:55 -0700
  Re: Design pattern: refresh-based or event-based? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-07-21 08:26 -0700
    Re: Design pattern: refresh-based or event-based? pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 07:04 +0200
      Re: Design pattern: refresh-based or event-based? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-07-21 23:13 -0700
        Re: Design pattern: refresh-based or event-based? pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 09:24 +0200
          Re: Design pattern: refresh-based or event-based? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-07-22 08:26 -0700
            Re: Design pattern: refresh-based or event-based? pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 09:00 +0200
  Re: Design pattern: refresh-based or event-based? hamilton <hamilton@nothere.com> - 2015-07-21 14:07 -0600
    Re: Design pattern: refresh-based or event-based? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2015-07-21 13:12 -0700
  Re: Design pattern: refresh-based or event-based? Andrew Smallshaw <andrews@sdf.lonestar.org> - 2015-07-22 00:19 +0000
    Re: Design pattern: refresh-based or event-based? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-07-21 18:09 -0700
      Re: Design pattern: refresh-based or event-based? Andrew Smallshaw <andrews@sdf.lonestar.org> - 2015-07-22 21:18 +0000
        Re: Design pattern: refresh-based or event-based? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-07-22 23:17 -0700
    Re: Design pattern: refresh-based or event-based? pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 07:20 +0200
    Re: Design pattern: refresh-based or event-based? upsidedown@downunder.com - 2015-07-22 10:53 +0300
  Re: Design pattern: refresh-based or event-based? pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2015-07-22 07:32 +0200

csiph-web