Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.arch.embedded > #13049
| From | Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.arch.embedded |
| Subject | Re: Simple protocol analyzer? |
| Date | 2013-08-08 12:57 +0000 |
| Organization | PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC |
| Message-ID | <ku04jr$jur$1@reader1.panix.com> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <y_ydnU1gndpIpJzPnZ2dnUVZ5h2dnZ2d@giganews.com> <ktrge0$hrt$1@reader1.panix.com> <MdednQUFYega0pzPnZ2dnUVZ5vednZ2d@giganews.com> <ktv32q$gc4$1@dont-email.me> <87a9kswrr9.fsf@devereux.me.uk> |
On 2013-08-08, John Devereux <john@devereux.me.uk> wrote:
> Quite a nice environment for data manipulation, plotting etc.
>
><http://ipython.org/>
><http://matplotlib.org/>
><http://www.numpy.org/>
Python is brilliant for doing data analysis and visualization, and
there is a large scientific/engineering computing community. Back
when I did things like curve fitting and surface triangulation for
calibrating various sorts of sensors, I used Scientific Python and
SciPy (two different, somewhat competing, libraries). I higly
recommend both:
http://www.scipy.org/
https://sourcesup.renater.fr/projects/scientific-py/
FWIW, I found gnuplot-py to be easier to use for sophisticated plots
than matplotlib, but that's probably just because I already had 15
years experience using gnuplot:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/gnuplot-py/
http://gnuplot-py.sourceforge.net/
If you want everything all bundered together, Enthought provides
Python distributions bundled with a pretty complete set of scientific
and data visualization libraries:
https://www.enthought.com/
I haven't used it for a couple years, but it's especially nice if you
have to make something work on Windows. [If you're using a decent
Linux distro, then there should already be native packages for most of
what's included in Enthought's distribution.]
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! I KAISER ROLL?!
at What good is a Kaiser Roll
gmail.com without a little COLE SLAW
on the SIDE?
Back to comp.arch.embedded | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Simple protocol analyzer? Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.really> - 2013-08-06 11:54 -0500
Re: Simple protocol analyzer? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-08-06 17:17 +0000
Re: Simple protocol analyzer? Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.really> - 2013-08-06 13:00 -0500
Re: Simple protocol analyzer? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-08-06 18:48 +0000
Re: Simple protocol analyzer? Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.really> - 2013-08-06 14:33 -0500
Re: Simple protocol analyzer? Frank Buss <fb@frank-buss.de> - 2013-08-07 14:52 +0200
Re: Simple protocol analyzer? Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2013-08-07 08:06 -0500
Re: Simple protocol analyzer? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-08-07 14:48 +0000
Re: Simple protocol analyzer? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-08-07 23:25 -0400
Re: Simple protocol analyzer? John Devereux <john@devereux.me.uk> - 2013-08-08 08:44 +0100
Re: Simple protocol analyzer? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-08-08 12:57 +0000
Re: Simple protocol analyzer? Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2013-08-07 22:42 +1000
Re: Simple protocol analyzer? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-08-07 15:02 +0000
Re: Simple protocol analyzer? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2013-08-07 15:15 +0000
Re: Simple protocol analyzer? Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2013-08-08 08:50 +1000
csiph-web