Re: UART behavior for CTS/RTS - Kinetis bugs?

Path	csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From	Wolfgang Mahringer <yeti201@gmx.at>
Newsgroups	comp.arch.embedded
Subject	Re: UART behavior for CTS/RTS - Kinetis bugs?
Date	Fri, 28 Oct 2016 16:45:16 +0200
Lines	18
Message-ID	<e7h656FnfomU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<93dc2e49-2495-4149-8f09-305b9038f599@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Trace	individual.net pB8Dv9fFKXoC7zxpFMm24g5bd8hkTLMTApdY+vaWq5kNRG3R5u
Cancel-Lock	sha1:gy8e8hrAXu5GPuvpvnWNFC6X3jA=
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
In-Reply-To	<93dc2e49-2495-4149-8f09-305b9038f599@googlegroups.com>
Xref	csiph.com comp.arch.embedded:25261

Show key headers only | View raw

Hi Dave,

As others have pointed out, the current character in the transmitter
shift register is sent correctly.

Many years ago I had to deal with lots of modem datalinks, some also
with hardware handshaking.
I found, that one needs to expect up to *two* more characters after
asserting CTS. Usually, you get no or one more character, but be
prepared to get two.
I assumed this has to do with some internal buffers in the UART logic.

HTH
Wolfgang

-- 
From-address is spam trap
Use: wolfgang (dot) mahringer (at) sbg (dot) at

Thread

UART behavior for CTS/RTS - Kinetis bugs? Dave Nadler <drn@nadler.com> - 2016-10-27 13:21 -0700
  Re: UART behavior for CTS/RTS - Kinetis bugs? Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2016-10-27 13:41 -0700
    Re: UART behavior for CTS/RTS - Kinetis bugs? Dave Nadler <drn@nadler.com> - 2016-10-28 10:42 -0700
      Re: UART behavior for CTS/RTS - Kinetis bugs? Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2016-10-28 11:15 -0700
        Re: UART behavior for CTS/RTS - Kinetis bugs? Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2016-10-28 11:21 -0700
        Re: UART behavior for CTS/RTS - Kinetis bugs? antispam@math.uni.wroc.pl - 2016-10-29 00:17 +0000
          Re: UART behavior for CTS/RTS - Kinetis bugs? Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2016-10-28 19:28 -0700
            Re: UART behavior for CTS/RTS - Kinetis bugs? upsidedown@downunder.com - 2016-10-29 13:57 +0300
      Seriial ports on PCs. (was Re: UART behavior for CTS/RTS - Kinetis bugs?) Paul <paul@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk> - 2016-10-29 09:03 +0100
        Re: Seriial ports on PCs. (was Re: UART behavior for CTS/RTS - Kinetis bugs?) upsidedown@downunder.com - 2016-10-29 14:12 +0300
          Re: Seriial ports on PCs. (was Re: UART behavior for CTS/RTS - Kinetis bugs?) Paul <paul@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk> - 2016-10-30 09:34 +0000
  Re: UART behavior for CTS/RTS - Kinetis bugs? Tim Wescott <seemywebsite@myfooter.really> - 2016-10-27 16:39 -0500
    Re: UART behavior for CTS/RTS - Kinetis bugs? Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> - 2016-10-28 01:02 +0300
    Re: UART behavior for CTS/RTS - Kinetis bugs? lasselangwadtchristensen@gmail.com - 2016-10-27 15:31 -0700
    Re: UART behavior for CTS/RTS - Kinetis bugs? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-10-28 10:17 +0200
      Re: UART behavior for CTS/RTS - Kinetis bugs? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-10-28 14:23 +0000
        Re: UART behavior for CTS/RTS - Kinetis bugs? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-10-28 16:34 +0200
        Re: UART behavior for CTS/RTS - Kinetis bugs? Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2016-10-28 12:02 -0700
      Re: UART behavior for CTS/RTS - Kinetis bugs? Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2016-10-28 11:50 -0700
      Re: UART behavior for CTS/RTS - Kinetis bugs? upsidedown@downunder.com - 2016-10-29 01:51 +0300
        Re: UART behavior for CTS/RTS - Kinetis bugs? upsidedown@downunder.com - 2016-10-29 13:59 +0300
  Re: UART behavior for CTS/RTS - Kinetis bugs? Wolfgang Mahringer <yeti201@gmx.at> - 2016-10-28 16:45 +0200
  Re: UART behavior for CTS/RTS - Kinetis bugs? Hul Tytus <ht@panix.com> - 2016-10-28 22:28 +0000

csiph-web