Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.arch.embedded > #31523

Re: Another STM32F103 clone?

Path csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.arch.embedded
Subject Re: Another STM32F103 clone?
Date Sun, 08 Jan 2023 11:38:14 -0800
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Lines 6
Message-ID <87o7r8byvt.fsf@nightsong.com> (permalink)
References <tpddc3$1565$1@gioia.aioe.org>
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain
Injection-Info reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="33be2025e05b5255b68e5d3704684dd0"; logging-data="4124855"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18APfDOjNmIc7cZR3ZYGI2o"
User-Agent Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock sha1:Fh5LfDHAJQwCUAcvCARIB6fs9lU= sha1:kmrvkXT9W5MykTB0SyO1GlqheSE=
Xref csiph.com comp.arch.embedded:31523

Show key headers only | View raw

antispam@math.uni.wroc.pl writes:
> Most clones seem to use Cortex-M3.  GD has GD32E103 with Cortex-M4,
> but GD docs claim extra features, apparently not present in this chip.
> Does anybody heard of/seen chip with features above?

https://www.cnx-software.com/2022/08/12/4-9-can-bus-module-features-gd32e103-cortex-m4-microcontroller/  ?

Back to comp.arch.embedded | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Another STM32F103 clone? antispam@math.uni.wroc.pl - 2023-01-08 03:30 +0000
  Re: Another STM32F103 clone? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2023-01-08 11:38 -0800
    Re: Another STM32F103 clone? antispam@math.uni.wroc.pl - 2023-01-09 03:06 +0000
  Re: Another STM32F103 clone? antispam@math.uni.wroc.pl - 2023-01-09 23:23 +0000
    Re: Another STM32F103 clone? Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2023-01-09 17:38 -0700
      Re: Another STM32F103 clone? antispam@math.uni.wroc.pl - 2023-01-13 02:28 +0000
        Re: Another STM32F103 clone? Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2023-01-15 20:09 -0800
          Re: Another STM32F103 clone? antispam@math.uni.wroc.pl - 2023-01-17 00:43 +0000
            Re: Another STM32F103 clone? Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2023-01-16 19:39 -0700
              Re: Another STM32F103 clone? Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2023-01-16 19:44 -0700
            Re: Another STM32F103 clone? Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2023-01-16 21:07 -0800
              Re: Another STM32F103 clone? antispam@math.uni.wroc.pl - 2023-01-17 06:04 +0000
                Re: Another STM32F103 clone? Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2023-01-17 00:10 -0700
              Re: Another STM32F103 clone? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2023-01-17 13:48 +0100
                Re: Another STM32F103 clone? antispam@math.uni.wroc.pl - 2023-01-17 17:05 +0000
                Re: Another STM32F103 clone? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2023-01-17 19:42 +0100
            Re: Another STM32F103 clone? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2023-01-17 11:07 -0800
        Re: Another STM32F103 clone? Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2023-01-15 23:47 -0700
          Re: Another STM32F103 clone? antispam@math.uni.wroc.pl - 2023-01-17 05:41 +0000
            Re: Another STM32F103 clone? Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2023-01-17 00:04 -0700

csiph-web