Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.arch.embedded > #29664

Re: Tests in embedded

From Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.arch.embedded
Subject Re: Tests in embedded
Date 2020-05-16 02:04 -0700
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <87mu68tfm8.fsf@nightsong.com> (permalink)
References <r9o23d$9ln$1@dont-email.me> <m28shsbas6.fsf@mspro.home>

Show all headers | View raw

Mikko OH2HVJ <mikko.syrjalahti@nospam.fi> writes:
> Having hardware in the loop testing takes more work than pure software
> testing, but can certainly be done.

It helps if you simulate everything you can in the test system.  That
lets you test the main code on a normal computer with no special
hardware.  Of course that's not always feasible, and it doesn't help
much with testing the hardware you are simulating.

In general, yes, test automation is a huge win and is basically
mandatory these days.

Back to comp.arch.embedded | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Tests in embedded pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2020-05-16 08:43 +0200
  Re: Tests in embedded Mikko OH2HVJ <mikko.syrjalahti@nospam.fi> - 2020-05-16 10:26 +0300
    Re: Tests in embedded Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2020-05-16 02:04 -0700
      Re: Tests in embedded Mikko OH2HVJ <mikko.syrjalahti@nospam.fi> - 2020-05-16 20:08 +0300
        Re: Tests in embedded pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2020-05-16 20:51 +0200
          Re: Tests in embedded Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2020-05-17 09:35 +1000
          Re: Tests in embedded Mikko OH2HVJ <mikko.syrjalahti@nospam.fi> - 2020-05-17 11:26 +0300
      Re: Tests in embedded Dave Nadler <drn@nadler.com> - 2020-06-11 05:38 -0700

csiph-web