Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.arch.embedded > #28667
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> |
| Newsgroups | comp.arch.embedded |
| Subject | Re: H8S2676 faulty chips |
| Date | Sat, 08 Jun 2019 23:03:22 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 7 |
| Message-ID | <87lfybuwgl.fsf@nightsong.com> (permalink) |
| References | <bc370e5b-b85c-4a56-adf7-3b4904e03622@googlegroups.com> <qcmbkg$7ar$1@dont-email.me> <3a265bb9-4280-4343-86b5-028f208e1366@googlegroups.com> <qcp81d$bl4$1@news2.open-news-network.org> <qcr54q$2kj$1@gioia.aioe.org> <dsj*Wtfpx@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk> <9767a9be-64b7-48bd-b7bd-86f8ba25e044@googlegroups.com> <csj*5qPpx@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk> <db065587-4c84-4c1e-b3ae-f87b25cd6fb9@googlegroups.com> <503f0e44-5459-46ae-858a-27d2774a3c61@googlegroups.com> <54a1f9d8-7e63-4685-aa8d-b5b4d4066ebd@googlegroups.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain |
| Injection-Info | reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="c94d176a6ea1d57d23efb185ccb2a0e8"; logging-data="23018"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+IuX0hghpTHNUH9o9yQQx6" |
| User-Agent | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:yIVIIGxEvQWDTJR2zFobSlnrAEI= sha1:FAxHk6bEHnAqjth9zPujURg3tb0= |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.arch.embedded:28667 |
Show key headers only | View raw
xyman8@gmail.com writes: > However I guess the chance that they were made by a legitimate > manufacturer must be pretty slim as we wouldn't get 100% failure rate > if they were legitimate. Have you swapped a chip from an old, good board into one of your new failing boards? Did it work?
Back to comp.arch.embedded | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
H8S2676 faulty chips xyman8@gmail.com - 2019-05-29 01:23 -0700
Re: H8S2676 faulty chips Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> - 2019-05-29 19:22 +0300
Re: H8S2676 faulty chips xyman8@gmail.com - 2019-05-30 04:18 -0700
Re: H8S2676 faulty chips Mike Perkins <spam@spam.com> - 2019-05-30 19:39 +0100
Re: H8S2676 faulty chips Chris <xxx.syseng.yyy@gfsys.co.uk> - 2019-05-31 13:02 +0100
Re: H8S2676 faulty chips Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2019-05-31 17:18 +0100
Re: H8S2676 faulty chips xyman8@gmail.com - 2019-06-07 01:50 -0700
Re: H8S2676 faulty chips Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2019-06-07 12:56 +0100
Re: H8S2676 faulty chips xyman8@gmail.com - 2019-06-08 15:50 -0700
Re: H8S2676 faulty chips Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2019-06-08 17:44 -0700
Re: H8S2676 faulty chips Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2019-06-08 20:43 -0700
Re: H8S2676 faulty chips xyman8@gmail.com - 2019-06-08 22:40 -0700
Re: H8S2676 faulty chips Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2019-06-08 23:03 -0700
Re: H8S2676 faulty chips xyman8@gmail.com - 2019-06-08 23:08 -0700
Re: H8S2676 faulty chips Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2019-06-09 12:46 -0700
Re: H8S2676 faulty chips Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2019-06-09 12:53 -0700
Re: H8S2676 faulty chips Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> - 2019-06-09 13:27 -0700
Re: H8S2676 faulty chips Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2019-06-11 14:05 +0100
Re: H8S2676 faulty chips xyman8@gmail.com - 2019-06-12 01:11 -0700
Re: H8S2676 faulty chips Stef <stef33d@yahooI-N-V-A-L-I-D.com.invalid> - 2019-06-11 11:10 +0200
csiph-web