Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.arch.embedded > #24682
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> |
| Newsgroups | comp.arch.embedded, comp.dsp |
| Subject | Re: Labview vs. C++ |
| Date | Thu, 21 Jul 2016 12:13:19 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 9 |
| Message-ID | <87a8hadcts.fsf@jester.gateway.pace.com> (permalink) |
| References | <0_6dnR9yeqhRkg3KnZ2dnUU7-U8AAAAA@giganews.com> <nmp4aq$f8k$1@blue-new.rahul.net> <dsWdnUFsMJVUmwzKnZ2dnUU7-aGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain |
| Injection-Info | mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="52eac348160ce62b68e4635eee7cc854"; logging-data="21555"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/spNFnMEM0aeOvNgUvC4VY" |
| User-Agent | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:YYo0vt6k5aZXiL/bPKfDsdrv4vo= sha1:5qButDhBU0Ere43B2gk99pxouhY= |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.arch.embedded:24682 comp.dsp:32228 |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
Tim Wescott <seemywebsite@myfooter.really> writes: >> proposing to include a C++ program > They specifically don't want to pay for that -- there will be a Scilab > program, but that has run-times roughly comparable to Labview. I wonder if you could estimate without too much effort how much calculation is required, and then ask the customer to run a simple benchmark in Labview that calculates about that much, to see whether it can keep up.
Back to comp.arch.embedded | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Labview vs. C++ Tim Wescott <seemywebsite@myfooter.really> - 2016-07-20 18:57 -0500
Re: Labview vs. C++ spope33@speedymail.org (Steve Pope) - 2016-07-21 00:17 +0000
Re: Labview vs. C++ Tim Wescott <seemywebsite@myfooter.really> - 2016-07-21 12:30 -0500
Re: Labview vs. C++ spope33@speedymail.org (Steve Pope) - 2016-07-21 18:01 +0000
Re: Labview vs. C++ Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-21 12:13 -0700
Re: Labview vs. C++ Tim Wescott <seemywebsite@myfooter.really> - 2016-07-21 16:50 -0500
Re: Labview vs. C++ eric.jacobsen@ieee.org (Eric Jacobsen) - 2016-07-21 20:25 +0000
Re: Labview vs. C++ jim.brakefield@ieee.org - 2016-07-20 19:11 -0700
Re: Labview vs. C++ Marcel Mueller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> - 2016-07-21 07:37 +0200
Re: Labview vs. C++ "Nasser M. Abbasi" <nma@12000.org> - 2016-07-21 01:20 -0500
Re: Labview vs. C++ Jack <jack4747@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 07:11 -0700
Re: Labview vs. C++ George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2016-07-22 02:23 -0400
Re: Labview vs. C++ Jack <jack4747@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 07:08 -0700
Re: Labview vs. C++ Jack <jack4747@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 07:18 -0700
Re: Labview vs. C++ Tim Wescott <seemywebsite@myfooter.really> - 2016-07-21 12:37 -0500
Re: Labview vs. C++ John Speth <johnspeth@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-21 11:22 -0700
Re: Labview vs. C++ pippo2@disney.com (Jack) - 2016-07-21 23:38 +0200
Re: Labview vs. C++ Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2016-07-26 10:29 -0500
Re: Labview vs. C++ Paul Colin de Gloucester <Gloucester@nicht.At> - 2016-08-12 19:59 +0200
Re: Labview vs. C++ Mike Smith <email@domain.com> - 2016-09-07 20:54 +0100
csiph-web