Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.arch.embedded > #22617
| From | Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.arch.embedded, comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: Which scripting for embedded automation? |
| Date | 2015-11-29 23:02 -0800 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <871tb8dl78.fsf@jester.gateway.pace.com> (permalink) |
| References | <0e930740-22d8-4e2b-833f-bb5843437d0d@googlegroups.com> <87y4i6rvyc.fsf@jester.gateway.sonic.net> <motoev$eeu$1@dont-email.me> <87lhe5sciz.fsf@jester.gateway.sonic.net> <n3ea9n$k50$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> writes: > We have had similar discussions before. You criticize my possible > lack of experience with Python, then acknowledge your lack of > experience with Forth. So if you aren't really fluent with Forth, why > do you feel you are in a position to criticize it or even discuss it? No idea what possessed you to necro a 4 month old post but I've written a KLOC or so of Forth and studied the implementation techniques closely. That's not enough to have the instincts of an expert, but it's way beyond zero experience or newbie range. Plus I've read discussions between experts here on CLF and see the kind of stuff that they find difficult. So I have a reasonable sense of Forth's strong and weak points, it seems to me. Anyway, do you really want a scripting extension that requires an expert to be able to use it? You might give the MicroPython live demo a try: http://micropython.org/live/ (Hmm, it's not working right now, but it's really cool when it does). MicroPython needs around 100k of code space and 10k of ram from what I understand. That's less tiny than Forth can be, but still within range of cheap midrange MCU's including the 2 dollar ESP8266 boards. If not, NodeMCU definitely fits in those things (eLua instead of Python) and lots of them are shipping with it pre-installed.
Back to comp.arch.embedded | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Which scripting for embedded automation? abhishekkumardwivedi@gmail.com - 2015-07-23 02:24 -0700
Re: Which scripting for embedded automation? Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2015-07-23 12:18 -0500
Re: Which scripting for embedded automation? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2015-07-23 10:42 -0700
Re: Which scripting for embedded automation? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 15:08 -0400
Re: Which scripting for embedded automation? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 18:44 -0400
Re: Which scripting for embedded automation? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-07-23 22:00 -0700
Re: Which scripting for embedded automation? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 12:19 -0400
Re: Which scripting for embedded automation? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-07-24 10:15 -0700
Re: Which scripting for embedded automation? "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-24 23:06 +0000
Re: Which scripting for embedded automation? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2015-07-24 17:00 -0700
Re: Which scripting for embedded automation? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 20:52 -0400
Re: Which scripting for embedded automation? "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-28 18:06 +0000
Re: Which scripting for embedded automation? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-11-29 02:45 -0500
Re: Which scripting for embedded automation? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-29 23:02 -0800
Re: Which scripting for embedded automation? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-11-30 02:55 -0500
csiph-web