Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.arch.embedded > #22617

Re: Which scripting for embedded automation?

From Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.arch.embedded, comp.lang.forth
Subject Re: Which scripting for embedded automation?
Date 2015-11-29 23:02 -0800
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <871tb8dl78.fsf@jester.gateway.pace.com> (permalink)
References <0e930740-22d8-4e2b-833f-bb5843437d0d@googlegroups.com> <87y4i6rvyc.fsf@jester.gateway.sonic.net> <motoev$eeu$1@dont-email.me> <87lhe5sciz.fsf@jester.gateway.sonic.net> <n3ea9n$k50$1@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> writes:
> We have had similar discussions before.  You criticize my possible
> lack of experience with Python, then acknowledge your lack of
> experience with Forth.  So if you aren't really fluent with Forth, why
> do you feel you are in a position to criticize it or even discuss it?

No idea what possessed you to necro a 4 month old post but I've written
a KLOC or so of Forth and studied the implementation techniques closely.
That's not enough to have the instincts of an expert, but it's way
beyond zero experience or newbie range.  Plus I've read discussions
between experts here on CLF and see the kind of stuff that they find
difficult.  So I have a reasonable sense of Forth's strong and weak
points, it seems to me.  Anyway, do you really want a scripting
extension that requires an expert to be able to use it?

You might give the MicroPython live demo a try:

   http://micropython.org/live/

(Hmm, it's not working right now, but it's really cool when it does).

MicroPython needs around 100k of code space and 10k of ram from what I
understand.  That's less tiny than Forth can be, but still within range
of cheap midrange MCU's including the 2 dollar ESP8266 boards.  If not,
NodeMCU definitely fits in those things (eLua instead of Python) and
lots of them are shipping with it pre-installed.

Back to comp.arch.embedded | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Which scripting for embedded automation? abhishekkumardwivedi@gmail.com - 2015-07-23 02:24 -0700
  Re: Which scripting for embedded automation? Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2015-07-23 12:18 -0500
  Re: Which scripting for embedded automation? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2015-07-23 10:42 -0700
  Re: Which scripting for embedded automation? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 15:08 -0400
    Re: Which scripting for embedded automation? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 18:44 -0400
  Re: Which scripting for embedded automation? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-07-23 22:00 -0700
    Re: Which scripting for embedded automation? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 12:19 -0400
      Re: Which scripting for embedded automation? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-07-24 10:15 -0700
        Re: Which scripting for embedded automation? "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-24 23:06 +0000
          Re: Which scripting for embedded automation? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2015-07-24 17:00 -0700
            Re: Which scripting for embedded automation? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 20:52 -0400
          Re: Which scripting for embedded automation? "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-28 18:06 +0000
        Re: Which scripting for embedded automation? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-11-29 02:45 -0500
          Re: Which scripting for embedded automation? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-29 23:02 -0800
            Re: Which scripting for embedded automation? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-11-30 02:55 -0500

csiph-web