Groups > ba.general > #1954

Re: Another 'rare' event occurs in San Jose

References	(5 earlier) <s_ydnfO_3Ph4TTP9nZ2dnUU7-VednZ2d@westnet.com.au> <dqktagto5d62lu4ms5be22qa7gvjgcfq6t@4ax.com> <s8o5j4$rjl$3@dont-email.me> <188vag9pbga06uuapkbaspdii704lidr8e@4ax.com> <ezPrI.636936$nn2.635318@fx48.iad>
Subject	Re: Another 'rare' event occurs in San Jose
Message-Id	<20210527.230514.99481193@mixmin.net>
Date	2021-05-27 23:05 +0100
From	Rudy Canoza Condom Inspector <remailer@domain.invalid>
Newsgroups	talk.politics.guns, ba.general, ba.politics, ca.general, ca.environment
Organization	dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

>
> On Thu, 27 May 2021 10:14:03 -0600, in talk.politics.guns Just
> Wondering <JW@jw.com> wrote:
>
>>> TTBOMK, the San Jose transit shooter's gun hasn't been publicly
>>> identified yet; however, I'll give strong odds that it turns out 
to be
>>> an assault rifle.
>>> They virtually *always* do, today.
>>> How much you wanna bet?
>>
>>You are confusing "assault rifle" with "assault weapon".
>>The terms are not synonymous, they are not interchangeable.
>
> Thus is your opinion.  It happens to differ from my opinion; 
however,
> I respect your right to your opinion as strongly as I demand my 
right
> to mine.
>
> I also think it's so trivial of a point as to be not worth 
debating.

Every point is worth debating.  To death if necessary.

Back to ba.general | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Another 'rare' event occurs in San Jose Rudy Canoza Condom Inspector <remailer@domain.invalid> - 2021-05-27 23:05 +0100

csiph-web