Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > aus.services.defence > #31

Re: Dolt has impure thoughts (if any) at ANZAC Day dawn service

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

DOLF: "Can the Chinese word #391 - zhì (志): A TREATISE; ASPIRATIONAL 
DETERMINATION OF WILL be nuanced to include a MANIFESTO which conveys a 
person's political intention of will?"

-- NATURE'S CALLING --

"WELL, WELL SO IT'S TRUE.
THAT THE RAPACIOUS WOLF,
WASN'T THEN PEPE LA POO
DID TELL US SO HIMSELF.

WHILST RUSHING BY LOOKING,
FOR A REAL MEN'S LOO STALL.
A TROLL, HIDEOUSLY CACKLING.
ANSWERING NATURE'S CALL."

{@11: Sup: 36 - STRENGTH: CH'IANG (#404 - homótechnos (G3673): 
PRACTISING THE SAME TRADE OR CRAFT | methodeía (G3180): CUNNING ARTS; 
TRICKERY | mesouránēma (G3321): THE HIGHEST POINT IN THE HEAVENS, WHICH 
THE SUN OCCUPIES AT NOON → TETRA #81 x 4.5 DAYS EXHIBIT THIS 
CHARACTERISTIC); Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#391 - zhì (志): A TREATISE; 
ASPIRATIONAL DETERMINATION OF WILL | arnéomai (G720): TO DENY SOMEONE | 
episýstasis (G1999): HOSTILE BANDING TOGETHER → #2515 - synistáō 
(G4921): *COMPOSE* [#1336 - RATIONALITY, #931 - INNER BEING, #248 - 
RULER OF NATURE] )}

#1640 - zhì tóng dào hé (志同道合): to sing the same song with somebody; to 
be of kindred spirits with somebody; to have a common goal; to be in the 
same camp; to cherish the same ideals and take the same course; like-minded"

REAL Tall Henry @ 0727 HRS ON 27 APRIL 2026: "The stupid ape actually 
donated $25 to hideous, cackling, mixed species, half-breed shitskin 
Camela Harris' campaign!"

For the purpose of a more professional opinion on whether the "SIMIAN 
MONKEY MURAL ADVANCING IRISH REPUBLICANISM IS (κακότεχνος) DEGENERATE 
ART?" we again conveyed several emails @ 0630 to 0809 HOURS ON 14 
OCTOBER 2024 sketching out our INFORMAL RESEARCH conundrums to DOCTOR 
JASON TUCKWELL of WESTERN SYDNEY UNIVERSITY:

"Drawing on elements of Aristotle’s depiction of technē, JASON TUCKWELL 
offers an account of artistic production embedded in the work of 
continental philosophers and an eclectic array of theoretical 
mathematicians and evolutionary theorists. TUCKWELL demonstrates 
familiarity with the Aristotelian corpus throughout the text; specific 
references, however, are often relegated to endnotes. Moreover, the 
liberties TUCKWELL admits he takes with Aristotle may put off some 
readers from the start. For example, he explains that his argument 
requires that he “diverge from Aristotle for whom technē is a rational 
faculty”. The elements of Aristotle’s philosophy that most inform 
TUCKWELL’S discussion are the distinctions between technē and epistēmē 
(ie #369 - themélios (G2310): INSTITUTION OR SYSTEM OF TRUTH) and the 
relationships between nature and material and efficient causality. The 
result is a dense read, likely to have the most appeal to those whose 
intellectual commitments are grounded less in ancient philosophy than in 
continental/postmodern thought."

Since you are well acquainted with the problem of aesthetics and techne 
in the creation and the function of art, I'm wondering at your opinion 
on IRISH REPUBLICANISM AS (κακότεχνος) DEGENERATE ART?

diān fù (顛覆): 1. to topple (i.e. knock over); 2. to capsize; 3. fig. 
*TO* *OVERTURN* (*A* *REGIME*, *BY* *PLOTTING* *OR* *SUBVERSION*); 4. to 
undermine; 5. to subvert

<https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&glyph:顛>

#276 = [#1, #7, #21, #35, #36, #42, #62, #72]

diān (顛): 1. top; apex, 2. head, 3. forehead, 4. basis, 5. Dian, 6. to 
shake, 7. to fall; to drop, 8. to turn upside down, 9. *TO* *BE* 
*CRAZY*, 10. *TO* *MAKE* *A* *DISTURBANCE*; *TO* *SHOUT* *AND* *SCREAM*

#77 = [#1, #6, #16, #54]

fù (覆): 1. to cover, 2. to reply [to a letter], 3. to overturn; to 
capsize, 4. layered, 5. *TO* *RUIN*; *TO* *DESTROY*; *TO* *OVERWHELM*, 
6. to hide, 7. to scrutinize, 8. *TO* *THE* *CONTRARY*, 9. again, 10. to 
reverse; to return, 11. *TO* *AMBUSH*

#353 = [#1, #7, #21, #35, #36, #42, #62, #72, #1, #6, #16, #54]

#207 - REDUCTIO AD HILTERUM TABLE TALK ON 23 SEPTEMBER 1941 AS IDEA #23 
= [#12, #14, #16, #11, #13, #8, #10, #20, #2, #5, #24, #2, #15, #20, #3, 
#32]

#11, {@4: Sup: 53 - ETERNITY: YUNG (#133 - hǔ (虎): *TIGER*); Ego: 11 - 
DIVERGENCE: CH'A (#53)}

#13, {@5: Sup: 66 - DEPARTURE: CH'U (#199 - qiáng (彊): *STRONG*); Ego: 
13 - INCREASE: TSENG (#66)}

#8, {@6: Sup: 74 - CLOSURE: CHIH (#273 - sǐ (死): *DEATH*); Ego: 8 - 
OPPOSITION: KAN (#74)}

#10, {@7: Sup: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#276 - diān (顛): *HEAD*; *INSANE* 
*BEHAVIOUR* --> #353 - diān  (顛覆): *SUBVERT*; *OVERTHROW*); Ego: 10 - 
DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#84 - lì (曆): *CALENDAR* *SCIENCE*)}

#20, {@8: Sup: 23 - EASE: YI (#299 - míng (鳴): *LEAK* *A* *SECRET*); 
Ego: 20 - ADVANCE: CHIN (#104 - Háng (杭): TO CROSS A STREAM --> 
alternate form kàng (抗): TO RESIST; OPPOSE)}

#353 - GRAFFITI *PHALLUS* FUN @ 1151 HOURS ON 20 NOVEMBER 2017 as [#50, 
#3, #300] /
#1409 - ONTIC TOTAL: #104 as [#6, #400, #3, #300, #700] = nâgash 
(H5066): {UMBRA: #353 % #41 = #25} 1) to draw near, approach; 1a) (Qal) 
to draw or come near; 1a1) of humans; i) *OF* *SEXUAL* *INTERCOURSE*; 
1a2) of inanimate subject; i) to approach one another; 1a3) (Niphal) to 
draw near; 1a4) (Hiphil) *TO* *CAUSE* *TO* *APPROACH*, *BRING* *NEAR*, 
*BRING*; 1a5) (Hophal) to be brought near; 1a6) (Hithpael) to draw near;

INTERNET STALKING (RELIGIOUS HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES BY ANTI-RELIGIONISTS): 
SCREAMING.NUTBAG@gmail.com

{@7: Sup: 80 - LABOURING: CH'IN (#293 x 365.2423 = 107,016 or #2184 x 49 
or #294 x 364 as KOSMOS NORM); Ego: 23 - EASE: YI (#242 - qôwph (H6971): 
*APE*)}



<https://www.grapple369.com/images/Screaming-Nutbag.jpeg>

<https://www.grapple369.com/images/Simian%20Monkey%2020170615.jpeg>

#186 as [#100, #6, #80] /
#242 as [#6, #100, #6, #80, #10, #40] = qôwph (H6971): 1) *APE*;

TUCKWELL begins with the premise that contemporary aesthetic theory 
continues to view the work of art as an “object for ideal 
contemplation”. In contrast, technē is the “power of the particular,” 
which, he asserts, has nothing to do with imitating a form. Chapter One 
argues that technē performs a radical critique of epistēmē. Entitled 
“Functions and Models,” the chapter posits that technē redefines the 
conventional paradigm of problem formation whereby “the value of a 
problem often concerns how well it anticipates its own resolution”. 
Under the sign of technē, problems are not there to be solved: “problems 
are approached via their inherently productive and generative 
properties—they create and disgorge differences” [Review by Janet M. 
Atwill, University of Tennessee 
<https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2019/2019.05.32>]

COPILOT @ 1002 HRS ON 27 APRIL 2026: "Yes — 志 (zhì) can be legitimately 
nuanced to include the sense of a manifesto, provided the emphasis is on 
declared intention, aspirational will, and programmatic purpose.** The 
character does not natively mean “manifesto” in the narrow 
modern-political sense, but its semantic field strongly supports such an 
extension when framed as an articulated will or treatise of intention.

🧭 1. CORE SEMANTIC RANGE OF 志 (zhì)
Across authoritative lexicographic sources, 志 consistently denotes:
	•	Aspiration / ambition / will — the inner orientation of purpose.
	•	Determination / resolve — the volitional force that sustains action.
	•	Record / treatise / written note — especially in the traditional form 
誌, meaning “to record; to write down; a treatise-like record.”

This dual structure — inner will (心) + scholarly articulation (士) — is 
built into the character’s etymology as a phonosemantic compound where 心 
provides meaning and 士 provides sound. Thus, 志 already fuses intention 
with formal inscription.

🧩 2. WHY 志 CAN SUPPORT THE SENSE OF “MANIFESTO”
A manifesto is, structurally, a public document that:
	0.	Declares intention
	0.	Articulates a program of action
	0.	Expresses a normative or aspirational will
	0.	Fixes that will in written form

These four elements map directly onto the semantic components of 志:
	•	志 = aspiration / ambition / will → the intentional core of a manifesto.
	•	誌 = record / treatise → the formal inscription of that intention.

Because the character historically covers both inner volition and 
written articulation, extending 志 to denote a manifesto is not a 
distortion but a structurally faithful semantic extension.

🏛 3. PRECEDENT IN COMPOUND USAGE
Several compounds show 志 functioning as a publicly oriented declaration 
of will, which is close to the manifesto genre:
	•	明志 (to demonstrate one’s sincere convictions) — a public declaration 
of principle.
	•	立志 (to set one’s resolve) — establishing a programmatic intention.
	•	壮志 (great goal; magnificent aspiration) — large-scale, often 
political or civilizational aims.

These do not mean “manifesto” per se, but they show that 志 naturally 
gravitates toward public, programmatic, aspirational articulation.

🧱 4. limits and precision
	•	Chinese has no single classical term that maps exactly to the modern 
Western political concept of “manifesto.”
	•	If precision is required, compounds such as 宣言 (xuānyán: declaration) 
or 纲领 (gānglǐng: program/ platform) are more standard.
	•	But within a symbolic, philosophical, or operator-based framework 
(such as your #153 MANIFESTO / #19 𝌘從 thesis), 志 is semantically 
legitimate as the operator of “aspirational will crystallized into 
written form.”

🔶 5. SYNTHESIS FOR YOUR FRAMEWORK
Within your liminological operator grammar, 志 can function as the node 
where intention becomes inscription — the moment where will crosses the 
threshold into articulated form. This is precisely the structural 
function of a manifesto. Thus: 志 = the volitional vector of intention + 
its formal inscription = a structurally valid carrier for “manifesto” as 
political will made explicit.

A QUESTION TO REFINE YOUR OPERATOR MAPPING
Would you like to differentiate 志 (aspirational will) from 宣 
(proclamation) and 言 (speech-act) in your schema, or do you intend 志 to 
subsume the declarative function as well?"

REAL Tall Henry @ 0837 HRS ON 27 APRIL 2026: "Pope Benedict XVI knew of 
abusive priests when he ran Munich archdiocese, but failed to act. 
[omitted reference to CNN report 20 JANUARY 2022]"

On 27/4/2026 07:27, REAL Tall Henry wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Apr 2026 06:53:22 +1000, dolt <doltboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Allen also referred to himself as a US and said he is “no longer willing
>> to permit a pedophile, rapist, and traitor to coat my hands with his
>> crimes.” He added that he aimed to limit casualties, saying he would
>> only target Secret Service agents “if necessary” and would avoid harming
>> guests and staff unless forced to do so.
> 
> The stupid ape actually donated $25 to hideous, cackling, mixed
> species, half-breed shitskin Camela Harris' campaign!
> 
> <b'ris>

<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Physician%20Heal%20Thyself%2020260416.pdf>

-- 
Check out our SAVVY module prototype that facilitates a movable / 
resizable DIALOG and complex dropdown MENU interface deploying the third 
party d3 library.

<http://www.grapple369.com/>

Back to aus.services.defence | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Dolf has impure thoughts at ANZAC Day dawn service Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2026-04-24 02:04 +0200
  Re: Dolf has impure thoughts at ANZAC Day dawn service dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2026-04-24 11:31 +1000
    Re: Dolf has impure thoughts at ANZAC Day dawn service dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2026-04-24 14:40 +1000
      Re: Dolf has impure thoughts at ANZAC Day dawn service dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2026-04-24 21:02 +1000
        Re: Dolt has impure thoughts (if any) at ANZAC Day dawn service REAL Tall Henry <not@home.org> - 2026-04-25 15:36 +0100
          Re: Dolt has impure thoughts (if any) at ANZAC Day dawn service REAL Tall Henry <not@home.org> - 2026-04-25 14:54 +0000
    Re: Dolf has impure thoughts at ANZAC Day dawn service dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2026-04-27 05:47 +1000
      Re: Dolf has impure thoughts at ANZAC Day dawn service dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2026-04-27 06:53 +1000
        Re: Dolt has impure thoughts (if any) at ANZAC Day dawn service REAL Tall Henry <not@home.org> - 2026-04-26 22:27 +0100
          Re: Dolt has impure thoughts (if any) at ANZAC Day dawn service REAL Tall Henry <not@home.org> - 2026-04-26 22:37 +0000
          Re: Dolt has impure thoughts (if any) at ANZAC Day dawn service dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2026-04-27 11:05 +1000
            Re: Dolt has impure thoughts (if any) at ANZAC Day dawn service REAL Tall Henry <not@home.org> - 2026-04-27 13:18 +0100
              Re: Dolt has impure thoughts (if any) at ANZAC Day dawn service REAL Tall Henry <not@home.org> - 2026-04-27 17:04 +0000
                Re: Dolt has impure thoughts (if any) at ANZAC Day dawn service Susan Cohen <thickIrish@cunt.inv> - 2026-04-27 13:36 -0400
                Re: Dolf has impure thoughts (if any) at ANZAC Day dawn service dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2026-04-27 17:43 +0000
                Re: Dolf has impure thoughts (if any) at ANZAC Day dawn service dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2026-04-28 09:07 +1000
                Re: Dolf has impure thoughts (if any) at ANZAC Day dawn service dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2026-04-28 13:50 +1000
                Re: Dolf has impure thoughts (if any) at ANZAC Day dawn service dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2026-04-28 17:45 +1000
                Re: Dolf has impure thoughts (if any) at ANZAC Day dawn service dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2026-04-28 16:27 +0000
                Re: Dolt has impure thoughts (if any) at ANZAC Day dawn service Susan Cohen <thickIrish@cunt.inv> - 2026-04-27 18:34 +0000
                Re: Dolf has impure thoughts (if any) at ANZAC Day dawn service dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2026-04-27 20:18 +0000
      Re: Dolf has impure thoughts at ANZAC Day dawn service dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2026-04-27 07:05 +1000

csiph-web