Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > aus.electronics > #35657 > unrolled thread

OT: Pedestal fan purchase

Started bySylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>
First post2023-12-07 21:58 +1100
Last post2023-12-09 04:52 +1100
Articles 20 on this page of 43 — 9 participants

Back to article view | Back to aus.electronics


Contents

  OT: Pedestal fan purchase Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-12-07 21:58 +1100
    Re: OT: Pedestal fan purchase Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2023-12-07 22:05 +1100
      Re: OT: Pedestal fan purchase Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-12-07 22:54 +1100
        Re: OT: Pedestal fan purchase Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2023-12-07 22:58 +1100
        Re: OT: Pedestal fan purchase not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2023-12-08 06:17 +1000
          Re: OT: Pedestal fan purchase Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-12-08 11:03 +1100
    Re: OT: Pedestal fan purchase "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-12-08 04:09 +1100
      Re: OT: Pedestal fan purchase Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2023-12-08 07:03 +1100
      Re: OT: Pedestal fan purchase Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-12-08 08:11 +1100
        Re: OT: Pedestal fan purchase not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2023-12-08 07:26 +1000
          Re: OT: Pedestal fan purchase Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2023-12-08 10:59 +1100
            Re: OT: Pedestal fan purchase Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-12-08 11:06 +1100
              Re: OT: Pedestal fan purchase Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2023-12-08 10:56 +1000
              Re: OT: Pedestal fan purchase Peter Jason <pj@jostle.com> - 2023-12-08 13:21 +1100
              Re: OT: Pedestal fan purchase "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-12-09 04:58 +1100
            Re: OT: Pedestal fan purchase Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2023-12-08 12:26 +1100
              Re: OT: Pedestal fan purchase Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2023-12-08 15:03 +1100
            Re: OT: Pedestal fan purchase Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2023-12-08 16:18 +1000
              Re: OT: Pedestal fan purchase Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-12-08 21:43 +1100
                Re: OT: Pedestal fan purchase Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2023-12-09 09:25 +1100
                  Re: OT: Pedestal fan purchase "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-12-09 19:15 +1100
            Re: OT: Pedestal fan purchase "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-12-09 04:55 +1100
              Re: OT: Pedestal fan purchase Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2023-12-09 11:48 +1100
                Re: OT: Pedestal fan purchase Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2023-12-09 13:05 +1100
                  Re: OT: Pedestal fan purchase Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2023-12-09 19:18 +1100
                  Re: OT: Pedestal fan purchase "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-12-09 19:19 +1100
                Re: OT: Pedestal fan purchase "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-12-09 19:18 +1100
                  Re: OT: Pedestal fan purchase Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2023-12-09 19:19 +1100
                    Re: OT: Pedestal fan purchase "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-12-10 04:45 +1100
                      Re: OT: Pedestal fan purchase Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2023-12-10 12:47 +1100
                        Re: OT: Pedestal fan purchase "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-12-10 19:14 +1100
                          Re: OT: Pedestal fan purchase Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2023-12-10 19:30 +1100
                            Re: OT: Pedestal fan purchase Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-12-10 21:52 +1100
                              Re: OT: Pedestal fan purchase Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2023-12-10 22:22 +1100
                            Re: OT: Pedestal fan purchase "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-12-11 04:54 +1100
          Re: OT: Pedestal fan purchase Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-12-08 11:07 +1100
            Re: OT: Pedestal fan purchase Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2023-12-08 12:12 +1100
            Re: OT: Pedestal fan purchase Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2023-12-08 15:46 +1100
              Re: OT: Pedestal fan purchase Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2023-12-08 19:34 +1100
                Re: OT: Pedestal fan purchase Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2023-12-08 20:20 +1100
            Re: OT: Pedestal fan purchase Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2023-12-08 16:23 +1000
            Re: OT: Pedestal fan purchase "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-12-09 04:59 +1100
        Re: OT: Pedestal fan purchase "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2023-12-09 04:52 +1100

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →


#35657 — OT: Pedestal fan purchase

FromSylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>
Date2023-12-07 21:58 +1100
SubjectOT: Pedestal fan purchase
Message-ID<ktdmrjFk2vgU2@mid.individual.net>
I bought an Arlec pedestal fan yesterday. When I got it home I noticed 
that it claimed "DC motor technology". Turns out that instead of a mains 
lead, it has a plug-pack that connects to it.

Anyway, I assume their motive for this change is cost, so we may see it 
in other models/brands. Something to watch out for.

As it happened, a part was missing, and I was able to return it for a 
refund.

Sylvia.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#35658

FromXeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au>
Date2023-12-07 22:05 +1100
Message-ID<ktdn78Fj3vpU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#35657
On 7/12/2023 9:58 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
> I bought an Arlec pedestal fan yesterday. When I got it home I noticed 
> that it claimed "DC motor technology". Turns out that instead of a mains 
> lead, it has a plug-pack that connects to it.

Was that one of those remote controlled ones?
> 
> Anyway, I assume their motive for this change is cost, so we may see it 
> in other models/brands. Something to watch out for.

More like easy compliance with Aus electrical standards.
> 
> As it happened, a part was missing, and I was able to return it for a 
> refund.

Lucky!
> 
> Sylvia.
> 

-- 
Xeno


Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
       (with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#35659

FromSylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>
Date2023-12-07 22:54 +1100
Message-ID<ktdq3iFlff7U1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#35658
On 07-Dec-23 10:05 pm, Xeno wrote:
> On 7/12/2023 9:58 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
>> I bought an Arlec pedestal fan yesterday. When I got it home I noticed 
>> that it claimed "DC motor technology". Turns out that instead of a 
>> mains lead, it has a plug-pack that connects to it.
> 
> Was that one of those remote controlled ones?

Yes, though that wasn't why I bought it.
Sylvia.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#35660

FromXeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au>
Date2023-12-07 22:58 +1100
Message-ID<ktdqbuFj3vpU3@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#35659
On 7/12/2023 10:54 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
> On 07-Dec-23 10:05 pm, Xeno wrote:
>> On 7/12/2023 9:58 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
>>> I bought an Arlec pedestal fan yesterday. When I got it home I 
>>> noticed that it claimed "DC motor technology". Turns out that instead 
>>> of a mains lead, it has a plug-pack that connects to it.
>>
>> Was that one of those remote controlled ones?
> 
> Yes, though that wasn't why I bought it.
> Sylvia.

I saw them in Bunnings recently. No mention of power brick on the box 
that I could see. Would be off putting to me as well. Not that we need a 
pedestal fan, we have ceiling fans all over the house.

-- 
Xeno


Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
       (with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#35663

Fromnot@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev)
Date2023-12-08 06:17 +1000
Message-ID<65722849@news.ausics.net>
In reply to#35659
In aus.electronics Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> wrote:
> On 07-Dec-23 10:05 pm, Xeno wrote:
>> On 7/12/2023 9:58 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
>>> I bought an Arlec pedestal fan yesterday. When I got it home I noticed 
>>> that it claimed "DC motor technology". Turns out that instead of a 
>>> mains lead, it has a plug-pack that connects to it.
>> 
>> Was that one of those remote controlled ones?
> 
> Yes, though that wasn't why I bought it.

Perhaps the speed is continuously variable instead of in fixed
steps? Personally I prefer old-fashioned ones with a physical speed
switch, but if people demand blinky lights and remote controls
then this is what they'll get. Unfortunately there's far more to go
wrong as a result, and probably far more power wasted too.

-- 
__          __
#_ < |\| |< _#  | Note: I won't see posts made from Google Groups |

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#35667

FromSylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>
Date2023-12-08 11:03 +1100
Message-ID<ktf4qlF2it3U1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#35663
On 08-Dec-23 7:17 am, Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
> In aus.electronics Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> wrote:
>> On 07-Dec-23 10:05 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>> On 7/12/2023 9:58 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
>>>> I bought an Arlec pedestal fan yesterday. When I got it home I noticed
>>>> that it claimed "DC motor technology". Turns out that instead of a
>>>> mains lead, it has a plug-pack that connects to it.
>>>
>>> Was that one of those remote controlled ones?
>>
>> Yes, though that wasn't why I bought it.
> 
> Perhaps the speed is continuously variable instead of in fixed
> steps? Personally I prefer old-fashioned ones with a physical speed
> switch, but if people demand blinky lights and remote controls
> then this is what they'll get. Unfortunately there's far more to go
> wrong as a result, and probably far more power wasted too.
> 

The box claimed that the fan was more efficient. That could be true, 
because it appears that the typical split phase induction motor is not 
very efficient. However, we're talking about around 10 watts saving at 
most, so it's not something I would take into account when buying a fan.

Sylvia.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#35661

From"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com>
Date2023-12-08 04:09 +1100
Message-ID<op.2fldygx2byq249@pvr2.lan>
In reply to#35657
Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> wrote

> I bought an Arlec pedestal fan yesterday. When I got it home I noticed  
> that it claimed "DC motor technology". Turns out that instead of a mains  
> lead, it has a plug-pack that connects to it.

> Anyway, I assume their motive for this change is cost,

Can't see that.

> so we may see it  in other models/brands.

> Something to watch out for.

Why are you assuming that it's a bad thing ?

> As it happened, a part was missing, and I was able to return it for a  
> refund.

You can with the best sellers if it turns out you don't like something  
about it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#35662

FromMighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com>
Date2023-12-08 07:03 +1100
Message-ID<ktemolFtul8U1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#35661
Rod Speed wrote:
> Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> wrote
>
>> I bought an Arlec pedestal fan yesterday. When I got it home I 
>> noticed that it claimed "DC motor technology". Turns out that instead 
>> of a mains lead, it has a plug-pack that connects to it.
>
>> Anyway, I assume their motive for this change is cost,
>
> Can't see that.
>
>> so we may see it  in other models/brands.
>
>> Something to watch out for.
>
> Why are you assuming that it's a bad thing ?

that's what I was wondering

>
>> As it happened, a part was missing, and I was able to return it for a 
>> refund.
>
> You can with the best sellers if it turns out you don't like something 
> about it.


-- 
Have a nice day!..

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#35664

FromSylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>
Date2023-12-08 08:11 +1100
Message-ID<kteqo2FapsU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#35661
On 08-Dec-23 4:09 am, Rod Speed wrote:
> Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> wrote
> 
>> I bought an Arlec pedestal fan yesterday. When I got it home I noticed 
>> that it claimed "DC motor technology". Turns out that instead of a 
>> mains lead, it has a plug-pack that connects to it.
> 
>> Anyway, I assume their motive for this change is cost,
> 
> Can't see that.
> 
>> so we may see it  in other models/brands.
> 
>> Something to watch out for.
> 
> Why are you assuming that it's a bad thing ?
> 

If you like wall-warts everywhere, then fine.

Sylvia.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#35665

Fromnot@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev)
Date2023-12-08 07:26 +1000
Message-ID<6572389d@news.ausics.net>
In reply to#35664
In aus.cars Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> wrote:
> On 08-Dec-23 4:09 am, Rod Speed wrote:
>>> Something to watch out for.
>> 
>> Why are you assuming that it's a bad thing ?
> 
> If you like wall-warts everywhere, then fine.

Huh. I can see a few reasons why I wouldn't like a DC pedestal fan,
but I honestly never thought that anyone would be bothered by the
meer presence of a plugpack on a wall.

I suppose they can be awkward to use with extension lead though,
which a fan could often be used with.

-- 
__          __
#_ < |\| |< _#  | Note: I won't see posts made from Google Groups |

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#35666

FromXeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au>
Date2023-12-08 10:59 +1100
Message-ID<ktf4jiF2ishU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#35665
On 8/12/2023 8:26 am, Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
> In aus.cars Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> wrote:
>> On 08-Dec-23 4:09 am, Rod Speed wrote:
>>>> Something to watch out for.
>>>
>>> Why are you assuming that it's a bad thing ?
>>
>> If you like wall-warts everywhere, then fine.
> 
> Huh. I can see a few reasons why I wouldn't like a DC pedestal fan,
> but I honestly never thought that anyone would be bothered by the
> meer presence of a plugpack on a wall.
> 
> I suppose they can be awkward to use with extension lead though,
> which a fan could often be used with.
> 
Wall Warts are a PITA. The company buys in a heap of wall warts that are 
already Aus certified for 230V so they don't need to have the fan itself 
certified. Cheaping out is all it is.


-- 
Xeno


Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
       (with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#35668

FromSylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>
Date2023-12-08 11:06 +1100
Message-ID<ktf4vuF2it3U2@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#35666
On 08-Dec-23 10:59 am, Xeno wrote:
> On 8/12/2023 8:26 am, Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
>> In aus.cars Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> wrote:
>>> On 08-Dec-23 4:09 am, Rod Speed wrote:
>>>>> Something to watch out for.
>>>>
>>>> Why are you assuming that it's a bad thing ?
>>>
>>> If you like wall-warts everywhere, then fine.
>>
>> Huh. I can see a few reasons why I wouldn't like a DC pedestal fan,
>> but I honestly never thought that anyone would be bothered by the
>> meer presence of a plugpack on a wall.
>>
>> I suppose they can be awkward to use with extension lead though,
>> which a fan could often be used with.
>>
> Wall Warts are a PITA. The company buys in a heap of wall warts that are 
> already Aus certified for 230V so they don't need to have the fan itself 
> certified. Cheaping out is all it is.
> 
> 

What puzzles me is how quickly the models change, which presumably means 
they have to be re-certified. Are consumers really so shallow that 
they'll refuse to buy something that was already available a year ago?

Sylvia.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#35670

FromKeithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au>
Date2023-12-08 10:56 +1000
Message-ID<ktf7uhF2q3rU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#35668
On 8/12/2023 10:06 am, Sylvia Else wrote:
> On 08-Dec-23 10:59 am, Xeno wrote:
>> On 8/12/2023 8:26 am, Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
>>> In aus.cars Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> wrote:
>>>> On 08-Dec-23 4:09 am, Rod Speed wrote:
>>>>>> Something to watch out for.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why are you assuming that it's a bad thing ?
>>>>
>>>> If you like wall-warts everywhere, then fine.
>>>
>>> Huh. I can see a few reasons why I wouldn't like a DC pedestal fan,
>>> but I honestly never thought that anyone would be bothered by the
>>> meer presence of a plugpack on a wall.
>>>
>>> I suppose they can be awkward to use with extension lead though,
>>> which a fan could often be used with.
>>>
>> Wall Warts are a PITA. The company buys in a heap of wall warts that 
>> are already Aus certified for 230V so they don't need to have the fan 
>> itself certified. Cheaping out is all it is.
>>
>>
> 
> What puzzles me is how quickly the models change, which presumably means 
> they have to be re-certified. 

Perhaps after certifying the plug pack, the fan does not require 
certification since it is only a low voltage device not directly 
connected to the mains. Thus they can change the fan model at will.

> Are consumers really so shallow that 
> they'll refuse to buy something that was already available a year ago?

Oscar Wilde observed that fashion is a form of ugliness so extreme that 
it needs to be changed regularly

> Sylvia.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#35673

FromPeter Jason <pj@jostle.com>
Date2023-12-08 13:21 +1100
Message-ID<m5u4ni1spllimffh4saba301shjt7q04h7@4ax.com>
In reply to#35668
On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 11:06:22 +1100, Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>
wrote:

>On 08-Dec-23 10:59 am, Xeno wrote:
>> On 8/12/2023 8:26 am, Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
>>> In aus.cars Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> wrote:
>>>> On 08-Dec-23 4:09 am, Rod Speed wrote:
>>>>>> Something to watch out for.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why are you assuming that it's a bad thing ?
>>>>
>>>> If you like wall-warts everywhere, then fine.
>>>
>>> Huh. I can see a few reasons why I wouldn't like a DC pedestal fan,
>>> but I honestly never thought that anyone would be bothered by the
>>> meer presence of a plugpack on a wall.
>>>
>>> I suppose they can be awkward to use with extension lead though,
>>> which a fan could often be used with.
>>>
>> Wall Warts are a PITA. The company buys in a heap of wall warts that are 
>> already Aus certified for 230V so they don't need to have the fan itself 
>> certified. Cheaping out is all it is.
>> 
>> 
>
>What puzzles me is how quickly the models change, which presumably means 
>they have to be re-certified. Are consumers really so shallow that 
>they'll refuse to buy something that was already available a year ago?
>
>Sylvia.

Yes, they're pretty stoopid.
And women shop until their husband's drop.

I have a few pedestal fans acquired by gleaning the piles of stuff on
the footpath, after the landlord has thrown out his tenant.

I have numerous Objet d'art, mainly paintings that have suffered a
like fate, all costing me $zilch.   These cover the walls and even
make the rooms look bigger.
  
The fans service the TV room, the parlour, the maid's room, the music
room, the dining room, the dressing room, the bedroom (2), and even
the spare room!

Fans are very useful because they evenly distribute the heat and cool
fixing stratification.   Ceiling fans are better, but the poor can't
be choosey.

I do have an old utility, a Toyota 98 model which helps in
collections.  A good friend of mine, now sadly departed this
spendthrift world, refused to buy any appliance new, instead just
turned over his old stuff when it broke down.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#35683

From"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com>
Date2023-12-09 04:58 +1100
Message-ID<op.2fnau1sobyq249@pvr2.lan>
In reply to#35668
Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> wrote
> Xeno wrote
>> Computer Nerd Kev wrote
>>> Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> wrote
>>>> Rod Speed wrote

>>>>>> Something to watch out for.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why are you assuming that it's a bad thing ?
>>>>
>>>> If you like wall-warts everywhere, then fine.
>>>
>>> Huh. I can see a few reasons why I wouldn't like a DC pedestal fan,
>>> but I honestly never thought that anyone would be bothered by the
>>> meer presence of a plugpack on a wall.
>>>
>>> I suppose they can be awkward to use with extension lead though,
>>> which a fan could often be used with.
>>>
>> Wall Warts are a PITA. The company buys in a heap of wall warts that  
>> are already Aus certified for 230V so they don't need to have the fan  
>> itself certified. Cheaping out is all it is.

> What puzzles me is how quickly the models change, which presumablymeans   
> they have to be re-certified. Are consumers really so shallow that  
> they'll refuse to buy something that was already available a year ago?

That's not what its about.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#35672

FromMighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com>
Date2023-12-08 12:26 +1100
Message-ID<ktf9mjF3kedU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#35666
Xeno wrote:
> On 8/12/2023 8:26 am, Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
>> In aus.cars Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> wrote:
>>> On 08-Dec-23 4:09 am, Rod Speed wrote:
>>>>> Something to watch out for.
>>>>
>>>> Why are you assuming that it's a bad thing ?
>>>
>>> If you like wall-warts everywhere, then fine.
>>
>> Huh. I can see a few reasons why I wouldn't like a DC pedestal fan,
>> but I honestly never thought that anyone would be bothered by the
>> meer presence of a plugpack on a wall.
>>
>> I suppose they can be awkward to use with extension lead though,
>> which a fan could often be used with.
>>
> Wall Warts are a PITA. The company buys in a heap of wall warts that 
> are already Aus certified for 230V so they don't need to have the fan 
> itself certified. Cheaping out is all it is.
>
>

but they would have to remake the fan to run on DC, so false economy

-- 
Have a nice day!..

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#35674

FromXeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au>
Date2023-12-08 15:03 +1100
Message-ID<ktfit0F5njtU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#35672
On 8/12/2023 12:26 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
> Xeno wrote:
>> On 8/12/2023 8:26 am, Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
>>> In aus.cars Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> wrote:
>>>> On 08-Dec-23 4:09 am, Rod Speed wrote:
>>>>>> Something to watch out for.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why are you assuming that it's a bad thing ?
>>>>
>>>> If you like wall-warts everywhere, then fine.
>>>
>>> Huh. I can see a few reasons why I wouldn't like a DC pedestal fan,
>>> but I honestly never thought that anyone would be bothered by the
>>> meer presence of a plugpack on a wall.
>>>
>>> I suppose they can be awkward to use with extension lead though,
>>> which a fan could often be used with.
>>>
>> Wall Warts are a PITA. The company buys in a heap of wall warts that 
>> are already Aus certified for 230V so they don't need to have the fan 
>> itself certified. Cheaping out is all it is.
>>
>>
> 
> but they would have to remake the fan to run on DC, so false economy
> 
But they only have to design and make it *once* with *no 230V AC cert. 
The wall wart will be certified by the maker they buy it from, again, 
the fan co, needs no certification. All *redesigns* need no renewal of 
certification.


-- 
Xeno


Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
       (with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#35676

FromComputer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid>
Date2023-12-08 16:18 +1000
Message-ID<6572b519@news.ausics.net>
In reply to#35666
In aus.electronics Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> On 8/12/2023 8:26 am, Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
>> In aus.cars Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> wrote:
>>> If you like wall-warts everywhere, then fine.
>> 
>> Huh. I can see a few reasons why I wouldn't like a DC pedestal fan,
>> but I honestly never thought that anyone would be bothered by the
>> meer presence of a plugpack on a wall.
>> 
>> I suppose they can be awkward to use with extension lead though,
>> which a fan could often be used with.
>> 
> Wall Warts are a PITA. The company buys in a heap of wall warts that are 
> already Aus certified for 230V so they don't need to have the fan itself 
> certified. Cheaping out is all it is.

Sure, my fans are all AC ones with chunky knobs to turn, so the
idea of DC seems like extra complication to me wherever the PSU is.

Besides the certification issue, plugpacks also allow them to use a
cheap low-voltage cable running to the fan.

-- 
__          __
#_ < |\| |< _#  | Note: I won't see posts made from Google Groups |

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#35680

FromSylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>
Date2023-12-08 21:43 +1100
Message-ID<ktgaavFce78U2@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#35676
On 08-Dec-23 5:18 pm, Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
> In aus.electronics Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>> On 8/12/2023 8:26 am, Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
>>> In aus.cars Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> wrote:
>>>> If you like wall-warts everywhere, then fine.
>>>
>>> Huh. I can see a few reasons why I wouldn't like a DC pedestal fan,
>>> but I honestly never thought that anyone would be bothered by the
>>> meer presence of a plugpack on a wall.
>>>
>>> I suppose they can be awkward to use with extension lead though,
>>> which a fan could often be used with.
>>>
>> Wall Warts are a PITA. The company buys in a heap of wall warts that are
>> already Aus certified for 230V so they don't need to have the fan itself
>> certified. Cheaping out is all it is.
> 
> Sure, my fans are all AC ones with chunky knobs to turn, so the
> idea of DC seems like extra complication to me wherever the PSU is.
> 
> Besides the certification issue, plugpacks also allow them to use a
> cheap low-voltage cable running to the fan.

But the cable has to handle a higher current, and will use more metal, 
even if it uses less plastic. It's not clear that there's a saving there.

Sylvia.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#35685

FromDaryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au>
Date2023-12-09 09:25 +1100
Message-ID<kthje8FmslmU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#35680
On 8/12/2023 9:43 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
> On 08-Dec-23 5:18 pm, Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
>> In aus.electronics Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>>> On 8/12/2023 8:26 am, Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
>>>> In aus.cars Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> If you like wall-warts everywhere, then fine.
>>>>
>>>> Huh. I can see a few reasons why I wouldn't like a DC pedestal fan,
>>>> but I honestly never thought that anyone would be bothered by the
>>>> meer presence of a plugpack on a wall.
>>>>
>>>> I suppose they can be awkward to use with extension lead though,
>>>> which a fan could often be used with.
>>>>
>>> Wall Warts are a PITA. The company buys in a heap of wall warts that are
>>> already Aus certified for 230V so they don't need to have the fan itself
>>> certified. Cheaping out is all it is.
>>
>> Sure, my fans are all AC ones with chunky knobs to turn, so the
>> idea of DC seems like extra complication to me wherever the PSU is.
>>
>> Besides the certification issue, plugpacks also allow them to use a
>> cheap low-voltage cable running to the fan.
> 
> But the cable has to handle a higher current, and will use more metal, 
> even if it uses less plastic. It's not clear that there's a saving there.
> 

Could be to do with a Govt regulation somewhere that states that 
appliances must use less power, its that way in the automotive world, 
some of the changes that manufacturers make don't seem to make any sense 
at all until you look at the regulations they must comply with.

-- 
Daryl

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | aus.electronics


csiph-web