Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > aus.computers > #74166 > unrolled thread

test only

Started byPetzl <petzlx@gmail.com>
First post2026-09-08 13:45 +1000
Last post2026-09-11 09:47 +1000
Articles 7 on this page of 27 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to aus.computers

Contents

  test only Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-09-08 13:45 +1000
    Re: test only "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-09-08 17:03 +1000
      Re: test only Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-09-08 20:37 +1000
        Re: test only "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-09-09 05:37 +1000
          Re: test only Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-09-09 06:06 +1000
            Re: test only "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-09-09 08:10 +1000
              Re: test only Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-09-09 09:25 +1000
                Re: test only "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-09-09 11:53 +1000
                  Re: test only Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-09-09 13:37 +1000
                    Re: test only "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-09-09 15:51 +1000
                      Re: test only Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-09-09 20:22 +1000
                        Re: test only "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-09-10 04:56 +1000
                          Re: test only Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-09-10 08:23 +1000
                            Re: test only "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-09-10 08:58 +1000
                              Re: test only Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-09-10 11:09 +1000
                            Re: test only "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-09-10 09:37 +1000
                              Re: test only Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-09-10 10:53 +1000
                                Re: test only "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-09-10 13:42 +1000
                                  Re: test only Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-09-10 17:43 +1000
                                    Re: test only "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-09-10 18:30 +1000
                                      Re: test only Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-09-10 18:38 +1000
                                        Re: test only "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-09-10 19:07 +1000
                        Re: test only "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-09-10 05:50 +1000
                        Re: test only "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-09-10 07:13 +1000
                  Re: test only Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-09-09 19:35 +1000
        Re: test only Newsmaster <newsmaster@ausics.net> - 2026-09-11 09:15 +1000
          Re: test only Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-09-11 09:47 +1000

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#74193

FromPetzl <petzlx@gmail.com>
Date2026-09-10 18:38 +1000
Message-ID<53r4all105l0t3ine0hapiad1p1lfc6nc5@4ax.com>
In reply to#74192
On Thu, 10 Sep 2026 18:30:03 +1000, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

>Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote

-- 
<https://www.perplexity.ai/search/rod-speed-usenet-troll-iBra.u6iSuy..0dwUJuvhQ#0>
     https://tinyurl.com/z5hh3shh  
Rod Speed is known in Usenet communities as a notorious 
argumentative figure often labeled a troll.

So says Rod speed a egotistical self appointed know-all who knows nothing
Rod has been on newgroups since the 80's and still the same

Rod Speed a annoying  Australian can type faster than you can talk
Best to ignore or he will continue to bait you
Rod speed a egotistical self appointed know-all who knows nothing
Rod has been on newgroups since the 80's and still the same

When he starts short vulgar bursts just stop replying--

If you want to practice talking to his idiot responses Australia has a
bot to practice with or he white ants you overtime you post!
"The Rod Speed Bot"
https://www.sensationbot.com/jschat.php?db=rodspeed
 
ROD SPEED A SELF APPOINTED EGOTISTICAL KNOW-ALL WHO KNOWS NOTHING    
   JUST FULL OF
         R
          O
           D
           
            S
             P
              E
               E
                D

           B
            U
             L
              L
               S
                H
                 I
                  T
   DON'T STEP IN IT!

IT DOESN'T MATTER IF ROD SPEED'S HEART IS IN THE RIGHT PLACE, 
HIS HEAD IS UP HIS OWN ARSE, ALWAYS FARTING EYLASHES!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#74195

From"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com>
Date2026-09-10 19:07 +1000
Message-ID<op.3vffl2i7byq249@pvr2.lan>
In reply to#74193
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote just the
usual shit it always ends up with when its got
done like a fucking dinner, as it always is

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#74179

From"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com>
Date2026-09-10 05:50 +1000
Message-ID<op.3veeprvgbyq249@pvr2.lan>
In reply to#74177
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote

>> I don't believe you, its entirely the steaming turd
>> you have dropped countless times before

>> And that's what grok says too
>> https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_128a3e35-caaa-4f22-88a9-347c7e909777

> I had GROK do it's version

You are a pathological liar
https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_454364f6-b392-4f47-b825-480f9fef556b

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#74180

From"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com>
Date2026-09-10 07:13 +1000
Message-ID<op.3veik9etbyq249@pvr2.lan>
In reply to#74177
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote

>> I don't believe you, its entirely the steaming turd
>> you have dropped countless times before

>> And that's what grok says too
>> https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_128a3e35-caaa-4f22-88a9-347c7e909777

> I had GROK do it's version

Grok never said that, you pathological liar
https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_454364f6-b392-4f47-b825-480f9fef556b

> The original drafts of the Australian Constitution contained no
> reference to God. The words “humbly relying on the blessing of
> Almighty God” were inserted into the preamble of the Commonwealth of
> Australia Constitution Act 1900 after deliberate debate and petition
> at the Federal Conventions. That insertion formed part of the
> constitutional compact as finally adopted.
> Sir John Downer KC, speaking at the moment of adoption and expressly
> for future generations, declared that “Our Australian Commonwealth
> from its first stage will be a Christian Commonwealth.” In the
> vocabulary of the framers the word “religion” referred only to the
> several denominations of Christianity. That was the sole meaning the
> term carried in the constitutional text they enacted. The Christian
> character of the new polity—expressed in the monarchical oath under
> God, the Almighty God clause of the covering Act, and the received
> common-law heritage—was therefore an assumed and operative premise of
> the Constitution as they understood and adopted it.
> Section 116 of the Constitution denies the Commonwealth any power to
> change the meaning of religion. The section provides that the
> Commonwealth shall not make any law for establishing any religion,
> imposing any religious observance, or prohibiting the free exercise of
> any religion, and that no religious test shall be required for office
> under the Commonwealth. In the understanding of the framers the word
> “religion” referred only to the Christian denominations. Section 116
> therefore locks that meaning against Commonwealth alteration. The
> definition and regulation of religion, beyond the specific
> prohibitions in section 116, is the domain of the States. Any attempt
> by the Commonwealth—whether by legislation or by judicial
> redefinition—to expand “religion” beyond the Christian denominations
> known to the framers is contrary to the original text and requires the
> authority of the people under section 128.
> Because the founding Christian culture and language formed part of the
> original meaning, any judicial reading that treats “any religion” as
> an open, pluralist category unknown to the framers rewrites the
> Constitution without authority.
> A genuine change from the Christian commonwealth the framers
> established to a secular multicultural framework can be made only by
> the people themselves under section 128. It cannot be effected by case
> law.
> That is the coherent originalist position.
> It is not the course the High Court has taken.
> The Court has retained the text, treated the Christian heritage as
> mere background, and then permitted modern interpretation to move far
> beyond the framers’ understanding—without returning to the electors
> under section 128.
> The clearest illustration is the 1983 Scientology case (Church of the
> New Faith v Commissioner of Pay-roll Tax).
> There the High Court discarded the traditional meaning of
> religion—limited to the Christian denominations known to the
> framers—and substituted a broad modern definition covering any belief
> system that involves a supernatural being, thing or principle together
> with a code of conduct.
> That expansion altered a core constitutional concept by judicial
> decree rather than by referendum.
> The originalist view is straightforward.
> The Constitution belongs to the people.
> When the meaning of a foundational term such as “religion” is shifted
> from the Christian denominations the framers knew to a secular
> multicultural category they never contemplated, the change must be put
> to the Australian voters under section 128.
> Judicial redefinition bypasses the democratic process and amends the
> founding document without the people’s consent.
> The alternative approach treated by the High Court as a “living”
> instrument allows the application of the words to evolve with
> contemporary social conditions.
> That path has carried Australian law a long distance from the framers’
> assumptions.
> To those who hold that the original meaning governs until the people
> alter it, the result is a quiet constitutional change effected without
> a vote.
> The same pattern appears in the treatment of symbols.
> The Australia Act 1986 severed the remaining legislative and appellate
> links with the United Kingdom.
> Thereafter the continued display of the British Royal Arms in
> Australian courts was characterised as an anachronism.
> State legislation followed.
> The New South Wales State Arms, Symbols and Emblems Act 2004 required
> the British Royal Arms to be removed from courtrooms and parliamentary
> buildings and replaced with the State Arms so as to reflect
> independent sovereignty.
> In newer buildings such as the ACT Supreme Court the walls behind the
> bench have been left deliberately blank, the stated purpose being to
> mark the judiciary as a separate branch of government rather than one
> sitting under an historic emblem.
> To the originalist these changes form part of the steady dismantling
> of the founding architecture.
> When the British coat of arms is taken down, the motto “Dieu et mon
> droit” disappears with it.
> That motto, the battle cry of Richard I at Gisors in 1198, asserted in
> its proper medieval sense that the King’s right was derived from
> God—“God is my legal right”—and that he answered to no earthly
> authority.
> Its removal, and the substitution of native fauna or blank walls,
> severs a visible thread of the sovereignty the framers inherited and
> assumed.
> (By contrast, the Royal Coat of Arms remains in regular use in the
> great majority of courtrooms throughout the United Kingdom.)
> In short, the word “religion” in the Constitution as originally
> understood referred only to the Christian denominations.
> Section 116 denies the Commonwealth power to alter that meaning; the
> domain remains with the States.
> Any wider meaning requires the authority of the people expressed in a
> section 128 referendum.
> That is the presentation required by the original text and by the
> legal advice that the change, if it is to be made, must be made by the
> electors themselves.
>
> https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtMw_e5ecc77c-554c-4e25-a335-361d4aee3ade
> Bottom line
> The document correctly identifies the Christian cultural and legal
> matrix in which the Constitution was framed, the deliberate insertion
> of the Almighty God clause, Downer’s contemporaneous characterisation,
> and the High Court’s later expansive approach to “religion.” It then
> draws the strong originalist conclusion that any move beyond the
> framers’ Christian denominational understanding of “religion,” or any
> analogous change in constitutional symbolism, requires s 128 approval
> and cannot validly be effected by judicial or ordinary legislative
> action.
> That is a coherent position within originalist theory.
> It is not the position the High Court has adopted, nor the
> understanding that has governed Australian public law and practice for
> decades.
> The gap between the two is precisely the ongoing debate over whether
> the Constitution is to be read according to its original public
> meaning until the people change it, or whether its application may
> evolve with changed social conditions without formal amendment.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#74176

FromPetzl <petzlx@gmail.com>
Date2026-09-09 19:35 +1000
Message-ID<esk1al1f7b8bu3egae4eern6hovl5odusv@4ax.com>
In reply to#74173
On Wed, 09 Sep 2026 11:53:04 +1000, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

>Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>> Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
>
>>>> What a good idea One Nation is doing in kicking known malcontents out
>>>> of press conferences for "spin," "lies," "rubbish," or decency failing
>>>> to ever report the truth.
>
>>> You wouldn't know what the truth was if it bit
>>> you on your drug crazed drunken lard arse
>
>>> Yes, journos shouldn't be getting stuck in to
>>> who ever is doing the press conference, they
>>> should just be REPORTING what those doing
>>> the press conference are presenting
>
>> See not hard to show some reasoning
>
>Something you can never manage with that steaming
>turd you dropped about the constitution

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#74208

FromNewsmaster <newsmaster@ausics.net>
Date2026-09-11 09:15 +1000
Message-ID<o9153n67-sn38-77o1-3r11-n6q224on95po@arjf.nhfvpf.arg>
In reply to#74168

On Tue, 8 Sep 2026, Petzl wrote:

>> Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
>
> -- 
> <https://www.perplexity.ai/search/rod-speed-usenet-troll-iBra.u6iSuy..0dwUJuvhQ#0>
>     https://tinyurl.com/z5hh3shh

> "The Rod Speed Bot"

bullshit!  Your AI  is as AI is, slop.
Always known as "Rod Bot"
Never has "speed" been included in all the years I've  known him.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#74209

FromPetzl <petzlx@gmail.com>
Date2026-09-11 09:47 +1000
Message-ID<80g6al9tr9k9mbt9a2i1de3rhqksn079rk@4ax.com>
In reply to#74208
On Fri, 11 Sep 2026 09:15:27 +1000, Newsmaster <newsmaster@ausics.net>
wrote:

>
>
>On Tue, 8 Sep 2026, Petzl wrote:
>
>>> Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
>>
>> -- 
>> <https://www.perplexity.ai/search/rod-speed-usenet-troll-iBra.u6iSuy..0dwUJuvhQ#0>
>>     https://tinyurl.com/z5hh3shh
>
>> "The Rod Speed Bot"
>
>bullshit!  Your AI  is as AI is, slop.
>Always known as "Rod Bot"
>Never has "speed" been included in all the years I've  known him.
>
Thanks Rod Speed I take it 
news.ausics.net
https://newsgroups.ausics.net/
will be your next troll home 
when Usenet  individual.net bites the dust
That's where I'm going, any problems with it?
-- 
Petzl 
It's hard to win an argument with a smart person but it's damn near impossible to win
an argument with a stupid person

When you're dead, you don't know you're dead. 
The pain is felt by others.

The same thing happens when you're stupid

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | aus.computers

csiph-web