Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > aus.computers > #71508 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2024-12-21 11:50 +1100 |
| Last post | 2024-12-24 20:17 +1100 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 184 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to aus.computers
The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-21 11:50 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2024-12-21 14:15 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Noddy <me@home.com> - 2024-12-21 17:43 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-21 17:59 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-21 18:48 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2024-12-21 19:33 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-21 20:46 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2024-12-22 08:09 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Noddy <me@home.com> - 2024-12-22 09:41 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-22 00:08 +0000
Re: The real cost of net zero Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2024-12-22 11:39 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Noddy <me@home.com> - 2024-12-22 12:09 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-22 12:45 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2024-12-22 13:51 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Noddy <me@home.com> - 2024-12-22 16:13 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2024-12-22 16:22 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Noddy <me@home.com> - 2024-12-22 17:15 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-22 16:42 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> - 2024-12-23 07:34 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-23 13:02 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-22 12:35 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2024-12-22 13:29 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-22 13:41 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2024-12-22 15:27 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2024-12-22 18:31 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-22 18:33 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-23 11:43 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-23 11:38 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-23 13:13 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2024-12-23 13:40 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Noddy <me@home.com> - 2024-12-23 14:08 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-23 15:25 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Noddy <me@home.com> - 2024-12-23 14:08 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-23 15:26 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-23 15:40 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2024-12-23 16:30 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-23 17:14 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2024-12-23 19:24 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-23 20:25 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-12-23 21:00 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-24 05:35 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-24 22:58 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-24 23:13 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-25 07:31 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2024-12-25 08:28 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> - 2024-12-23 07:23 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-23 11:22 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> - 2024-12-23 11:21 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-23 13:57 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-23 15:16 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2024-12-23 18:07 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-24 15:53 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-24 18:41 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-24 19:48 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-24 20:07 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> - 2024-12-25 07:00 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-25 10:38 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-12-25 21:52 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 04:51 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-12-26 19:40 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 20:17 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 05:47 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-26 13:18 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 14:35 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero MightyMouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-26 16:06 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 15:14 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-12-26 19:48 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> - 2024-12-28 07:07 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-24 15:51 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-24 18:40 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-24 19:52 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2024-12-24 19:42 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-24 21:29 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-12-24 20:57 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-24 21:38 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-12-25 08:08 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-25 09:37 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 12:41 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-26 13:34 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-12-23 21:27 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> - 2024-12-23 07:16 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-23 11:17 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> - 2024-12-23 11:32 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-23 13:59 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-23 15:17 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-24 15:46 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-24 18:29 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2024-12-23 18:23 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-24 15:48 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> - 2024-12-24 15:40 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-24 20:00 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2024-12-24 19:11 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-24 20:16 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-12-24 21:07 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-24 21:40 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-25 07:16 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-12-25 22:02 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 04:52 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-12-26 19:55 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 20:19 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-26 21:11 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-27 04:39 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-12-27 19:36 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-27 20:07 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 05:51 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-26 11:42 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-26 13:22 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-26 13:39 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2024-12-24 20:34 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-24 21:46 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Noddy <me@home.com> - 2024-12-24 21:55 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-24 23:09 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Lindsay <lindsay00@nunnya.biz> - 2024-12-24 23:51 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> - 2024-12-25 07:20 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-25 10:51 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2024-12-25 18:50 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2024-12-26 16:29 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-26 18:25 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 18:00 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero MightyMouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-26 19:08 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-26 21:05 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 20:26 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-26 23:24 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Noddy <me@home.com> - 2024-12-26 19:44 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-26 21:08 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 20:40 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-26 22:08 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-26 23:26 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-26 23:46 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-12-27 19:53 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-26 18:33 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-25 07:24 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2024-12-25 08:20 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-25 10:43 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-23 13:03 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-23 14:00 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2024-12-23 14:58 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-23 15:26 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-23 15:44 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2024-12-23 16:32 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-23 17:19 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2024-12-24 12:29 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-24 13:10 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> - 2024-12-24 15:32 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-24 18:42 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-24 15:37 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-12-24 21:24 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-12-24 21:34 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-25 07:21 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-24 21:43 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-12-25 00:09 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-25 07:27 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2024-12-25 08:24 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-25 09:15 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-25 10:53 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-25 07:18 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-12-25 22:25 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 04:53 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-12-26 20:52 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-27 04:44 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-24 15:35 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-24 18:26 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-24 20:05 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2024-12-24 18:37 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-24 20:06 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> - 2024-12-25 07:41 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-25 09:27 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 06:03 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-26 13:25 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 14:16 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 15:18 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-26 16:31 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 17:40 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero MightyMouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-26 18:58 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2024-12-23 18:32 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-12-23 21:34 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-24 15:34 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-24 18:26 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-23 15:20 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2024-12-23 15:35 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-24 15:41 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-24 18:28 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2024-12-24 20:02 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-24 20:17 +1100
Page 8 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 Next page →
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-23 17:19 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <op.2y7yjhq7byq249@pvr2.lan> |
| In reply to | #71568 |
On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 16:32:47 +1100, Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: > On 23/12/2024 3:44 pm, Rod Speed wrote: >> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:58:40 +1100, Trevor Wilson >> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >> >>> On 23/12/2024 2:00 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>> Xeno wrote: >>>>> On 23/12/2024 11:17 am, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>> alvey wrote: >>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Get the facts. radio interview I recorded with Chris Uhlmann, >>>>>>>> award winning journalist and Sky News Political Contributor >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://auslink.info/audio/netzero.mp4 (20Kb) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> or watch the documentary .. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbxpieEQ7bc >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why would anyone interested in this subject bother with a piece by >>>>>>> a political journalist & produced by Murdoch? Try finding >>>>>>> something by qualified experts in the subject. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> so everything that was said is wrong or a lie, is that it? >>>>> >>>>> Depends on what is omitted as much as what is said. >>>>> >>>> anyhow, Dutton will solve the problem when he becomes PM by building >>>> nuclear power plants >>>> >>> >>> Bullshit. Dutton will build exactly ZERO nukes. He will FINALLY crunch >>> the numbers and admit that they are way too expensive. >> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. > Nope. Fact. Can't be a fact until it happens and it won't happen, you watch > Dutton will find out just how much nukes cost and will then announce > that he will not build them. Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. > He will build gas and coal fired power stations instead, because they > are way cheaper, And aren't viable for anything like as long. > Gina wants him to and he doesn't give a crap about CO2 emissions. Because even if we shut down everything which produces any CO2 including that produced in the manufacture of renewables and the concrete used in the stupid wind towers, it would have no measurabe effect what so ever of world climate or even world CO2 levels because we produce fuck all of that compare with what the rest of the world does and will continue to do forever.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-24 12:29 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <lsuh42ForlcU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #71570 |
On 23/12/2024 5:19 pm, Rod Speed wrote: > On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 16:32:47 +1100, Trevor Wilson > <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: > >> On 23/12/2024 3:44 pm, Rod Speed wrote: >>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:58:40 +1100, Trevor Wilson >>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >>> >>>> On 23/12/2024 2:00 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>> Xeno wrote: >>>>>> On 23/12/2024 11:17 am, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>> alvey wrote: >>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Get the facts. radio interview I recorded with Chris Uhlmann, >>>>>>>>> award winning journalist and Sky News Political Contributor >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://auslink.info/audio/netzero.mp4 (20Kb) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> or watch the documentary .. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbxpieEQ7bc >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Why would anyone interested in this subject bother with a piece >>>>>>>> by a political journalist & produced by Murdoch? Try finding >>>>>>>> something by qualified experts in the subject. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> so everything that was said is wrong or a lie, is that it? >>>>>> >>>>>> Depends on what is omitted as much as what is said. >>>>>> >>>>> anyhow, Dutton will solve the problem when he becomes PM by >>>>> building nuclear power plants >>>>> >>>> >>>> Bullshit. Dutton will build exactly ZERO nukes. He will FINALLY >>>> crunch the numbers and admit that they are way too expensive. > >>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. > >> Nope. Fact. > > Can't be a fact until it happens and it won't happen, you watch > >> Dutton will find out just how much nukes cost and will then announce >> that he will not build them. > > Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. > >> He will build gas and coal fired power stations instead, because they >> are way cheaper, > > And aren't viable for anything like as long. > >> Gina wants him to and he doesn't give a crap about CO2 emissions. > > Because even if we shut down everything which produces any CO2 > including that produced in the manufacture of renewables and the > concrete used in the stupid wind towers, it would have no measurabe > effect what so ever of world climate or even world CO2 levels because > we produce fuck all of that compare with what the rest of the world > does and will continue to do forever. Got it in one but don't tell Trev:-) -- Daryl
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-24 13:10 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <op.2y9hn0ozbyq249@pvr2.lan> |
| In reply to | #71582 |
On Tue, 24 Dec 2024 12:29:38 +1100, Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> wrote: > On 23/12/2024 5:19 pm, Rod Speed wrote: >> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 16:32:47 +1100, Trevor Wilson >> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >> >>> On 23/12/2024 3:44 pm, Rod Speed wrote: >>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:58:40 +1100, Trevor Wilson >>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 23/12/2024 2:00 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>> Xeno wrote: >>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 11:17 am, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>> alvey wrote: >>>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Get the facts. radio interview I recorded with Chris Uhlmann, >>>>>>>>>> award winning journalist and Sky News Political Contributor >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> https://auslink.info/audio/netzero.mp4 (20Kb) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> or watch the documentary .. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbxpieEQ7bc >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Why would anyone interested in this subject bother with a piece >>>>>>>>> by a political journalist & produced by Murdoch? Try finding >>>>>>>>> something by qualified experts in the subject. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> so everything that was said is wrong or a lie, is that it? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Depends on what is omitted as much as what is said. >>>>>>> >>>>>> anyhow, Dutton will solve the problem when he becomes PM by >>>>>> building nuclear power plants >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Bullshit. Dutton will build exactly ZERO nukes. He will FINALLY >>>>> crunch the numbers and admit that they are way too expensive. >> >>>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. >> >>> Nope. Fact. >> Can't be a fact until it happens and it won't happen, you watch >> >>> Dutton will find out just how much nukes cost and will then announce >>> that he will not build them. >> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. >> >>> He will build gas and coal fired power stations instead, because they >>> are way cheaper, >> And aren't viable for anything like as long. >> >>> Gina wants him to and he doesn't give a crap about CO2 emissions. >> Because even if we shut down everything which produces any CO2 >> including that produced in the manufacture of renewables and the >> concrete used in the stupid wind towers, it would have no measurabe >> effect what so ever of world climate or even world CO2 levels because >> we produce fuck all of that compare with what the rest of the world >> does and will continue to do forever. > > Got it in one but don't tell Trev:-) Yeah, he is clearly slashing his wrists, and just before xmas too
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-24 15:32 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <vkdh2a$1mdv6$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #71582 |
Daryl wrote: > On 23/12/2024 5:19 pm, Rod Speed wrote: >> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 16:32:47 +1100, Trevor Wilson >> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >> >>> On 23/12/2024 3:44 pm, Rod Speed wrote: >>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:58:40 +1100, Trevor Wilson >>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 23/12/2024 2:00 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>> Xeno wrote: >>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 11:17 am, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>> alvey wrote: >>>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Get the facts. radio interview I recorded with Chris Uhlmann, >>>>>>>>>> award winning journalist and Sky News Political Contributor >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> https://auslink.info/audio/netzero.mp4 (20Kb) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> or watch the documentary .. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbxpieEQ7bc >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Why would anyone interested in this subject bother with a piece >>>>>>>>> by a political journalist & produced by Murdoch? Try finding >>>>>>>>> something by qualified experts in the subject. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> so everything that was said is wrong or a lie, is that it? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Depends on what is omitted as much as what is said. >>>>>>> >>>>>> anyhow, Dutton will solve the problem when he becomes PM by >>>>>> building nuclear power plants >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Bullshit. Dutton will build exactly ZERO nukes. He will FINALLY >>>>> crunch the numbers and admit that they are way too expensive. >> >>>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. >> >>> Nope. Fact. >> >> Can't be a fact until it happens and it won't happen, you watch >> >>> Dutton will find out just how much nukes cost and will then announce >>> that he will not build them. >> >> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. >> >>> He will build gas and coal fired power stations instead, because they >>> are way cheaper, >> >> And aren't viable for anything like as long. >> >>> Gina wants him to and he doesn't give a crap about CO2 emissions. >> >> Because even if we shut down everything which produces any CO2 >> including that produced in the manufacture of renewables and the >> concrete used in the stupid wind towers, it would have no measurabe >> effect what so ever of world climate or even world CO2 levels because >> we produce fuck all of that compare with what the rest of the world >> does and will continue to do forever. > > Got it in one but don't tell Trev:-) If he doesn't know by now that you are a selfish amoral arsehole then he needs a brain transplant. As you have no qualms in cosying up with a proven liar, hypocrite and abusive coward then it's entirely consistent for you to not give a shit that you're pumping out environment destroying poison. alvey
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-24 18:42 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <lsv6vhFrrvnU7@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #71592 |
On 24/12/2024 4:32 pm, alvey wrote:
> Daryl wrote:
>> On 23/12/2024 5:19 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 16:32:47 +1100, Trevor Wilson
>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 23/12/2024 3:44 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:58:40 +1100, Trevor Wilson
>>>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 2:00 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>>>> Xeno wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 11:17 am, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>>>>>> alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Get the facts. radio interview I recorded with Chris Uhlmann,
>>>>>>>>>>> award winning journalist and Sky News Political Contributor
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://auslink.info/audio/netzero.mp4 (20Kb)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> or watch the documentary ..
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbxpieEQ7bc
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Why would anyone interested in this subject bother with a
>>>>>>>>>> piece by a political journalist & produced by Murdoch? Try
>>>>>>>>>> finding something by qualified experts in the subject.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> so everything that was said is wrong or a lie, is that it?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Depends on what is omitted as much as what is said.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> anyhow, Dutton will solve the problem when he becomes PM by
>>>>>>> building nuclear power plants
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bullshit. Dutton will build exactly ZERO nukes. He will FINALLY
>>>>>> crunch the numbers and admit that they are way too expensive.
>>>
>>>>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always.
>>>
>>>> Nope. Fact.
>>>
>>> Can't be a fact until it happens and it won't happen, you watch
>>>
>>>> Dutton will find out just how much nukes cost and will then announce
>>>> that he will not build them.
>>>
>>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always.
>>>
>>>> He will build gas and coal fired power stations instead, because
>>>> they are way cheaper,
>>>
>>> And aren't viable for anything like as long.
>>>
>>>> Gina wants him to and he doesn't give a crap about CO2 emissions.
>>>
>>> Because even if we shut down everything which produces any CO2
>>> including that produced in the manufacture of renewables and the
>>> concrete used in the stupid wind towers, it would have no measurabe
>>> effect what so ever of world climate or even world CO2 levels because
>>> we produce fuck all of that compare with what the rest of the world
>>> does and will continue to do forever.
>>
>> Got it in one but don't tell Trev:-)
>
> If he doesn't know by now that you are a selfish amoral arsehole then he
> needs a brain transplant.
>
> As you have no qualms in cosying up with a proven liar, hypocrite and
> abusive coward then it's entirely consistent for you to not give a shit
> that you're pumping out environment destroying poison.
>
>
> alvey
+1
--
Xeno
Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-24 15:37 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <lsus58FqegkU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #71570 |
Rod Speed wrote: > On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 16:32:47 +1100, Trevor Wilson > <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: > >> On 23/12/2024 3:44 pm, Rod Speed wrote: >>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:58:40 +1100, Trevor Wilson >>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >>> >>>> On 23/12/2024 2:00 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>> Xeno wrote: >>>>>> On 23/12/2024 11:17 am, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>> alvey wrote: >>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Get the facts. radio interview I recorded with Chris Uhlmann, >>>>>>>>> award winning journalist and Sky News Political Contributor >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://auslink.info/audio/netzero.mp4 (20Kb) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> or watch the documentary .. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbxpieEQ7bc >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Why would anyone interested in this subject bother with a piece >>>>>>>> by a political journalist & produced by Murdoch? Try finding >>>>>>>> something by qualified experts in the subject. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> so everything that was said is wrong or a lie, is that it? >>>>>> >>>>>> Depends on what is omitted as much as what is said. >>>>>> >>>>> anyhow, Dutton will solve the problem when he becomes PM by >>>>> building nuclear power plants >>>>> >>>> >>>> Bullshit. Dutton will build exactly ZERO nukes. He will FINALLY >>>> crunch the numbers and admit that they are way too expensive. > >>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. > >> Nope. Fact. > > Can't be a fact until it happens and it won't happen, you watch > >> Dutton will find out just how much nukes cost and will then announce >> that he will not build them. > > Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. > >> He will build gas and coal fired power stations instead, because they >> are way cheaper, > > And aren't viable for anything like as long. > >> Gina wants him to and he doesn't give a crap about CO2 emissions. > > Because even if we shut down everything which produces any CO2 > including that produced in the manufacture of renewables and the > concrete used in the stupid wind towers, it would have no measurabe > effect what so ever of world climate or even world CO2 levels because > we produce fuck all of that compare with what the rest of the world > does and will continue to do forever. yep! -- Have a nice day!.. stay sane, be happy, and enjoy living.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-24 21:24 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <vke24e$1q1rt$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #71570 |
Rod Speed wrote on 23/12/24 5:19 pm: > On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 16:32:47 +1100, Trevor Wilson > <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >> On 23/12/2024 3:44 pm, Rod Speed wrote: >>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:58:40 +1100, Trevor Wilson >>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >>>> On 23/12/2024 2:00 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>> Xeno wrote: >>>>>> On 23/12/2024 11:17 am, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>> alvey wrote: >>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Get the facts. radio interview I recorded with Chris Uhlmann, >>>>>>>>> award winning journalist and Sky News Political Contributor >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://auslink.info/audio/netzero.mp4 (20Kb) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> or watch the documentary .. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbxpieEQ7bc >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Why would anyone interested in this subject bother with a piece >>>>>>>> by a political journalist & produced by Murdoch? Try finding >>>>>>>> something by qualified experts in the subject. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> so everything that was said is wrong or a lie, is that it? >>>>>> >>>>>> Depends on what is omitted as much as what is said. >>>>>> >>>>> anyhow, Dutton will solve the problem when he becomes PM by >>>>> building nuclear power plants >>>>> >>>> >>>> Bullshit. Dutton will build exactly ZERO nukes. He will FINALLY >>>> crunch the numbers and admit that they are way too expensive. > >>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. > >> Nope. Fact. > > Can't be a fact until it happens and it won't happen, you watch > >> Dutton will find out just how much nukes cost and will then announce >> that he will not build them. > > Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. > >> He will build gas and coal fired power stations instead, because they >> are way cheaper, > > And aren't viable for anything like as long. > >> Gina wants him to and he doesn't give a crap about CO2 emissions. > > Because even if we shut down everything which produces any CO2 > including that produced in the manufacture of renewables and the > concrete used in the stupid wind towers, it would have no measurabe > effect what so ever of world climate or even world CO2 levels because > we produce fuck all of that compare with what the rest of the world > does and will continue to do forever. You are correct ... to an extent, Roddles. Last I heard/read Australia was producing about 1.25% of the total CO2 even though our population is only approx 0.43% of the worlds population. Maybe that 1.25% figure includes the CO2 we produce in mining stuff which we then sell to others. In any case, if the rest of the Worlds population don't (also) take measures to reduce the increasing atmospheric CO2, WE (AUSTRALIA) WILL SUFFER, TOO!! -- Daniel
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-24 21:34 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <vke2nv$1q642$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #71615 |
Daniel70 wrote on 24/12/24 9:24 pm: > Rod Speed wrote on 23/12/24 5:19 pm: >> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 16:32:47 +1100, Trevor Wilson >> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >>> On 23/12/2024 3:44 pm, Rod Speed wrote: >>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:58:40 +1100, Trevor Wilson >>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >>>>> On 23/12/2024 2:00 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>> Xeno wrote: >>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 11:17 am, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>> alvey wrote: >>>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Get the facts. radio interview I recorded with Chris Uhlmann, >>>>>>>>>> award winning journalist and Sky News Political Contributor >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> https://auslink.info/audio/netzero.mp4 (20Kb) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> or watch the documentary .. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbxpieEQ7bc >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Why would anyone interested in this subject bother with a piece >>>>>>>>> by a political journalist & produced by Murdoch? Try finding >>>>>>>>> something by qualified experts in the subject. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> so everything that was said is wrong or a lie, is that it? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Depends on what is omitted as much as what is said. >>>>>>> >>>>>> anyhow, Dutton will solve the problem when he becomes PM by >>>>>> building nuclear power plants >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Bullshit. Dutton will build exactly ZERO nukes. He will FINALLY >>>>> crunch the numbers and admit that they are way too expensive. >> >>>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. >> >>> Nope. Fact. >> >> Can't be a fact until it happens and it won't happen, you watch >> >>> Dutton will find out just how much nukes cost and will then announce >>> that he will not build them. >> >> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. >> >>> He will build gas and coal fired power stations instead, because they >>> are way cheaper, >> >> And aren't viable for anything like as long. >> >>> Gina wants him to and he doesn't give a crap about CO2 emissions. >> >> Because even if we shut down everything which produces any CO2 >> including that produced in the manufacture of renewables and the >> concrete used in the stupid wind towers, it would have no measurabe >> effect what so ever of world climate or even world CO2 levels because >> we produce fuck all of that compare with what the rest of the world >> does and will continue to do forever. > > You are correct ... to an extent, Roddles. Last I heard/read Australia > was producing about 1.25% of the total CO2 even though our population is > only approx 0.43% of the worlds population. Maybe that 1.25% figure > includes the CO2 we produce in mining stuff which we then sell to others. > > In any case, if the rest of the Worlds population don't (also) take > measures to reduce the increasing atmospheric CO2, WE (AUSTRALIA) WILL > SUFFER, TOO!! O.K., I read in a later post (by Mighty Mouse) that Australia's CO2 emissions are only 1.02% of total production .... but still waaaayy above our 0.43% of world population. https://www.worldometers.info/co2-emissions/co2-emissions-by-country -- Daniel
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-25 07:21 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <op.2zav58udbyq249@pvr2.lan> |
| In reply to | #71617 |
On Tue, 24 Dec 2024 21:34:45 +1100, Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > Daniel70 wrote on 24/12/24 9:24 pm: >> Rod Speed wrote on 23/12/24 5:19 pm: >>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 16:32:47 +1100, Trevor Wilson >>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >>>> On 23/12/2024 3:44 pm, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:58:40 +1100, Trevor Wilson >>>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >>>>>> On 23/12/2024 2:00 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>> Xeno wrote: >>>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 11:17 am, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>> alvey wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Get the facts. radio interview I recorded with Chris Uhlmann, >>>>>>>>>>> award winning journalist and Sky News Political Contributor >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> https://auslink.info/audio/netzero.mp4 (20Kb) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> or watch the documentary .. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbxpieEQ7bc >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Why would anyone interested in this subject bother with a piece >>>>>>>>>> by a political journalist & produced by Murdoch? Try finding >>>>>>>>>> something by qualified experts in the subject. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> so everything that was said is wrong or a lie, is that it? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Depends on what is omitted as much as what is said. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> anyhow, Dutton will solve the problem when he becomes PM by >>>>>>> building nuclear power plants >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Bullshit. Dutton will build exactly ZERO nukes. He will FINALLY >>>>>> crunch the numbers and admit that they are way too expensive. >>> >>>>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. >>> >>>> Nope. Fact. >>> >>> Can't be a fact until it happens and it won't happen, you watch >>> >>>> Dutton will find out just how much nukes cost and will then announce >>>> that he will not build them. >>> >>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. >>> >>>> He will build gas and coal fired power stations instead, because they >>>> are way cheaper, >>> >>> And aren't viable for anything like as long. >>> >>>> Gina wants him to and he doesn't give a crap about CO2 emissions. >>> >>> Because even if we shut down everything which produces any CO2 >>> including that produced in the manufacture of renewables and the >>> concrete used in the stupid wind towers, it would have no measurabe >>> effect what so ever of world climate or even world CO2 levels because >>> we produce fuck all of that compare with what the rest of the world >>> does and will continue to do forever. >> You are correct ... to an extent, Roddles. Last I heard/read Australia >> was producing about 1.25% of the total CO2 even though our population >> is only approx 0.43% of the worlds population. Maybe that 1.25% figure >> includes the CO2 we produce in mining stuff which we then sell to >> others. >> In any case, if the rest of the Worlds population don't (also) take >> measures to reduce the increasing atmospheric CO2, WE (AUSTRALIA) WILL >> SUFFER, TOO!! > > O.K., I read in a later post (by Mighty Mouse) that Australia's CO2 > emissions are only 1.02% of total production .... but still waaaayy > above our 0.43% of world population. Only because we have lots of coal > https://www.worldometers.info/co2-emissions/co2-emissions-by-country
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-24 21:43 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <lsvhi4Ftcv7U6@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #71615 |
On 24/12/2024 9:24 pm, Daniel70 wrote:
> Rod Speed wrote on 23/12/24 5:19 pm:
>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 16:32:47 +1100, Trevor Wilson
>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:
>>> On 23/12/2024 3:44 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:58:40 +1100, Trevor Wilson
>>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:
>>>>> On 23/12/2024 2:00 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>>> Xeno wrote:
>>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 11:17 am, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>>>>> alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Get the facts. radio interview I recorded with Chris Uhlmann,
>>>>>>>>>> award winning journalist and Sky News Political Contributor
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://auslink.info/audio/netzero.mp4 (20Kb)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> or watch the documentary ..
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbxpieEQ7bc
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Why would anyone interested in this subject bother with a piece
>>>>>>>>> by a political journalist & produced by Murdoch? Try finding
>>>>>>>>> something by qualified experts in the subject.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> so everything that was said is wrong or a lie, is that it?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Depends on what is omitted as much as what is said.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> anyhow, Dutton will solve the problem when he becomes PM by
>>>>>> building nuclear power plants
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Bullshit. Dutton will build exactly ZERO nukes. He will FINALLY
>>>>> crunch the numbers and admit that they are way too expensive.
>>
>>>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always.
>>
>>> Nope. Fact.
>>
>> Can't be a fact until it happens and it won't happen, you watch
>>
>>> Dutton will find out just how much nukes cost and will then announce
>>> that he will not build them.
>>
>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always.
>>
>>> He will build gas and coal fired power stations instead, because they
>>> are way cheaper,
>>
>> And aren't viable for anything like as long.
>>
>>> Gina wants him to and he doesn't give a crap about CO2 emissions.
>>
>> Because even if we shut down everything which produces any CO2
>> including that produced in the manufacture of renewables and the
>> concrete used in the stupid wind towers, it would have no measurabe
>> effect what so ever of world climate or even world CO2 levels because
>> we produce fuck all of that compare with what the rest of the world
>> does and will continue to do forever.
>
> You are correct ... to an extent, Roddles. Last I heard/read Australia
> was producing about 1.25% of the total CO2 even though our population is
> only approx 0.43% of the worlds population. Maybe that 1.25% figure
> includes the CO2 we produce in mining stuff which we then sell to others.
>
> In any case, if the rest of the Worlds population don't (also) take
> measures to reduce the increasing atmospheric CO2, WE (AUSTRALIA) WILL
> SUFFER, TOO!!
Yep, if we don't set an example, to the third world it looks as if we've
had our run at industrialisation, caused all the problems and are now
going to stop theirs. Leading by example is the thought that comes to
mind here.
--
Xeno
Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-25 00:09 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <vkebqr$1s8dq$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #71621 |
Xeno wrote on 24/12/24 9:43 pm: > On 24/12/2024 9:24 pm, Daniel70 wrote: >> Rod Speed wrote on 23/12/24 5:19 pm: >>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 16:32:47 +1100, Trevor Wilson >>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: <Snip> >>>> Gina wants him to and he doesn't give a crap about CO2 emissions. >>> >>> Because even if we shut down everything which produces any CO2 >>> including that produced in the manufacture of renewables and the >>> concrete used in the stupid wind towers, it would have no measurabe >>> effect what so ever of world climate or even world CO2 levels because >>> we produce fuck all of that compare with what the rest of the world >>> does and will continue to do forever. >> >> You are correct ... to an extent, Roddles. Last I heard/read Australia >> was producing about 1.25% of the total CO2 even though our population >> is only approx 0.43% of the worlds population. Maybe that 1.25% figure >> includes the CO2 we produce in mining stuff which we then sell to others. >> >> In any case, if the rest of the Worlds population don't (also) take >> measures to reduce the increasing atmospheric CO2, WE (AUSTRALIA) WILL >> SUFFER, TOO!! > > Yep, if we don't set an example, to the third world it looks as if we've > had our run at industrialisation, caused all the problems and are now > going to stop theirs. Leading by example is the thought that comes to > mind here. > Yeap! -- Daniel
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-25 07:27 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <op.2zawghqxbyq249@pvr2.lan> |
| In reply to | #71621 |
On Tue, 24 Dec 2024 21:43:16 +1100, Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> wrote: > On 24/12/2024 9:24 pm, Daniel70 wrote: >> Rod Speed wrote on 23/12/24 5:19 pm: >>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 16:32:47 +1100, Trevor Wilson >>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >>>> On 23/12/2024 3:44 pm, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:58:40 +1100, Trevor Wilson >>>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >>>>>> On 23/12/2024 2:00 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>> Xeno wrote: >>>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 11:17 am, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>> alvey wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Get the facts. radio interview I recorded with Chris Uhlmann, >>>>>>>>>>> award winning journalist and Sky News Political Contributor >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> https://auslink.info/audio/netzero.mp4 (20Kb) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> or watch the documentary .. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbxpieEQ7bc >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Why would anyone interested in this subject bother with a piece >>>>>>>>>> by a political journalist & produced by Murdoch? Try finding >>>>>>>>>> something by qualified experts in the subject. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> so everything that was said is wrong or a lie, is that it? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Depends on what is omitted as much as what is said. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> anyhow, Dutton will solve the problem when he becomes PM by >>>>>>> building nuclear power plants >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Bullshit. Dutton will build exactly ZERO nukes. He will FINALLY >>>>>> crunch the numbers and admit that they are way too expensive. >>> >>>>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. >>> >>>> Nope. Fact. >>> >>> Can't be a fact until it happens and it won't happen, you watch >>> >>>> Dutton will find out just how much nukes cost and will then announce >>>> that he will not build them. >>> >>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. >>> >>>> He will build gas and coal fired power stations instead, because they >>>> are way cheaper, >>> >>> And aren't viable for anything like as long. >>> >>>> Gina wants him to and he doesn't give a crap about CO2 emissions. >>> >>> Because even if we shut down everything which produces any CO2 >>> including that produced in the manufacture of renewables and the >>> concrete used in the stupid wind towers, it would have no measurabe >>> effect what so ever of world climate or even world CO2 levels because >>> we produce fuck all of that compare with what the rest of the world >>> does and will continue to do forever. >> You are correct ... to an extent, Roddles. Last I heard/read Australia >> was producing about 1.25% of the total CO2 even though our population >> is only approx 0.43% of the worlds population. Maybe that 1.25% figure >> includes the CO2 we produce in mining stuff which we then sell to >> others. >> In any case, if the rest of the Worlds population don't (also) take >> measures to reduce the increasing atmospheric CO2, WE (AUSTRALIA) WILL >> SUFFER, TOO!! > > Yep, if we don't set an example, to the third world it looks as if we've > had our run at industrialisation, caused all the problems and are now > going to stop theirs. Leading by example is the thought that comes to > mind here. The third world doesnt give a flying red fuck what this country chooses to do
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-25 08:24 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <lt0n44F4pq9U5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #71633 |
On 25/12/2024 7:27 am, Rod Speed wrote: > On Tue, 24 Dec 2024 21:43:16 +1100, Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> wrote: > >> On 24/12/2024 9:24 pm, Daniel70 wrote: >>> Rod Speed wrote on 23/12/24 5:19 pm: >>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 16:32:47 +1100, Trevor Wilson >>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >>>>> On 23/12/2024 3:44 pm, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:58:40 +1100, Trevor Wilson >>>>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 2:00 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>> Xeno wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 11:17 am, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>> alvey wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Get the facts. radio interview I recorded with Chris >>>>>>>>>>>> Uhlmann, award winning journalist and Sky News Political >>>>>>>>>>>> Contributor >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://auslink.info/audio/netzero.mp4 (20Kb) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> or watch the documentary .. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbxpieEQ7bc >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Why would anyone interested in this subject bother with a >>>>>>>>>>> piece by a political journalist & produced by Murdoch? Try >>>>>>>>>>> finding something by qualified experts in the subject. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> so everything that was said is wrong or a lie, is that it? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Depends on what is omitted as much as what is said. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> anyhow, Dutton will solve the problem when he becomes PM by >>>>>>>> building nuclear power plants >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Bullshit. Dutton will build exactly ZERO nukes. He will FINALLY >>>>>>> crunch the numbers and admit that they are way too expensive. >>>> >>>>>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. >>>> >>>>> Nope. Fact. >>>> >>>> Can't be a fact until it happens and it won't happen, you watch >>>> >>>>> Dutton will find out just how much nukes cost and will then >>>>> announce that he will not build them. >>>> >>>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. >>>> >>>>> He will build gas and coal fired power stations instead, because >>>>> they are way cheaper, >>>> >>>> And aren't viable for anything like as long. >>>> >>>>> Gina wants him to and he doesn't give a crap about CO2 emissions. >>>> >>>> Because even if we shut down everything which produces any CO2 >>>> including that produced in the manufacture of renewables and the >>>> concrete used in the stupid wind towers, it would have no measurabe >>>> effect what so ever of world climate or even world CO2 levels because >>>> we produce fuck all of that compare with what the rest of the world >>>> does and will continue to do forever. >>> You are correct ... to an extent, Roddles. Last I heard/read >>> Australia was producing about 1.25% of the total CO2 even though our >>> population is only approx 0.43% of the worlds population. Maybe that >>> 1.25% figure includes the CO2 we produce in mining stuff which we >>> then sell to others. >>> In any case, if the rest of the Worlds population don't (also) take >>> measures to reduce the increasing atmospheric CO2, WE (AUSTRALIA) >>> WILL SUFFER, TOO!! >> >> Yep, if we don't set an example, to the third world it looks as if >> we've had our run at industrialisation, caused all the problems and >> are now going to stop theirs. Leading by example is the thought that >> comes to mind here. > > The third world doesnt give a flying red fuck what this country chooses > to do I also doubt that they look in this direction when looking for someone to follow. Having said that I still think that a slow steady reduction in our CO2 is a good thing as long as we don't destroy our way of life in doing so. -- Daryl
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-25 09:15 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <op.2za1gpiebyq249@pvr2.lan> |
| In reply to | #71638 |
On Wed, 25 Dec 2024 08:24:20 +1100, Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> wrote: > On 25/12/2024 7:27 am, Rod Speed wrote: >> On Tue, 24 Dec 2024 21:43:16 +1100, Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> >> wrote: >> >>> On 24/12/2024 9:24 pm, Daniel70 wrote: >>>> Rod Speed wrote on 23/12/24 5:19 pm: >>>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 16:32:47 +1100, Trevor Wilson >>>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >>>>>> On 23/12/2024 3:44 pm, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:58:40 +1100, Trevor Wilson >>>>>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 2:00 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>> Xeno wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 11:17 am, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> alvey wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Get the facts. radio interview I recorded with Chris >>>>>>>>>>>>> Uhlmann, award winning journalist and Sky News Political >>>>>>>>>>>>> Contributor >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://auslink.info/audio/netzero.mp4 (20Kb) >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> or watch the documentary .. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbxpieEQ7bc >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Why would anyone interested in this subject bother with a >>>>>>>>>>>> piece by a political journalist & produced by Murdoch? Try >>>>>>>>>>>> finding something by qualified experts in the subject. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> so everything that was said is wrong or a lie, is that it? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Depends on what is omitted as much as what is said. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> anyhow, Dutton will solve the problem when he becomes PM by >>>>>>>>> building nuclear power plants >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Bullshit. Dutton will build exactly ZERO nukes. He will FINALLY >>>>>>>> crunch the numbers and admit that they are way too expensive. >>>>> >>>>>>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. >>>>> >>>>>> Nope. Fact. >>>>> >>>>> Can't be a fact until it happens and it won't happen, you watch >>>>> >>>>>> Dutton will find out just how much nukes cost and will then >>>>>> announce that he will not build them. >>>>> >>>>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. >>>>> >>>>>> He will build gas and coal fired power stations instead, because >>>>>> they are way cheaper, >>>>> >>>>> And aren't viable for anything like as long. >>>>> >>>>>> Gina wants him to and he doesn't give a crap about CO2 emissions. >>>>> >>>>> Because even if we shut down everything which produces any CO2 >>>>> including that produced in the manufacture of renewables and the >>>>> concrete used in the stupid wind towers, it would have no measurabe >>>>> effect what so ever of world climate or even world CO2 levels because >>>>> we produce fuck all of that compare with what the rest of the world >>>>> does and will continue to do forever. >>>> You are correct ... to an extent, Roddles. Last I heard/read >>>> Australia was producing about 1.25% of the total CO2 even though our >>>> population is only approx 0.43% of the worlds population. Maybe that >>>> 1.25% figure includes the CO2 we produce in mining stuff which we >>>> then sell to others. >>>> In any case, if the rest of the Worlds population don't (also) take >>>> measures to reduce the increasing atmospheric CO2, WE (AUSTRALIA) >>>> WILL SUFFER, TOO!! >>> >>> Yep, if we don't set an example, to the third world it looks as if >>> we've had our run at industrialisation, caused all the problems and >>> are now going to stop theirs. Leading by example is the thought that >>> comes to mind here. >> The third world doesnt give a flying red fuck what this country >> chooses to do > > I also doubt that they look in this direction when looking for someone > to follow. > Having said that I still think that a slow steady reduction in our CO2 > is a good thing as long as we don't destroy our way of life in doing so. I'm not convinced that its worth doing, given that whatever we do will have no measurable effect what so ever on world CO2 levels or climate Certainly what you did house wise is worth doing, but that's because it saves you money and gives better comfort.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-25 10:53 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <lt0vrcF6a9lU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #71638 |
Daryl wrote: > On 25/12/2024 7:27 am, Rod Speed wrote: >> On Tue, 24 Dec 2024 21:43:16 +1100, Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> >> wrote: >> >>> On 24/12/2024 9:24 pm, Daniel70 wrote: >>>> Rod Speed wrote on 23/12/24 5:19 pm: >>>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 16:32:47 +1100, Trevor Wilson >>>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >>>>>> On 23/12/2024 3:44 pm, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:58:40 +1100, Trevor Wilson >>>>>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 2:00 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>> Xeno wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 11:17 am, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> alvey wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Get the facts. radio interview I recorded with Chris >>>>>>>>>>>>> Uhlmann, award winning journalist and Sky News Political >>>>>>>>>>>>> Contributor >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://auslink.info/audio/netzero.mp4 (20Kb) >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> or watch the documentary .. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbxpieEQ7bc >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Why would anyone interested in this subject bother with a >>>>>>>>>>>> piece by a political journalist & produced by Murdoch? Try >>>>>>>>>>>> finding something by qualified experts in the subject. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> so everything that was said is wrong or a lie, is that it? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Depends on what is omitted as much as what is said. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> anyhow, Dutton will solve the problem when he becomes PM by >>>>>>>>> building nuclear power plants >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Bullshit. Dutton will build exactly ZERO nukes. He will FINALLY >>>>>>>> crunch the numbers and admit that they are way too expensive. >>>>> >>>>>>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. >>>>> >>>>>> Nope. Fact. >>>>> >>>>> Can't be a fact until it happens and it won't happen, you watch >>>>> >>>>>> Dutton will find out just how much nukes cost and will then >>>>>> announce that he will not build them. >>>>> >>>>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. >>>>> >>>>>> He will build gas and coal fired power stations instead, because >>>>>> they are way cheaper, >>>>> >>>>> And aren't viable for anything like as long. >>>>> >>>>>> Gina wants him to and he doesn't give a crap about CO2 emissions. >>>>> >>>>> Because even if we shut down everything which produces any CO2 >>>>> including that produced in the manufacture of renewables and the >>>>> concrete used in the stupid wind towers, it would have no measurabe >>>>> effect what so ever of world climate or even world CO2 levels because >>>>> we produce fuck all of that compare with what the rest of the world >>>>> does and will continue to do forever. >>>> You are correct ... to an extent, Roddles. Last I heard/read >>>> Australia was producing about 1.25% of the total CO2 even though >>>> our population is only approx 0.43% of the worlds population. Maybe >>>> that 1.25% figure includes the CO2 we produce in mining stuff which >>>> we then sell to others. >>>> In any case, if the rest of the Worlds population don't (also) >>>> take measures to reduce the increasing atmospheric CO2, WE >>>> (AUSTRALIA) WILL SUFFER, TOO!! >>> >>> Yep, if we don't set an example, to the third world it looks as if >>> we've had our run at industrialisation, caused all the problems and >>> are now going to stop theirs. Leading by example is the thought that >>> comes to mind here. >> >> The third world doesnt give a flying red fuck what this country >> chooses to do > > I also doubt that they look in this direction when looking for someone > to follow. > Having said that I still think that a slow steady reduction in our CO2 > is a good thing as long as we don't destroy our way of life in doing so. > it's senseless to impose hardship on the Australian population when doing so has no effect at all on global warming -- Have a nice day!.. stay sane, be happy, and enjoy living.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-25 07:18 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <op.2zav1sgvbyq249@pvr2.lan> |
| In reply to | #71615 |
On Tue, 24 Dec 2024 21:24:20 +1100, Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > Rod Speed wrote on 23/12/24 5:19 pm: >> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 16:32:47 +1100, Trevor Wilson >> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >>> On 23/12/2024 3:44 pm, Rod Speed wrote: >>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:58:40 +1100, Trevor Wilson >>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >>>>> On 23/12/2024 2:00 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>> Xeno wrote: >>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 11:17 am, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>> alvey wrote: >>>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Get the facts. radio interview I recorded with Chris Uhlmann, >>>>>>>>>> award winning journalist and Sky News Political Contributor >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> https://auslink.info/audio/netzero.mp4 (20Kb) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> or watch the documentary .. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbxpieEQ7bc >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Why would anyone interested in this subject bother with a piece >>>>>>>>> by a political journalist & produced by Murdoch? Try finding >>>>>>>>> something by qualified experts in the subject. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> so everything that was said is wrong or a lie, is that it? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Depends on what is omitted as much as what is said. >>>>>>> >>>>>> anyhow, Dutton will solve the problem when he becomes PM by >>>>>> building nuclear power plants >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Bullshit. Dutton will build exactly ZERO nukes. He will FINALLY >>>>> crunch the numbers and admit that they are way too expensive. >> >>>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. >> >>> Nope. Fact. >> Can't be a fact until it happens and it won't happen, you watch >> >>> Dutton will find out just how much nukes cost and will then announce >>> that he will not build them. >> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. >> >>> He will build gas and coal fired power stations instead, because they >>> are way cheaper, >> And aren't viable for anything like as long. >> >>> Gina wants him to and he doesn't give a crap about CO2 emissions. >> Because even if we shut down everything which produces any CO2 >> including that produced in the manufacture of renewables and the >> concrete used in the stupid wind towers, it would have no measurabe >> effect what so ever of world climate or even world CO2 levels because >> we produce fuck all of that compare with what the rest of the world >> does and will continue to do forever. > You are correct ... to an extent, Roddles. Completely correct in fact. > Last I heard/read Australia was producing about 1.25% of the total CO2 > even though our population is only approx 0.43% of the worlds > population. Maybe that 1.25% figure includes the CO2 we produce in > mining stuff which we then sell to others. > In any case, if the rest of the Worlds population don't (also) take > measures to reduce the increasing atmospheric CO2, WE (AUSTRALIA) WILL > SUFFER, TOO!! No evidence of any suffering
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-25 22:25 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <vkgq3u$2ci9n$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #71630 |
Rod Speed wrote on 25/12/24 7:18 am: > On Tue, 24 Dec 2024 21:24:20 +1100, Daniel70 > <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > >> Rod Speed wrote on 23/12/24 5:19 pm: >>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 16:32:47 +1100, Trevor Wilson >>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >>>> On 23/12/2024 3:44 pm, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:58:40 +1100, Trevor Wilson >>>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >>>>>> On 23/12/2024 2:00 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>> Xeno wrote: >>>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 11:17 am, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>> alvey wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Get the facts. radio interview I recorded with Chris Uhlmann, >>>>>>>>>>> award winning journalist and Sky News Political Contributor >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> https://auslink.info/audio/netzero.mp4 (20Kb) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> or watch the documentary .. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbxpieEQ7bc >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Why would anyone interested in this subject bother with a >>>>>>>>>> piece by a political journalist & produced by Murdoch? Try >>>>>>>>>> finding something by qualified experts in the subject. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> so everything that was said is wrong or a lie, is that it? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Depends on what is omitted as much as what is said. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> anyhow, Dutton will solve the problem when he becomes PM by >>>>>>> building nuclear power plants >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Bullshit. Dutton will build exactly ZERO nukes. He will FINALLY >>>>>> crunch the numbers and admit that they are way too expensive. >>> >>>>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. >>> >>>> Nope. Fact. >>> Can't be a fact until it happens and it won't happen, you watch >>> >>>> Dutton will find out just how much nukes cost and will then announce >>>> that he will not build them. >>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. >>> >>>> He will build gas and coal fired power stations instead, because >>>> they are way cheaper, >>> And aren't viable for anything like as long. >>> >>>> Gina wants him to and he doesn't give a crap about CO2 emissions. >>> Because even if we shut down everything which produces any CO2 >>> including that produced in the manufacture of renewables and the >>> concrete used in the stupid wind towers, it would have no measurabe >>> effect what so ever of world climate or even world CO2 levels because >>> we produce fuck all of that compare with what the rest of the world >>> does and will continue to do forever. > >> You are correct ... to an extent, Roddles. > > Completely correct in fact. > >> Last I heard/read Australia was producing about 1.25% of the total CO2 >> even though our population is only approx 0.43% of the worlds >> population. Maybe that 1.25% figure includes the CO2 we produce in >> mining stuff which we then sell to others. > >> In any case, if the rest of the Worlds population don't (also) take >> measures to reduce the increasing atmospheric CO2, WE (AUSTRALIA) WILL >> SUFFER, TOO!! > > No evidence of any suffering Roddles, do you understand the meaning of the word "WILL"?? ... as in "WE (AUSTRALIA) WILL SUFFER, TOO!!"?? -- Daniel
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-26 04:53 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <op.2zcjzoyqbyq249@pvr2.lan> |
| In reply to | #71652 |
On Wed, 25 Dec 2024 22:25:57 +1100, Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > Rod Speed wrote on 25/12/24 7:18 am: >> On Tue, 24 Dec 2024 21:24:20 +1100, Daniel70 >> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >> >>> Rod Speed wrote on 23/12/24 5:19 pm: >>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 16:32:47 +1100, Trevor Wilson >>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >>>>> On 23/12/2024 3:44 pm, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:58:40 +1100, Trevor Wilson >>>>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 2:00 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>> Xeno wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 11:17 am, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>> alvey wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Get the facts. radio interview I recorded with Chris Uhlmann, >>>>>>>>>>>> award winning journalist and Sky News Political Contributor >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://auslink.info/audio/netzero.mp4 (20Kb) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> or watch the documentary .. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbxpieEQ7bc >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Why would anyone interested in this subject bother with a >>>>>>>>>>> piece by a political journalist & produced by Murdoch? Try >>>>>>>>>>> finding something by qualified experts in the subject. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> so everything that was said is wrong or a lie, is that it? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Depends on what is omitted as much as what is said. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> anyhow, Dutton will solve the problem when he becomes PM by >>>>>>>> building nuclear power plants >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Bullshit. Dutton will build exactly ZERO nukes. He will FINALLY >>>>>>> crunch the numbers and admit that they are way too expensive. >>>> >>>>>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. >>>> >>>>> Nope. Fact. >>>> Can't be a fact until it happens and it won't happen, you watch >>>> >>>>> Dutton will find out just how much nukes cost and will then announce >>>>> that he will not build them. >>>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. >>>> >>>>> He will build gas and coal fired power stations instead, because >>>>> they are way cheaper, >>>> And aren't viable for anything like as long. >>>> >>>>> Gina wants him to and he doesn't give a crap about CO2 emissions. >>>> Because even if we shut down everything which produces any CO2 >>>> including that produced in the manufacture of renewables and the >>>> concrete used in the stupid wind towers, it would have no measurabe >>>> effect what so ever of world climate or even world CO2 levels because >>>> we produce fuck all of that compare with what the rest of the world >>>> does and will continue to do forever. >> >>> You are correct ... to an extent, Roddles. >> Completely correct in fact. >> >>> Last I heard/read Australia was producing about 1.25% of the total CO2 >>> even though our population is only approx 0.43% of the worlds >>> population. Maybe that 1.25% figure includes the CO2 we produce in >>> mining stuff which we then sell to others. >> >>> In any case, if the rest of the Worlds population don't (also) take >>> measures to reduce the increasing atmospheric CO2, WE (AUSTRALIA) WILL >>> SUFFER, TOO!! >> No evidence of any suffering > Roddles, do you understand the meaning of the word "WILL"?? ... as in > "WE (AUSTRALIA) WILL SUFFER, TOO!!"?? We should have seen some suffering already if it was going to happen, fuckwit
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-26 20:52 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <vkj90s$2tus9$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #71655 |
Rod Speed wrote on 26/12/24 4:53 am: > On Wed, 25 Dec 2024 22:25:57 +1100, Daniel70 > <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >> Rod Speed wrote on 25/12/24 7:18 am: >>> On Tue, 24 Dec 2024 21:24:20 +1100, Daniel70 >>> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >>>> Rod Speed wrote on 23/12/24 5:19 pm: >>>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 16:32:47 +1100, Trevor Wilson >>>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >>>>>> On 23/12/2024 3:44 pm, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:58:40 +1100, Trevor Wilson >>>>>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: <Snip> >>>>>>>> Bullshit. Dutton will build exactly ZERO nukes. He will FINALLY >>>>>>>> crunch the numbers and admit that they are way too expensive. >>>>> >>>>>>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. >>>>> >>>>>> Nope. Fact. >>>>> Can't be a fact until it happens and it won't happen, you watch >>>>> >>>>>> Dutton will find out just how much nukes cost and will then >>>>>> announce that he will not build them. >>>>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. >>>>> >>>>>> He will build gas and coal fired power stations instead, because >>>>>> they are way cheaper, >>>>> And aren't viable for anything like as long. >>>>> >>>>>> Gina wants him to and he doesn't give a crap about CO2 emissions. >>>>> Because even if we shut down everything which produces any CO2 >>>>> including that produced in the manufacture of renewables and the >>>>> concrete used in the stupid wind towers, it would have no measurabe >>>>> effect what so ever of world climate or even world CO2 levels because >>>>> we produce fuck all of that compare with what the rest of the world >>>>> does and will continue to do forever. >>> >>>> You are correct ... to an extent, Roddles. >>> Completely correct in fact. >>> >>>> Last I heard/read Australia was producing about 1.25% of the total >>>> CO2 even though our population is only approx 0.43% of the worlds >>>> population. Maybe that 1.25% figure includes the CO2 we produce in >>>> mining stuff which we then sell to others. >>> >>>> In any case, if the rest of the Worlds population don't (also) take >>>> measures to reduce the increasing atmospheric CO2, WE (AUSTRALIA) >>>> WILL SUFFER, TOO!! > >>> No evidence of any suffering > >> Roddles, do you understand the meaning of the word "WILL"?? ... as in >> "WE (AUSTRALIA) WILL SUFFER, TOO!!"?? > > We should have seen some suffering already if it was going to happen, > fuckwit Oh!! And the Climatic conditions 'we' experience NOW are exactly the same as those experienced 50, 100, 250 years ago, are they, Roddles?? I think NOT!! -- Daniel
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-27 04:44 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <op.2zed7neybyq249@pvr2.lan> |
| In reply to | #71685 |
On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 20:52:35 +1100, Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > Rod Speed wrote on 26/12/24 4:53 am: >> On Wed, 25 Dec 2024 22:25:57 +1100, Daniel70 >> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >>> Rod Speed wrote on 25/12/24 7:18 am: >>>> On Tue, 24 Dec 2024 21:24:20 +1100, Daniel70 >>>> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >>>>> Rod Speed wrote on 23/12/24 5:19 pm: >>>>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 16:32:47 +1100, Trevor Wilson >>>>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 3:44 pm, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:58:40 +1100, Trevor Wilson >>>>>>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: > > <Snip> > >>>>>>>>> Bullshit. Dutton will build exactly ZERO nukes. He will FINALLY >>>>>>>>> crunch the numbers and admit that they are way too expensive. >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Nope. Fact. >>>>>> Can't be a fact until it happens and it won't happen, you watch >>>>>> >>>>>>> Dutton will find out just how much nukes cost and will then >>>>>>> announce that he will not build them. >>>>>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. >>>>>> >>>>>>> He will build gas and coal fired power stations instead, because >>>>>>> they are way cheaper, >>>>>> And aren't viable for anything like as long. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Gina wants him to and he doesn't give a crap about CO2 emissions. >>>>>> Because even if we shut down everything which produces any CO2 >>>>>> including that produced in the manufacture of renewables and the >>>>>> concrete used in the stupid wind towers, it would have no measurabe >>>>>> effect what so ever of world climate or even world CO2 levels >>>>>> because >>>>>> we produce fuck all of that compare with what the rest of the world >>>>>> does and will continue to do forever. >>>> >>>>> You are correct ... to an extent, Roddles. >>>> Completely correct in fact. >>>> >>>>> Last I heard/read Australia was producing about 1.25% of the total >>>>> CO2 even though our population is only approx 0.43% of the worlds >>>>> population. Maybe that 1.25% figure includes the CO2 we produce in >>>>> mining stuff which we then sell to others. >>>> >>>>> In any case, if the rest of the Worlds population don't (also) take >>>>> measures to reduce the increasing atmospheric CO2, WE (AUSTRALIA) >>>>> WILL SUFFER, TOO!! >> >>>> No evidence of any suffering >> >>> Roddles, do you understand the meaning of the word "WILL"?? ... as in >>> "WE (AUSTRALIA) WILL SUFFER, TOO!!"?? >> We should have seen some suffering already if it was going to happen, >> fuckwit > > Oh!! And the Climatic conditions 'we' experience NOW are exactly the > same as those experienced 50, 100, 250 years ago, are they, Roddles?? Fraid so. The impact of bushfires is only different because the population has increased so dramatically and we see a lot more houses built in forested areas than there ever used to be. > I think NOT!! Yep, nothing viable to 'think' with. That was proven when you proved you were completely stupid when you believed the ignorant line that some goon trainer ran that bullets fired from a horisontal gun rise before they fall.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 8 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | aus.computers
csiph-web