Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > aus.computers > #71508 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2024-12-21 11:50 +1100 |
| Last post | 2024-12-24 20:17 +1100 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 184 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to aus.computers
The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-21 11:50 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2024-12-21 14:15 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Noddy <me@home.com> - 2024-12-21 17:43 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-21 17:59 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-21 18:48 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2024-12-21 19:33 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-21 20:46 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2024-12-22 08:09 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Noddy <me@home.com> - 2024-12-22 09:41 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-22 00:08 +0000
Re: The real cost of net zero Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2024-12-22 11:39 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Noddy <me@home.com> - 2024-12-22 12:09 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-22 12:45 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2024-12-22 13:51 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Noddy <me@home.com> - 2024-12-22 16:13 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2024-12-22 16:22 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Noddy <me@home.com> - 2024-12-22 17:15 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-22 16:42 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> - 2024-12-23 07:34 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-23 13:02 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-22 12:35 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2024-12-22 13:29 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-22 13:41 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2024-12-22 15:27 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2024-12-22 18:31 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-22 18:33 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-23 11:43 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-23 11:38 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-23 13:13 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2024-12-23 13:40 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Noddy <me@home.com> - 2024-12-23 14:08 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-23 15:25 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Noddy <me@home.com> - 2024-12-23 14:08 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-23 15:26 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-23 15:40 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2024-12-23 16:30 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-23 17:14 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2024-12-23 19:24 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-23 20:25 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-12-23 21:00 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-24 05:35 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-24 22:58 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-24 23:13 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-25 07:31 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2024-12-25 08:28 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> - 2024-12-23 07:23 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-23 11:22 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> - 2024-12-23 11:21 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-23 13:57 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-23 15:16 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2024-12-23 18:07 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-24 15:53 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-24 18:41 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-24 19:48 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-24 20:07 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> - 2024-12-25 07:00 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-25 10:38 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-12-25 21:52 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 04:51 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-12-26 19:40 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 20:17 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 05:47 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-26 13:18 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 14:35 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero MightyMouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-26 16:06 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 15:14 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-12-26 19:48 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> - 2024-12-28 07:07 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-24 15:51 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-24 18:40 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-24 19:52 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2024-12-24 19:42 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-24 21:29 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-12-24 20:57 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-24 21:38 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-12-25 08:08 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-25 09:37 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 12:41 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-26 13:34 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-12-23 21:27 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> - 2024-12-23 07:16 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-23 11:17 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> - 2024-12-23 11:32 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-23 13:59 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-23 15:17 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-24 15:46 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-24 18:29 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2024-12-23 18:23 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-24 15:48 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> - 2024-12-24 15:40 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-24 20:00 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2024-12-24 19:11 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-24 20:16 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-12-24 21:07 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-24 21:40 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-25 07:16 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-12-25 22:02 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 04:52 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-12-26 19:55 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 20:19 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-26 21:11 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-27 04:39 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-12-27 19:36 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-27 20:07 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 05:51 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-26 11:42 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-26 13:22 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-26 13:39 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2024-12-24 20:34 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-24 21:46 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Noddy <me@home.com> - 2024-12-24 21:55 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-24 23:09 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Lindsay <lindsay00@nunnya.biz> - 2024-12-24 23:51 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> - 2024-12-25 07:20 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-25 10:51 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2024-12-25 18:50 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2024-12-26 16:29 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-26 18:25 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 18:00 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero MightyMouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-26 19:08 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-26 21:05 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 20:26 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-26 23:24 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Noddy <me@home.com> - 2024-12-26 19:44 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-26 21:08 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 20:40 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-26 22:08 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-26 23:26 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-26 23:46 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-12-27 19:53 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-26 18:33 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-25 07:24 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2024-12-25 08:20 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-25 10:43 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-23 13:03 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-23 14:00 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2024-12-23 14:58 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-23 15:26 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-23 15:44 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2024-12-23 16:32 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-23 17:19 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2024-12-24 12:29 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-24 13:10 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> - 2024-12-24 15:32 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-24 18:42 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-24 15:37 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-12-24 21:24 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-12-24 21:34 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-25 07:21 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-24 21:43 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-12-25 00:09 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-25 07:27 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2024-12-25 08:24 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-25 09:15 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-25 10:53 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-25 07:18 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-12-25 22:25 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 04:53 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-12-26 20:52 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-27 04:44 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-24 15:35 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-24 18:26 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-24 20:05 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2024-12-24 18:37 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-24 20:06 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> - 2024-12-25 07:41 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-25 09:27 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 06:03 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-26 13:25 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 14:16 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 15:18 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-26 16:31 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 17:40 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero MightyMouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-26 18:58 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2024-12-23 18:32 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-12-23 21:34 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-24 15:34 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-24 18:26 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-23 15:20 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2024-12-23 15:35 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-24 15:41 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-24 18:28 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2024-12-24 20:02 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-24 20:17 +1100
Page 9 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 Next page →
| From | Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-24 15:35 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <lsus0pFqegkU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #71568 |
Trevor Wilson wrote: > On 23/12/2024 3:44 pm, Rod Speed wrote: >> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:58:40 +1100, Trevor Wilson >> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >> >>> On 23/12/2024 2:00 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>> Xeno wrote: >>>>> On 23/12/2024 11:17 am, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>> alvey wrote: >>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Get the facts. radio interview I recorded with Chris Uhlmann, >>>>>>>> award winning journalist and Sky News Political Contributor >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://auslink.info/audio/netzero.mp4 (20Kb) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> or watch the documentary .. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbxpieEQ7bc >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why would anyone interested in this subject bother with a piece >>>>>>> by a political journalist & produced by Murdoch? Try finding >>>>>>> something by qualified experts in the subject. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> so everything that was said is wrong or a lie, is that it? >>>>> >>>>> Depends on what is omitted as much as what is said. >>>>> >>>> anyhow, Dutton will solve the problem when he becomes PM by >>>> building nuclear power plants >>>> >>> >>> Bullshit. Dutton will build exactly ZERO nukes. He will FINALLY >>> crunch the numbers and admit that they are way too expensive. >> >> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. > > **Nope. Fact. Dutton will find out just how much nukes cost and will > then announce that he will not build them. He will build gas and coal > fired power stations instead, because they are way cheaper, Gina wants > him to and he doesn't give a crap about CO2 emissions. > and why should he. our C02 emissions are one poofteenth of SFA -- Have a nice day!.. stay sane, be happy, and enjoy living.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-24 18:26 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <lsv61jFrrvnU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #71585 |
On 24/12/2024 3:35 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
> Trevor Wilson wrote:
>> On 23/12/2024 3:44 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:58:40 +1100, Trevor Wilson
>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 23/12/2024 2:00 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>> Xeno wrote:
>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 11:17 am, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>>>> alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Get the facts. radio interview I recorded with Chris Uhlmann,
>>>>>>>>> award winning journalist and Sky News Political Contributor
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://auslink.info/audio/netzero.mp4 (20Kb)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> or watch the documentary ..
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbxpieEQ7bc
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Why would anyone interested in this subject bother with a piece
>>>>>>>> by a political journalist & produced by Murdoch? Try finding
>>>>>>>> something by qualified experts in the subject.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> so everything that was said is wrong or a lie, is that it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Depends on what is omitted as much as what is said.
>>>>>>
>>>>> anyhow, Dutton will solve the problem when he becomes PM by
>>>>> building nuclear power plants
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bullshit. Dutton will build exactly ZERO nukes. He will FINALLY
>>>> crunch the numbers and admit that they are way too expensive.
>>>
>>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always.
>>
>> **Nope. Fact. Dutton will find out just how much nukes cost and will
>> then announce that he will not build them. He will build gas and coal
>> fired power stations instead, because they are way cheaper, Gina wants
>> him to and he doesn't give a crap about CO2 emissions.
>>
>
> and why should he. our C02 emissions are one poofteenth of SFA
>
Our CO2 emissions are way up there with the world's worst.
--
Xeno
Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-24 20:05 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <lsvbrhFsp5jU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #71595 |
Xeno wrote: > On 24/12/2024 3:35 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote: >> Trevor Wilson wrote: >>> On 23/12/2024 3:44 pm, Rod Speed wrote: >>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:58:40 +1100, Trevor Wilson >>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 23/12/2024 2:00 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>> Xeno wrote: >>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 11:17 am, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>> alvey wrote: >>>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Get the facts. radio interview I recorded with Chris Uhlmann, >>>>>>>>>> award winning journalist and Sky News Political Contributor >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> https://auslink.info/audio/netzero.mp4 (20Kb) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> or watch the documentary .. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbxpieEQ7bc >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Why would anyone interested in this subject bother with a >>>>>>>>> piece by a political journalist & produced by Murdoch? Try >>>>>>>>> finding something by qualified experts in the subject. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> so everything that was said is wrong or a lie, is that it? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Depends on what is omitted as much as what is said. >>>>>>> >>>>>> anyhow, Dutton will solve the problem when he becomes PM by >>>>>> building nuclear power plants >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Bullshit. Dutton will build exactly ZERO nukes. He will FINALLY >>>>> crunch the numbers and admit that they are way too expensive. >>>> >>>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. >>> >>> **Nope. Fact. Dutton will find out just how much nukes cost and will >>> then announce that he will not build them. He will build gas and >>> coal fired power stations instead, because they are way cheaper, >>> Gina wants him to and he doesn't give a crap about CO2 emissions. >>> >> >> and why should he. our C02 emissions are one poofteenth of SFA >> > Our CO2 emissions are way up there with the world's worst. > nup,1.02%. https://www.worldometers.info/co2-emissions/co2-emissions-by-country -- Have a nice day!.. stay sane, be happy, and enjoy living.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | alvey <Factman@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-24 18:37 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <vkdrrm$1ole8$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #71585 |
Mighty Mouse wrote: > Trevor Wilson wrote: >> On 23/12/2024 3:44 pm, Rod Speed wrote: >>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:58:40 +1100, Trevor Wilson >>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >>> >>>> On 23/12/2024 2:00 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>> Xeno wrote: >>>>>> On 23/12/2024 11:17 am, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>> alvey wrote: >>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Get the facts. radio interview I recorded with Chris Uhlmann, >>>>>>>>> award winning journalist and Sky News Political Contributor >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://auslink.info/audio/netzero.mp4 (20Kb) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> or watch the documentary .. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbxpieEQ7bc >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Why would anyone interested in this subject bother with a piece >>>>>>>> by a political journalist & produced by Murdoch? Try finding >>>>>>>> something by qualified experts in the subject. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> so everything that was said is wrong or a lie, is that it? >>>>>> >>>>>> Depends on what is omitted as much as what is said. >>>>>> >>>>> anyhow, Dutton will solve the problem when he becomes PM by >>>>> building nuclear power plants >>>>> >>>> >>>> Bullshit. Dutton will build exactly ZERO nukes. He will FINALLY >>>> crunch the numbers and admit that they are way too expensive. >>> >>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. >> >> **Nope. Fact. Dutton will find out just how much nukes cost and will >> then announce that he will not build them. He will build gas and coal >> fired power stations instead, because they are way cheaper, Gina wants >> him to and he doesn't give a crap about CO2 emissions. >> > > and why should he. our C02 emissions are one poofteenth of SFA As per your recent video/propaganda piece, adjectives aren't worth 2.5g of poo compared to actual numbers. Sooo, rather than the useless boganism, "poofteenth" what actual figure would you guess is Australias' %age contribution of global CO2 output? Oty. alvey -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-24 20:06 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <lsvbssFsp5jU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #71601 |
alvey wrote: > Mighty Mouse wrote: >> Trevor Wilson wrote: >>> On 23/12/2024 3:44 pm, Rod Speed wrote: >>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:58:40 +1100, Trevor Wilson >>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 23/12/2024 2:00 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>> Xeno wrote: >>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 11:17 am, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>> alvey wrote: >>>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Get the facts. radio interview I recorded with Chris Uhlmann, >>>>>>>>>> award winning journalist and Sky News Political Contributor >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> https://auslink.info/audio/netzero.mp4 (20Kb) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> or watch the documentary .. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbxpieEQ7bc >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Why would anyone interested in this subject bother with a >>>>>>>>> piece by a political journalist & produced by Murdoch? Try >>>>>>>>> finding something by qualified experts in the subject. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> so everything that was said is wrong or a lie, is that it? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Depends on what is omitted as much as what is said. >>>>>>> >>>>>> anyhow, Dutton will solve the problem when he becomes PM by >>>>>> building nuclear power plants >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Bullshit. Dutton will build exactly ZERO nukes. He will FINALLY >>>>> crunch the numbers and admit that they are way too expensive. >>>> >>>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. >>> >>> **Nope. Fact. Dutton will find out just how much nukes cost and will >>> then announce that he will not build them. He will build gas and >>> coal fired power stations instead, because they are way cheaper, >>> Gina wants him to and he doesn't give a crap about CO2 emissions. >>> >> >> and why should he. our C02 emissions are one poofteenth of SFA > > As per your recent video/propaganda piece, adjectives aren't worth > 2.5g of poo compared to actual numbers. Sooo, rather than the useless > boganism, "poofteenth" what actual figure would you guess is > Australias' %age contribution of global CO2 output? > > Oty. > no need to guess .. https://www.worldometers.info/co2-emissions/co2-emissions-by-country > > alvey > > -- Have a nice day!.. stay sane, be happy, and enjoy living.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-25 07:41 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <vkf9q3$21kmq$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #71607 |
Mighty Mouse wrote: > alvey wrote: >> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>> Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>> On 23/12/2024 3:44 pm, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:58:40 +1100, Trevor Wilson >>>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 23/12/2024 2:00 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>> Xeno wrote: >>>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 11:17 am, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>> alvey wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Get the facts. radio interview I recorded with Chris Uhlmann, >>>>>>>>>>> award winning journalist and Sky News Political Contributor >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> https://auslink.info/audio/netzero.mp4 (20Kb) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> or watch the documentary .. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbxpieEQ7bc >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Why would anyone interested in this subject bother with a >>>>>>>>>> piece by a political journalist & produced by Murdoch? Try >>>>>>>>>> finding something by qualified experts in the subject. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> so everything that was said is wrong or a lie, is that it? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Depends on what is omitted as much as what is said. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> anyhow, Dutton will solve the problem when he becomes PM by >>>>>>> building nuclear power plants >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Bullshit. Dutton will build exactly ZERO nukes. He will FINALLY >>>>>> crunch the numbers and admit that they are way too expensive. >>>>> >>>>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. >>>> >>>> **Nope. Fact. Dutton will find out just how much nukes cost and will >>>> then announce that he will not build them. He will build gas and >>>> coal fired power stations instead, because they are way cheaper, >>>> Gina wants him to and he doesn't give a crap about CO2 emissions. >>>> >>> >>> and why should he. our C02 emissions are one poofteenth of SFA >> >> As per your recent video/propaganda piece, adjectives aren't worth >> 2.5g of poo compared to actual numbers. Sooo, rather than the useless >> boganism, "poofteenth" what actual figure would you guess is >> Australias' %age contribution of global CO2 output? >> >> Oty. >> > > no need to guess .. > https://www.worldometers.info/co2-emissions/co2-emissions-by-country Ok, a couple of things... Australia is actually responsible for around 4.5% of global CO2 emissions, 80% of which is down to our fossil fuel export. (a) Theoretically, but *extremely* unlikely, we could ban the export of this stuff. As I say, I doubt very much that this could happen, I'm pointing it out to you Murdoch mouthpieces who chant, "There's nothing we can do that would have any effect" as a counterpoint. On your link, which figure(s) on the 'Straya line are, "one poofteenth of SFA"? alvey (a) https://tinyurl.com/nvp6jkt9
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-25 09:27 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <op.2za1z8x1byq249@pvr2.lan> |
| In reply to | #71640 |
On Wed, 25 Dec 2024 08:41:19 +1100, alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> wrote: > Mighty Mouse wrote: >> alvey wrote: >>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>> Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>> On 23/12/2024 3:44 pm, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:58:40 +1100, Trevor Wilson >>>>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 2:00 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>> Xeno wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 11:17 am, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>> alvey wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Get the facts. radio interview I recorded with Chris Uhlmann, >>>>>>>>>>>> award winning journalist and Sky News Political Contributor >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://auslink.info/audio/netzero.mp4 (20Kb) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> or watch the documentary .. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbxpieEQ7bc >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Why would anyone interested in this subject bother with a >>>>>>>>>>> piece by a political journalist & produced by Murdoch? Try >>>>>>>>>>> finding something by qualified experts in the subject. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> so everything that was said is wrong or a lie, is that it? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Depends on what is omitted as much as what is said. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> anyhow, Dutton will solve the problem when he becomes PM by >>>>>>>> building nuclear power plants >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Bullshit. Dutton will build exactly ZERO nukes. He will FINALLY >>>>>>> crunch the numbers and admit that they are way too expensive. >>>>>> >>>>>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. >>>>> >>>>> **Nope. Fact. Dutton will find out just how much nukes cost and will >>>>> then announce that he will not build them. He will build gas and >>>>> coal fired power stations instead, because they are way cheaper, >>>>> Gina wants him to and he doesn't give a crap about CO2 emissions. >>>>> >>>> >>>> and why should he. our C02 emissions are one poofteenth of SFA >>> >>> As per your recent video/propaganda piece, adjectives aren't worth >>> 2.5g of poo compared to actual numbers. Sooo, rather than the useless >>> boganism, "poofteenth" what actual figure would you guess is >>> Australias' %age contribution of global CO2 output? >>> >>> Oty. >>> >> no need to guess .. >> https://www.worldometers.info/co2-emissions/co2-emissions-by-country > > Ok, a couple of things... > Australia is actually responsible for around 4.5% of global CO2 > emissions, Wrong, its actually 1% https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_carbon_dioxide_emissions#Fossil_CO2_emissions_by_country/territory 80% of which is down to our fossil fuel export. (a) That's a bogus number given that we aren't going to ban the export of coal > Theoretically, but *extremely* unlikely, we could ban the export of this > stuff. As I say, I doubt very much that this could happen, I'm pointing > it out to you Murdoch mouthpieces who chant, "There's nothing we can do > that would have any effect" as a counterpoint. Nothing to do with Murdoch, its an undeniable fact > On your link, which figure(s) on the 'Straya line are, "one poofteenth > of SFA"? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_carbon_dioxide_emissions#Fossil_CO2_emissions_by_country/territory > (a) https://tinyurl.com/nvp6jkt9
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-26 06:03 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <vkhoeo$2hldf$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #71640 |
alvey wrote: > Mighty Mouse wrote: >> alvey wrote: >>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>> Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>> On 23/12/2024 3:44 pm, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:58:40 +1100, Trevor Wilson >>>>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 2:00 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>> Xeno wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 11:17 am, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>> alvey wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Get the facts. radio interview I recorded with Chris >>>>>>>>>>>> Uhlmann, award winning journalist and Sky News Political >>>>>>>>>>>> Contributor >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://auslink.info/audio/netzero.mp4 (20Kb) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> or watch the documentary .. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbxpieEQ7bc >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Why would anyone interested in this subject bother with a >>>>>>>>>>> piece by a political journalist & produced by Murdoch? Try >>>>>>>>>>> finding something by qualified experts in the subject. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> so everything that was said is wrong or a lie, is that it? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Depends on what is omitted as much as what is said. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> anyhow, Dutton will solve the problem when he becomes PM by >>>>>>>> building nuclear power plants >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Bullshit. Dutton will build exactly ZERO nukes. He will FINALLY >>>>>>> crunch the numbers and admit that they are way too expensive. >>>>>> >>>>>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. >>>>> >>>>> **Nope. Fact. Dutton will find out just how much nukes cost and >>>>> will then announce that he will not build them. He will build gas >>>>> and coal fired power stations instead, because they are way >>>>> cheaper, Gina wants him to and he doesn't give a crap about CO2 >>>>> emissions. >>>>> >>>> >>>> and why should he. our C02 emissions are one poofteenth of SFA >>> >>> As per your recent video/propaganda piece, adjectives aren't worth >>> 2.5g of poo compared to actual numbers. Sooo, rather than the useless >>> boganism, "poofteenth" what actual figure would you guess is >>> Australias' %age contribution of global CO2 output? >>> >>> Oty. >>> >> >> no need to guess .. >> https://www.worldometers.info/co2-emissions/co2-emissions-by-country > > Ok, a couple of things... > > Australia is actually responsible for around 4.5% of global CO2 > emissions, 80% of which is down to our fossil fuel export. (a) > Theoretically, but *extremely* unlikely, we could ban the export of this > stuff. As I say, I doubt very much that this could happen, I'm pointing > it out to you Murdoch mouthpieces who chant, "There's nothing we can do > that would have any effect" as a counterpoint. > > On your link, which figure(s) on the 'Straya line are, "one poofteenth > of SFA"? Still waiting for your answer on this felix. > > alvey > (a) https://tinyurl.com/nvp6jkt9 > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-26 13:25 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <lt3t4mFkc10U3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #71658 |
alvey wrote: > alvey wrote: >> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>> alvey wrote: >>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>> Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>> On 23/12/2024 3:44 pm, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:58:40 +1100, Trevor Wilson >>>>>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 2:00 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>> Xeno wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 11:17 am, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> alvey wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Get the facts. radio interview I recorded with Chris >>>>>>>>>>>>> Uhlmann, award winning journalist and Sky News Political >>>>>>>>>>>>> Contributor >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://auslink.info/audio/netzero.mp4 (20Kb) >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> or watch the documentary .. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbxpieEQ7bc >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Why would anyone interested in this subject bother with a >>>>>>>>>>>> piece by a political journalist & produced by Murdoch? Try >>>>>>>>>>>> finding something by qualified experts in the subject. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> so everything that was said is wrong or a lie, is that it? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Depends on what is omitted as much as what is said. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> anyhow, Dutton will solve the problem when he becomes PM by >>>>>>>>> building nuclear power plants >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Bullshit. Dutton will build exactly ZERO nukes. He will FINALLY >>>>>>>> crunch the numbers and admit that they are way too expensive. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. >>>>>> >>>>>> **Nope. Fact. Dutton will find out just how much nukes cost and >>>>>> will then announce that he will not build them. He will build gas >>>>>> and coal fired power stations instead, because they are way >>>>>> cheaper, Gina wants him to and he doesn't give a crap about CO2 >>>>>> emissions. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> and why should he. our C02 emissions are one poofteenth of SFA >>>> >>>> As per your recent video/propaganda piece, adjectives aren't worth >>>> 2.5g of poo compared to actual numbers. Sooo, rather than the >>>> useless boganism, "poofteenth" what actual figure would you guess >>>> is Australias' %age contribution of global CO2 output? >>>> >>>> Oty. >>>> >>> >>> no need to guess .. >>> https://www.worldometers.info/co2-emissions/co2-emissions-by-country >> >> Ok, a couple of things... >> >> Australia is actually responsible for around 4.5% of global CO2 >> emissions, 80% of which is down to our fossil fuel export. (a) >> Theoretically, but *extremely* unlikely, we could ban the export of >> this stuff. As I say, I doubt very much that this could happen, I'm >> pointing it out to you Murdoch mouthpieces who chant, "There's >> nothing we can do that would have any effect" as a counterpoint. >> >> On your link, which figure(s) on the 'Straya line are, "one >> poofteenth of SFA"? > > Still waiting for your answer on this felix. > > > number 16. isn't it obvious? > >> >> alvey >> (a) https://tinyurl.com/nvp6jkt9 >> >> > -- Have a nice day!.. stay sane, be happy, and enjoy living.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | alvey <Factman@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-26 14:16 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <vkilbq$2q9a6$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #71663 |
Mighty Mouse wrote: > alvey wrote: >> alvey wrote: >>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>> alvey wrote: >>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>> Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 3:44 pm, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:58:40 +1100, Trevor Wilson >>>>>>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 2:00 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Xeno wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 11:17 am, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> alvey wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Get the facts. radio interview I recorded with Chris >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Uhlmann, award winning journalist and Sky News Political >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Contributor >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://auslink.info/audio/netzero.mp4 (20Kb) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> or watch the documentary .. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbxpieEQ7bc >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Why would anyone interested in this subject bother with a >>>>>>>>>>>>> piece by a political journalist & produced by Murdoch? Try >>>>>>>>>>>>> finding something by qualified experts in the subject. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> so everything that was said is wrong or a lie, is that it? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Depends on what is omitted as much as what is said. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> anyhow, Dutton will solve the problem when he becomes PM by >>>>>>>>>> building nuclear power plants >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Bullshit. Dutton will build exactly ZERO nukes. He will FINALLY >>>>>>>>> crunch the numbers and admit that they are way too expensive. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> **Nope. Fact. Dutton will find out just how much nukes cost and >>>>>>> will then announce that he will not build them. He will build gas >>>>>>> and coal fired power stations instead, because they are way >>>>>>> cheaper, Gina wants him to and he doesn't give a crap about CO2 >>>>>>> emissions. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> and why should he. our C02 emissions are one poofteenth of SFA >>>>> >>>>> As per your recent video/propaganda piece, adjectives aren't worth >>>>> 2.5g of poo compared to actual numbers. Sooo, rather than the >>>>> useless boganism, "poofteenth" what actual figure would you guess >>>>> is Australias' %age contribution of global CO2 output? >>>>> >>>>> Oty. >>>>> >>>> >>>> no need to guess .. >>>> https://www.worldometers.info/co2-emissions/co2-emissions-by-country >>> >>> Ok, a couple of things... >>> >>> Australia is actually responsible for around 4.5% of global CO2 >>> emissions, 80% of which is down to our fossil fuel export. (a) >>> Theoretically, but *extremely* unlikely, we could ban the export of >>> this stuff. As I say, I doubt very much that this could happen, I'm >>> pointing it out to you Murdoch mouthpieces who chant, "There's >>> nothing we can do that would have any effect" as a counterpoint. >>> >>> On your link, which figure(s) on the 'Straya line are, "one >>> poofteenth of SFA"? >> >> Still waiting for your answer on this felix. >> >> >> > > number 16. isn't it obvious? Well, No. If #16 is "one poofteenth of SFA" then your scale is bizarre. #16 on that list means that Oz is in the *top* decile. So you'll be revising your opinion of what Australia's contribution is then? alvey Incidentally, one of the leading loudmouths in perpetrating this lie about Ozs' contribution being "one poofteenth of SFA" is, no, not the Bumhole (Vic) Boofhead. It's a far more influential right-wing ratbag who's current facing a mass of paedo charges. Alan Jones. His infamous 'grain of rice' piece on TV was disgraceful. > >> >>> >>> alvey >>> (a) https://tinyurl.com/nvp6jkt9 >>> >>> >> > > -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | alvey <Factman@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-26 15:18 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <vkioua$2qsf3$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #71666 |
alvey wrote: > Mighty Mouse wrote: >> alvey wrote: >>> alvey wrote: >>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>> alvey wrote: >>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>> Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 3:44 pm, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:58:40 +1100, Trevor Wilson >>>>>>>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 2:00 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Xeno wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 11:17 am, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> alvey wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Get the facts. radio interview I recorded with Chris >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Uhlmann, award winning journalist and Sky News Political >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Contributor >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://auslink.info/audio/netzero.mp4 (20Kb) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or watch the documentary .. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbxpieEQ7bc >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why would anyone interested in this subject bother with a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> piece by a political journalist & produced by Murdoch? Try >>>>>>>>>>>>>> finding something by qualified experts in the subject. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> so everything that was said is wrong or a lie, is that it? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Depends on what is omitted as much as what is said. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> anyhow, Dutton will solve the problem when he becomes PM by >>>>>>>>>>> building nuclear power plants >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Bullshit. Dutton will build exactly ZERO nukes. He will >>>>>>>>>> FINALLY crunch the numbers and admit that they are way too >>>>>>>>>> expensive. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> **Nope. Fact. Dutton will find out just how much nukes cost and >>>>>>>> will then announce that he will not build them. He will build >>>>>>>> gas and coal fired power stations instead, because they are way >>>>>>>> cheaper, Gina wants him to and he doesn't give a crap about CO2 >>>>>>>> emissions. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> and why should he. our C02 emissions are one poofteenth of SFA >>>>>> >>>>>> As per your recent video/propaganda piece, adjectives aren't worth >>>>>> 2.5g of poo compared to actual numbers. Sooo, rather than the >>>>>> useless boganism, "poofteenth" what actual figure would you guess >>>>>> is Australias' %age contribution of global CO2 output? >>>>>> >>>>>> Oty. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> no need to guess .. >>>>> https://www.worldometers.info/co2-emissions/co2-emissions-by-country >>>> >>>> Ok, a couple of things... >>>> >>>> Australia is actually responsible for around 4.5% of global CO2 >>>> emissions, 80% of which is down to our fossil fuel export. (a) >>>> Theoretically, but *extremely* unlikely, we could ban the export of >>>> this stuff. As I say, I doubt very much that this could happen, I'm >>>> pointing it out to you Murdoch mouthpieces who chant, "There's >>>> nothing we can do that would have any effect" as a counterpoint. >>>> >>>> On your link, which figure(s) on the 'Straya line are, "one >>>> poofteenth of SFA"? >>> >>> Still waiting for your answer on this felix. >>> >>> >>> >> >> number 16. isn't it obvious? > > Well, No. If #16 is "one poofteenth of SFA" then your scale is bizarre. > #16 on that list means that Oz is in the *top* decile. So you'll be > revising your opinion of what Australia's contribution is then? > No response then? -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-26 16:31 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <lt4820Flsi9U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #71666 |
On 26/12/2024 3:16 pm, alvey wrote:
> Mighty Mouse wrote:
>> alvey wrote:
>>> alvey wrote:
>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>> alvey wrote:
>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>>>> Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 3:44 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:58:40 +1100, Trevor Wilson
>>>>>>>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 2:00 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Xeno wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 11:17 am, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Get the facts. radio interview I recorded with Chris
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Uhlmann, award winning journalist and Sky News Political
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Contributor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://auslink.info/audio/netzero.mp4 (20Kb)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or watch the documentary ..
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbxpieEQ7bc
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why would anyone interested in this subject bother with a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piece by a political journalist & produced by Murdoch? Try
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> finding something by qualified experts in the subject.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> so everything that was said is wrong or a lie, is that it?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Depends on what is omitted as much as what is said.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> anyhow, Dutton will solve the problem when he becomes PM by
>>>>>>>>>>> building nuclear power plants
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Bullshit. Dutton will build exactly ZERO nukes. He will
>>>>>>>>>> FINALLY crunch the numbers and admit that they are way too
>>>>>>>>>> expensive.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> **Nope. Fact. Dutton will find out just how much nukes cost and
>>>>>>>> will then announce that he will not build them. He will build
>>>>>>>> gas and coal fired power stations instead, because they are way
>>>>>>>> cheaper, Gina wants him to and he doesn't give a crap about CO2
>>>>>>>> emissions.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and why should he. our C02 emissions are one poofteenth of SFA
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As per your recent video/propaganda piece, adjectives aren't worth
>>>>>> 2.5g of poo compared to actual numbers. Sooo, rather than the
>>>>>> useless boganism, "poofteenth" what actual figure would you guess
>>>>>> is Australias' %age contribution of global CO2 output?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oty.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> no need to guess .. https://www.worldometers.info/co2-emissions/
>>>>> co2-emissions-by-country
>>>>
>>>> Ok, a couple of things...
>>>>
>>>> Australia is actually responsible for around 4.5% of global CO2
>>>> emissions, 80% of which is down to our fossil fuel export. (a)
>>>> Theoretically, but *extremely* unlikely, we could ban the export of
>>>> this stuff. As I say, I doubt very much that this could happen, I'm
>>>> pointing it out to you Murdoch mouthpieces who chant, "There's
>>>> nothing we can do that would have any effect" as a counterpoint.
>>>>
>>>> On your link, which figure(s) on the 'Straya line are, "one
>>>> poofteenth of SFA"?
>>>
>>> Still waiting for your answer on this felix.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> number 16. isn't it obvious?
>
> Well, No. If #16 is "one poofteenth of SFA" then your scale is bizarre.
> #16 on that list means that Oz is in the *top* decile. So you'll be
> revising your opinion of what Australia's contribution is then?
>
I'm looking at the countries *below* Australia. It's a worry when we get
pipped at the post by, say, France, UK, Italy. We're even knocking on
the doors of Canada and South Korea. And South Korea doesn't even
*export* fossil fuels.
>
>
> alvey
> Incidentally, one of the leading loudmouths in perpetrating this lie
> about Ozs' contribution being "one poofteenth of SFA" is, no, not the
> Bumhole (Vic) Boofhead. It's a far more influential right-wing ratbag
> who's current facing a mass of paedo charges. Alan Jones. His infamous
> 'grain of rice' piece on TV was disgraceful.
Good to see that loudmouth get his comeuppance.
--
Xeno
Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | alvey <Factman@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-26 17:40 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <vkj19o$2sdf7$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #71671 |
Xeno wrote: > On 26/12/2024 3:16 pm, alvey wrote: >> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>> alvey wrote: >>>> alvey wrote: >>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>> alvey wrote: >>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>> Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 3:44 pm, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:58:40 +1100, Trevor Wilson >>>>>>>>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 2:00 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Xeno wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 11:17 am, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> alvey wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Get the facts. radio interview I recorded with Chris >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Uhlmann, award winning journalist and Sky News Political >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Contributor >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://auslink.info/audio/netzero.mp4 (20Kb) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or watch the documentary .. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbxpieEQ7bc >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why would anyone interested in this subject bother with a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piece by a political journalist & produced by Murdoch? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Try finding something by qualified experts in the subject. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> so everything that was said is wrong or a lie, is that it? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Depends on what is omitted as much as what is said. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> anyhow, Dutton will solve the problem when he becomes PM by >>>>>>>>>>>> building nuclear power plants >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Bullshit. Dutton will build exactly ZERO nukes. He will >>>>>>>>>>> FINALLY crunch the numbers and admit that they are way too >>>>>>>>>>> expensive. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> **Nope. Fact. Dutton will find out just how much nukes cost and >>>>>>>>> will then announce that he will not build them. He will build >>>>>>>>> gas and coal fired power stations instead, because they are way >>>>>>>>> cheaper, Gina wants him to and he doesn't give a crap about CO2 >>>>>>>>> emissions. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> and why should he. our C02 emissions are one poofteenth of SFA >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As per your recent video/propaganda piece, adjectives aren't >>>>>>> worth 2.5g of poo compared to actual numbers. Sooo, rather than >>>>>>> the useless boganism, "poofteenth" what actual figure would you >>>>>>> guess is Australias' %age contribution of global CO2 output? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Oty. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> no need to guess .. https://www.worldometers.info/co2-emissions/ >>>>>> co2-emissions-by-country >>>>> >>>>> Ok, a couple of things... >>>>> >>>>> Australia is actually responsible for around 4.5% of global CO2 >>>>> emissions, 80% of which is down to our fossil fuel export. (a) >>>>> Theoretically, but *extremely* unlikely, we could ban the export of >>>>> this stuff. As I say, I doubt very much that this could happen, I'm >>>>> pointing it out to you Murdoch mouthpieces who chant, "There's >>>>> nothing we can do that would have any effect" as a counterpoint. >>>>> >>>>> On your link, which figure(s) on the 'Straya line are, "one >>>>> poofteenth of SFA"? >>>> >>>> Still waiting for your answer on this felix. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> number 16. isn't it obvious? >> >> Well, No. If #16 is "one poofteenth of SFA" then your scale is >> bizarre. #16 on that list means that Oz is in the *top* decile. So >> you'll be revising your opinion of what Australia's contribution is then? >> > I'm looking at the countries *below* Australia. It's a worry when we get > pipped at the post by, say, France, UK, Italy. We're even knocking on > the doors of Canada and South Korea. Yep. It's extraordinary that this blurt about Oz CO2 output being 'a grain of rice in a bowlfull', or "a poofteenth of SFA" has ever been made. Extraordinary, but depressing. alvey -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | MightyMouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-26 18:58 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <lt4gljFn93iU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #71675 |
On 26/12/2024 6:40 pm, alvey wrote: > Xeno wrote: >> On 26/12/2024 3:16 pm, alvey wrote: >>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>> alvey wrote: >>>>> alvey wrote: >>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>> alvey wrote: >>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>> Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 3:44 pm, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:58:40 +1100, Trevor Wilson >>>>>>>>>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 2:00 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Xeno wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 11:17 am, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alvey wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Get the facts. radio interview I recorded with Chris >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Uhlmann, award winning journalist and Sky News >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Political Contributor >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://auslink.info/audio/netzero.mp4 (20Kb) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or watch the documentary .. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbxpieEQ7bc >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why would anyone interested in this subject bother with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a piece by a political journalist & produced by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Murdoch? Try finding something by qualified experts in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the subject. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so everything that was said is wrong or a lie, is that it? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Depends on what is omitted as much as what is said. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> anyhow, Dutton will solve the problem when he becomes PM >>>>>>>>>>>>> by building nuclear power plants >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Bullshit. Dutton will build exactly ZERO nukes. He will >>>>>>>>>>>> FINALLY crunch the numbers and admit that they are way too >>>>>>>>>>>> expensive. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> **Nope. Fact. Dutton will find out just how much nukes cost >>>>>>>>>> and will then announce that he will not build them. He will >>>>>>>>>> build gas and coal fired power stations instead, because they >>>>>>>>>> are way cheaper, Gina wants him to and he doesn't give a crap >>>>>>>>>> about CO2 emissions. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> and why should he. our C02 emissions are one poofteenth of SFA >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As per your recent video/propaganda piece, adjectives aren't >>>>>>>> worth 2.5g of poo compared to actual numbers. Sooo, rather than >>>>>>>> the useless boganism, "poofteenth" what actual figure would you >>>>>>>> guess is Australias' %age contribution of global CO2 output? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Oty. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> no need to guess .. https://www.worldometers.info/co2-emissions/ >>>>>>> co2-emissions-by-country >>>>>> >>>>>> Ok, a couple of things... >>>>>> >>>>>> Australia is actually responsible for around 4.5% of global CO2 >>>>>> emissions, 80% of which is down to our fossil fuel export. (a) >>>>>> Theoretically, but *extremely* unlikely, we could ban the export >>>>>> of this stuff. As I say, I doubt very much that this could >>>>>> happen, I'm pointing it out to you Murdoch mouthpieces who chant, >>>>>> "There's nothing we can do that would have any effect" as a >>>>>> counterpoint. >>>>>> >>>>>> On your link, which figure(s) on the 'Straya line are, "one >>>>>> poofteenth of SFA"? >>>>> >>>>> Still waiting for your answer on this felix. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> number 16. isn't it obvious? >>> >>> Well, No. If #16 is "one poofteenth of SFA" then your scale is >>> bizarre. #16 on that list means that Oz is in the *top* decile. So >>> you'll be revising your opinion of what Australia's contribution is >>> then? >>> >> I'm looking at the countries *below* Australia. It's a worry when we >> get pipped at the post by, say, France, UK, Italy. We're even >> knocking on the doors of Canada and South Korea. > > Yep. It's extraordinary that this blurt about Oz CO2 output being 'a > grain of rice in a bowlfull', or "a poofteenth of SFA" has ever been > made. Extraordinary, but depressing. > > how is 1.02% of the worlds pollution not that? > > alvey > > -- Have a nice day!.. stay sane, be happy, and enjoy living.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | alvey <Factman@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-23 18:32 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <vkb77j$14bap$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #71557 |
Trevor Wilson wrote: >> > > **Bullshit. Dutton will build exactly ZERO nukes. He will FINALLY crunch > the numbers and admit that they are way too expensive. He will then > commit to building more coal fired and gas power stations, as that is > the only solution for Australia that Dutton considers viable. I suspect that Dutton is being set-up to fail with the nuke idiocy. When it all goes pffft Angus Taylor will ascend. -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-23 21:34 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <vkbec3$15inp$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #71576 |
alvey wrote on 23/12/24 7:32 pm: > Trevor Wilson wrote: > >> **Bullshit. Dutton will build exactly ZERO nukes. He will FINALLY >> crunch the numbers and admit that they are way too expensive. He will >> then commit to building more coal fired and gas power stations, as >> that is the only solution for Australia that Dutton considers viable. > > I suspect that Dutton is being set-up to fail with the nuke idiocy. When > it all goes pffft Angus Taylor will ascend. > OH11 PLEASE, NO, NOT HIM!! -- Daniel
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-24 15:34 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <lsuru3FqegkU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #71557 |
Trevor Wilson wrote: > On 23/12/2024 2:00 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote: >> Xeno wrote: >>> On 23/12/2024 11:17 am, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>> alvey wrote: >>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Get the facts. radio interview I recorded with Chris Uhlmann, >>>>>> award winning journalist and Sky News Political Contributor >>>>>> >>>>>> https://auslink.info/audio/netzero.mp4 (20Kb) >>>>>> >>>>>> or watch the documentary .. >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbxpieEQ7bc >>>>> >>>>> Why would anyone interested in this subject bother with a piece by >>>>> a political journalist & produced by Murdoch? Try finding >>>>> something by qualified experts in the subject. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> so everything that was said is wrong or a lie, is that it? >>> >>> Depends on what is omitted as much as what is said. >>> >> >> anyhow, Dutton will solve the problem when he becomes PM by building >> nuclear power plants >> > > **Bullshit. Dutton will build exactly ZERO nukes. oh, you can tell the future?? can I have the winning numbers for Saturday's tattslotto please > He will FINALLY crunch the numbers and admit that they are way too > expensive. he already knows they're expensive to build, but provide cheap stable electricity supply long term > He will then commit to building more coal fired and gas power > stations, as that is the only solution for Australia that Dutton > considers viable. > well that would be good as well -- Have a nice day!.. stay sane, be happy, and enjoy living.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-24 18:26 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <lsv60cFrrvnU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #71584 |
On 24/12/2024 3:34 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
> Trevor Wilson wrote:
>> On 23/12/2024 2:00 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>> Xeno wrote:
>>>> On 23/12/2024 11:17 am, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>> alvey wrote:
>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Get the facts. radio interview I recorded with Chris Uhlmann,
>>>>>>> award winning journalist and Sky News Political Contributor
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://auslink.info/audio/netzero.mp4 (20Kb)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> or watch the documentary ..
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbxpieEQ7bc
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why would anyone interested in this subject bother with a piece by
>>>>>> a political journalist & produced by Murdoch? Try finding
>>>>>> something by qualified experts in the subject.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> so everything that was said is wrong or a lie, is that it?
>>>>
>>>> Depends on what is omitted as much as what is said.
>>>>
>>>
>>> anyhow, Dutton will solve the problem when he becomes PM by building
>>> nuclear power plants
>>>
>>
>> **Bullshit. Dutton will build exactly ZERO nukes.
>
> oh, you can tell the future?? can I have the winning numbers for
> Saturday's tattslotto please
Dutton is proposing to build technology that no one in the world has,
not a single *working* example of an SMR anywhere. Dutton is promising a
dream, nothing more, nothing less.
>
>> He will FINALLY crunch the numbers and admit that they are way too
>> expensive.
>
> he already knows they're expensive to build, but provide cheap stable
> electricity supply long term
The people are already complaining about their *cheap* electricity now.
When it doubles in cost because Dutton built a nuclear reactor, you
really think people are going to be concerned with a stable electricty
supply?
>
>> He will then commit to building more coal fired and gas power
>> stations, as that is the only solution for Australia that Dutton
>> considers viable.
>>
>
> well that would be good as well
>
Well, err, no, that wouldn't. Gas peaking would be the best *short term*
or *transition* option to replace coal, much more flexible too. It's
what they seem to be using in the NW of WA.
--
Xeno
Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-23 15:20 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <lss6nlFd56jU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #71554 |
On 23/12/2024 2:00 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
> Xeno wrote:
>> On 23/12/2024 11:17 am, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>> alvey wrote:
>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Get the facts. radio interview I recorded with Chris Uhlmann, award
>>>>> winning journalist and Sky News Political Contributor
>>>>>
>>>>> https://auslink.info/audio/netzero.mp4 (20Kb)
>>>>>
>>>>> or watch the documentary ..
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbxpieEQ7bc
>>>>
>>>> Why would anyone interested in this subject bother with a piece by a
>>>> political journalist & produced by Murdoch? Try finding something by
>>>> qualified experts in the subject.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> so everything that was said is wrong or a lie, is that it?
>>
>> Depends on what is omitted as much as what is said.
>>
>
> anyhow, Dutton will solve the problem when he becomes PM by building
> nuclear power plants
>
I hope you're not expecting to see them any time soon/your lifetime?
Nuclear power is like fast rail, roll it out at election time. Dutton
knows he will be long gone and not responsible *if* and when a single
sod is turned.
--
Xeno
Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-23 15:35 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <lss7l0FdahrU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #71560 |
On 23/12/2024 3:20 pm, Xeno wrote: > On 23/12/2024 2:00 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote: >> Xeno wrote: >>> On 23/12/2024 11:17 am, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>> alvey wrote: >>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Get the facts. radio interview I recorded with Chris Uhlmann, >>>>>> award winning journalist and Sky News Political Contributor >>>>>> >>>>>> https://auslink.info/audio/netzero.mp4 (20Kb) >>>>>> >>>>>> or watch the documentary .. >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbxpieEQ7bc >>>>> >>>>> Why would anyone interested in this subject bother with a piece by >>>>> a political journalist & produced by Murdoch? Try finding something >>>>> by qualified experts in the subject. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> so everything that was said is wrong or a lie, is that it? >>> >>> Depends on what is omitted as much as what is said. >>> >> >> anyhow, Dutton will solve the problem when he becomes PM by building >> nuclear power plants >> > I hope you're not expecting to see them any time soon/your lifetime? > > Nuclear power is like fast rail, roll it out at election time. Dutton > knows he will be long gone and not responsible *if* and when a single > sod is turned. > **Precisely. Dutton knows damned well that, IF he commits to building nukes, then he may not be alive when the first one comes on line. He certainly won't be in politics. He will have some cushy job given to him by Gina. Assuming, of course, that the fat cunt will be alive in 10 years. Which I doubt. -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 9 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | aus.computers
csiph-web