Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > aus.computers > #71336
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | aus.computers, aus.tv, aus.cars, aus.legal |
| Subject | Re: OT: US politics |
| Date | 2024-10-02 10:49 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <op.2uzoj4fhbyq249@pvr2.lan> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <j4enfjpkmnm76pop9dg6bhpgbpiaogflak@4ax.com> <op.2uyjk8c7byq249@pvr2.lan> <r6jnfj1bp0krqca9jjl8v101rt04if5g75@4ax.com> <op.2uy8n5xgbyq249@pvr2.lan> <4toofjplvc8k343dlmp4r9v2i0k0ts2ds3@4ax.com> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote > Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote: >> Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote >>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote >>>>> The BBC was siding with Argentina and France during the Falklands war >>>> BULLSHIT >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BBC_controversies#1979–2000 >> Doesnt say anything like what you claim. > That is where I copy and pasted it from And that says NOTHING about 'The BBC was siding with Argentina and France during the Falklands war' >>>>> "Our ABC" are the creepy same supporting Terrorist group Hezbollah >>>> BULLSHIT >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BBC_controversies#1979–2000 > >>>>> 1982: Falklands War >>>>> During the Falklands War, the Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and >>>>> some Conservative MPs believed that the BBC was excessively >>>>> even-handed between Britain and Argentina, referring to "the British" >>>>> and "the Argentines" instead of "our forces" and "the enemy". Even sillier, just different words, fuckwits. Thats not SIDING and doesnt even mention France. >>>> BULLSHIT >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BBC_controversies#1979–2000 >> Doesnt say what you claimed. > That is where I copy and pasted it from And that says NOTHING about 'The BBC was siding with Argentina and France during the Falklands war' >>>>>>> What is to happen when Australia's capital Washington, D.C. falls? >>>>>> Not going to happen >>>>> WWIII is already being fought the USA has over 50% of it navy in the >>>>> red Sea >>>> Nothing even remotely like a world war. >>> no? >> Nope. No ground forces for starters. Nothing even remotely >> like the first Gulf War either. Or the second one either. > No ground forces? There are none in the Navy, stupid. > Oh that's right, Kamala says USA don't have deployed troops anywhere > in the world under the watch of herself and Biden. Nothing even remotely like a WORLD WAR, stupid. > 10 hours ago one of hundreds of Another of your premature ejaculations. > "Just because some fool rag head claims something..." > <https://www.realcleardefense.com/articles/2024/10/01/how_many_us_troops_are_in_the_middle_east_1062050.html> > https://t.ly/1qMTX > WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. has increased its military presence in the > Middle East by several thousand troops, There were MILLIONS involved in the world wars, stupid. > sending an array of fighter > jets and other aircraft to bolster the protection of U.S. forces and > allies. They are actually there to shoot down missiles from Iran and the Houthi, stupid. > The decision brings the total number of American troops in the region > to as many as 43,000, including more than a dozen warships. So nothing even remotely like what the USA deployed outside the USA in the WORLD WARS, stupid. Or even the first gulf war, the second gulf war, Iraq etc etc etc. >> WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. has increased its military presence in the >> Middle East by several thousand troops, sending an array of fighter >> jets and other aircraft to bolster the protection of U.S. forces and >> allies. > The decision brings the total number of American troops in the region > to as many as 43,000, including more than a dozen warships. >>> https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/9/24/unimaginable-consequences-world-reacts-to-israels-strikes-on-lebanon >> >> Just because some fool rag head claims something... There you go again, completely fucking blotto already, first thing.
Back to aus.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: OT: US politics Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2024-10-01 15:13 +1000
Re: OT: US politics "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-10-01 17:05 +1000
Re: OT: US politics Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2024-10-01 19:28 +1000
Re: OT: US politics "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-10-01 20:04 +1000
Re: OT: US politics Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2024-10-01 20:23 +1000
Re: OT: US politics "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-10-02 05:05 +1000
Re: OT: US politics Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2024-10-02 07:26 +1000
Re: OT: US politics "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-10-02 10:49 +1000
Re: OT: US politics Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-10-01 18:32 +1000
Re: OT: US politics Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2024-10-01 19:38 +1000
csiph-web