Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > aus.cars > #395126 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Axel <none@not.here> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2026-08-23 16:38 +1000 |
| Last post | 2026-08-28 12:10 +1000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 869 — 11 participants |
Back to article view | Back to aus.cars
the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-08-23 16:38 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-08-23 20:42 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-23 21:50 +1000
Re: the Ford model T lindsay <lindsay@nuneya.biz> - 2026-08-23 22:18 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-08-24 12:08 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-08-24 13:22 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-24 13:42 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-08-24 15:05 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-24 17:20 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-08-24 17:46 +1000
Re: the Ford model T "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-08-24 18:12 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-08-24 19:36 +1000
Re: the Ford model T "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-08-24 19:45 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-08-24 20:24 +1000
Re: the Ford model T "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-08-25 02:53 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-08-25 21:20 +1000
Re: the Ford model T "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-08-26 03:30 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-08-26 06:13 +1000
Re: the Ford model T "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-08-26 07:00 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-08-26 15:32 +1000
Re: the Ford model T "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-08-26 15:58 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-08-24 22:06 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-08-24 22:03 +1000
Re: the Ford model T "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-08-25 02:52 +1000
Re: the Ford model T "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-08-25 03:16 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-24 19:26 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2026-08-24 19:11 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-24 13:39 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-08-25 10:23 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-25 11:03 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-08-25 11:44 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-25 13:39 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-08-25 15:47 +1000
Re: the Ford model T "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-08-25 16:33 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-08-25 17:59 +1000
Re: the Ford model T "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-08-25 18:43 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-08-25 23:04 +1000
Re: the Ford model T "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-08-26 03:37 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-08-26 07:34 +1000
Re: the Ford model T "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-08-26 09:06 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-08-26 12:57 +1000
Re: the Ford model T "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-08-26 13:31 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-08-26 15:39 +1000
Re: the Ford model T "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-08-26 16:01 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-08-26 17:05 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-08-26 13:03 +1000
Re: the Ford model T "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-08-26 13:43 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-08-26 14:50 +1000
Re: the Ford model T "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-08-26 15:06 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-08-26 15:40 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-08-25 20:52 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-08-25 22:54 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2026-08-26 09:30 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-08-26 10:48 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-26 12:06 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-08-26 14:33 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-08-26 20:12 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-26 20:39 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-08-27 10:17 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-26 12:03 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-26 19:48 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-08-27 12:17 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-27 12:41 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-08-27 13:43 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-27 15:51 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-08-27 12:48 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-08-27 13:41 +1000
Re: the Ford model T "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-08-27 14:58 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-08-27 17:45 +1000
Re: the Ford model T "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-08-27 17:55 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-08-27 19:25 +1000
Re: the Ford model T "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-08-28 03:35 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-08-28 19:20 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2026-08-27 13:35 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-26 19:48 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-08-27 14:06 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-08-24 18:59 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-08-24 19:14 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-08-24 19:38 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-08-24 22:00 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2026-08-24 19:15 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-08-24 20:09 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2026-08-24 22:23 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-24 23:11 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-08-30 17:19 +1000
Re: the Ford model T lindsay <lindsay@nuneya.biz> - 2026-08-30 18:09 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-08-30 18:48 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-08-30 20:01 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-08-30 20:36 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-08-30 18:47 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-30 20:37 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-08-30 20:51 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-30 21:24 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-08-31 09:15 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-31 11:30 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-08-31 13:47 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-08-31 15:25 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2026-08-30 21:40 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-24 23:02 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-08-25 10:23 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-08-25 21:00 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-25 21:16 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-08-24 20:28 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2026-08-24 22:20 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> - 2026-08-24 19:39 +0800
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-08-24 22:09 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-08-24 22:51 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-24 23:12 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-08-26 13:12 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> - 2026-08-24 20:58 +0800
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-24 23:09 +1000
Re: the Ford model T lindsay <lindsay@nuneya.biz> - 2026-08-25 11:56 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-08-25 21:02 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-08-24 21:58 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-08-24 22:54 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-24 23:13 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> - 2026-08-25 09:56 +0800
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-25 13:49 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-08-25 21:03 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-25 21:18 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> - 2026-08-27 03:58 +0800
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-08-27 07:51 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-27 09:30 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-08-27 10:31 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-08-27 11:23 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-08-27 12:03 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-08-27 21:20 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-27 21:36 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-08-28 18:08 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-28 20:26 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-27 02:09 +0000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-08-27 12:21 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-27 12:47 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2026-08-27 13:41 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-08-27 21:22 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-27 21:49 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-08-27 22:30 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-08-28 00:35 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2026-08-28 10:00 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-08-28 12:35 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-28 13:43 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> - 2026-09-01 16:38 +0800
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-01 19:40 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2026-09-01 22:31 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-01 23:31 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-01 23:52 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> - 2026-09-04 11:07 +0800
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-05 12:22 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-05 12:43 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> - 2026-09-05 12:55 +0800
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-05 20:43 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-06 11:11 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-05 20:44 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2026-09-06 09:49 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-06 09:58 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-08-28 18:18 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2026-08-28 09:51 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-08-28 12:07 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-08-28 12:38 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-28 13:45 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2026-08-27 22:08 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-27 22:34 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-08-28 12:08 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-08-28 12:40 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-28 13:47 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-08-28 18:38 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-28 22:44 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-28 13:41 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-08-28 14:45 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-08-28 20:31 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-28 20:39 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-08-27 21:21 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-27 21:48 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-08-28 18:40 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> - 2026-08-27 10:37 +0800
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-27 12:57 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-08-27 21:25 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-08-30 17:32 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-08-30 18:50 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-30 20:41 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-08-30 20:54 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-30 21:32 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2026-08-30 21:47 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-30 22:41 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-08-31 09:30 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-31 12:31 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-08-31 14:01 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2026-08-31 16:33 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-31 18:50 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-08-31 20:28 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-31 20:57 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-08-31 20:26 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-31 21:00 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-01 17:59 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-01 19:19 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-01 19:34 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-01 19:41 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-01 20:42 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-02 07:34 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-08-31 16:57 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-31 18:59 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-08-31 19:33 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-08-31 17:43 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-08-31 19:32 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2026-08-31 16:31 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-08-31 18:46 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-08-31 19:42 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2026-09-01 09:13 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-01 10:38 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-01 12:47 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-01 19:41 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-01 20:44 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-01 20:53 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-02 13:30 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2026-09-02 17:28 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-02 19:28 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-02 20:12 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-02 20:31 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-01 18:37 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-01 19:37 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-01 19:36 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-01 20:49 +1000
Re: the Ford model T lindsay <lindsay@nuneya.biz> - 2026-09-01 21:25 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-01 21:29 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-01 22:18 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-02 14:24 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2026-09-02 17:32 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-02 19:29 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-02 20:14 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-02 20:13 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2026-09-01 21:49 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-01 22:01 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-01 22:16 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-01 23:34 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-01 23:54 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-02 14:48 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-02 00:42 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-02 08:00 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2026-09-02 09:59 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-02 11:33 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-02 11:46 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-02 20:16 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2026-09-02 22:09 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-02 11:06 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-02 11:36 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-02 12:00 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-02 12:25 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-02 20:21 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-02 20:36 +1000
Re: the Ford model T lindsay <lindsay@nuneya.biz> - 2026-09-02 21:49 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-02 23:05 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2026-09-02 22:14 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-02 23:03 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-03 09:04 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-03 10:15 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-03 11:55 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-02 23:08 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-02 23:16 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-02 23:35 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-02 20:11 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-02 19:54 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-02 18:51 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-02 19:30 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-02 20:21 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-02 20:20 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-01 23:45 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-02 00:48 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-02 00:55 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-02 08:54 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-02 09:03 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-02 11:39 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-02 11:59 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-02 08:53 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-02 15:36 +1000
Re: the Ford model T lindsay <lindsay@nuneya.biz> - 2026-09-02 08:28 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-02 09:04 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2026-09-02 10:04 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-02 08:52 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-02 11:37 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-02 13:16 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2026-09-02 15:56 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-02 19:24 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-02 20:15 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-02 20:34 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-02 20:50 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-02 21:36 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2026-09-02 22:07 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-02 23:02 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-03 09:11 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-03 11:56 +1000
Re: the Ford model T lindsay <lindsay@nuneya.biz> - 2026-09-03 13:14 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-03 19:46 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-03 16:57 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-03 22:25 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-03 13:44 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-02 23:10 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-03 13:55 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-02 20:29 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-03 09:06 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-03 17:04 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-03 19:49 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-03 19:50 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-03 22:26 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-03 19:51 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-03 19:52 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-03 22:27 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-04 13:42 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-05 11:57 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-05 12:38 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-05 20:44 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-06 11:27 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-02 15:54 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-03 22:30 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-02 20:28 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-02 20:37 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-02 23:00 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-02 23:11 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-02 23:12 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-02 23:33 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-02 23:45 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-03 11:34 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-03 12:11 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-03 18:16 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-02 00:37 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-02 08:02 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-02 08:22 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-02 11:13 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-02 11:37 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-02 11:52 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-02 20:45 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-02 20:49 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-02 09:00 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-02 00:33 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-02 08:03 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-02 16:12 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-01 10:55 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-01 11:14 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-01 16:16 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-01 12:46 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-01 07:51 +0000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-01 19:37 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2026-09-01 21:53 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-01 22:01 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-02 07:28 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2026-09-02 09:52 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-01 19:45 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-01 18:32 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-08-31 20:31 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-01 12:41 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-01 18:43 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-01 19:21 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-01 19:46 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-31 18:47 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-08-31 19:44 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-31 20:14 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-01 12:35 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-01 19:39 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-02 00:05 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-02 09:02 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-02 11:42 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-02 20:44 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-02 23:05 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-02 23:30 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-03 09:13 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-01 19:48 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-01 21:29 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-08-31 20:31 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-31 20:43 +1000
Re: the Ford model T lindsay <lindsay@nuneya.biz> - 2026-08-31 22:35 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-01 12:39 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-01 17:08 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-01 19:17 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-01 19:48 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-02 00:26 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-02 08:04 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2026-09-02 10:03 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-02 11:44 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-02 12:04 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-02 16:41 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2026-09-02 13:11 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-02 16:29 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-02 11:11 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-02 11:46 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-02 12:07 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2026-09-02 13:16 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-02 19:15 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-02 20:00 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-02 20:29 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-02 20:52 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-02 23:16 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2026-09-02 22:03 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-02 23:00 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-02 23:14 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-02 23:31 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-03 18:34 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-02 22:47 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-02 23:18 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-02 23:22 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-02 23:37 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-02 23:48 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-03 00:00 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-03 11:57 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-03 12:35 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-02 17:33 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-02 20:58 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-02 09:06 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-02 11:25 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-02 11:53 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-02 13:26 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2026-09-02 17:25 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-02 19:27 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-02 19:23 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-02 20:09 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-02 20:37 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-02 20:45 +1000
Re: the Ford model T lindsay <lindsay@nuneya.biz> - 2026-09-02 21:57 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-02 23:19 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-02 23:08 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-02 23:17 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-02 23:39 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-02 23:56 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-03 11:41 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-03 11:58 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-03 12:13 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-03 08:35 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-03 09:48 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-03 09:52 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-03 12:28 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-03 20:16 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-02 21:08 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-02 21:54 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-02 22:24 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-02 23:07 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-03 08:55 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-03 12:31 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-03 20:25 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-02 23:21 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-02 23:26 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-03 17:21 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2026-09-02 22:18 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-02 23:05 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2026-09-02 22:05 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-02 22:39 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-02 23:09 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-02 23:27 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-02 23:41 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-03 11:50 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-03 12:18 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-03 12:36 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-03 17:32 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-03 20:02 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-03 21:22 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-04 17:50 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-04 19:10 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-04 18:27 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-04 19:29 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-04 20:24 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-05 10:04 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-05 10:06 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-05 11:58 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-05 13:30 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> - 2026-09-04 16:38 +0800
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-04 19:57 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-03 17:27 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-03 22:32 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-02 23:26 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-03 11:47 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-03 12:20 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-03 12:39 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-03 17:41 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-04 13:14 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-02 20:34 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-02 20:39 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-02 18:26 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-01 18:50 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-01 19:41 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-08-30 23:43 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-08-31 17:27 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-08-31 13:44 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-08-31 14:04 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-08-31 15:29 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-31 15:31 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-08-31 16:29 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-08-31 17:40 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-08-31 19:37 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-08-31 16:50 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-08-31 17:34 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-08-30 20:56 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-30 21:34 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-08-31 09:31 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-01 19:43 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> - 2026-08-27 09:54 +0800
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-08-27 21:26 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-08-28 18:45 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> - 2026-08-31 13:37 +0800
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-08-31 16:52 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-31 18:57 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-08-31 19:40 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-08-31 20:20 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-31 21:01 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> - 2026-09-01 11:00 +0800
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-01 19:37 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-01 20:50 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-02 00:28 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-02 07:51 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> - 2026-09-02 18:23 +0800
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-02 23:27 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-03 17:48 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> - 2026-09-03 21:58 +0800
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-04 00:23 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> - 2026-09-04 16:09 +0800
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-04 20:08 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-04 20:28 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-05 14:12 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-05 20:41 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-05 22:18 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-06 13:27 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-02 16:17 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> - 2026-09-02 18:20 +0800
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-02 23:04 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-02 23:12 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> - 2026-09-02 22:52 +0800
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-03 07:49 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-03 09:45 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> - 2026-09-03 10:16 +0800
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-03 12:29 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-03 17:50 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> - 2026-09-03 22:33 +0800
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-04 07:58 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-03 09:44 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-03 09:56 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-03 10:18 +1000
Re: the Ford model T lindsay <lindsay@nuneya.biz> - 2026-09-03 10:38 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2026-09-03 10:54 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-03 12:24 +1000
Re: the Ford model T lindsay <lindsay@nuneya.biz> - 2026-09-03 13:17 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-03 20:04 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-03 21:29 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-03 12:22 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-03 12:02 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-03 12:36 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> - 2026-09-03 10:07 +0800
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-03 12:37 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-03 20:09 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-03 21:50 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-03 20:12 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-03 21:53 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> - 2026-09-03 22:39 +0800
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-04 07:49 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-03 20:13 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-03 20:18 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-03 22:07 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-03 22:37 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-04 09:59 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-04 19:40 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-04 22:35 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-04 23:16 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-04 23:39 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-05 08:22 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-05 09:20 +1000
Re: the Ford model T lindsay <lindsay@nuneya.biz> - 2026-09-05 09:43 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-05 15:21 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-05 20:50 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-06 11:38 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-05 10:23 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-05 12:03 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-05 21:33 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-05 20:54 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-05 22:46 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-05 12:16 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-05 15:27 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-05 20:57 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-05 20:56 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-06 11:44 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-06 11:45 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-05 12:15 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-05 20:59 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-05 22:48 +1000
Re: the Ford model T lindsay <lindsay@nuneya.biz> - 2026-09-06 08:45 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-05 14:20 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-05 10:22 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-05 12:37 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-05 22:08 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-05 23:28 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-06 14:37 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-06 09:39 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-06 11:58 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-06 14:22 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-06 14:30 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-06 15:28 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-06 16:51 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-06 17:25 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-06 19:12 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-06 20:39 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-07 01:02 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-07 07:35 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-07 12:38 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-07 13:57 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-07 16:14 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-07 19:54 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-07 20:04 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-06 21:34 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-06 15:14 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-06 15:29 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-06 16:39 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-06 17:15 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-06 17:52 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-06 18:57 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-06 19:14 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-06 19:06 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-06 20:18 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-06 22:32 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-06 22:33 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-06 23:05 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-07 01:37 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-07 07:43 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-07 12:19 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-07 12:59 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-07 15:13 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-07 15:20 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-07 20:00 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-07 19:59 +1000
Re: the Ford model T lindsay <lindsay@nuneya.biz> - 2026-09-07 09:47 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-07 10:51 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-07 14:55 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-07 20:02 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-07 20:53 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-07 21:01 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-07 01:32 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-07 07:48 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-07 12:22 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-07 15:23 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-07 16:02 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-07 20:07 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-07 21:13 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-07 20:05 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-07 20:55 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-07 23:31 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-08 08:25 +1000
Re: the Ford model T lindsay <lindsay@nuneya.biz> - 2026-09-08 08:32 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-08 10:01 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2026-09-07 09:46 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-07 10:52 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-07 12:34 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-07 20:08 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-07 20:56 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-07 23:32 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-08 02:56 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-08 08:27 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-08 09:10 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-08 09:21 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-08 09:46 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-08 11:24 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-08 10:26 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-08 09:14 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-08 09:48 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-08 11:26 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-08 12:18 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-08 12:49 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-08 13:30 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-08 13:59 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-08 15:01 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-08 20:57 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-08 21:25 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-08 16:45 +1000
Re: the Ford model T lindsay <lindsay@nuneya.biz> - 2026-09-08 22:43 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-08 13:18 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-07 15:26 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-07 16:03 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-07 20:10 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-08 10:39 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2026-09-08 11:24 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-08 12:44 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-08 12:54 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2026-09-07 22:17 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-07 10:54 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2026-09-07 14:09 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-07 12:25 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-07 20:17 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-07 23:33 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-07 23:34 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-08 08:21 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-08 08:22 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2026-09-08 09:14 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-08 09:24 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-08 09:44 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-08 11:01 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-08 12:08 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-08 09:43 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-08 11:23 +1000
Re: the Ford model T lindsay <lindsay@nuneya.biz> - 2026-09-08 11:30 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-08 12:52 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-08 10:51 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-08 12:05 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-08 13:50 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-08 15:00 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-08 16:48 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-08 16:55 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-08 07:52 +0000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-08 21:03 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-08 21:37 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-08 21:58 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-09 00:46 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-09 20:01 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-09 21:53 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-09 22:44 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-10 12:48 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-10 15:28 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-09 23:09 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-10 08:36 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-10 10:49 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-10 13:01 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-10 15:43 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-10 17:49 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-10 13:47 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-10 16:54 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-10 18:14 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-10 18:33 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-10 20:37 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-10 21:05 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-11 13:45 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-11 18:53 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-11 20:30 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-11 21:38 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-11 22:09 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-11 23:32 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-11 23:30 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-12 00:16 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-12 08:22 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-12 09:55 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-12 12:23 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-12 12:28 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-12 14:07 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-12 14:31 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-12 17:40 +1000
Re: the Ford model T lindsay <noneofyour@biz.com.au> - 2026-09-12 12:02 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-12 09:46 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-12 12:24 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-10 20:34 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-11 16:26 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-11 21:36 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-10 21:01 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-10 20:32 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> - 2026-09-10 13:17 +0800
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-08 21:30 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-07 14:30 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-07 15:17 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-07 20:20 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-08 17:54 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-08 18:26 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-08 19:34 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-08 19:47 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-07 20:46 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-07 23:36 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-07 16:32 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-07 00:55 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-07 01:08 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-07 01:43 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-07 07:51 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-07 18:38 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-07 10:51 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-07 12:32 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-07 15:39 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-07 16:07 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-07 20:09 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-07 20:22 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-08 18:12 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-07 16:45 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-07 16:56 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-07 20:12 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-07 20:37 +1000
Re: the Ford model T lindsay <lindsay@nuneya.biz> - 2026-09-08 08:26 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-08 18:17 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-07 18:49 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-07 20:21 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-07 21:00 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2026-09-07 09:48 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-07 18:54 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-07 20:16 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-07 20:38 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-07 11:06 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-07 15:37 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-07 15:37 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-06 22:26 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-07 01:28 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-07 11:20 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-07 12:40 +1000
Re: the Ford model T lindsay <lindsay@nuneya.biz> - 2026-09-07 13:42 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-07 11:10 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-06 20:22 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-06 21:28 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-06 22:33 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-06 20:16 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-06 21:34 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-06 22:30 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-06 09:47 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-06 12:03 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-06 18:27 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-06 19:11 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-06 22:28 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-07 00:31 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-07 07:35 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-07 11:59 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-07 12:55 +1000
Re: the Ford model T lindsay <lindsay@nuneya.biz> - 2026-09-07 13:39 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-07 20:33 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-07 21:04 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-07 18:31 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-07 19:14 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-07 10:45 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-04 23:47 +1000
Re: the Ford model T lindsay <lindsay@nuneya.biz> - 2026-09-05 09:52 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-05 21:01 +1000
Re: the Ford model T lindsay <lindsay@nuneya.biz> - 2026-09-07 09:35 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-07 10:51 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-05 14:15 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-05 10:21 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-05 12:02 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-05 13:23 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-05 16:34 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-05 21:03 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-04 20:10 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-05 10:15 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-04 20:13 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-04 20:32 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-04 20:17 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-04 21:21 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-05 10:18 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-05 15:09 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-05 20:47 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-05 22:22 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-04 22:07 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-05 14:41 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-05 14:52 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-04 18:57 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-03 21:40 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-03 22:34 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-03 22:36 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-04 18:41 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-04 18:52 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-04 19:13 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-03 12:21 +1000
Re: the Ford model T lindsay <lindsay@nuneya.biz> - 2026-09-03 13:12 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-03 20:19 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-03 22:11 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-01 19:48 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-01 21:36 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-01 21:59 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-02 07:32 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-02 08:09 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-02 08:24 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-02 11:12 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-02 11:30 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-02 11:37 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-09-02 11:54 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-02 20:42 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-09-02 20:47 +1000
Re: the Ford model T lindsay <lindsay@nuneya.biz> - 2026-09-02 22:05 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-09-02 23:28 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-09-03 17:58 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-09-02 19:57 +1000
Re: the Ford model T jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> - 2026-09-02 14:13 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Noddy <me@home.com> - 2026-08-31 20:17 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-08-26 13:18 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-08-26 15:29 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-08-24 13:31 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2026-08-24 13:44 +1000
Re: the Ford model T alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2026-08-24 19:16 +1000
Re: the Ford model T Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-08-28 12:10 +1000
Page 22 of 44 — ← Prev page 1 … 20 21 [22] 23 24 … 44 Next page →
| From | Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-02 23:56 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <nfqo7lFmpqlU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #395724 |
On 2/9/2026 11:39 pm, Noddy wrote:
> On 2/09/2026 11:08 pm, Axel wrote:
>> Xeno wrote:
>
>>> As I have stated many a time before, when you apply for a job and
>>> claim qualifications, said qualifications will be verified before you
>>> ever get called in for interview.
>>
>> how would any job applicant know what checks a potential employer had
>> done anyway unless he told them
>
> Explain how they would, Felix?
>
> This is a really good poser for you, as without realising it you've put
> your mental mate on the spot. For *yonks* he's been refusing to support
> his claims that I'm not qualified by claiming that he can't cite
> checkable records as they're not available online and can only be
> sighted in hard copy. Yet *now* he, and by definition you, are claiming
> that employers can check qualifications without the applicant ever knowing.
>
> And here's the rub. If there's no online qualification database that
There is no *Public* Online Database because the database is private. It
can be accessed through registered training providers and records can be
verified by employers either through an industry body such as the VACC,
VetAssess, a Registered Training Organisation or directly through the
Victorian Registration and Qualifications Authority
https://www2.vrqa.vic.gov.au/
Remember, I queried the trade registration database through a former
colleague who worked at VetAssess, an organistation that *does* have
access to the relevant database. Not everything in the world is
accessible to Google you know!
> can't be checked by us here from the comfort of our swivel chairs as
> your mental mate claims, then how do employers check applicant
> qualifications?
See above. >
> Take all the time you need :)
I did, I went to PROV, no records for you there either.
--
Xeno
Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Axel <none@not.here> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-03 11:41 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <nfs1j7FstidU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #395724 |
Noddy wrote: > On 2/09/2026 11:08 pm, Axel wrote: >> Xeno wrote: > >>> As I have stated many a time before, when you apply for a job and >>> claim qualifications, said qualifications will be verified before >>> you ever get called in for interview. >> >> how would any job applicant know what checks a potential employer had >> done anyway unless he told them > > Explain how they would, Felix? > > This is a really good poser for you, as without realising it you've > put your mental mate on the spot. For *yonks* he's been refusing to > support his claims that I'm not qualified by claiming that he can't > cite checkable records as they're not available online and can only be > sighted in hard copy. Yet *now* he, and by definition you, are > claiming that employers can check qualifications without the applicant > ever knowing. > > And here's the rub. If there's no online qualification database that > can't be checked by us here from the comfort of our swivel chairs as > your mental mate claims, then how do employers check applicant > qualifications? simply by sighting supporting documentation, making phone calls, talking to persons cited as references, contacting former employers, contacting educational or training institutions, internet searches, and online data bases if available. > > Take all the time you need :) > > thanks, but I didn't need much -- Linux Mint 22.3
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-03 11:58 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <nfs2hnFt9tmU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #395748 |
On 3/09/2026 11:41 am, Axel wrote: > Noddy wrote: >> On 2/09/2026 11:08 pm, Axel wrote: >>> Xeno wrote: >> >>>> As I have stated many a time before, when you apply for a job and >>>> claim qualifications, said qualifications will be verified before >>>> you ever get called in for interview. >>> >>> how would any job applicant know what checks a potential employer had >>> done anyway unless he told them >> >> Explain how they would, Felix? >> >> This is a really good poser for you, as without realising it you've >> put your mental mate on the spot. For *yonks* he's been refusing to >> support his claims that I'm not qualified by claiming that he can't >> cite checkable records as they're not available online and can only be >> sighted in hard copy. Yet *now* he, and by definition you, are >> claiming that employers can check qualifications without the applicant >> ever knowing. >> >> And here's the rub. If there's no online qualification database that >> can't be checked by us here from the comfort of our swivel chairs as >> your mental mate claims, then how do employers check applicant >> qualifications? > > simply by sighting supporting documentation, making phone calls, talking > to persons cited as references, contacting former employers, contacting > educational or training institutions, internet searches, and online data > bases if available. These days, they'll just put your name into an "AI" if they bother at all. >> Take all the time you need :) >> >> > > thanks, but I didn't need much >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Noddy <me@home.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-03 12:13 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <117al58$3ansl$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #395748 |
On 3/09/2026 11:41 am, Axel wrote: > Noddy wrote: >> how would any job applicant know what checks a potential employer had >>> done anyway unless he told them >> >> Explain how they would, Felix? >> >> This is a really good poser for you, as without realising it you've >> put your mental mate on the spot. For *yonks* he's been refusing to >> support his claims that I'm not qualified by claiming that he can't >> cite checkable records as they're not available online and can only be >> sighted in hard copy. Yet *now* he, and by definition you, are >> claiming that employers can check qualifications without the applicant >> ever knowing. >> >> And here's the rub. If there's no online qualification database that >> can't be checked by us here from the comfort of our swivel chairs as >> your mental mate claims, then how do employers check applicant >> qualifications? > > simply by sighting supporting documentation, making phone calls, talking > to persons cited as references, contacting former employers, contacting > educational or training institutions, internet searches, and online data > bases if available. > >> >> Take all the time you need :) >> >> > > thanks, but I didn't need much Apparently it didn't take you long at all to completely avoid the question, so let me ask another way. If an applicant doesn't know that they've been "checked up on" in terms of their qualifications, then who is the potential employer calling if there is nowhere to call to confirm their credentials? Take your time with this. Have a crack :) -- -- -- Regards, Noddy.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-03 08:35 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <nfrmknFrirpU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #395699 |
On 2/09/2026 11:08 pm, Axel wrote: > how would any job applicant know what checks a potential employer had > done anyway unless he told them The applicant would have had to give the potential employer enough information to enable him to do the checks.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-03 09:48 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <nfrqthFs57qU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #395732 |
On 3/9/2026 8:35 am, Keithr0 wrote:
> On 2/09/2026 11:08 pm, Axel wrote:
>
>> how would any job applicant know what checks a potential employer had
>> done anyway unless he told them
> The applicant would have had to give the potential employer enough
> information to enable him to do the checks.
Correct. Usually it is trade qualification, full name, DOB and a signed
job application form. Might need a date of apprenticeship completion as
well.
--
Xeno
Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-03 09:52 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <nfrr6hFs7h2U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #395740 |
On 3/09/2026 9:48 am, Xeno wrote: > > > On 3/9/2026 8:35 am, Keithr0 wrote: >> On 2/09/2026 11:08 pm, Axel wrote: >> >>> how would any job applicant know what checks a potential employer had >>> done anyway unless he told them >> The applicant would have had to give the potential employer enough >> information to enable him to do the checks. > > Correct. Usually it is trade qualification, full name, DOB and a signed > job application form. Might need a date of apprenticeship completion as > well. > One thing that I have never done is fill out a job application form.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-03 12:28 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <nfs4a5Ftj2vU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #395741 |
On 3/9/2026 9:52 am, Keithr0 wrote:
> On 3/09/2026 9:48 am, Xeno wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 3/9/2026 8:35 am, Keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 2/09/2026 11:08 pm, Axel wrote:
>>>
>>>> how would any job applicant know what checks a potential employer
>>>> had done anyway unless he told them
>>> The applicant would have had to give the potential employer enough
>>> information to enable him to do the checks.
>>
>> Correct. Usually it is trade qualification, full name, DOB and a
>> signed job application form. Might need a date of apprenticeship
>> completion as well.
>>
> One thing that I have never done is fill out a job application form.
I doubt that.
--
Xeno
Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-03 20:16 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <117bhdt$3iuu3$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #395732 |
On 03-Sep-26 3:32 PM, Keithr0 wrote: > On 3/09/2026 3:17 pm, Axel wrote: >> Keithr0 wrote: >>> On 3/09/2026 12:45 pm, Axel wrote: >>>> Keithr0 wrote: >>>>> On 2/09/2026 11:08 pm, Axel wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> how would any job applicant know what checks a potential employer >>>>>> had done anyway unless he told them >>>>> The applicant would have had to give the potential employer enough >>>>> information to enable him to do the checks. >>>> >>>> but the applicant wouldn't know if the employer had verified it or not >>>> >>> Would the applicant care as long as (s)he got the job? >> >> they might care if they had false bona fides >> > Then they don't get the job full stop. Try it on the next possible > employer, I've known a number of people who got jobs on completely false > information. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Called Fake it 'till ya make it. Ol' felix would forget his story and get the bums rush within a week. 😁🤣🤣 -- Usenet is like a herd of performing elephants with diarrhea--Massive, difficult to redirect, awe inspiring, entertaining and a source of mind boggling amounts of excrement when you least expect it!!!!. Gene Spafford
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-02 21:08 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <nfqedqFl8mcU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #395663 |
On 2/09/2026 8:37 pm, Noddy wrote: > On 2/09/2026 8:09 pm, Keithr0 wrote: >> On 2/09/2026 7:23 pm, Xeno wrote: > >> >> I have deeds of indenture all written in Victorian english, no >> employer has ever asked to see them. They have never asked to see my >> certificates either which is just as well since the incompetents of >> the Australian Immigration Department managed to lose them. >> >> I have simply relied on competence to get jobs. > > I've never met a single person who has ever needed to present their > qualifications when applying for a job, or asked to see qualifications > when hiring someone. I was never interested in what people claimed to be > qualified at, but what they claimed to be *experienced* at. > > The two are not the same thing. > In most interviews I've had, technical questions were asked, a far better method of determining whether somebody is competent than a certificate obtained years ago. Questions were also asked about previous experience, in a couple of interviews for tracking station jobs there as a small exam, I think that it was a NASA requirement. Several jobs also required a security clearance check.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-02 21:54 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <nfqh4eFllqvU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #395675 |
On 2/9/2026 9:08 pm, Keithr0 wrote:
> On 2/09/2026 8:37 pm, Noddy wrote:
>> On 2/09/2026 8:09 pm, Keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 2/09/2026 7:23 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I have deeds of indenture all written in Victorian english, no
>>> employer has ever asked to see them. They have never asked to see my
>>> certificates either which is just as well since the incompetents of
>>> the Australian Immigration Department managed to lose them.
>>>
>>> I have simply relied on competence to get jobs.
>>
>> I've never met a single person who has ever needed to present their
>> qualifications when applying for a job, or asked to see qualifications
>> when hiring someone. I was never interested in what people claimed to
>> be qualified at, but what they claimed to be *experienced* at.
>>
>> The two are not the same thing.
>>
> In most interviews I've had, technical questions were asked, a far
In most employment applications, the *qualifications* are the start
point. That determines where matters go from there and *if* they go
anywhere at all. Any qualifications claims made are verified *prior* to
interview, not after.
> better method of determining whether somebody is competent than a
Yes, been asked the technical questions, been asked about relevant
experience, been asked about followup training and post trade
certification.
> certificate obtained years ago. Questions were also asked about previous
When I made my career move, my most recent update certification, a
diesel fitting certificate, was a mere 7 years from issue. Many
subsequent update certificates were updated as many as 3 or 4 times in
the following 2 decades due to technology advances.
Your point is?
> experience, in a couple of interviews for tracking station jobs there as
> a small exam, I think that it was a NASA requirement. Several jobs also
> required a security clearance check.
Boasting again...
--
Xeno
Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-02 22:24 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <nfqiruFlvbaU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #395678 |
On 2/09/2026 9:54 pm, Xeno wrote: > > > On 2/9/2026 9:08 pm, Keithr0 wrote: >> On 2/09/2026 8:37 pm, Noddy wrote: >>> On 2/09/2026 8:09 pm, Keithr0 wrote: >>>> On 2/09/2026 7:23 pm, Xeno wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> I have deeds of indenture all written in Victorian english, no >>>> employer has ever asked to see them. They have never asked to see my >>>> certificates either which is just as well since the incompetents of >>>> the Australian Immigration Department managed to lose them. >>>> >>>> I have simply relied on competence to get jobs. >>> >>> I've never met a single person who has ever needed to present their >>> qualifications when applying for a job, or asked to see >>> qualifications when hiring someone. I was never interested in what >>> people claimed to be qualified at, but what they claimed to be >>> *experienced* at. >>> >>> The two are not the same thing. >>> >> In most interviews I've had, technical questions were asked, a far > > In most employment applications, the *qualifications* are the start > point. That determines where matters go from there and *if* they go > anywhere at all. Any qualifications claims made are verified *prior* to > interview, not after. Not in my world, which was considerably more technical than yours. >> better method of determining whether somebody is competent than a > > Yes, been asked the technical questions, been asked about relevant > experience, been asked about followup training and post trade > certification. I have taken any qualification since the end of my apprenticeship. I have taken courses either for my own interest, or provided by my employers. None of these resulted in formal qualifications. >> certificate obtained years ago. Questions were also asked about previous > > When I made my career move, my most recent update certification, a > diesel fitting certificate, was a mere 7 years from issue. Many > subsequent update certificates were updated as many as 3 or 4 times in > the following 2 decades due to technology advances. > > Your point is? > >> experience, in a couple of interviews for tracking station jobs there >> as a small exam, I think that it was a NASA requirement. Several jobs >> also required a security clearance check. > > Boasting again... Nope, just stating facts, I even had to have a security clearance to do my apprenticeship. I believe that somebody (probably wearing a cloak and carrying a dagger) visited my school, although what they expected to find about a 16 year old I have no idea. As apprentices we had to show our security pass to the guard at the gate to get to work. Several jobs that I have had were military projects, obviously there were security implications there. As I've said before, worked in a different world to yours, one which you have no knowledge of, and obviously no understanding of.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-02 23:07 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <nfqld9Fm96kU5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #395687 |
On 2/9/2026 10:24 pm, Keithr0 wrote:
> On 2/09/2026 9:54 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2/9/2026 9:08 pm, Keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 2/09/2026 8:37 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>> On 2/09/2026 8:09 pm, Keithr0 wrote:
>>>>> On 2/09/2026 7:23 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I have deeds of indenture all written in Victorian english, no
>>>>> employer has ever asked to see them. They have never asked to see
>>>>> my certificates either which is just as well since the incompetents
>>>>> of the Australian Immigration Department managed to lose them.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have simply relied on competence to get jobs.
>>>>
>>>> I've never met a single person who has ever needed to present their
>>>> qualifications when applying for a job, or asked to see
>>>> qualifications when hiring someone. I was never interested in what
>>>> people claimed to be qualified at, but what they claimed to be
>>>> *experienced* at.
>>>>
>>>> The two are not the same thing.
>>>>
>>> In most interviews I've had, technical questions were asked, a far
>>
>> In most employment applications, the *qualifications* are the start
>> point. That determines where matters go from there and *if* they go
>> anywhere at all. Any qualifications claims made are verified *prior*
>> to interview, not after.
>
> Not in my world, which was considerably more technical than yours.
Ah, more boasting. Your world was controlled by *head hunters*. They
kept track of who was who in the industry.>
>>> better method of determining whether somebody is competent than a
>>
>> Yes, been asked the technical questions, been asked about relevant
>> experience, been asked about followup training and post trade
>> certification.
>
> I have taken any qualification since the end of my apprenticeship. I
> have taken courses either for my own interest, or provided by my
> employers. None of these resulted in formal qualifications.
>>> certificate obtained years ago. Questions were also asked about previous
>>
>> When I made my career move, my most recent update certification, a
>> diesel fitting certificate, was a mere 7 years from issue. Many
>> subsequent update certificates were updated as many as 3 or 4 times in
>> the following 2 decades due to technology advances.
>>
>> Your point is?
>>
>>> experience, in a couple of interviews for tracking station jobs there
>>> as a small exam, I think that it was a NASA requirement. Several jobs
>>> also required a security clearance check.
>>
>> Boasting again...
> Nope, just stating facts, I even had to have a security clearance to do
> my apprenticeship. I believe that somebody (probably wearing a cloak and
> carrying a dagger) visited my school, although what they expected to
> find about a 16 year old I have no idea. As apprentices we had to show
> our security pass to the guard at the gate to get to work.
>
> Several jobs that I have had were military projects, obviously there
> were security implications there.
>
> As I've said before, worked in a different world to yours, one which you
> have no knowledge of, and obviously no understanding of.
--
Xeno
Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-03 08:55 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <nfrnr3Fro7jU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #395698 |
On 2/09/2026 11:07 pm, Xeno wrote: > > > On 2/9/2026 10:24 pm, Keithr0 wrote: >> On 2/09/2026 9:54 pm, Xeno wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 2/9/2026 9:08 pm, Keithr0 wrote: >>>> On 2/09/2026 8:37 pm, Noddy wrote: >>>>> On 2/09/2026 8:09 pm, Keithr0 wrote: >>>>>> On 2/09/2026 7:23 pm, Xeno wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I have deeds of indenture all written in Victorian english, no >>>>>> employer has ever asked to see them. They have never asked to see >>>>>> my certificates either which is just as well since the >>>>>> incompetents of the Australian Immigration Department managed to >>>>>> lose them. >>>>>> >>>>>> I have simply relied on competence to get jobs. >>>>> >>>>> I've never met a single person who has ever needed to present their >>>>> qualifications when applying for a job, or asked to see >>>>> qualifications when hiring someone. I was never interested in what >>>>> people claimed to be qualified at, but what they claimed to be >>>>> *experienced* at. >>>>> >>>>> The two are not the same thing. >>>>> >>>> In most interviews I've had, technical questions were asked, a far >>> >>> In most employment applications, the *qualifications* are the start >>> point. That determines where matters go from there and *if* they go >>> anywhere at all. Any qualifications claims made are verified *prior* >>> to interview, not after. >> >> Not in my world, which was considerably more technical than yours. > > Ah, more boasting. Not boasting just pointing out the facts. > Your world was controlled by *head hunters*. They kept track of who > was who in the industry.> Bullshit! Anyway would you know? It is an environment with which you have zero experience. I have never got a job through headhunters, and I don't remember anybody with whom I worked saying that is how they got the job. >>>> better method of determining whether somebody is competent than a >>> >>> Yes, been asked the technical questions, been asked about relevant >>> experience, been asked about followup training and post trade >>> certification. >> >> I have not taken any qualification since the end of my apprenticeship. I >> have taken courses either for my own interest, or provided by my >> employers. None of these resulted in formal qualifications. >>>> certificate obtained years ago. Questions were also asked about >>>> previous >>> >>> When I made my career move, my most recent update certification, a >>> diesel fitting certificate, was a mere 7 years from issue. Many >>> subsequent update certificates were updated as many as 3 or 4 times >>> in the following 2 decades due to technology advances. >>> >>> Your point is? The point is that none of these were formal qualifications, some were courses that I did out of interest, others were courses run by my employer of the time about the specifics of their product. A few (very few) of these affected your standing within the company, the vast majority were simply informative usually about updates to the product, no assessment was made.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-03 12:31 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <nfs4gqFtkckU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #395733 |
On 3/9/2026 8:55 am, Keithr0 wrote:
> On 2/09/2026 11:07 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2/9/2026 10:24 pm, Keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 2/09/2026 9:54 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2/9/2026 9:08 pm, Keithr0 wrote:
>>>>> On 2/09/2026 8:37 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>>>> On 2/09/2026 8:09 pm, Keithr0 wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2/09/2026 7:23 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have deeds of indenture all written in Victorian english, no
>>>>>>> employer has ever asked to see them. They have never asked to see
>>>>>>> my certificates either which is just as well since the
>>>>>>> incompetents of the Australian Immigration Department managed to
>>>>>>> lose them.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have simply relied on competence to get jobs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've never met a single person who has ever needed to present
>>>>>> their qualifications when applying for a job, or asked to see
>>>>>> qualifications when hiring someone. I was never interested in what
>>>>>> people claimed to be qualified at, but what they claimed to be
>>>>>> *experienced* at.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The two are not the same thing.
>>>>>>
>>>>> In most interviews I've had, technical questions were asked, a far
>>>>
>>>> In most employment applications, the *qualifications* are the start
>>>> point. That determines where matters go from there and *if* they go
>>>> anywhere at all. Any qualifications claims made are verified *prior*
>>>> to interview, not after.
>>>
>>> Not in my world, which was considerably more technical than yours.
>>
>> Ah, more boasting.
>
> Not boasting just pointing out the facts.
>
>> Your world was controlled by *head hunters*. They kept track of who
>> was who in the industry.>
>
> Bullshit! Anyway would you know? It is an environment with which you
> have zero experience. I have never got a job through headhunters, and I
> don't remember anybody with whom I worked saying that is how they got
> the job.
Most trades and above use headhunters these days and this was the case
when first I began mining. My role in Indonesia, for instance, was first
advertised Australia wide by a mob called Chandler Mcleod;
https://www.chandlermacleod.com/
It was also my first, but not my last, experience with psychometric
testing. From that time on I was registered with headhunters.
>
>>>>> better method of determining whether somebody is competent than a
>>>>
>>>> Yes, been asked the technical questions, been asked about relevant
>>>> experience, been asked about followup training and post trade
>>>> certification.
>>>
>>> I have not taken any qualification since the end of my
>>> apprenticeship. I have taken courses either for my own interest, or
>>> provided by my employers. None of these resulted in formal
>>> qualifications.
>>>>> certificate obtained years ago. Questions were also asked about
>>>>> previous
>>>>
>>>> When I made my career move, my most recent update certification, a
>>>> diesel fitting certificate, was a mere 7 years from issue. Many
>>>> subsequent update certificates were updated as many as 3 or 4 times
>>>> in the following 2 decades due to technology advances.
>>>>
>>>> Your point is?
>
> The point is that none of these were formal qualifications, some were
> courses that I did out of interest, others were courses run by my
> employer of the time about the specifics of their product. A few (very
> few) of these affected your standing within the company, the vast
> majority were simply informative usually about updates to the product,
> no assessment was made.
In my case, a number of courses were skills update courses - like my
courses in engine tuning, fuel injection, automotive electronics and
truck braking systems. A number of courses were licence requirements -
like AC and LPG. There are more I would need to do to remain current
now, like EV licencing. My diesel fitting course at Hobart Tech gave me
a complete new trade which I then took up with gusto in the mining
industry and it's that industry where I gained much of my earthmoving
equipment experience.
--
Xeno
Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jonz <Nothere@oroverthere.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-03 20:25 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <117bhvk$3iuu3$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #395687 |
On 02-Sep-26 10:24 PM, Keithr0 wrote:
> On 2/09/2026 9:54 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2/9/2026 9:08 pm, Keithr0 wrote:
>>> On 2/09/2026 8:37 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>>> On 2/09/2026 8:09 pm, Keithr0 wrote:
>>>>> On 2/09/2026 7:23 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I have deeds of indenture all written in Victorian english, no
>>>>> employer has ever asked to see them. They have never asked to see
>>>>> my certificates either which is just as well since the incompetents
>>>>> of the Australian Immigration Department managed to lose them.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have simply relied on competence to get jobs.
>>>>
>>>> I've never met a single person who has ever needed to present their
>>>> qualifications when applying for a job, or asked to see
>>>> qualifications when hiring someone. I was never interested in what
>>>> people claimed to be qualified at, but what they claimed to be
>>>> *experienced* at.
>>>>
>>>> The two are not the same thing.
>>>>
>>> In most interviews I've had, technical questions were asked, a far
>>
>> In most employment applications, the *qualifications* are the start
>> point. That determines where matters go from there and *if* they go
>> anywhere at all. Any qualifications claims made are verified *prior*
>> to interview, not after.
>
> Not in my world, which was considerably more technical than yours.
>
>>> better method of determining whether somebody is competent than a
>>
>> Yes, been asked the technical questions, been asked about relevant
>> experience, been asked about followup training and post trade
>> certification.
>
> I have taken any qualification since the end of my apprenticeship. I
> have taken courses either for my own interest, or provided by my
> employers. None of these resulted in formal qualifications.
>>> certificate obtained years ago. Questions were also asked about previous
>>
>> When I made my career move, my most recent update certification, a
>> diesel fitting certificate, was a mere 7 years from issue. Many
>> subsequent update certificates were updated as many as 3 or 4 times in
>> the following 2 decades due to technology advances.
>>
>> Your point is?
>>
>>> experience, in a couple of interviews for tracking station jobs there
>>> as a small exam, I think that it was a NASA requirement. Several jobs
>>> also required a security clearance check.
>>
>> Boasting again...
> Nope, just stating facts, I even had to have a security clearance to do
> my apprenticeship. I believe that somebody (probably wearing a cloak and
> carrying a dagger) visited my school, although what they expected to
> find about a 16 year old I have no idea. As apprentices we had to show
> our security pass to the guard at the gate to get to work.
>
> Several jobs that I have had were military projects, obviously there
> were security implications there.
>
> As I've said before, worked in a different world to yours, one which you
> have no knowledge of, and obviously no understanding of.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
That dosn`t bother arrogant/bullshitting arse wipes such as him..
He`s got no idea when to stop! I`m surprised he has got to the age
he is!.
>
--
Usenet is like a herd of performing elephants with diarrhea--Massive,
difficult to redirect, awe inspiring, entertaining and a source of mind
boggling amounts of excrement when you least expect it!!!!. Gene Spafford
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Noddy <me@home.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-02 23:21 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <11797su$2qkqg$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #395675 |
On 2/09/2026 9:08 pm, Keithr0 wrote: > On 2/09/2026 8:37 pm, Noddy wrote: >> On 2/09/2026 8:09 pm, Keithr0 wrote: >>> On 2/09/2026 7:23 pm, Xeno wrote: >> >>> >>> I have deeds of indenture all written in Victorian english, no >>> employer has ever asked to see them. They have never asked to see my >>> certificates either which is just as well since the incompetents of >>> the Australian Immigration Department managed to lose them. >>> >>> I have simply relied on competence to get jobs. >> >> I've never met a single person who has ever needed to present their >> qualifications when applying for a job, or asked to see qualifications >> when hiring someone. I was never interested in what people claimed to >> be qualified at, but what they claimed to be *experienced* at. >> >> The two are not the same thing. >> > In most interviews I've had, technical questions were asked, a far > better method of determining whether somebody is competent than a > certificate obtained years ago. Questions were also asked about previous > experience, in a couple of interviews for tracking station jobs there as > a small exam, I think that it was a NASA requirement. Several jobs also > required a security clearance check. Same here, in a different context. When I've applied for a job, the only questions I was ever asked is where I worked previously and what I did. Similarly, when hiring people they were exactly the same questions I asked of others. I wasn't interested in qualifications. As we've seen first hand here, some qualified people can be remarkably clueless. -- -- -- Regards, Noddy.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-02 23:26 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <nfqmfnFmhhjU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #395709 |
On 2/9/2026 11:21 pm, Noddy wrote:
> On 2/09/2026 9:08 pm, Keithr0 wrote:
>> On 2/09/2026 8:37 pm, Noddy wrote:
>>> On 2/09/2026 8:09 pm, Keithr0 wrote:
>>>> On 2/09/2026 7:23 pm, Xeno wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I have deeds of indenture all written in Victorian english, no
>>>> employer has ever asked to see them. They have never asked to see my
>>>> certificates either which is just as well since the incompetents of
>>>> the Australian Immigration Department managed to lose them.
>>>>
>>>> I have simply relied on competence to get jobs.
>>>
>>> I've never met a single person who has ever needed to present their
>>> qualifications when applying for a job, or asked to see
>>> qualifications when hiring someone. I was never interested in what
>>> people claimed to be qualified at, but what they claimed to be
>>> *experienced* at.
>>>
>>> The two are not the same thing.
>>>
>> In most interviews I've had, technical questions were asked, a far
>> better method of determining whether somebody is competent than a
>> certificate obtained years ago. Questions were also asked about
>> previous experience, in a couple of interviews for tracking station
>> jobs there as a small exam, I think that it was a NASA requirement.
>> Several jobs also required a security clearance check.
>
> Same here, in a different context. When I've applied for a job, the only
> questions I was ever asked is where I worked previously and what I did.
Yeah but you were applying for trades assistant or cleaning jobs so no
qualification to request.
> Similarly, when hiring people they were exactly the same questions I
> asked of others.
>
> I wasn't interested in qualifications. As we've seen first hand here,
> some qualified people can be remarkably clueless.
>
Coming from someone as unqualified as you, that is priceless!
--
Xeno
Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | alvey <Factman@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-03 17:21 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <117b757$3fqf7$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #395709 |
Noddy wrote: > > Same here, in a different context. When I've applied for a job, the only > questions I was ever asked is where I worked previously and what I did. There is no proof that you have ever had a job. > Similarly, when hiring people they were exactly the same questions I > asked of others. There is no proof that you have ever been in a position to interview. (And the thought of you doing so is positively oozing with comic potential. You'd'd be a combination of Basil Fawlty & David Brent) -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-02 22:18 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <nfqih8FlsorU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #395663 |
On 2/9/2026 8:37 pm, Noddy wrote: > On 2/09/2026 8:09 pm, Keithr0 wrote: >> On 2/09/2026 7:23 pm, Xeno wrote: > >> >> I have deeds of indenture all written in Victorian english, no >> employer has ever asked to see them. They have never asked to see my >> certificates either which is just as well since the incompetents of >> the Australian Immigration Department managed to lose them. >> >> I have simply relied on competence to get jobs. > > I've never met a single person who has ever needed to present their > qualifications when applying for a job, or asked to see qualifications > when hiring someone. I was never interested in what people claimed to be > qualified at, but what they claimed to be *experienced* at. > > The two are not the same thing. > Spot on. I can't remember being asked to prove that I was qualified, its possible that when I applied to work at Ford they did ask but that was in 1977 almost 50yrs ago so my memory of the details has faded some what. -- Daryl
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 22 of 44 — ← Prev page 1 … 20 21 [22] 23 24 … 44 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | aus.cars
csiph-web