Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > aus.cars > #371996 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2024-12-21 11:50 +1100 |
| Last post | 2024-12-24 20:17 +1100 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 217 — 16 participants |
Back to article view | Back to aus.cars
The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-21 11:50 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2024-12-21 14:15 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Noddy <me@home.com> - 2024-12-21 17:43 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-21 17:59 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-21 18:48 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2024-12-21 19:33 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-21 20:46 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2024-12-22 08:09 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Noddy <me@home.com> - 2024-12-22 09:41 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-22 00:08 +0000
Re: The real cost of net zero Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2024-12-22 11:39 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Noddy <me@home.com> - 2024-12-22 12:09 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-22 12:45 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2024-12-22 13:51 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Noddy <me@home.com> - 2024-12-22 16:13 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2024-12-22 16:22 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Noddy <me@home.com> - 2024-12-22 17:15 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-22 16:42 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> - 2024-12-23 07:34 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-23 13:02 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-22 12:35 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2024-12-22 13:29 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-22 13:41 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2024-12-22 15:27 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Noddy <me@home.com> - 2024-12-22 16:11 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2024-12-22 16:13 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Noddy <me@home.com> - 2024-12-22 17:13 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2024-12-22 18:04 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Noddy <me@home.com> - 2024-12-22 20:42 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2024-12-22 20:49 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Noddy <me@home.com> - 2024-12-22 22:12 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-23 12:08 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Lindsay <lindsay00@nunnya.biz> - 2024-12-27 10:41 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Noddy <me@home.com> - 2024-12-27 12:12 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero MightyMouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-27 16:17 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-27 16:29 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Lindsay <lindsay00@nunnya.biz> - 2024-12-27 19:35 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2024-12-22 19:44 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Noddy <me@home.com> - 2024-12-22 20:43 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Noddy <me@home.com> - 2024-12-22 17:14 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2024-12-22 17:59 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2024-12-22 18:31 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-22 18:33 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-23 11:43 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-23 11:38 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-23 13:13 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2024-12-23 13:40 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Noddy <me@home.com> - 2024-12-23 14:08 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-23 15:25 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Noddy <me@home.com> - 2024-12-23 14:08 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-23 15:26 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-23 15:40 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2024-12-23 16:30 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-23 17:14 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2024-12-23 19:24 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-23 20:25 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Noddy <me@home.com> - 2024-12-23 17:28 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-23 17:34 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2024-12-23 18:05 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-23 20:13 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2024-12-23 19:25 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-23 20:18 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Noddy <me@home.com> - 2024-12-23 21:53 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-23 22:22 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero sammy <Factman@gmail.com> - 2024-12-23 22:07 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-12-23 21:00 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-24 05:35 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-24 22:58 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-24 23:13 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-25 07:31 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2024-12-25 08:28 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> - 2024-12-23 07:23 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-23 11:22 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> - 2024-12-23 11:21 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-23 13:57 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-23 15:16 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2024-12-23 18:07 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-24 15:53 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-24 18:41 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-24 19:48 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-24 20:07 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> - 2024-12-25 07:00 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-25 10:38 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-12-25 21:52 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 04:51 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-12-26 19:40 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 20:17 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 05:47 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-26 13:18 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 14:35 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero MightyMouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-26 16:06 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 15:14 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-12-26 19:48 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> - 2024-12-28 07:07 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-24 15:51 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-24 18:40 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-24 19:52 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2024-12-24 19:42 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-24 21:29 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-12-24 20:57 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-24 21:38 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-12-25 08:08 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-25 09:37 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 12:41 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-26 13:34 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> - 2024-12-23 07:16 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-23 11:17 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> - 2024-12-23 11:32 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-23 13:59 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-23 15:17 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-24 15:46 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-24 18:29 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2024-12-23 18:23 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-24 15:48 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> - 2024-12-24 15:40 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-24 20:00 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2024-12-24 19:11 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-24 20:16 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-12-24 21:07 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-24 21:40 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-25 07:16 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-12-25 22:02 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 04:52 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-12-26 19:55 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 20:19 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-26 21:11 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-27 04:39 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 05:51 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-26 11:42 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-26 13:22 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-26 13:39 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2024-12-24 20:34 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-24 21:46 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Noddy <me@home.com> - 2024-12-24 21:55 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-24 23:09 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Lindsay <lindsay00@nunnya.biz> - 2024-12-24 23:51 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> - 2024-12-25 07:20 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-25 10:51 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2024-12-25 18:50 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2024-12-26 16:29 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-26 18:25 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 18:00 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero MightyMouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-26 19:08 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-26 21:05 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 20:26 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-26 23:24 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Noddy <me@home.com> - 2024-12-26 19:44 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-26 21:08 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 20:40 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-26 22:08 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-26 23:26 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-26 23:46 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-12-27 19:53 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-26 18:33 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-25 07:24 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2024-12-25 08:20 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-25 10:43 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-23 13:03 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-23 14:00 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2024-12-23 14:58 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-23 15:26 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-23 15:44 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2024-12-23 16:32 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-23 17:19 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2024-12-24 12:29 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-24 13:10 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> - 2024-12-24 15:32 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-24 18:42 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-24 15:37 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-12-24 21:24 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-12-24 21:34 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-25 07:21 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-24 21:43 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-12-25 00:09 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-25 07:27 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2024-12-25 08:24 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-25 09:15 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-25 10:53 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-25 07:18 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-12-25 22:25 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 04:53 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-12-26 20:52 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-27 04:44 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Noddy <me@home.com> - 2024-12-23 17:28 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-23 17:33 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> - 2024-12-23 18:52 +0800
Re: The real cost of net zero SAG <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> - 2024-12-24 05:23 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-24 15:35 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-24 18:26 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-24 20:05 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2024-12-24 18:37 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-24 20:06 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> - 2024-12-25 07:41 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-12-25 09:27 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 06:03 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-26 13:25 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 14:16 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 15:18 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-26 16:31 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 17:40 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero MightyMouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-26 18:58 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> - 2024-12-24 16:37 +0800
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-24 20:07 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero alvey <Factman@gmail.com> - 2024-12-23 18:32 +1000
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-24 15:34 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-24 18:26 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> - 2024-12-24 17:08 +0800
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-24 20:19 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> - 2024-12-24 17:03 +0800
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-24 22:56 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-24 23:12 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-23 15:20 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2024-12-23 15:35 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> - 2024-12-24 15:41 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-24 18:28 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2024-12-24 20:02 +1100
Re: The real cost of net zero Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2024-12-24 20:17 +1100
Page 10 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 Next page →
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-26 04:53 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <op.2zcjzoyqbyq249@pvr2.lan> |
| In reply to | #372267 |
On Wed, 25 Dec 2024 22:25:57 +1100, Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > Rod Speed wrote on 25/12/24 7:18 am: >> On Tue, 24 Dec 2024 21:24:20 +1100, Daniel70 >> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >> >>> Rod Speed wrote on 23/12/24 5:19 pm: >>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 16:32:47 +1100, Trevor Wilson >>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >>>>> On 23/12/2024 3:44 pm, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:58:40 +1100, Trevor Wilson >>>>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 2:00 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>> Xeno wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 11:17 am, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>> alvey wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Get the facts. radio interview I recorded with Chris Uhlmann, >>>>>>>>>>>> award winning journalist and Sky News Political Contributor >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://auslink.info/audio/netzero.mp4 (20Kb) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> or watch the documentary .. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbxpieEQ7bc >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Why would anyone interested in this subject bother with a >>>>>>>>>>> piece by a political journalist & produced by Murdoch? Try >>>>>>>>>>> finding something by qualified experts in the subject. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> so everything that was said is wrong or a lie, is that it? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Depends on what is omitted as much as what is said. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> anyhow, Dutton will solve the problem when he becomes PM by >>>>>>>> building nuclear power plants >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Bullshit. Dutton will build exactly ZERO nukes. He will FINALLY >>>>>>> crunch the numbers and admit that they are way too expensive. >>>> >>>>>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. >>>> >>>>> Nope. Fact. >>>> Can't be a fact until it happens and it won't happen, you watch >>>> >>>>> Dutton will find out just how much nukes cost and will then announce >>>>> that he will not build them. >>>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. >>>> >>>>> He will build gas and coal fired power stations instead, because >>>>> they are way cheaper, >>>> And aren't viable for anything like as long. >>>> >>>>> Gina wants him to and he doesn't give a crap about CO2 emissions. >>>> Because even if we shut down everything which produces any CO2 >>>> including that produced in the manufacture of renewables and the >>>> concrete used in the stupid wind towers, it would have no measurabe >>>> effect what so ever of world climate or even world CO2 levels because >>>> we produce fuck all of that compare with what the rest of the world >>>> does and will continue to do forever. >> >>> You are correct ... to an extent, Roddles. >> Completely correct in fact. >> >>> Last I heard/read Australia was producing about 1.25% of the total CO2 >>> even though our population is only approx 0.43% of the worlds >>> population. Maybe that 1.25% figure includes the CO2 we produce in >>> mining stuff which we then sell to others. >> >>> In any case, if the rest of the Worlds population don't (also) take >>> measures to reduce the increasing atmospheric CO2, WE (AUSTRALIA) WILL >>> SUFFER, TOO!! >> No evidence of any suffering > Roddles, do you understand the meaning of the word "WILL"?? ... as in > "WE (AUSTRALIA) WILL SUFFER, TOO!!"?? We should have seen some suffering already if it was going to happen, fuckwit
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-26 20:52 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <vkj90s$2tus9$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #372271 |
Rod Speed wrote on 26/12/24 4:53 am: > On Wed, 25 Dec 2024 22:25:57 +1100, Daniel70 > <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >> Rod Speed wrote on 25/12/24 7:18 am: >>> On Tue, 24 Dec 2024 21:24:20 +1100, Daniel70 >>> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >>>> Rod Speed wrote on 23/12/24 5:19 pm: >>>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 16:32:47 +1100, Trevor Wilson >>>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >>>>>> On 23/12/2024 3:44 pm, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:58:40 +1100, Trevor Wilson >>>>>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: <Snip> >>>>>>>> Bullshit. Dutton will build exactly ZERO nukes. He will FINALLY >>>>>>>> crunch the numbers and admit that they are way too expensive. >>>>> >>>>>>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. >>>>> >>>>>> Nope. Fact. >>>>> Can't be a fact until it happens and it won't happen, you watch >>>>> >>>>>> Dutton will find out just how much nukes cost and will then >>>>>> announce that he will not build them. >>>>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. >>>>> >>>>>> He will build gas and coal fired power stations instead, because >>>>>> they are way cheaper, >>>>> And aren't viable for anything like as long. >>>>> >>>>>> Gina wants him to and he doesn't give a crap about CO2 emissions. >>>>> Because even if we shut down everything which produces any CO2 >>>>> including that produced in the manufacture of renewables and the >>>>> concrete used in the stupid wind towers, it would have no measurabe >>>>> effect what so ever of world climate or even world CO2 levels because >>>>> we produce fuck all of that compare with what the rest of the world >>>>> does and will continue to do forever. >>> >>>> You are correct ... to an extent, Roddles. >>> Completely correct in fact. >>> >>>> Last I heard/read Australia was producing about 1.25% of the total >>>> CO2 even though our population is only approx 0.43% of the worlds >>>> population. Maybe that 1.25% figure includes the CO2 we produce in >>>> mining stuff which we then sell to others. >>> >>>> In any case, if the rest of the Worlds population don't (also) take >>>> measures to reduce the increasing atmospheric CO2, WE (AUSTRALIA) >>>> WILL SUFFER, TOO!! > >>> No evidence of any suffering > >> Roddles, do you understand the meaning of the word "WILL"?? ... as in >> "WE (AUSTRALIA) WILL SUFFER, TOO!!"?? > > We should have seen some suffering already if it was going to happen, > fuckwit Oh!! And the Climatic conditions 'we' experience NOW are exactly the same as those experienced 50, 100, 250 years ago, are they, Roddles?? I think NOT!! -- Daniel
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-27 04:44 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <op.2zed7neybyq249@pvr2.lan> |
| In reply to | #372301 |
On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 20:52:35 +1100, Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: > Rod Speed wrote on 26/12/24 4:53 am: >> On Wed, 25 Dec 2024 22:25:57 +1100, Daniel70 >> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >>> Rod Speed wrote on 25/12/24 7:18 am: >>>> On Tue, 24 Dec 2024 21:24:20 +1100, Daniel70 >>>> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >>>>> Rod Speed wrote on 23/12/24 5:19 pm: >>>>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 16:32:47 +1100, Trevor Wilson >>>>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 3:44 pm, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:58:40 +1100, Trevor Wilson >>>>>>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: > > <Snip> > >>>>>>>>> Bullshit. Dutton will build exactly ZERO nukes. He will FINALLY >>>>>>>>> crunch the numbers and admit that they are way too expensive. >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Nope. Fact. >>>>>> Can't be a fact until it happens and it won't happen, you watch >>>>>> >>>>>>> Dutton will find out just how much nukes cost and will then >>>>>>> announce that he will not build them. >>>>>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. >>>>>> >>>>>>> He will build gas and coal fired power stations instead, because >>>>>>> they are way cheaper, >>>>>> And aren't viable for anything like as long. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Gina wants him to and he doesn't give a crap about CO2 emissions. >>>>>> Because even if we shut down everything which produces any CO2 >>>>>> including that produced in the manufacture of renewables and the >>>>>> concrete used in the stupid wind towers, it would have no measurabe >>>>>> effect what so ever of world climate or even world CO2 levels >>>>>> because >>>>>> we produce fuck all of that compare with what the rest of the world >>>>>> does and will continue to do forever. >>>> >>>>> You are correct ... to an extent, Roddles. >>>> Completely correct in fact. >>>> >>>>> Last I heard/read Australia was producing about 1.25% of the total >>>>> CO2 even though our population is only approx 0.43% of the worlds >>>>> population. Maybe that 1.25% figure includes the CO2 we produce in >>>>> mining stuff which we then sell to others. >>>> >>>>> In any case, if the rest of the Worlds population don't (also) take >>>>> measures to reduce the increasing atmospheric CO2, WE (AUSTRALIA) >>>>> WILL SUFFER, TOO!! >> >>>> No evidence of any suffering >> >>> Roddles, do you understand the meaning of the word "WILL"?? ... as in >>> "WE (AUSTRALIA) WILL SUFFER, TOO!!"?? >> We should have seen some suffering already if it was going to happen, >> fuckwit > > Oh!! And the Climatic conditions 'we' experience NOW are exactly the > same as those experienced 50, 100, 250 years ago, are they, Roddles?? Fraid so. The impact of bushfires is only different because the population has increased so dramatically and we see a lot more houses built in forested areas than there ever used to be. > I think NOT!! Yep, nothing viable to 'think' with. That was proven when you proved you were completely stupid when you believed the ignorant line that some goon trainer ran that bullets fired from a horisontal gun rise before they fall.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Noddy <me@home.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-23 17:28 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <vkavua$132ud$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #372104 |
On 23/12/2024 4:32 pm, Trevor Wilson wrote: > **Nope. Fact. Dutton will find out just how much nukes cost and will > then announce that he will not build them. He will build gas and coal > fired power stations instead, because they are way cheaper, Gina wants > him to and he doesn't give a crap about CO2 emissions. Put your money where your lunatic mouth is Trev. I'll have a hundred dollar bet with you right here and now that he *doesn't* do that. -- -- -- Regards, Noddy.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-23 17:33 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <lssei1FebtrU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #372107 |
On 23/12/2024 5:28 pm, Noddy wrote:
> On 23/12/2024 4:32 pm, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>
>> **Nope. Fact. Dutton will find out just how much nukes cost and will
>> then announce that he will not build them. He will build gas and coal
>> fired power stations instead, because they are way cheaper, Gina wants
>> him to and he doesn't give a crap about CO2 emissions.
>
> Put your money where your lunatic mouth is Trev. I'll have a hundred
> dollar bet with you right here and now that he *doesn't* do that.
That's 15 years into the future, 10 before first planning approvals.
Nukes aren't going to happen.
--
Xeno
Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-23 18:52 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <vkbfe0$15q1n$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #372109 |
On 23/12/2024 2:33 pm, Xeno wrote: > On 23/12/2024 5:28 pm, Noddy wrote: >> On 23/12/2024 4:32 pm, Trevor Wilson wrote: >> >>> **Nope. Fact. Dutton will find out just how much nukes cost and will >>> then announce that he will not build them. He will build gas and coal >>> fired power stations instead, because they are way cheaper, Gina >>> wants him to and he doesn't give a crap about CO2 emissions. >> >> Put your money where your lunatic mouth is Trev. I'll have a hundred >> dollar bet with you right here and now that he *doesn't* do that. > > That's 15 years into the future, 10 before first planning approvals. > Nukes aren't going to happen. > > > Of course not. Too expensive to build, run, maintain and it will drive energy costs through the roof. There are no upsides to going nuclear. -- In thread "May need to buy petrol soon" Sept 23 2021 11:15:59am Keithr0 wrote: "He made the assertion either he proves it or he is a proven liar." On Sept 23 2021 3:16:29pm Keithr0 wrote: "He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, he is lying."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SAG <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-24 05:23 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <vkcdcf$1bif5$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #372107 |
Noddy wrote: > On 23/12/2024 4:32 pm, Trevor Wilson wrote: > >> **Nope. Fact. Dutton will find out just how much nukes cost and will >> then announce that he will not build them. He will build gas and coal >> fired power stations instead, because they are way cheaper, Gina wants >> him to and he doesn't give a crap about CO2 emissions. > > Put your money where your lunatic mouth is Trev. I'll have a hundred > dollar bet with you right here and now that he *doesn't* do that. How about something that can be resolved much faster? Like... I'll bet $200 that you don't supply any conclusive proof of ever owning a successful business in the S.I.E. within a week. How about it Fraudster? alvey
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-24 15:35 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <lsus0pFqegkU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #372104 |
Trevor Wilson wrote: > On 23/12/2024 3:44 pm, Rod Speed wrote: >> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:58:40 +1100, Trevor Wilson >> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >> >>> On 23/12/2024 2:00 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>> Xeno wrote: >>>>> On 23/12/2024 11:17 am, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>> alvey wrote: >>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Get the facts. radio interview I recorded with Chris Uhlmann, >>>>>>>> award winning journalist and Sky News Political Contributor >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://auslink.info/audio/netzero.mp4 (20Kb) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> or watch the documentary .. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbxpieEQ7bc >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why would anyone interested in this subject bother with a piece >>>>>>> by a political journalist & produced by Murdoch? Try finding >>>>>>> something by qualified experts in the subject. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> so everything that was said is wrong or a lie, is that it? >>>>> >>>>> Depends on what is omitted as much as what is said. >>>>> >>>> anyhow, Dutton will solve the problem when he becomes PM by >>>> building nuclear power plants >>>> >>> >>> Bullshit. Dutton will build exactly ZERO nukes. He will FINALLY >>> crunch the numbers and admit that they are way too expensive. >> >> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. > > **Nope. Fact. Dutton will find out just how much nukes cost and will > then announce that he will not build them. He will build gas and coal > fired power stations instead, because they are way cheaper, Gina wants > him to and he doesn't give a crap about CO2 emissions. > and why should he. our C02 emissions are one poofteenth of SFA -- Have a nice day!.. stay sane, be happy, and enjoy living.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-24 18:26 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <lsv61jFrrvnU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #372160 |
On 24/12/2024 3:35 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
> Trevor Wilson wrote:
>> On 23/12/2024 3:44 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:58:40 +1100, Trevor Wilson
>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 23/12/2024 2:00 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>> Xeno wrote:
>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 11:17 am, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>>>> alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Get the facts. radio interview I recorded with Chris Uhlmann,
>>>>>>>>> award winning journalist and Sky News Political Contributor
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://auslink.info/audio/netzero.mp4 (20Kb)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> or watch the documentary ..
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbxpieEQ7bc
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Why would anyone interested in this subject bother with a piece
>>>>>>>> by a political journalist & produced by Murdoch? Try finding
>>>>>>>> something by qualified experts in the subject.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> so everything that was said is wrong or a lie, is that it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Depends on what is omitted as much as what is said.
>>>>>>
>>>>> anyhow, Dutton will solve the problem when he becomes PM by
>>>>> building nuclear power plants
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bullshit. Dutton will build exactly ZERO nukes. He will FINALLY
>>>> crunch the numbers and admit that they are way too expensive.
>>>
>>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always.
>>
>> **Nope. Fact. Dutton will find out just how much nukes cost and will
>> then announce that he will not build them. He will build gas and coal
>> fired power stations instead, because they are way cheaper, Gina wants
>> him to and he doesn't give a crap about CO2 emissions.
>>
>
> and why should he. our C02 emissions are one poofteenth of SFA
>
Our CO2 emissions are way up there with the world's worst.
--
Xeno
Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-24 20:05 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <lsvbrhFsp5jU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #372172 |
Xeno wrote: > On 24/12/2024 3:35 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote: >> Trevor Wilson wrote: >>> On 23/12/2024 3:44 pm, Rod Speed wrote: >>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:58:40 +1100, Trevor Wilson >>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 23/12/2024 2:00 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>> Xeno wrote: >>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 11:17 am, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>> alvey wrote: >>>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Get the facts. radio interview I recorded with Chris Uhlmann, >>>>>>>>>> award winning journalist and Sky News Political Contributor >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> https://auslink.info/audio/netzero.mp4 (20Kb) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> or watch the documentary .. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbxpieEQ7bc >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Why would anyone interested in this subject bother with a >>>>>>>>> piece by a political journalist & produced by Murdoch? Try >>>>>>>>> finding something by qualified experts in the subject. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> so everything that was said is wrong or a lie, is that it? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Depends on what is omitted as much as what is said. >>>>>>> >>>>>> anyhow, Dutton will solve the problem when he becomes PM by >>>>>> building nuclear power plants >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Bullshit. Dutton will build exactly ZERO nukes. He will FINALLY >>>>> crunch the numbers and admit that they are way too expensive. >>>> >>>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. >>> >>> **Nope. Fact. Dutton will find out just how much nukes cost and will >>> then announce that he will not build them. He will build gas and >>> coal fired power stations instead, because they are way cheaper, >>> Gina wants him to and he doesn't give a crap about CO2 emissions. >>> >> >> and why should he. our C02 emissions are one poofteenth of SFA >> > Our CO2 emissions are way up there with the world's worst. > nup,1.02%. https://www.worldometers.info/co2-emissions/co2-emissions-by-country -- Have a nice day!.. stay sane, be happy, and enjoy living.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | alvey <Factman@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-24 18:37 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <vkdrrm$1ole8$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #372160 |
Mighty Mouse wrote: > Trevor Wilson wrote: >> On 23/12/2024 3:44 pm, Rod Speed wrote: >>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:58:40 +1100, Trevor Wilson >>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >>> >>>> On 23/12/2024 2:00 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>> Xeno wrote: >>>>>> On 23/12/2024 11:17 am, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>> alvey wrote: >>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Get the facts. radio interview I recorded with Chris Uhlmann, >>>>>>>>> award winning journalist and Sky News Political Contributor >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://auslink.info/audio/netzero.mp4 (20Kb) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> or watch the documentary .. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbxpieEQ7bc >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Why would anyone interested in this subject bother with a piece >>>>>>>> by a political journalist & produced by Murdoch? Try finding >>>>>>>> something by qualified experts in the subject. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> so everything that was said is wrong or a lie, is that it? >>>>>> >>>>>> Depends on what is omitted as much as what is said. >>>>>> >>>>> anyhow, Dutton will solve the problem when he becomes PM by >>>>> building nuclear power plants >>>>> >>>> >>>> Bullshit. Dutton will build exactly ZERO nukes. He will FINALLY >>>> crunch the numbers and admit that they are way too expensive. >>> >>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. >> >> **Nope. Fact. Dutton will find out just how much nukes cost and will >> then announce that he will not build them. He will build gas and coal >> fired power stations instead, because they are way cheaper, Gina wants >> him to and he doesn't give a crap about CO2 emissions. >> > > and why should he. our C02 emissions are one poofteenth of SFA As per your recent video/propaganda piece, adjectives aren't worth 2.5g of poo compared to actual numbers. Sooo, rather than the useless boganism, "poofteenth" what actual figure would you guess is Australias' %age contribution of global CO2 output? Oty. alvey -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-24 20:06 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <lsvbssFsp5jU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #372182 |
alvey wrote: > Mighty Mouse wrote: >> Trevor Wilson wrote: >>> On 23/12/2024 3:44 pm, Rod Speed wrote: >>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:58:40 +1100, Trevor Wilson >>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 23/12/2024 2:00 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>> Xeno wrote: >>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 11:17 am, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>> alvey wrote: >>>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Get the facts. radio interview I recorded with Chris Uhlmann, >>>>>>>>>> award winning journalist and Sky News Political Contributor >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> https://auslink.info/audio/netzero.mp4 (20Kb) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> or watch the documentary .. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbxpieEQ7bc >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Why would anyone interested in this subject bother with a >>>>>>>>> piece by a political journalist & produced by Murdoch? Try >>>>>>>>> finding something by qualified experts in the subject. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> so everything that was said is wrong or a lie, is that it? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Depends on what is omitted as much as what is said. >>>>>>> >>>>>> anyhow, Dutton will solve the problem when he becomes PM by >>>>>> building nuclear power plants >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Bullshit. Dutton will build exactly ZERO nukes. He will FINALLY >>>>> crunch the numbers and admit that they are way too expensive. >>>> >>>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. >>> >>> **Nope. Fact. Dutton will find out just how much nukes cost and will >>> then announce that he will not build them. He will build gas and >>> coal fired power stations instead, because they are way cheaper, >>> Gina wants him to and he doesn't give a crap about CO2 emissions. >>> >> >> and why should he. our C02 emissions are one poofteenth of SFA > > As per your recent video/propaganda piece, adjectives aren't worth > 2.5g of poo compared to actual numbers. Sooo, rather than the useless > boganism, "poofteenth" what actual figure would you guess is > Australias' %age contribution of global CO2 output? > > Oty. > no need to guess .. https://www.worldometers.info/co2-emissions/co2-emissions-by-country > > alvey > > -- Have a nice day!.. stay sane, be happy, and enjoy living.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-25 07:41 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <vkf9q3$21kmq$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #372191 |
Mighty Mouse wrote: > alvey wrote: >> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>> Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>> On 23/12/2024 3:44 pm, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:58:40 +1100, Trevor Wilson >>>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 23/12/2024 2:00 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>> Xeno wrote: >>>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 11:17 am, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>> alvey wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Get the facts. radio interview I recorded with Chris Uhlmann, >>>>>>>>>>> award winning journalist and Sky News Political Contributor >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> https://auslink.info/audio/netzero.mp4 (20Kb) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> or watch the documentary .. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbxpieEQ7bc >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Why would anyone interested in this subject bother with a >>>>>>>>>> piece by a political journalist & produced by Murdoch? Try >>>>>>>>>> finding something by qualified experts in the subject. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> so everything that was said is wrong or a lie, is that it? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Depends on what is omitted as much as what is said. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> anyhow, Dutton will solve the problem when he becomes PM by >>>>>>> building nuclear power plants >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Bullshit. Dutton will build exactly ZERO nukes. He will FINALLY >>>>>> crunch the numbers and admit that they are way too expensive. >>>>> >>>>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. >>>> >>>> **Nope. Fact. Dutton will find out just how much nukes cost and will >>>> then announce that he will not build them. He will build gas and >>>> coal fired power stations instead, because they are way cheaper, >>>> Gina wants him to and he doesn't give a crap about CO2 emissions. >>>> >>> >>> and why should he. our C02 emissions are one poofteenth of SFA >> >> As per your recent video/propaganda piece, adjectives aren't worth >> 2.5g of poo compared to actual numbers. Sooo, rather than the useless >> boganism, "poofteenth" what actual figure would you guess is >> Australias' %age contribution of global CO2 output? >> >> Oty. >> > > no need to guess .. > https://www.worldometers.info/co2-emissions/co2-emissions-by-country Ok, a couple of things... Australia is actually responsible for around 4.5% of global CO2 emissions, 80% of which is down to our fossil fuel export. (a) Theoretically, but *extremely* unlikely, we could ban the export of this stuff. As I say, I doubt very much that this could happen, I'm pointing it out to you Murdoch mouthpieces who chant, "There's nothing we can do that would have any effect" as a counterpoint. On your link, which figure(s) on the 'Straya line are, "one poofteenth of SFA"? alvey (a) https://tinyurl.com/nvp6jkt9
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-25 09:27 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <op.2za1z8x1byq249@pvr2.lan> |
| In reply to | #372249 |
On Wed, 25 Dec 2024 08:41:19 +1100, alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> wrote: > Mighty Mouse wrote: >> alvey wrote: >>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>> Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>> On 23/12/2024 3:44 pm, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:58:40 +1100, Trevor Wilson >>>>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 2:00 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>> Xeno wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 11:17 am, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>> alvey wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Get the facts. radio interview I recorded with Chris Uhlmann, >>>>>>>>>>>> award winning journalist and Sky News Political Contributor >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://auslink.info/audio/netzero.mp4 (20Kb) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> or watch the documentary .. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbxpieEQ7bc >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Why would anyone interested in this subject bother with a >>>>>>>>>>> piece by a political journalist & produced by Murdoch? Try >>>>>>>>>>> finding something by qualified experts in the subject. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> so everything that was said is wrong or a lie, is that it? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Depends on what is omitted as much as what is said. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> anyhow, Dutton will solve the problem when he becomes PM by >>>>>>>> building nuclear power plants >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Bullshit. Dutton will build exactly ZERO nukes. He will FINALLY >>>>>>> crunch the numbers and admit that they are way too expensive. >>>>>> >>>>>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. >>>>> >>>>> **Nope. Fact. Dutton will find out just how much nukes cost and will >>>>> then announce that he will not build them. He will build gas and >>>>> coal fired power stations instead, because they are way cheaper, >>>>> Gina wants him to and he doesn't give a crap about CO2 emissions. >>>>> >>>> >>>> and why should he. our C02 emissions are one poofteenth of SFA >>> >>> As per your recent video/propaganda piece, adjectives aren't worth >>> 2.5g of poo compared to actual numbers. Sooo, rather than the useless >>> boganism, "poofteenth" what actual figure would you guess is >>> Australias' %age contribution of global CO2 output? >>> >>> Oty. >>> >> no need to guess .. >> https://www.worldometers.info/co2-emissions/co2-emissions-by-country > > Ok, a couple of things... > Australia is actually responsible for around 4.5% of global CO2 > emissions, Wrong, its actually 1% https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_carbon_dioxide_emissions#Fossil_CO2_emissions_by_country/territory 80% of which is down to our fossil fuel export. (a) That's a bogus number given that we aren't going to ban the export of coal > Theoretically, but *extremely* unlikely, we could ban the export of this > stuff. As I say, I doubt very much that this could happen, I'm pointing > it out to you Murdoch mouthpieces who chant, "There's nothing we can do > that would have any effect" as a counterpoint. Nothing to do with Murdoch, its an undeniable fact > On your link, which figure(s) on the 'Straya line are, "one poofteenth > of SFA"? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_carbon_dioxide_emissions#Fossil_CO2_emissions_by_country/territory > (a) https://tinyurl.com/nvp6jkt9
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | alvey <Hans.Andnees@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-26 06:03 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <vkhoeo$2hldf$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #372249 |
alvey wrote: > Mighty Mouse wrote: >> alvey wrote: >>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>> Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>> On 23/12/2024 3:44 pm, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:58:40 +1100, Trevor Wilson >>>>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 2:00 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>> Xeno wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 11:17 am, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>> alvey wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Get the facts. radio interview I recorded with Chris >>>>>>>>>>>> Uhlmann, award winning journalist and Sky News Political >>>>>>>>>>>> Contributor >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://auslink.info/audio/netzero.mp4 (20Kb) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> or watch the documentary .. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbxpieEQ7bc >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Why would anyone interested in this subject bother with a >>>>>>>>>>> piece by a political journalist & produced by Murdoch? Try >>>>>>>>>>> finding something by qualified experts in the subject. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> so everything that was said is wrong or a lie, is that it? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Depends on what is omitted as much as what is said. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> anyhow, Dutton will solve the problem when he becomes PM by >>>>>>>> building nuclear power plants >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Bullshit. Dutton will build exactly ZERO nukes. He will FINALLY >>>>>>> crunch the numbers and admit that they are way too expensive. >>>>>> >>>>>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. >>>>> >>>>> **Nope. Fact. Dutton will find out just how much nukes cost and >>>>> will then announce that he will not build them. He will build gas >>>>> and coal fired power stations instead, because they are way >>>>> cheaper, Gina wants him to and he doesn't give a crap about CO2 >>>>> emissions. >>>>> >>>> >>>> and why should he. our C02 emissions are one poofteenth of SFA >>> >>> As per your recent video/propaganda piece, adjectives aren't worth >>> 2.5g of poo compared to actual numbers. Sooo, rather than the useless >>> boganism, "poofteenth" what actual figure would you guess is >>> Australias' %age contribution of global CO2 output? >>> >>> Oty. >>> >> >> no need to guess .. >> https://www.worldometers.info/co2-emissions/co2-emissions-by-country > > Ok, a couple of things... > > Australia is actually responsible for around 4.5% of global CO2 > emissions, 80% of which is down to our fossil fuel export. (a) > Theoretically, but *extremely* unlikely, we could ban the export of this > stuff. As I say, I doubt very much that this could happen, I'm pointing > it out to you Murdoch mouthpieces who chant, "There's nothing we can do > that would have any effect" as a counterpoint. > > On your link, which figure(s) on the 'Straya line are, "one poofteenth > of SFA"? Still waiting for your answer on this felix. > > alvey > (a) https://tinyurl.com/nvp6jkt9 > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mighty Mouse <"squeak!"@thecheesefactory.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-26 13:25 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <lt3t4mFkc10U3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #372274 |
alvey wrote: > alvey wrote: >> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>> alvey wrote: >>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>> Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>> On 23/12/2024 3:44 pm, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:58:40 +1100, Trevor Wilson >>>>>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 2:00 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>> Xeno wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 11:17 am, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> alvey wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Get the facts. radio interview I recorded with Chris >>>>>>>>>>>>> Uhlmann, award winning journalist and Sky News Political >>>>>>>>>>>>> Contributor >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://auslink.info/audio/netzero.mp4 (20Kb) >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> or watch the documentary .. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbxpieEQ7bc >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Why would anyone interested in this subject bother with a >>>>>>>>>>>> piece by a political journalist & produced by Murdoch? Try >>>>>>>>>>>> finding something by qualified experts in the subject. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> so everything that was said is wrong or a lie, is that it? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Depends on what is omitted as much as what is said. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> anyhow, Dutton will solve the problem when he becomes PM by >>>>>>>>> building nuclear power plants >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Bullshit. Dutton will build exactly ZERO nukes. He will FINALLY >>>>>>>> crunch the numbers and admit that they are way too expensive. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. >>>>>> >>>>>> **Nope. Fact. Dutton will find out just how much nukes cost and >>>>>> will then announce that he will not build them. He will build gas >>>>>> and coal fired power stations instead, because they are way >>>>>> cheaper, Gina wants him to and he doesn't give a crap about CO2 >>>>>> emissions. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> and why should he. our C02 emissions are one poofteenth of SFA >>>> >>>> As per your recent video/propaganda piece, adjectives aren't worth >>>> 2.5g of poo compared to actual numbers. Sooo, rather than the >>>> useless boganism, "poofteenth" what actual figure would you guess >>>> is Australias' %age contribution of global CO2 output? >>>> >>>> Oty. >>>> >>> >>> no need to guess .. >>> https://www.worldometers.info/co2-emissions/co2-emissions-by-country >> >> Ok, a couple of things... >> >> Australia is actually responsible for around 4.5% of global CO2 >> emissions, 80% of which is down to our fossil fuel export. (a) >> Theoretically, but *extremely* unlikely, we could ban the export of >> this stuff. As I say, I doubt very much that this could happen, I'm >> pointing it out to you Murdoch mouthpieces who chant, "There's >> nothing we can do that would have any effect" as a counterpoint. >> >> On your link, which figure(s) on the 'Straya line are, "one >> poofteenth of SFA"? > > Still waiting for your answer on this felix. > > > number 16. isn't it obvious? > >> >> alvey >> (a) https://tinyurl.com/nvp6jkt9 >> >> > -- Have a nice day!.. stay sane, be happy, and enjoy living.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | alvey <Factman@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-26 14:16 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <vkilbq$2q9a6$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #372279 |
Mighty Mouse wrote: > alvey wrote: >> alvey wrote: >>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>> alvey wrote: >>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>> Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 3:44 pm, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:58:40 +1100, Trevor Wilson >>>>>>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 2:00 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Xeno wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 11:17 am, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> alvey wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Get the facts. radio interview I recorded with Chris >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Uhlmann, award winning journalist and Sky News Political >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Contributor >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://auslink.info/audio/netzero.mp4 (20Kb) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> or watch the documentary .. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbxpieEQ7bc >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Why would anyone interested in this subject bother with a >>>>>>>>>>>>> piece by a political journalist & produced by Murdoch? Try >>>>>>>>>>>>> finding something by qualified experts in the subject. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> so everything that was said is wrong or a lie, is that it? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Depends on what is omitted as much as what is said. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> anyhow, Dutton will solve the problem when he becomes PM by >>>>>>>>>> building nuclear power plants >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Bullshit. Dutton will build exactly ZERO nukes. He will FINALLY >>>>>>>>> crunch the numbers and admit that they are way too expensive. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> **Nope. Fact. Dutton will find out just how much nukes cost and >>>>>>> will then announce that he will not build them. He will build gas >>>>>>> and coal fired power stations instead, because they are way >>>>>>> cheaper, Gina wants him to and he doesn't give a crap about CO2 >>>>>>> emissions. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> and why should he. our C02 emissions are one poofteenth of SFA >>>>> >>>>> As per your recent video/propaganda piece, adjectives aren't worth >>>>> 2.5g of poo compared to actual numbers. Sooo, rather than the >>>>> useless boganism, "poofteenth" what actual figure would you guess >>>>> is Australias' %age contribution of global CO2 output? >>>>> >>>>> Oty. >>>>> >>>> >>>> no need to guess .. >>>> https://www.worldometers.info/co2-emissions/co2-emissions-by-country >>> >>> Ok, a couple of things... >>> >>> Australia is actually responsible for around 4.5% of global CO2 >>> emissions, 80% of which is down to our fossil fuel export. (a) >>> Theoretically, but *extremely* unlikely, we could ban the export of >>> this stuff. As I say, I doubt very much that this could happen, I'm >>> pointing it out to you Murdoch mouthpieces who chant, "There's >>> nothing we can do that would have any effect" as a counterpoint. >>> >>> On your link, which figure(s) on the 'Straya line are, "one >>> poofteenth of SFA"? >> >> Still waiting for your answer on this felix. >> >> >> > > number 16. isn't it obvious? Well, No. If #16 is "one poofteenth of SFA" then your scale is bizarre. #16 on that list means that Oz is in the *top* decile. So you'll be revising your opinion of what Australia's contribution is then? alvey Incidentally, one of the leading loudmouths in perpetrating this lie about Ozs' contribution being "one poofteenth of SFA" is, no, not the Bumhole (Vic) Boofhead. It's a far more influential right-wing ratbag who's current facing a mass of paedo charges. Alan Jones. His infamous 'grain of rice' piece on TV was disgraceful. > >> >>> >>> alvey >>> (a) https://tinyurl.com/nvp6jkt9 >>> >>> >> > > -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | alvey <Factman@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-26 15:18 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <vkioua$2qsf3$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #372282 |
alvey wrote: > Mighty Mouse wrote: >> alvey wrote: >>> alvey wrote: >>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>> alvey wrote: >>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>> Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 3:44 pm, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:58:40 +1100, Trevor Wilson >>>>>>>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 2:00 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Xeno wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 11:17 am, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> alvey wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Get the facts. radio interview I recorded with Chris >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Uhlmann, award winning journalist and Sky News Political >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Contributor >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://auslink.info/audio/netzero.mp4 (20Kb) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or watch the documentary .. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbxpieEQ7bc >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why would anyone interested in this subject bother with a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> piece by a political journalist & produced by Murdoch? Try >>>>>>>>>>>>>> finding something by qualified experts in the subject. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> so everything that was said is wrong or a lie, is that it? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Depends on what is omitted as much as what is said. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> anyhow, Dutton will solve the problem when he becomes PM by >>>>>>>>>>> building nuclear power plants >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Bullshit. Dutton will build exactly ZERO nukes. He will >>>>>>>>>> FINALLY crunch the numbers and admit that they are way too >>>>>>>>>> expensive. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> **Nope. Fact. Dutton will find out just how much nukes cost and >>>>>>>> will then announce that he will not build them. He will build >>>>>>>> gas and coal fired power stations instead, because they are way >>>>>>>> cheaper, Gina wants him to and he doesn't give a crap about CO2 >>>>>>>> emissions. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> and why should he. our C02 emissions are one poofteenth of SFA >>>>>> >>>>>> As per your recent video/propaganda piece, adjectives aren't worth >>>>>> 2.5g of poo compared to actual numbers. Sooo, rather than the >>>>>> useless boganism, "poofteenth" what actual figure would you guess >>>>>> is Australias' %age contribution of global CO2 output? >>>>>> >>>>>> Oty. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> no need to guess .. >>>>> https://www.worldometers.info/co2-emissions/co2-emissions-by-country >>>> >>>> Ok, a couple of things... >>>> >>>> Australia is actually responsible for around 4.5% of global CO2 >>>> emissions, 80% of which is down to our fossil fuel export. (a) >>>> Theoretically, but *extremely* unlikely, we could ban the export of >>>> this stuff. As I say, I doubt very much that this could happen, I'm >>>> pointing it out to you Murdoch mouthpieces who chant, "There's >>>> nothing we can do that would have any effect" as a counterpoint. >>>> >>>> On your link, which figure(s) on the 'Straya line are, "one >>>> poofteenth of SFA"? >>> >>> Still waiting for your answer on this felix. >>> >>> >>> >> >> number 16. isn't it obvious? > > Well, No. If #16 is "one poofteenth of SFA" then your scale is bizarre. > #16 on that list means that Oz is in the *top* decile. So you'll be > revising your opinion of what Australia's contribution is then? > No response then? -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-26 16:31 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <lt4820Flsi9U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #372282 |
On 26/12/2024 3:16 pm, alvey wrote:
> Mighty Mouse wrote:
>> alvey wrote:
>>> alvey wrote:
>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>> alvey wrote:
>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>>>> Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 3:44 pm, Rod Speed wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:58:40 +1100, Trevor Wilson
>>>>>>>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 2:00 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Xeno wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 11:17 am, Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> alvey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Get the facts. radio interview I recorded with Chris
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Uhlmann, award winning journalist and Sky News Political
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Contributor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://auslink.info/audio/netzero.mp4 (20Kb)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or watch the documentary ..
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbxpieEQ7bc
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why would anyone interested in this subject bother with a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piece by a political journalist & produced by Murdoch? Try
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> finding something by qualified experts in the subject.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> so everything that was said is wrong or a lie, is that it?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Depends on what is omitted as much as what is said.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> anyhow, Dutton will solve the problem when he becomes PM by
>>>>>>>>>>> building nuclear power plants
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Bullshit. Dutton will build exactly ZERO nukes. He will
>>>>>>>>>> FINALLY crunch the numbers and admit that they are way too
>>>>>>>>>> expensive.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> **Nope. Fact. Dutton will find out just how much nukes cost and
>>>>>>>> will then announce that he will not build them. He will build
>>>>>>>> gas and coal fired power stations instead, because they are way
>>>>>>>> cheaper, Gina wants him to and he doesn't give a crap about CO2
>>>>>>>> emissions.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and why should he. our C02 emissions are one poofteenth of SFA
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As per your recent video/propaganda piece, adjectives aren't worth
>>>>>> 2.5g of poo compared to actual numbers. Sooo, rather than the
>>>>>> useless boganism, "poofteenth" what actual figure would you guess
>>>>>> is Australias' %age contribution of global CO2 output?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oty.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> no need to guess .. https://www.worldometers.info/co2-emissions/
>>>>> co2-emissions-by-country
>>>>
>>>> Ok, a couple of things...
>>>>
>>>> Australia is actually responsible for around 4.5% of global CO2
>>>> emissions, 80% of which is down to our fossil fuel export. (a)
>>>> Theoretically, but *extremely* unlikely, we could ban the export of
>>>> this stuff. As I say, I doubt very much that this could happen, I'm
>>>> pointing it out to you Murdoch mouthpieces who chant, "There's
>>>> nothing we can do that would have any effect" as a counterpoint.
>>>>
>>>> On your link, which figure(s) on the 'Straya line are, "one
>>>> poofteenth of SFA"?
>>>
>>> Still waiting for your answer on this felix.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> number 16. isn't it obvious?
>
> Well, No. If #16 is "one poofteenth of SFA" then your scale is bizarre.
> #16 on that list means that Oz is in the *top* decile. So you'll be
> revising your opinion of what Australia's contribution is then?
>
I'm looking at the countries *below* Australia. It's a worry when we get
pipped at the post by, say, France, UK, Italy. We're even knocking on
the doors of Canada and South Korea. And South Korea doesn't even
*export* fossil fuels.
>
>
> alvey
> Incidentally, one of the leading loudmouths in perpetrating this lie
> about Ozs' contribution being "one poofteenth of SFA" is, no, not the
> Bumhole (Vic) Boofhead. It's a far more influential right-wing ratbag
> who's current facing a mass of paedo charges. Alan Jones. His infamous
> 'grain of rice' piece on TV was disgraceful.
Good to see that loudmouth get his comeuppance.
--
Xeno
Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | alvey <Factman@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-26 17:40 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <vkj19o$2sdf7$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #372287 |
Xeno wrote: > On 26/12/2024 3:16 pm, alvey wrote: >> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>> alvey wrote: >>>> alvey wrote: >>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>> alvey wrote: >>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>> Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 3:44 pm, Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:58:40 +1100, Trevor Wilson >>>>>>>>>> <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 2:00 pm, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Xeno wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/12/2024 11:17 am, Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> alvey wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mighty Mouse wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Get the facts. radio interview I recorded with Chris >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Uhlmann, award winning journalist and Sky News Political >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Contributor >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://auslink.info/audio/netzero.mp4 (20Kb) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or watch the documentary .. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbxpieEQ7bc >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why would anyone interested in this subject bother with a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piece by a political journalist & produced by Murdoch? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Try finding something by qualified experts in the subject. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> so everything that was said is wrong or a lie, is that it? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Depends on what is omitted as much as what is said. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> anyhow, Dutton will solve the problem when he becomes PM by >>>>>>>>>>>> building nuclear power plants >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Bullshit. Dutton will build exactly ZERO nukes. He will >>>>>>>>>>> FINALLY crunch the numbers and admit that they are way too >>>>>>>>>>> expensive. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Completely off with the fucking fairys, as always. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> **Nope. Fact. Dutton will find out just how much nukes cost and >>>>>>>>> will then announce that he will not build them. He will build >>>>>>>>> gas and coal fired power stations instead, because they are way >>>>>>>>> cheaper, Gina wants him to and he doesn't give a crap about CO2 >>>>>>>>> emissions. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> and why should he. our C02 emissions are one poofteenth of SFA >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As per your recent video/propaganda piece, adjectives aren't >>>>>>> worth 2.5g of poo compared to actual numbers. Sooo, rather than >>>>>>> the useless boganism, "poofteenth" what actual figure would you >>>>>>> guess is Australias' %age contribution of global CO2 output? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Oty. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> no need to guess .. https://www.worldometers.info/co2-emissions/ >>>>>> co2-emissions-by-country >>>>> >>>>> Ok, a couple of things... >>>>> >>>>> Australia is actually responsible for around 4.5% of global CO2 >>>>> emissions, 80% of which is down to our fossil fuel export. (a) >>>>> Theoretically, but *extremely* unlikely, we could ban the export of >>>>> this stuff. As I say, I doubt very much that this could happen, I'm >>>>> pointing it out to you Murdoch mouthpieces who chant, "There's >>>>> nothing we can do that would have any effect" as a counterpoint. >>>>> >>>>> On your link, which figure(s) on the 'Straya line are, "one >>>>> poofteenth of SFA"? >>>> >>>> Still waiting for your answer on this felix. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> number 16. isn't it obvious? >> >> Well, No. If #16 is "one poofteenth of SFA" then your scale is >> bizarre. #16 on that list means that Oz is in the *top* decile. So >> you'll be revising your opinion of what Australia's contribution is then? >> > I'm looking at the countries *below* Australia. It's a worry when we get > pipped at the post by, say, France, UK, Italy. We're even knocking on > the doors of Canada and South Korea. Yep. It's extraordinary that this blurt about Oz CO2 output being 'a grain of rice in a bowlfull', or "a poofteenth of SFA" has ever been made. Extraordinary, but depressing. alvey -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 10 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | aus.cars
csiph-web