Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > aus.aviation > #27419
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | aus.aviation |
| Subject | Re: So we got it right, never was going to survive |
| Date | 2024-05-04 12:46 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <op.2m77a9vzbyq249@pvr2.lan> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <op.2m01oqivbyq249@pvr2.lan> <op.2m03lqdsbyq249@pvr2.lan> <l9jq8dF2mt9U1@mid.individual.net> <op.2m7g9vrkbyq249@pvr2.lan> <l9l9o1F9l9oU1@mid.individual.net> |
Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> wrote > Rod Speed wrote >> keithr0 <user@account.invalid> wrote >>> Rod Speed wrote >>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote >>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote >>>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote >>>>>>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-04-30/bonza-flights-cancelled-business-viability-question/103783236 >>>>>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-04-30/who-owns-bonza-whats-happening-with-the-airline-cancellations/103784224 >>>>> https://www.afr.com/companies/transport/bonza-flights-cancelled-as-aircraft-repossessed-20240430-p5fnjf >>>> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-04-30/bonza-doomed-to-failure-from-the-start/103785860 >>> The lease payments on the brand new 737 MAXswould have been the first >>> problem. >> The real problem was the fucked business model, using planes >> that size to regional airports. No chance of filling aircraft like that >> at regional airports. And only flying to one state capital, Melburg. >> That was never going to be viable. > I was just reading an article in the ABC news, it stated that those > aircraft were "forced" onto the Bonza by it backer 777 partners simply > because their aircraft leasing partner had 30 737 Max's available. No ABC news article ever said that. > The Bonza boss is also saying that heneeded at least 10 aircraft to be > viable Yes, he did say that but that is even sillier given that he couldnt even manage to fill 4. > but they would only let him have 4 That's wrong too. And if that was true, it was because they clearly were not producing anything like the cash flow to pay the lease costs on that many planes. > so as you say it was doomed the start. > Even with the right size and number or aircraft it was still goingto > but at least it would of had a small chance of success. Not with just the one state capital being flown to.
Back to aus.aviation | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
So we got it right, never was going to survive "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-04-30 09:35 +1000
Re: So we got it right, never was going to survive "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-04-30 14:53 +1000
Re: So we got it right, never was going to survive Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2024-04-30 15:27 +1000
Re: So we got it right, never was going to survive "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-04-30 16:00 +1000
Re: So we got it right, never was going to survive Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2024-04-30 22:24 +1000
Re: So we got it right, never was going to survive "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-05-01 04:32 +1000
Re: So we got it right, never was going to survive jonz <not-here@over-there.org> - 2024-05-07 14:52 +1000
Re: So we got it right, never was going to survive Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2024-05-07 20:17 +1000
Re: So we got it right, never was going to survive "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-04-30 16:01 +1000
Re: So we got it right, never was going to survive "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-04-30 16:42 +1000
Re: So we got it right, never was going to survive keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2024-05-03 19:49 +1000
Re: So we got it right, never was going to survive "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-05-04 03:23 +1000
Re: So we got it right, never was going to survive Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2024-05-04 09:19 +1000
Re: So we got it right, never was going to survive "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-05-04 12:46 +1000
Re: So we got it right, never was going to survive Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2024-05-04 14:28 +1000
Re: So we got it right, never was going to survive "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-05-04 15:41 +1000
Re: So we got it right, never was going to survive "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-05-04 07:37 +1000
Re: So we got it right, never was going to survive keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2024-05-11 11:23 +1000
Re: So we got it right, never was going to survive "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2024-05-12 05:48 +1000
csiph-web