Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.usenet.kooks > #653808 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-21 16:31 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-03-29 08:07 +0200 |
| Articles | 17 on this page of 77 — 10 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.usenet.kooks
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-21 16:31 +0100
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 05:41 +0100
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 15:45 +0100
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-22 09:37 -0600
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-23 00:00 +0800
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-22 10:38 -0600
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-23 04:40 +0100
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 16:52 +0100
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-23 04:57 +0100
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-23 17:47 +0100
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-24 06:46 +0100
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-24 19:18 +0100
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-25 06:52 +0100
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-25 18:08 +0100
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-26 07:29 +0100
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-26 17:10 +0100
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-28 07:27 +0200
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-28 18:27 +0200
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-29 07:19 +0200
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-29 08:49 +0200
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-29 07:09 +0200
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-29 20:05 +0200
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-30 02:46 +0800
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-29 18:11 -0700
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-30 05:31 +0200
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-30 05:02 -0600
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-30 11:12 -0400
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". "Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5" <noemail@none.not> - 2016-03-30 11:40 -0400
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-30 11:44 -0400
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-30 17:19 +0100
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-30 13:10 -0400
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". "Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5" <noemail@none.not> - 2016-03-30 13:22 -0400
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-30 13:24 -0400
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". "Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5" <noemail@none.not> - 2016-03-30 13:21 -0400
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-30 13:22 -0400
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". "Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5" <noemail@none.not> - 2016-03-30 13:31 -0400
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-30 15:33 -0400
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". "Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5" <noemail@none.not> - 2016-03-30 16:10 -0400
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-30 16:52 -0400
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". "Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5" <noemail@none.not> - 2016-03-30 17:01 -0400
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-30 15:04 -0600
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-30 17:53 -0400
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-30 17:45 -0400
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-31 07:04 +0100
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-30 19:24 +0200
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-30 19:45 +0100
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-31 03:30 +0800
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-30 15:36 -0400
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-31 07:04 +0100
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". "Bill (not Jillians) DoW #5" <noemail@none.not> - 2016-03-30 13:19 -0400
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-30 13:20 -0400
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-30 17:18 +0100
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-03-30 17:55 +0000
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-30 11:55 -0700
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-31 05:45 +0200
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-30 21:58 -0700
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2016-03-30 22:01 -0700
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-03-30 22:13 -0700
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-31 07:04 +0100
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-30 23:52 -0700
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-31 18:35 +0200
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-31 10:56 -0600
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-31 13:04 -0400
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-31 04:17 -0600
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-29 07:25 +0200
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-29 19:21 +0200
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-07 08:11 +0200
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-08 09:05 +0200
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-08 10:16 +0200
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-08 18:28 +0200
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-09 07:27 +0200
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-08 20:20 +0200
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-08 19:53 +0200
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-07 08:11 +0200
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-08 08:54 +0200
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-09 07:11 +0200
Re: NOY: "You're now denying Coulomb's Law". Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-29 08:07 +0200
Page 4 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-31 18:35 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <9ba40c31f7392aed23faa9cf27abdd3e@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #655611 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Jim "Jism Junkie Gerbil Cannon" Gorman (aka Chimpy the Coin-Slot
Operated SuckMonkey, aka Checkmate The PickleTickler), socked up as
Mustaffa Sheboygan, in
<news:MPG.31664e451bf90a0798cc3d@news.altopia.com> did thusly jump
head first into the wood chipper again:
> In article <c992c74cc05996f4d790f3085ffa4cd7@dizum.com>,
> Chimpy's Usenet Lord and Master
> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> says...
>> Now let's consider the photographic evidence...
> Already done... you stole a picture of someone else's REAL Lotus,
> reversed the image, and claimed it was yours. You're guilty of Petty
> Theft Auto Image, and acting all petty in public. Now flounce for us!
Chimpy's an ignorant gay lying faggot slut. And he's starting his next
meltdown. LOL
Why can't you deny your own faggoty words, Chimpy? Why can't you
refute the truthiness in my .sig, Chimpy?
<snicker>
Chimpy has insisted for *years* that a vagina was actually "a man's
gaping asshole and a pair of balls" (Chimpy's words) because he's *so*
gay that even when he looks straight at a vagina, all he sees is "a
man's gaping asshole and a pair of balls" (Chimpy's words). That's
because Chimpy *is* the "throbbing pulse of faggotry" (Chimpy's
words). That's why Chimpy responds to the name "Ignorant Gay Lying
Faggot Slut". LOL
Chimpy had the goatse image in his fapfolder, so when I posted that
picture of a gaping vagina in reference to his story about "the one
who got away" thinking that a ragged-out crack whore would be the
*best* Chimpy could hope to attract, Chimpy immediately launched into
a years-long rant about his "lost love" being the goatse image.
How else would Chimpy know that the "lost love" image was an altered
version of the goatse image to show a vagina rather than male dangly
bits, and why would he insist for *years* that his "lost love"
actually had male dangly bits? LOL!
A paraphrasing of what Chimpy was essentially ranting for *years*:
"Nuhhh-uhhhh! That image is supposed to be the goatse image! I should
know, I have it in my fapfolder and it was *my* "lost love"! You will
immediately change the image of my lost love back to having a "man's
gaping asshole", "gaping asshole and balls", "giant ball-like labia"
and "a nut sack swinging" or I'll stamp my high heels and hit you with
my purse!" LOL!
Take, for instance, this emoticon: :(
And now I'll change it to: :-)
But Chimpy will insist it's still a noseless sad-face emoticon because
he was caught insisting that the picture of his "lost love" was
actually the goatse image and that his "lost love" actually had a
"man's gaping asshole" (Chimpy's words), "gaping asshole and balls"
(Chimpy's words), "giant ball-like labia" (Chimpy's words) and "a nut
sack swinging" (Chimpy's words)... he has no other choice but to
insist that every altered image is still the original and therefore
that his "lost love" *was* a man as he's insisted for years... which
makes him the "throbbing pulse of faggotry" (Chimpy's words) LOL
Message-ID: <31e4747ee7179064b1fdd5266cd08d72@dizum.com>
================================================================
She's the fish that got away, all because Chimpy didn't have $5 or a
rock of crack as payment. She was...
/ \ \ / \
| | | |
| ' `. ASSHOLE | :
\ | | \| |
\ | / v \\ :
/\ \/ _-- __| \ |
/ \ \_-~ / (*) \ ~-\ |
| \_ \ _/-------\.____,_\| |
\ \ \_,____// _ ___ _ (____> / |
\,___\ < ___) ______ (_____> /
^ /\ | < ____)/ \(_____> |_/\
| / /\| <_____) | (___> / \
BOOB | ( _<____)\_______/ /// _/ / \
| \ \_ \\\_________/// (__/ \
| \ \___) \`--\\_//--'/ /|
| \ / \ / |
| \_ / ^ \ _/ |
| / | \ |
| / / VAGINA \ |
| / / \ |
| / | |
| | | |
....that big. But unlike fishermen's tales of "the one that got away",
this one doesn't get bigger with time, only smaller.
================================================================
Note the labeling so Chimpy can find his way around unfamiliar
territory. LOL!
Come to find out, Chimpy's "lost love" was a result of a hard drive
crash. LOL!
===============================================================
Message-ID: <4af9faf781574d85240bcd2d06d7a9db@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <cc6ce0e71e2718523441a614bc8d9f84@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <69b99d078b48ab360354cf8167ef141d@dizum.com>
Checkmate wrote of his "unhappy childhood experiences" (Chimpy's
words) of receiving "belly-rubbing faggoty bum-stuffing" (Chimpy's
words) from his "belly-rubbing, bum-stuffing drunkard daddy" (Chimpy's
words), and what his "belly-rubbing horndog homodaddy" (Chimpy's
words) "did to his asshole... like turn it inside-out" (Chimpy's
words), an experience that was like "trying to stuff the toothpaste
back into the tube" (Chimpy's words) which caused him to become the
"poor pathetic bum-stuffed son of a drunken faggot" (Chimpy's words)
who propositions guys with lines like "I'd like to tickle his ass"
(Chimpy's words), "My penis will spit in your face." (Chimpy's words)
and "He could do us both at the same time." (Chimpy's words).
One must wonder if his father realizes "the monster he created when he
was butt-fucking his own son?" (Chimpy's words) because "this isn't
something a normal person dreams up" (Chimpy's words), "this is
something that obviously happened" (Chimpy's words), because "nobody
plucks those kind of details out of thin air" (Chimpy's words), so it
had to be his "own personal experience" (Chimpy's words).
===============================================================
But that was just the beginning, poor Chimpy gives off such a gay vibe
that he is molested everywhere he goes:
Message-ID: <d0a42c55ff9c918eaab1241d3c4cec3e@dizum.com>
===============================================================
> I think what it means, is that you don't need to worry about waking up
> from the anesthesia with your pants around your ankles, laying face-down
> in the dental chair, with the dentist telling you you can spit now.
===============================================================
Let's add some emphasis to better suss the meaning of Chimpy's words:
===============================================================
> I think what it means, is that *you* don't need to "worry" about waking up
> from the anesthesia with *your* pants around *your* ankles, laying face-down
> in the dental chair, with the dentist telling you *you* can spit now.
===============================================================
But apparently Chimpy's *so* gay he does need to "worry" (read: hope)
that he wakes up in that condition. LOL
So in short, Chimpy is a real-world Mr. Garrison from South Park. He
drives around in his little pooftercar honking his bulb-horn and
shouting "I am NOT gaaaaaay! I dare any man to pound my ass to prove
iiiiit! I guarantee I'll pretend to not like it no matter how hard you
pounnnnnd.".
Melt, Chimpy, melt.
Froth, Chimpy, froth.
Dance, Chimpy, dance!
Muahahaha, etc.
You ignorant gay lying faggot slut.
<snicker>
--
FNVWe:
"The Man Who Spanked Chimpy Checkmate The Cowardly CockSmoker Out Of
AUK, Then Out Of The Flonk, Then Into Insanity, Then Made Him Run Away
Like A Little Spankard Bitch. Again."
In which Checkmate admits to being a faggot and fantasizing about men:
MID: <feb093af883d0bf288e85863264900ed@dizum.com>
MID: <ab050c692202f7d955f7d2876fd39d56@dizum.com>
In which Checkmate says he wants to spank guys all night long:
MID: <k3m5ls$3pr$1@news.mixmin.net>
In which Checkmate confesses his desire to fuck who he claims is a
guy:
MID: <k3oolf$cpe$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <k9nj0v$u4a$2@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <l8ogd6$1cd$4@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <lclrtd$eei$4@news.mixmin.net>
In which Checkmate admits he'd definitely fuck a male dog:
MID: <k2h0j1$6ll$5@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <k4dsc7$l32$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <k5m8o5$vmq$5@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
In which Checkmate admits to having a golden showers fetish:
MID: <k79p80$9ps$3@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <k8t9l0$nf0$5@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <k8t9kv$nev$5@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <k994eg$77l$1@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <k9i8is$sna$3@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <lf3noh$sqv$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <76b587bf03232be29596c7a5e11f8eef@dizum.com>
MID: <d1590e1490afb94915166440ceb1190f@dizum.com>
MID: <4c614669bd9da0e2ab54c7a8618864f2@dizum.com>
In which Checkmate asks a guy for a blowjob (again):
MID: <ka4m1r$8rs$2@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <knd50p$7ni$2@news.albasani.net>
MID: <knnmme$3a4$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <kp77db$rqk$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <kvvjjb$a8t$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <kvvjjb$a8u$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l069qt$g3j$9@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l1b6g1$qqv$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l65hh2$jpd$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l9b7ha$ret$4@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <lfe72e$q0s$4@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <lffimp$k2f$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <13de9e018d33aa5c02a89f8acfd8c2f8@dizum.com>
MID: <ddfe5035129d525fb2c441289a7b3c1b@dizum.com>
MID: <8352c247386df60552fec12941ad0c47@dizum.com>
MID: <863c1b2a4221005e6d5252e4b2f955b1@dizum.com>
MID: <9d7e6e672aa61c16813ade0f2815d0bf@dizum.com>
MID: <aacd887c22128680f39ec3ca7f7e1613@dizum.com>
MID: <372519cc110e5acf0d73268cb1a697e9@dizum.com>
MID: <1b8820753ce4e2da87b17874d123f783@dizum.com>
Checkmate's got a thing about tickling guy's asses with random
objects:
MID: <l8rapt$rfm$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <lfm4f8$3jb$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <li2ao1$3rf$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <37fb49820eaf36d0a45e91ce73d37d44@dizum.com>
MID: <13badb999438389ea8894228e51614a3@dizum.com>
MID: <2ce704d96dbf41ca89fd9eda221cb83c@dizum.com>
MID: <f9b10e223db85839d004420449391270@dizum.com>
MID: <184091e3de3a10096805606ec6dc5866@dizum.com>
MID: <ee740ba6bc409af0d2b4a66170b4e4d7@dizum.com>
MID: <d1d62217afbcbf98470365178072415a@dizum.com>
MID: <ac96244a69bc75dd3a60e8defda0b966@dizum.com>
MID: <9f02c35ef6d67ac06ee55f90199c3aaa@dizum.com>
MID: <3e4b3a8bb953839b7d2658130dcb927e@dizum.com>
MID: <9ec2ad3439122a906207c9f74c4a3a06@dizum.com>
MID: <761ef52f7fc54d46dd50e2692e160d92@dizum.com>
MID: <8ef71d83a5af476e6e275ea23b984323@dizum.com>
Checkmate's so gay he repeatedly insists that a picture of a vagina is
actually an asshole and balls... he went on and on about assholes and
balls... couldn't shut up about them... come to find out, he was just
trying to tell us that his lost love was actually a man:
MID: <l84jo7$cnd$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l84oip$icu$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l85ste$ao$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l87aud$saf$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l88ptv$nlj$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l8dvdt$tj2$4@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l8kl20$91i$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l8psgt$m7d$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l8rapv$rfm$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l98brg$6hp$6@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <ldg914$pel$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <31e4747ee7179064b1fdd5266cd08d72@dizum.com>
MID: <4dba3edb9556cb8d94bc7b90f3b0c8f0@dizum.com>
Chimpy the neurotic overwrought hysterical hissy-fit ninny escalates
his prescription drug abuse to "calm the fuck down" (Chimpy's words):
MID: <512f192b17a529cc6d490a55c43ac1be@dizum.com> - Oxy, Neurontin
MID: <kjucol$ckr$3@newsfeed.x-privat.org> - Oxy, Vicodin
MID: <kmqoip$cg3$8@news.albasani.net> - Norco
MID: <knc9l2$e66$2@news.albasani.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6lnn79.ppd.17.10@news.alt.net> - Oxycodone, Vicodin
MID: <6lo0dt.b7.17.4@news.alt.net> - Xanax
MID: <krt925$u63$3@news.mixmin.net> - N2O
MID: <6o9mv7.7ra.17.1@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6os03j.f3.19.2@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6p12vg.of8.19.2@news.alt.net> - Marijuana
MID: <6pg2lv.v27.17.2@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <kuqmlq$mi7$1@news.mixmin.net> - Amphetamine (!)
MID: <6qprvj.ndm.17.1@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6r26ti.ju0.19.2@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6stbk8.pbh.19.43@news.alt.net> - Ecstasy
MID: <l1b6g2$qr0$2@news.mixmin.net> - Vicodin
MID: <l5kd53$8kd$1@news.mixmin.net> - Norco
MID: <lanvc8$f06$2@news.mixmin.net> - Norco
MID: <larrim$lft$1@news.mixmin.net> - N2O
MID: <lcckii$mue$3@news.mixmin.net> - N2O
MID: <e7848d7ebc7f0b52e126bc35d82a65cf@dizum.com> - Hydrocodone,
Alprazolam
MID: <MPG.2eb9f496c779fc2998a54c@news.alt.net> - Percocet
Chimpy Checkmate's Famous Faggotisms:
=====================================
Chimpy tries enticing a straight man who lives with a woman to join
him in his lonely faggoty lifestyle:
Message-ID: <b1ae7a665b08a82e652e819482238fbd@dizum.com>
"How about I put the squirrel up your ass to keep your gerbil
company?"
Chimpy's desperate plea to a dude:
MID: <5b690abba10d04da8f7675d278f2c2b8@dizum.com>
"Diddle me!"
MID: <07b50fac74279fabaf78a605899b7934@dizum.com>
"Trojans are a condiment."
Chimpy discusses his new boyfriend, Dave "SnuhWolf" Norris:
MID: <c565ada4723ca2e5cd1259cf8a1d86df@dizum.com>
"Snuhbaby makes a good cock warmer."
MID: <ffd2a514115a20cb3122e71b81907a1f@dizum.com>
"Pack your donut hole, any time, anywhere!"
Chimpy discussing the relative merits of 4 inches versus 10 inches:
MID: <b62ad5949e43f36901836bb59898426a@dizum.com>
"Plus, I suppose it doesn't hurt as much when they stuff it up your
butt."
MID: <MPG.2a5ec5516fc9605298b5ac@news.alt.net>
"Best you keester a kielbasa."
Message-ID: <kvvjjb$a8t$3@news.mixmin.net>
"Brag about it to my dick."
"My dick can't quite hear you, could you come a little closer?"
MID: <knnmmb$3a4$1@news.mixmin.net>
"If you see a dick, suck it."
MID: <6qft9a.g1f.19.1@news.alt.net>
"The Winchester 1892 would make a damned-good dildo."
MID: <l61jjg$tth$1@news.mixmin.net>
"Pump a rump."
MID: <l9d76m$k1v$4@news.mixmin.net>
"You gerbils are always in the dark."
MID: <lal84d$g2u$5@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <97bfaeca4f3abe27b5f6683e319cdb18@dizum.com>
"I gotta gay named Guido from Jersey"
MID: <lamgt8$b2d$1@news.mixmin.net>
"If they're soft, yer probably blowin' it all wrong."
MID: <lchub0$q96$5@news.mixmin.net>
"Hitler would have made a damned good Queen."
MID: <lcsgjb$obk$2@news.mixmin.net>
"Don't get slapped by the cocks you crave."
MID: <b068d280517a2d6c831d4a43f2cc8d31@dizum.com>
To a nearly toothless man:
"I wouldn't pay you to suck my dick if your last tooth fell out."
So Chimpy prefers paying *nearly* toothless men for blowjobs, but not
*fully* toothless men. LOL
MID: <afe97a65ff77e7382ad77cf18ea63e85@dizum.com>
"If I send you some money, will you suck Greg's dick?"
Chimpy likes to watch. LOL
MID: <9d7e6e672aa61c16813ade0f2815d0bf@dizum.com>
"Suck my clit."
Chimpy's proposition to a tranny sucking faggot who gets around being
gay by claiming tranny cocks are 'huge dangling clits'. LOL
Chimpy is confused again: "giant ball-like labia". LOL
MID: <4dba3edb9556cb8d94bc7b90f3b0c8f0@dizum.com>
=====================================
What a FAG!
Melt, Chimpy, melt.
Froth, Chimpy, froth.
Dance, Chimpy, dance!
<snicker>
/\ Properly known as Bill
\ /\ The Monster You Kooks Can't Handle
\ / \ THERE IS NO CABAL - LONG LIVE THE NEW CABAL
\/ The AUK coup is complete. The Old Cabal is no more.
Accept no substitutes...
if it's from Databasix, it's a sure bet it's from a kook.
databasix.com / PacketDerm, LLC / COTSE:
all branches of the same malignant tree.
Message-ID: <l7m8ig$1ld$7@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8jh$1le$8@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8lh$1le$9@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8ne$1ld$8@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8pc$1le$10@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8rb$1ld$9@news.mixmin.net>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-31 10:56 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <iklqfb5sk078oq6o4u39p44e19ea951bl2@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #655681 |
On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 18:35:48 +0200 (CEST), Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > >Jim "Jism Junkie Gerbil Cannon" Gorman (aka Chimpy the Coin-Slot >Operated SuckMonkey, aka Checkmate The PickleTickler), socked up as >Mustaffa Sheboygan, in ><news:MPG.31664e451bf90a0798cc3d@news.altopia.com> did thusly jump >head first into the wood chipper again: > >> In article <c992c74cc05996f4d790f3085ffa4cd7@dizum.com>, >> Chimpy's Usenet Lord and Master >> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> says... > >>> Now let's consider the photographic evidence... > >> Already done... you stole a picture of someone else's REAL Lotus, >> reversed the image, and claimed it was yours. You're guilty of Petty >> Theft Auto Image, and acting all petty in public. Now flounce for us! And a flouncing he went.......Bwahahaha > >Chimpy's an ignorant gay lying faggot slut. And he's starting his next >meltdown. LOL > >Why can't you deny your own faggoty words, Chimpy? Why can't you >refute the truthiness in my .sig, Chimpy? > ><snicker> > >Chimpy has insisted for *years* that a vagina was actually "a man's >gaping asshole and a pair of balls" (Chimpy's words) because he's *so* >gay that even when he looks straight at a vagina, all he sees is "a >man's gaping asshole and a pair of balls" (Chimpy's words). That's >because Chimpy *is* the "throbbing pulse of faggotry" (Chimpy's >words). That's why Chimpy responds to the name "Ignorant Gay Lying >Faggot Slut". LOL > >Chimpy had the goatse image in his fapfolder, so when I posted that >picture of a gaping vagina in reference to his story about "the one >who got away" thinking that a ragged-out crack whore would be the >*best* Chimpy could hope to attract, Chimpy immediately launched into >a years-long rant about his "lost love" being the goatse image. > >How else would Chimpy know that the "lost love" image was an altered >version of the goatse image to show a vagina rather than male dangly >bits, and why would he insist for *years* that his "lost love" >actually had male dangly bits? LOL! > >A paraphrasing of what Chimpy was essentially ranting for *years*: >"Nuhhh-uhhhh! That image is supposed to be the goatse image! I should >know, I have it in my fapfolder and it was *my* "lost love"! You will >immediately change the image of my lost love back to having a "man's >gaping asshole", "gaping asshole and balls", "giant ball-like labia" >and "a nut sack swinging" or I'll stamp my high heels and hit you with >my purse!" LOL! > >Take, for instance, this emoticon: :( > >And now I'll change it to: :-) > >But Chimpy will insist it's still a noseless sad-face emoticon because >he was caught insisting that the picture of his "lost love" was >actually the goatse image and that his "lost love" actually had a >"man's gaping asshole" (Chimpy's words), "gaping asshole and balls" >(Chimpy's words), "giant ball-like labia" (Chimpy's words) and "a nut >sack swinging" (Chimpy's words)... he has no other choice but to >insist that every altered image is still the original and therefore >that his "lost love" *was* a man as he's insisted for years... which >makes him the "throbbing pulse of faggotry" (Chimpy's words) LOL > >Message-ID: <31e4747ee7179064b1fdd5266cd08d72@dizum.com> >================================================================ >She's the fish that got away, all because Chimpy didn't have $5 or a >rock of crack as payment. She was... > / \ \ / \ > | | | | > | ' `. ASSHOLE | : > \ | | \| | > \ | / v \\ : > /\ \/ _-- __| \ | > / \ \_-~ / (*) \ ~-\ | > | \_ \ _/-------\.____,_\| | > \ \ \_,____// _ ___ _ (____> / | > \,___\ < ___) ______ (_____> / > ^ /\ | < ____)/ \(_____> |_/\ > | / /\| <_____) | (___> / \ > BOOB | ( _<____)\_______/ /// _/ / \ > | \ \_ \\\_________/// (__/ \ > | \ \___) \`--\\_//--'/ /| > | \ / \ / | > | \_ / ^ \ _/ | > | / | \ | > | / / VAGINA \ | > | / / \ | > | / | | > | | | | >....that big. But unlike fishermen's tales of "the one that got away", >this one doesn't get bigger with time, only smaller. >================================================================ >Note the labeling so Chimpy can find his way around unfamiliar >territory. LOL! > >Come to find out, Chimpy's "lost love" was a result of a hard drive >crash. LOL! > >=============================================================== >Message-ID: <4af9faf781574d85240bcd2d06d7a9db@dizum.com> >Message-ID: <cc6ce0e71e2718523441a614bc8d9f84@dizum.com> >Message-ID: <69b99d078b48ab360354cf8167ef141d@dizum.com> > >Checkmate wrote of his "unhappy childhood experiences" (Chimpy's >words) of receiving "belly-rubbing faggoty bum-stuffing" (Chimpy's >words) from his "belly-rubbing, bum-stuffing drunkard daddy" (Chimpy's >words), and what his "belly-rubbing horndog homodaddy" (Chimpy's >words) "did to his asshole... like turn it inside-out" (Chimpy's >words), an experience that was like "trying to stuff the toothpaste >back into the tube" (Chimpy's words) which caused him to become the >"poor pathetic bum-stuffed son of a drunken faggot" (Chimpy's words) >who propositions guys with lines like "I'd like to tickle his ass" >(Chimpy's words), "My penis will spit in your face." (Chimpy's words) >and "He could do us both at the same time." (Chimpy's words). > >One must wonder if his father realizes "the monster he created when he >was butt-fucking his own son?" (Chimpy's words) because "this isn't >something a normal person dreams up" (Chimpy's words), "this is >something that obviously happened" (Chimpy's words), because "nobody >plucks those kind of details out of thin air" (Chimpy's words), so it >had to be his "own personal experience" (Chimpy's words). >=============================================================== > >But that was just the beginning, poor Chimpy gives off such a gay vibe >that he is molested everywhere he goes: >Message-ID: <d0a42c55ff9c918eaab1241d3c4cec3e@dizum.com> >=============================================================== >> I think what it means, is that you don't need to worry about waking up >> from the anesthesia with your pants around your ankles, laying face-down >> in the dental chair, with the dentist telling you you can spit now. >=============================================================== > >Let's add some emphasis to better suss the meaning of Chimpy's words: >=============================================================== >> I think what it means, is that *you* don't need to "worry" about waking up >> from the anesthesia with *your* pants around *your* ankles, laying face-down >> in the dental chair, with the dentist telling you *you* can spit now. >=============================================================== > >But apparently Chimpy's *so* gay he does need to "worry" (read: hope) >that he wakes up in that condition. LOL > >So in short, Chimpy is a real-world Mr. Garrison from South Park. He >drives around in his little pooftercar honking his bulb-horn and >shouting "I am NOT gaaaaaay! I dare any man to pound my ass to prove >iiiiit! I guarantee I'll pretend to not like it no matter how hard you >pounnnnnd.". > >Melt, Chimpy, melt. >Froth, Chimpy, froth. >Dance, Chimpy, dance! >Muahahaha, etc. > >You ignorant gay lying faggot slut. > ><snicker>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-31 13:04 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <op.ye68dstdtm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #655686 |
On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 12:56:18 -0400, Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 18:35:48 +0200 (CEST), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>
>> Jim "Jism Junkie Gerbil Cannon" Gorman (aka Chimpy the Coin-Slot
>> Operated SuckMonkey, aka Checkmate The PickleTickler), socked up as
>> Mustaffa Sheboygan, in
>> <news:MPG.31664e451bf90a0798cc3d@news.altopia.com> did thusly jump
>> head first into the wood chipper again:
>>
>>> In article <c992c74cc05996f4d790f3085ffa4cd7@dizum.com>,
>>> Chimpy's Usenet Lord and Master
>>> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> says...
>>
>>>> Now let's consider the photographic evidence...
>>
>>> Already done... you stole a picture of someone else's REAL Lotus,
>>> reversed the image, and claimed it was yours. You're guilty of Petty
>>> Theft Auto Image, and acting all petty in public. Now flounce for us!
>
>
> And a flouncing he went.......Bwahahaha
that tutu of his goes nicely with his size 10 steel tipped stilettos.
>>
>> Chimpy's an ignorant gay lying faggot slut. And he's starting his next
>> meltdown. LOL
>>
>> Why can't you deny your own faggoty words, Chimpy? Why can't you
>> refute the truthiness in my .sig, Chimpy?
>>
>> <snicker>
>>
>> Chimpy has insisted for *years* that a vagina was actually "a man's
>> gaping asshole and a pair of balls" (Chimpy's words) because he's *so*
>> gay that even when he looks straight at a vagina, all he sees is "a
>> man's gaping asshole and a pair of balls" (Chimpy's words). That's
>> because Chimpy *is* the "throbbing pulse of faggotry" (Chimpy's
>> words). That's why Chimpy responds to the name "Ignorant Gay Lying
>> Faggot Slut". LOL
>>
>> Chimpy had the goatse image in his fapfolder, so when I posted that
>> picture of a gaping vagina in reference to his story about "the one
>> who got away" thinking that a ragged-out crack whore would be the
>> *best* Chimpy could hope to attract, Chimpy immediately launched into
>> a years-long rant about his "lost love" being the goatse image.
>>
>> How else would Chimpy know that the "lost love" image was an altered
>> version of the goatse image to show a vagina rather than male dangly
>> bits, and why would he insist for *years* that his "lost love"
>> actually had male dangly bits? LOL!
>>
>> A paraphrasing of what Chimpy was essentially ranting for *years*:
>> "Nuhhh-uhhhh! That image is supposed to be the goatse image! I should
>> know, I have it in my fapfolder and it was *my* "lost love"! You will
>> immediately change the image of my lost love back to having a "man's
>> gaping asshole", "gaping asshole and balls", "giant ball-like labia"
>> and "a nut sack swinging" or I'll stamp my high heels and hit you with
>> my purse!" LOL!
>>
>> Take, for instance, this emoticon: :(
>>
>> And now I'll change it to: :-)
>>
>> But Chimpy will insist it's still a noseless sad-face emoticon because
>> he was caught insisting that the picture of his "lost love" was
>> actually the goatse image and that his "lost love" actually had a
>> "man's gaping asshole" (Chimpy's words), "gaping asshole and balls"
>> (Chimpy's words), "giant ball-like labia" (Chimpy's words) and "a nut
>> sack swinging" (Chimpy's words)... he has no other choice but to
>> insist that every altered image is still the original and therefore
>> that his "lost love" *was* a man as he's insisted for years... which
>> makes him the "throbbing pulse of faggotry" (Chimpy's words) LOL
>>
>> Message-ID: <31e4747ee7179064b1fdd5266cd08d72@dizum.com>
>> ================================================================
>> She's the fish that got away, all because Chimpy didn't have $5 or a
>> rock of crack as payment. She was...
>> / \ \ / \
>> | | | |
>> | ' `. ASSHOLE | :
>> \ | | \| |
>> \ | / v \\ :
>> /\ \/ _-- __| \ |
>> / \ \_-~ / (*) \ ~-\ |
>> | \_ \ _/-------\.____,_\| |
>> \ \ \_,____// _ ___ _ (____> / |
>> \,___\ < ___) ______ (_____> /
>> ^ /\ | < ____)/ \(_____> |_/\
>> | / /\| <_____) fakey | (___> / \
>> BOOB | ( _<____)\_______/ /// _/ / \
>> | \ \_ \\\_________/// (__/ \
>> | \ \___) \`--\\_//--'/ /|
>> | \ / \ / |
>> | \_ / ^ \ _/ |
>> | / | \ |
>> | / / VAGINA \ |
>> | / / \ |
>> | / | |
>> | | | |
>> ....that big. But unlike fishermen's tales of "the one that got away",
>> this one doesn't get bigger with time, only smaller.
>> ================================================================
>> Note the labeling so Chimpy can find his way around unfamiliar
>> territory. LOL!
>>
>> Come to find out, Chimpy's "lost love" was a result of a hard drive
>> crash. LOL!
>>
>> ===============================================================
>> Message-ID: <4af9faf781574d85240bcd2d06d7a9db@dizum.com>
>> Message-ID: <cc6ce0e71e2718523441a614bc8d9f84@dizum.com>
>> Message-ID: <69b99d078b48ab360354cf8167ef141d@dizum.com>
>>
>> Checkmate wrote of his "unhappy childhood experiences" (Chimpy's
>> words) of receiving "belly-rubbing faggoty bum-stuffing" (Chimpy's
>> words) from his "belly-rubbing, bum-stuffing drunkard daddy" (Chimpy's
>> words), and what his "belly-rubbing horndog homodaddy" (Chimpy's
>> words) "did to his asshole... like turn it inside-out" (Chimpy's
>> words), an experience that was like "trying to stuff the toothpaste
>> back into the tube" (Chimpy's words) which caused him to become the
>> "poor pathetic bum-stuffed son of a drunken faggot" (Chimpy's words)
>> who propositions guys with lines like "I'd like to tickle his ass"
>> (Chimpy's words), "My penis will spit in your face." (Chimpy's words)
>> and "He could do us both at the same time." (Chimpy's words).
>>
>> One must wonder if his father realizes "the monster he created when he
>> was butt-fucking his own son?" (Chimpy's words) because "this isn't
>> something a normal person dreams up" (Chimpy's words), "this is
>> something that obviously happened" (Chimpy's words), because "nobody
>> plucks those kind of details out of thin air" (Chimpy's words), so it
>> had to be his "own personal experience" (Chimpy's words).
>> ===============================================================
>>
>> But that was just the beginning, poor Chimpy gives off such a gay vibe
>> that he is molested everywhere he goes:
>> Message-ID: <d0a42c55ff9c918eaab1241d3c4cec3e@dizum.com>
>> ===============================================================
>>> I think what it means, is that you don't need to worry about waking up
>>> from the anesthesia with your pants around your ankles, laying
>>> face-down
>>> in the dental chair, with the dentist telling you you can spit now.
>> ===============================================================
>>
>> Let's add some emphasis to better suss the meaning of Chimpy's words:
>> ===============================================================
>>> I think what it means, is that *you* don't need to "worry" about
>>> waking up
>>> from the anesthesia with *your* pants around *your* ankles, laying
>>> face-down
>>> in the dental chair, with the dentist telling you *you* can spit now.
>> ===============================================================
>>
>> But apparently Chimpy's *so* gay he does need to "worry" (read: hope)
>> that he wakes up in that condition. LOL
>>
>> So in short, Chimpy is a real-world Mr. Garrison from South Park. He
>> drives around in his little pooftercar honking his bulb-horn and
>> shouting "I am NOT gaaaaaay! I dare any man to pound my ass to prove
>> iiiiit! I guarantee I'll pretend to not like it no matter how hard you
>> pounnnnnd.".
>>
>> Melt, Chimpy, melt.
>> Froth, Chimpy, froth.
>> Dance, Chimpy, dance!
>> Muahahaha, etc.
>>
>> You ignorant gay lying faggot slut.
>>
>> <snickerTurd>
--
the never-ending saga of fakey's "lotus"...
https://web.archive.org/web/20160324102816/http://i.imgur.com/S1Xr5PO.png
-
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu
-
FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>
">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)
Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking
*moron*?
"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""
it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. it says that you're in denial
about the inversion of your AC legs.
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png
http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf
on page 2:
** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)
*COUGH*
SPNAK!!
-
i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII
art if you ask nicely.</GROUCHO MARX>
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>
-
snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:
- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:
http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html
place those files in a directory and save this file as
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.
compiles with:
gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++
run with:
./a.out
enjoy the LULZ ;)
*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>
using namespace std;
int main(){
//float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
//float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);
float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
float_precision t=float_precision(0); // time variable
float_precision sum=float_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's
ridiculous sinewave mess
float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25); //
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
float_precision PI;
PI =_float_table(_PI,25);
// this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
while(sum < snickerPrediction){
// fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
+
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));
// perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh
snickerTurds
if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
}
t = t+STEP;
}
/*
Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"
Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves
never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same time.
That's how stupid you are.
Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"
Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when
summed.
the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages that are archived FOREVER.
*/
cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
-
Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>
-
Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
<snicker>
Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
<the band strikes up a rousing version of "on top of old smokey">
on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*
*hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.
-
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg
http://cafepress.com/kooktown
http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg
-
If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)
if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2
-
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd
-
Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:
$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
You> Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot> Fag!
(just as useful as the original!)
-
snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden
service. It's not rocket science.
_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a
kiddie pr0n network.)
That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."
-
Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-31 04:17 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <99upfbdv7r2ug58a2gdtsesc5hp6cumjbu@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #655600 |
On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 05:45:02 +0200 (CEST), Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > his parent's >driveway is longer than that, with no trees at the end and stalker boi knows this how?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-29 07:25 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <d614268300a6c5af82fbdd9a565bb6d8@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #654505 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> James Bernard 'Tardnado' McGinn, Jr. of Antioch, CA, socked up as Solving Tornadoes, in <news:4318ff9a-9c4d-4f20-84cd-5dc418054025@googlegroups.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 11:02:47 PM UTC-7, > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >>> Obviously not. >> That's right. It's obvious that you're fooling no one. >> >> You claim Coulomb's Law states the exact opposite of what it actually >> states > You are delibately misrepresenting my words. I'm not. In fact, when you were called on your dishonest attempt to twist Coulomb's Law to state exactly the opposite of what it actually states so you could fit it to your delusion, you invented an entirely new "mechanism" of electrostatic attraction which works opposite to Coulomb's Law... but you've thus far failed to provide any proof of your claim, nor have you addressed the fact that if your moronic "mechanism" existed, it and the electrostatic attraction in accord with Coulomb's Law would mutually cancel, thus causing all water to instantly dissociate. Because you're a scientific fraud pulling retarded suppositions straight from your ass and pretending like you've discovered something new. You're not. You're just an insane loser. You'll never be taken seriously in the scientific comunity, James. You're a fraud and a liar. > Why the desperation? You're projecting, James. > Is my theory that good? No, James, your theory is nothing more than the delusional ranting of a broken schizo-brained uneducated halfwit. But watching you spiral into insanity is cheap entertainment. This doesn't end until you've done so, or acknowledged reality and apologized to the scientific community for your attempts to twist their hard work to fit your delusions. Your sanity is cracking under the weight of all those unanswered questions, James. I told you, the longer you run from reality, the worse it'll get for you... and we've only just begun. Why have you been legally deemed to be mentally incompetent and a lifelong ward of your parents James, Sr. and Constance, necessitating that you live with your parents because you'd be a danger to yourself if you lived independently, James? Is it your paranoid schizophrenia? Is that why your mommy has to feed you, dress you, wipe your ass and help you to not piss all over yourself? And you call yourself a scientist, James? You're nothing more than a pathetic basement-dwelling schizo-brained delusional loser. How does a hot air balloon work, James? No plasma, no giant sentient tornado monster in the jet stream... how does it rise, Jim? Why can't you explain that, James? Why can't you provide the explanation and mathematics to prove your claim that humid air is heavier than dry air, James? Why can't you explain or mathematically model even *one* of your delusions, James? Why can't you get your delusions through the peer-review process, James? Why are there *no* corroborating studies backing up your delusions, James? Why is your blather on the comments sections of websites being *deleted*, dismissed as the mad barking of a loon, James? Why are you described in the reviews of the "books" you've written as "delusional", "insane", and a "conspiracy theorist", James? Why did you *fail* *out* of an elective Basic Meteorology class, in which they teach the very concepts you're blathering out your lack of education about now, James? Why do you so hate meteorologists, James? Is it because you failed out of the elective Basic Meteorology class because you've legally been deemed mentally incompetent, James? Why do you use your failing out of an elective Basic Meteorology class as the basis to claim yourself to be a "physicist not-a-physicist", James? Do you not understand that physicists are highly educated, whereas you're ignorant and uneducated? What universities did you attend, what were your majors and what was the topic of your Ph.D. thesis, James? Why are you not taking your meds, James? Why are you *still* running away from answering those tough questions in my .sig which highlight the logical inconsistencies and contradictions in your moronic "theory not-a-theory", James? -- Here, James, at the very least, try to address those tough questions which spotlight the logical inconsistencies and contradictions inherent in your "theory": ============================================================ Anders Nilsson measured (https://youtu.be/7hGqlEpvODw?t=2156) a spectral peak that was not solid-phase nor liquid-phase water, James. You claim that water remains liquid-phase upon evaporation. What was Anders Nilsson measuring, James? Oh, that's right... gaseous phase water, thereby proving that evaporation entails a phase change, thereby proving latent heat of evaporation exists, thereby *dis*proving a gigantic chunk of your theory, James. You make a supposition that a "plasma not-a-plasma" is created from water due to wind shear, which transports energy throughout the atmosphere via wind driven by that plasma. Where does the energy come from to create your "wind shear" to create your "plasma not-a-plasma" if the "plasma not-a-plasma" cannot exist and thereby "transport energy" by driving that wind to create the "wind shear" which creates your "plasma not-a-plasma", unless there is "wind shear" to begin with, James? Your logic is so twisted you're going in circles. You've created a circulus in probando causality dilemma, which utterly destroys your theory, James. According to your "theory", electrostatic attraction *increases* with distance (in violation of Coulomb's Law), which means that when an electron falls in orbit, it has to *absorb* energy. And that higher energy level somehow translates into a *weaker* electrostatic attraction. Now let's look at the other side of the coin... the electron in orbit would give off energy, rise in orbit, and somehow, that *lower* energy level translates into a *stronger* electrostatic attraction... how's *that* work, James? Explain how you've not just violated the Law of Conservation of Energy on an atomic level. How do your "jet stream vortices" travel potentially hundreds of miles away from your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky", without detection by satellite *or* Doppler radar, and know where and when to touch down so they always hit only cumulonimbus clouds, rather than tornadoes randomly appearing out of the clear blue sky or from other types of clouds, James? Is your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky" sentient, James? Go on, Jim, tell us... *why* is there a "boundary" between the troposphere and the stratosphere... we're waiting, Jim... No answer, Jim? Is it because that's where your "sentient jet stream / giant tornado monster with noodly appendages" lives, and it likes it that way, Jim? Do you need your meds, Jim? If, as you claim, the jet stream is a vortex, why is the ride while inside the jet stream so smooth, James? Have you never ridden in an airplane inside a jet stream, James? Is it just that your "sentient jet stream / giant tornado monster with noodly appendages" likes its back scratched by the aircraft, so it doesn't rip the aircraft to shreds, Jim? Do you not understand that once the air going upward through the tornadic funnel reaches the cumulonimbus cloud base above the mesocyclone, it spreads out, thus the tornado is strictly a phenomenon which happens from cloud base to ground? It does *not* go from the ground all the way up through the cloud to the tropopause as you claim, James, and it most certainly does not continue for potentially hundreds of miles in the upper troposphere to join the jet stream, which would make air travel deadly. Explain why the jets run easterly, whereas the dry line runs N-S, if the jets are powering the creation of tornadoes. How is a tornado being created hundreds of miles from the edge of the jets, James? Which direction does air flow from a flame, Jim? Up, does it not? That's convection due to temperature-induced density differential, is it not? Which direction does air flow from a flame in zero gravity, James? Radially in all directions, thereby snuffing out the flame due to lack of oxygen. So your claiming that convection doesn't exist means you're further claiming that gravity does not exist, and fire cannot burn for very long before it is smothered due to lack of oxygen. Or were you not aware that convection is a gravity-induced phenomenon due to density differential, James? How does a hot air balloon rise, Jim? That's due to air density differential due to temperature differential, is it not? That less-dense air is convecting upward. Do you deny this, Jim? Is your giant sentient sky tornado monster stretching one of its noodly appendages down and gently lifting the hot air balloon, Jim? How are your atmospheric "water droplets" forming if they're plasma, Jim? Do you not know what the definition of "plasma" is, James? How is your "plasma not-a-plasma" (which you have admitted is a hypothetical construct in a failed attempt to lend your claims even a semblance of plausibility) forming if the nuclear binding energy and dissociation energy of water are identical, and thus the water will preferentially dissociate into hydrogen and oxygen unless hit with an extremely energetic laser, Jim? Where is the energy (equivalent to photons of 103.32 nm wavelength, extremely strong ultraviolet, just 3.32 nm away from x-rays... except photons with shorter wavelength than 121 nm are absorbed high above the troposphere because they ionize air so well) coming from in the troposphere to form your "plasma not-a-plasma", Jim? How is the energy to plasmize your "plasma not-a-plasma" not dissociating all water on the planet and killing all life on the planet given that the energy *must* be in the troposphere where nearly all the water is, and where all life is, Jim? Now that it's been proven that water molecule polarity doesn't change upon H bonding (which would have side effects such as random changes in the solvent properties of water... and we know those properties do not randomly change, Jim), and in fact the two spin isomers of water molecules account for the different H bonding strengths which account for evaporation and condensation, do you still contend that your implausible claims are workable, Jim? ============================================================ Why can't you answer those questions, Jim?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-29 19:21 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ebb326a17ef291cda0c2d8971322681e@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #655340 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> James 'Tardnado' McGinn, in <news:e326f716-9441-4866-b875-e3a23abb28a3@googlegroups.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Monday, March 28, 2016 at 10:36:38 PM UTC-7, > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >> James Bernard 'Tardnado' McGinn, Jr. of Antioch, CA, socked up as >> Solving Tornadoes, in >> <news:4318ff9a-9c4d-4f20-84cd-5dc418054025@googlegroups.com> did >> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: >>> On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 11:02:47 PM UTC-7, >>> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >>>>> Obviously not. >>>> That's right. It's obvious that you're fooling no one. >>>> >>>> You claim Coulomb's Law states the exact opposite of what it actually >>>> states >>> You are delibately misrepresenting my words. >> I'm not. In fact, when you were called on your dishonest attempt to >> twist Coulomb's Law to state exactly the opposite of what it actually >> states so you could fit it to your delusion, you invented an entirely >> new "mechanism" of electrostatic attraction which works opposite to >> Coulomb's Law... > You Did your mommy drink like an Irishman when she was pregnant with you, James? Is that what fucked up your brain? Or did she pass on her wicked case of Irish syphilis to you and they didn't catch it until it'd eaten half your brain? Or was your congenital birth defect in the form of severe mental retardation the result of the usual Irish incest? LOL You fucking boob, you're a joke, a laughingstock. Your name has now become a verb in scientific circles describing scientific fraud. LOL "The IPCC sure McGinn'd that temperature data. It's obvious they changed it again. What retard thought he could get away with that?" I did that to you, James. Yer welcome. <snicker> > still are dishonestly paraphrasing my words instead of quoting me > directly. You seem to have no understanding of intellectual honestly. That's rich, coming from the broken-brained retard trying to twist scientific concepts to fit his delusion, which he's forced to shift around as he slaps patches on it to cover up those gaping logic holes, only to expose even more holes. > You don't get it. > > You are a child. You're a mentally ill halfwit with a broken schizo-brain and a penchant for lying, James. You're a scientific fraud and a worldwide laughingstock. You're the pathetic clown too stupid to understand reality. You're the crayon-scribbling mushbrain who's going to "class-action" kooksoot *science*, *reality*, *electrons*, *photons* and the *universe* for their part in that giant conspiracy to thwart your attempts to remodel reality to fit your delusions. Where's that kooksoot, James? Did you wear your crayons to a nub, and mommy won't buy you any more? LOL You sad pathetic brain-damaged little halfwit. If you had half the sense that God gave a fucking garden slug, you'd be embarrassed for yourself... if you had half the sense that God gave a fucking garden slug. Why can't you answer those questions, James? -- Here, James, at the very least, try to address those tough questions which spotlight the logical inconsistencies and contradictions inherent in your "theory": ============================================================ Why are you known as Tardnado McGinn, the delusional moronic ignorant uneducated psychotic babbling loon, James? Why have you been legally deemed to be mentally incompetent and a lifelong ward of your parents James, Sr. and Constance, necessitating that you live with your parents because you'd be a danger to yourself if you lived independently, James? Is it your paranoid schizophrenia? Is that why your mommy has to feed you, dress you, wipe your ass and help you to not piss all over yourself? And you call yourself a scientist, James? You're nothing more than a pathetic basement-dwelling schizo-brained delusional loser. Anders Nilsson measured (https://youtu.be/7hGqlEpvODw?t=2156) a spectral peak that was not solid-phase nor liquid-phase water, James. You claim that water remains liquid-phase upon evaporation. What was Anders Nilsson measuring, James? Oh, that's right... gaseous phase water, thereby proving that evaporation entails a phase change, thereby proving latent heat of evaporation exists, thereby *dis*proving a gigantic chunk of your theory, James. You make a supposition that a "plasma not-a-plasma" is created from water due to wind shear, which transports energy throughout the atmosphere via wind driven by that plasma. Where does the energy come from to create your "wind shear" to create your "plasma not-a-plasma" if the "plasma not-a-plasma" cannot exist and thereby "transport energy" by driving that wind to create the "wind shear" which creates your "plasma not-a-plasma", unless there is "wind shear" to begin with, James? Your logic is so twisted you're going in circles. You've created a circulus in probando causality dilemma, which utterly destroys your theory, James. According to your "theory", electrostatic attraction *increases* with distance (in violation of Coulomb's Law), which means that when an electron falls in orbit, it has to *absorb* energy. And that higher energy level somehow translates into a *weaker* electrostatic attraction. Now let's look at the other side of the coin... the electron in orbit would give off energy, rise in orbit, and somehow, that *lower* energy level translates into a *stronger* electrostatic attraction... how's *that* work, James? Explain how you've not just violated the Law of Conservation of Energy on an atomic level. You've yet again slapped a patch on your theory, abandoning Coulomb's Law for a separate "mechanism" by which electrstatic attraction increases with increasing distance. How does your "mechanism" and electrostatic attraction in accordance with Coulomb's Law not mutually cancel, thereby dissociating all water, James? How do your "jet stream vortices" travel potentially hundreds of miles away from your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky", without detection by satellite *or* Doppler radar, and know where and when to touch down so they always hit only cumulonimbus clouds, rather than tornadoes randomly appearing out of the clear blue sky or from other types of clouds, James? Is your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky" sentient, James? Go on, Jim, tell us... *why* is there a "boundary" between the troposphere and the stratosphere... we're waiting, Jim... No answer, Jim? Is it because that's where your "sentient jet stream / giant tornado monster with noodly appendages" lives, and it likes it that way, Jim? Do you need your meds, Jim? How does a hot air balloon work, James? No plasma, no giant sentient tornado monster in the jet stream... how does it rise, Jim? Why can't you explain that, James? Why does water freeze from the top down, even if the heat sink is *below* the container of water? That's another question your "theory not-a-theory" can't answer. Why can't you provide the explanation and mathematics to prove your claim that humid air is heavier than dry air, James? Why can't you explain or mathematically model even *one* of your delusions, James? Why can't you get your delusions through the peer-review process, James? Why can't you even get your delusion on a pre-print server, James? Why are there *no* corroborating studies backing up your delusions, James? Why are you shunned by the scientific community, James? Why is your blather on the comments sections of websites being *deleted*, dismissed as the mad barking of a loon, James? Why are you described in the reviews of the "books" you've written as "delusional", "insane", and a "conspiracy theorist", James? Why did you *fail* *out* of an elective Basic Meteorology class, in which they teach the very concepts you're blathering out your lack of education about now, James? Why do you so hate meteorologists, James? Is it because you failed out of the elective Basic Meteorology class because you've legally been deemed mentally incompetent, James? Why do you use your failing out of an elective Basic Meteorology class as the basis to claim yourself to be a "physicist not-a-physicist", James? Do you not understand that physicists are highly educated, whereas you're ignorant and uneducated? What universities did you attend, what were your majors and what was the topic of your Ph.D. thesis, James? You don't have a Ph.D? Then you're not a physicist, James. LOL If, as you claim, the jet stream is a vortex, why is the ride while inside the jet stream so smooth, James? Have you never ridden in an airplane inside a jet stream, James? Is it just that your "sentient jet stream / giant tornado monster with noodly appendages" likes its back scratched by the aircraft, so it doesn't rip the aircraft to shreds, Jim? Do you not understand that once the air going upward through the tornadic funnel reaches the cumulonimbus cloud base above the mesocyclone, it spreads out, thus the tornado is strictly a phenomenon which happens from cloud base to ground? It does *not* go from the ground all the way up through the cloud to the tropopause as you claim, James, and it most certainly does not continue for potentially thousands of miles in the upper troposphere to join the jet stream, which would make air travel deadly. Explain why the jets run easterly, whereas the dry line runs N-S, if the jets are powering the creation of tornadoes. How is a tornado being created hundreds of miles from the edge of the jets, James? Which direction does air flow from a flame, Jim? Up, does it not? That's convection due to temperature-induced density differential, is it not? Which direction does air flow from a flame in zero gravity, James? Radially in all directions, thereby snuffing out the flame due to lack of oxygen. So your claiming that convection doesn't exist means you're further claiming that gravity does not exist, and fire cannot burn for very long before it is smothered due to lack of oxygen. Or were you not aware that convection is a gravity-induced phenomenon due to density differential, James? How are your atmospheric "water droplets" forming if they're plasma, Jim? Do you not know that water droplets *minimize* surface area, James? How are your "plasma not-a-plasma" "water droplets" *maximizing* their surface area as you claim? Do you not know what the definition of "plasma" is, James? How is your "plasma not-a-plasma" (which you have admitted is a hypothetical construct in a failed attempt to lend your claims even a semblance of plausibility) forming if the nuclear binding energy and dissociation energy of water are identical, and thus the water will preferentially dissociate into hydrogen and oxygen unless hit with an extremely energetic laser, Jim? Where is the energy (equivalent to photons of 103.32 nm wavelength, extremely strong ultraviolet, just 3.32 nm away from x-rays... except photons with shorter wavelength than 121 nm are absorbed high above the troposphere because they ionize air so well) coming from in the troposphere to form your "plasma not-a-plasma", Jim? How is the energy to plasmize your "plasma not-a-plasma" not dissociating all water on the planet and killing all life on the planet given that the energy *must* be in the troposphere where nearly all the water is, and where all life is, Jim? Now that it's been proven that water molecule polarity doesn't change upon H bonding (which would have side effects such as random changes in the solvent properties of water... and we know those properties do not randomly change, Jim), and in fact the two spin isomers of water molecules account for the different H bonding strengths which account for evaporation and condensation, do you still contend that your implausible claims are workable, Jim? Why are you not taking your meds, James? ============================================================ Why can't you answer those questions, Jim?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-07 08:11 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <f8b847e85b09dec98cda706d8088b7b7@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #655395 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> James 'Tardnado' McGinn, in <news:dd32b95f-7b28-4d09-a291-4d79345f1faf@googlegroups.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Tuesday, March 29, 2016 at 10:32:46 AM UTC-7, > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >> James 'Tardnado' McGinn, in >> <news:e326f716-9441-4866-b875-e3a23abb28a3@googlegroups.com> did >> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: >>> On Monday, March 28, 2016 at 10:36:38 PM UTC-7, >>> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >>>> James Bernard 'Tardnado' McGinn, Jr. of Antioch, CA, socked up as >>>> Solving Tornadoes, in >>>> <news:4318ff9a-9c4d-4f20-84cd-5dc418054025@googlegroups.com> did >>>> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: >>>>> On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 11:02:47 PM UTC-7, >>>>> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >>>>>>> Obviously not. >>>>>> That's right. It's obvious that you're fooling no one. >>>>>> >>>>>> You claim Coulomb's Law states the exact opposite of what it actually >>>>>> states >>>>> You are delibately misrepresenting my words. >>>> I'm not. In fact, when you were called on your dishonest attempt to >>>> twist Coulomb's Law to state exactly the opposite of what it actually >>>> states so you could fit it to your delusion, you invented an entirely >>>> new "mechanism" of electrostatic attraction which works opposite to >>>> Coulomb's Law... >>> You >> Did your mommy drink like an Irishman when she was pregnant with you, >> James? Is that what fucked up your brain? Or did she pass on her >> wicked case of Irish syphilis to you and they didn't catch it until >> it'd eaten half your brain? Or was your congenital birth defect in the >> form of severe mental retardation the result of the usual Irish >> incest? LOL >> >> You fucking boob, you're a joke, a laughingstock. Your name has now >> become a verb in scientific circles describing scientific fraud. LOL >> >> "The IPCC sure McGinn'd that temperature data. It's obvious they >> changed it again. What retard thought he could get away with that?" >> >> I did that to you, James. Yer welcome. >> >> <snicker> James? No reply, James? >>> still are dishonestly paraphrasing my words instead of quoting me >>> directly. You seem to have no understanding of intellectual honestly. >> That's rich, coming from the broken-brained retard trying to twist >> scientific concepts to fit his delusion, which he's forced to shift >> around as he slaps patches on it to cover up those gaping logic holes, >> only to expose even more holes. James? No reply, James? >>> You don't get it. >>> >>> You are a child. >> You're a mentally ill halfwit with a broken schizo-brain and a >> penchant for lying, James. You're a scientific fraud and a worldwide >> laughingstock. You're the pathetic clown too stupid to understand >> reality. You're the crayon-scribbling mushbrain who's going to >> "class-action" kooksoot *science*, *reality*, *electrons*, *photons* >> and the *universe* for their part in that giant conspiracy to thwart >> your attempts to remodel reality to fit your delusions. >> >> Where's that kooksoot, James? Did you wear your crayons to a nub, and >> mommy won't buy you any more? LOL >> >> You sad pathetic brain-damaged little halfwit. If you had half the >> sense that God gave a fucking garden slug, you'd be embarrassed for >> yourself... if you had half the sense that God gave a fucking garden >> slug. James? No reply, James? > Do you now concede that my model harbors no contradiction with > Coulomb's Law? Yes? No? Your "model not-a-model" is in direct contradiction to Coulomb's Law and reality, James. You tried to twist Coulomb's Law to state the exact opposite of what it actually states, and when called on it, you gave up on that and pulled a whole new "mechanism not-a-mechanism" straight from your ass that acted opposite to Coulomb's Law, not realizing that the two would mutually cancel and dissociate all water immediately... because you're James Bernard 'Tardnado' McGinn, Jr. of Antioch, CA, the broken-brained uneducated moronic halfwit who is too insane to recognize reality, let alone acknowledge it, let alone model it. That's why you've had to live your entire life in mommy and daddy's basement, James... you'd be a danger to yourself and others if you lived independently. You'd chimp out like Rainman on bath salts and make the nightly news. Of course, you're headed that way anyway. You're the only one who doesn't see that reality, James. Then after an extended stay in the Home For The Criminally Insane, you'll be released to shamble from street corner to street corner, dirty and disheveled, with a ankle bracelet monitor, begging for spare change and muttering to no one in particular that you used to be a "physicist not-a-physicist", and cursing the letters 'e', 'F', 'N', 'V' and 'W', not necessarily in that order. Or you could submit to the Meteorology Cabal, James. You won't have a happy life, or much of a life at all, really, but for the odd jobs you do in service to the Meteorology Cabal, you'll have a roof over your head, such as it is. Remember, James, the Meteorology Cabal is always watching you. And also remember that we don't exist. This is all just a figment of your delusion. You've been pounding on your keyboard for no reason, cursing a ghost who haunts only you. Just take your meds, James. Then everything will be alright. You have no reason to suspect that they've been switched out for brainwashing drugs. Your own mother wouldn't do that to you. Right, James? James? Right, James? <snicker> -- Here, James, at the very least, try to address those tough questions which spotlight the logical inconsistencies and contradictions inherent in your "theory": ============================================================ Why are you known as Tardnado McGinn, the delusional moronic ignorant uneducated psychotic babbling loon, James? Why have you been legally deemed to be mentally incompetent and a lifelong ward of your parents James, Sr. and Constance, necessitating that you live with your parents because you'd be a danger to yourself if you lived independently, James? Is it your paranoid schizophrenia? Is that why your mommy has to feed you, dress you, wipe your ass and help you to not piss all over yourself? And you call yourself a scientist, James? You're nothing more than a pathetic basement-dwelling schizo-brained delusional loser. Anders Nilsson measured (https://youtu.be/7hGqlEpvODw?t=2156) a spectral peak that was not solid-phase nor liquid-phase water, James. You claim that water remains liquid-phase upon evaporation. What was Anders Nilsson measuring, James? Oh, that's right... gaseous phase water, thereby proving that evaporation entails a phase change, thereby proving latent heat of evaporation exists, thereby *dis*proving a gigantic chunk of your theory, James. You make a supposition that a "plasma not-a-plasma" is created from water due to wind shear, which transports energy throughout the atmosphere via wind driven by that plasma. Where does the energy come from to create your "wind shear" to create your "plasma not-a-plasma" if the "plasma not-a-plasma" cannot exist and thereby "transport energy" by driving that wind to create the "wind shear" which creates your "plasma not-a-plasma", unless there is "wind shear" to begin with, James? Your logic is so twisted you're going in circles. You've created a circulus in probando causality dilemma, which utterly destroys your theory, James. You've yet again slapped a patch on your theory, abandoning Coulomb's Law for a separate "mechanism" by which electrostatic attraction increases with increasing distance. How does your "mechanism" and electrostatic attraction in accordance with Coulomb's Law not mutually cancel, thereby dissociating all water, James? According to your "theory", electrostatic attraction *increases* with distance (in violation of Coulomb's Law), which means that when an electron falls in orbit, it has to *absorb* energy. And that higher energy level somehow translates into a *weaker* electrostatic attraction. Now let's look at the other side of the coin... the electron in orbit would give off energy, rise in orbit, and somehow, that *lower* energy level translates into a *stronger* electrostatic attraction... how's *that* work, James? Explain how you've not just violated the Law of Conservation of Energy on an atomic level. How do the polarity of the electron and the proton cancel if, as even you admit, there is a distance between them as a result of the Pauli Exclusion Principle and the repulsive van der Waals force, KookTard, and once they've cancelled, how is polarity reestablished, and how is that not dissociating the water? If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, why is the boiling point of water anomalously high as compared to other H-bonded hydrides, KookTard? If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, then water's cohesion would also drop. Why does it not do that, KookTard? If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, how is water *not* splitting up into hydroxide and hydronium ions, KookTard? If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, why does water have such a high latent heat of vaporization, a direct result of that same H bonding, KookTard? Of course, being the delusional uneducated moron that you are, you deny that water has any latent heat of vaporization... but you're *so* stupid that you didn't realize that your denial also means you deny that water has a gaseous phase, and that's just retarded. If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, why does water not become much more dense upon fully H bonding, KookTard? How do your "jet stream vortices" travel potentially hundreds of miles away from your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky", without detection by satellite *or* Doppler radar, and know where and when to touch down so they always hit only cumulonimbus clouds, rather than tornadoes randomly appearing out of the clear blue sky or from other types of clouds, James? Is your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky" sentient, James? Go on, Jim, tell us... *why* is there a "boundary" between the troposphere and the stratosphere... we're waiting, Jim... No answer, Jim? Is it because that's where your "sentient jet stream / giant tornado monster with noodly appendages" lives, and it likes it that way, Jim? Do you need your meds, Jim? How does a hot air balloon work, James? No plasma, no giant sentient tornado monster in the jet stream... how does it rise, Jim? Why can't you explain that, James? Why does water freeze from the top down, even if the heat sink is *below* the container of water? That's another question your "theory not-a-theory" can't answer. Why can't you provide the explanation and mathematics to prove your claim that humid air is heavier than dry air, James? Why can't you explain or mathematically model even *one* of your delusions, James? Why can't you get your delusions through the peer-review process, James? Why can't you even get your delusion on a pre-print server, James? Why are there *no* corroborating studies backing up your delusions, James? Why are you shunned by the scientific community, James? Why is your blather on the comments sections of websites being *deleted*, dismissed as the mad barking of a loon, James? Why are you described in the reviews of the "books" you've written as "delusional", "insane", and a "conspiracy theorist", James? Why did you *fail* *out* of an elective Basic Meteorology class, in which they teach the very concepts you're blathering out your lack of education about now, James? Why do you so hate meteorologists, James? Is it because you failed out of the elective Basic Meteorology class because you've legally been deemed mentally incompetent, James? Why do you use your failing out of an elective Basic Meteorology class as the basis to claim yourself to be a "physicist not-a-physicist", James? Do you not understand that physicists are highly educated, whereas you're ignorant and uneducated? What universities did you attend, what were your majors and what was the topic of your Ph.D. thesis, James? You don't have a Ph.D? Then you're not a physicist, James. LOL If, as you claim, the jet stream is a vortex, why is the ride while inside the jet stream so smooth, James? Have you never ridden in an airplane inside a jet stream, James? Is it just that your "sentient jet stream / giant tornado monster with noodly appendages" likes its back scratched by the aircraft, so it doesn't rip the aircraft to shreds, Jim? Do you not understand that once the air going upward through the tornadic funnel reaches the cumulonimbus cloud base above the mesocyclone, it spreads out, thus the tornado is strictly a phenomenon which happens from cloud base to ground? It does *not* go from the ground all the way up through the cloud to the tropopause as you claim, James, and it most certainly does not continue for potentially thousands of miles in the upper troposphere to join the jet stream, which would make air travel deadly. Explain why the jets run easterly, whereas the dry line runs N-S, if the jets are powering the creation of tornadoes. How is a tornado being created hundreds of miles from the edge of the jets, James? Which direction does air flow from a flame, Jim? Up, does it not? That's convection due to temperature-induced density differential, is it not? Which direction does air flow from a flame in zero gravity, James? Radially in all directions, thereby snuffing out the flame due to lack of oxygen. So your claiming that convection doesn't exist means you're further claiming that gravity does not exist, and fire cannot burn for very long before it is smothered due to lack of oxygen. Or were you not aware that convection is a gravity-induced phenomenon due to density differential, James? How are your atmospheric "water droplets" forming if they're plasma, Jim? Do you not know that water droplets *minimize* surface area, James? How are your "plasma not-a-plasma" "water droplets" *maximizing* their surface area as you claim? Do you not know what the definition of "plasma" is, James? How is your "plasma not-a-plasma" (which you have admitted is a hypothetical construct in a failed attempt to lend your claims even a semblance of plausibility) forming if the nuclear binding energy and dissociation energy of water are identical, and thus the water will preferentially dissociate into hydrogen and oxygen unless hit with an extremely energetic laser, Jim? Where is the energy (equivalent to photons of 103.32 nm wavelength, extremely strong ultraviolet, just 3.32 nm away from x-rays... except photons with shorter wavelength than 121 nm are absorbed high above the troposphere because they ionize air so well) coming from in the troposphere to form your "plasma not-a-plasma", Jim? How is the energy to plasmize your "plasma not-a-plasma" not dissociating all water on the planet and killing all life on the planet given that the energy *must* be in the troposphere where nearly all the water is, and where all life is, Jim? Now that it's been proven that water molecule polarity doesn't change upon H bonding (which would have side effects such as random changes in the solvent properties of water... and we know those properties do not randomly change, Jim), and in fact the two spin isomers of water molecules account for the different H bonding strengths which account for evaporation and condensation, do you still contend that your implausible claims are workable, Jim? Why are you not taking your meds, James? ============================================================ Why can't you answer those questions, Tardnado Jim?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-08 09:05 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <4f63a1e51f36684ba91e98455840786b@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #656766 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> James 'Tardnado' McGinn, in <news:fa5862fa-84f2-4167-b48d-b4686e94c271@googlegroups.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Wednesday, April 6, 2016 at 11:22:31 PM UTC-7, > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >>>>>>>>> Obviously not. >>>>>>>> That's right. It's obvious that you're fooling no one. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You claim Coulomb's Law states the exact opposite of what it actually >>>>>>>> states >>>>>>> You are delibately misrepresenting my words. >>>>>> I'm not. In fact, when you were called on your dishonest attempt to >>>>>> twist Coulomb's Law to state exactly the opposite of what it actually >>>>>> states so you could fit it to your delusion, you invented an entirely >>>>>> new "mechanism" of electrostatic attraction which works opposite to >>>>>> Coulomb's Law... >>>>> You >>>> Did your mommy drink like an Irishman when she was pregnant with you, >>>> James? Is that what fucked up your brain? Or did she pass on her >>>> wicked case of Irish syphilis to you and they didn't catch it until >>>> it'd eaten half your brain? Or was your congenital birth defect in the >>>> form of severe mental retardation the result of the usual Irish >>>> incest? LOL >>>> >>>> You fucking boob, you're a joke, a laughingstock. Your name has now >>>> become a verb in scientific circles describing scientific fraud. LOL >>>> >>>> "The IPCC sure McGinn'd that temperature data. It's obvious they >>>> changed it again. What retard thought he could get away with that?" >>>> >>>> I did that to you, James. Yer welcome. >>>> >>>> <snicker> >> James? No reply, James? >>>>> still are dishonestly paraphrasing my words instead of quoting me >>>>> directly. You seem to have no understanding of intellectual honestly. >>>> That's rich, coming from the broken-brained retard trying to twist >>>> scientific concepts to fit his delusion, which he's forced to shift >>>> around as he slaps patches on it to cover up those gaping logic holes, >>>> only to expose even more holes. >> James? No reply, James? >>>>> You don't get it. >>>>> >>>>> You are a child. >>>> You're a mentally ill halfwit with a broken schizo-brain and a >>>> penchant for lying, James. You're a scientific fraud and a worldwide >>>> laughingstock. You're the pathetic clown too stupid to understand >>>> reality. You're the crayon-scribbling mushbrain who's going to >>>> "class-action" kooksoot *science*, *reality*, *electrons*, *photons* >>>> and the *universe* for their part in that giant conspiracy to thwart >>>> your attempts to remodel reality to fit your delusions. >>>> >>>> Where's that kooksoot, James? Did you wear your crayons to a nub, and >>>> mommy won't buy you any more? LOL >>>> >>>> You sad pathetic brain-damaged little halfwit. If you had half the >>>> sense that God gave a fucking garden slug, you'd be embarrassed for >>>> yourself... if you had half the sense that God gave a fucking garden >>>> slug. >> James? No reply, James? >>> Do you now concede that my model harbors no contradiction with >>> Coulomb's Law? Yes? No? >> Your "model not-a-model" is in direct contradiction to Coulomb's Law >> and reality, James. You tried to twist Coulomb's Law to state the >> exact opposite of what it actually states, and when called on it, you >> gave up on that and pulled a whole new "mechanism not-a-mechanism" >> straight from your ass that acted opposite to Coulomb's Law, not >> realizing that the two would mutually cancel and dissociate all water >> immediately... because you're James Bernard 'Tardnado' McGinn, Jr. of >> Antioch, CA, the broken-brained uneducated moronic halfwit who is too >> insane to recognize reality, let alone acknowledge it, let alone model >> it. >> >> That's why you've had to live your entire life in mommy and daddy's >> basement, James... you'd be a danger to yourself and others if you >> lived independently. You'd chimp out like Rainman on bath salts and >> make the nightly news. >> >> Of course, you're headed that way anyway. You're the only one who >> doesn't see that reality, James. Then after an extended stay in the >> Home For The Criminally Insane, you'll be released to shamble from >> street corner to street corner, dirty and disheveled, with a ankle >> bracelet monitor, begging for spare change and muttering to no one in >> particular that you used to be a "physicist not-a-physicist", and >> cursing the letters 'e', 'F', 'N', 'V' and 'W', not necessarily in >> that order. >> >> Or you could submit to the Meteorology Cabal, James. You won't have a >> happy life, or much of a life at all, really, but for the odd jobs you >> do in service to the Meteorology Cabal, you'll have a roof over your >> head, such as it is. >> >> Remember, James, the Meteorology Cabal is always watching you. And >> also remember that we don't exist. This is all just a figment of your >> delusion. You've been pounding on your keyboard for no reason, cursing >> a ghost who haunts only you. >> >> Just take your meds, James. Then everything will be alright. You have >> no reason to suspect that they've been switched out for brainwashing >> drugs. Your own mother wouldn't do that to you. Right, James? >> >> James? >> >> Right, James? >> >> <snicker> >> >> -- >> >> How do the polarity of the electron and the proton cancel > With every post you become more incoherent. With every post you prove you're a delusional anti-science basement-dwelling moronic halfwit who was legally deemed to be mentally incompetent thus forcing you to live at home with mommy and daddy your entire life, James Bernard 'Tardnado' McGinn, Jr. Where's that "class-action" kooksoot, and who's going to be joining you to sue *science*, *reality*, *electrons*, *photons*, the *universe* and your FVNWe for conspiring to thwart your attempts at remodeling all of reality to fit your delusion, James? >> if, as even >> you admit, there is a distance between them as a result of the Pauli >> Exclusion Principle and the repulsive van der Waals force, KookTard, >> and once they've cancelled, how is polarity reestablished, and how is >> that not dissociating the water? Why can't you answer those questions which highlight your psychosis, James Bernard 'Tardnado' McGinn, Jr. of Antioch, CA? -- Here, James, at the very least, try to address those tough questions which spotlight the logical inconsistencies and contradictions inherent in your "theory": ============================================================ Why are you known as Tardnado McGinn, the delusional moronic ignorant uneducated psychotic babbling loon, James? Why have you been legally deemed to be mentally incompetent and a lifelong ward of your parents James, Sr. and Constance, necessitating that you live with your parents because you'd be a danger to yourself if you lived independently, James? Is it your paranoid schizophrenia? Is that why your mommy has to feed you, dress you, wipe your ass and help you to not piss all over yourself? And you call yourself a scientist, James? You're nothing more than a pathetic basement-dwelling schizo-brained delusional loser. Anders Nilsson measured (https://youtu.be/7hGqlEpvODw?t=2156) a spectral peak that was not solid-phase nor liquid-phase water, James. You claim that water remains liquid-phase upon evaporation. What was Anders Nilsson measuring, James? Oh, that's right... gaseous phase water, thereby proving that evaporation entails a phase change, thereby proving latent heat of evaporation exists, thereby *dis*proving a gigantic chunk of your theory, James. You make a supposition that a "plasma not-a-plasma" is created from water due to wind shear, which transports energy throughout the atmosphere via wind driven by that plasma. Where does the energy come from to create your "wind shear" to create your "plasma not-a-plasma" if the "plasma not-a-plasma" cannot exist and thereby "transport energy" by driving that wind to create the "wind shear" which creates your "plasma not-a-plasma", unless there is "wind shear" to begin with, James? Your logic is so twisted you're going in circles. You've created a circulus in probando causality dilemma, which utterly destroys your theory, James. You've yet again slapped a patch on your theory, abandoning Coulomb's Law for a separate "mechanism" by which electrostatic attraction increases with increasing distance. How does your "mechanism" and electrostatic attraction in accordance with Coulomb's Law not mutually cancel, thereby dissociating all water, James? According to your "theory", electrostatic attraction *increases* with distance (in violation of Coulomb's Law), which means that when an electron falls in orbit, it has to *absorb* energy. And that higher energy level somehow translates into a *weaker* electrostatic attraction. Now let's look at the other side of the coin... the electron in orbit would give off energy, rise in orbit, and somehow, that *lower* energy level translates into a *stronger* electrostatic attraction... how's *that* work, James? Explain how you've not just violated the Law of Conservation of Energy on an atomic level. How do the polarity of the electron and the proton cancel if, as even you admit, there is a distance between them as a result of the Pauli Exclusion Principle and the repulsive van der Waals force, KookTard, and once they've cancelled, how is polarity reestablished, and how is that not dissociating the water? If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, why is the boiling point of water anomalously high as compared to other H-bonded hydrides, KookTard? If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, then water's cohesion would also drop. Why does it not do that, KookTard? If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, how is water *not* splitting up into hydroxide and hydronium ions, KookTard? If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, why does water have such a high latent heat of vaporization, a direct result of that same H bonding, KookTard? Of course, being the delusional uneducated moron that you are, you deny that water has any latent heat of vaporization... but you're *so* stupid that you didn't realize that your denial also means you deny that water has a gaseous phase, and that's just retarded. If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, why does water not become much more dense upon fully H bonding, KookTard? How do your "jet stream vortices" travel potentially hundreds of miles away from your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky", without detection by satellite *or* Doppler radar, and know where and when to touch down so they always hit only cumulonimbus clouds, rather than tornadoes randomly appearing out of the clear blue sky or from other types of clouds, James? Is your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky" sentient, James? Go on, Jim, tell us... *why* is there a "boundary" between the troposphere and the stratosphere... we're waiting, Jim... No answer, Jim? Is it because that's where your "sentient jet stream / giant tornado monster with noodly appendages" lives, and it likes it that way, Jim? Do you need your meds, Jim? How does a hot air balloon work, James? No plasma, no giant sentient tornado monster in the jet stream... how does it rise, Jim? Why can't you explain that, James? Why does water freeze from the top down, even if the heat sink is *below* the container of water? That's another question your "theory not-a-theory" can't answer. Why can't you provide the explanation and mathematics to prove your claim that humid air is heavier than dry air, James? Why can't you explain or mathematically model even *one* of your delusions, James? Why can't you get your delusions through the peer-review process, James? Why can't you even get your delusion on a pre-print server, James? Why are there *no* corroborating studies backing up your delusions, James? Why are you shunned by the scientific community, James? Why is your blather on the comments sections of websites being *deleted*, dismissed as the mad barking of a loon, James? Why are you described in the reviews of the "books" you've written as "delusional", "insane", and a "conspiracy theorist", James? Why did you *fail* *out* of an elective Basic Meteorology class, in which they teach the very concepts you're blathering out your lack of education about now, James? Why do you so hate meteorologists, James? Is it because you failed out of the elective Basic Meteorology class because you've legally been deemed mentally incompetent, James? Why do you use your failing out of an elective Basic Meteorology class as the basis to claim yourself to be a "physicist not-a-physicist", James? Do you not understand that physicists are highly educated, whereas you're ignorant and uneducated? What universities did you attend, what were your majors and what was the topic of your Ph.D. thesis, James? You don't have a Ph.D? Then you're not a physicist, James. LOL If, as you claim, the jet stream is a vortex, why is the ride while inside the jet stream so smooth, James? Have you never ridden in an airplane inside a jet stream, James? Is it just that your "sentient jet stream / giant tornado monster with noodly appendages" likes its back scratched by the aircraft, so it doesn't rip the aircraft to shreds, Jim? Do you not understand that once the air going upward through the tornadic funnel reaches the cumulonimbus cloud base above the mesocyclone, it spreads out, thus the tornado is strictly a phenomenon which happens from cloud base to ground? It does *not* go from the ground all the way up through the cloud to the tropopause as you claim, James, and it most certainly does not continue for potentially thousands of miles in the upper troposphere to join the jet stream, which would make air travel deadly. Explain why the jets run easterly, whereas the dry line runs N-S, if the jets are powering the creation of tornadoes. How is a tornado being created hundreds of miles from the edge of the jets, James? Which direction does air flow from a flame, Jim? Up, does it not? That's convection due to temperature-induced density differential, is it not? Which direction does air flow from a flame in zero gravity, James? Radially in all directions, thereby snuffing out the flame due to lack of oxygen. So your claiming that convection doesn't exist means you're further claiming that gravity does not exist, and fire cannot burn for very long before it is smothered due to lack of oxygen. Or were you not aware that convection is a gravity-induced phenomenon due to density differential, James? How are your atmospheric "water droplets" forming if they're plasma, Jim? Do you not know that water droplets *minimize* surface area, James? How are your "plasma not-a-plasma" "water droplets" *maximizing* their surface area as you claim? Do you not know what the definition of "plasma" is, James? How is your "plasma not-a-plasma" (which you have admitted is a hypothetical construct in a failed attempt to lend your claims even a semblance of plausibility) forming if the nuclear binding energy and dissociation energy of water are identical, and thus the water will preferentially dissociate into hydrogen and oxygen unless hit with an extremely energetic laser, Jim? Where is the energy (equivalent to photons of 103.32 nm wavelength, extremely strong ultraviolet, just 3.32 nm away from x-rays... except photons with shorter wavelength than 121 nm are absorbed high above the troposphere because they ionize air so well) coming from in the troposphere to form your "plasma not-a-plasma", Jim? How is the energy to plasmize your "plasma not-a-plasma" not dissociating all water on the planet and killing all life on the planet given that the energy *must* be in the troposphere where nearly all the water is, and where all life is, Jim? Now that it's been proven that water molecule polarity doesn't change upon H bonding (which would have side effects such as random changes in the solvent properties of water... and we know those properties do not randomly change, Jim), and in fact the two spin isomers of water molecules account for the different H bonding strengths which account for evaporation and condensation, do you still contend that your implausible claims are workable, Jim? Why are you not taking your meds, James? ============================================================ Why can't you answer those questions, Tardnado Jim?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-08 10:16 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <56b73108ef7fe2487dca4a0236cfaec2@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #656766 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> James 'Tardnado' McGinn, in <news:c18fa68c-ca28-4532-b451-79912aeb2ca6@googlegroups.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Wednesday, April 6, 2016 at 11:22:31 PM UTC-7, > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >> James 'Tardnado' McGinn, in >> <news:dd32b95f-7b28-4d09-a291-4d79345f1faf@googlegroups.com> did >> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: >>> On Tuesday, March 29, 2016 at 10:32:46 AM UTC-7, >>> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >>>> James 'Tardnado' McGinn, in >>>> <news:e326f716-9441-4866-b875-e3a23abb28a3@googlegroups.com> did >>>> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: >>>>> On Monday, March 28, 2016 at 10:36:38 PM UTC-7, >>>>> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >>>>>> James Bernard 'Tardnado' McGinn, Jr. of Antioch, CA, socked up as >>>>>> Solving Tornadoes, in >>>>>> <news:4318ff9a-9c4d-4f20-84cd-5dc418054025@googlegroups.com> did >>>>>> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: >>>>>>> On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 11:02:47 PM UTC-7, >>>>>>> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >>>>>>>>> Obviously not. >>>>>>>> That's right. It's obvious that you're fooling no one. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You claim Coulomb's Law states the exact opposite of what it actually >>>>>>>> states >>>>>>> You are delibately misrepresenting my words. >>>>>> I'm not. In fact, when you were called on your dishonest attempt to >>>>>> twist Coulomb's Law to state exactly the opposite of what it actually >>>>>> states so you could fit it to your delusion, you invented an entirely >>>>>> new "mechanism" of electrostatic attraction which works opposite to >>>>>> Coulomb's Law... >>>>> You >>>> Did your mommy drink like an Irishman when she was pregnant with you, >>>> James? Is that what fucked up your brain? Or did she pass on her >>>> wicked case of Irish syphilis to you and they didn't catch it until >>>> it'd eaten half your brain? Or was your congenital birth defect in the >>>> form of severe mental retardation the result of the usual Irish >>>> incest? LOL >>>> >>>> You fucking boob, you're a joke, a laughingstock. Your name has now >>>> become a verb in scientific circles describing scientific fraud. LOL >>>> >>>> "The IPCC sure McGinn'd that temperature data. It's obvious they >>>> changed it again. What retard thought he could get away with that?" >>>> >>>> I did that to you, James. Yer welcome. >>>> >>>> <snicker> >> James? No reply, James? >>>>> still are dishonestly paraphrasing my words instead of quoting me >>>>> directly. You seem to have no understanding of intellectual honestly. >>>> That's rich, coming from the broken-brained retard trying to twist >>>> scientific concepts to fit his delusion, which he's forced to shift >>>> around as he slaps patches on it to cover up those gaping logic holes, >>>> only to expose even more holes. >> James? No reply, James? >>>>> You don't get it. >>>>> >>>>> You are a child. >>>> You're a mentally ill halfwit with a broken schizo-brain and a >>>> penchant for lying, James. You're a scientific fraud and a worldwide >>>> laughingstock. You're the pathetic clown too stupid to understand >>>> reality. You're the crayon-scribbling mushbrain who's going to >>>> "class-action" kooksoot *science*, *reality*, *electrons*, *photons* >>>> and the *universe* for their part in that giant conspiracy to thwart >>>> your attempts to remodel reality to fit your delusions. >>>> >>>> Where's that kooksoot, James? Did you wear your crayons to a nub, and >>>> mommy won't buy you any more? LOL >>>> >>>> You sad pathetic brain-damaged little halfwit. If you had half the >>>> sense that God gave a fucking garden slug, you'd be embarrassed for >>>> yourself... if you had half the sense that God gave a fucking garden >>>> slug. >> James? No reply, James? >>> Do you now concede that my model harbors no contradiction with >>> Coulomb's Law? Yes? No? >> Your "model not-a-model" is in direct contradiction to Coulomb's Law >> and reality, James. > My model harbors no dispute with Coulomb's law. Liar. You've tried to twist Coulomb's Law to say the exact opposite of what it actually says, in order to try to twist reality to fit your delusion, James. When called on it, you invented an entirely new "mechanism" that's never been detected by hundreds of thousands of researchers, and which works oppositely to electrostatic attraction. But you're too stupid to realize that in so doing, all H bonding would be negated, and all water would become gaseous-phase... ironically, you deny that water has a gaseous-phase, as well because you deny latent heat... so you're a thoroughly confused moron who is far too uneducated to even know what you don't know. > If you think I am mistaken then you should feel free to make a > detailed argument to that effect. I just did, James. You'll yet again find yourself utterly unable to refute it, so you'll backpedal, evade, blurt a non sequitur, and run away... thereby allowing me to once again GoogleStack the fact that you, James Bernard McGinn, Jr. of Antioch, CA are a broken-brained schizophrenic off your meds. >> You tried to twist Coulomb's Law to state the >> exact opposite of what it actually states, > Reference? Stop backpedaling, you spankard. You've been proven wrong. Again. Just admit it, fix your fucked up "theory not-a-theory" to reflect reality, and carry on. Your pathetic crying here doesn't lend scientific credence to your delusional blather. >> and when called on it, you >> gave up on that and pulled a whole new "mechanism not-a-mechanism" >> straight from your ass that acted opposite to Coulomb's Law, not >> realizing that the two would mutually cancel and dissociate all water >> immediately... because you're James Bernard 'Tardnado' McGinn, Jr. of >> Antioch, CA, the broken-brained uneducated moronic halfwit who is too >> insane to recognize reality, let alone acknowledge it, let alone model >> it. >> >> That's why you've had to live your entire life in mommy and daddy's >> basement, James... you'd be a danger to yourself and others if you >> lived independently. You'd chimp out like Rainman on bath salts and >> make the nightly news. >> >> Of course, you're headed that way anyway. You're the only one who >> doesn't see that reality, James. Then after an extended stay in the >> Home For The Criminally Insane, you'll be released to shamble from >> street corner to street corner, dirty and disheveled, with a ankle >> bracelet monitor, begging for spare change and muttering to no one in >> particular that you used to be a "physicist not-a-physicist", and >> cursing the letters 'e', 'F', 'N', 'V' and 'W', not necessarily in >> that order. >> >> Or you could submit to the Meteorology Cabal, James. You won't have a >> happy life, or much of a life at all, really, but for the odd jobs you >> do in service to the Meteorology Cabal, you'll have a roof over your >> head, such as it is. >> >> Remember, James, the Meteorology Cabal is always watching you. And >> also remember that we don't exist. This is all just a figment of your >> delusion. You've been pounding on your keyboard for no reason, cursing >> a ghost who haunts only you. >> >> Just take your meds, James. Then everything will be alright. You have >> no reason to suspect that they've been switched out for brainwashing >> drugs. Your own mother wouldn't do that to you. Right, James? >> >> James? >> >> Right, James? >> >> <snicker> Why can't you answer those questions which highlight your psychosis, James Bernard 'Tardnado' McGinn, Jr. of Antioch, CA? -- Here, James, at the very least, try to address those tough questions which spotlight the logical inconsistencies and contradictions inherent in your "theory": ============================================================ Why are you known as Tardnado McGinn, the delusional moronic ignorant uneducated psychotic babbling loon, James? Why have you been legally deemed to be mentally incompetent and a lifelong ward of your parents James, Sr. and Constance, necessitating that you live with your parents because you'd be a danger to yourself if you lived independently, James? Is it your paranoid schizophrenia? Is that why your mommy has to feed you, dress you, wipe your ass and help you to not piss all over yourself? And you call yourself a scientist, James? You're nothing more than a pathetic basement-dwelling schizo-brained delusional loser. Anders Nilsson measured (https://youtu.be/7hGqlEpvODw?t=2156) a spectral peak that was not solid-phase nor liquid-phase water, James. You claim that water remains liquid-phase upon evaporation. What was Anders Nilsson measuring, James? Oh, that's right... gaseous phase water, thereby proving that evaporation entails a phase change, thereby proving latent heat of evaporation exists, thereby *dis*proving a gigantic chunk of your theory, James. You make a supposition that a "plasma not-a-plasma" is created from water due to wind shear, which transports energy throughout the atmosphere via wind driven by that plasma. Where does the energy come from to create your "wind shear" to create your "plasma not-a-plasma" if the "plasma not-a-plasma" cannot exist and thereby "transport energy" by driving that wind to create the "wind shear" which creates your "plasma not-a-plasma", unless there is "wind shear" to begin with, James? Your logic is so twisted you're going in circles. You've created a circulus in probando causality dilemma, which utterly destroys your theory, James. You've yet again slapped a patch on your theory, abandoning Coulomb's Law for a separate "mechanism" by which electrostatic attraction increases with increasing distance. How does your "mechanism" and electrostatic attraction in accordance with Coulomb's Law not mutually cancel, thereby dissociating all water, James? According to your "theory", electrostatic attraction *increases* with distance (in violation of Coulomb's Law), which means that when an electron falls in orbit, it has to *absorb* energy. And that higher energy level somehow translates into a *weaker* electrostatic attraction. Now let's look at the other side of the coin... the electron in orbit would give off energy, rise in orbit, and somehow, that *lower* energy level translates into a *stronger* electrostatic attraction... how's *that* work, James? Explain how you've not just violated the Law of Conservation of Energy on an atomic level. How do the polarity of the electron and the proton cancel if, as even you admit, there is a distance between them as a result of the Pauli Exclusion Principle and the repulsive van der Waals force, KookTard, and once they've cancelled, how is polarity reestablished, and how is that not dissociating the water? If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, why is the boiling point of water anomalously high as compared to other H-bonded hydrides, KookTard? If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, then water's cohesion would also drop. Why does it not do that, KookTard? If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, how is water *not* splitting up into hydroxide and hydronium ions, KookTard? If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, why does water have such a high latent heat of vaporization, a direct result of that same H bonding, KookTard? Of course, being the delusional uneducated moron that you are, you deny that water has any latent heat of vaporization... but you're *so* stupid that you didn't realize that your denial also means you deny that water has a gaseous phase, and that's just retarded. If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, why does water not become much more dense upon fully H bonding, KookTard? How do your "jet stream vortices" travel potentially hundreds of miles away from your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky", without detection by satellite *or* Doppler radar, and know where and when to touch down so they always hit only cumulonimbus clouds, rather than tornadoes randomly appearing out of the clear blue sky or from other types of clouds, James? Is your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky" sentient, James? Go on, Jim, tell us... *why* is there a "boundary" between the troposphere and the stratosphere... we're waiting, Jim... No answer, Jim? Is it because that's where your "sentient jet stream / giant tornado monster with noodly appendages" lives, and it likes it that way, Jim? Do you need your meds, Jim? How does a hot air balloon work, James? No plasma, no giant sentient tornado monster in the jet stream... how does it rise, Jim? Why can't you explain that, James? Why does water freeze from the top down, even if the heat sink is *below* the container of water? That's another question your "theory not-a-theory" can't answer. Why can't you provide the explanation and mathematics to prove your claim that humid air is heavier than dry air, James? Why can't you explain or mathematically model even *one* of your delusions, James? Why can't you get your delusions through the peer-review process, James? Why can't you even get your delusion on a pre-print server, James? Why are there *no* corroborating studies backing up your delusions, James? Why are you shunned by the scientific community, James? Why is your blather on the comments sections of websites being *deleted*, dismissed as the mad barking of a loon, James? Why are you described in the reviews of the "books" you've written as "delusional", "insane", and a "conspiracy theorist", James? Why did you *fail* *out* of an elective Basic Meteorology class, in which they teach the very concepts you're blathering out your lack of education about now, James? Why do you so hate meteorologists, James? Is it because you failed out of the elective Basic Meteorology class because you've legally been deemed mentally incompetent, James? Why do you use your failing out of an elective Basic Meteorology class as the basis to claim yourself to be a "physicist not-a-physicist", James? Do you not understand that physicists are highly educated, whereas you're ignorant and uneducated? What universities did you attend, what were your majors and what was the topic of your Ph.D. thesis, James? You don't have a Ph.D? Then you're not a physicist, James. LOL If, as you claim, the jet stream is a vortex, why is the ride while inside the jet stream so smooth, James? Have you never ridden in an airplane inside a jet stream, James? Is it just that your "sentient jet stream / giant tornado monster with noodly appendages" likes its back scratched by the aircraft, so it doesn't rip the aircraft to shreds, Jim? Do you not understand that once the air going upward through the tornadic funnel reaches the cumulonimbus cloud base above the mesocyclone, it spreads out, thus the tornado is strictly a phenomenon which happens from cloud base to ground? It does *not* go from the ground all the way up through the cloud to the tropopause as you claim, James, and it most certainly does not continue for potentially thousands of miles in the upper troposphere to join the jet stream, which would make air travel deadly. Explain why the jets run easterly, whereas the dry line runs N-S, if the jets are powering the creation of tornadoes. How is a tornado being created hundreds of miles from the edge of the jets, James? Which direction does air flow from a flame, Jim? Up, does it not? That's convection due to temperature-induced density differential, is it not? Which direction does air flow from a flame in zero gravity, James? Radially in all directions, thereby snuffing out the flame due to lack of oxygen. So your claiming that convection doesn't exist means you're further claiming that gravity does not exist, and fire cannot burn for very long before it is smothered due to lack of oxygen. Or were you not aware that convection is a gravity-induced phenomenon due to density differential, James? How are your atmospheric "water droplets" forming if they're plasma, Jim? Do you not know that water droplets *minimize* surface area, James? How are your "plasma not-a-plasma" "water droplets" *maximizing* their surface area as you claim? Do you not know what the definition of "plasma" is, James? How is your "plasma not-a-plasma" (which you have admitted is a hypothetical construct in a failed attempt to lend your claims even a semblance of plausibility) forming if the nuclear binding energy and dissociation energy of water are identical, and thus the water will preferentially dissociate into hydrogen and oxygen unless hit with an extremely energetic laser, Jim? Where is the energy (equivalent to photons of 103.32 nm wavelength, extremely strong ultraviolet, just 3.32 nm away from x-rays... except photons with shorter wavelength than 121 nm are absorbed high above the troposphere because they ionize air so well) coming from in the troposphere to form your "plasma not-a-plasma", Jim? How is the energy to plasmize your "plasma not-a-plasma" not dissociating all water on the planet and killing all life on the planet given that the energy *must* be in the troposphere where nearly all the water is, and where all life is, Jim? Now that it's been proven that water molecule polarity doesn't change upon H bonding (which would have side effects such as random changes in the solvent properties of water... and we know those properties do not randomly change, Jim), and in fact the two spin isomers of water molecules account for the different H bonding strengths which account for evaporation and condensation, do you still contend that your implausible claims are workable, Jim? Why are you not taking your meds, James? ============================================================ Why can't you answer those questions, Tardnado Jim?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-08 18:28 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <fd1c2107fa3022615bd4c55d1ce9b7d1@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #657009 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> James 'Tardnado' McGinn, in <news:4de67ec3-5509-44d5-a5a0-90c8f5c236ac@googlegroups.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Friday, April 8, 2016 at 1:28:01 AM UTC-7, > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >> James 'Tardnado' McGinn, in >> <news:c18fa68c-ca28-4532-b451-79912aeb2ca6@googlegroups.com> did >> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: >>> On Wednesday, April 6, 2016 at 11:22:31 PM UTC-7, >>> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >>>> James 'Tardnado' McGinn, in >>>> <news:dd32b95f-7b28-4d09-a291-4d79345f1faf@googlegroups.com> did >>>> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: >>>>> On Tuesday, March 29, 2016 at 10:32:46 AM UTC-7, >>>>> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >>>>>> James 'Tardnado' McGinn, in >>>>>> <news:e326f716-9441-4866-b875-e3a23abb28a3@googlegroups.com> did >>>>>> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: >>>>>>> On Monday, March 28, 2016 at 10:36:38 PM UTC-7, >>>>>>> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >>>>>>>> James Bernard 'Tardnado' McGinn, Jr. of Antioch, CA, socked up as >>>>>>>> Solving Tornadoes, in >>>>>>>> <news:4318ff9a-9c4d-4f20-84cd-5dc418054025@googlegroups.com> did >>>>>>>> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: >>>>>>>>> On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 11:02:47 PM UTC-7, >>>>>>>>> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Obviously not. >>>>>>>>>> That's right. It's obvious that you're fooling no one. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You claim Coulomb's Law states the exact opposite of what it actually >>>>>>>>>> states >>>>>>>>> You are delibately misrepresenting my words. >>>>>>>> I'm not. In fact, when you were called on your dishonest attempt to >>>>>>>> twist Coulomb's Law to state exactly the opposite of what it actually >>>>>>>> states so you could fit it to your delusion, you invented an entirely >>>>>>>> new "mechanism" of electrostatic attraction which works opposite to >>>>>>>> Coulomb's Law... >>>>>>> You >>>>>> Did your mommy drink like an Irishman when she was pregnant with you, >>>>>> James? Is that what fucked up your brain? Or did she pass on her >>>>>> wicked case of Irish syphilis to you and they didn't catch it until >>>>>> it'd eaten half your brain? Or was your congenital birth defect in the >>>>>> form of severe mental retardation the result of the usual Irish >>>>>> incest? LOL >>>>>> >>>>>> You fucking boob, you're a joke, a laughingstock. Your name has now >>>>>> become a verb in scientific circles describing scientific fraud. LOL >>>>>> >>>>>> "The IPCC sure McGinn'd that temperature data. It's obvious they >>>>>> changed it again. What retard thought he could get away with that?" >>>>>> >>>>>> I did that to you, James. Yer welcome. >>>>>> >>>>>> <snicker> >>>> James? No reply, James? >>>>>>> still are dishonestly paraphrasing my words instead of quoting me >>>>>>> directly. You seem to have no understanding of intellectual honestly. >>>>>> That's rich, coming from the broken-brained retard trying to twist >>>>>> scientific concepts to fit his delusion, which he's forced to shift >>>>>> around as he slaps patches on it to cover up those gaping logic holes, >>>>>> only to expose even more holes. >>>> James? No reply, James? >>>>>>> You don't get it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You are a child. >>>>>> You're a mentally ill halfwit with a broken schizo-brain and a >>>>>> penchant for lying, James. You're a scientific fraud and a worldwide >>>>>> laughingstock. You're the pathetic clown too stupid to understand >>>>>> reality. You're the crayon-scribbling mushbrain who's going to >>>>>> "class-action" kooksoot *science*, *reality*, *electrons*, *photons* >>>>>> and the *universe* for their part in that giant conspiracy to thwart >>>>>> your attempts to remodel reality to fit your delusions. >>>>>> >>>>>> Where's that kooksoot, James? Did you wear your crayons to a nub, and >>>>>> mommy won't buy you any more? LOL >>>>>> >>>>>> You sad pathetic brain-damaged little halfwit. If you had half the >>>>>> sense that God gave a fucking garden slug, you'd be embarrassed for >>>>>> yourself... if you had half the sense that God gave a fucking garden >>>>>> slug. >>>> James? No reply, James? >>>>> Do you now concede that my model harbors no contradiction with >>>>> Coulomb's Law? Yes? No? >>>> Your "model not-a-model" is in direct contradiction to Coulomb's Law >>>> and reality, James. >>> My model harbors no dispute with Coulomb's law. >> Liar. You've tried to twist Coulomb's Law > I embrace Coulomb's Law. Liar. Prove it. >> to say the exact opposite of >> what it actually says, in order to try to twist reality to fit your >> delusion, James. When called on it, you invented an entirely new >> "mechanism" that's never been detected by hundreds of thousands of >> researchers, and which works oppositely to electrostatic attraction. >> But you're too stupid to realize that in so doing, all H bonding would >> be negated, and all water would become gaseous-phase... ironically, >> you deny that water has a gaseous-phase, as well because you deny >> latent heat... so you're a thoroughly confused moron who is far too >> uneducated to even know what you don't know. >>> If you think I am mistaken then you should feel free to make a >>> detailed argument to that effect. >> I just did, > Reference? In the quoted text. Where your response, James? A lack of response on your part indicates a support of my position, James. Is that what you wanted? >> James. You'll yet again find yourself utterly unable to >> refute it, so you'll backpedal, evade, blurt a non sequitur, and run >> away... thereby allowing me to once again GoogleStack the fact that >> you, James Bernard McGinn, Jr. of Antioch, CA are a broken-brained >> schizophrenic off your meds. >>>> You tried to twist Coulomb's Law to state the >>>> exact opposite of what it actually states, >>> Reference? >> Stop backpedaling, you spankard. You've been proven wrong. Again. Just >> admit it, fix your fucked up "theory not-a-theory" to reflect reality, >> and carry on. Your pathetic crying here doesn't lend scientific >> credence to your delusional blather. >>>> and when called on it, you >>>> gave up on that and pulled a whole new "mechanism not-a-mechanism" >>>> straight from your ass that acted opposite to Coulomb's Law, not >>>> realizing that the two would mutually cancel and dissociate all water >>>> immediately... because you're James Bernard 'Tardnado' McGinn, Jr. of >>>> Antioch, CA, the broken-brained uneducated moronic halfwit who is too >>>> insane to recognize reality, let alone acknowledge it, let alone model >>>> it. >>>> >>>> That's why you've had to live your entire life in mommy and daddy's >>>> basement, James... you'd be a danger to yourself and others if you >>>> lived independently. You'd chimp out like Rainman on bath salts and >>>> make the nightly news. >>>> >>>> Of course, you're headed that way anyway. You're the only one who >>>> doesn't see that reality, James. Then after an extended stay in the >>>> Home For The Criminally Insane, you'll be released to shamble from >>>> street corner to street corner, dirty and disheveled, with a ankle >>>> bracelet monitor, begging for spare change and muttering to no one in >>>> particular that you used to be a "physicist not-a-physicist", and >>>> cursing the letters 'e', 'F', 'N', 'V' and 'W', not necessarily in >>>> that order. >>>> >>>> Or you could submit to the Meteorology Cabal, James. You won't have a >>>> happy life, or much of a life at all, really, but for the odd jobs you >>>> do in service to the Meteorology Cabal, you'll have a roof over your >>>> head, such as it is. >>>> >>>> Remember, James, the Meteorology Cabal is always watching you. And >>>> also remember that we don't exist. This is all just a figment of your >>>> delusion. You've been pounding on your keyboard for no reason, cursing >>>> a ghost who haunts only you. >>>> >>>> Just take your meds, James. Then everything will be alright. You have >>>> no reason to suspect that they've been switched out for brainwashing >>>> drugs. Your own mother wouldn't do that to you. Right, James? >>>> >>>> James? >>>> >>>> Right, James? >>>> >>>> <snicker> Why can't you answer those questions which highlight your psychosis, James Bernard 'Tardnado' McGinn, Jr. of Antioch, CA? -- Here, James, at the very least, try to address those tough questions which spotlight the logical inconsistencies and contradictions inherent in your "theory": ============================================================ Why are you known as Tardnado McGinn, the delusional moronic ignorant uneducated psychotic babbling loon, James? Why have you been legally deemed to be mentally incompetent and a lifelong ward of your parents James, Sr. and Constance, necessitating that you live with your parents because you'd be a danger to yourself if you lived independently, James? Is it your paranoid schizophrenia? Is that why your mommy has to feed you, dress you, wipe your ass and help you to not piss all over yourself? And you call yourself a scientist, James? You're nothing more than a pathetic basement-dwelling schizo-brained delusional loser. Anders Nilsson measured (https://youtu.be/7hGqlEpvODw?t=2156) a spectral peak that was not solid-phase nor liquid-phase water, James. You claim that water remains liquid-phase upon evaporation. What was Anders Nilsson measuring, James? Oh, that's right... gaseous phase water, thereby proving that evaporation entails a phase change, thereby proving latent heat of evaporation exists, thereby *dis*proving a gigantic chunk of your theory, James. You make a supposition that a "plasma not-a-plasma" is created from water due to wind shear, which transports energy throughout the atmosphere via wind driven by that plasma. Where does the energy come from to create your "wind shear" to create your "plasma not-a-plasma" if the "plasma not-a-plasma" cannot exist and thereby "transport energy" by driving that wind to create the "wind shear" which creates your "plasma not-a-plasma", unless there is "wind shear" to begin with, James? Your logic is so twisted you're going in circles. You've created a circulus in probando causality dilemma, which utterly destroys your theory, James. You've yet again slapped a patch on your theory, abandoning Coulomb's Law for a separate "mechanism" by which electrostatic attraction increases with increasing distance. How does your "mechanism" and electrostatic attraction in accordance with Coulomb's Law not mutually cancel, thereby dissociating all water, James? According to your "theory", electrostatic attraction *increases* with distance (in violation of Coulomb's Law), which means that when an electron falls in orbit, it has to *absorb* energy. And that higher energy level somehow translates into a *weaker* electrostatic attraction. Now let's look at the other side of the coin... the electron in orbit would give off energy, rise in orbit, and somehow, that *lower* energy level translates into a *stronger* electrostatic attraction... how's *that* work, James? Explain how you've not just violated the Law of Conservation of Energy on an atomic level. How do the polarity of the electron and the proton cancel if, as even you admit, there is a distance between them as a result of the Pauli Exclusion Principle and the repulsive van der Waals force, KookTard, and once they've cancelled, how is polarity reestablished, and how is that not dissociating the water? If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, why is the boiling point of water anomalously high as compared to other H-bonded hydrides, KookTard? If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, then water's cohesion would also drop. Why does it not do that, KookTard? If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, how is water *not* splitting up into hydroxide and hydronium ions, KookTard? If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, why does water have such a high latent heat of vaporization, a direct result of that same H bonding, KookTard? Of course, being the delusional uneducated moron that you are, you deny that water has any latent heat of vaporization... but you're *so* stupid that you didn't realize that your denial also means you deny that water has a gaseous phase, and that's just retarded. If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, why does water not become much more dense upon fully H bonding, KookTard? How do your "jet stream vortices" travel potentially hundreds of miles away from your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky", without detection by satellite *or* Doppler radar, and know where and when to touch down so they always hit only cumulonimbus clouds, rather than tornadoes randomly appearing out of the clear blue sky or from other types of clouds, James? Is your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky" sentient, James? Go on, Jim, tell us... *why* is there a "boundary" between the troposphere and the stratosphere... we're waiting, Jim... No answer, Jim? Is it because that's where your "sentient jet stream / giant tornado monster with noodly appendages" lives, and it likes it that way, Jim? Do you need your meds, Jim? How does a hot air balloon work, James? No plasma, no giant sentient tornado monster in the jet stream... how does it rise, Jim? Why can't you explain that, James? Why does water freeze from the top down, even if the heat sink is *below* the container of water? That's another question your "theory not-a-theory" can't answer. Why can't you provide the explanation and mathematics to prove your claim that humid air is heavier than dry air, James? Why can't you explain or mathematically model even *one* of your delusions, James? Why can't you get your delusions through the peer-review process, James? Why can't you even get your delusion on a pre-print server, James? Why are there *no* corroborating studies backing up your delusions, James? Why are you shunned by the scientific community, James? Why is your blather on the comments sections of websites being *deleted*, dismissed as the mad barking of a loon, James? Why are you described in the reviews of the "books" you've written as "delusional", "insane", and a "conspiracy theorist", James? Why did you *fail* *out* of an elective Basic Meteorology class, in which they teach the very concepts you're blathering out your lack of education about now, James? Why do you so hate meteorologists, James? Is it because you failed out of the elective Basic Meteorology class because you've legally been deemed mentally incompetent, James? Why do you use your failing out of an elective Basic Meteorology class as the basis to claim yourself to be a "physicist not-a-physicist", James? Do you not understand that physicists are highly educated, whereas you're ignorant and uneducated? What universities did you attend, what were your majors and what was the topic of your Ph.D. thesis, James? You don't have a Ph.D? Then you're not a physicist, James. LOL If, as you claim, the jet stream is a vortex, why is the ride while inside the jet stream so smooth, James? Have you never ridden in an airplane inside a jet stream, James? Is it just that your "sentient jet stream / giant tornado monster with noodly appendages" likes its back scratched by the aircraft, so it doesn't rip the aircraft to shreds, Jim? Do you not understand that once the air going upward through the tornadic funnel reaches the cumulonimbus cloud base above the mesocyclone, it spreads out, thus the tornado is strictly a phenomenon which happens from cloud base to ground? It does *not* go from the ground all the way up through the cloud to the tropopause as you claim, James, and it most certainly does not continue for potentially thousands of miles in the upper troposphere to join the jet stream, which would make air travel deadly. Explain why the jets run easterly, whereas the dry line runs N-S, if the jets are powering the creation of tornadoes. How is a tornado being created hundreds of miles from the edge of the jets, James? Which direction does air flow from a flame, Jim? Up, does it not? That's convection due to temperature-induced density differential, is it not? Which direction does air flow from a flame in zero gravity, James? Radially in all directions, thereby snuffing out the flame due to lack of oxygen. So your claiming that convection doesn't exist means you're further claiming that gravity does not exist, and fire cannot burn for very long before it is smothered due to lack of oxygen. Or were you not aware that convection is a gravity-induced phenomenon due to density differential, James? How are your atmospheric "water droplets" forming if they're plasma, Jim? Do you not know that water droplets *minimize* surface area, James? How are your "plasma not-a-plasma" "water droplets" *maximizing* their surface area as you claim? Do you not know what the definition of "plasma" is, James? How is your "plasma not-a-plasma" (which you have admitted is a hypothetical construct in a failed attempt to lend your claims even a semblance of plausibility) forming if the nuclear binding energy and dissociation energy of water are identical, and thus the water will preferentially dissociate into hydrogen and oxygen unless hit with an extremely energetic laser, Jim? Where is the energy (equivalent to photons of 103.32 nm wavelength, extremely strong ultraviolet, just 3.32 nm away from x-rays... except photons with shorter wavelength than 121 nm are absorbed high above the troposphere because they ionize air so well) coming from in the troposphere to form your "plasma not-a-plasma", Jim? How is the energy to plasmize your "plasma not-a-plasma" not dissociating all water on the planet and killing all life on the planet given that the energy *must* be in the troposphere where nearly all the water is, and where all life is, Jim? Now that it's been proven that water molecule polarity doesn't change upon H bonding (which would have side effects such as random changes in the solvent properties of water... and we know those properties do not randomly change, Jim), and in fact the two spin isomers of water molecules account for the different H bonding strengths which account for evaporation and condensation, do you still contend that your implausible claims are workable, Jim? Why are you not taking your meds, James? ============================================================ Why can't you answer those questions, Tardnado Jim?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-09 07:27 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <9d6a0429c9cf1a959fcd93822a095ed8@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #657066 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> James McGinn, in <news:8e24262a-6d45-4b69-b0d1-3862f51f3dbf@googlegroups.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Friday, April 8, 2016 at 9:39:58 AM UTC-7, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >>>> Liar. You've tried to twist Coulomb's Law >>> I embrace Coulomb's Law. >> Liar. Prove it. > I think you've done as good as possible to demonstrate the validity of > meteorology's storm theory. In the future, when people ask me to present an > aggregation of the best evidence to support the current paradigm of > meteorology's storm theory I am going to point them to your posts. Because > here's the thing. Meteorologists won't do what you did. They know it's > futile. They know that any attempt to demonstrate the validity of their > understanding of storms (especially with respect to their characterization of > the role of water) will only expose it is absurdly flawed. > > I also think you've done as good as is possible to dispute my theoretical > thinking. Of course you are extremely scattered and desperate. But people will > see through that and realize that you actually made some effort. Again, and > for the same reasons, this is not something meteorologists would ever do. > > Thank you for your participation. You've been a big help. Your concession speech is noted, James. Did you think you would win against a far smarter and saner opponent backed up by centuries of scientific fact, while all you had was your delusional blather, your lies, your non sequiturs and your medical meth? Your inability to provide proof for you delusion, and your inability to explain away your multiple lies, is noted, James. Are you simply too retarded to convey the explanations? Are you too stupid to find them? Did you lose them? Answer the questions, you evasive shitbag. Why can't you answer those questions which highlight your psychosis, James Bernard 'Tardnado' McGinn, Jr. of Antioch, CA? -- Here, James, at the very least, try to address those tough questions which spotlight the logical inconsistencies and contradictions inherent in your "theory": ============================================================ Why are you known as Tardnado McGinn, the delusional moronic ignorant uneducated psychotic babbling loon, James? Why have you been legally deemed to be mentally incompetent and a lifelong ward of your parents James, Sr. and Constance, necessitating that you live with your parents because you'd be a danger to yourself if you lived independently, James? Is it your paranoid schizophrenia? Is that why your mommy has to feed you, dress you, wipe your ass and help you to not piss all over yourself? And you call yourself a scientist, James? You're nothing more than a pathetic basement-dwelling schizo-brained delusional loser. Anders Nilsson measured (https://youtu.be/7hGqlEpvODw?t=2156) a spectral peak that was not solid-phase nor liquid-phase water, James. You claim that water remains liquid-phase upon evaporation. What was Anders Nilsson measuring, James? Oh, that's right... gaseous phase water, thereby proving that evaporation entails a phase change, thereby proving latent heat of evaporation exists, thereby *dis*proving a gigantic chunk of your theory, James. You make a supposition that a "plasma not-a-plasma" is created from water due to wind shear, which transports energy throughout the atmosphere via wind driven by that plasma. Where does the energy come from to create your "wind shear" to create your "plasma not-a-plasma" if the "plasma not-a-plasma" cannot exist and thereby "transport energy" by driving that wind to create the "wind shear" which creates your "plasma not-a-plasma", unless there is "wind shear" to begin with, James? Your logic is so twisted you're going in circles. You've created a circulus in probando causality dilemma, which utterly destroys your theory, James. You've yet again slapped a patch on your theory, abandoning Coulomb's Law for a separate "mechanism" by which electrostatic attraction increases with increasing distance. How does your "mechanism" and electrostatic attraction in accordance with Coulomb's Law not mutually cancel, thereby dissociating all water, James? According to your "theory", electrostatic attraction *increases* with distance (in violation of Coulomb's Law), which means that when an electron falls in orbit, it has to *absorb* energy. And that higher energy level somehow translates into a *weaker* electrostatic attraction. Now let's look at the other side of the coin... the electron in orbit would give off energy, rise in orbit, and somehow, that *lower* energy level translates into a *stronger* electrostatic attraction... how's *that* work, James? Explain how you've not just violated the Law of Conservation of Energy on an atomic level. How do the polarity of the electron and the proton cancel if, as even you admit, there is a distance between them as a result of the Pauli Exclusion Principle and the repulsive van der Waals force, KookTard, and once they've cancelled, how is polarity reestablished, and how is that not dissociating the water? If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, why is the boiling point of water anomalously high as compared to other H-bonded hydrides, KookTard? If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, then water's cohesion would also drop. Why does it not do that, KookTard? If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, how is water *not* splitting up into hydroxide and hydronium ions, KookTard? If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, why does water have such a high latent heat of vaporization, a direct result of that same H bonding, KookTard? Of course, being the delusional uneducated moron that you are, you deny that water has any latent heat of vaporization... but you're *so* stupid that you didn't realize that your denial also means you deny that water has a gaseous phase, and that's just retarded. If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, why does water not become much more dense upon fully H bonding, KookTard? How do your "jet stream vortices" travel potentially hundreds of miles away from your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky", without detection by satellite *or* Doppler radar, and know where and when to touch down so they always hit only cumulonimbus clouds, rather than tornadoes randomly appearing out of the clear blue sky or from other types of clouds, James? Is your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky" sentient, James? Go on, Jim, tell us... *why* is there a "boundary" between the troposphere and the stratosphere... we're waiting, Jim... No answer, Jim? Is it because that's where your "sentient jet stream / giant tornado monster with noodly appendages" lives, and it likes it that way, Jim? Do you need your meds, Jim? How does a hot air balloon work, James? No plasma, no giant sentient tornado monster in the jet stream... how does it rise, Jim? Why can't you explain that, James? Why does water freeze from the top down, even if the heat sink is *below* the container of water? That's another question your "theory not-a-theory" can't answer. Why can't you provide the explanation and mathematics to prove your claim that humid air is heavier than dry air, James? Why can't you explain or mathematically model even *one* of your delusions, James? Why can't you get your delusions through the peer-review process, James? Why can't you even get your delusion on a pre-print server, James? Why are there *no* corroborating studies backing up your delusions, James? Why are you shunned by the scientific community, James? Why is your blather on the comments sections of websites being *deleted*, dismissed as the mad barking of a loon, James? Why are you described in the reviews of the "books" you've written as "delusional", "insane", and a "conspiracy theorist", James? Why did you *fail* *out* of an elective Basic Meteorology class, in which they teach the very concepts you're blathering out your lack of education about now, James? Why do you so hate meteorologists, James? Is it because you failed out of the elective Basic Meteorology class because you've legally been deemed mentally incompetent, James? Why do you use your failing out of an elective Basic Meteorology class as the basis to claim yourself to be a "physicist not-a-physicist", James? Do you not understand that physicists are highly educated, whereas you're ignorant and uneducated? What universities did you attend, what were your majors and what was the topic of your Ph.D. thesis, James? You don't have a Ph.D? Then you're not a physicist, James. LOL If, as you claim, the jet stream is a vortex, why is the ride while inside the jet stream so smooth, James? Have you never ridden in an airplane inside a jet stream, James? Is it just that your "sentient jet stream / giant tornado monster with noodly appendages" likes its back scratched by the aircraft, so it doesn't rip the aircraft to shreds, Jim? Do you not understand that once the air going upward through the tornadic funnel reaches the cumulonimbus cloud base above the mesocyclone, it spreads out, thus the tornado is strictly a phenomenon which happens from cloud base to ground? It does *not* go from the ground all the way up through the cloud to the tropopause as you claim, James, and it most certainly does not continue for potentially thousands of miles in the upper troposphere to join the jet stream, which would make air travel deadly. Explain why the jets run easterly, whereas the dry line runs N-S, if the jets are powering the creation of tornadoes. How is a tornado being created hundreds of miles from the edge of the jets, James? Which direction does air flow from a flame, Jim? Up, does it not? That's convection due to temperature-induced density differential, is it not? Which direction does air flow from a flame in zero gravity, James? Radially in all directions, thereby snuffing out the flame due to lack of oxygen. So your claiming that convection doesn't exist means you're further claiming that gravity does not exist, and fire cannot burn for very long before it is smothered due to lack of oxygen. Or were you not aware that convection is a gravity-induced phenomenon due to density differential, James? How are your atmospheric "water droplets" forming if they're plasma, Jim? Do you not know that water droplets *minimize* surface area, James? How are your "plasma not-a-plasma" "water droplets" *maximizing* their surface area as you claim? Do you not know what the definition of "plasma" is, James? How is your "plasma not-a-plasma" (which you have admitted is a hypothetical construct in a failed attempt to lend your claims even a semblance of plausibility) forming if the nuclear binding energy and dissociation energy of water are identical, and thus the water will preferentially dissociate into hydrogen and oxygen unless hit with an extremely energetic laser, Jim? Where is the energy (equivalent to photons of 103.32 nm wavelength, extremely strong ultraviolet, just 3.32 nm away from x-rays... except photons with shorter wavelength than 121 nm are absorbed high above the troposphere because they ionize air so well) coming from in the troposphere to form your "plasma not-a-plasma", Jim? How is the energy to plasmize your "plasma not-a-plasma" not dissociating all water on the planet and killing all life on the planet given that the energy *must* be in the troposphere where nearly all the water is, and where all life is, Jim? Now that it's been proven that water molecule polarity doesn't change upon H bonding (which would have side effects such as random changes in the solvent properties of water... and we know those properties do not randomly change, Jim), and in fact the two spin isomers of water molecules account for the different H bonding strengths which account for evaporation and condensation, do you still contend that your implausible claims are workable, Jim? Why are you not taking your meds, James? ============================================================ Why can't you answer those questions, Tardnado Jim?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-08 20:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <5bfcc74be4036b083e9cb1afeb36540b@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #657009 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> James 'Tardnado' McGinn, in <news:4de67ec3-5509-44d5-a5a0-90c8f5c236ac@googlegroups.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Friday, April 8, 2016 at 1:28:01 AM UTC-7, > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >> James 'Tardnado' McGinn, in >> <news:c18fa68c-ca28-4532-b451-79912aeb2ca6@googlegroups.com> did >> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: >>> On Wednesday, April 6, 2016 at 11:22:31 PM UTC-7, >>> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >>>> James 'Tardnado' McGinn, in >>>> <news:dd32b95f-7b28-4d09-a291-4d79345f1faf@googlegroups.com> did >>>> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: >>>>> On Tuesday, March 29, 2016 at 10:32:46 AM UTC-7, >>>>> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >>>>>> James 'Tardnado' McGinn, in >>>>>> <news:e326f716-9441-4866-b875-e3a23abb28a3@googlegroups.com> did >>>>>> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: >>>>>>> On Monday, March 28, 2016 at 10:36:38 PM UTC-7, >>>>>>> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >>>>>>>> James Bernard 'Tardnado' McGinn, Jr. of Antioch, CA, socked up as >>>>>>>> Solving Tornadoes, in >>>>>>>> <news:4318ff9a-9c4d-4f20-84cd-5dc418054025@googlegroups.com> did >>>>>>>> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: >>>>>>>>> On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 11:02:47 PM UTC-7, >>>>>>>>> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Obviously not. >>>>>>>>>> That's right. It's obvious that you're fooling no one. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You claim Coulomb's Law states the exact opposite of what it actually >>>>>>>>>> states >>>>>>>>> You are delibately misrepresenting my words. >>>>>>>> I'm not. In fact, when you were called on your dishonest attempt to >>>>>>>> twist Coulomb's Law to state exactly the opposite of what it actually >>>>>>>> states so you could fit it to your delusion, you invented an entirely >>>>>>>> new "mechanism" of electrostatic attraction which works opposite to >>>>>>>> Coulomb's Law... >>>>>>> You >>>>>> Did your mommy drink like an Irishman when she was pregnant with you, >>>>>> James? Is that what fucked up your brain? Or did she pass on her >>>>>> wicked case of Irish syphilis to you and they didn't catch it until >>>>>> it'd eaten half your brain? Or was your congenital birth defect in the >>>>>> form of severe mental retardation the result of the usual Irish >>>>>> incest? LOL >>>>>> >>>>>> You fucking boob, you're a joke, a laughingstock. Your name has now >>>>>> become a verb in scientific circles describing scientific fraud. LOL >>>>>> >>>>>> "The IPCC sure McGinn'd that temperature data. It's obvious they >>>>>> changed it again. What retard thought he could get away with that?" >>>>>> >>>>>> I did that to you, James. Yer welcome. >>>>>> >>>>>> <snicker> >>>> James? No reply, James? >>>>>>> still are dishonestly paraphrasing my words instead of quoting me >>>>>>> directly. You seem to have no understanding of intellectual honestly. >>>>>> That's rich, coming from the broken-brained retard trying to twist >>>>>> scientific concepts to fit his delusion, which he's forced to shift >>>>>> around as he slaps patches on it to cover up those gaping logic holes, >>>>>> only to expose even more holes. >>>> James? No reply, James? >>>>>>> You don't get it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You are a child. >>>>>> You're a mentally ill halfwit with a broken schizo-brain and a >>>>>> penchant for lying, James. You're a scientific fraud and a worldwide >>>>>> laughingstock. You're the pathetic clown too stupid to understand >>>>>> reality. You're the crayon-scribbling mushbrain who's going to >>>>>> "class-action" kooksoot *science*, *reality*, *electrons*, *photons* >>>>>> and the *universe* for their part in that giant conspiracy to thwart >>>>>> your attempts to remodel reality to fit your delusions. >>>>>> >>>>>> Where's that kooksoot, James? Did you wear your crayons to a nub, and >>>>>> mommy won't buy you any more? LOL >>>>>> >>>>>> You sad pathetic brain-damaged little halfwit. If you had half the >>>>>> sense that God gave a fucking garden slug, you'd be embarrassed for >>>>>> yourself... if you had half the sense that God gave a fucking garden >>>>>> slug. >>>> James? No reply, James? >>>>> Do you now concede that my model harbors no contradiction with >>>>> Coulomb's Law? Yes? No? >>>> Your "model not-a-model" is in direct contradiction to Coulomb's Law >>>> and reality, James. >>> My model harbors no dispute with Coulomb's law. >> Liar. You've tried to twist Coulomb's Law > I embrace Coulomb's Law. Liar. Prove it. >> to say the exact opposite of >> what it actually says, in order to try to twist reality to fit your >> delusion, James. When called on it, you invented an entirely new >> "mechanism" that's never been detected by hundreds of thousands of >> researchers, and which works oppositely to electrostatic attraction. >> But you're too stupid to realize that in so doing, all H bonding would >> be negated, and all water would become gaseous-phase... ironically, >> you deny that water has a gaseous-phase, as well because you deny >> latent heat... so you're a thoroughly confused moron who is far too >> uneducated to even know what you don't know. >>> If you think I am mistaken then you should feel free to make a >>> detailed argument to that effect. >> I just did, > Reference? In the quoted text. Where your response, James? A lack of response on your part indicates a support of my position, James. Is that what you wanted? >> James. You'll yet again find yourself utterly unable to >> refute it, so you'll backpedal, evade, blurt a non sequitur, and run >> away... thereby allowing me to once again GoogleStack the fact that >> you, James Bernard McGinn, Jr. of Antioch, CA are a broken-brained >> schizophrenic off your meds. >>>> You tried to twist Coulomb's Law to state the >>>> exact opposite of what it actually states, >>> Reference? >> Stop backpedaling, you spankard. You've been proven wrong. Again. Just >> admit it, fix your fucked up "theory not-a-theory" to reflect reality, >> and carry on. Your pathetic crying here doesn't lend scientific >> credence to your delusional blather. >>>> and when called on it, you >>>> gave up on that and pulled a whole new "mechanism not-a-mechanism" >>>> straight from your ass that acted opposite to Coulomb's Law, not >>>> realizing that the two would mutually cancel and dissociate all water >>>> immediately... because you're James Bernard 'Tardnado' McGinn, Jr. of >>>> Antioch, CA, the broken-brained uneducated moronic halfwit who is too >>>> insane to recognize reality, let alone acknowledge it, let alone model >>>> it. >>>> >>>> That's why you've had to live your entire life in mommy and daddy's >>>> basement, James... you'd be a danger to yourself and others if you >>>> lived independently. You'd chimp out like Rainman on bath salts and >>>> make the nightly news. >>>> >>>> Of course, you're headed that way anyway. You're the only one who >>>> doesn't see that reality, James. Then after an extended stay in the >>>> Home For The Criminally Insane, you'll be released to shamble from >>>> street corner to street corner, dirty and disheveled, with a ankle >>>> bracelet monitor, begging for spare change and muttering to no one in >>>> particular that you used to be a "physicist not-a-physicist", and >>>> cursing the letters 'e', 'F', 'N', 'V' and 'W', not necessarily in >>>> that order. >>>> >>>> Or you could submit to the Meteorology Cabal, James. You won't have a >>>> happy life, or much of a life at all, really, but for the odd jobs you >>>> do in service to the Meteorology Cabal, you'll have a roof over your >>>> head, such as it is. >>>> >>>> Remember, James, the Meteorology Cabal is always watching you. And >>>> also remember that we don't exist. This is all just a figment of your >>>> delusion. You've been pounding on your keyboard for no reason, cursing >>>> a ghost who haunts only you. >>>> >>>> Just take your meds, James. Then everything will be alright. You have >>>> no reason to suspect that they've been switched out for brainwashing >>>> drugs. Your own mother wouldn't do that to you. Right, James? >>>> >>>> James? >>>> >>>> Right, James? >>>> >>>> <snicker> Why can't you answer those questions which highlight your psychosis, James Bernard 'Tardnado' McGinn, Jr. of Antioch, CA? -- Here, James, at the very least, try to address those tough questions which spotlight the logical inconsistencies and contradictions inherent in your "theory": ============================================================ Why are you known as Tardnado McGinn, the delusional moronic ignorant uneducated psychotic babbling loon, James? Why have you been legally deemed to be mentally incompetent and a lifelong ward of your parents James, Sr. and Constance, necessitating that you live with your parents because you'd be a danger to yourself if you lived independently, James? Is it your paranoid schizophrenia? Is that why your mommy has to feed you, dress you, wipe your ass and help you to not piss all over yourself? And you call yourself a scientist, James? You're nothing more than a pathetic basement-dwelling schizo-brained delusional loser. Anders Nilsson measured (https://youtu.be/7hGqlEpvODw?t=2156) a spectral peak that was not solid-phase nor liquid-phase water, James. You claim that water remains liquid-phase upon evaporation. What was Anders Nilsson measuring, James? Oh, that's right... gaseous phase water, thereby proving that evaporation entails a phase change, thereby proving latent heat of evaporation exists, thereby *dis*proving a gigantic chunk of your theory, James. You make a supposition that a "plasma not-a-plasma" is created from water due to wind shear, which transports energy throughout the atmosphere via wind driven by that plasma. Where does the energy come from to create your "wind shear" to create your "plasma not-a-plasma" if the "plasma not-a-plasma" cannot exist and thereby "transport energy" by driving that wind to create the "wind shear" which creates your "plasma not-a-plasma", unless there is "wind shear" to begin with, James? Your logic is so twisted you're going in circles. You've created a circulus in probando causality dilemma, which utterly destroys your theory, James. You've yet again slapped a patch on your theory, abandoning Coulomb's Law for a separate "mechanism" by which electrostatic attraction increases with increasing distance. How does your "mechanism" and electrostatic attraction in accordance with Coulomb's Law not mutually cancel, thereby dissociating all water, James? According to your "theory", electrostatic attraction *increases* with distance (in violation of Coulomb's Law), which means that when an electron falls in orbit, it has to *absorb* energy. And that higher energy level somehow translates into a *weaker* electrostatic attraction. Now let's look at the other side of the coin... the electron in orbit would give off energy, rise in orbit, and somehow, that *lower* energy level translates into a *stronger* electrostatic attraction... how's *that* work, James? Explain how you've not just violated the Law of Conservation of Energy on an atomic level. How do the polarity of the electron and the proton cancel if, as even you admit, there is a distance between them as a result of the Pauli Exclusion Principle and the repulsive van der Waals force, KookTard, and once they've cancelled, how is polarity reestablished, and how is that not dissociating the water? If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, why is the boiling point of water anomalously high as compared to other H-bonded hydrides, KookTard? If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, then water's cohesion would also drop. Why does it not do that, KookTard? If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, how is water *not* splitting up into hydroxide and hydronium ions, KookTard? If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, why does water have such a high latent heat of vaporization, a direct result of that same H bonding, KookTard? Of course, being the delusional uneducated moron that you are, you deny that water has any latent heat of vaporization... but you're *so* stupid that you didn't realize that your denial also means you deny that water has a gaseous phase, and that's just retarded. If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, why does water not become much more dense upon fully H bonding, KookTard? How do your "jet stream vortices" travel potentially hundreds of miles away from your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky", without detection by satellite *or* Doppler radar, and know where and when to touch down so they always hit only cumulonimbus clouds, rather than tornadoes randomly appearing out of the clear blue sky or from other types of clouds, James? Is your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky" sentient, James? Go on, Jim, tell us... *why* is there a "boundary" between the troposphere and the stratosphere... we're waiting, Jim... No answer, Jim? Is it because that's where your "sentient jet stream / giant tornado monster with noodly appendages" lives, and it likes it that way, Jim? Do you need your meds, Jim? How does a hot air balloon work, James? No plasma, no giant sentient tornado monster in the jet stream... how does it rise, Jim? Why can't you explain that, James? Why does water freeze from the top down, even if the heat sink is *below* the container of water? That's another question your "theory not-a-theory" can't answer. Why can't you provide the explanation and mathematics to prove your claim that humid air is heavier than dry air, James? Why can't you explain or mathematically model even *one* of your delusions, James? Why can't you get your delusions through the peer-review process, James? Why can't you even get your delusion on a pre-print server, James? Why are there *no* corroborating studies backing up your delusions, James? Why are you shunned by the scientific community, James? Why is your blather on the comments sections of websites being *deleted*, dismissed as the mad barking of a loon, James? Why are you described in the reviews of the "books" you've written as "delusional", "insane", and a "conspiracy theorist", James? Why did you *fail* *out* of an elective Basic Meteorology class, in which they teach the very concepts you're blathering out your lack of education about now, James? Why do you so hate meteorologists, James? Is it because you failed out of the elective Basic Meteorology class because you've legally been deemed mentally incompetent, James? Why do you use your failing out of an elective Basic Meteorology class as the basis to claim yourself to be a "physicist not-a-physicist", James? Do you not understand that physicists are highly educated, whereas you're ignorant and uneducated? What universities did you attend, what were your majors and what was the topic of your Ph.D. thesis, James? You don't have a Ph.D? Then you're not a physicist, James. LOL If, as you claim, the jet stream is a vortex, why is the ride while inside the jet stream so smooth, James? Have you never ridden in an airplane inside a jet stream, James? Is it just that your "sentient jet stream / giant tornado monster with noodly appendages" likes its back scratched by the aircraft, so it doesn't rip the aircraft to shreds, Jim? Do you not understand that once the air going upward through the tornadic funnel reaches the cumulonimbus cloud base above the mesocyclone, it spreads out, thus the tornado is strictly a phenomenon which happens from cloud base to ground? It does *not* go from the ground all the way up through the cloud to the tropopause as you claim, James, and it most certainly does not continue for potentially thousands of miles in the upper troposphere to join the jet stream, which would make air travel deadly. Explain why the jets run easterly, whereas the dry line runs N-S, if the jets are powering the creation of tornadoes. How is a tornado being created hundreds of miles from the edge of the jets, James? Which direction does air flow from a flame, Jim? Up, does it not? That's convection due to temperature-induced density differential, is it not? Which direction does air flow from a flame in zero gravity, James? Radially in all directions, thereby snuffing out the flame due to lack of oxygen. So your claiming that convection doesn't exist means you're further claiming that gravity does not exist, and fire cannot burn for very long before it is smothered due to lack of oxygen. Or were you not aware that convection is a gravity-induced phenomenon due to density differential, James? How are your atmospheric "water droplets" forming if they're plasma, Jim? Do you not know that water droplets *minimize* surface area, James? How are your "plasma not-a-plasma" "water droplets" *maximizing* their surface area as you claim? Do you not know what the definition of "plasma" is, James? How is your "plasma not-a-plasma" (which you have admitted is a hypothetical construct in a failed attempt to lend your claims even a semblance of plausibility) forming if the nuclear binding energy and dissociation energy of water are identical, and thus the water will preferentially dissociate into hydrogen and oxygen unless hit with an extremely energetic laser, Jim? Where is the energy (equivalent to photons of 103.32 nm wavelength, extremely strong ultraviolet, just 3.32 nm away from x-rays... except photons with shorter wavelength than 121 nm are absorbed high above the troposphere because they ionize air so well) coming from in the troposphere to form your "plasma not-a-plasma", Jim? How is the energy to plasmize your "plasma not-a-plasma" not dissociating all water on the planet and killing all life on the planet given that the energy *must* be in the troposphere where nearly all the water is, and where all life is, Jim? Now that it's been proven that water molecule polarity doesn't change upon H bonding (which would have side effects such as random changes in the solvent properties of water... and we know those properties do not randomly change, Jim), and in fact the two spin isomers of water molecules account for the different H bonding strengths which account for evaporation and condensation, do you still contend that your implausible claims are workable, Jim? Why are you not taking your meds, James? ============================================================ Why can't you answer those questions, Tardnado Jim?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-08 19:53 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <59987e0f8ae906a4f0843626c74da6fd@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #656766 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> James 'Tardnado' McGinn, in <news:ffc4b044-dbae-4f74-a0a2-f9fa59be2cab@googlegroups.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Wednesday, April 6, 2016 at 11:22:31 PM UTC-7, > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >>>>>>>>> Obviously not. >>>>>>>> That's right. It's obvious that you're fooling no one. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You claim Coulomb's Law states the exact opposite of what it actually >>>>>>>> states >>>>>>> You are delibately misrepresenting my words. >>>>>> I'm not. In fact, when you were called on your dishonest attempt to >>>>>> twist Coulomb's Law to state exactly the opposite of what it actually >>>>>> states so you could fit it to your delusion, you invented an entirely >>>>>> new "mechanism" of electrostatic attraction which works opposite to >>>>>> Coulomb's Law... >>>>> You >>>> Did your mommy drink like an Irishman when she was pregnant with you, >>>> James? Is that what fucked up your brain? Or did she pass on her >>>> wicked case of Irish syphilis to you and they didn't catch it until >>>> it'd eaten half your brain? Or was your congenital birth defect in the >>>> form of severe mental retardation the result of the usual Irish >>>> incest? LOL >>>> >>>> You fucking boob, you're a joke, a laughingstock. Your name has now >>>> become a verb in scientific circles describing scientific fraud. LOL >>>> >>>> "The IPCC sure McGinn'd that temperature data. It's obvious they >>>> changed it again. What retard thought he could get away with that?" >>>> >>>> I did that to you, James. Yer welcome. >>>> >>>> <snicker> >> James? No reply, James? >>>>> still are dishonestly paraphrasing my words instead of quoting me >>>>> directly. You seem to have no understanding of intellectual honestly. >>>> That's rich, coming from the broken-brained retard trying to twist >>>> scientific concepts to fit his delusion, which he's forced to shift >>>> around as he slaps patches on it to cover up those gaping logic holes, >>>> only to expose even more holes. >> James? No reply, James? >>>>> You don't get it. >>>>> >>>>> You are a child. >>>> You're a mentally ill halfwit with a broken schizo-brain and a >>>> penchant for lying, James. You're a scientific fraud and a worldwide >>>> laughingstock. You're the pathetic clown too stupid to understand >>>> reality. You're the crayon-scribbling mushbrain who's going to >>>> "class-action" kooksoot *science*, *reality*, *electrons*, *photons* >>>> and the *universe* for their part in that giant conspiracy to thwart >>>> your attempts to remodel reality to fit your delusions. >>>> >>>> Where's that kooksoot, James? Did you wear your crayons to a nub, and >>>> mommy won't buy you any more? LOL >>>> >>>> You sad pathetic brain-damaged little halfwit. If you had half the >>>> sense that God gave a fucking garden slug, you'd be embarrassed for >>>> yourself... if you had half the sense that God gave a fucking garden >>>> slug. >> James? No reply, James? >>> Do you now concede that my model harbors no contradiction with >>> Coulomb's Law? Yes? No? >> Your "model not-a-model" is in direct contradiction to Coulomb's Law > Reference? You've tried to twist Coulomb's Law to say the exact opposite of what it actually says, in order to try to twist reality to fit your delusion, James. When called on it, you invented an entirely new "mechanism" that's never been detected by hundreds of thousands of researchers, and which works oppositely to electrostatic attraction. But you're too stupid to realize that in so doing, all H bonding would be negated, and all water would become gaseous-phase... ironically, you deny that water has a gaseous-phase, as well because you deny latent heat... so you're a thoroughly confused moron who is far too uneducated to even know what you don't know. Are you now claiming your own words have no value, James? That your entire delusion is nothing but an elaborate lie to sustain your insanity? These are simple questions, James. Answer the questions, you evasive shitbag. >> and reality, James. You tried to twist Coulomb's Law to state the >> exact opposite of what it actually states, > Reference? Are you now claiming your own words have no value, James? That your entire delusion is nothing but an elaborate lie to sustain your insanity? These are simple questions, James. Answer the questions, you evasive shitbag. >> and when called on it, you >> gave up on that and pulled a whole new "mechanism not-a-mechanism" >> straight from your ass that acted opposite to Coulomb's Law, > Reference? Are you now claiming your own words have no value, James? That your entire delusion is nothing but an elaborate lie to sustain your insanity? These are simple questions, James. Answer the questions, you evasive shitbag. >> not >> realizing that the two would mutually cancel and dissociate all water >> immediately... because you're James Bernard 'Tardnado' McGinn, Jr. of >> Antioch, CA, the broken-brained uneducated moronic halfwit who is too >> insane to recognize reality, let alone acknowledge it, let alone model >> it. >> >> That's why you've had to live your entire life in mommy and daddy's >> basement, James... you'd be a danger to yourself and others if you >> lived independently. You'd chimp out like Rainman on bath salts and >> make the nightly news. I note you've not even attempt to refute this truth, James... are you afraid of the Pandora's Box you'll open by attempting to deny your insanity directly, rather than by proxy via your delusion? These are simple questions, James. Answer the questions, you evasive shitbag. >> Of course, you're headed that way anyway. You're the only one who >> doesn't see that reality, James. Then after an extended stay in the >> Home For The Criminally Insane, you'll be released to shamble from >> street corner to street corner, dirty and disheveled, with a ankle >> bracelet monitor, begging for spare change and muttering to no one in >> particular that you used to be a "physicist not-a-physicist", and >> cursing the letters 'e', 'F', 'N', 'V' and 'W', not necessarily in >> that order. >> >> Or you could submit to the Meteorology Cabal, James. You won't have a >> happy life, or much of a life at all, really, but for the odd jobs you >> do in service to the Meteorology Cabal, you'll have a roof over your >> head, such as it is. >> >> Remember, James, the Meteorology Cabal is always watching you. And >> also remember that we don't exist. This is all just a figment of your >> delusion. You've been pounding on your keyboard for no reason, cursing >> a ghost who haunts only you. >> >> Just take your meds, James. Then everything will be alright. You have >> no reason to suspect that they've been switched out for brainwashing >> drugs. Your own mother wouldn't do that to you. Right, James? >> >> James? >> >> Right, James? >> >> <snicker> Why can't you answer those questions which highlight your psychosis, James Bernard 'Tardnado' McGinn, Jr. of Antioch, CA? -- Here, James, at the very least, try to address those tough questions which spotlight the logical inconsistencies and contradictions inherent in your "theory": ============================================================ Why are you known as Tardnado McGinn, the delusional moronic ignorant uneducated psychotic babbling loon, James? Why have you been legally deemed to be mentally incompetent and a lifelong ward of your parents James, Sr. and Constance, necessitating that you live with your parents because you'd be a danger to yourself if you lived independently, James? Is it your paranoid schizophrenia? Is that why your mommy has to feed you, dress you, wipe your ass and help you to not piss all over yourself? And you call yourself a scientist, James? You're nothing more than a pathetic basement-dwelling schizo-brained delusional loser. Anders Nilsson measured (https://youtu.be/7hGqlEpvODw?t=2156) a spectral peak that was not solid-phase nor liquid-phase water, James. You claim that water remains liquid-phase upon evaporation. What was Anders Nilsson measuring, James? Oh, that's right... gaseous phase water, thereby proving that evaporation entails a phase change, thereby proving latent heat of evaporation exists, thereby *dis*proving a gigantic chunk of your theory, James. You make a supposition that a "plasma not-a-plasma" is created from water due to wind shear, which transports energy throughout the atmosphere via wind driven by that plasma. Where does the energy come from to create your "wind shear" to create your "plasma not-a-plasma" if the "plasma not-a-plasma" cannot exist and thereby "transport energy" by driving that wind to create the "wind shear" which creates your "plasma not-a-plasma", unless there is "wind shear" to begin with, James? Your logic is so twisted you're going in circles. You've created a circulus in probando causality dilemma, which utterly destroys your theory, James. You've yet again slapped a patch on your theory, abandoning Coulomb's Law for a separate "mechanism" by which electrostatic attraction increases with increasing distance. How does your "mechanism" and electrostatic attraction in accordance with Coulomb's Law not mutually cancel, thereby dissociating all water, James? According to your "theory", electrostatic attraction *increases* with distance (in violation of Coulomb's Law), which means that when an electron falls in orbit, it has to *absorb* energy. And that higher energy level somehow translates into a *weaker* electrostatic attraction. Now let's look at the other side of the coin... the electron in orbit would give off energy, rise in orbit, and somehow, that *lower* energy level translates into a *stronger* electrostatic attraction... how's *that* work, James? Explain how you've not just violated the Law of Conservation of Energy on an atomic level. How do the polarity of the electron and the proton cancel if, as even you admit, there is a distance between them as a result of the Pauli Exclusion Principle and the repulsive van der Waals force, KookTard, and once they've cancelled, how is polarity reestablished, and how is that not dissociating the water? If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, why is the boiling point of water anomalously high as compared to other H-bonded hydrides, KookTard? If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, then water's cohesion would also drop. Why does it not do that, KookTard? If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, how is water *not* splitting up into hydroxide and hydronium ions, KookTard? If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, why does water have such a high latent heat of vaporization, a direct result of that same H bonding, KookTard? Of course, being the delusional uneducated moron that you are, you deny that water has any latent heat of vaporization... but you're *so* stupid that you didn't realize that your denial also means you deny that water has a gaseous phase, and that's just retarded. If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, why does water not become much more dense upon fully H bonding, KookTard? How do your "jet stream vortices" travel potentially hundreds of miles away from your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky", without detection by satellite *or* Doppler radar, and know where and when to touch down so they always hit only cumulonimbus clouds, rather than tornadoes randomly appearing out of the clear blue sky or from other types of clouds, James? Is your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky" sentient, James? Go on, Jim, tell us... *why* is there a "boundary" between the troposphere and the stratosphere... we're waiting, Jim... No answer, Jim? Is it because that's where your "sentient jet stream / giant tornado monster with noodly appendages" lives, and it likes it that way, Jim? Do you need your meds, Jim? How does a hot air balloon work, James? No plasma, no giant sentient tornado monster in the jet stream... how does it rise, Jim? Why can't you explain that, James? Why does water freeze from the top down, even if the heat sink is *below* the container of water? That's another question your "theory not-a-theory" can't answer. Why can't you provide the explanation and mathematics to prove your claim that humid air is heavier than dry air, James? Why can't you explain or mathematically model even *one* of your delusions, James? Why can't you get your delusions through the peer-review process, James? Why can't you even get your delusion on a pre-print server, James? Why are there *no* corroborating studies backing up your delusions, James? Why are you shunned by the scientific community, James? Why is your blather on the comments sections of websites being *deleted*, dismissed as the mad barking of a loon, James? Why are you described in the reviews of the "books" you've written as "delusional", "insane", and a "conspiracy theorist", James? Why did you *fail* *out* of an elective Basic Meteorology class, in which they teach the very concepts you're blathering out your lack of education about now, James? Why do you so hate meteorologists, James? Is it because you failed out of the elective Basic Meteorology class because you've legally been deemed mentally incompetent, James? Why do you use your failing out of an elective Basic Meteorology class as the basis to claim yourself to be a "physicist not-a-physicist", James? Do you not understand that physicists are highly educated, whereas you're ignorant and uneducated? What universities did you attend, what were your majors and what was the topic of your Ph.D. thesis, James? You don't have a Ph.D? Then you're not a physicist, James. LOL If, as you claim, the jet stream is a vortex, why is the ride while inside the jet stream so smooth, James? Have you never ridden in an airplane inside a jet stream, James? Is it just that your "sentient jet stream / giant tornado monster with noodly appendages" likes its back scratched by the aircraft, so it doesn't rip the aircraft to shreds, Jim? Do you not understand that once the air going upward through the tornadic funnel reaches the cumulonimbus cloud base above the mesocyclone, it spreads out, thus the tornado is strictly a phenomenon which happens from cloud base to ground? It does *not* go from the ground all the way up through the cloud to the tropopause as you claim, James, and it most certainly does not continue for potentially thousands of miles in the upper troposphere to join the jet stream, which would make air travel deadly. Explain why the jets run easterly, whereas the dry line runs N-S, if the jets are powering the creation of tornadoes. How is a tornado being created hundreds of miles from the edge of the jets, James? Which direction does air flow from a flame, Jim? Up, does it not? That's convection due to temperature-induced density differential, is it not? Which direction does air flow from a flame in zero gravity, James? Radially in all directions, thereby snuffing out the flame due to lack of oxygen. So your claiming that convection doesn't exist means you're further claiming that gravity does not exist, and fire cannot burn for very long before it is smothered due to lack of oxygen. Or were you not aware that convection is a gravity-induced phenomenon due to density differential, James? How are your atmospheric "water droplets" forming if they're plasma, Jim? Do you not know that water droplets *minimize* surface area, James? How are your "plasma not-a-plasma" "water droplets" *maximizing* their surface area as you claim? Do you not know what the definition of "plasma" is, James? How is your "plasma not-a-plasma" (which you have admitted is a hypothetical construct in a failed attempt to lend your claims even a semblance of plausibility) forming if the nuclear binding energy and dissociation energy of water are identical, and thus the water will preferentially dissociate into hydrogen and oxygen unless hit with an extremely energetic laser, Jim? Where is the energy (equivalent to photons of 103.32 nm wavelength, extremely strong ultraviolet, just 3.32 nm away from x-rays... except photons with shorter wavelength than 121 nm are absorbed high above the troposphere because they ionize air so well) coming from in the troposphere to form your "plasma not-a-plasma", Jim? How is the energy to plasmize your "plasma not-a-plasma" not dissociating all water on the planet and killing all life on the planet given that the energy *must* be in the troposphere where nearly all the water is, and where all life is, Jim? Now that it's been proven that water molecule polarity doesn't change upon H bonding (which would have side effects such as random changes in the solvent properties of water... and we know those properties do not randomly change, Jim), and in fact the two spin isomers of water molecules account for the different H bonding strengths which account for evaporation and condensation, do you still contend that your implausible claims are workable, Jim? Why are you not taking your meds, James? ============================================================ Why can't you answer those questions, Tardnado Jim?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-07 08:11 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <296c37938c4d286d70873a73cec33277@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #655395 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> James 'Tardnado' McGinn, in <news:dd32b95f-7b28-4d09-a291-4d79345f1faf@googlegroups.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Tuesday, March 29, 2016 at 10:32:46 AM UTC-7, > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >> James 'Tardnado' McGinn, in >> <news:e326f716-9441-4866-b875-e3a23abb28a3@googlegroups.com> did >> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: >>> On Monday, March 28, 2016 at 10:36:38 PM UTC-7, >>> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >>>> James Bernard 'Tardnado' McGinn, Jr. of Antioch, CA, socked up as >>>> Solving Tornadoes, in >>>> <news:4318ff9a-9c4d-4f20-84cd-5dc418054025@googlegroups.com> did >>>> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: >>>>> On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 11:02:47 PM UTC-7, >>>>> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >>>>>>> Obviously not. >>>>>> That's right. It's obvious that you're fooling no one. >>>>>> >>>>>> You claim Coulomb's Law states the exact opposite of what it actually >>>>>> states >>>>> You are delibately misrepresenting my words. >>>> I'm not. In fact, when you were called on your dishonest attempt to >>>> twist Coulomb's Law to state exactly the opposite of what it actually >>>> states so you could fit it to your delusion, you invented an entirely >>>> new "mechanism" of electrostatic attraction which works opposite to >>>> Coulomb's Law... >>> You >> Did your mommy drink like an Irishman when she was pregnant with you, >> James? Is that what fucked up your brain? Or did she pass on her >> wicked case of Irish syphilis to you and they didn't catch it until >> it'd eaten half your brain? Or was your congenital birth defect in the >> form of severe mental retardation the result of the usual Irish >> incest? LOL >> >> You fucking boob, you're a joke, a laughingstock. Your name has now >> become a verb in scientific circles describing scientific fraud. LOL >> >> "The IPCC sure McGinn'd that temperature data. It's obvious they >> changed it again. What retard thought he could get away with that?" >> >> I did that to you, James. Yer welcome. >> >> <snicker> James? No reply, James? >>> still are dishonestly paraphrasing my words instead of quoting me >>> directly. You seem to have no understanding of intellectual honestly. >> That's rich, coming from the broken-brained retard trying to twist >> scientific concepts to fit his delusion, which he's forced to shift >> around as he slaps patches on it to cover up those gaping logic holes, >> only to expose even more holes. James? No reply, James? >>> You don't get it. >>> >>> You are a child. >> You're a mentally ill halfwit with a broken schizo-brain and a >> penchant for lying, James. You're a scientific fraud and a worldwide >> laughingstock. You're the pathetic clown too stupid to understand >> reality. You're the crayon-scribbling mushbrain who's going to >> "class-action" kooksoot *science*, *reality*, *electrons*, *photons* >> and the *universe* for their part in that giant conspiracy to thwart >> your attempts to remodel reality to fit your delusions. >> >> Where's that kooksoot, James? Did you wear your crayons to a nub, and >> mommy won't buy you any more? LOL >> >> You sad pathetic brain-damaged little halfwit. If you had half the >> sense that God gave a fucking garden slug, you'd be embarrassed for >> yourself... if you had half the sense that God gave a fucking garden >> slug. James? No reply, James? > Do you now concede that my model harbors no contradiction with > Coulomb's Law? Yes? No? Your "model not-a-model" is in direct contradiction to Coulomb's Law and reality, James. You tried to twist Coulomb's Law to state the exact opposite of what it actually states, and when called on it, you gave up on that and pulled a whole new "mechanism not-a-mechanism" straight from your ass that acted opposite to Coulomb's Law, not realizing that the two would mutually cancel and dissociate all water immediately... because you're James Bernard 'Tardnado' McGinn, Jr. of Antioch, CA, the broken-brained uneducated moronic halfwit who is too insane to recognize reality, let alone acknowledge it, let alone model it. That's why you've had to live your entire life in mommy and daddy's basement, James... you'd be a danger to yourself and others if you lived independently. You'd chimp out like Rainman on bath salts and make the nightly news. Of course, you're headed that way anyway. You're the only one who doesn't see that reality, James. Then after an extended stay in the Home For The Criminally Insane, you'll be released to shamble from street corner to street corner, dirty and disheveled, with a ankle bracelet monitor, begging for spare change and muttering to no one in particular that you used to be a "physicist not-a-physicist", and cursing the letters 'e', 'F', 'N', 'V' and 'W', not necessarily in that order. Or you could submit to the Meteorology Cabal, James. You won't have a happy life, or much of a life at all, really, but for the odd jobs you do in service to the Meteorology Cabal, you'll have a roof over your head, such as it is. Remember, James, the Meteorology Cabal is always watching you. And also remember that we don't exist. This is all just a figment of your delusion. You've been pounding on your keyboard for no reason, cursing a ghost who haunts only you. Just take your meds, James. Then everything will be alright. You have no reason to suspect that they've been switched out for brainwashing drugs. Your own mother wouldn't do that to you. Right, James? James? Right, James? <snicker> -- Here, James, at the very least, try to address those tough questions which spotlight the logical inconsistencies and contradictions inherent in your "theory": ============================================================ Why are you known as Tardnado McGinn, the delusional moronic ignorant uneducated psychotic babbling loon, James? Why have you been legally deemed to be mentally incompetent and a lifelong ward of your parents James, Sr. and Constance, necessitating that you live with your parents because you'd be a danger to yourself if you lived independently, James? Is it your paranoid schizophrenia? Is that why your mommy has to feed you, dress you, wipe your ass and help you to not piss all over yourself? And you call yourself a scientist, James? You're nothing more than a pathetic basement-dwelling schizo-brained delusional loser. Anders Nilsson measured (https://youtu.be/7hGqlEpvODw?t=2156) a spectral peak that was not solid-phase nor liquid-phase water, James. You claim that water remains liquid-phase upon evaporation. What was Anders Nilsson measuring, James? Oh, that's right... gaseous phase water, thereby proving that evaporation entails a phase change, thereby proving latent heat of evaporation exists, thereby *dis*proving a gigantic chunk of your theory, James. You make a supposition that a "plasma not-a-plasma" is created from water due to wind shear, which transports energy throughout the atmosphere via wind driven by that plasma. Where does the energy come from to create your "wind shear" to create your "plasma not-a-plasma" if the "plasma not-a-plasma" cannot exist and thereby "transport energy" by driving that wind to create the "wind shear" which creates your "plasma not-a-plasma", unless there is "wind shear" to begin with, James? Your logic is so twisted you're going in circles. You've created a circulus in probando causality dilemma, which utterly destroys your theory, James. You've yet again slapped a patch on your theory, abandoning Coulomb's Law for a separate "mechanism" by which electrostatic attraction increases with increasing distance. How does your "mechanism" and electrostatic attraction in accordance with Coulomb's Law not mutually cancel, thereby dissociating all water, James? According to your "theory", electrostatic attraction *increases* with distance (in violation of Coulomb's Law), which means that when an electron falls in orbit, it has to *absorb* energy. And that higher energy level somehow translates into a *weaker* electrostatic attraction. Now let's look at the other side of the coin... the electron in orbit would give off energy, rise in orbit, and somehow, that *lower* energy level translates into a *stronger* electrostatic attraction... how's *that* work, James? Explain how you've not just violated the Law of Conservation of Energy on an atomic level. How do the polarity of the electron and the proton cancel if, as even you admit, there is a distance between them as a result of the Pauli Exclusion Principle and the repulsive van der Waals force, KookTard, and once they've cancelled, how is polarity reestablished, and how is that not dissociating the water? If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, why is the boiling point of water anomalously high as compared to other H-bonded hydrides, KookTard? If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, then water's cohesion would also drop. Why does it not do that, KookTard? If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, how is water *not* splitting up into hydroxide and hydronium ions, KookTard? If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, why does water have such a high latent heat of vaporization, a direct result of that same H bonding, KookTard? Of course, being the delusional uneducated moron that you are, you deny that water has any latent heat of vaporization... but you're *so* stupid that you didn't realize that your denial also means you deny that water has a gaseous phase, and that's just retarded. If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, why does water not become much more dense upon fully H bonding, KookTard? How do your "jet stream vortices" travel potentially hundreds of miles away from your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky", without detection by satellite *or* Doppler radar, and know where and when to touch down so they always hit only cumulonimbus clouds, rather than tornadoes randomly appearing out of the clear blue sky or from other types of clouds, James? Is your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky" sentient, James? Go on, Jim, tell us... *why* is there a "boundary" between the troposphere and the stratosphere... we're waiting, Jim... No answer, Jim? Is it because that's where your "sentient jet stream / giant tornado monster with noodly appendages" lives, and it likes it that way, Jim? Do you need your meds, Jim? How does a hot air balloon work, James? No plasma, no giant sentient tornado monster in the jet stream... how does it rise, Jim? Why can't you explain that, James? Why does water freeze from the top down, even if the heat sink is *below* the container of water? That's another question your "theory not-a-theory" can't answer. Why can't you provide the explanation and mathematics to prove your claim that humid air is heavier than dry air, James? Why can't you explain or mathematically model even *one* of your delusions, James? Why can't you get your delusions through the peer-review process, James? Why can't you even get your delusion on a pre-print server, James? Why are there *no* corroborating studies backing up your delusions, James? Why are you shunned by the scientific community, James? Why is your blather on the comments sections of websites being *deleted*, dismissed as the mad barking of a loon, James? Why are you described in the reviews of the "books" you've written as "delusional", "insane", and a "conspiracy theorist", James? Why did you *fail* *out* of an elective Basic Meteorology class, in which they teach the very concepts you're blathering out your lack of education about now, James? Why do you so hate meteorologists, James? Is it because you failed out of the elective Basic Meteorology class because you've legally been deemed mentally incompetent, James? Why do you use your failing out of an elective Basic Meteorology class as the basis to claim yourself to be a "physicist not-a-physicist", James? Do you not understand that physicists are highly educated, whereas you're ignorant and uneducated? What universities did you attend, what were your majors and what was the topic of your Ph.D. thesis, James? You don't have a Ph.D? Then you're not a physicist, James. LOL If, as you claim, the jet stream is a vortex, why is the ride while inside the jet stream so smooth, James? Have you never ridden in an airplane inside a jet stream, James? Is it just that your "sentient jet stream / giant tornado monster with noodly appendages" likes its back scratched by the aircraft, so it doesn't rip the aircraft to shreds, Jim? Do you not understand that once the air going upward through the tornadic funnel reaches the cumulonimbus cloud base above the mesocyclone, it spreads out, thus the tornado is strictly a phenomenon which happens from cloud base to ground? It does *not* go from the ground all the way up through the cloud to the tropopause as you claim, James, and it most certainly does not continue for potentially thousands of miles in the upper troposphere to join the jet stream, which would make air travel deadly. Explain why the jets run easterly, whereas the dry line runs N-S, if the jets are powering the creation of tornadoes. How is a tornado being created hundreds of miles from the edge of the jets, James? Which direction does air flow from a flame, Jim? Up, does it not? That's convection due to temperature-induced density differential, is it not? Which direction does air flow from a flame in zero gravity, James? Radially in all directions, thereby snuffing out the flame due to lack of oxygen. So your claiming that convection doesn't exist means you're further claiming that gravity does not exist, and fire cannot burn for very long before it is smothered due to lack of oxygen. Or were you not aware that convection is a gravity-induced phenomenon due to density differential, James? How are your atmospheric "water droplets" forming if they're plasma, Jim? Do you not know that water droplets *minimize* surface area, James? How are your "plasma not-a-plasma" "water droplets" *maximizing* their surface area as you claim? Do you not know what the definition of "plasma" is, James? How is your "plasma not-a-plasma" (which you have admitted is a hypothetical construct in a failed attempt to lend your claims even a semblance of plausibility) forming if the nuclear binding energy and dissociation energy of water are identical, and thus the water will preferentially dissociate into hydrogen and oxygen unless hit with an extremely energetic laser, Jim? Where is the energy (equivalent to photons of 103.32 nm wavelength, extremely strong ultraviolet, just 3.32 nm away from x-rays... except photons with shorter wavelength than 121 nm are absorbed high above the troposphere because they ionize air so well) coming from in the troposphere to form your "plasma not-a-plasma", Jim? How is the energy to plasmize your "plasma not-a-plasma" not dissociating all water on the planet and killing all life on the planet given that the energy *must* be in the troposphere where nearly all the water is, and where all life is, Jim? Now that it's been proven that water molecule polarity doesn't change upon H bonding (which would have side effects such as random changes in the solvent properties of water... and we know those properties do not randomly change, Jim), and in fact the two spin isomers of water molecules account for the different H bonding strengths which account for evaporation and condensation, do you still contend that your implausible claims are workable, Jim? Why are you not taking your meds, James? ============================================================ Why can't you answer those questions, Tardnado Jim?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-08 08:54 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <43614f754b6ad10790ace1c6261a0642@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #656768 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> James 'Tardnado' McGinn, in <news:3030b07d-74cf-47fb-b6cb-6b1fb21627db@googlegroups.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Wednesday, April 6, 2016 at 11:22:31 PM UTC-7, > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >>>>>>>>> Obviously not. >>>>>>>> That's right. It's obvious that you're fooling no one. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You claim Coulomb's Law states the exact opposite of what it actually >>>>>>>> states >>>>>>> You are delibately misrepresenting my words. >>>>>> I'm not. In fact, when you were called on your dishonest attempt to >>>>>> twist Coulomb's Law to state exactly the opposite of what it actually >>>>>> states so you could fit it to your delusion, you invented an entirely >>>>>> new "mechanism" of electrostatic attraction which works opposite to >>>>>> Coulomb's Law... >>>>> You >>>> Did your mommy drink like an Irishman when she was pregnant with you, >>>> James? Is that what fucked up your brain? Or did she pass on her >>>> wicked case of Irish syphilis to you and they didn't catch it until >>>> it'd eaten half your brain? Or was your congenital birth defect in the >>>> form of severe mental retardation the result of the usual Irish >>>> incest? LOL >>>> >>>> You fucking boob, you're a joke, a laughingstock. Your name has now >>>> become a verb in scientific circles describing scientific fraud. LOL >>>> >>>> "The IPCC sure McGinn'd that temperature data. It's obvious they >>>> changed it again. What retard thought he could get away with that?" >>>> >>>> I did that to you, James. Yer welcome. >>>> >>>> <snicker> >> James? No reply, James? >>>>> still are dishonestly paraphrasing my words instead of quoting me >>>>> directly. You seem to have no understanding of intellectual honestly. >>>> That's rich, coming from the broken-brained retard trying to twist >>>> scientific concepts to fit his delusion, which he's forced to shift >>>> around as he slaps patches on it to cover up those gaping logic holes, >>>> only to expose even more holes. >> James? No reply, James? >>>>> You don't get it. >>>>> >>>>> You are a child. >>>> You're a mentally ill halfwit with a broken schizo-brain and a >>>> penchant for lying, James. You're a scientific fraud and a worldwide >>>> laughingstock. You're the pathetic clown too stupid to understand >>>> reality. You're the crayon-scribbling mushbrain who's going to >>>> "class-action" kooksoot *science*, *reality*, *electrons*, *photons* >>>> and the *universe* for their part in that giant conspiracy to thwart >>>> your attempts to remodel reality to fit your delusions. >>>> >>>> Where's that kooksoot, James? Did you wear your crayons to a nub, and >>>> mommy won't buy you any more? LOL >>>> >>>> You sad pathetic brain-damaged little halfwit. If you had half the >>>> sense that God gave a fucking garden slug, you'd be embarrassed for >>>> yourself... if you had half the sense that God gave a fucking garden >>>> slug. >> James? No reply, James? >>> Do you now concede that my model harbors no contradiction with >>> Coulomb's Law? Yes? No? >> Your "model not-a-model" is in direct contradiction to Coulomb's Law >> and reality, James. You tried to twist Coulomb's Law to state the >> exact opposite of what it actually states, and when called on it, you >> gave up on that and pulled a whole new "mechanism not-a-mechanism" >> straight from your ass that acted opposite to Coulomb's Law, not >> realizing that the two would mutually cancel and dissociate all water >> immediately... because you're James Bernard 'Tardnado' McGinn, Jr. of >> Antioch, CA, the broken-brained uneducated moronic halfwit who is too >> insane to recognize reality, let alone acknowledge it, let alone model >> it. >> >> That's why you've had to live your entire life in mommy and daddy's >> basement, James... you'd be a danger to yourself and others if you >> lived independently. You'd chimp out like Rainman on bath salts and >> make the nightly news. >> >> Of course, you're headed that way anyway. You're the only one who >> doesn't see that reality, James. Then after an extended stay in the >> Home For The Criminally Insane, you'll be released to shamble from >> street corner to street corner, dirty and disheveled, with a ankle >> bracelet monitor, begging for spare change and muttering to no one in >> particular that you used to be a "physicist not-a-physicist", and >> cursing the letters 'e', 'F', 'N', 'V' and 'W', not necessarily in >> that order. >> >> Or you could submit to the Meteorology Cabal, James. You won't have a >> happy life, or much of a life at all, really, but for the odd jobs you >> do in service to the Meteorology Cabal, you'll have a roof over your >> head, such as it is. >> >> Remember, James, the Meteorology Cabal is always watching you. And >> also remember that we don't exist. This is all just a figment of your >> delusion. You've been pounding on your keyboard for no reason, cursing >> a ghost who haunts only you. >> >> Just take your meds, James. Then everything will be alright. You have >> no reason to suspect that they've been switched out for brainwashing >> drugs. Your own mother wouldn't do that to you. Right, James? >> >> James? >> >> Right, James? >> >> <snicker> > I can't figure out what you point is, or if you even have one. Sorry. The point is, James, that you cannot win against a far superior force. In effect, you declared war against a nuclear power, while you are armed only with spitwads. On your side, you have delusion, paranoia, schizophrenia, babbling, backpedaling, non sequiturs, evasion and lies. On my side we have control of nearly all of society, centuries of scientific fact, a firm grasp upon reality and the surety that we will rule you morons forever. Why can't you answer those questions which highlight your psychosis, James Bernard 'Tardnado' McGinn, Jr. of Antioch, CA? -- Here, James, at the very least, try to address those tough questions which spotlight the logical inconsistencies and contradictions inherent in your "theory": ============================================================ Why are you known as Tardnado McGinn, the delusional moronic ignorant uneducated psychotic babbling loon, James? Why have you been legally deemed to be mentally incompetent and a lifelong ward of your parents James, Sr. and Constance, necessitating that you live with your parents because you'd be a danger to yourself if you lived independently, James? Is it your paranoid schizophrenia? Is that why your mommy has to feed you, dress you, wipe your ass and help you to not piss all over yourself? And you call yourself a scientist, James? You're nothing more than a pathetic basement-dwelling schizo-brained delusional loser. Anders Nilsson measured (https://youtu.be/7hGqlEpvODw?t=2156) a spectral peak that was not solid-phase nor liquid-phase water, James. You claim that water remains liquid-phase upon evaporation. What was Anders Nilsson measuring, James? Oh, that's right... gaseous phase water, thereby proving that evaporation entails a phase change, thereby proving latent heat of evaporation exists, thereby *dis*proving a gigantic chunk of your theory, James. You make a supposition that a "plasma not-a-plasma" is created from water due to wind shear, which transports energy throughout the atmosphere via wind driven by that plasma. Where does the energy come from to create your "wind shear" to create your "plasma not-a-plasma" if the "plasma not-a-plasma" cannot exist and thereby "transport energy" by driving that wind to create the "wind shear" which creates your "plasma not-a-plasma", unless there is "wind shear" to begin with, James? Your logic is so twisted you're going in circles. You've created a circulus in probando causality dilemma, which utterly destroys your theory, James. You've yet again slapped a patch on your theory, abandoning Coulomb's Law for a separate "mechanism" by which electrostatic attraction increases with increasing distance. How does your "mechanism" and electrostatic attraction in accordance with Coulomb's Law not mutually cancel, thereby dissociating all water, James? According to your "theory", electrostatic attraction *increases* with distance (in violation of Coulomb's Law), which means that when an electron falls in orbit, it has to *absorb* energy. And that higher energy level somehow translates into a *weaker* electrostatic attraction. Now let's look at the other side of the coin... the electron in orbit would give off energy, rise in orbit, and somehow, that *lower* energy level translates into a *stronger* electrostatic attraction... how's *that* work, James? Explain how you've not just violated the Law of Conservation of Energy on an atomic level. How do the polarity of the electron and the proton cancel if, as even you admit, there is a distance between them as a result of the Pauli Exclusion Principle and the repulsive van der Waals force, KookTard, and once they've cancelled, how is polarity reestablished, and how is that not dissociating the water? If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, why is the boiling point of water anomalously high as compared to other H-bonded hydrides, KookTard? If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, then water's cohesion would also drop. Why does it not do that, KookTard? If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, how is water *not* splitting up into hydroxide and hydronium ions, KookTard? If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, why does water have such a high latent heat of vaporization, a direct result of that same H bonding, KookTard? Of course, being the delusional uneducated moron that you are, you deny that water has any latent heat of vaporization... but you're *so* stupid that you didn't realize that your denial also means you deny that water has a gaseous phase, and that's just retarded. If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, why does water not become much more dense upon fully H bonding, KookTard? How do your "jet stream vortices" travel potentially hundreds of miles away from your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky", without detection by satellite *or* Doppler radar, and know where and when to touch down so they always hit only cumulonimbus clouds, rather than tornadoes randomly appearing out of the clear blue sky or from other types of clouds, James? Is your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky" sentient, James? Go on, Jim, tell us... *why* is there a "boundary" between the troposphere and the stratosphere... we're waiting, Jim... No answer, Jim? Is it because that's where your "sentient jet stream / giant tornado monster with noodly appendages" lives, and it likes it that way, Jim? Do you need your meds, Jim? How does a hot air balloon work, James? No plasma, no giant sentient tornado monster in the jet stream... how does it rise, Jim? Why can't you explain that, James? Why does water freeze from the top down, even if the heat sink is *below* the container of water? That's another question your "theory not-a-theory" can't answer. Why can't you provide the explanation and mathematics to prove your claim that humid air is heavier than dry air, James? Why can't you explain or mathematically model even *one* of your delusions, James? Why can't you get your delusions through the peer-review process, James? Why can't you even get your delusion on a pre-print server, James? Why are there *no* corroborating studies backing up your delusions, James? Why are you shunned by the scientific community, James? Why is your blather on the comments sections of websites being *deleted*, dismissed as the mad barking of a loon, James? Why are you described in the reviews of the "books" you've written as "delusional", "insane", and a "conspiracy theorist", James? Why did you *fail* *out* of an elective Basic Meteorology class, in which they teach the very concepts you're blathering out your lack of education about now, James? Why do you so hate meteorologists, James? Is it because you failed out of the elective Basic Meteorology class because you've legally been deemed mentally incompetent, James? Why do you use your failing out of an elective Basic Meteorology class as the basis to claim yourself to be a "physicist not-a-physicist", James? Do you not understand that physicists are highly educated, whereas you're ignorant and uneducated? What universities did you attend, what were your majors and what was the topic of your Ph.D. thesis, James? You don't have a Ph.D? Then you're not a physicist, James. LOL If, as you claim, the jet stream is a vortex, why is the ride while inside the jet stream so smooth, James? Have you never ridden in an airplane inside a jet stream, James? Is it just that your "sentient jet stream / giant tornado monster with noodly appendages" likes its back scratched by the aircraft, so it doesn't rip the aircraft to shreds, Jim? Do you not understand that once the air going upward through the tornadic funnel reaches the cumulonimbus cloud base above the mesocyclone, it spreads out, thus the tornado is strictly a phenomenon which happens from cloud base to ground? It does *not* go from the ground all the way up through the cloud to the tropopause as you claim, James, and it most certainly does not continue for potentially thousands of miles in the upper troposphere to join the jet stream, which would make air travel deadly. Explain why the jets run easterly, whereas the dry line runs N-S, if the jets are powering the creation of tornadoes. How is a tornado being created hundreds of miles from the edge of the jets, James? Which direction does air flow from a flame, Jim? Up, does it not? That's convection due to temperature-induced density differential, is it not? Which direction does air flow from a flame in zero gravity, James? Radially in all directions, thereby snuffing out the flame due to lack of oxygen. So your claiming that convection doesn't exist means you're further claiming that gravity does not exist, and fire cannot burn for very long before it is smothered due to lack of oxygen. Or were you not aware that convection is a gravity-induced phenomenon due to density differential, James? How are your atmospheric "water droplets" forming if they're plasma, Jim? Do you not know that water droplets *minimize* surface area, James? How are your "plasma not-a-plasma" "water droplets" *maximizing* their surface area as you claim? Do you not know what the definition of "plasma" is, James? How is your "plasma not-a-plasma" (which you have admitted is a hypothetical construct in a failed attempt to lend your claims even a semblance of plausibility) forming if the nuclear binding energy and dissociation energy of water are identical, and thus the water will preferentially dissociate into hydrogen and oxygen unless hit with an extremely energetic laser, Jim? Where is the energy (equivalent to photons of 103.32 nm wavelength, extremely strong ultraviolet, just 3.32 nm away from x-rays... except photons with shorter wavelength than 121 nm are absorbed high above the troposphere because they ionize air so well) coming from in the troposphere to form your "plasma not-a-plasma", Jim? How is the energy to plasmize your "plasma not-a-plasma" not dissociating all water on the planet and killing all life on the planet given that the energy *must* be in the troposphere where nearly all the water is, and where all life is, Jim? Now that it's been proven that water molecule polarity doesn't change upon H bonding (which would have side effects such as random changes in the solvent properties of water... and we know those properties do not randomly change, Jim), and in fact the two spin isomers of water molecules account for the different H bonding strengths which account for evaporation and condensation, do you still contend that your implausible claims are workable, Jim? Why are you not taking your meds, James? ============================================================ Why can't you answer those questions, Tardnado Jim?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-09 07:11 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <b7c686ff53ec524fff5571fc7bcbc0f3@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #656978 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> James Bernard 'Tardnado' McGinn, Jr. of Antioch, CA, socked up as Solving Tornadoes, in <news:61e7a465-89a7-4b29-94be-1287fcd9d26f@googlegroups.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Friday, April 8, 2016 at 12:05:43 AM UTC-7, > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Obviously not. >>>>>>>>>> That's right. It's obvious that you're fooling no one. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You claim Coulomb's Law states the exact opposite of what it actually >>>>>>>>>> states >>>>>>>>> You are delibately misrepresenting my words. >>>>>>>> I'm not. In fact, when you were called on your dishonest attempt to >>>>>>>> twist Coulomb's Law to state exactly the opposite of what it actually >>>>>>>> states so you could fit it to your delusion, you invented an entirely >>>>>>>> new "mechanism" of electrostatic attraction which works opposite to >>>>>>>> Coulomb's Law... >>>>>>> You >>>>>> Did your mommy drink like an Irishman when she was pregnant with you, >>>>>> James? Is that what fucked up your brain? Or did she pass on her >>>>>> wicked case of Irish syphilis to you and they didn't catch it until >>>>>> it'd eaten half your brain? Or was your congenital birth defect in the >>>>>> form of severe mental retardation the result of the usual Irish >>>>>> incest? LOL >>>>>> >>>>>> You fucking boob, you're a joke, a laughingstock. Your name has now >>>>>> become a verb in scientific circles describing scientific fraud. LOL >>>>>> >>>>>> "The IPCC sure McGinn'd that temperature data. It's obvious they >>>>>> changed it again. What retard thought he could get away with that?" >>>>>> >>>>>> I did that to you, James. Yer welcome. >>>>>> >>>>>> <snicker> >>>> James? No reply, James? >>>>>>> still are dishonestly paraphrasing my words instead of quoting me >>>>>>> directly. You seem to have no understanding of intellectual honestly. >>>>>> That's rich, coming from the broken-brained retard trying to twist >>>>>> scientific concepts to fit his delusion, which he's forced to shift >>>>>> around as he slaps patches on it to cover up those gaping logic holes, >>>>>> only to expose even more holes. >>>> James? No reply, James? >>>>>>> You don't get it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You are a child. >>>>>> You're a mentally ill halfwit with a broken schizo-brain and a >>>>>> penchant for lying, James. You're a scientific fraud and a worldwide >>>>>> laughingstock. You're the pathetic clown too stupid to understand >>>>>> reality. You're the crayon-scribbling mushbrain who's going to >>>>>> "class-action" kooksoot *science*, *reality*, *electrons*, *photons* >>>>>> and the *universe* for their part in that giant conspiracy to thwart >>>>>> your attempts to remodel reality to fit your delusions. >>>>>> >>>>>> Where's that kooksoot, James? Did you wear your crayons to a nub, and >>>>>> mommy won't buy you any more? LOL >>>>>> >>>>>> You sad pathetic brain-damaged little halfwit. If you had half the >>>>>> sense that God gave a fucking garden slug, you'd be embarrassed for >>>>>> yourself... if you had half the sense that God gave a fucking garden >>>>>> slug. >>>> James? No reply, James? >>>>> Do you now concede that my model harbors no contradiction with >>>>> Coulomb's Law? Yes? No? >>>> Your "model not-a-model" is in direct contradiction to Coulomb's Law >>>> and reality, James. You tried to twist Coulomb's Law to state the >>>> exact opposite of what it actually states, and when called on it, you >>>> gave up on that and pulled a whole new "mechanism not-a-mechanism" >>>> straight from your ass that acted opposite to Coulomb's Law, not >>>> realizing that the two would mutually cancel and dissociate all water >>>> immediately... because you're James Bernard 'Tardnado' McGinn, Jr. of >>>> Antioch, CA, the broken-brained uneducated moronic halfwit who is too >>>> insane to recognize reality, let alone acknowledge it, let alone model >>>> it. >>>> >>>> That's why you've had to live your entire life in mommy and daddy's >>>> basement, James... you'd be a danger to yourself and others if you >>>> lived independently. You'd chimp out like Rainman on bath salts and >>>> make the nightly news. >>>> >>>> Of course, you're headed that way anyway. You're the only one who >>>> doesn't see that reality, James. Then after an extended stay in the >>>> Home For The Criminally Insane, you'll be released to shamble from >>>> street corner to street corner, dirty and disheveled, with a ankle >>>> bracelet monitor, begging for spare change and muttering to no one in >>>> particular that you used to be a "physicist not-a-physicist", and >>>> cursing the letters 'e', 'F', 'N', 'V' and 'W', not necessarily in >>>> that order. >>>> >>>> Or you could submit to the Meteorology Cabal, James. You won't have a >>>> happy life, or much of a life at all, really, but for the odd jobs you >>>> do in service to the Meteorology Cabal, you'll have a roof over your >>>> head, such as it is. >>>> >>>> Remember, James, the Meteorology Cabal is always watching you. And >>>> also remember that we don't exist. This is all just a figment of your >>>> delusion. You've been pounding on your keyboard for no reason, cursing >>>> a ghost who haunts only you. >>>> >>>> Just take your meds, James. Then everything will be alright. You have >>>> no reason to suspect that they've been switched out for brainwashing >>>> drugs. Your own mother wouldn't do that to you. Right, James? >>>> >>>> James? >>>> >>>> Right, James? >>>> >>>> <snicker> >>> I can't figure out what you point is, or if you even have one. Sorry. >> The point is, James, that you cannot win against a far superior force. >> In effect, you declared war against a nuclear power, while you are >> armed only with spitwads. >> >> On your side, you have delusion, paranoia, schizophrenia, babbling, >> backpedaling, non sequiturs, evasion and lies. >> >> On my side we have control of nearly all of society, centuries of >> scientific fact, a firm grasp upon reality and the surety that we will >> rule you morons forever. > I think you've done as good as possible to demonstrate the validity of > meteorology's storm theory. In the future, when people ask me to present an > aggregation of the best evidence to support the current paradigm of > meteorology's storm theory I am going to point them to your posts. Because > here's the thing. Meteorologists won't do what you did. They know it's > futile. They know that any attempt to demonstrate the validity of their > understanding of storms (especially with respect to their characterization of > the role of water) will only expose it is absurdly flawed. > > I also think you've done as good as is possible to dispute my theoretical > thinking. Of course you are extremely scattered and desperate. But people will > see through that and realize that you actually made some effort. Again, and > for the same reasons, this is not something meteorologists would ever do. > > Thank you for your participation. You've been a big help. Your evasion of proving proof of your delusions stands as your admission to defeat, James. And given that you've spammed your evasion multiple times, this represents a new low you've sunk to. Why can't you answer those questions which highlight your psychosis, James Bernard 'Tardnado' McGinn, Jr. of Antioch, CA? -- Here, James, at the very least, try to address those tough questions which spotlight the logical inconsistencies and contradictions inherent in your "theory": ============================================================ Why are you known as Tardnado McGinn, the delusional moronic ignorant uneducated psychotic babbling loon, James? Why have you been legally deemed to be mentally incompetent and a lifelong ward of your parents James, Sr. and Constance, necessitating that you live with your parents because you'd be a danger to yourself if you lived independently, James? Is it your paranoid schizophrenia? Is that why your mommy has to feed you, dress you, wipe your ass and help you to not piss all over yourself? And you call yourself a scientist, James? You're nothing more than a pathetic basement-dwelling schizo-brained delusional loser. Anders Nilsson measured (https://youtu.be/7hGqlEpvODw?t=2156) a spectral peak that was not solid-phase nor liquid-phase water, James. You claim that water remains liquid-phase upon evaporation. What was Anders Nilsson measuring, James? Oh, that's right... gaseous phase water, thereby proving that evaporation entails a phase change, thereby proving latent heat of evaporation exists, thereby *dis*proving a gigantic chunk of your theory, James. You make a supposition that a "plasma not-a-plasma" is created from water due to wind shear, which transports energy throughout the atmosphere via wind driven by that plasma. Where does the energy come from to create your "wind shear" to create your "plasma not-a-plasma" if the "plasma not-a-plasma" cannot exist and thereby "transport energy" by driving that wind to create the "wind shear" which creates your "plasma not-a-plasma", unless there is "wind shear" to begin with, James? Your logic is so twisted you're going in circles. You've created a circulus in probando causality dilemma, which utterly destroys your theory, James. You've yet again slapped a patch on your theory, abandoning Coulomb's Law for a separate "mechanism" by which electrostatic attraction increases with increasing distance. How does your "mechanism" and electrostatic attraction in accordance with Coulomb's Law not mutually cancel, thereby dissociating all water, James? According to your "theory", electrostatic attraction *increases* with distance (in violation of Coulomb's Law), which means that when an electron falls in orbit, it has to *absorb* energy. And that higher energy level somehow translates into a *weaker* electrostatic attraction. Now let's look at the other side of the coin... the electron in orbit would give off energy, rise in orbit, and somehow, that *lower* energy level translates into a *stronger* electrostatic attraction... how's *that* work, James? Explain how you've not just violated the Law of Conservation of Energy on an atomic level. How do the polarity of the electron and the proton cancel if, as even you admit, there is a distance between them as a result of the Pauli Exclusion Principle and the repulsive van der Waals force, KookTard, and once they've cancelled, how is polarity reestablished, and how is that not dissociating the water? If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, why is the boiling point of water anomalously high as compared to other H-bonded hydrides, KookTard? If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, then water's cohesion would also drop. Why does it not do that, KookTard? If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, how is water *not* splitting up into hydroxide and hydronium ions, KookTard? If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, why does water have such a high latent heat of vaporization, a direct result of that same H bonding, KookTard? Of course, being the delusional uneducated moron that you are, you deny that water has any latent heat of vaporization... but you're *so* stupid that you didn't realize that your denial also means you deny that water has a gaseous phase, and that's just retarded. If water molecule polarity dropped upon H bonding, why does water not become much more dense upon fully H bonding, KookTard? How do your "jet stream vortices" travel potentially hundreds of miles away from your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky", without detection by satellite *or* Doppler radar, and know where and when to touch down so they always hit only cumulonimbus clouds, rather than tornadoes randomly appearing out of the clear blue sky or from other types of clouds, James? Is your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky" sentient, James? Go on, Jim, tell us... *why* is there a "boundary" between the troposphere and the stratosphere... we're waiting, Jim... No answer, Jim? Is it because that's where your "sentient jet stream / giant tornado monster with noodly appendages" lives, and it likes it that way, Jim? Do you need your meds, Jim? How does a hot air balloon work, James? No plasma, no giant sentient tornado monster in the jet stream... how does it rise, Jim? Why can't you explain that, James? Why does water freeze from the top down, even if the heat sink is *below* the container of water? That's another question your "theory not-a-theory" can't answer. Why can't you provide the explanation and mathematics to prove your claim that humid air is heavier than dry air, James? Why can't you explain or mathematically model even *one* of your delusions, James? Why can't you get your delusions through the peer-review process, James? Why can't you even get your delusion on a pre-print server, James? Why are there *no* corroborating studies backing up your delusions, James? Why are you shunned by the scientific community, James? Why is your blather on the comments sections of websites being *deleted*, dismissed as the mad barking of a loon, James? Why are you described in the reviews of the "books" you've written as "delusional", "insane", and a "conspiracy theorist", James? Why did you *fail* *out* of an elective Basic Meteorology class, in which they teach the very concepts you're blathering out your lack of education about now, James? Why do you so hate meteorologists, James? Is it because you failed out of the elective Basic Meteorology class because you've legally been deemed mentally incompetent, James? Why do you use your failing out of an elective Basic Meteorology class as the basis to claim yourself to be a "physicist not-a-physicist", James? Do you not understand that physicists are highly educated, whereas you're ignorant and uneducated? What universities did you attend, what were your majors and what was the topic of your Ph.D. thesis, James? You don't have a Ph.D? Then you're not a physicist, James. LOL If, as you claim, the jet stream is a vortex, why is the ride while inside the jet stream so smooth, James? Have you never ridden in an airplane inside a jet stream, James? Is it just that your "sentient jet stream / giant tornado monster with noodly appendages" likes its back scratched by the aircraft, so it doesn't rip the aircraft to shreds, Jim? Do you not understand that once the air going upward through the tornadic funnel reaches the cumulonimbus cloud base above the mesocyclone, it spreads out, thus the tornado is strictly a phenomenon which happens from cloud base to ground? It does *not* go from the ground all the way up through the cloud to the tropopause as you claim, James, and it most certainly does not continue for potentially thousands of miles in the upper troposphere to join the jet stream, which would make air travel deadly. Explain why the jets run easterly, whereas the dry line runs N-S, if the jets are powering the creation of tornadoes. How is a tornado being created hundreds of miles from the edge of the jets, James? Which direction does air flow from a flame, Jim? Up, does it not? That's convection due to temperature-induced density differential, is it not? Which direction does air flow from a flame in zero gravity, James? Radially in all directions, thereby snuffing out the flame due to lack of oxygen. So your claiming that convection doesn't exist means you're further claiming that gravity does not exist, and fire cannot burn for very long before it is smothered due to lack of oxygen. Or were you not aware that convection is a gravity-induced phenomenon due to density differential, James? How are your atmospheric "water droplets" forming if they're plasma, Jim? Do you not know that water droplets *minimize* surface area, James? How are your "plasma not-a-plasma" "water droplets" *maximizing* their surface area as you claim? Do you not know what the definition of "plasma" is, James? How is your "plasma not-a-plasma" (which you have admitted is a hypothetical construct in a failed attempt to lend your claims even a semblance of plausibility) forming if the nuclear binding energy and dissociation energy of water are identical, and thus the water will preferentially dissociate into hydrogen and oxygen unless hit with an extremely energetic laser, Jim? Where is the energy (equivalent to photons of 103.32 nm wavelength, extremely strong ultraviolet, just 3.32 nm away from x-rays... except photons with shorter wavelength than 121 nm are absorbed high above the troposphere because they ionize air so well) coming from in the troposphere to form your "plasma not-a-plasma", Jim? How is the energy to plasmize your "plasma not-a-plasma" not dissociating all water on the planet and killing all life on the planet given that the energy *must* be in the troposphere where nearly all the water is, and where all life is, Jim? Now that it's been proven that water molecule polarity doesn't change upon H bonding (which would have side effects such as random changes in the solvent properties of water... and we know those properties do not randomly change, Jim), and in fact the two spin isomers of water molecules account for the different H bonding strengths which account for evaporation and condensation, do you still contend that your implausible claims are workable, Jim? Why are you not taking your meds, James? ============================================================ Why can't you answer those questions, Tardnado Jim?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-29 08:07 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <3acfa5d289249423ad7487367a853852@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #654505 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> James Bernard 'Tardnado' McGinn, Jr. of Antioch, CA, socked up as Solving Tornadoes, in <news:53166b66-2cbf-403d-a7ff-5e9a33d2c1d6@googlegroups.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 11:02:47 PM UTC-7, > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >> James Bernard 'Tardnado' McGinn, Jr. of Antioch, CA, socked up as >> Solving Tornadoes, in >> <news:f8d51603-6084-44bd-bede-29faf0d5b1db@googlegroups.com> did >> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: >>> On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 11:29:37 AM UTC-7, >>> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: >>>>> Right. And if there is no electrostatic attraction . . . then . . . >>>> It cannot decrease by the inverse square of distance and >>>> simultaneously increase by the square of distance, James. >>> Answer my question. >> I just did. Your being too retarded and insane to understand the >> answer is no one's fault but your own, Tardnado. I'd tell you to >> educate yourself, but you living at home with mommy and daddy means >> they're paying the bills, and they gave up on paying to educate your >> moronic ignorant insane ass long ago. LOL > You won't answer because your point is based on maintaining a > deceptive premise. I did answer but you won't accept reality because your delusional blather is predicated upon maintaining a deceptive premise which you've already retracted, because you're a scientific fraud and a laughingstock, James. James Bernard 'Tardnado' McGinn dribbled: Message-ID: <3a52e2f1a86d44a43a939ee435645e09@dizum.com> ======================================================== > Retracted: > Polarity is a variable. And the mechanism that alters (reduces) > the polarity of H2O molecules is the completion of hydrogen > bonds with adjoining water molecules. ======================================================== James Bernard 'Tardnado' McGinn dribbled: Message-ID: <3a52e2f1a86d44a43a939ee435645e09@dizum.com> ======================================================== > In my post entitled Conservation of Energy in Earth's > Atmosphere I describe how the spinning of water > droplets/clusters--a direct result of wind shear--causes > these droplets to elongate into chains of partially > reactivated H2O molecules, effectuating a plasma with > structural integrity. It is important to note that > without the concept that is the subject of this post > (the Polarity Neutralization Implication of Hydrogen > Bonds Between Water Molecules and Groups Thereof) this > would not be possible. ======================================================== Thus, without your "variable polarity of the water molecule" claim (now retracted by you), your "plasma not-a-plasma" claim falls, by your own admission. And without your "plasma not-a-plasma" claim, your "boundaries and structures" which you claim that "plasma not-a-plasma" forms which drives the winds. Thus your entire "theory not-a-theory" just came crashing to the ground. That's what happens when you build your "theory not-a-theory" like a Jenga tower of lies and suppositions, James. Yet again, you've destroyed your moronic theory in trying to slap patches on it so you can writhe your way out of being proven wrong. You're too ignorant, insane and uneducated to acknowledge or understand reality, let alone model it, Tardnado. LOL Thanks for playing, but you lose. That's reality, James. Deal with it. Tardnado. LOL Your sanity is cracking under the weight of all those unanswered questions, James. I told you, the longer you run from reality, the worse it'll get for you... and we've only just begun. Why have you been legally deemed to be mentally incompetent and a lifelong ward of your parents James, Sr. and Constance, necessitating that you live with your parents because you'd be a danger to yourself if you lived independently, James? Is it your paranoid schizophrenia? Is that why your mommy has to feed you, dress you, wipe your ass and help you to not piss all over yourself? And you call yourself a scientist, James? You're nothing more than a pathetic basement-dwelling schizo-brained delusional loser. How does a hot air balloon work, James? No plasma, no giant sentient tornado monster in the jet stream... how does it rise, Jim? Why can't you explain that, James? Why can't you provide the explanation and mathematics to prove your claim that humid air is heavier than dry air, James? Why can't you explain or mathematically model even *one* of your delusions, James? Why can't you get your delusions through the peer-review process, James? Why are there *no* corroborating studies backing up your delusions, James? Why is your blather on the comments sections of websites being *deleted*, dismissed as the mad barking of a loon, James? Why are you described in the reviews of the "books" you've written as "delusional", "insane", and a "conspiracy theorist", James? Why did you *fail* *out* of an elective Basic Meteorology class, in which they teach the very concepts you're blathering out your lack of education about now, James? Why do you so hate meteorologists, James? Is it because you failed out of the elective Basic Meteorology class because you've legally been deemed mentally incompetent, James? Why do you use your failing out of an elective Basic Meteorology class as the basis to claim yourself to be a "physicist not-a-physicist", James? Do you not understand that physicists are highly educated, whereas you're ignorant and uneducated? What universities did you attend, what were your majors and what was the topic of your Ph.D. thesis, James? Why are you not taking your meds, James? Why are you *still* running away from answering those tough questions in my .sig which highlight the logical inconsistencies and contradictions in your moronic "theory not-a-theory", James? -- Here, James, at the very least, try to address those tough questions which spotlight the logical inconsistencies and contradictions inherent in your "theory": ============================================================ Anders Nilsson measured (https://youtu.be/7hGqlEpvODw?t=2156) a spectral peak that was not solid-phase nor liquid-phase water, James. You claim that water remains liquid-phase upon evaporation. What was Anders Nilsson measuring, James? Oh, that's right... gaseous phase water, thereby proving that evaporation entails a phase change, thereby proving latent heat of evaporation exists, thereby *dis*proving a gigantic chunk of your theory, James. You make a supposition that a "plasma not-a-plasma" is created from water due to wind shear, which transports energy throughout the atmosphere via wind driven by that plasma. Where does the energy come from to create your "wind shear" to create your "plasma not-a-plasma" if the "plasma not-a-plasma" cannot exist and thereby "transport energy" by driving that wind to create the "wind shear" which creates your "plasma not-a-plasma", unless there is "wind shear" to begin with, James? Your logic is so twisted you're going in circles. You've created a circulus in probando causality dilemma, which utterly destroys your theory, James. According to your "theory", electrostatic attraction *increases* with distance (in violation of Coulomb's Law), which means that when an electron falls in orbit, it has to *absorb* energy. And that higher energy level somehow translates into a *weaker* electrostatic attraction. Now let's look at the other side of the coin... the electron in orbit would give off energy, rise in orbit, and somehow, that *lower* energy level translates into a *stronger* electrostatic attraction... how's *that* work, James? Explain how you've not just violated the Law of Conservation of Energy on an atomic level. How do your "jet stream vortices" travel potentially hundreds of miles away from your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky", without detection by satellite *or* Doppler radar, and know where and when to touch down so they always hit only cumulonimbus clouds, rather than tornadoes randomly appearing out of the clear blue sky or from other types of clouds, James? Is your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky" sentient, James? Go on, Jim, tell us... *why* is there a "boundary" between the troposphere and the stratosphere... we're waiting, Jim... No answer, Jim? Is it because that's where your "sentient jet stream / giant tornado monster with noodly appendages" lives, and it likes it that way, Jim? Do you need your meds, Jim? If, as you claim, the jet stream is a vortex, why is the ride while inside the jet stream so smooth, James? Have you never ridden in an airplane inside a jet stream, James? Is it just that your "sentient jet stream / giant tornado monster with noodly appendages" likes its back scratched by the aircraft, so it doesn't rip the aircraft to shreds, Jim? Do you not understand that once the air going upward through the tornadic funnel reaches the cumulonimbus cloud base above the mesocyclone, it spreads out, thus the tornado is strictly a phenomenon which happens from cloud base to ground? It does *not* go from the ground all the way up through the cloud to the tropopause as you claim, James, and it most certainly does not continue for potentially hundreds of miles in the upper troposphere to join the jet stream, which would make air travel deadly. Explain why the jets run easterly, whereas the dry line runs N-S, if the jets are powering the creation of tornadoes. How is a tornado being created hundreds of miles from the edge of the jets, James? Which direction does air flow from a flame, Jim? Up, does it not? That's convection due to temperature-induced density differential, is it not? Which direction does air flow from a flame in zero gravity, James? Radially in all directions, thereby snuffing out the flame due to lack of oxygen. So your claiming that convection doesn't exist means you're further claiming that gravity does not exist, and fire cannot burn for very long before it is smothered due to lack of oxygen. Or were you not aware that convection is a gravity-induced phenomenon due to density differential, James? How does a hot air balloon rise, Jim? That's due to air density differential due to temperature differential, is it not? That less-dense air is convecting upward. Do you deny this, Jim? Is your giant sentient sky tornado monster stretching one of its noodly appendages down and gently lifting the hot air balloon, Jim? How are your atmospheric "water droplets" forming if they're plasma, Jim? Do you not know what the definition of "plasma" is, James? How is your "plasma not-a-plasma" (which you have admitted is a hypothetical construct in a failed attempt to lend your claims even a semblance of plausibility) forming if the nuclear binding energy and dissociation energy of water are identical, and thus the water will preferentially dissociate into hydrogen and oxygen unless hit with an extremely energetic laser, Jim? Where is the energy (equivalent to photons of 103.32 nm wavelength, extremely strong ultraviolet, just 3.32 nm away from x-rays... except photons with shorter wavelength than 121 nm are absorbed high above the troposphere because they ionize air so well) coming from in the troposphere to form your "plasma not-a-plasma", Jim? How is the energy to plasmize your "plasma not-a-plasma" not dissociating all water on the planet and killing all life on the planet given that the energy *must* be in the troposphere where nearly all the water is, and where all life is, Jim? Now that it's been proven that water molecule polarity doesn't change upon H bonding (which would have side effects such as random changes in the solvent properties of water... and we know those properties do not randomly change, Jim), and in fact the two spin isomers of water molecules account for the different H bonding strengths which account for evaporation and condensation, do you still contend that your implausible claims are workable, Jim? ============================================================ Why can't you answer those questions, Jim?
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4]
Back to top | Article view | alt.usenet.kooks
csiph-web