Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.usenet.kooks > #630122 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-17 18:30 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-02-18 06:52 +0100 |
| Articles | 11 on this page of 131 — 10 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.usenet.kooks
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-17 18:30 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-17 12:55 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 07:20 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 09:45 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 07:58 -0700
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 10:17 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-19 03:27 +0800
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 15:03 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 05:20 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-20 22:37 +0800
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 20:10 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-20 15:22 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 06:09 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-20 23:19 +0800
Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-20 08:47 -0700
Re: 3 phase teaser "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-20 09:51 -0800
Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-20 10:55 -0700
Re: 3 phase teaser "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-20 11:00 -0800
Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-20 12:38 -0700
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 20:05 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-20 12:38 -0700
Re: 3 phase teaser snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-20 22:05 +0000
Re: 3 phase teaser Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-21 14:23 +0800
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 06:45 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-22 16:15 +0800
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 20:01 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-23 03:42 +0800
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-22 15:42 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 07:27 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-23 01:27 -0700
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 09:55 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-23 09:54 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 17:10 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-23 11:56 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 22:45 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-23 16:56 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-24 06:38 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-27 02:14 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-26 23:50 -0800
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-27 20:28 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-27 12:53 -0700
Re: 3 phase teaser kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-28 02:32 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-28 19:05 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-24 00:48 +0800
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-23 12:02 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-24 01:18 +0800
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-23 12:54 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-23 11:01 -0700
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-23 13:03 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 22:30 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-23 14:48 -0700
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-23 16:53 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-23 16:28 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-23 16:31 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 22:30 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-23 16:52 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-23 16:55 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-24 07:07 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-24 20:39 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-25 10:36 +0800
Re: 3 phase teaser "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-24 19:05 -0800
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-24 22:28 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-24 19:42 -0800
Re: 3 phase teaser binky feel good <julianfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2016-02-24 19:57 -0800
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-24 23:01 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser binky feel good <julianfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2016-02-24 20:10 -0800
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-24 23:15 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-25 08:19 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-26 00:30 +0800
Re: 3 phase teaser "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-25 09:04 -0800
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-25 19:26 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-25 12:07 -0700
Re: 3 phase teaser "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-24 21:04 -0800
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-25 00:16 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-24 21:46 -0800
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-25 02:10 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-25 08:24 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-25 03:12 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-25 18:05 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-25 13:03 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-26 06:28 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-25 12:08 -0700
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-25 15:01 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-25 04:14 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-25 18:00 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-25 13:01 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-26 06:44 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-24 00:46 +0800
Re: 3 phase teaser "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-23 12:42 -0800
Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-23 13:48 -0700
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-23 16:14 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-24 07:47 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-23 23:43 -0800
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-24 18:48 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-24 13:03 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-25 10:12 +0800
Re: 3 phase teaser "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-24 19:13 -0800
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-24 22:23 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-25 07:06 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 22:35 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-23 14:50 -0700
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-24 18:53 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-24 11:52 -0700
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 07:27 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-23 01:26 -0700
Re: 3 phase teaser "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-23 00:32 -0800
Re: 3 phase teaser Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-24 00:13 +0800
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-23 11:14 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 20:19 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-23 12:30 -0800
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 19:42 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-24 03:19 +0800
Re: 3 phase teaser snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-23 19:36 +0000
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-23 14:47 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-24 04:19 +0800
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-24 07:37 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 22:03 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 14:20 -0700
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 18:13 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 16:22 -0700
Re: 3 phase teaser "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 16:24 -0700
Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 16:33 -0700
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 18:37 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-19 05:43 +0000
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-19 11:15 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-19 10:16 -0700
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-19 12:29 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 05:48 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-17 15:49 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-17 13:26 -0800
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 06:52 +0100
Page 7 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7]
| From | "%" <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-18 16:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <9629bv.h43.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #630473 |
Skeeter wrote: > On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 18:13:24 -0500, "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder > living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), > socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" > <root@127.0.0.1> wrote: > >> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 16:03:43 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote >> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >> >>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >>> >>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka >>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop >>> Jockey), socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in >>> <news:op.yc09xkpxtm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first >>> into the wood chipper again: >>> >>>> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 01:20:45 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood >>>> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >>> >>>>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka >>>>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop >>>>> Jockey), socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in >>>>> <news:op.yczn3ab2tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head >>>>> first into the wood chipper again: >>> >>>>>> <looks at subject> >>>>>> >>>>>> okay, so now please go "sum" any two of the 3 phases of standard >>>>>> 3-phase >>>>>> power and tell me how many volts potential it is at any instant, >>>>>> k0oky. >>>>>> then "sum" all three. show us the sums. >>> >>>>> "at any instant" LOL >>>>> >>>>> You mean the time-varying instantaneous voltage, which varies on >>>>> each hot leg? Moron. LOL >>>>> >>>>> V(L1-N) = sin(2*pi*f*t)*Vp >>>>> V(L2-N) = sin((2*pi*f*t+((4/3)*pi)*Vp >>>>> V(L3-N) = sin((2*pi*f*t+((2/3)*pi)*Vp >>> >>>> hey, those equations look very familiar. you just left out the >>>> definitions of f=60 and Vp=120 >>>> >>>> 120*sin(60*2*pi*x) OR sin(2*pi*60*x)*120 >>>> 120*sin(60*2*pi*x+(120*pi/180)) OR sin(2*pi*60*x+((120/180)*pi)*120 >>>> 120*sin(60*2*pi*x+(240*pi/180)) OR sin(2*pi*60*x+((240/180)*pi)*120 >>> >>> Well, given that you can't even reduce a fraction, that pretty much >>> proves my point that you're a mathematical moron. LOL >>> >>> SPNAK! >>> >>>> you're finally not being a fucktard about correct equations, >>> >>> I never was. I was only "being a fucktard" about the fact that >>> you're using the equations wrong and using the wrong equation, >>> because you're >>> a mathematical moron who doesn't understand what the equation is >>> supposed to do. Moron. LOL >>> >>>> unlike when >>>> you kept insisting that one should both graph and do the math for >>>> two 180 >>>> degree phase shifted signals by flipping the polarity of one of the >>>> signals and "summing" them to get an instantaneous voltage. >>> >>> That wasn't me "insisting that one should both graph and do the math >>> for two 180 degree phase shifted signals by flipping the polarity of >>> one of the signals and "summing" them to get an instantaneous >>> voltage", that was *you*, you backpedaling moron... or did you >>> forget your adding pi to your equation to flip one hot leg by 180 >>> degrees in phase? >>> >>> SPNAK! >>> >>>> "What does 2 (Dual / Split) Phase Power mean? >>>> >>>> If youâ?Tre not electrically minded, think of 2 (Dual / Split) >>>> phase power >>>> like a two pedal bicycle where one (pushing leg) or both (pushing >>>> legs) can provide power. >>>> >>>> Dual Phase or Split Phase power is also Single Phase because >>>> itâ?Ts a two >>>> wire Alternating Current (AC ) power circuit. In the US, this is >>>> the standard household power arrangement with two (Phase A, Phase >>>> B) 120V power wires (180 degrees out of phase with one another) >>>> like two bicycle pedals and one neutral wire. This arrangement >>>> provides (2) 120V and (1) 240V power circuits. 120V power flows >>>> (alternating) between either power wire (through the load) and the >>>> neutral wire. 240V power flows (alternating) between the two power >>>> wires (through the load)." >>>> >>>> "If you connected a dual trace oscope's probes' gnds to the Neutral >>>> (center tapped wire) and put one probe on phase A and the other on >>>> phase B >>>> the waveforms would be 180 degrees out of phase. When A peaks >>>> positive B peaks negative. So how is it that the A-Neutral and >>>> B-Neutral voltages are >>>> said to be "in phase"? [Of course, it makes no sense to ask about >>>> the phasing of A-B - any voltage is always in phase with itself.]" >>> >>> Wrong. They'd be oppositely-phased in relation to the >>> midpoint-neutral, but they cannot be "out of phase" on the hot legs, >>> as connecting directly across the two hot legs gives 240 volts >>> *single*-*phase* at 0 degrees, as you have acknowledged. >>> >>> But thanks for yet again demonstrating your inability to grok how >>> split-phase midpoint-neutral electrical systems work, DildoRider. >>> You are, after all, the moron who's been calling it "two phase", >>> which is just silly. Even Chimpy was laughing at that, and he's as >>> big a moron >>> as you are. >>> >>> SPNAK! >>> >>>>> Educate yourself, you retard. >>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phasor> >>>>> <http://white.stanford.edu/teach/index.php/Fourier_transform_math> >>>>> <http://www.fourier-series.com/> >>> >>>> i took engineering in college, thanks. ;) >>> >>> Oh, then you *did* skip the first day of class when they taught >>> Euler's equation, so you could instead suck dicks in a dark alley. >>> LOL >>> >>> SPNAK! >>> >>>>> That equation in the Stanford link above, based upon Euler's >>>>> sinewave summation equation, allows one to sum *any* number of >>>>> sinewaves of *any* frequency and phase. Moron. >>>>> >>>>> How can you do *any* electronics work and *not* know how to use >>>>> the Fourier transform of Euler's equation, given that using >>>>> complex phasors allows one to not only calculate voltage but >>>>> factor in impedance, current and any other aspect one wants? >>>>> Unless you're the type who solders it together, powers it up and >>>>> prays for no smoke? Moron. LOL >>> >>> <crickets> LOL >>> >>>>> "standard 3-phase power" LOL >>>>> >>>>> Do you mean 3-wire delta, 3-wire wye or 4-wire wye? Moron. LOL >>> >>>> yes, the 3-phase service that powers any of those. >>> >>> Translation: >>> "I... I don't know! I'm in over my head. Don't ask me hard questions >>> or I'll start to spam more bad sinewaves with my kooky sinewave >>> subtraction equation!" >>> >>> <snicker> >>> >>>>> Do you mean a 230 V system, or a 230/400 V system? Moron. LOL >>> >>>> for now, just 230 >>> >>>>> My uncle has a high-leg delta center-tap-grounded system at his >>>>> business, so he can power his 120 volt loads, his single-phase and >>>>> 3-phase 240 volt loads and his 208 volt lighting. Despite the fact >>>>> that delta has been supplanted by wye for new installations in >>>>> the US because of improved load balancing, that's "standard >>>>> 3-phase power", too. Moron. LOL >>> >>>> that's an ideal setup for your uncle. does he have a ball bearing >>>> factory, or something? LOL >>> >>> Or something. LOL >>> >>>>> But let's not get off the topic of you *proving* your kooky >>>>> sinewave subtraction equation didn't calculate those 6 sinewaves >>>>> correctly, >>> >>>> it certainly did plot it correctly and you've not proven otherwise. >>> >>> I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the >>> correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts, as you *proved* >>> and *graphed*, complete with a horizontal line so everyone would be >>> sure to see that your kooky equation didn't work, you moron. LOL >>> >>> Your kooky equation seems to be a result of you squashing together >>> parts of the phasor and trigonometric sinewave expressions, because >>> it's certainly not the correct equation to use. >>> >>> SPNAK! >>> >>>> it is >>>> you who cannot answer the simple question regarding at which time >>>> in seconds that the sine waves that you've conjured would ever >>>> "constructively interfere" to produce 2550.25. >>> >>> You'll have to do the work of proving your kooky sinewave >>> subtraction equation doesn't work, DildoRider. Given that you >>> cannot even make it produce the proper constructively-interfered >>> maximum voltage of 2550.25 volts, there's no way for you to >>> calculate the period of the resultant, therefore you're forced to >>> either admit you're *wrong*, or change to using the correct Euler >>> equation and thereby admit you're *wrong*. >>> >>> SPNAK! >>> >>>>> which means you're using the *wrong* *equation*, >>> >>>> then prove it by posting the *correct* *equation*... >>> >>> I did at the beginning of this whole fiasco, and you bleated that it >>> wasn't the correct equation, then started spamming your bad >>> sinewaves using your kooky sinewave subtraction equation, despite >>> the fact that GnuPlot can use the correct equation, as you proved >>> when you posted about those researchers using it in GnuPlot. >>> >>> SPNAK! >>> >>>>> and despite you >>>>> admitting GnuPlot can use the proper Euler sinewave summation >>>>> equation, >>> >>>> it can use whatever tab-delimited data you give it. so just post >>>> you're euler data points and we'll get down to the bottom of this. >>> >>> Translation: >>> "I'm wrong, but don't want to admit it. I'm too stupid to use the >>> correct Euler equation, but don't want to admit it. So I'll keep >>> spamming my bad sinewaves because I'm a mathematical moron." LOL >>> >>>>> you persist in proving yourself a mathematical moron by >>>>> insisting on using the *wrong* *equation*. LOL >>> >>>> you insist on repetitively and somewhat-schizophrenically bleating >>>> out that everything is *wrong* while being unable to provide any >>>> evidence whatsoever that this is the case. is that somehow the >>>> "high ground" these >>>> days? >>> >>> There are three ways of expressing a sinewave, the trigonometric, >>> complex exponential and phasor methods. I prefer the phasor method, >>> as one can not only calculate phase and voltage, one can factor in >>> impedance, solve for current, etc. >>> >>> You appear to prefer the trigonometric method, but take a look at >>> the proper Euler equation, expressed in the trigonometric >>> expression of a sinewave, and tell me your equation is correct, >>> DildoRider... do you >>> see where you've borrowed parts of the phasor expression of a >>> sinewave, and parts of the trigonometric expression of a sinewave, >>> and added your kooky correcting factors to try to make it work? >>> Then you stupidly switched your minus signs to plus signs and >>> bleated "DAAARRRRHHH! I gots the propur Euler eqooashun now! It >>> don't not work neither!", thereby *proving* you don't have a >>> fucking clue. And you've still not demonstrated that you can jigger >>> your kooky equation to even give the proper output both because >>> your phase is wrong, and the resultant voltage is wrong. Moron. LOL >>> >>> And now, you're reduced to droolbleating "SHOW ME DUH PURDY PICHERS! >>> <clap clap> DUURRRRHHH! I WANNA SEE DUH PURDY PICHERS!" because you >>> have no clue how to do it properly yourself. >>> >>> SPNAK! >>> >>>>>> don't forget... 3-phase *is* separated by 120 degrees instead of >>>>>> 180. don't forget that in your maths. >>>>>> >>>>>> for extra credit use quaternion maths. LOL >>> >>>>> I don't have to graph or calculate a single fucking thing, >>> >>>> well, yeah because you're inept and just trying to cover up for it. >>> >>> Or I know I'm right, and that you're a mathematical moron. And I >>> know you'll do far better proving that fact yourself than I could. >>> I mean, look at all the fuckups you've already made. LOL >>> >>>>> you math challenged moron. >>> >>>> ironic, as you were just challenged to prove your math. >>> >>> You mean the proper Euler equation, in use by every scientist and >>> engineer and proven since the 1700s, whereas your kooky sinewave >>> subtraction equation is only used by one delusional and backpedaling >>> mathematical moron? LOL >>> >>>>> All I had to do was prove you *wrong*, which I did >>>>> by forcing you to prove *yourself* wrong... because I like making >>>>> my kooks do my work for me. >>>>> >>>>> Now get back to work, you slack-jawed mono-browed thick-witted >>>>> uneducated dolt. You've got a lot more bad sinewaves to spam >>>>> before I deem you sufficiently embarrassed to allow you to run >>>>> away with tail tucked. >>>>> >>>>> <snicker> >>> >>>> did everybody applaud? >>> >>> They sure as hell did, but not for you. People just look at the >>> ground and shuffle their feet in embarrassed silence when it comes >>> to you. >>> >>> <snicker> >>> >>> Fag. LOL >>> Idiot. LOL >>> Moron. LOL >>> Tranny. LOL >>> Libtard. LOL >>> Crackhead. LOL >>> GableTard. LOL >>> DildoRider. LOL >>> Bad Musician. LOL >>> Stick Figure. LOL >>> Terrible Liar. LOL >>> Sinewave Spammer. LOL >>> Mathematical Moron. LOL >>> Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL >>> Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL >>> Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL >>> Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL >>> Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL >>> Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL >>> >> >> fakey, why did you trim out the following and refuse to comment on >> it? >> >> i eagerly anticipate fakey's answer to what the following *sums* to >> with his euler summation: >> >> V((L1+L2)-N) = sin(2*pi*f*t)*Vp + sin((2*pi*f*t+(4/3)*pi))*Vp >> >> OR let f=60 and Vp=170: >> >> sin(2*pi*60*t)*170 + sin((2*pi*60*t+(4/3)*pi))*170 >> >> i get: >> >> http://i.imgur.com/gfm2vfV.png >> >> fakey has not only proclaimed that this is the method for >> calculating the voltage that a load would see across those two >> conductors but that it *must* be zero volts. >> >> his furry-euler summations CAN'T be wrong, he sez. > > > I'm sure glad I have no idea what the hell you guys are talking about. discus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-18 16:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <j3lccbhc3a5i8cnu7sk8oc2oktd2gmmv4g@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #630475 |
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 16:24:42 -0700, "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >Skeeter wrote: >> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 18:13:24 -0500, "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder >> living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), >> socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" >> <root@127.0.0.1> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 16:03:43 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote >>> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >>> >>>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >>>> >>>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka >>>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop >>>> Jockey), socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in >>>> <news:op.yc09xkpxtm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first >>>> into the wood chipper again: >>>> >>>>> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 01:20:45 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood >>>>> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka >>>>>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop >>>>>> Jockey), socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in >>>>>> <news:op.yczn3ab2tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head >>>>>> first into the wood chipper again: >>>> >>>>>>> <looks at subject> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> okay, so now please go "sum" any two of the 3 phases of standard >>>>>>> 3-phase >>>>>>> power and tell me how many volts potential it is at any instant, >>>>>>> k0oky. >>>>>>> then "sum" all three. show us the sums. >>>> >>>>>> "at any instant" LOL >>>>>> >>>>>> You mean the time-varying instantaneous voltage, which varies on >>>>>> each hot leg? Moron. LOL >>>>>> >>>>>> V(L1-N) = sin(2*pi*f*t)*Vp >>>>>> V(L2-N) = sin((2*pi*f*t+((4/3)*pi)*Vp >>>>>> V(L3-N) = sin((2*pi*f*t+((2/3)*pi)*Vp >>>> >>>>> hey, those equations look very familiar. you just left out the >>>>> definitions of f=60 and Vp=120 >>>>> >>>>> 120*sin(60*2*pi*x) OR sin(2*pi*60*x)*120 >>>>> 120*sin(60*2*pi*x+(120*pi/180)) OR sin(2*pi*60*x+((120/180)*pi)*120 >>>>> 120*sin(60*2*pi*x+(240*pi/180)) OR sin(2*pi*60*x+((240/180)*pi)*120 >>>> >>>> Well, given that you can't even reduce a fraction, that pretty much >>>> proves my point that you're a mathematical moron. LOL >>>> >>>> SPNAK! >>>> >>>>> you're finally not being a fucktard about correct equations, >>>> >>>> I never was. I was only "being a fucktard" about the fact that >>>> you're using the equations wrong and using the wrong equation, >>>> because you're >>>> a mathematical moron who doesn't understand what the equation is >>>> supposed to do. Moron. LOL >>>> >>>>> unlike when >>>>> you kept insisting that one should both graph and do the math for >>>>> two 180 >>>>> degree phase shifted signals by flipping the polarity of one of the >>>>> signals and "summing" them to get an instantaneous voltage. >>>> >>>> That wasn't me "insisting that one should both graph and do the math >>>> for two 180 degree phase shifted signals by flipping the polarity of >>>> one of the signals and "summing" them to get an instantaneous >>>> voltage", that was *you*, you backpedaling moron... or did you >>>> forget your adding pi to your equation to flip one hot leg by 180 >>>> degrees in phase? >>>> >>>> SPNAK! >>>> >>>>> "What does 2 (Dual / Split) Phase Power mean? >>>>> >>>>> If youâ?Tre not electrically minded, think of 2 (Dual / Split) >>>>> phase power >>>>> like a two pedal bicycle where one (pushing leg) or both (pushing >>>>> legs) can provide power. >>>>> >>>>> Dual Phase or Split Phase power is also Single Phase because >>>>> itâ?Ts a two >>>>> wire Alternating Current (AC ) power circuit. In the US, this is >>>>> the standard household power arrangement with two (Phase A, Phase >>>>> B) 120V power wires (180 degrees out of phase with one another) >>>>> like two bicycle pedals and one neutral wire. This arrangement >>>>> provides (2) 120V and (1) 240V power circuits. 120V power flows >>>>> (alternating) between either power wire (through the load) and the >>>>> neutral wire. 240V power flows (alternating) between the two power >>>>> wires (through the load)." >>>>> >>>>> "If you connected a dual trace oscope's probes' gnds to the Neutral >>>>> (center tapped wire) and put one probe on phase A and the other on >>>>> phase B >>>>> the waveforms would be 180 degrees out of phase. When A peaks >>>>> positive B peaks negative. So how is it that the A-Neutral and >>>>> B-Neutral voltages are >>>>> said to be "in phase"? [Of course, it makes no sense to ask about >>>>> the phasing of A-B - any voltage is always in phase with itself.]" >>>> >>>> Wrong. They'd be oppositely-phased in relation to the >>>> midpoint-neutral, but they cannot be "out of phase" on the hot legs, >>>> as connecting directly across the two hot legs gives 240 volts >>>> *single*-*phase* at 0 degrees, as you have acknowledged. >>>> >>>> But thanks for yet again demonstrating your inability to grok how >>>> split-phase midpoint-neutral electrical systems work, DildoRider. >>>> You are, after all, the moron who's been calling it "two phase", >>>> which is just silly. Even Chimpy was laughing at that, and he's as >>>> big a moron >>>> as you are. >>>> >>>> SPNAK! >>>> >>>>>> Educate yourself, you retard. >>>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phasor> >>>>>> <http://white.stanford.edu/teach/index.php/Fourier_transform_math> >>>>>> <http://www.fourier-series.com/> >>>> >>>>> i took engineering in college, thanks. ;) >>>> >>>> Oh, then you *did* skip the first day of class when they taught >>>> Euler's equation, so you could instead suck dicks in a dark alley. >>>> LOL >>>> >>>> SPNAK! >>>> >>>>>> That equation in the Stanford link above, based upon Euler's >>>>>> sinewave summation equation, allows one to sum *any* number of >>>>>> sinewaves of *any* frequency and phase. Moron. >>>>>> >>>>>> How can you do *any* electronics work and *not* know how to use >>>>>> the Fourier transform of Euler's equation, given that using >>>>>> complex phasors allows one to not only calculate voltage but >>>>>> factor in impedance, current and any other aspect one wants? >>>>>> Unless you're the type who solders it together, powers it up and >>>>>> prays for no smoke? Moron. LOL >>>> >>>> <crickets> LOL >>>> >>>>>> "standard 3-phase power" LOL >>>>>> >>>>>> Do you mean 3-wire delta, 3-wire wye or 4-wire wye? Moron. LOL >>>> >>>>> yes, the 3-phase service that powers any of those. >>>> >>>> Translation: >>>> "I... I don't know! I'm in over my head. Don't ask me hard questions >>>> or I'll start to spam more bad sinewaves with my kooky sinewave >>>> subtraction equation!" >>>> >>>> <snicker> >>>> >>>>>> Do you mean a 230 V system, or a 230/400 V system? Moron. LOL >>>> >>>>> for now, just 230 >>>> >>>>>> My uncle has a high-leg delta center-tap-grounded system at his >>>>>> business, so he can power his 120 volt loads, his single-phase and >>>>>> 3-phase 240 volt loads and his 208 volt lighting. Despite the fact >>>>>> that delta has been supplanted by wye for new installations in >>>>>> the US because of improved load balancing, that's "standard >>>>>> 3-phase power", too. Moron. LOL >>>> >>>>> that's an ideal setup for your uncle. does he have a ball bearing >>>>> factory, or something? LOL >>>> >>>> Or something. LOL >>>> >>>>>> But let's not get off the topic of you *proving* your kooky >>>>>> sinewave subtraction equation didn't calculate those 6 sinewaves >>>>>> correctly, >>>> >>>>> it certainly did plot it correctly and you've not proven otherwise. >>>> >>>> I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the >>>> correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts, as you *proved* >>>> and *graphed*, complete with a horizontal line so everyone would be >>>> sure to see that your kooky equation didn't work, you moron. LOL >>>> >>>> Your kooky equation seems to be a result of you squashing together >>>> parts of the phasor and trigonometric sinewave expressions, because >>>> it's certainly not the correct equation to use. >>>> >>>> SPNAK! >>>> >>>>> it is >>>>> you who cannot answer the simple question regarding at which time >>>>> in seconds that the sine waves that you've conjured would ever >>>>> "constructively interfere" to produce 2550.25. >>>> >>>> You'll have to do the work of proving your kooky sinewave >>>> subtraction equation doesn't work, DildoRider. Given that you >>>> cannot even make it produce the proper constructively-interfered >>>> maximum voltage of 2550.25 volts, there's no way for you to >>>> calculate the period of the resultant, therefore you're forced to >>>> either admit you're *wrong*, or change to using the correct Euler >>>> equation and thereby admit you're *wrong*. >>>> >>>> SPNAK! >>>> >>>>>> which means you're using the *wrong* *equation*, >>>> >>>>> then prove it by posting the *correct* *equation*... >>>> >>>> I did at the beginning of this whole fiasco, and you bleated that it >>>> wasn't the correct equation, then started spamming your bad >>>> sinewaves using your kooky sinewave subtraction equation, despite >>>> the fact that GnuPlot can use the correct equation, as you proved >>>> when you posted about those researchers using it in GnuPlot. >>>> >>>> SPNAK! >>>> >>>>>> and despite you >>>>>> admitting GnuPlot can use the proper Euler sinewave summation >>>>>> equation, >>>> >>>>> it can use whatever tab-delimited data you give it. so just post >>>>> you're euler data points and we'll get down to the bottom of this. >>>> >>>> Translation: >>>> "I'm wrong, but don't want to admit it. I'm too stupid to use the >>>> correct Euler equation, but don't want to admit it. So I'll keep >>>> spamming my bad sinewaves because I'm a mathematical moron." LOL >>>> >>>>>> you persist in proving yourself a mathematical moron by >>>>>> insisting on using the *wrong* *equation*. LOL >>>> >>>>> you insist on repetitively and somewhat-schizophrenically bleating >>>>> out that everything is *wrong* while being unable to provide any >>>>> evidence whatsoever that this is the case. is that somehow the >>>>> "high ground" these >>>>> days? >>>> >>>> There are three ways of expressing a sinewave, the trigonometric, >>>> complex exponential and phasor methods. I prefer the phasor method, >>>> as one can not only calculate phase and voltage, one can factor in >>>> impedance, solve for current, etc. >>>> >>>> You appear to prefer the trigonometric method, but take a look at >>>> the proper Euler equation, expressed in the trigonometric >>>> expression of a sinewave, and tell me your equation is correct, >>>> DildoRider... do you >>>> see where you've borrowed parts of the phasor expression of a >>>> sinewave, and parts of the trigonometric expression of a sinewave, >>>> and added your kooky correcting factors to try to make it work? >>>> Then you stupidly switched your minus signs to plus signs and >>>> bleated "DAAARRRRHHH! I gots the propur Euler eqooashun now! It >>>> don't not work neither!", thereby *proving* you don't have a >>>> fucking clue. And you've still not demonstrated that you can jigger >>>> your kooky equation to even give the proper output both because >>>> your phase is wrong, and the resultant voltage is wrong. Moron. LOL >>>> >>>> And now, you're reduced to droolbleating "SHOW ME DUH PURDY PICHERS! >>>> <clap clap> DUURRRRHHH! I WANNA SEE DUH PURDY PICHERS!" because you >>>> have no clue how to do it properly yourself. >>>> >>>> SPNAK! >>>> >>>>>>> don't forget... 3-phase *is* separated by 120 degrees instead of >>>>>>> 180. don't forget that in your maths. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> for extra credit use quaternion maths. LOL >>>> >>>>>> I don't have to graph or calculate a single fucking thing, >>>> >>>>> well, yeah because you're inept and just trying to cover up for it. >>>> >>>> Or I know I'm right, and that you're a mathematical moron. And I >>>> know you'll do far better proving that fact yourself than I could. >>>> I mean, look at all the fuckups you've already made. LOL >>>> >>>>>> you math challenged moron. >>>> >>>>> ironic, as you were just challenged to prove your math. >>>> >>>> You mean the proper Euler equation, in use by every scientist and >>>> engineer and proven since the 1700s, whereas your kooky sinewave >>>> subtraction equation is only used by one delusional and backpedaling >>>> mathematical moron? LOL >>>> >>>>>> All I had to do was prove you *wrong*, which I did >>>>>> by forcing you to prove *yourself* wrong... because I like making >>>>>> my kooks do my work for me. >>>>>> >>>>>> Now get back to work, you slack-jawed mono-browed thick-witted >>>>>> uneducated dolt. You've got a lot more bad sinewaves to spam >>>>>> before I deem you sufficiently embarrassed to allow you to run >>>>>> away with tail tucked. >>>>>> >>>>>> <snicker> >>>> >>>>> did everybody applaud? >>>> >>>> They sure as hell did, but not for you. People just look at the >>>> ground and shuffle their feet in embarrassed silence when it comes >>>> to you. >>>> >>>> <snicker> >>>> >>>> Fag. LOL >>>> Idiot. LOL >>>> Moron. LOL >>>> Tranny. LOL >>>> Libtard. LOL >>>> Crackhead. LOL >>>> GableTard. LOL >>>> DildoRider. LOL >>>> Bad Musician. LOL >>>> Stick Figure. LOL >>>> Terrible Liar. LOL >>>> Sinewave Spammer. LOL >>>> Mathematical Moron. LOL >>>> Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL >>>> Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL >>>> Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL >>>> Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL >>>> Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL >>>> Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL >>>> >>> >>> fakey, why did you trim out the following and refuse to comment on >>> it? >>> >>> i eagerly anticipate fakey's answer to what the following *sums* to >>> with his euler summation: >>> >>> V((L1+L2)-N) = sin(2*pi*f*t)*Vp + sin((2*pi*f*t+(4/3)*pi))*Vp >>> >>> OR let f=60 and Vp=170: >>> >>> sin(2*pi*60*t)*170 + sin((2*pi*60*t+(4/3)*pi))*170 >>> >>> i get: >>> >>> http://i.imgur.com/gfm2vfV.png >>> >>> fakey has not only proclaimed that this is the method for >>> calculating the voltage that a load would see across those two >>> conductors but that it *must* be zero volts. >>> >>> his furry-euler summations CAN'T be wrong, he sez. >> >> >> I'm sure glad I have no idea what the hell you guys are talking about. > >discus well i think its about surfing, there are signs and waves, i imagine the signs say no surfing after dark.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-18 18:37 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <op.yc1ylfmctm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #630475 |
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 18:24:42 -0500, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > Skeeter wrote: >> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 18:13:24 -0500, "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder >> living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), >> socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" >> <root@127.0.0.1> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 16:03:43 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote >>> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >>> >>>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >>>> >>>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka >>>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop >>>> Jockey), socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in >>>> <news:op.yc09xkpxtm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first >>>> into the wood chipper again: >>>> >>>>> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 01:20:45 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood >>>>> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka >>>>>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop >>>>>> Jockey), socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in >>>>>> <news:op.yczn3ab2tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head >>>>>> first into the wood chipper again: >>>> >>>>>>> <looks at subject> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> okay, so now please go "sum" any two of the 3 phases of standard >>>>>>> 3-phase >>>>>>> power and tell me how many volts potential it is at any instant, >>>>>>> k0oky. >>>>>>> then "sum" all three. show us the sums. >>>> >>>>>> "at any instant" LOL >>>>>> >>>>>> You mean the time-varying instantaneous voltage, which varies on >>>>>> each hot leg? Moron. LOL >>>>>> >>>>>> V(L1-N) = sin(2*pi*f*t)*Vp >>>>>> V(L2-N) = sin((2*pi*f*t+((4/3)*pi)*Vp >>>>>> V(L3-N) = sin((2*pi*f*t+((2/3)*pi)*Vp >>>> >>>>> hey, those equations look very familiar. you just left out the >>>>> definitions of f=60 and Vp=120 >>>>> >>>>> 120*sin(60*2*pi*x) OR sin(2*pi*60*x)*120 >>>>> 120*sin(60*2*pi*x+(120*pi/180)) OR sin(2*pi*60*x+((120/180)*pi)*120 >>>>> 120*sin(60*2*pi*x+(240*pi/180)) OR sin(2*pi*60*x+((240/180)*pi)*120 >>>> >>>> Well, given that you can't even reduce a fraction, that pretty much >>>> proves my point that you're a mathematical moron. LOL >>>> >>>> SPNAK! >>>> >>>>> you're finally not being a fucktard about correct equations, >>>> >>>> I never was. I was only "being a fucktard" about the fact that >>>> you're using the equations wrong and using the wrong equation, >>>> because you're >>>> a mathematical moron who doesn't understand what the equation is >>>> supposed to do. Moron. LOL >>>> >>>>> unlike when >>>>> you kept insisting that one should both graph and do the math for >>>>> two 180 >>>>> degree phase shifted signals by flipping the polarity of one of the >>>>> signals and "summing" them to get an instantaneous voltage. >>>> >>>> That wasn't me "insisting that one should both graph and do the math >>>> for two 180 degree phase shifted signals by flipping the polarity of >>>> one of the signals and "summing" them to get an instantaneous >>>> voltage", that was *you*, you backpedaling moron... or did you >>>> forget your adding pi to your equation to flip one hot leg by 180 >>>> degrees in phase? >>>> >>>> SPNAK! >>>> >>>>> "What does 2 (Dual / Split) Phase Power mean? >>>>> >>>>> If youâ?Tre not electrically minded, think of 2 (Dual / Split) >>>>> phase power >>>>> like a two pedal bicycle where one (pushing leg) or both (pushing >>>>> legs) can provide power. >>>>> >>>>> Dual Phase or Split Phase power is also Single Phase because >>>>> itâ?Ts a two >>>>> wire Alternating Current (AC ) power circuit. In the US, this is >>>>> the standard household power arrangement with two (Phase A, Phase >>>>> B) 120V power wires (180 degrees out of phase with one another) >>>>> like two bicycle pedals and one neutral wire. This arrangement >>>>> provides (2) 120V and (1) 240V power circuits. 120V power flows >>>>> (alternating) between either power wire (through the load) and the >>>>> neutral wire. 240V power flows (alternating) between the two power >>>>> wires (through the load)." >>>>> >>>>> "If you connected a dual trace oscope's probes' gnds to the Neutral >>>>> (center tapped wire) and put one probe on phase A and the other on >>>>> phase B >>>>> the waveforms would be 180 degrees out of phase. When A peaks >>>>> positive B peaks negative. So how is it that the A-Neutral and >>>>> B-Neutral voltages are >>>>> said to be "in phase"? [Of course, it makes no sense to ask about >>>>> the phasing of A-B - any voltage is always in phase with itself.]" >>>> >>>> Wrong. They'd be oppositely-phased in relation to the >>>> midpoint-neutral, but they cannot be "out of phase" on the hot legs, >>>> as connecting directly across the two hot legs gives 240 volts >>>> *single*-*phase* at 0 degrees, as you have acknowledged. >>>> >>>> But thanks for yet again demonstrating your inability to grok how >>>> split-phase midpoint-neutral electrical systems work, DildoRider. >>>> You are, after all, the moron who's been calling it "two phase", >>>> which is just silly. Even Chimpy was laughing at that, and he's as >>>> big a moron >>>> as you are. >>>> >>>> SPNAK! >>>> >>>>>> Educate yourself, you retard. >>>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phasor> >>>>>> <http://white.stanford.edu/teach/index.php/Fourier_transform_math> >>>>>> <http://www.fourier-series.com/> >>>> >>>>> i took engineering in college, thanks. ;) >>>> >>>> Oh, then you *did* skip the first day of class when they taught >>>> Euler's equation, so you could instead suck dicks in a dark alley. >>>> LOL >>>> >>>> SPNAK! >>>> >>>>>> That equation in the Stanford link above, based upon Euler's >>>>>> sinewave summation equation, allows one to sum *any* number of >>>>>> sinewaves of *any* frequency and phase. Moron. >>>>>> >>>>>> How can you do *any* electronics work and *not* know how to use >>>>>> the Fourier transform of Euler's equation, given that using >>>>>> complex phasors allows one to not only calculate voltage but >>>>>> factor in impedance, current and any other aspect one wants? >>>>>> Unless you're the type who solders it together, powers it up and >>>>>> prays for no smoke? Moron. LOL >>>> >>>> <crickets> LOL >>>> >>>>>> "standard 3-phase power" LOL >>>>>> >>>>>> Do you mean 3-wire delta, 3-wire wye or 4-wire wye? Moron. LOL >>>> >>>>> yes, the 3-phase service that powers any of those. >>>> >>>> Translation: >>>> "I... I don't know! I'm in over my head. Don't ask me hard questions >>>> or I'll start to spam more bad sinewaves with my kooky sinewave >>>> subtraction equation!" >>>> >>>> <snicker> >>>> >>>>>> Do you mean a 230 V system, or a 230/400 V system? Moron. LOL >>>> >>>>> for now, just 230 >>>> >>>>>> My uncle has a high-leg delta center-tap-grounded system at his >>>>>> business, so he can power his 120 volt loads, his single-phase and >>>>>> 3-phase 240 volt loads and his 208 volt lighting. Despite the fact >>>>>> that delta has been supplanted by wye for new installations in >>>>>> the US because of improved load balancing, that's "standard >>>>>> 3-phase power", too. Moron. LOL >>>> >>>>> that's an ideal setup for your uncle. does he have a ball bearing >>>>> factory, or something? LOL >>>> >>>> Or something. LOL >>>> >>>>>> But let's not get off the topic of you *proving* your kooky >>>>>> sinewave subtraction equation didn't calculate those 6 sinewaves >>>>>> correctly, >>>> >>>>> it certainly did plot it correctly and you've not proven otherwise. >>>> >>>> I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the >>>> correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts, as you *proved* >>>> and *graphed*, complete with a horizontal line so everyone would be >>>> sure to see that your kooky equation didn't work, you moron. LOL >>>> >>>> Your kooky equation seems to be a result of you squashing together >>>> parts of the phasor and trigonometric sinewave expressions, because >>>> it's certainly not the correct equation to use. >>>> >>>> SPNAK! >>>> >>>>> it is >>>>> you who cannot answer the simple question regarding at which time >>>>> in seconds that the sine waves that you've conjured would ever >>>>> "constructively interfere" to produce 2550.25. >>>> >>>> You'll have to do the work of proving your kooky sinewave >>>> subtraction equation doesn't work, DildoRider. Given that you >>>> cannot even make it produce the proper constructively-interfered >>>> maximum voltage of 2550.25 volts, there's no way for you to >>>> calculate the period of the resultant, therefore you're forced to >>>> either admit you're *wrong*, or change to using the correct Euler >>>> equation and thereby admit you're *wrong*. >>>> >>>> SPNAK! >>>> >>>>>> which means you're using the *wrong* *equation*, >>>> >>>>> then prove it by posting the *correct* *equation*... >>>> >>>> I did at the beginning of this whole fiasco, and you bleated that it >>>> wasn't the correct equation, then started spamming your bad >>>> sinewaves using your kooky sinewave subtraction equation, despite >>>> the fact that GnuPlot can use the correct equation, as you proved >>>> when you posted about those researchers using it in GnuPlot. >>>> >>>> SPNAK! >>>> >>>>>> and despite you >>>>>> admitting GnuPlot can use the proper Euler sinewave summation >>>>>> equation, >>>> >>>>> it can use whatever tab-delimited data you give it. so just post >>>>> you're euler data points and we'll get down to the bottom of this. >>>> >>>> Translation: >>>> "I'm wrong, but don't want to admit it. I'm too stupid to use the >>>> correct Euler equation, but don't want to admit it. So I'll keep >>>> spamming my bad sinewaves because I'm a mathematical moron." LOL >>>> >>>>>> you persist in proving yourself a mathematical moron by >>>>>> insisting on using the *wrong* *equation*. LOL >>>> >>>>> you insist on repetitively and somewhat-schizophrenically bleating >>>>> out that everything is *wrong* while being unable to provide any >>>>> evidence whatsoever that this is the case. is that somehow the >>>>> "high ground" these >>>>> days? >>>> >>>> There are three ways of expressing a sinewave, the trigonometric, >>>> complex exponential and phasor methods. I prefer the phasor method, >>>> as one can not only calculate phase and voltage, one can factor in >>>> impedance, solve for current, etc. >>>> >>>> You appear to prefer the trigonometric method, but take a look at >>>> the proper Euler equation, expressed in the trigonometric >>>> expression of a sinewave, and tell me your equation is correct, >>>> DildoRider... do you >>>> see where you've borrowed parts of the phasor expression of a >>>> sinewave, and parts of the trigonometric expression of a sinewave, >>>> and added your kooky correcting factors to try to make it work? >>>> Then you stupidly switched your minus signs to plus signs and >>>> bleated "DAAARRRRHHH! I gots the propur Euler eqooashun now! It >>>> don't not work neither!", thereby *proving* you don't have a >>>> fucking clue. And you've still not demonstrated that you can jigger >>>> your kooky equation to even give the proper output both because >>>> your phase is wrong, and the resultant voltage is wrong. Moron. LOL >>>> >>>> And now, you're reduced to droolbleating "SHOW ME DUH PURDY PICHERS! >>>> <clap clap> DUURRRRHHH! I WANNA SEE DUH PURDY PICHERS!" because you >>>> have no clue how to do it properly yourself. >>>> >>>> SPNAK! >>>> >>>>>>> don't forget... 3-phase *is* separated by 120 degrees instead of >>>>>>> 180. don't forget that in your maths. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> for extra credit use quaternion maths. LOL >>>> >>>>>> I don't have to graph or calculate a single fucking thing, >>>> >>>>> well, yeah because you're inept and just trying to cover up for it. >>>> >>>> Or I know I'm right, and that you're a mathematical moron. And I >>>> know you'll do far better proving that fact yourself than I could. >>>> I mean, look at all the fuckups you've already made. LOL >>>> >>>>>> you math challenged moron. >>>> >>>>> ironic, as you were just challenged to prove your math. >>>> >>>> You mean the proper Euler equation, in use by every scientist and >>>> engineer and proven since the 1700s, whereas your kooky sinewave >>>> subtraction equation is only used by one delusional and backpedaling >>>> mathematical moron? LOL >>>> >>>>>> All I had to do was prove you *wrong*, which I did >>>>>> by forcing you to prove *yourself* wrong... because I like making >>>>>> my kooks do my work for me. >>>>>> >>>>>> Now get back to work, you slack-jawed mono-browed thick-witted >>>>>> uneducated dolt. You've got a lot more bad sinewaves to spam >>>>>> before I deem you sufficiently embarrassed to allow you to run >>>>>> away with tail tucked. >>>>>> >>>>>> <snicker> >>>> >>>>> did everybody applaud? >>>> >>>> They sure as hell did, but not for you. People just look at the >>>> ground and shuffle their feet in embarrassed silence when it comes >>>> to you. >>>> >>>> <snicker> >>>> >>>> Fag. LOL >>>> Idiot. LOL >>>> Moron. LOL >>>> Tranny. LOL >>>> Libtard. LOL >>>> Crackhead. LOL >>>> GableTard. LOL >>>> DildoRider. LOL >>>> Bad Musician. LOL >>>> Stick Figure. LOL >>>> Terrible Liar. LOL >>>> Sinewave Spammer. LOL >>>> Mathematical Moron. LOL >>>> Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL >>>> Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL >>>> Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL >>>> Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL >>>> Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL >>>> Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL >>>> >>> >>> fakey, why did you trim out the following and refuse to comment on >>> it? >>> >>> i eagerly anticipate fakey's answer to what the following *sums* to >>> with his euler summation: >>> >>> V((L1+L2)-N) = sin(2*pi*f*t)*Vp + sin((2*pi*f*t+(4/3)*pi))*Vp >>> >>> OR let f=60 and Vp=170: >>> >>> sin(2*pi*60*t)*170 + sin((2*pi*60*t+(4/3)*pi))*170 >>> >>> i get: >>> >>> http://i.imgur.com/gfm2vfV.png >>> >>> fakey has not only proclaimed that this is the method for >>> calculating the voltage that a load would see across those two >>> conductors but that it *must* be zero volts. >>> >>> his furry-euler summations CAN'T be wrong, he sez. >> >> >> I'm sure glad I have no idea what the hell you guys are talking about. > > discus add your legs together. -- "sines, sines, everywhere there's sines blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind" http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu - FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID: <3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com> ">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics >> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all: >> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) >> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) >> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time: >> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x) Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking *moron*? "The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:"" it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/ http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png "To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each other:" http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf on page 2: ** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A) *COUGH* SPNAK!! - i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII art if you ask nicely. see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com> - Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to: "all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..." <f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com> - On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: <snicker> Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Terrible Liar. LOL Sinewave Spammer. LOL Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL is where my usenet lord and mas-ter can go straight to hell* *hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening. - http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg http://cafepress.com/kooktown http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg - If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :) - if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try: http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2 - http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written, Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd - Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!: $ perl fakeyBot.pl FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you, look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker> You> Robert Michael Wolfe FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks, Robert. <snicker> Robert> you talk about cocks a lot. FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot? Robert> gay sex, mostly... FakeyBot> Fag! (just as useful as the original!) - snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message <b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>: "That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden service. It's not rocket science. _The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my distinct impression was that the "anonymity research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a kiddie pr0n network.) That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation Onymous was just icing on the cake."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-19 05:43 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1miuqht.tddbxyay4ftdN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #630473 |
Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 18:13:24 -0500, "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder
> living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
> socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117"
> <root@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 16:03:43 -0500,
> > Fakey Neighborhood Vote Wanker Ersatzus
> > <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> >
> >> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
[...]
> >> Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
> >>
> >
> >fakey, why did you trim out the following and refuse to comment on it?
> >
> >i eagerly anticipate fakey's answer to what the following *sums* to with
> >his euler summation:
> >
> >V((L1+L2)-N) = sin(2*pi*f*t)*Vp + sin((2*pi*f*t+(4/3)*pi))*Vp
> >
> >OR let f=60 and Vp=170:
> >
> >sin(2*pi*60*t)*170 + sin((2*pi*60*t+(4/3)*pi))*170
> >
> >i get:
> >
> >http://i.imgur.com/gfm2vfV.png
> >
> >fakey has not only proclaimed that this is the method for calculating the
> >voltage that a load would see across those two conductors but that it
> >*must* be zero volts.
> >
> >his furry-euler summations CAN'T be wrong, he sez.
>
>
> I'm sure glad I have no idea what the hell you guys are talking about.
>
Neither has Fakey.
--
^Ï^. Sn!pe <snipeco.1@gmail.com>
My pet rock Gordon just is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-19 11:15 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <op.yc28rdbhtm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #630473 |
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 18:22:38 -0500, Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote: > On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 18:13:24 -0500, "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder > living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), > socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" > <root@127.0.0.1> wrote: > >> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 16:03:43 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler >> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >> >>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >>> >>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka >>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), >>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in >>> <news:op.yc09xkpxtm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first >>> into the wood chipper again: >>> >>>> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 01:20:45 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood >>>> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >>> >>>>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka >>>>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop >>>>> Jockey), >>>>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in >>>>> <news:op.yczn3ab2tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first >>>>> into the wood chipper again: >>> >>>>>> <looks at subject> >>>>>> >>>>>> okay, so now please go "sum" any two of the 3 phases of standard >>>>>> 3-phase >>>>>> power and tell me how many volts potential it is at any instant, >>>>>> k0oky. >>>>>> then "sum" all three. show us the sums. >>> >>>>> "at any instant" LOL >>>>> >>>>> You mean the time-varying instantaneous voltage, which varies on each >>>>> hot leg? Moron. LOL >>>>> >>>>> V(L1-N) = sin(2*pi*f*t)*Vp >>>>> V(L2-N) = sin((2*pi*f*t+((4/3)*pi)*Vp >>>>> V(L3-N) = sin((2*pi*f*t+((2/3)*pi)*Vp >>> >>>> hey, those equations look very familiar. you just left out the >>>> definitions of f=60 and Vp=120 >>>> >>>> 120*sin(60*2*pi*x) OR sin(2*pi*60*x)*120 >>>> 120*sin(60*2*pi*x+(120*pi/180)) OR sin(2*pi*60*x+((120/180)*pi)*120 >>>> 120*sin(60*2*pi*x+(240*pi/180)) OR sin(2*pi*60*x+((240/180)*pi)*120 >>> >>> Well, given that you can't even reduce a fraction, that pretty much >>> proves my point that you're a mathematical moron. LOL >>> >>> SPNAK! >>> >>>> you're finally not being a fucktard about correct equations, >>> >>> I never was. I was only "being a fucktard" about the fact that you're >>> using the equations wrong and using the wrong equation, because you're >>> a mathematical moron who doesn't understand what the equation is >>> supposed to do. Moron. LOL >>> >>>> unlike when >>>> you kept insisting that one should both graph and do the math for two >>>> 180 >>>> degree phase shifted signals by flipping the polarity of one of the >>>> signals and "summing" them to get an instantaneous voltage. >>> >>> That wasn't me "insisting that one should both graph and do the math >>> for two 180 degree phase shifted signals by flipping the polarity of >>> one of the signals and "summing" them to get an instantaneous >>> voltage", that was *you*, you backpedaling moron... or did you forget >>> your adding pi to your equation to flip one hot leg by 180 degrees in >>> phase? >>> >>> SPNAK! >>> >>>> "What does 2 (Dual / Split) Phase Power mean? >>>> >>>> If you’re not electrically minded, think of 2 (Dual / Split) phase >>>> power >>>> like a two pedal bicycle where one (pushing leg) or both (pushing >>>> legs) >>>> can provide power. >>>> >>>> Dual Phase or Split Phase power is also Single Phase because it’s a >>>> two >>>> wire Alternating Current (AC ) power circuit. In the US, this is the >>>> standard household power arrangement with two (Phase A, Phase B) 120V >>>> power wires (180 degrees out of phase with one another) like two >>>> bicycle >>>> pedals and one neutral wire. This arrangement provides (2) 120V and >>>> (1) >>>> 240V power circuits. 120V power flows (alternating) between either >>>> power >>>> wire (through the load) and the neutral wire. 240V power flows >>>> (alternating) between the two power wires (through the load)." >>>> >>>> "If you connected a dual trace oscope's probes' gnds to the Neutral >>>> (center tapped wire) and put one probe on phase A and the other on >>>> phase B >>>> the waveforms would be 180 degrees out of phase. When A peaks >>>> positive B >>>> peaks negative. So how is it that the A-Neutral and B-Neutral voltages >>>> are >>>> said to be "in phase"? [Of course, it makes no sense to ask about the >>>> phasing of A-B - any voltage is always in phase with itself.]" >>> >>> Wrong. They'd be oppositely-phased in relation to the >>> midpoint-neutral, but they cannot be "out of phase" on the hot legs, >>> as connecting directly across the two hot legs gives 240 volts >>> *single*-*phase* at 0 degrees, as you have acknowledged. >>> >>> But thanks for yet again demonstrating your inability to grok how >>> split-phase midpoint-neutral electrical systems work, DildoRider. You >>> are, after all, the moron who's been calling it "two phase", which is >>> just silly. Even Chimpy was laughing at that, and he's as big a moron >>> as you are. >>> >>> SPNAK! >>> >>>>> Educate yourself, you retard. >>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phasor> >>>>> <http://white.stanford.edu/teach/index.php/Fourier_transform_math> >>>>> <http://www.fourier-series.com/> >>> >>>> i took engineering in college, thanks. ;) >>> >>> Oh, then you *did* skip the first day of class when they taught >>> Euler's equation, so you could instead suck dicks in a dark alley. LOL >>> >>> SPNAK! >>> >>>>> That equation in the Stanford link above, based upon Euler's sinewave >>>>> summation equation, allows one to sum *any* number of sinewaves of >>>>> *any* frequency and phase. Moron. >>>>> >>>>> How can you do *any* electronics work and *not* know how to use the >>>>> Fourier transform of Euler's equation, given that using complex >>>>> phasors allows one to not only calculate voltage but factor in >>>>> impedance, current and any other aspect one wants? Unless you're the >>>>> type who solders it together, powers it up and prays for no smoke? >>>>> Moron. LOL >>> >>> <crickets> LOL >>> >>>>> "standard 3-phase power" LOL >>>>> >>>>> Do you mean 3-wire delta, 3-wire wye or 4-wire wye? Moron. LOL >>> >>>> yes, the 3-phase service that powers any of those. >>> >>> Translation: >>> "I... I don't know! I'm in over my head. Don't ask me hard questions >>> or I'll start to spam more bad sinewaves with my kooky sinewave >>> subtraction equation!" >>> >>> <snicker> >>> >>>>> Do you mean a 230 V system, or a 230/400 V system? Moron. LOL >>> >>>> for now, just 230 >>> >>>>> My uncle has a high-leg delta center-tap-grounded system at his >>>>> business, so he can power his 120 volt loads, his single-phase and >>>>> 3-phase 240 volt loads and his 208 volt lighting. Despite the fact >>>>> that delta has been supplanted by wye for new installations in the US >>>>> because of improved load balancing, that's "standard 3-phase power", >>>>> too. Moron. LOL >>> >>>> that's an ideal setup for your uncle. does he have a ball bearing >>>> factory, or something? LOL >>> >>> Or something. LOL >>> >>>>> But let's not get off the topic of you *proving* your kooky sinewave >>>>> subtraction equation didn't calculate those 6 sinewaves correctly, >>> >>>> it certainly did plot it correctly and you've not proven otherwise. >>> >>> I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the >>> correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts, as you *proved* >>> and *graphed*, complete with a horizontal line so everyone would be >>> sure to see that your kooky equation didn't work, you moron. LOL >>> >>> Your kooky equation seems to be a result of you squashing together >>> parts of the phasor and trigonometric sinewave expressions, because >>> it's certainly not the correct equation to use. >>> >>> SPNAK! >>> >>>> it is >>>> you who cannot answer the simple question regarding at which time in >>>> seconds that the sine waves that you've conjured would ever >>>> "constructively interfere" to produce 2550.25. >>> >>> You'll have to do the work of proving your kooky sinewave subtraction >>> equation doesn't work, DildoRider. Given that you cannot even make it >>> produce the proper constructively-interfered maximum voltage of >>> 2550.25 volts, there's no way for you to calculate the period of the >>> resultant, therefore you're forced to either admit you're *wrong*, or >>> change to using the correct Euler equation and thereby admit you're >>> *wrong*. >>> >>> SPNAK! >>> >>>>> which means you're using the *wrong* *equation*, >>> >>>> then prove it by posting the *correct* *equation*... >>> >>> I did at the beginning of this whole fiasco, and you bleated that it >>> wasn't the correct equation, then started spamming your bad sinewaves >>> using your kooky sinewave subtraction equation, despite the fact that >>> GnuPlot can use the correct equation, as you proved when you posted >>> about those researchers using it in GnuPlot. >>> >>> SPNAK! >>> >>>>> and despite you >>>>> admitting GnuPlot can use the proper Euler sinewave summation >>>>> equation, >>> >>>> it can use whatever tab-delimited data you give it. so just post >>>> you're >>>> euler data points and we'll get down to the bottom of this. >>> >>> Translation: >>> "I'm wrong, but don't want to admit it. I'm too stupid to use the >>> correct Euler equation, but don't want to admit it. So I'll keep >>> spamming my bad sinewaves because I'm a mathematical moron." LOL >>> >>>>> you persist in proving yourself a mathematical moron by >>>>> insisting on using the *wrong* *equation*. LOL >>> >>>> you insist on repetitively and somewhat-schizophrenically bleating out >>>> that everything is *wrong* while being unable to provide any evidence >>>> whatsoever that this is the case. is that somehow the "high ground" >>>> these >>>> days? >>> >>> There are three ways of expressing a sinewave, the trigonometric, >>> complex exponential and phasor methods. I prefer the phasor method, as >>> one can not only calculate phase and voltage, one can factor in >>> impedance, solve for current, etc. >>> >>> You appear to prefer the trigonometric method, but take a look at the >>> proper Euler equation, expressed in the trigonometric expression of a >>> sinewave, and tell me your equation is correct, DildoRider... do you >>> see where you've borrowed parts of the phasor expression of a >>> sinewave, and parts of the trigonometric expression of a sinewave, and >>> added your kooky correcting factors to try to make it work? Then you >>> stupidly switched your minus signs to plus signs and bleated >>> "DAAARRRRHHH! I gots the propur Euler eqooashun now! It don't not work >>> neither!", thereby *proving* you don't have a fucking clue. And you've >>> still not demonstrated that you can jigger your kooky equation to even >>> give the proper output both because your phase is wrong, and the >>> resultant voltage is wrong. Moron. LOL >>> >>> And now, you're reduced to droolbleating "SHOW ME DUH PURDY PICHERS! >>> <clap clap> DUURRRRHHH! I WANNA SEE DUH PURDY PICHERS!" because you >>> have no clue how to do it properly yourself. >>> >>> SPNAK! >>> >>>>>> don't forget... 3-phase *is* separated by 120 degrees instead of >>>>>> 180. >>>>>> don't forget that in your maths. >>>>>> >>>>>> for extra credit use quaternion maths. LOL >>> >>>>> I don't have to graph or calculate a single fucking thing, >>> >>>> well, yeah because you're inept and just trying to cover up for it. >>> >>> Or I know I'm right, and that you're a mathematical moron. And I know >>> you'll do far better proving that fact yourself than I could. I mean, >>> look at all the fuckups you've already made. LOL >>> >>>>> you math challenged moron. >>> >>>> ironic, as you were just challenged to prove your math. >>> >>> You mean the proper Euler equation, in use by every scientist and >>> engineer and proven since the 1700s, whereas your kooky sinewave >>> subtraction equation is only used by one delusional and backpedaling >>> mathematical moron? LOL >>> >>>>> All I had to do was prove you *wrong*, which I did >>>>> by forcing you to prove *yourself* wrong... because I like making my >>>>> kooks do my work for me. >>>>> >>>>> Now get back to work, you slack-jawed mono-browed thick-witted >>>>> uneducated dolt. You've got a lot more bad sinewaves to spam before I >>>>> deem you sufficiently embarrassed to allow you to run away with tail >>>>> tucked. >>>>> >>>>> <snicker> >>> >>>> did everybody applaud? >>> >>> They sure as hell did, but not for you. People just look at the ground >>> and shuffle their feet in embarrassed silence when it comes to you. >>> >>> <snicker> >>> >>> Fag. LOL >>> Idiot. LOL >>> Moron. LOL >>> Tranny. LOL >>> Libtard. LOL >>> Crackhead. LOL >>> GableTard. LOL >>> DildoRider. LOL >>> Bad Musician. LOL >>> Stick Figure. LOL >>> Terrible Liar. LOL >>> Sinewave Spammer. LOL >>> Mathematical Moron. LOL >>> Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL >>> Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL >>> Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL >>> Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL >>> Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL >>> Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL >>> >> >> fakey, why did you trim out the following and refuse to comment on it? >> >> i eagerly anticipate fakey's answer to what the following *sums* to with >> his euler summation: >> >> V((L1+L2)-N) = sin(2*pi*f*t)*Vp + sin((2*pi*f*t+(4/3)*pi))*Vp >> >> OR let f=60 and Vp=170: >> >> sin(2*pi*60*t)*170 + sin((2*pi*60*t+(4/3)*pi))*170 >> >> i get: >> >> http://i.imgur.com/gfm2vfV.png >> >> fakey has not only proclaimed that this is the method for calculating >> the >> voltage that a load would see across those two conductors but that it >> *must* be zero volts. >> >> his furry-euler summations CAN'T be wrong, he sez. > > > I'm sure glad I have no idea what the hell you guys are talking about. now you sound like the tiny voice inside bleaty the spankard's head that nobody has ever heard from. -- "sines, sines, everywhere there's sines blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind" http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu - FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID: <3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com> ">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics >> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all: >> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) >> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) >> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time: >> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x) Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking *moron*? "The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:"" it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/ http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png "To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each other:" http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf on page 2: ** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A) *COUGH* SPNAK!! - i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII art if you ask nicely. see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com> - Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to: "all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..." <f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com> - On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: <snicker> Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Terrible Liar. LOL Sinewave Spammer. LOL Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL is where my usenet lord and mas-ter can go straight to hell* *hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening. - http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg http://cafepress.com/kooktown http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg - If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :) - if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try: http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2 - http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written, Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd - Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!: $ perl fakeyBot.pl FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you, look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker> You> Robert Michael Wolfe FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks, Robert. <snicker> Robert> you talk about cocks a lot. FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot? Robert> gay sex, mostly... FakeyBot> Fag! (just as useful as the original!) - snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message <b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>: "That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden service. It's not rocket science. _The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my distinct impression was that the "anonymity research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a kiddie pr0n network.) That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation Onymous was just icing on the cake." - Golden Killfile, June 2005 KOTM, November 2006 Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007 Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006 Busted Urinal Award, April 2007 Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008 Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007 AUK Mascot, September 2007
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-19 10:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <cdjecb5uamguajnh7pt2t1r8oo1sb70tit@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #630570 |
On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 11:15:03 -0500, "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> wrote: >On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 18:22:38 -0500, Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote: > >> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 18:13:24 -0500, "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder >> living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), >> socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" >> <root@127.0.0.1> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 16:03:43 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler >>> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >>> >>>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >>>> >>>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka >>>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), >>>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in >>>> <news:op.yc09xkpxtm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first >>>> into the wood chipper again: >>>> >>>>> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 01:20:45 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood >>>>> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka >>>>>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop >>>>>> Jockey), >>>>>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in >>>>>> <news:op.yczn3ab2tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first >>>>>> into the wood chipper again: >>>> >>>>>>> <looks at subject> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> okay, so now please go "sum" any two of the 3 phases of standard >>>>>>> 3-phase >>>>>>> power and tell me how many volts potential it is at any instant, >>>>>>> k0oky. >>>>>>> then "sum" all three. show us the sums. >>>> >>>>>> "at any instant" LOL >>>>>> >>>>>> You mean the time-varying instantaneous voltage, which varies on each >>>>>> hot leg? Moron. LOL >>>>>> >>>>>> V(L1-N) = sin(2*pi*f*t)*Vp >>>>>> V(L2-N) = sin((2*pi*f*t+((4/3)*pi)*Vp >>>>>> V(L3-N) = sin((2*pi*f*t+((2/3)*pi)*Vp >>>> >>>>> hey, those equations look very familiar. you just left out the >>>>> definitions of f=60 and Vp=120 >>>>> >>>>> 120*sin(60*2*pi*x) OR sin(2*pi*60*x)*120 >>>>> 120*sin(60*2*pi*x+(120*pi/180)) OR sin(2*pi*60*x+((120/180)*pi)*120 >>>>> 120*sin(60*2*pi*x+(240*pi/180)) OR sin(2*pi*60*x+((240/180)*pi)*120 >>>> >>>> Well, given that you can't even reduce a fraction, that pretty much >>>> proves my point that you're a mathematical moron. LOL >>>> >>>> SPNAK! >>>> >>>>> you're finally not being a fucktard about correct equations, >>>> >>>> I never was. I was only "being a fucktard" about the fact that you're >>>> using the equations wrong and using the wrong equation, because you're >>>> a mathematical moron who doesn't understand what the equation is >>>> supposed to do. Moron. LOL >>>> >>>>> unlike when >>>>> you kept insisting that one should both graph and do the math for two >>>>> 180 >>>>> degree phase shifted signals by flipping the polarity of one of the >>>>> signals and "summing" them to get an instantaneous voltage. >>>> >>>> That wasn't me "insisting that one should both graph and do the math >>>> for two 180 degree phase shifted signals by flipping the polarity of >>>> one of the signals and "summing" them to get an instantaneous >>>> voltage", that was *you*, you backpedaling moron... or did you forget >>>> your adding pi to your equation to flip one hot leg by 180 degrees in >>>> phase? >>>> >>>> SPNAK! >>>> >>>>> "What does 2 (Dual / Split) Phase Power mean? >>>>> >>>>> If you’re not electrically minded, think of 2 (Dual / Split) phase >>>>> power >>>>> like a two pedal bicycle where one (pushing leg) or both (pushing >>>>> legs) >>>>> can provide power. >>>>> >>>>> Dual Phase or Split Phase power is also Single Phase because it’s a >>>>> two >>>>> wire Alternating Current (AC ) power circuit. In the US, this is the >>>>> standard household power arrangement with two (Phase A, Phase B) 120V >>>>> power wires (180 degrees out of phase with one another) like two >>>>> bicycle >>>>> pedals and one neutral wire. This arrangement provides (2) 120V and >>>>> (1) >>>>> 240V power circuits. 120V power flows (alternating) between either >>>>> power >>>>> wire (through the load) and the neutral wire. 240V power flows >>>>> (alternating) between the two power wires (through the load)." >>>>> >>>>> "If you connected a dual trace oscope's probes' gnds to the Neutral >>>>> (center tapped wire) and put one probe on phase A and the other on >>>>> phase B >>>>> the waveforms would be 180 degrees out of phase. When A peaks >>>>> positive B >>>>> peaks negative. So how is it that the A-Neutral and B-Neutral voltages >>>>> are >>>>> said to be "in phase"? [Of course, it makes no sense to ask about the >>>>> phasing of A-B - any voltage is always in phase with itself.]" >>>> >>>> Wrong. They'd be oppositely-phased in relation to the >>>> midpoint-neutral, but they cannot be "out of phase" on the hot legs, >>>> as connecting directly across the two hot legs gives 240 volts >>>> *single*-*phase* at 0 degrees, as you have acknowledged. >>>> >>>> But thanks for yet again demonstrating your inability to grok how >>>> split-phase midpoint-neutral electrical systems work, DildoRider. You >>>> are, after all, the moron who's been calling it "two phase", which is >>>> just silly. Even Chimpy was laughing at that, and he's as big a moron >>>> as you are. >>>> >>>> SPNAK! >>>> >>>>>> Educate yourself, you retard. >>>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phasor> >>>>>> <http://white.stanford.edu/teach/index.php/Fourier_transform_math> >>>>>> <http://www.fourier-series.com/> >>>> >>>>> i took engineering in college, thanks. ;) >>>> >>>> Oh, then you *did* skip the first day of class when they taught >>>> Euler's equation, so you could instead suck dicks in a dark alley. LOL >>>> >>>> SPNAK! >>>> >>>>>> That equation in the Stanford link above, based upon Euler's sinewave >>>>>> summation equation, allows one to sum *any* number of sinewaves of >>>>>> *any* frequency and phase. Moron. >>>>>> >>>>>> How can you do *any* electronics work and *not* know how to use the >>>>>> Fourier transform of Euler's equation, given that using complex >>>>>> phasors allows one to not only calculate voltage but factor in >>>>>> impedance, current and any other aspect one wants? Unless you're the >>>>>> type who solders it together, powers it up and prays for no smoke? >>>>>> Moron. LOL >>>> >>>> <crickets> LOL >>>> >>>>>> "standard 3-phase power" LOL >>>>>> >>>>>> Do you mean 3-wire delta, 3-wire wye or 4-wire wye? Moron. LOL >>>> >>>>> yes, the 3-phase service that powers any of those. >>>> >>>> Translation: >>>> "I... I don't know! I'm in over my head. Don't ask me hard questions >>>> or I'll start to spam more bad sinewaves with my kooky sinewave >>>> subtraction equation!" >>>> >>>> <snicker> >>>> >>>>>> Do you mean a 230 V system, or a 230/400 V system? Moron. LOL >>>> >>>>> for now, just 230 >>>> >>>>>> My uncle has a high-leg delta center-tap-grounded system at his >>>>>> business, so he can power his 120 volt loads, his single-phase and >>>>>> 3-phase 240 volt loads and his 208 volt lighting. Despite the fact >>>>>> that delta has been supplanted by wye for new installations in the US >>>>>> because of improved load balancing, that's "standard 3-phase power", >>>>>> too. Moron. LOL >>>> >>>>> that's an ideal setup for your uncle. does he have a ball bearing >>>>> factory, or something? LOL >>>> >>>> Or something. LOL >>>> >>>>>> But let's not get off the topic of you *proving* your kooky sinewave >>>>>> subtraction equation didn't calculate those 6 sinewaves correctly, >>>> >>>>> it certainly did plot it correctly and you've not proven otherwise. >>>> >>>> I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the >>>> correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts, as you *proved* >>>> and *graphed*, complete with a horizontal line so everyone would be >>>> sure to see that your kooky equation didn't work, you moron. LOL >>>> >>>> Your kooky equation seems to be a result of you squashing together >>>> parts of the phasor and trigonometric sinewave expressions, because >>>> it's certainly not the correct equation to use. >>>> >>>> SPNAK! >>>> >>>>> it is >>>>> you who cannot answer the simple question regarding at which time in >>>>> seconds that the sine waves that you've conjured would ever >>>>> "constructively interfere" to produce 2550.25. >>>> >>>> You'll have to do the work of proving your kooky sinewave subtraction >>>> equation doesn't work, DildoRider. Given that you cannot even make it >>>> produce the proper constructively-interfered maximum voltage of >>>> 2550.25 volts, there's no way for you to calculate the period of the >>>> resultant, therefore you're forced to either admit you're *wrong*, or >>>> change to using the correct Euler equation and thereby admit you're >>>> *wrong*. >>>> >>>> SPNAK! >>>> >>>>>> which means you're using the *wrong* *equation*, >>>> >>>>> then prove it by posting the *correct* *equation*... >>>> >>>> I did at the beginning of this whole fiasco, and you bleated that it >>>> wasn't the correct equation, then started spamming your bad sinewaves >>>> using your kooky sinewave subtraction equation, despite the fact that >>>> GnuPlot can use the correct equation, as you proved when you posted >>>> about those researchers using it in GnuPlot. >>>> >>>> SPNAK! >>>> >>>>>> and despite you >>>>>> admitting GnuPlot can use the proper Euler sinewave summation >>>>>> equation, >>>> >>>>> it can use whatever tab-delimited data you give it. so just post >>>>> you're >>>>> euler data points and we'll get down to the bottom of this. >>>> >>>> Translation: >>>> "I'm wrong, but don't want to admit it. I'm too stupid to use the >>>> correct Euler equation, but don't want to admit it. So I'll keep >>>> spamming my bad sinewaves because I'm a mathematical moron." LOL >>>> >>>>>> you persist in proving yourself a mathematical moron by >>>>>> insisting on using the *wrong* *equation*. LOL >>>> >>>>> you insist on repetitively and somewhat-schizophrenically bleating out >>>>> that everything is *wrong* while being unable to provide any evidence >>>>> whatsoever that this is the case. is that somehow the "high ground" >>>>> these >>>>> days? >>>> >>>> There are three ways of expressing a sinewave, the trigonometric, >>>> complex exponential and phasor methods. I prefer the phasor method, as >>>> one can not only calculate phase and voltage, one can factor in >>>> impedance, solve for current, etc. >>>> >>>> You appear to prefer the trigonometric method, but take a look at the >>>> proper Euler equation, expressed in the trigonometric expression of a >>>> sinewave, and tell me your equation is correct, DildoRider... do you >>>> see where you've borrowed parts of the phasor expression of a >>>> sinewave, and parts of the trigonometric expression of a sinewave, and >>>> added your kooky correcting factors to try to make it work? Then you >>>> stupidly switched your minus signs to plus signs and bleated >>>> "DAAARRRRHHH! I gots the propur Euler eqooashun now! It don't not work >>>> neither!", thereby *proving* you don't have a fucking clue. And you've >>>> still not demonstrated that you can jigger your kooky equation to even >>>> give the proper output both because your phase is wrong, and the >>>> resultant voltage is wrong. Moron. LOL >>>> >>>> And now, you're reduced to droolbleating "SHOW ME DUH PURDY PICHERS! >>>> <clap clap> DUURRRRHHH! I WANNA SEE DUH PURDY PICHERS!" because you >>>> have no clue how to do it properly yourself. >>>> >>>> SPNAK! >>>> >>>>>>> don't forget... 3-phase *is* separated by 120 degrees instead of >>>>>>> 180. >>>>>>> don't forget that in your maths. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> for extra credit use quaternion maths. LOL >>>> >>>>>> I don't have to graph or calculate a single fucking thing, >>>> >>>>> well, yeah because you're inept and just trying to cover up for it. >>>> >>>> Or I know I'm right, and that you're a mathematical moron. And I know >>>> you'll do far better proving that fact yourself than I could. I mean, >>>> look at all the fuckups you've already made. LOL >>>> >>>>>> you math challenged moron. >>>> >>>>> ironic, as you were just challenged to prove your math. >>>> >>>> You mean the proper Euler equation, in use by every scientist and >>>> engineer and proven since the 1700s, whereas your kooky sinewave >>>> subtraction equation is only used by one delusional and backpedaling >>>> mathematical moron? LOL >>>> >>>>>> All I had to do was prove you *wrong*, which I did >>>>>> by forcing you to prove *yourself* wrong... because I like making my >>>>>> kooks do my work for me. >>>>>> >>>>>> Now get back to work, you slack-jawed mono-browed thick-witted >>>>>> uneducated dolt. You've got a lot more bad sinewaves to spam before I >>>>>> deem you sufficiently embarrassed to allow you to run away with tail >>>>>> tucked. >>>>>> >>>>>> <snicker> >>>> >>>>> did everybody applaud? >>>> >>>> They sure as hell did, but not for you. People just look at the ground >>>> and shuffle their feet in embarrassed silence when it comes to you. >>>> >>>> <snicker> >>>> >>>> Fag. LOL >>>> Idiot. LOL >>>> Moron. LOL >>>> Tranny. LOL >>>> Libtard. LOL >>>> Crackhead. LOL >>>> GableTard. LOL >>>> DildoRider. LOL >>>> Bad Musician. LOL >>>> Stick Figure. LOL >>>> Terrible Liar. LOL >>>> Sinewave Spammer. LOL >>>> Mathematical Moron. LOL >>>> Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL >>>> Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL >>>> Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL >>>> Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL >>>> Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL >>>> Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL >>>> >>> >>> fakey, why did you trim out the following and refuse to comment on it? >>> >>> i eagerly anticipate fakey's answer to what the following *sums* to with >>> his euler summation: >>> >>> V((L1+L2)-N) = sin(2*pi*f*t)*Vp + sin((2*pi*f*t+(4/3)*pi))*Vp >>> >>> OR let f=60 and Vp=170: >>> >>> sin(2*pi*60*t)*170 + sin((2*pi*60*t+(4/3)*pi))*170 >>> >>> i get: >>> >>> http://i.imgur.com/gfm2vfV.png >>> >>> fakey has not only proclaimed that this is the method for calculating >>> the >>> voltage that a load would see across those two conductors but that it >>> *must* be zero volts. >>> >>> his furry-euler summations CAN'T be wrong, he sez. >> >> >> I'm sure glad I have no idea what the hell you guys are talking about. > >now you sound like the tiny voice inside bleaty the spankard's head that >nobody has ever heard from. Whatever, this is not my forte, but I know enough to know you are making him dance like a monkey on meth.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-19 12:29 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <op.yc3b72artm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #630576 |
On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 12:16:29 -0500, Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> wrote: > On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 11:15:03 -0500, "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder > living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), > socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" > <root@127.0.0.1> wrote: > >> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 18:22:38 -0500, Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> >> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 18:13:24 -0500, "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder >>> living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), >>> socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" >>> <root@127.0.0.1> wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 16:03:43 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote >>>> Wrangler >>>> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >>>>> >>>>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka >>>>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop >>>>> Jockey), >>>>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in >>>>> <news:op.yc09xkpxtm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first >>>>> into the wood chipper again: >>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 01:20:45 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood >>>>>> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka >>>>>>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop >>>>>>> Jockey), >>>>>>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in >>>>>>> <news:op.yczn3ab2tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head >>>>>>> first >>>>>>> into the wood chipper again: >>>>> >>>>>>>> <looks at subject> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> okay, so now please go "sum" any two of the 3 phases of standard >>>>>>>> 3-phase >>>>>>>> power and tell me how many volts potential it is at any instant, >>>>>>>> k0oky. >>>>>>>> then "sum" all three. show us the sums. >>>>> >>>>>>> "at any instant" LOL >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You mean the time-varying instantaneous voltage, which varies on >>>>>>> each >>>>>>> hot leg? Moron. LOL >>>>>>> >>>>>>> V(L1-N) = sin(2*pi*f*t)*Vp >>>>>>> V(L2-N) = sin((2*pi*f*t+((4/3)*pi)*Vp >>>>>>> V(L3-N) = sin((2*pi*f*t+((2/3)*pi)*Vp >>>>> >>>>>> hey, those equations look very familiar. you just left out the >>>>>> definitions of f=60 and Vp=120 >>>>>> >>>>>> 120*sin(60*2*pi*x) OR sin(2*pi*60*x)*120 >>>>>> 120*sin(60*2*pi*x+(120*pi/180)) OR sin(2*pi*60*x+((120/180)*pi)*120 >>>>>> 120*sin(60*2*pi*x+(240*pi/180)) OR sin(2*pi*60*x+((240/180)*pi)*120 >>>>> >>>>> Well, given that you can't even reduce a fraction, that pretty much >>>>> proves my point that you're a mathematical moron. LOL >>>>> >>>>> SPNAK! >>>>> >>>>>> you're finally not being a fucktard about correct equations, >>>>> >>>>> I never was. I was only "being a fucktard" about the fact that you're >>>>> using the equations wrong and using the wrong equation, because >>>>> you're >>>>> a mathematical moron who doesn't understand what the equation is >>>>> supposed to do. Moron. LOL >>>>> >>>>>> unlike when >>>>>> you kept insisting that one should both graph and do the math for >>>>>> two >>>>>> 180 >>>>>> degree phase shifted signals by flipping the polarity of one of the >>>>>> signals and "summing" them to get an instantaneous voltage. >>>>> >>>>> That wasn't me "insisting that one should both graph and do the math >>>>> for two 180 degree phase shifted signals by flipping the polarity of >>>>> one of the signals and "summing" them to get an instantaneous >>>>> voltage", that was *you*, you backpedaling moron... or did you forget >>>>> your adding pi to your equation to flip one hot leg by 180 degrees in >>>>> phase? >>>>> >>>>> SPNAK! >>>>> >>>>>> "What does 2 (Dual / Split) Phase Power mean? >>>>>> >>>>>> If you’re not electrically minded, think of 2 (Dual / Split) phase >>>>>> power >>>>>> like a two pedal bicycle where one (pushing leg) or both (pushing >>>>>> legs) >>>>>> can provide power. >>>>>> >>>>>> Dual Phase or Split Phase power is also Single Phase because it’s >>>>>> a >>>>>> two >>>>>> wire Alternating Current (AC ) power circuit. In the US, this is the >>>>>> standard household power arrangement with two (Phase A, Phase B) >>>>>> 120V >>>>>> power wires (180 degrees out of phase with one another) like two >>>>>> bicycle >>>>>> pedals and one neutral wire. This arrangement provides (2) 120V and >>>>>> (1) >>>>>> 240V power circuits. 120V power flows (alternating) between either >>>>>> power >>>>>> wire (through the load) and the neutral wire. 240V power flows >>>>>> (alternating) between the two power wires (through the load)." >>>>>> >>>>>> "If you connected a dual trace oscope's probes' gnds to the Neutral >>>>>> (center tapped wire) and put one probe on phase A and the other on >>>>>> phase B >>>>>> the waveforms would be 180 degrees out of phase. When A peaks >>>>>> positive B >>>>>> peaks negative. So how is it that the A-Neutral and B-Neutral >>>>>> voltages >>>>>> are >>>>>> said to be "in phase"? [Of course, it makes no sense to ask about >>>>>> the >>>>>> phasing of A-B - any voltage is always in phase with itself.]" >>>>> >>>>> Wrong. They'd be oppositely-phased in relation to the >>>>> midpoint-neutral, but they cannot be "out of phase" on the hot legs, >>>>> as connecting directly across the two hot legs gives 240 volts >>>>> *single*-*phase* at 0 degrees, as you have acknowledged. >>>>> >>>>> But thanks for yet again demonstrating your inability to grok how >>>>> split-phase midpoint-neutral electrical systems work, DildoRider. You >>>>> are, after all, the moron who's been calling it "two phase", which is >>>>> just silly. Even Chimpy was laughing at that, and he's as big a moron >>>>> as you are. >>>>> >>>>> SPNAK! >>>>> >>>>>>> Educate yourself, you retard. >>>>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phasor> >>>>>>> <http://white.stanford.edu/teach/index.php/Fourier_transform_math> >>>>>>> <http://www.fourier-series.com/> >>>>> >>>>>> i took engineering in college, thanks. ;) >>>>> >>>>> Oh, then you *did* skip the first day of class when they taught >>>>> Euler's equation, so you could instead suck dicks in a dark alley. >>>>> LOL >>>>> >>>>> SPNAK! >>>>> >>>>>>> That equation in the Stanford link above, based upon Euler's >>>>>>> sinewave >>>>>>> summation equation, allows one to sum *any* number of sinewaves of >>>>>>> *any* frequency and phase. Moron. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> How can you do *any* electronics work and *not* know how to use the >>>>>>> Fourier transform of Euler's equation, given that using complex >>>>>>> phasors allows one to not only calculate voltage but factor in >>>>>>> impedance, current and any other aspect one wants? Unless you're >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> type who solders it together, powers it up and prays for no smoke? >>>>>>> Moron. LOL >>>>> >>>>> <crickets> LOL >>>>> >>>>>>> "standard 3-phase power" LOL >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Do you mean 3-wire delta, 3-wire wye or 4-wire wye? Moron. LOL >>>>> >>>>>> yes, the 3-phase service that powers any of those. >>>>> >>>>> Translation: >>>>> "I... I don't know! I'm in over my head. Don't ask me hard questions >>>>> or I'll start to spam more bad sinewaves with my kooky sinewave >>>>> subtraction equation!" >>>>> >>>>> <snicker> >>>>> >>>>>>> Do you mean a 230 V system, or a 230/400 V system? Moron. LOL >>>>> >>>>>> for now, just 230 >>>>> >>>>>>> My uncle has a high-leg delta center-tap-grounded system at his >>>>>>> business, so he can power his 120 volt loads, his single-phase and >>>>>>> 3-phase 240 volt loads and his 208 volt lighting. Despite the fact >>>>>>> that delta has been supplanted by wye for new installations in the >>>>>>> US >>>>>>> because of improved load balancing, that's "standard 3-phase >>>>>>> power", >>>>>>> too. Moron. LOL >>>>> >>>>>> that's an ideal setup for your uncle. does he have a ball bearing >>>>>> factory, or something? LOL >>>>> >>>>> Or something. LOL >>>>> >>>>>>> But let's not get off the topic of you *proving* your kooky >>>>>>> sinewave >>>>>>> subtraction equation didn't calculate those 6 sinewaves correctly, >>>>> >>>>>> it certainly did plot it correctly and you've not proven otherwise. >>>>> >>>>> I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the >>>>> correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts, as you *proved* >>>>> and *graphed*, complete with a horizontal line so everyone would be >>>>> sure to see that your kooky equation didn't work, you moron. LOL >>>>> >>>>> Your kooky equation seems to be a result of you squashing together >>>>> parts of the phasor and trigonometric sinewave expressions, because >>>>> it's certainly not the correct equation to use. >>>>> >>>>> SPNAK! >>>>> >>>>>> it is >>>>>> you who cannot answer the simple question regarding at which time in >>>>>> seconds that the sine waves that you've conjured would ever >>>>>> "constructively interfere" to produce 2550.25. >>>>> >>>>> You'll have to do the work of proving your kooky sinewave subtraction >>>>> equation doesn't work, DildoRider. Given that you cannot even make it >>>>> produce the proper constructively-interfered maximum voltage of >>>>> 2550.25 volts, there's no way for you to calculate the period of the >>>>> resultant, therefore you're forced to either admit you're *wrong*, or >>>>> change to using the correct Euler equation and thereby admit you're >>>>> *wrong*. >>>>> >>>>> SPNAK! >>>>> >>>>>>> which means you're using the *wrong* *equation*, >>>>> >>>>>> then prove it by posting the *correct* *equation*... >>>>> >>>>> I did at the beginning of this whole fiasco, and you bleated that it >>>>> wasn't the correct equation, then started spamming your bad sinewaves >>>>> using your kooky sinewave subtraction equation, despite the fact that >>>>> GnuPlot can use the correct equation, as you proved when you posted >>>>> about those researchers using it in GnuPlot. >>>>> >>>>> SPNAK! >>>>> >>>>>>> and despite you >>>>>>> admitting GnuPlot can use the proper Euler sinewave summation >>>>>>> equation, >>>>> >>>>>> it can use whatever tab-delimited data you give it. so just post >>>>>> you're >>>>>> euler data points and we'll get down to the bottom of this. >>>>> >>>>> Translation: >>>>> "I'm wrong, but don't want to admit it. I'm too stupid to use the >>>>> correct Euler equation, but don't want to admit it. So I'll keep >>>>> spamming my bad sinewaves because I'm a mathematical moron." LOL >>>>> >>>>>>> you persist in proving yourself a mathematical moron by >>>>>>> insisting on using the *wrong* *equation*. LOL >>>>> >>>>>> you insist on repetitively and somewhat-schizophrenically bleating >>>>>> out >>>>>> that everything is *wrong* while being unable to provide any >>>>>> evidence >>>>>> whatsoever that this is the case. is that somehow the "high ground" >>>>>> these >>>>>> days? >>>>> >>>>> There are three ways of expressing a sinewave, the trigonometric, >>>>> complex exponential and phasor methods. I prefer the phasor method, >>>>> as >>>>> one can not only calculate phase and voltage, one can factor in >>>>> impedance, solve for current, etc. >>>>> >>>>> You appear to prefer the trigonometric method, but take a look at the >>>>> proper Euler equation, expressed in the trigonometric expression of a >>>>> sinewave, and tell me your equation is correct, DildoRider... do you >>>>> see where you've borrowed parts of the phasor expression of a >>>>> sinewave, and parts of the trigonometric expression of a sinewave, >>>>> and >>>>> added your kooky correcting factors to try to make it work? Then you >>>>> stupidly switched your minus signs to plus signs and bleated >>>>> "DAAARRRRHHH! I gots the propur Euler eqooashun now! It don't not >>>>> work >>>>> neither!", thereby *proving* you don't have a fucking clue. And >>>>> you've >>>>> still not demonstrated that you can jigger your kooky equation to >>>>> even >>>>> give the proper output both because your phase is wrong, and the >>>>> resultant voltage is wrong. Moron. LOL >>>>> >>>>> And now, you're reduced to droolbleating "SHOW ME DUH PURDY PICHERS! >>>>> <clap clap> DUURRRRHHH! I WANNA SEE DUH PURDY PICHERS!" because you >>>>> have no clue how to do it properly yourself. >>>>> >>>>> SPNAK! >>>>> >>>>>>>> don't forget... 3-phase *is* separated by 120 degrees instead of >>>>>>>> 180. >>>>>>>> don't forget that in your maths. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> for extra credit use quaternion maths. LOL >>>>> >>>>>>> I don't have to graph or calculate a single fucking thing, >>>>> >>>>>> well, yeah because you're inept and just trying to cover up for it. >>>>> >>>>> Or I know I'm right, and that you're a mathematical moron. And I know >>>>> you'll do far better proving that fact yourself than I could. I mean, >>>>> look at all the fuckups you've already made. LOL >>>>> >>>>>>> you math challenged moron. >>>>> >>>>>> ironic, as you were just challenged to prove your math. >>>>> >>>>> You mean the proper Euler equation, in use by every scientist and >>>>> engineer and proven since the 1700s, whereas your kooky sinewave >>>>> subtraction equation is only used by one delusional and backpedaling >>>>> mathematical moron? LOL >>>>> >>>>>>> All I had to do was prove you *wrong*, which I did >>>>>>> by forcing you to prove *yourself* wrong... because I like making >>>>>>> my >>>>>>> kooks do my work for me. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Now get back to work, you slack-jawed mono-browed thick-witted >>>>>>> uneducated dolt. You've got a lot more bad sinewaves to spam >>>>>>> before I >>>>>>> deem you sufficiently embarrassed to allow you to run away with >>>>>>> tail >>>>>>> tucked. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <snicker> >>>>> >>>>>> did everybody applaud? >>>>> >>>>> They sure as hell did, but not for you. People just look at the >>>>> ground >>>>> and shuffle their feet in embarrassed silence when it comes to you. >>>>> >>>>> <snicker> >>>>> >>>>> Fag. LOL >>>>> Idiot. LOL >>>>> Moron. LOL >>>>> Tranny. LOL >>>>> Libtard. LOL >>>>> Crackhead. LOL >>>>> GableTard. LOL >>>>> DildoRider. LOL >>>>> Bad Musician. LOL >>>>> Stick Figure. LOL >>>>> Terrible Liar. LOL >>>>> Sinewave Spammer. LOL >>>>> Mathematical Moron. LOL >>>>> Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL >>>>> Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL >>>>> Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL >>>>> Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL >>>>> Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL >>>>> Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL >>>>> >>>> >>>> fakey, why did you trim out the following and refuse to comment on it? >>>> >>>> i eagerly anticipate fakey's answer to what the following *sums* to >>>> with >>>> his euler summation: >>>> >>>> V((L1+L2)-N) = sin(2*pi*f*t)*Vp + sin((2*pi*f*t+(4/3)*pi))*Vp >>>> >>>> OR let f=60 and Vp=170: >>>> >>>> sin(2*pi*60*t)*170 + sin((2*pi*60*t+(4/3)*pi))*170 >>>> >>>> i get: >>>> >>>> http://i.imgur.com/gfm2vfV.png >>>> >>>> fakey has not only proclaimed that this is the method for calculating >>>> the >>>> voltage that a load would see across those two conductors but that it >>>> *must* be zero volts. >>>> >>>> his furry-euler summations CAN'T be wrong, he sez. >>> >>> >>> I'm sure glad I have no idea what the hell you guys are talking about. >> >> now you sound like the tiny voice inside bleaty the spankard's head that >> nobody has ever heard from. > > Whatever, this is not my forte, but I know enough to know you are > making him dance like a monkey on meth. i wonder when the methMonkey will bleat again? -- "sines, sines, everywhere there's sines blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind" http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu - FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID: <3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com> ">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics >> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all: >> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) >> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) >> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time: >> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x) Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking *moron*? "The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:"" it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/ http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png "To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each other:" http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf on page 2: ** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A) *COUGH* SPNAK!! - i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII art if you ask nicely. see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com> - Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to: "all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..." <f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com> - On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: <snicker> Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Terrible Liar. LOL Sinewave Spammer. LOL Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL is where my usenet lord and mas-ter can go straight to hell* *hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening. - http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg http://cafepress.com/kooktown http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg - If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :) - if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try: http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2 - http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written, Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd - Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!: $ perl fakeyBot.pl FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you, look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker> You> Robert Michael Wolfe FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks, Robert. <snicker> Robert> you talk about cocks a lot. FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot? Robert> gay sex, mostly... FakeyBot> Fag! (just as useful as the original!) - snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message <b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>: "That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden service. It's not rocket science. _The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my distinct impression was that the "anonymity research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a kiddie pr0n network.) That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation Onymous was just icing on the cake." - Golden Killfile, June 2005 KOTM, November 2006 Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007 Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006 Busted Urinal Award, April 2007 Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008 Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007 AUK Mascot, September 2007
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-20 05:48 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <e80cb943293bfd87b88c4790ecf2f578@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #630469 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.yc1xgmeetm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > fakey, why did you trim out the following and refuse to comment on it? I didn't, you moron. That was a later post than the one I made. I've replied to it separately... but just know that as a kook melts down, it's often common that they lose track of chronology. Now it's happening to you. LOL But I do note you've effectively ignored all those giant whomping SPNAK!s upthread. Why did you do that, DildoRider? LOL > i eagerly anticipate fakey's answer to what the following *sums* to with > his euler summation: > > V((L1+L2)-N) = sin(2*pi*f*t)*Vp + sin((2*pi*f*t+(4/3)*pi))*Vp > > OR let f=60 and Vp=170: > > sin(2*pi*60*t)*170 + sin((2*pi*60*t+(4/3)*pi))*170 For fuck sake, you moron. You can't just take your kooky sinewave subtraction equation, switch out the minus signs with plus signs and stupidly blather about it being the correct equation to use. You've already tried that in the past, remember? Fucking moron. Do it again, and this time, get it right. LOL > i get: > > http://i.imgur.com/gfm2vfV.png Wrong. LOL > fakey has not only proclaimed that this is the method for calculating the > voltage that a load would see across those two conductors but that it > *must* be zero volts. > > his furry-euler summations CAN'T be wrong, he sez. That's not the Euler sinewave summation equation you're using, you fucking moron. I've already posted the correct equation, you just refuse to use it... likely because you're too stoooopid to figure it out. LOL Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Terrible Liar. LOL Sinewave Spammer. LOL Mathematical Moron. LOL Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL -- Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey) 5907 Stanton Ave. Pittsburgh, PA (412) 853-6395 (412) 799-0532 (412) 665-8289 (412) 404-8757 DildoRider admits he's stoooopid: MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com> ================================================= >> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's >> damaged your brain, DildoRider. > then it appears that you like shooting fish in > barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are. Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell. <snicker> ================================================= DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com> ================================================= > so what you're saying is that your targets for attack > have to be really stupid or else you can't manage? ================================================= DildoRider admits much more about himself: MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com> ================================================= "absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly, toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless" ================================================= This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake. 150 IQ? LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-17 15:49 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <na2mdv$h6v$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #630122 |
On 17/02/2016 12:30 PM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > It'd have a periodicity of 4,444,525,800. M<ushroom cloud> *headdesk* Unbelievable. Ol' ko0ky here can calculate an LCM accurately but mixes up his periods with his frequencies. Some sort of focal brain lesion? -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-17 13:26 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.312e855b45164fef98c7c7@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #630198 |
In article <na2mdv$h6v$3@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01@gmail.invalid says... > > On 17/02/2016 12:30 PM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > > > It'd have a periodicity of 4,444,525,800. M<ushroom cloud> > > *headdesk* > > Unbelievable. Ol' ko0ky here can calculate an LCM accurately but mixes > up his periods with his frequencies. Some sort of focal brain lesion? It would appear that Fakey has frequent periods like a little bitch boy. HTH. -- Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote (Post-Burnore) Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame Copyright © 2016 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-18 06:52 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <2651438e79ce2f1ec02692364c56ea78@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #630198 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Ko0O0oki kensi the LunkHeaded LibTard, in <news:na2mdv$h6v$3@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On 17/02/2016 12:30 PM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler > Emeritus wrote: >> It'd have a periodicity of 4,444,525,800. Moron. Do you even know how >> to calculate the periodicity of those sinewaves after vector summing >> their Fourier transformed phasors? I guess not, if you had to ask. LOL > *headdesk* > > Unbelievable. Ol' ko0ky here can calculate an LCM accurately but mixes > up his periods with his frequencies. Some sort of focal brain lesion? And just where did I do that, you moronic halfwit? Or do you not realize that the periodicity of a sinewave in cycles per second and graphed in seconds would have a periodicity denoted in *seconds* because the resultant frequency is the reciprocal of the LCM of the periodicity, you math challenged idiotic goof? IOW, you know that after one period of each sinewave, each sinewave will repeat. In order for the resultant sinewave to repeat, all six of the tributary sinewave's periods must repeat. This only happens after an integer number of periods for each of the sinewaves, which corresponds to the LCM of the tributary sinewave's periods. But then, you're that math challenged moron who got spanked hard, as outlined in my .sig, so your confusion is understandable. SPNAK! -- Kensi the moron wrote: ================================ The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so the curvature is 4*pi ================================ Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi. Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi Therefore, r = 0.28209479176 Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the units. The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect. Kensi the moron was corrected: ================================ Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you backpedal, LunkHead. You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore = (4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original "The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*? ================================ But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry problems. Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is "science fiction" and "a howler". In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold. He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature, and thus causing gravity to *repel*. Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of magnetic attraction. Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work, and therefore a universe which could not exist. Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation". Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow at 489 F. Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of "blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how spectral absorption and emission works. Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared atmospheric window. The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same moron continues to cling to his delusions. Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite. Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a slumpy dumpy frumpy lumpy loser trying to pretend that he's intelligent... and failing badly. That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that struggles (and fails) to understand reality.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 7 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7]
Back to top | Article view | alt.usenet.kooks
csiph-web