Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.usage.english > #578093 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-12-30 18:42 +0000 |
| Last post | 2015-12-31 16:46 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 135 — 24 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.usage.english
15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2015-12-30 18:42 +0000
Re: 15 million fools "John Varela" <newlamps@verizon.net> - 2015-12-30 19:12 +0000
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2015-12-30 19:21 +0000
Re: 15 million fools Simon Grushka <s.grushka83@gmail.com> - 2016-01-01 14:14 -0800
Re: 15 million fools Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> - 2015-12-30 22:19 -0500
Re: 15 million fools James Hogg <Jas.Hogg@gOUTmail.com> - 2015-12-31 09:22 +0100
Re: 15 million fools "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@verizon.net> - 2015-12-31 04:31 -0800
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2015-12-31 17:13 +0000
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2015-12-31 17:12 +0000
Re: 15 million fools Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> - 2015-12-31 22:00 -0500
Re: 15 million fools Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org.invalid> - 2016-01-01 17:47 +1100
Re: 15 million fools musika <mUs1Ka@NOSPAMexcite.com> - 2016-01-01 08:16 +0000
Re: 15 million fools Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org.invalid> - 2016-01-01 19:30 +1100
Re: 15 million fools "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@verizon.net> - 2016-01-01 06:41 -0800
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-01 14:59 +0000
Re: 15 million fools GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-01 19:44 +0000
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-01 19:48 +0000
Re: 15 million fools GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-01 22:24 +0000
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-01 22:46 +0000
Re: 15 million fools GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-02 12:28 +0000
Re: 15 million fools Janet <nobody@home.org> - 2016-01-02 15:04 +0000
Re: 15 million fools Tony Cooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 12:03 -0500
Re: 15 million fools GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-02 20:51 +0000
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-02 20:58 +0000
Re: 15 million fools GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-04 09:02 +0000
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-04 19:14 +0000
Re: 15 million fools Athel Cornish-Bowden <acornish@imm.cnrs.fr> - 2016-01-03 19:14 +0100
Re: 15 million fools the Omrud <usenet.omrud@gmail.com> - 2016-01-03 19:19 +0000
Re: 15 million fools Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org.invalid> - 2016-01-04 09:02 +1100
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-01 19:57 +0000
Re: 15 million fools pensive hamster <pensive_hamster@hotmail.co.uk> - 2016-01-01 12:10 -0800
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-01 20:18 +0000
Re: 15 million fools GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-01 22:27 +0000
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-01 22:47 +0000
Re: 15 million fools "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@verizon.net> - 2016-01-01 20:17 -0800
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-02 20:48 +0000
Re: 15 million fools "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@verizon.net> - 2016-01-01 12:55 -0800
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-01 21:05 +0000
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-01 21:09 +0000
Re: 15 million fools GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-01 22:29 +0000
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-01 22:51 +0000
Re: 15 million fools GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-02 12:29 +0000
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-02 20:53 +0000
Re: 15 million fools GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-04 09:03 +0000
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-04 19:14 +0000
Re: 15 million fools GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-05 10:31 +0000
Re: 15 million fools "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@verizon.net> - 2016-01-05 07:12 -0800
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-06 00:14 +0000
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-06 00:14 +0000
Re: 15 million fools bill van <billvan@delete.shaw.ca> - 2016-01-01 17:02 -0800
Re: 15 million fools musika <mUs1Ka@NOSPAMexcite.com> - 2016-01-02 01:43 +0000
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-02 20:42 +0000
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-01 14:58 +0000
Re: 15 million fools Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> - 2016-01-01 21:52 -0500
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-02 20:42 +0000
Re: 15 million fools Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> - 2016-01-02 21:54 -0500
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-03 16:09 +0000
Re: 15 million fools Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> - 2016-01-01 21:47 -0500
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-02 20:42 +0000
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-01 14:57 +0000
Re: 15 million fools Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> - 2016-01-01 21:54 -0500
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-02 20:44 +0000
Re: 15 million fools Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> - 2016-01-02 21:55 -0500
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-03 16:10 +0000
Re: 15 million fools "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@verizon.net> - 2016-01-03 11:09 -0800
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-03 19:27 +0000
Re: 15 million fools Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> - 2016-01-03 17:32 -0500
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-04 00:25 +0000
Re: 15 million fools Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> - 2016-01-04 11:56 -0500
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-04 17:21 +0000
Re: 15 million fools Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> - 2016-01-04 17:44 -0500
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-04 23:38 +0000
Re: 15 million fools Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> - 2016-01-04 23:12 -0500
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-05 22:16 +0000
Re: 15 million fools Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> - 2016-01-05 22:04 -0500
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-06 20:09 +0000
Re: 15 million fools pensive hamster <pensive_hamster@hotmail.co.uk> - 2016-01-06 11:10 -0800
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2015-12-31 17:11 +0000
Re: 15 million fools Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> - 2015-12-31 22:36 -0500
Re: 15 million fools Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org.invalid> - 2016-01-01 18:12 +1100
Re: 15 million fools "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@verizon.net> - 2016-01-01 06:48 -0800
Re: 15 million fools Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> - 2016-01-01 22:17 -0500
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-01 11:00 +0000
Re: 15 million fools GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-01 19:46 +0000
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-01 19:54 +0000
Re: 15 million fools Richard Yates <richard@yatesguitar.com> - 2016-01-01 12:27 -0800
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-01 20:34 +0000
Re: 15 million fools "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@verizon.net> - 2016-01-01 12:57 -0800
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-01 21:05 +0000
Re: 15 million fools Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> - 2016-01-01 22:41 -0500
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-02 20:46 +0000
Re: 15 million fools Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> - 2016-01-02 21:52 -0500
Re: 15 million fools RH Draney <dadoctah@cox.net> - 2016-01-02 22:03 -0700
Re: 15 million fools "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@verizon.net> - 2016-01-02 21:48 -0800
Re: 15 million fools Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org.invalid> - 2016-01-03 17:34 +1100
Re: 15 million fools Janet <nobody@home.org> - 2016-01-03 11:31 +0000
Re: 15 million fools Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> - 2016-01-03 17:40 -0500
Re: 15 million fools Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org.invalid> - 2016-01-04 10:13 +1100
Re: 15 million fools Jerry Friedman <jerry_friedman@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-03 16:15 -0800
Re: 15 million fools Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> - 2016-01-05 16:43 -0500
Re: 15 million fools Tony Cooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com> - 2016-01-05 17:36 -0500
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-03 18:36 +0000
Re: 15 million fools "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@verizon.net> - 2016-01-03 11:11 -0800
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-03 19:28 +0000
Re: 15 million fools "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@verizon.net> - 2016-01-03 13:47 -0800
Re: 15 million fools "Peter Duncanson [BrE]" <mail@peterduncanson.net> - 2016-01-04 00:07 +0000
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-04 00:31 +0000
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-04 00:29 +0000
Re: 15 million fools GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-04 09:13 +0000
Re: 15 million fools "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@verizon.net> - 2016-01-04 04:17 -0800
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-04 19:16 +0000
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-04 19:15 +0000
Re: 15 million fools GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-05 10:24 +0000
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-06 00:13 +0000
Re: 15 million fools GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-06 13:42 +0000
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-06 19:04 +0000
Re: 15 million fools "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@verizon.net> - 2016-01-04 04:19 -0800
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-04 19:16 +0000
Re: 15 million fools "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@verizon.net> - 2016-01-04 11:58 -0800
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-04 23:30 +0000
Re: 15 million fools charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> - 2016-01-04 20:02 +0000
Re: 15 million fools Peter Young <pnyoung@ormail.co.uk> - 2016-01-04 20:10 +0000
Re: 15 million fools "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@verizon.net> - 2016-01-04 13:17 -0800
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-04 23:31 +0000
Re: 15 million fools Reinhold {Rey} Aman <aman@sonic.net> - 2016-01-03 18:18 -0800
Re: 15 million fools Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> - 2016-01-03 17:54 -0500
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-04 00:27 +0000
Re: 15 million fools Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> - 2016-01-04 17:58 -0500
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-04 23:40 +0000
Re: 15 million fools GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-04 09:06 +0000
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-04 19:15 +0000
Re: 15 million fools Charles Bishop <ctbishop@earthlink.net> - 2016-01-02 17:29 -0800
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2016-01-03 16:09 +0000
Re: 15 million fools CDB <bellemarecd@gmail.com> - 2015-12-31 08:31 -0500
Re: 15 million fools "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> - 2015-12-31 16:46 +0000
Page 3 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 Next page →
| From | "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-01 22:51 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <op.yak0f0sh86ebyl@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #578435 |
On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 22:29:05 -0000, GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> wrote: > On 01/01/2016 20:55, Peter T. Daniels wrote: >> On Friday, January 1, 2016 at 9:59:05 AM UTC-5, Mr Macaw wrote: >>> On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 14:41:45 -0000, Peter T. Daniels <grammatim@verizon.net> wrote: >> >>>> You're not suggesting that "Mr. B1ack" is any better, are you? she came >>>> up with "Blinglish" and has now described it in disturbingly racist terms. >>>> Where do the crossposts come from? >>> >>> Why do you find racism disturbing? Clearly one race >> >> What is a "race"? >> >>> must be better than the others, >> >> How is that "clear"? >> >>> so that race should quench all others to improve the world for us. >> >> How is reducing genetic variation (in any species) an "improvement"? > > His heroes thought it was desirable, back in the 1930s. Read up on Charles Darwin. Now tell me why it shouldn't be helped along. > And someone now shouts "GODWIN!" and hopefully this pointless thread > will be over. That rule is very pointless. -- My sex life is so bad that when I called one of those phone sex lines, a voice came on and said, "Not tonight. I have an earache."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-02 12:29 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <depu68Fj868U5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #578439 |
On 01/01/2016 22:51, Mr Macaw wrote: > On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 22:29:05 -0000, GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> wrote: > >> On 01/01/2016 20:55, Peter T. Daniels wrote: >>> On Friday, January 1, 2016 at 9:59:05 AM UTC-5, Mr Macaw wrote: >>>> On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 14:41:45 -0000, Peter T. Daniels >>>> <grammatim@verizon.net> wrote: >>> >>>>> You're not suggesting that "Mr. B1ack" is any better, are you? she >>>>> came >>>>> up with "Blinglish" and has now described it in disturbingly racist >>>>> terms. >>>>> Where do the crossposts come from? >>>> >>>> Why do you find racism disturbing? Clearly one race >>> >>> What is a "race"? >>> >>>> must be better than the others, >>> >>> How is that "clear"? >>> >>>> so that race should quench all others to improve the world for us. >>> >>> How is reducing genetic variation (in any species) an "improvement"? >> >> His heroes thought it was desirable, back in the 1930s. > > Read up on Charles Darwin. Now tell me why it shouldn't be helped along. Who gets to decide who stays and who goes? -- Gordon Davie Edinburgh, Scotland
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-02 20:53 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <op.yampnnms86ebyl@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #578555 |
On Sat, 02 Jan 2016 12:29:58 -0000, GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> wrote: > On 01/01/2016 22:51, Mr Macaw wrote: >> On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 22:29:05 -0000, GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> wrote: >> >>> On 01/01/2016 20:55, Peter T. Daniels wrote: >>>> On Friday, January 1, 2016 at 9:59:05 AM UTC-5, Mr Macaw wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 14:41:45 -0000, Peter T. Daniels >>>>> <grammatim@verizon.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> You're not suggesting that "Mr. B1ack" is any better, are you? she >>>>>> came >>>>>> up with "Blinglish" and has now described it in disturbingly racist >>>>>> terms. >>>>>> Where do the crossposts come from? >>>>> >>>>> Why do you find racism disturbing? Clearly one race >>>> >>>> What is a "race"? >>>> >>>>> must be better than the others, >>>> >>>> How is that "clear"? >>>> >>>>> so that race should quench all others to improve the world for us. >>>> >>>> How is reducing genetic variation (in any species) an "improvement"? >>> >>> His heroes thought it was desirable, back in the 1930s. >> >> Read up on Charles Darwin. Now tell me why it shouldn't be helped along. > > Who gets to decide who stays and who goes? The superior ones. -- Reason to smile: Every 7 minutes of every day, someone in an aerobics class pulls a hamstring.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-04 09:03 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <deuqr6FqqdnU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #578695 |
On 02/01/2016 20:53, Mr Macaw wrote: > On Sat, 02 Jan 2016 12:29:58 -0000, GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> wrote: > >> On 01/01/2016 22:51, Mr Macaw wrote: >>> On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 22:29:05 -0000, GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 01/01/2016 20:55, Peter T. Daniels wrote: >>>>> On Friday, January 1, 2016 at 9:59:05 AM UTC-5, Mr Macaw wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 14:41:45 -0000, Peter T. Daniels >>>>>> <grammatim@verizon.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> You're not suggesting that "Mr. B1ack" is any better, are you? she >>>>>>> came >>>>>>> up with "Blinglish" and has now described it in disturbingly racist >>>>>>> terms. >>>>>>> Where do the crossposts come from? >>>>>> >>>>>> Why do you find racism disturbing? Clearly one race >>>>> >>>>> What is a "race"? >>>>> >>>>>> must be better than the others, >>>>> >>>>> How is that "clear"? >>>>> >>>>>> so that race should quench all others to improve the world for us. >>>>> >>>>> How is reducing genetic variation (in any species) an "improvement"? >>>> >>>> His heroes thought it was desirable, back in the 1930s. >>> >>> Read up on Charles Darwin. Now tell me why it shouldn't be helped >>> along. >> >> Who gets to decide who stays and who goes? > > The superior ones. > Circular argument. -- Gordon Davie Edinburgh, Scotland
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-04 19:14 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <op.yaqae10386ebyl@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #579039 |
On Mon, 04 Jan 2016 09:03:33 -0000, GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> wrote: > On 02/01/2016 20:53, Mr Macaw wrote: >> On Sat, 02 Jan 2016 12:29:58 -0000, GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> wrote: >> >>> On 01/01/2016 22:51, Mr Macaw wrote: >>>> On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 22:29:05 -0000, GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 01/01/2016 20:55, Peter T. Daniels wrote: >>>>>> On Friday, January 1, 2016 at 9:59:05 AM UTC-5, Mr Macaw wrote: >>>>>>> On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 14:41:45 -0000, Peter T. Daniels >>>>>>> <grammatim@verizon.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>> You're not suggesting that "Mr. B1ack" is any better, are you? she >>>>>>>> came >>>>>>>> up with "Blinglish" and has now described it in disturbingly racist >>>>>>>> terms. >>>>>>>> Where do the crossposts come from? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why do you find racism disturbing? Clearly one race >>>>>> >>>>>> What is a "race"? >>>>>> >>>>>>> must be better than the others, >>>>>> >>>>>> How is that "clear"? >>>>>> >>>>>>> so that race should quench all others to improve the world for us. >>>>>> >>>>>> How is reducing genetic variation (in any species) an "improvement"? >>>>> >>>>> His heroes thought it was desirable, back in the 1930s. >>>> >>>> Read up on Charles Darwin. Now tell me why it shouldn't be helped >>>> along. >>> >>> Who gets to decide who stays and who goes? >> >> The superior ones. >> > > Circular argument. Why? -- Murphy says to Paddy, "What ya talkin into an envelope for?" "I'm sending a voicemail ya thick sod!"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-05 10:31 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <df1kbbFicsoU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #579148 |
On 04/01/2016 19:14, Mr Macaw wrote: > On Mon, 04 Jan 2016 09:03:33 -0000, GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> wrote: > >> On 02/01/2016 20:53, Mr Macaw wrote: >>> On Sat, 02 Jan 2016 12:29:58 -0000, GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 01/01/2016 22:51, Mr Macaw wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 22:29:05 -0000, GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 01/01/2016 20:55, Peter T. Daniels wrote: >>>>>>> On Friday, January 1, 2016 at 9:59:05 AM UTC-5, Mr Macaw wrote: >>>>>>>> On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 14:41:45 -0000, Peter T. Daniels >>>>>>>> <grammatim@verizon.net> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You're not suggesting that "Mr. B1ack" is any better, are you? she >>>>>>>>> came >>>>>>>>> up with "Blinglish" and has now described it in disturbingly >>>>>>>>> racist >>>>>>>>> terms. >>>>>>>>> Where do the crossposts come from? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Why do you find racism disturbing? Clearly one race >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What is a "race"? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> must be better than the others, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> How is that "clear"? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> so that race should quench all others to improve the world for us. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> How is reducing genetic variation (in any species) an "improvement"? >>>>>> >>>>>> His heroes thought it was desirable, back in the 1930s. >>>>> >>>>> Read up on Charles Darwin. Now tell me why it shouldn't be helped >>>>> along. >>>> >>>> Who gets to decide who stays and who goes? >>> >>> The superior ones. >>> >> >> Circular argument. > > Why? > I asked who gets to decide who is superior. You replied "the superior ones". But, if you want to do it that way, then since I am clearly superior to you then I rule that you be removed from the gene pool for the benefit of Mankind. Please have your financial affairs in order by the weekend when the van will come to collect you. -- Gordon Davie Edinburgh, Scotland
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@verizon.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-05 07:12 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <67f414a0-352e-4f15-b548-2fd71141b7cd@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #579363 |
On Tuesday, January 5, 2016 at 5:31:10 AM UTC-5, GordonD wrote: > On 04/01/2016 19:14, Mr Macaw wrote: > > On Mon, 04 Jan 2016 09:03:33 -0000, GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> wrote: > >> On 02/01/2016 20:53, Mr Macaw wrote: > >>> On Sat, 02 Jan 2016 12:29:58 -0000, GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> > >>> wrote: > >>>> Who gets to decide who stays and who goes? > >>> The superior ones. > >> Circular argument. > > Why? > > I asked who gets to decide who is superior. You replied "the superior ones". > > But, if you want to do it that way, then since I am clearly superior to > you then I rule that you be removed from the gene pool for the benefit > of Mankind. Please have your financial affairs in order by the weekend > when the van will come to collect you. Removal from the gene pool can be accomplished with a simple sterilization, but that offers no benefit to the newsgroup.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-06 00:14 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <op.yasiysq386ebyl@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #579417 |
On Tue, 05 Jan 2016 15:12:53 -0000, Peter T. Daniels <grammatim@verizon.net> wrote: > On Tuesday, January 5, 2016 at 5:31:10 AM UTC-5, GordonD wrote: >> On 04/01/2016 19:14, Mr Macaw wrote: >> > On Mon, 04 Jan 2016 09:03:33 -0000, GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> wrote: >> >> On 02/01/2016 20:53, Mr Macaw wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 02 Jan 2016 12:29:58 -0000, GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> >> >>> wrote: > >> >>>> Who gets to decide who stays and who goes? >> >>> The superior ones. >> >> Circular argument. >> > Why? >> >> I asked who gets to decide who is superior. You replied "the superior ones". >> >> But, if you want to do it that way, then since I am clearly superior to >> you then I rule that you be removed from the gene pool for the benefit >> of Mankind. Please have your financial affairs in order by the weekend >> when the van will come to collect you. > > Removal from the gene pool can be accomplished with a simple sterilization, > but that offers no benefit to the newsgroup. You just want to get your hands on my reproductive organs! -- A budget is just a method of worrying before you spend money, as well as afterwards.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-06 00:14 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <op.yasix4ml86ebyl@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #579363 |
On Tue, 05 Jan 2016 10:31:05 -0000, GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> wrote: > On 04/01/2016 19:14, Mr Macaw wrote: >> On Mon, 04 Jan 2016 09:03:33 -0000, GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> wrote: >> >>> On 02/01/2016 20:53, Mr Macaw wrote: >>>> On Sat, 02 Jan 2016 12:29:58 -0000, GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 01/01/2016 22:51, Mr Macaw wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 22:29:05 -0000, GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 01/01/2016 20:55, Peter T. Daniels wrote: >>>>>>>> On Friday, January 1, 2016 at 9:59:05 AM UTC-5, Mr Macaw wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 14:41:45 -0000, Peter T. Daniels >>>>>>>>> <grammatim@verizon.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You're not suggesting that "Mr. B1ack" is any better, are you? she >>>>>>>>>> came >>>>>>>>>> up with "Blinglish" and has now described it in disturbingly >>>>>>>>>> racist >>>>>>>>>> terms. >>>>>>>>>> Where do the crossposts come from? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Why do you find racism disturbing? Clearly one race >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What is a "race"? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> must be better than the others, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> How is that "clear"? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> so that race should quench all others to improve the world for us. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> How is reducing genetic variation (in any species) an "improvement"? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> His heroes thought it was desirable, back in the 1930s. >>>>>> >>>>>> Read up on Charles Darwin. Now tell me why it shouldn't be helped >>>>>> along. >>>>> >>>>> Who gets to decide who stays and who goes? >>>> >>>> The superior ones. >>>> >>> >>> Circular argument. >> >> Why? > > I asked who gets to decide who is superior. You replied "the superior ones". > > But, if you want to do it that way, then since I am clearly superior to > you then I rule that you be removed from the gene pool for the benefit > of Mankind. Please have your financial affairs in order by the weekend > when the van will come to collect you. Superiority can be measured objectively. -- Q: What's the difference between an Irish funeral and an Irish wedding? A: One less drunk.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | bill van <billvan@delete.shaw.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-01 17:02 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <billvan-E08C94.17022101012016@shawnews.vc.shawcable.net> |
| In reply to | #578435 |
In article <deoctjF80cqU4@mid.individual.net>, GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> wrote: > On 01/01/2016 20:55, Peter T. Daniels wrote: > > On Friday, January 1, 2016 at 9:59:05 AM UTC-5, Mr Macaw wrote: > >> On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 14:41:45 -0000, Peter T. Daniels > >> <grammatim@verizon.net> wrote: > > > >>> You're not suggesting that "Mr. B1ack" is any better, are you? she came > >>> up with "Blinglish" and has now described it in disturbingly racist > >>> terms. > >>> Where do the crossposts come from? > >> > >> Why do you find racism disturbing? Clearly one race > > > > What is a "race"? > > > >> must be better than the others, > > > > How is that "clear"? > > > >> so that race should quench all others to improve the world for us. > > > > How is reducing genetic variation (in any species) an "improvement"? > > His heroes thought it was desirable, back in the 1930s. > > And someone now shouts "GODWIN!" and hopefully this pointless thread > will be over. Just shouting "Tough Guy" should do it. This troll was in so many kill-files or on ignore status that he wasn't getting any action. He picked a new name and suddenly he's got a bunch of people arguing about racial superiority. He's a happy troll again. -- bill
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | musika <mUs1Ka@NOSPAMexcite.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-02 01:43 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <n679qc$c18$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #578456 |
On 02/01/2016 01:02, bill van wrote: > Just shouting "Tough Guy" should do it. This troll was in so many > kill-files or on ignore status that he wasn't getting any action. He > picked a new name and suddenly he's got a bunch of people arguing about > racial superiority. He's a happy troll again. > Some people never learn.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-02 20:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <op.yamo4d0u86ebyl@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #578456 |
On Sat, 02 Jan 2016 01:02:21 -0000, bill van <billvan@delete.shaw.ca> wrote: > In article <deoctjF80cqU4@mid.individual.net>, > GordonD <g.davie@btinternet.com> wrote: > >> On 01/01/2016 20:55, Peter T. Daniels wrote: >> > On Friday, January 1, 2016 at 9:59:05 AM UTC-5, Mr Macaw wrote: >> >> On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 14:41:45 -0000, Peter T. Daniels >> >> <grammatim@verizon.net> wrote: >> > >> >>> You're not suggesting that "Mr. B1ack" is any better, are you? she came >> >>> up with "Blinglish" and has now described it in disturbingly racist >> >>> terms. >> >>> Where do the crossposts come from? >> >> >> >> Why do you find racism disturbing? Clearly one race >> > >> > What is a "race"? >> > >> >> must be better than the others, >> > >> > How is that "clear"? >> > >> >> so that race should quench all others to improve the world for us. >> > >> > How is reducing genetic variation (in any species) an "improvement"? >> >> His heroes thought it was desirable, back in the 1930s. >> >> And someone now shouts "GODWIN!" and hopefully this pointless thread >> will be over. > > Just shouting "Tough Guy" should do it. This troll was in so many > kill-files or on ignore status that he wasn't getting any action. He > picked a new name and suddenly he's got a bunch of people arguing about > racial superiority. He's a happy troll again. Bullshit. I change name because I fel like it. It has no effect on killfiles because everybody knows it's me. And I don't troll, I disagree with majority opinions, and pathetic people can't handle that. -- Some people's brains are purely for life support purposes only.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-01 14:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <op.yakei8wf86ebyl@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #578262 |
On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 06:47:13 -0000, Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org.invalid> wrote: > On 2016-Jan-01 14:00, Mr. B1ack wrote: >> On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 17:12:47 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote: > >>> I'm never sure if I'd rescue someone from drowning. If I do, it shows >>> I'm braver than all the other pathetic people stood watching. But.... the >>> guy drowning should have learnt to swim properly, so why should I >>> save him? >> >> Tisk ... all about YOU ....... >> >> Seems you were never schooled in the Golden Rule, the >> foundation of ethics - empathy 101. > > Buck Buck Bacaw revealed long ago that he is a supporter of the British > National Party, a cesspit designed to attract sociopaths. Not that I > blame Britain for that; every country seems to have something equivalent. The BNP simply wants religious nuts out of Britain. Why do you like religious nutters? Do you believe in the tooth fairy? Grow up ffs. -- Sex is one of the most wholesome, beautiful and natural experiences that money can buy.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-01 21:52 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <2iee8b5gqknmutn9clc9q4sq88oa5ujitt@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #578334 |
On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 14:58:10 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote: >On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 06:47:13 -0000, Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org.invalid> wrote: > >> On 2016-Jan-01 14:00, Mr. B1ack wrote: >>> On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 17:12:47 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote: >> >>>> I'm never sure if I'd rescue someone from drowning. If I do, it shows >>>> I'm braver than all the other pathetic people stood watching. But.... the >>>> guy drowning should have learnt to swim properly, so why should I >>>> save him? >>> >>> Tisk ... all about YOU ....... >>> >>> Seems you were never schooled in the Golden Rule, the >>> foundation of ethics - empathy 101. >> >> Buck Buck Bacaw revealed long ago that he is a supporter of the British >> National Party, a cesspit designed to attract sociopaths. Not that I >> blame Britain for that; every country seems to have something equivalent. > >The BNP simply wants religious nuts out of Britain. Why do you >like religious nutters? Do you believe in the tooth fairy? Grow up ffs. Out of Britain and to WHERE exactly ... ? You already sent all those damned Puritans and other religious nuts over to the colonies and they've been an everlasting affliction ! So keep your Syrians - we don't need people even MORE stuck-up than the Puritans over on our side of the pond.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-02 20:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <op.yamo5nij86ebyl@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #578473 |
On Sat, 02 Jan 2016 02:52:29 -0000, Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> wrote: > On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 14:58:10 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 06:47:13 -0000, Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org.invalid> wrote: >> >>> On 2016-Jan-01 14:00, Mr. B1ack wrote: >>>> On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 17:12:47 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote: >>> >>>>> I'm never sure if I'd rescue someone from drowning. If I do, it shows >>>>> I'm braver than all the other pathetic people stood watching. But.... the >>>>> guy drowning should have learnt to swim properly, so why should I >>>>> save him? >>>> >>>> Tisk ... all about YOU ....... >>>> >>>> Seems you were never schooled in the Golden Rule, the >>>> foundation of ethics - empathy 101. >>> >>> Buck Buck Bacaw revealed long ago that he is a supporter of the British >>> National Party, a cesspit designed to attract sociopaths. Not that I >>> blame Britain for that; every country seems to have something equivalent. >> >> The BNP simply wants religious nuts out of Britain. Why do you >> like religious nutters? Do you believe in the tooth fairy? Grow up ffs. > > Out of Britain and to WHERE exactly ... ? You already sent > all those damned Puritans and other religious nuts over to > the colonies and they've been an everlasting affliction ! So > keep your Syrians - we don't need people even MORE > stuck-up than the Puritans over on our side of the pond. To their own country. -- Fellows, it's often easier to just give in to your wife. I mean, what's your word against thousands of hers?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-02 21:54 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <k83h8blo3k6gtv3brresceii2adoo0dv5f@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #578679 |
On Sat, 02 Jan 2016 20:42:49 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote: >On Sat, 02 Jan 2016 02:52:29 -0000, Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> wrote: > >> On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 14:58:10 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 06:47:13 -0000, Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> On 2016-Jan-01 14:00, Mr. B1ack wrote: >>>>> On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 17:12:47 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> I'm never sure if I'd rescue someone from drowning. If I do, it shows >>>>>> I'm braver than all the other pathetic people stood watching. But.... the >>>>>> guy drowning should have learnt to swim properly, so why should I >>>>>> save him? >>>>> >>>>> Tisk ... all about YOU ....... >>>>> >>>>> Seems you were never schooled in the Golden Rule, the >>>>> foundation of ethics - empathy 101. >>>> >>>> Buck Buck Bacaw revealed long ago that he is a supporter of the British >>>> National Party, a cesspit designed to attract sociopaths. Not that I >>>> blame Britain for that; every country seems to have something equivalent. >>> >>> The BNP simply wants religious nuts out of Britain. Why do you >>> like religious nutters? Do you believe in the tooth fairy? Grow up ffs. >> >> Out of Britain and to WHERE exactly ... ? You already sent >> all those damned Puritans and other religious nuts over to >> the colonies and they've been an everlasting affliction ! So >> keep your Syrians - we don't need people even MORE >> stuck-up than the Puritans over on our side of the pond. > >To their own country. Hmm ... seems to have exploded alas .............. Maybe the Chinese can build them a nice new island ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-03 16:09 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <op.yan66pwf86ebyl@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #578765 |
On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 02:54:42 -0000, Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> wrote: > On Sat, 02 Jan 2016 20:42:49 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote: > >> On Sat, 02 Jan 2016 02:52:29 -0000, Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 14:58:10 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 06:47:13 -0000, Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2016-Jan-01 14:00, Mr. B1ack wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 17:12:47 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> I'm never sure if I'd rescue someone from drowning. If I do, it shows >>>>>>> I'm braver than all the other pathetic people stood watching. But.... the >>>>>>> guy drowning should have learnt to swim properly, so why should I >>>>>>> save him? >>>>>> >>>>>> Tisk ... all about YOU ....... >>>>>> >>>>>> Seems you were never schooled in the Golden Rule, the >>>>>> foundation of ethics - empathy 101. >>>>> >>>>> Buck Buck Bacaw revealed long ago that he is a supporter of the British >>>>> National Party, a cesspit designed to attract sociopaths. Not that I >>>>> blame Britain for that; every country seems to have something equivalent. >>>> >>>> The BNP simply wants religious nuts out of Britain. Why do you >>>> like religious nutters? Do you believe in the tooth fairy? Grow up ffs. >>> >>> Out of Britain and to WHERE exactly ... ? You already sent >>> all those damned Puritans and other religious nuts over to >>> the colonies and they've been an everlasting affliction ! So >>> keep your Syrians - we don't need people even MORE >>> stuck-up than the Puritans over on our side of the pond. >> >> To their own country. > > Hmm ... seems to have exploded alas .............. Didn't they get told as kids not to play with semtex? > Maybe the Chinese can build them a nice new island ? Underwater preferably. -- On going to war over religion: You're basically killing each other to see who's got the better imaginary friend. -- Richard Jeni
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-01 21:47 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ifee8bhc7g0p8povg44mqifo6k6jgiaqhh@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #578262 |
On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 17:47:13 +1100, Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org.invalid> wrote: >On 2016-Jan-01 14:00, Mr. B1ack wrote: >> On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 17:12:47 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote: > >>> I'm never sure if I'd rescue someone from drowning. If I do, it shows >>> I'm braver than all the other pathetic people stood watching. But.... the >>> guy drowning should have learnt to swim properly, so why should I >>> save him? >> >> Tisk ... all about YOU ....... >> >> Seems you were never schooled in the Golden Rule, the >> foundation of ethics - empathy 101. > >Buck Buck Bacaw revealed long ago that he is a supporter of the British >National Party, a cesspit designed to attract sociopaths. Not that I >blame Britain for that; every country seems to have something equivalent. Hmm ... do sociopaths enjoy each others company ? :-)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-02 20:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <op.yamo43aq86ebyl@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #578472 |
On Sat, 02 Jan 2016 02:47:05 -0000, Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> wrote: > On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 17:47:13 +1100, Peter Moylan > <peter@pmoylan.org.invalid> wrote: > >> On 2016-Jan-01 14:00, Mr. B1ack wrote: >>> On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 17:12:47 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote: >> >>>> I'm never sure if I'd rescue someone from drowning. If I do, it shows >>>> I'm braver than all the other pathetic people stood watching. But.... the >>>> guy drowning should have learnt to swim properly, so why should I >>>> save him? >>> >>> Tisk ... all about YOU ....... >>> >>> Seems you were never schooled in the Golden Rule, the >>> foundation of ethics - empathy 101. >> >> Buck Buck Bacaw revealed long ago that he is a supporter of the British >> National Party, a cesspit designed to attract sociopaths. Not that I >> blame Britain for that; every country seems to have something equivalent. > > Hmm ... do sociopaths enjoy each others company ? :-) Only if they're white. -- Fellows, it's often easier to just give in to your wife. I mean, what's your word against thousands of hers?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-01 14:57 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <op.yakeh9w086ebyl@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #578255 |
On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 03:00:40 -0000, Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> wrote: > On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 17:12:47 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 08:22:33 -0000, James Hogg <Jas.Hogg@goutmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Mr. B1ack wrote: >>>> On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 19:23:21 -0000, "Mr Macaw" <no@spam.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 18:58:53 -0000, Dr. Jai Maharaj <alt.fan.jai-maharaj@googlegroups.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> In article <op.yagzluoy86ebyl@red.lan>, >>>>>> "Mr Macaw" <n...@spam.com> posted: >>>>>>> 15 million people have spelt length as lenght on the >>>>>>> internet, and they actually think it's correct, not just >>>>>>> a typo! >>>>>> "spelt" >>>>>> about 12,700,000 search results. >>>>>> >>>>>> "spelled" >>>>>> about 50,500,000 search results. >>>>> Those are both words, with a subtle difference not many people care about. In my example, lenght is not a word. >>>> >>>> >>>> "Spelt" is English english. "Spelled" is more the American version. >>>> >>>> "Pleaded" and "runned" are American 'Blinglish' ... the slow death >>>> of the irregular verb. >>> >>> Some American dove in and rescued it. >> >> I'm never sure if I'd rescue someone from drowning. If I do, it shows >> I'm braver than all the other pathetic people stood watching. But.... the >> guy drowning should have learnt to swim properly, so why should I >> save him? > > Tisk ... all about YOU ....... > > Seems you were never schooled in the Golden Rule, the > foundation of ethics - empathy 101. Do you have empathy for an idiot? If you see someone deliberately doing something stupid and about to kill himself, would you stop him? Why? Why does the world need him alive? -- "A computer lets you make more mistakes faster than any invention in human history--with the possible exceptions of handguns and tequila."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.usage.english
csiph-web