Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.talk.royalty > #29377 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Louis Epstein <le@main.lekno.ws> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2023-12-19 00:45 +0000 |
| Last post | 2023-12-23 15:55 +0000 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.talk.royalty
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: OT: Fascinating article on Queen Anne (reigned 1702-1714) Louis Epstein <le@main.lekno.ws> - 2023-12-19 00:45 +0000
Re: OT: Fascinating article on Queen Anne (reigned 1702-1714) "Keith F. Lynch" <kfl@KeithLynch.net> - 2023-12-23 15:55 +0000
| From | Louis Epstein <le@main.lekno.ws> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-12-19 00:45 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Fascinating article on Queen Anne (reigned 1702-1714) |
| Message-ID | <ulqp36$pcf$2@reader2.panix.com> |
Tommie Hicks <tommie.hicks303@gmail.com> wrote: > There is a penchant for some gay historians to portray long dead straight people as gay. People in same-sex sexual relationships love to portray past persons' close same-sex relationships as sexual,and people not hewing to the cultural stereotypes of their biological sex love to portray past such iconoclasts as properly defined outside the "gender" of that biological sex. > Anne's brother-in-law William 3 is an example. There are two letters that exist today in Sarah Churchill's own hand where she describes > Anne's abhorrence for gay lifestyles. Anne was a hot mess for losing all of her children and being queen when she wasn't supposed to be. > Yet the positives of her reign far outweigh the negatives. I have read that she was utterly besotted with her unfaithful husband, which a lesbian would not be. -=-=- The World Trade Center towers MUST rise again, at least as tall as before...or terror has triumphed.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Keith F. Lynch" <kfl@KeithLynch.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-12-23 15:55 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <um6vub$lfm$1@reader1.panix.com> |
| In reply to | #29377 |
Louis Epstein <le@main.lekno.ws> wrote: > Tommie Hicks <tommie.hicks303@gmail.com> wrote: >> Anne was a hot mess for losing all of her children and being queen >> when she wasn't supposed to be. Yet the positives of her reign far >> outweigh the negatives. The Stuarts look good only in comparison with their predecesors, the "off-with-their-heads" Tudors, and their successors, the Hanovers, whom the American Revolution was fought against. And of course their interruptors, the Roundheads, who abolished music, sports, theater, decorations, and Christmas. > I have read that she was utterly besotted with her unfaithful > husband, which a lesbian would not be. It's interesting when gossip intersects with geography. I live in Virginia (was Bess really a virgin?), and just over the nearby state border is Prince George's County, named for Anne's unfaithful husband. I'd bet that 95% of PG County residents have no idea who their county is named for. -- Keith F. Lynch - http://keithlynch.net/ Please see http://keithlynch.net/email.html before emailing me.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | alt.talk.royalty
csiph-web