Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.talk.royalty > #29400

Re: Shocking discovery

From Louis Epstein <le@main.lekno.ws>
Newsgroups alt.talk.royalty
Subject Re: Shocking discovery
Date 2024-04-11 15:44 +0000
Organization PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Message-ID <uv90hd$690$1@reader1.panix.com> (permalink)
References <uuf5qq$gle$1@reader1.panix.com> <uv80th$7k2$2@reader1.panix.com> <uv8oeu$dl2$1@reader1.panix.com>

Show all headers | View raw


Keith F. Lynch <kfl@keithlynch.net> wrote:
> Louis Epstein <le@main.lekno.ws> wrote:
>> Keith F. Lynch <kfl@keithlynch.net> wrote:
>>> This has resulting in a shocking discovery.  It turns out that William
>>> the Conqueror was illegitimate, i.e. his parents were not married to
>>> each other!
> 
>> Umm...William was known as "William the Bastard" before he did his
>> conquering...the marital status of his parents was well known.
> 
> Yes, that was the whole point of my joke.  You did notice the date I
> posted it on, right?
> 
> Another part of the joke is that it's extremely unlikely that there's
> anyone now living who is descended from Alfred who is not also
> descended from William.
> 
>> Conquest has a way of restarting laws from scratch.
> 
> William did have a fairly good claim to the throne.  He wasn't just
> some random person who decided to take over.  Edward the Confessor was
> such a generous person that he was made a saint.  Unfortunately, he
> was so generous that he promised the throne to several people -- who
> then fought over it.
> 
>> When Alfred died his son Edward the Elder took over despite the
>> claims of Ethelwald of York,son of Alfred's elder brother Ethelred I.
> 
>> How long will this injustice persist?
> 
>> And how can a Parliament convened by a false monarch have a say?
> 
> I don't think Edward the Elder ever convened a parliament.

I was pointing out the logical inconsistency of Charles III's parliament
setting the rules for his replacement,if in fact he was a usurper.
(Shades of the precedence of the Lords Le Despencer).

> Speaking of Edwards, I recently noticed that Ed 3 ruled for more years
> than Eds 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 combined.

Edwards of course were the ones who continued to be named
after the Conquest but had the previous ones ignored for
numbering purposes (though Edward the Martyr got to be a
patron saint for being murdered for his stepmother's convenience,
an easier but more painful path than the Confessor took).

On a personal level...this address le@lekno.ws
replaced the le@put.com address I had had since
1995 when I sold the put.com domain in 2023.

Have you ever done anything about getting a pardon in Virginia?
You say you hope to get the bogus convictions reversed,but the
officialdom wants some sort of application,which I guess you
decline to file because it implies guilt?

-=-=-
The World Trade Center towers MUST rise again,
at least as tall as before...or terror has triumphed.

Back to alt.talk.royalty | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Shocking discovery "Keith F. Lynch" <kfl@KeithLynch.net> - 2024-04-01 20:35 +0000
  Re: Shocking discovery Louis Epstein <le@main.lekno.ws> - 2024-04-11 06:45 +0000
    Re: Shocking discovery "Keith F. Lynch" <kfl@KeithLynch.net> - 2024-04-11 13:26 +0000
      Re: Shocking discovery Louis Epstein <le@main.lekno.ws> - 2024-04-11 15:44 +0000
        Re: Shocking discovery "Keith F. Lynch" <kfl@KeithLynch.net> - 2024-04-11 23:58 +0000
          Re: Shocking discovery Louis Epstein <le@main.lekno.ws> - 2024-04-17 21:54 +0000

csiph-web