Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.sys.pdp10 > #9945 > unrolled thread
| Started by | jayjwa <jayjwa@atr2.ath.cx.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2026-07-23 17:39 -0400 |
| Last post | 2026-08-21 13:27 +0100 |
| Articles | 4 on this page of 24 — 10 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.sys.pdp10
Fizz Buzz jayjwa <jayjwa@atr2.ath.cx.invalid> - 2026-07-23 17:39 -0400
Re: Fizz Buzz Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> - 2026-07-23 23:19 -0400
Re: Fizz Buzz jayjwa <jayjwa@atr2.ath.cx.invalid> - 2026-07-25 12:00 -0400
Re: Fizz Buzz Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> - 2026-07-25 18:05 -0400
Re: Fizz Buzz jayjwa <jayjwa@atr2.ath.cx.invalid> - 2026-07-26 11:12 -0400
Accumulator naming Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> - 2026-07-29 18:10 -0400
Re: Accumulator naming scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-07-30 15:14 +0000
Re: old architectures, was Accumulator naming John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2026-07-30 20:40 +0000
Re: Accumulator naming Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> - 2026-07-30 18:41 -0400
Re: Accumulator naming jayjwa <jayjwa@atr2.ath.cx.invalid> - 2026-07-30 11:24 -0400
Re: Accumulator naming scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-07-30 16:03 +0000
Re: Accumulator naming Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> - 2026-07-30 18:56 -0400
Re: Accumulator naming cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-07-30 23:48 +0000
Re: Accumulator naming John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2026-07-31 01:31 +0000
Re: Accumulator naming cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2026-07-31 02:52 +0000
Re: Accumulator naming John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2026-07-31 03:36 +0000
Re: Accumulator naming Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> - 2026-07-31 13:40 +0000
Re: Accumulator naming Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> - 2026-07-31 13:35 +0000
the Ten Heavenly Stems (was Re: Accumulator naming) Kragen Javier Sitaker <kragen@canonical.org> - 2026-09-11 16:07 -0300
Re: the Ten Heavenly Stems (was Re: Accumulator naming) Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> - 2026-09-14 01:12 +0800
Re: the Ten Heavenly Stems (was Re: Accumulator naming) Kragen Javier Sitaker <kragen@canonical.org> - 2026-09-14 14:40 -0300
Re: the Ten Heavenly Stems (was Re: Accumulator naming) scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2026-09-14 18:09 +0000
Re: the Ten Heavenly Stems (was Re: Accumulator naming) quadibloc@invalid.com (John Savard) - 2026-10-26 03:00 +0000
Re: Fizz Buzz "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2026-08-21 13:27 +0100
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | Kragen Javier Sitaker <kragen@canonical.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-14 14:40 -0300 |
| Subject | Re: the Ten Heavenly Stems (was Re: Accumulator naming) |
| Message-ID | <87tsnrpw7z.fsf@debian> |
| In reply to | #9998 |
Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@myrkraverk.invalid> writes: > On 12/09/2026 3:07 AM, Kragen Javier Sitaker wrote: >> jayjwa <jayjwa@atr2.ath.cx.invalid> writes: >>> It's easier, at least for me, to make a “mental map” of where things are >>> when they have names rather than numbers, even if those names are >>> short. It's easier to recall “watermellon”, “apple”, “grape” than 39, >>> 23, 5 even though both sets are decending in magnitude. [...] >> In English, Hebrew, Greek, etc., the obvious alternative to numbers >> is to use letters of the alphabet: register A, register B, register >> C, etc. In Chinese, of course, there is no alphabet, but, as I >> understand it (my Chinese is mostly limited to reading datasheets), >> the Ten Heavenly Stems <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heavenly_Stems> >> and Twelve Earthly Branches >> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earthly_Branches> are used in much the >> same way. [...] > > You can add to this list a few hieroglyphs. There are a little over se- > ven hundred in the standard /middle egyptian/ and you can see most of > them at the back of Gardiner's book. Well, probably all of them in the > most recent edition. [...] Is there a sequence of hieroglyphs that is conventionally used as ordinals in the way that the Heavenly Stems and Earthly Branches are? Kragen
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-14 18:09 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: the Ten Heavenly Stems (was Re: Accumulator naming) |
| Message-ID | <gLWpS.245226$ORN1.231571@fx24.iad> |
| In reply to | #10000 |
please remove comp.arch from this thread
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | quadibloc@invalid.com (John Savard) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-26 03:00 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: the Ten Heavenly Stems (was Re: Accumulator naming) |
| Message-ID | <6adec1c4.11894625@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #10000 |
>> On 12/09/2026 3:07 AM, Kragen Javier Sitaker wrote: >>> In English, Hebrew, Greek, etc., the obvious alternative to numbers >>> is to use letters of the alphabet: register A, register B, register >>> C, etc. In Chinese, of course, there is no alphabet, but, as I >>> understand it (my Chinese is mostly limited to reading datasheets), >>> the Ten Heavenly Stems <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heavenly_Stems> >>> and Twelve Earthly Branches >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earthly_Branches> are used in much the >>> same way. [...] Also, for numbering things 1 to 1000, Chinese sometimes uses the text of the Thousand Character Classic. One example of this is the use of the first *eighty* characters from the Thousand Character Classic for a game essentially equivalent to Keno. John Savard
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-21 13:27 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <20260821132747.0961f123c319efd57499ba3d@127.0.0.1> |
| In reply to | #9945 |
On Thu, 23 Jul 2026 17:39:22 -0400 jayjwa <jayjwa@atr2.ath.cx.invalid> wrote: > As I continue on with MACRO-20, I thought I'd share my Fizz Buzz > solution for TOPS-10 and TOPS-20. I wanted the solution where you stuff [] > If other alt.lang.asm'ers want to do Fizz Buzz, don't forget to remove > the pdp10 newsgroup from your reply if it's not about the pdp10. BTDT. -> d 100 l3D 1F6D:0100 89 D7 BE 28-01 B1 04 75-05 88 64 FE-F2 A4 01 CE ...(...u..d..... 1F6D:0110 FE 04 AD 7E-F0 D4 0A 86-E0 0D 30 30-39 FA 75 01 ...~......009.u. 1F6D:0120 AB A5 A4 3C-3A B4 09 CD-21 7C D5 C3-FD FD 46 69 ...<:...!|....Fi 1F6D:0130 7A-7A FB FB 42-75 7A 7A 00-09 0D 0A 24 zz..Buzz....$ -> Bah, and indeed, Humbug
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | alt.sys.pdp10
csiph-web