Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.slack > #369176 > unrolled thread

I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers

Started byBrennus <brennus@allia.org>
First post2018-05-03 23:11 +0000
Last post2018-05-08 14:45 -0700
Articles 20 on this page of 166 — 17 participants

Back to article view | Back to alt.slack


Contents

  I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Brennus <brennus@allia.org> - 2018-05-03 23:11 +0000
    Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-05-03 16:38 -0700
      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-03 20:10 -0500
        Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-05-03 18:13 -0700
          Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-03 20:19 -0500
            Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-05-03 18:22 -0700
              Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-03 20:44 -0500
              Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-11 22:18 -0700
                Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-12 09:26 -0400
          Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-04 01:48 +0000
            Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-03 21:55 -0400
              Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-04 01:57 +0000
                Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-03 22:03 -0400
                  Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-03 21:24 -0500
                    Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-05-03 20:25 -0700
                      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Brennus <brennus@allia.org> - 2018-05-04 04:40 +0000
                  Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-04 04:13 +0000
                    Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 01:16 -0700
                      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-04 23:06 +0000
                        Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-05 02:56 -0400
                          Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-05 06:58 +0000
                            Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-05 12:29 -0400
                        Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-05 15:14 -0700
                          Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-06 06:13 -0400
                            Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers donstockbauer@hotmail.com - 2018-05-06 05:12 -0700
                              Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Brennus <brennus@allia.org> - 2018-05-06 13:57 +0000
                            Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-06 09:10 -0400
                            Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-06 09:23 -0500
                              Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-06 11:30 -0400
                                Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-06 12:31 -0500
                                  Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-06 23:13 +0000
                                    Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 11:02 -0500
                                      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Brennus <brennus@allia.org> - 2018-05-07 17:04 +0000
                                        Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 12:36 -0500
                                      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-07 19:25 +0000
                                        Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 14:52 -0500
                                          Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-07 20:19 +0000
                                            Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 13:28 -0700
                                            Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 17:21 -0500
                                              Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 16:17 -0700
                                              Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-07 21:04 -0400
                                                Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 20:31 -0500
                                                  Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 08:21 -0400
                                                    Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 20:22 -0500
                                                      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 18:25 -0700
                                              Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 01:33 +0000
                                                Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 22:55 -0700
                                                  Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 06:06 -0400
                                                    Magnetic South wanders around and varies. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-08 07:41 -0700
                                                      Re: Magnetic South wanders around and varies. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 12:36 -0400
                                                        Charged particles from the sun destroy the ozone layer. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-08 10:15 -0700
                                                          Re: Charged particles from the sun destroy the ozone layer. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 07:02 -0400
                                                            Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-09 08:55 -0700
                                                              Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-09 19:25 +0000
                                                                Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 15:06 -0500
                                                                  Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-09 22:18 +0000
                                                                    Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 15:24 -0700
                                                                      Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-09 18:25 -0500
                                                                        Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 16:51 -0700
                                                                          Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-09 19:09 -0500
                                                                            Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 17:17 -0700
                                                                              Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-09 21:09 -0500
                                                                                Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 19:17 -0700
                                                                                  Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-05-10 08:13 +0100
                                                                            Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. donstockbauer@hotmail.com - 2018-05-10 08:23 -0700
                                                                              Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. donstockbauer@hotmail.com - 2018-05-10 08:33 -0700
                                                                    Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Skeeter DoW 420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-09 16:33 -0600
                                                                    Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 21:21 -0500
                                                                      Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-10 09:06 -0400
                                                                        Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Skeeter DoW 420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-10 07:08 -0600
                                                                        Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 09:18 -0500
                                                                          Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-10 10:54 -0400
                                                                            Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Skeeter DoW 420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-10 08:58 -0600
                                                                              Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-10 11:00 -0400
                                                                                Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 10:22 -0500
                                                                                  Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-10 20:34 +0000
                                                                                    Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Skeeter DoW 420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-10 16:18 -0600
                                                                                      Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-10 22:47 +0000
                                                                                Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Skeeter DoW 420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-10 09:25 -0600
                                                                            Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 10:21 -0500
                                                                              Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-10 20:36 +0000
                                                            Re: Charged particles from the sun destroy the ozone layer. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 15:01 -0500
                                                    Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 09:53 -0500
                                                      Cars used to kill the young, more than anything else. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-08 08:19 -0700
                                                Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 08:24 -0400
                                                  Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 12:39 -0400
                                                    Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 15:08 -0400
                                                      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 19:56 +0000
                                                        Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 17:21 -0400
                                                          Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 14:23 -0700
                                                        Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 14:29 -0700
                                                          Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 23:18 +0000
                                                            Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 19:05 -0500
                                                              Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 17:10 -0700
                                                                Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-08 19:22 -0500
                                                                  Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 17:35 -0700
                                                              Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 07:04 -0400
                                                                Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 15:03 -0500
                                                            Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 22:22 -0400
                                                              Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 07:06 -0400
                                                            Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 22:38 -0700
                                                              Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 07:07 -0400
                                                Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 20:26 -0500
                                                  Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 18:27 -0700
                                                  Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 22:05 -0400
                                                  Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers donstockbauer@hotmail.com - 2018-05-09 10:40 -0700
                                        Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-07 20:42 -0400
                                Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-07 10:36 -0400
                                  Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-07 11:48 -0400
                                    Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 11:03 -0500
                                      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-07 19:28 +0000
                                        Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-07 20:50 -0400
                                          Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 01:35 +0000
                                            Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 21:18 -0500
                                              Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 03:30 +0000
                                                Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 23:00 -0500
                                                  Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 06:08 -0400
                                                    Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 09:56 -0500
                                            Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 08:26 -0400
                                              Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 12:40 -0400
                                                Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 15:36 -0400
                                                  Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 19:58 +0000
                                                    Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Skeeter <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-08 14:02 -0600
                                                      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 13:10 -0700
                                                      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 20:12 +0000
                                                        Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 17:34 -0400
                                                      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 14:23 -0700
                                                        Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 14:25 -0700
                                                    Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 17:24 -0400
                                                      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 23:19 +0000
                                                        Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 22:20 -0400
                                                          Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 07:09 -0400
                                                    Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 20:34 -0500
                                    Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-07 15:15 -0400
                                      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-07 19:40 +0000
                                        Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 14:56 -0500
                                        Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 13:49 -0700
                                          Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 01:37 +0000
                                  Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-07 19:27 +0000
                                    Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 15:02 -0500
                                    Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-07 20:45 -0400
                                      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 01:37 +0000
                                        Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 22:32 -0700
                                          Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 10:01 -0500
                                            Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 15:06 -0400
                Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-03 20:55 -0700
            Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-03 21:23 -0500
              Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-05-03 20:26 -0700
              Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-04 04:14 +0000
                Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-04 09:35 -0500
                  Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Brennus <brennus@allia.org> - 2018-05-04 16:56 +0000
            Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-03 21:06 -0700
        Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Brennus <brennus@allia.org> - 2018-05-04 04:34 +0000
      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Brennus <brennus@allia.org> - 2018-05-04 04:32 +0000
    Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers The Original Fred Oinka not pudfake <stardusthevn@gmail.com> - 2018-05-03 17:58 -0700
      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Brennus <brennus@allia.org> - 2018-05-04 04:39 +0000
        Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers The Original Fred Oinka not pudfake <stardusthevn@gmail.com> - 2018-05-03 21:56 -0700
          Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Brennus <brennus@allia.org> - 2018-05-04 16:54 +0000
            Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers The Original Fred Oinka not pudfake <stardusthevn@gmail.com> - 2018-05-05 16:28 -0700
      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers donstockbauer@hotmail.com - 2018-05-09 10:42 -0700
    Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers "Colonel Edmund J. Burke" <burkesbabes@bigass-babes.com> - 2018-05-06 08:57 -0700
      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Brennus <brennus@allia.org> - 2018-05-06 18:09 +0000
        Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers "Colonel Edmund J. Burke" <burkesbabes@bigass-babes.com> - 2018-05-07 09:35 -0700
          Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Brennus <brennus@allia.org> - 2018-05-07 17:00 +0000
            I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers, like Brennass' mom has "Colonel Edmund J. Burke" <burkesbabes@bigass-babes.com> - 2018-05-08 08:38 -0700
          Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers The Original Fred Oinka not pudfake <stardusthevn@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 14:45 -0700

Page 7 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9  Next page →


#369443

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2018-05-08 15:36 -0400
Message-ID<e%mIC.53839$bJ2.18793@fx15.iad>
In reply to#369430
On 5/8/2018 12:40 PM, kensi wrote:
> On 5/8/2018 8:26 AM, benj wrote:
>> On 5/7/2018 9:35 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>> On Mon, 07 May 2018 20:50:04 -0400, benj wrote:
>>>> Put down the doobie, stoner. While you off really looking at your own
>>>> hand I published massive proof for you and "kanzi" to enjoy.
>>>
>>> Then you won't have any trouble posting the MID of this post with this
>>> alleged "proof".
>>>
>>> MID goes here: ______________________
>>>
>>> <starts periodically glancing impatiently at watch>
>>
>> If you aren't reading my posts I"m certainly not going to spoon feed 
>> you. I do not take orders from you.
> 
> Translation: no MID. Just as expected.
> 
"Kansi" you ignorant sock. So you are just a stoned as Nads? Neither of 
you read anything anyone post, you only think of what schoolyard taunt 
you are going to post next.

If you had three brain cells to rub together you'd know that *I* didn't 
post proof, I ordered NADS to do it for me as my slave girl! And she did!

We doan need no stinkin' MID!
Here's the ACTUAL POST, Cut and pasted just like you do!
---------------------
Nads, the disgusting low whore who does all my bidding provides any 
proof needed for me for all my gems of wisdom.

Oh wait you want proof of the failed cartoonist. OK

Hey, Nads, you low worm, post the reference for me:

<groveling ensues>

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/07/23/yes-why-does-john-cook-of-skepticalscience-and-the-97-have-to-use-identity-theft-in-his-research/

https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-lIlV30WM-RM/Vw88f2LrePI/AAAAAAAATvM/MIB6ssz6vEoVgL9kuUs-3PeJBzBNdAz_ACLcB/s1600/Screenshot%2B2015-06-28%2B16.13.33.png

<raspberry> (Rule #5)
-----------
Climate crooks dressed as Nazis. There's your proof. Bet Nads cuts quite 
the figure in her SS uniform too!










[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#369445

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-05-08 19:58 +0000
Message-ID<pcsvhr$ci8$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#369443
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Tue, 08 May 2018 15:36:41 -0400, benj wrote:

> On 5/8/2018 12:40 PM, kensi wrote:
>> On 5/8/2018 8:26 AM, benj wrote:
>>> On 5/7/2018 9:35 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 07 May 2018 20:50:04 -0400, benj wrote:
>>>>> Put down the doobie, stoner. While you off really looking at your
>>>>> own hand I published massive proof for you and "kanzi" to enjoy.
>>>>
>>>> Then you won't have any trouble posting the MID of this post with
>>>> this alleged "proof".
>>>>
>>>> MID goes here: ______________________
>>>>
>>>> <starts periodically glancing impatiently at watch>
>>>
>>> If you aren't reading my posts I"m certainly not going to spoon feed
>>> you. I do not take orders from you.
>> 
>> Translation: no MID. Just as expected.
>> 
> "Kansi" you ignorant sock. So you are just a stoned as Nads? Neither of
> you read anything anyone post, you only think of what schoolyard taunt
> you are going to post next.
> 
> If you had three brain cells to rub together you'd know that *I* didn't
> post proof, I ordered NADS to do it for me as my slave girl! And she
> did!
> 
> We doan need no stinkin' MID!
> Here's the ACTUAL POST, Cut and pasted just like you do!
> ---------------------
> Nads, the disgusting low whore who does all my bidding provides any
> proof needed for me for all my gems of wisdom.
> 
> Oh wait you want proof of the failed cartoonist. OK
> 
> Hey, Nads, you low worm, post the reference for me:
> 
> <groveling ensues>
> 
> https://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/07/23/yes-why-does-john-cook-of-
skepticalscience-and-the-97-have-to-use-identity-theft-in-his-research/
> 
> https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-lIlV30WM-RM/Vw88f2LrePI/AAAAAAAATvM/
MIB6ssz6vEoVgL9kuUs-3PeJBzBNdAz_ACLcB/s1600/Screenshot%2B2015-06-28%
2B16.13.33.png
> 
> <raspberry> (Rule #5)
> -----------
> Climate crooks dressed as Nazis. There's your proof. Bet Nads cuts quite
> the figure in her SS uniform too!

Nice smokescreen. But still no proof of your allegation that I rent myself 
out for sex. Still no proof that I "do all your bidding". Still no proof 
that you have any "gems of wisdom", for that matter -- so far everything 
you've tried to pass off as such has proved on close inspection to be 
cubic zirconia.

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#369446

FromSkeeter <fnvw@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-05-08 14:02 -0600
Message-ID<bh04fddarmvincdf11163epkt01v2lpfmb@4ax.com>
In reply to#369445
On Tue, 8 May 2018 19:58:51 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
<nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:

>Nice smokescreen. But still no proof of your allegation that I rent myself 
>out for sex. Still no proof that I "do all your bidding". Still no proof 
>that you have any "gems of wisdom", for that matter -- so far everything 
>you've tried to pass off as such has proved on close inspection to be 
>cubic zirconia.


Better then the dust you been tossing out.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#369447

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2018-05-08 13:10 -0700
Message-ID<b8plot.c6m.17.3@news.alt.net>
In reply to#369446
On 2018-05-08 1:02 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> On Tue, 8 May 2018 19:58:51 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> 
>> Nice smokescreen. But still no proof of your allegation that I rent myself
>> out for sex. Still no proof that I "do all your bidding". Still no proof
>> that you have any "gems of wisdom", for that matter -- so far everything
>> you've tried to pass off as such has proved on close inspection to be
>> cubic zirconia.
> 
> 
> Better then the dust you been tossing out.
> 
i just got an email that said ,
hi , still single ,
i freakin missed it again ,
there i was single and i didn't know ,
i could'a went out and tore it up if i knew ,
which is what i'd be doing if i was a single guy

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#369448

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-05-08 20:12 +0000
Message-ID<pct0bj$ci8$7@dont-email.me>
In reply to#369446
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Tue, 08 May 2018 14:02:08 -0600, Skeeter wrote:

> On Tue, 8 May 2018 19:58:51 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> 
>>Nice smokescreen. But still no proof of your allegation that I rent
>>myself out for sex. Still no proof that I "do all your bidding". Still
>>no proof that you have any "gems of wisdom", for that matter -- so far
>>everything you've tried to pass off as such has proved on close
>>inspection to be cubic zirconia.
>
> Bzzzzz!

SLAP
SLAP
<rolls up newspaper>
SWAT
SMACK!
<grabs can>
spritz
spritz
spritz

<snicker>

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#369461

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2018-05-08 17:34 -0400
Message-ID<QJoIC.138367$DS3.106846@fx42.iad>
In reply to#369448
On 5/8/2018 4:12 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Tue, 08 May 2018 14:02:08 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, 8 May 2018 19:58:51 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> Nice smokescreen. But still no proof of your allegation that I rent
>>> myself out for sex. Still no proof that I "do all your bidding". Still
>>> no proof that you have any "gems of wisdom", for that matter -- so far
>>> everything you've tried to pass off as such has proved on close
>>> inspection to be cubic zirconia.
>>
>> Bzzzzz!
> 
> SLAP
> SLAP
> <rolls up newspaper>
> SWAT
> SMACK!
> <grabs can>
> spritz
> spritz
> spritz
> 
> <snicker>
> 
What an amazing fantasy life. I keep telling you Nads to lay off the 
stash for a while.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#369452

FromCheckmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
Date2018-05-08 14:23 -0700
Message-ID<MPG.355bb52352f7a22e993945@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#369446
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <bh04fddarmvincdf11163epkt01v2lpfmb@4ax.com>, 
fnvw@invalid.invalid says...


> 
> On Tue, 8 May 2018 19:58:51 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> 
> >Nice smokescreen. But still no proof of your allegation that I rent myself 
> >out for sex. Still no proof that I "do all your bidding". Still no proof 
> >that you have any "gems of wisdom", for that matter -- so far everything 
> >you've tried to pass off as such has proved on close inspection to be 
> >cubic zirconia.
> 
> 
> Better then the dust you been tossing out.

A BIG FAT SPANKY-SPANKY! (tm) on Nads!

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#369457

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2018-05-08 14:25 -0700
Message-ID<b8pq4u.94o.19.4@news.alt.net>
In reply to#369452
On 2018-05-08 2:23 PM, Checkmate wrote:
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!  In article <bh04fddarmvincdf11163epkt01v2lpfmb@4ax.com>,
> fnvw@invalid.invalid says...
> 
> 
>>
>> On Tue, 8 May 2018 19:58:51 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> Nice smokescreen. But still no proof of your allegation that I rent myself
>>> out for sex. Still no proof that I "do all your bidding". Still no proof
>>> that you have any "gems of wisdom", for that matter -- so far everything
>>> you've tried to pass off as such has proved on close inspection to be
>>> cubic zirconia.
>>
>>
>> Better then the dust you been tossing out.
> 
> A BIG FAT SPANKY-SPANKY! (tm) on Nads!
> 
a little skinny yanky yanky

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#369455

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2018-05-08 17:24 -0400
Message-ID<gAoIC.88568$R51.29408@fx03.iad>
In reply to#369445
On 5/8/2018 3:58 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Tue, 08 May 2018 15:36:41 -0400, benj wrote:
> 
>> On 5/8/2018 12:40 PM, kensi wrote:
>>> On 5/8/2018 8:26 AM, benj wrote:
>>>> On 5/7/2018 9:35 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 07 May 2018 20:50:04 -0400, benj wrote:
>>>>>> Put down the doobie, stoner. While you off really looking at your
>>>>>> own hand I published massive proof for you and "kanzi" to enjoy.
>>>>>
>>>>> Then you won't have any trouble posting the MID of this post with
>>>>> this alleged "proof".
>>>>>
>>>>> MID goes here: ______________________
>>>>>
>>>>> <starts periodically glancing impatiently at watch>
>>>>
>>>> If you aren't reading my posts I"m certainly not going to spoon feed
>>>> you. I do not take orders from you.
>>>
>>> Translation: no MID. Just as expected.
>>>
>> "Kansi" you ignorant sock. So you are just a stoned as Nads? Neither of
>> you read anything anyone post, you only think of what schoolyard taunt
>> you are going to post next.
>>
>> If you had three brain cells to rub together you'd know that *I* didn't
>> post proof, I ordered NADS to do it for me as my slave girl! And she
>> did!
>>
>> We doan need no stinkin' MID!
>> Here's the ACTUAL POST, Cut and pasted just like you do!
>> ---------------------
>> Nads, the disgusting low whore who does all my bidding provides any
>> proof needed for me for all my gems of wisdom.
>>
>> Oh wait you want proof of the failed cartoonist. OK
>>
>> Hey, Nads, you low worm, post the reference for me:
>>
>> <groveling ensues>
>>
>> https://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/07/23/yes-why-does-john-cook-of-
> skepticalscience-and-the-97-have-to-use-identity-theft-in-his-research/
>>
>> https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-lIlV30WM-RM/Vw88f2LrePI/AAAAAAAATvM/
> MIB6ssz6vEoVgL9kuUs-3PeJBzBNdAz_ACLcB/s1600/Screenshot%2B2015-06-28%
> 2B16.13.33.png
>>
>> <raspberry> (Rule #5)
>> -----------
>> Climate crooks dressed as Nazis. There's your proof. Bet Nads cuts quite
>> the figure in her SS uniform too!
> 
> Nice smokescreen. But still no proof of your allegation that I rent myself
> out for sex. Still no proof that I "do all your bidding". Still no proof
> that you have any "gems of wisdom", for that matter -- so far everything
> you've tried to pass off as such has proved on close inspection to be
> cubic zirconia.

Every post I make if ample proof of all those things. Every post you 
make is proof of your dishonesty and ignorance. Nothing more is needed 
for any intelligent observer. (You are obviously hoping none of your 
readers are intelligent. Not that that is a bad assumption, I'd guess.)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#369466

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-05-08 23:19 +0000
Message-ID<pctb9v$ci8$11@dont-email.me>
In reply to#369455
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Tue, 08 May 2018 17:24:27 -0400, benj wrote:

> On 5/8/2018 3:58 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>> melt! On Tue, 08 May 2018 15:36:41 -0400, benj wrote:
>> 
>>> On 5/8/2018 12:40 PM, kensi wrote:
>>>> On 5/8/2018 8:26 AM, benj wrote:
>>>>> On 5/7/2018 9:35 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 07 May 2018 20:50:04 -0400, benj wrote:
>>>>>>> Put down the doobie, stoner. While you off really looking at your
>>>>>>> own hand I published massive proof for you and "kanzi" to enjoy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then you won't have any trouble posting the MID of this post with
>>>>>> this alleged "proof".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> MID goes here: ______________________
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <starts periodically glancing impatiently at watch>
>>>>>
>>>>> If you aren't reading my posts I"m certainly not going to spoon feed
>>>>> you. I do not take orders from you.
>>>>
>>>> Translation: no MID. Just as expected.
>>>>
>>> "Kansi" you ignorant sock. So you are just a stoned as Nads? Neither
>>> of you read anything anyone post, you only think of what schoolyard
>>> taunt you are going to post next.
>>>
>>> If you had three brain cells to rub together you'd know that *I*
>>> didn't post proof, I ordered NADS to do it for me as my slave girl!
>>> And she did!
>>>
>>> We doan need no stinkin' MID!
>>> Here's the ACTUAL POST, Cut and pasted just like you do!
>>> ---------------------
>>> Nads, the disgusting low whore who does all my bidding provides any
>>> proof needed for me for all my gems of wisdom.
>>>
>>> Oh wait you want proof of the failed cartoonist. OK
>>>
>>> Hey, Nads, you low worm, post the reference for me:
>>>
>>> <groveling ensues>
>>>
>>> https://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/07/23/yes-why-does-john-cook-of-
>> skepticalscience-and-the-97-have-to-use-identity-theft-in-his-research/
>>>
>>> https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-lIlV30WM-RM/Vw88f2LrePI/AAAAAAAATvM/
>> MIB6ssz6vEoVgL9kuUs-3PeJBzBNdAz_ACLcB/s1600/Screenshot%2B2015-06-28%
>> 2B16.13.33.png
>>>
>>> <raspberry> (Rule #5)
>>> -----------
>>> Climate crooks dressed as Nazis. There's your proof. Bet Nads cuts
>>> quite the figure in her SS uniform too!
>> 
>> Nice smokescreen. But still no proof of your allegation that I rent
>> myself out for sex. Still no proof that I "do all your bidding". Still
>> no proof that you have any "gems of wisdom", for that matter -- so far
>> everything you've tried to pass off as such has proved on close
>> inspection to be cubic zirconia.
> 
> Every post I make if ample proof of all those things.

You and proof aren't even in the same Hubble volume, let alone zipcode.

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#369479

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2018-05-08 22:20 -0400
Message-ID<pVsIC.151232$RM2.14421@fx05.iad>
In reply to#369466
On 5/8/2018 7:19 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Tue, 08 May 2018 17:24:27 -0400, benj wrote:
> 
>> On 5/8/2018 3:58 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>> melt! On Tue, 08 May 2018 15:36:41 -0400, benj wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 5/8/2018 12:40 PM, kensi wrote:
>>>>> On 5/8/2018 8:26 AM, benj wrote:
>>>>>> On 5/7/2018 9:35 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mon, 07 May 2018 20:50:04 -0400, benj wrote:
>>>>>>>> Put down the doobie, stoner. While you off really looking at your
>>>>>>>> own hand I published massive proof for you and "kanzi" to enjoy.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Then you won't have any trouble posting the MID of this post with
>>>>>>> this alleged "proof".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> MID goes here: ______________________
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <starts periodically glancing impatiently at watch>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you aren't reading my posts I"m certainly not going to spoon feed
>>>>>> you. I do not take orders from you.
>>>>>
>>>>> Translation: no MID. Just as expected.
>>>>>
>>>> "Kansi" you ignorant sock. So you are just a stoned as Nads? Neither
>>>> of you read anything anyone post, you only think of what schoolyard
>>>> taunt you are going to post next.
>>>>
>>>> If you had three brain cells to rub together you'd know that *I*
>>>> didn't post proof, I ordered NADS to do it for me as my slave girl!
>>>> And she did!
>>>>
>>>> We doan need no stinkin' MID!
>>>> Here's the ACTUAL POST, Cut and pasted just like you do!
>>>> ---------------------
>>>> Nads, the disgusting low whore who does all my bidding provides any
>>>> proof needed for me for all my gems of wisdom.
>>>>
>>>> Oh wait you want proof of the failed cartoonist. OK
>>>>
>>>> Hey, Nads, you low worm, post the reference for me:
>>>>
>>>> <groveling ensues>
>>>>
>>>> https://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/07/23/yes-why-does-john-cook-of-
>>> skepticalscience-and-the-97-have-to-use-identity-theft-in-his-research/
>>>>
>>>> https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-lIlV30WM-RM/Vw88f2LrePI/AAAAAAAATvM/
>>> MIB6ssz6vEoVgL9kuUs-3PeJBzBNdAz_ACLcB/s1600/Screenshot%2B2015-06-28%
>>> 2B16.13.33.png
>>>>
>>>> <raspberry> (Rule #5)
>>>> -----------
>>>> Climate crooks dressed as Nazis. There's your proof. Bet Nads cuts
>>>> quite the figure in her SS uniform too!
>>>
>>> Nice smokescreen. But still no proof of your allegation that I rent
>>> myself out for sex. Still no proof that I "do all your bidding". Still
>>> no proof that you have any "gems of wisdom", for that matter -- so far
>>> everything you've tried to pass off as such has proved on close
>>> inspection to be cubic zirconia.
>>
>> Every post I make if ample proof of all those things.
> 
> You and proof aren't even in the same Hubble volume, let alone zipcode.
> 
"she" asserts without a shred of proof. I guess we have to go on your 
'honest" reputation, right? You and "honest" big Jim Comey! Hey, how do 
you deal with that situation? Comey is out to "get" Trump and give you 
all revenge for Hillary's loss but at the same time the misogynist is 
responsible for putting Martha Stewart in stir for saying she was 
innocent of a crime she was never charged with nor convicted of. What a 
woman hater! Oh wait. Martha isn't a woman, right? She isn't a lesbian, 
she is a rich capitalist and deserves all your hate. Got it. Sort of 
like Bill's sexual harassment and assaults don't count because he's one 
of yours.  Me Too doesn't apply to fellow comrades.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#369491

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-05-09 07:09 -0400
Message-ID<pcuku2$gbt$7@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#369479
On 5/8/2018 10:20 PM, benj wrote:
> On 5/8/2018 7:19 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>> On Tue, 08 May 2018 17:24:27 -0400, benj wrote:
>>> Every post I make if ample proof of all those things.
>>
>> You and proof aren't even in the same Hubble volume, let alone zipcode.
>
> "she" asserts without a shred of proof. I guess we have to go on your 
> 'honest" reputation, right? You and "honest" big Jim Comey! Hey, how do 
> you deal with that situation? Comey is out to "get" Trump and give you 
> all revenge for Hillary's loss but at the same time the misogynist is 
> responsible for putting Martha Stewart in stir for saying she was 
> innocent of a crime she was never charged with nor convicted of. What a 
> woman hater! Oh wait. Martha isn't a woman, right? She isn't a lesbian, 
> she is a rich capitalist and deserves all your hate. Got it. Sort of 
> like Bill's sexual harassment and assaults don't count because he's one 
> of yours.  Me Too doesn't apply to fellow comrades.

Scratch that, Nadegda. It seems that benj and *logic* aren't even in the 
same Hubble volume, to judge by that mass of semi-coherent screed.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#369477

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2018-05-08 20:34 -0500
Message-ID<pctj7f$vop$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#369445
On 5/8/2018 2:58 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Tue, 08 May 2018 15:36:41 -0400, benj wrote:
> 
>> On 5/8/2018 12:40 PM, kensi wrote:
>>> On 5/8/2018 8:26 AM, benj wrote:
>>>> On 5/7/2018 9:35 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 07 May 2018 20:50:04 -0400, benj wrote:
>>>>>> Put down the doobie, stoner. While you off really looking at your

>> <raspberry> (Rule #5)
>> -----------
>> Climate crooks dressed as Nazis. There's your proof. Bet Nads cuts quite
>> the figure in her SS uniform too!
> 
> Nice smokescreen. But still no proof of your allegation that I rent myself 
> out for sex. 

no, no nads, why did you do that, for cash ? never do that, unless you
want to write a tell all book about Trump and make the big bucks.


> Still no proof that I "do all your bidding". 

which means you admit to doing most of his bidding.


> Still no proof 
> that you have any "gems of wisdom", for that matter -- so far everything 
> you've tried to pass off as such has proved on close inspection to be 
> cubic zirconia.
> 

so, no CZ, got it,  but you do accept gems and/or cash as payment.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#369376

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2018-05-07 15:15 -0400
Message-ID<yB1IC.63296$wG5.60495@fx02.iad>
In reply to#369363
On 5/7/2018 11:48 AM, kensi wrote:
> On 5/7/2018 10:36 AM, benj wrote:
>> On 5/6/2018 11:30 AM, kensi wrote:
>>> On 5/6/2018 10:23 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>> Nazi's are  Democratic Socialist, like Nancy Pelosie + Chuck (pothead)
>>>> Schumer
>>>
>>> Nonsense ... and nonsense from someone Nadegda outed the other day as 
>>> guess what? Oh, yeah, a Nazi, that was what.
>>
>> Outed? Puhleeze! As much as NAds loves ordering other people around to 
>> do the things she believes they should be doing for their own good, 
>> her Nazi views are obvious even though she probably only wears the 
>> snappy uniform in private.
> 
> PPOSTFU!
> 
>> (Like the failed cartoonist who runs the "skeptical science" warmballer
>> fraudsite.)
> 
> See above.
> 
Nads, the disgusting low whore who does all my bidding provides any 
proof needed for me for all my gems of wisdom.

Oh wait you want proof of the failed cartoonist. OK

Hey, Nads, you low worm, post the reference for me:

<groveling ensues>

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/07/23/yes-why-does-john-cook-of-skepticalscience-and-the-97-have-to-use-identity-theft-in-his-research/

https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-lIlV30WM-RM/Vw88f2LrePI/AAAAAAAATvM/MIB6ssz6vEoVgL9kuUs-3PeJBzBNdAz_ACLcB/s1600/Screenshot%2B2015-06-28%2B16.13.33.png

<raspberry> (Rule #5)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#369380

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-05-07 19:40 +0000
Message-ID<pcqa3f$rk6$12@dont-email.me>
In reply to#369376
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Mon, 07 May 2018 15:15:41 -0400, benj wrote:

> On 5/7/2018 11:48 AM, kensi wrote:
>> On 5/7/2018 10:36 AM, benj wrote:
>>> On 5/6/2018 11:30 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>> On 5/6/2018 10:23 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>>> Nazi's are  Democratic Socialist, like Nancy Pelosie + Chuck
>>>>> (pothead)
>>>>> Schumer
>>>>
>>>> Nonsense ... and nonsense from someone Nadegda outed the other day as
>>>> guess what? Oh, yeah, a Nazi, that was what.
>>>
>>> Outed? Puhleeze! As much as NAds loves ordering other people around to
>>> do the things she believes they should be doing for their own good,
>>> her Nazi views are obvious even though she probably only wears the
>>> snappy uniform in private.
>> 
>> PPOSTFU!
>> 
>>> (Like the failed cartoonist who runs the "skeptical science"
>>> warmballer fraudsite.)
>> 
>> See above.
> 
> Nads, the disgusting low whore wh<MUSHROOM CLOUD!>

Fucking misogynists. They're everywhere!

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#369382

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2018-05-07 14:56 -0500
Message-ID<pcqb1v$1scp$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#369380
On 5/7/2018 2:40 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Mon, 07 May 2018 15:15:41 -0400, benj wrote:
> 
>> On 5/7/2018 11:48 AM, kensi wrote:
>>> On 5/7/2018 10:36 AM, benj wrote:
>>>> On 5/6/2018 11:30 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>> On 5/6/2018 10:23 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>>>> Nazi's are  Democratic Socialist, like Nancy Pelosie + Chuck
>>>>>> (pothead)
>>>>>> Schumer
>>>>>
>>>>> Nonsense ... and nonsense from someone Nadegda outed the other day as
>>>>> guess what? Oh, yeah, a Nazi, that was what.
>>>>
>>>> Outed? Puhleeze! As much as NAds loves ordering other people around to
>>>> do the things she believes they should be doing for their own good,
>>>> her Nazi views are obvious even though she probably only wears the
>>>> snappy uniform in private.
>>>
>>> PPOSTFU!
>>>
>>>> (Like the failed cartoonist who runs the "skeptical science"
>>>> warmballer fraudsite.)
>>>
>>> See above.
>>
>> Nads, the disgusting low whore wh<MUSHROOM CLOUD!>
> 
> Fucking misogynists. They're everywhere!
> 

so Nads the misandrist!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#369386

FromCheckmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
Date2018-05-07 13:49 -0700
Message-ID<MPG.355a5bd56a33d1e599392b@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#369380
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <pcqa3f$rk6$12@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
@gmail.invalid says...


> 
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Mon, 07 May 2018 15:15:41 -0400, benj wrote:
> 
> > On 5/7/2018 11:48 AM, kensi wrote:
> >> On 5/7/2018 10:36 AM, benj wrote:
> >>> On 5/6/2018 11:30 AM, kensi wrote:
> >>>> On 5/6/2018 10:23 AM, Sergio wrote:
> >>>>> Nazi's are  Democratic Socialist, like Nancy Pelosie + Chuck
> >>>>> (pothead)
> >>>>> Schumer
> >>>>
> >>>> Nonsense ... and nonsense from someone Nadegda outed the other day as
> >>>> guess what? Oh, yeah, a Nazi, that was what.
> >>>
> >>> Outed? Puhleeze! As much as NAds loves ordering other people around to
> >>> do the things she believes they should be doing for their own good,
> >>> her Nazi views are obvious even though she probably only wears the
> >>> snappy uniform in private.
> >> 
> >> PPOSTFU!
> >> 
> >>> (Like the failed cartoonist who runs the "skeptical science"
> >>> warmballer fraudsite.)
> >> 
> >> See above.
> > 
> > Nads, the disgusting low whore wh<MUSHROOM CLOUD!>
> 
> Fucking misogynists. They're everywhere!

Then there's the misandrists like you, K0okfArt.  I blame your kind for 
turning poor Gweggles gay.

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#369401

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-05-08 01:37 +0000
Message-ID<pcqv11$k5f$5@dont-email.me>
In reply to#369386
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Mon, 07 May 2018 13:49:58 -0700, Checkmate wrote:

> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!  In article <pcqa3f$rk6$12@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
> @gmail.invalid says...
> 
> 
> 
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>> melt!
>> On Mon, 07 May 2018 15:15:41 -0400, benj wrote:
>> 
>> > On 5/7/2018 11:48 AM, kensi wrote:
>> >> On 5/7/2018 10:36 AM, benj wrote:
>> >>> On 5/6/2018 11:30 AM, kensi wrote:
>> >>>> On 5/6/2018 10:23 AM, Sergio wrote:
>> >>>>> Nazi's are  Democratic Socialist, like Nancy Pelosie + Chuck
>> >>>>> (pothead)
>> >>>>> Schumer
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Nonsense ... and nonsense from someone Nadegda outed the other day
>> >>>> as guess what? Oh, yeah, a Nazi, that was what.
>> >>>
>> >>> Outed? Puhleeze! As much as NAds loves ordering other people around
>> >>> to do the things she believes they should be doing for their own
>> >>> good, her Nazi views are obvious even though she probably only
>> >>> wears the snappy uniform in private.
>> >> 
>> >> PPOSTFU!
>> >> 
>> >>> (Like the failed cartoonist who runs the "skeptical science"
>> >>> warmballer fraudsite.)
>> >> 
>> >> See above.
>> > 
>> > Nads, the disgusting low whore wh<MUSHROOM CLOUD!>
>> 
>> Fucking misogynists. They're everywhere!
> 
> Then there's the misandrists like you, K0okfArt.  I blame your kind for
> turning poor Gweggles gay.

Don't be ridiculous. Gerzzgl was gay long before I got here, and quite 
possibly before I was *born*.

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#369378

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-05-07 19:27 +0000
Message-ID<pcq9ab$rk6$5@dont-email.me>
In reply to#369361
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Mon, 07 May 2018 10:36:08 -0400, benj wrote:

> On 5/6/2018 11:30 AM, kensi wrote:
>> On 5/6/2018 10:23 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>> Nazi's are  Democratic Socialist, like Nancy Pelosie + Chuck (pothead)
>>> Schumer
>> 
>> Nonsense ... and nonsense from someone Nadegda outed the other day as
>> guess what? Oh, yeah, a Nazi, that was what.
>
> Outed? Puhleeze! As much as NAds loves ordering other people around to
> do the things she believes they should be doing for their own good, her
> Nazi views are obvious even though she probably only wears the snappy
> uniform in private.

:O

LIES!

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#369383

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2018-05-07 15:02 -0500
Message-ID<pcqbbj$1t8l$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#369378
On 5/7/2018 2:27 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Mon, 07 May 2018 10:36:08 -0400, benj wrote:
> 
>> On 5/6/2018 11:30 AM, kensi wrote:
>>> On 5/6/2018 10:23 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>> Nazi's are  Democratic Socialist, like Nancy Pelosie + Chuck (pothead)
>>>> Schumer
>>>
>>> Nonsense ... and nonsense from someone Nadegda outed the other day as
>>> guess what? Oh, yeah, a Nazi, that was what.
>>
>> Outed? Puhleeze! As much as NAds loves ordering other people around to
>> do the things she believes they should be doing for their own good, her
>> Nazi views are obvious even though she probably only wears the snappy
>> uniform in private.
> 
> :O
> 
> LIES!
> 


Nazisploitation !

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 7 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | alt.slack


csiph-web