Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.postmodern > #1578

Tarski, the polysemite

Show all headers | View raw

Tarski, god bless his soul, was not a Jew. You'd have to be a god
damned TERF, a Muslim, a Zionist, a Nazi, or someone on the far end of
woke horseshoe theory to externally determine someone's identity and
allegiance after they've publicly disavowed it. In this case 'semite'
is not derived from the way Zionist people subtly change their tune
like chameleons do their color, to always end up on the side of
innocent victims even when they're committing genocide. No, it is
derived from 'polysemous' which describes the way words can take on
similar or related meanings. Any coincidence with suggested Zionist
deception tactics is purely incidental.

Why would I lampshade Tarski as a polysemite then, a word that seems to
only exist in french dictionaries and is probably as far from his
preferences as a logician can get? He himself maintained the idea that
his theories were about logically defined terms, and could not be
related to everyday terms.

The thing is, even though Tarski was as clear about things as could be
possible, which would preclude him from being seen as a Jew or a
postmodernist (they deconstruct real life) there are many people
that would hitchhike on his fame and claim him for themselves.

So we arrive at Tarski the polysemite, a thing he would never have
wanted for himself, but history is cruel.

Back to alt.postmodern | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Tarski, the polysemite pataphor <pataphor@gmail.com> - 2024-01-09 06:44 +0100

csiph-web