Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.os.linux > #80143 > unrolled thread
| Started by | RabidPedagog <rabid@pedag.og> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2024-07-04 07:27 -0400 |
| Last post | 2025-03-27 11:03 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 62 — 20 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.os.linux
After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer RabidPedagog <rabid@pedag.og> - 2024-07-04 07:27 -0400
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-07-04 12:43 +0100
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-07-04 23:32 +0200
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-07-05 08:49 +1000
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-07-04 23:33 +0000
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer bad๐ฝsector <forgetski@_INVALID.net> - 2024-07-05 23:28 -0400
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer tinker123 <tinker123@gmail.com> - 2024-07-06 13:49 +0000
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2024-07-07 00:47 +0000
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer Sebastian <sebastian@here.com.invalid> - 2024-08-06 17:09 +0000
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-08-06 18:29 +0100
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-08-06 15:08 -0400
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2024-08-06 20:23 +0100
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-08-06 18:31 -0400
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer Tyrone <none@none.none> - 2025-03-28 20:43 +0000
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-08-06 21:38 +0200
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer Bobbie Sellers <blissInSanFrancisco@mouse-potato.com> - 2024-08-06 13:51 -0700
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer Sebastian <sebastian@here.com.invalid> - 2024-08-07 02:08 +0000
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-08-06 18:48 -0400
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-08-07 10:17 +0200
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-08-07 08:59 -0400
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2024-08-07 17:45 +0100
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-08-07 13:58 -0400
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer Bobbie Sellers <blissInSanFrancisco@mouse-potato.com> - 2024-08-07 11:15 -0700
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-08-07 19:46 +0200
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-08-07 17:04 -0400
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-08-08 10:36 +0200
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-08-08 08:04 -0400
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-08-08 22:11 +0200
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-08-09 08:46 -0400
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-08-09 17:16 +0200
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2024-08-06 20:46 +0000
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-08-06 18:55 -0400
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer TronNerd82 <tronnerd82@aol.com> - 2025-03-26 21:10 +0000
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-03-26 19:48 -0400
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-03-27 06:52 +0000
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-27 07:34 +0000
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-03-27 08:39 -0400
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-28 01:04 +0000
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-03-27 22:10 -0400
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-28 05:42 +0000
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-03-28 08:35 -0400
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-03-28 08:41 -0400
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-28 20:29 +0000
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-03-28 17:34 -0400
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-28 23:51 +0000
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-03-28 22:08 -0400
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-29 06:41 +0000
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-03-29 07:59 -0400
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-18 02:23 +0000
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-18 07:12 -0400
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-04-19 11:04 +0100
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-19 08:01 -0400
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-04-19 13:42 +0100
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-29 06:57 +0000
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-03-29 08:02 -0400
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-29 21:59 +0000
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-03-30 07:11 -0400
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-18 02:25 +0000
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-04-18 07:15 -0400
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer Jasen Betts <usenet@revmaps.no-ip.org> - 2025-03-29 04:56 +0000
Re: ๐ณ๏ธโ๐After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer๐ณ๏ธโ๐ ๐๐๐ป๐บ๐น๐ป๐๐ท๐บ๐Jen๐๐๐ป๐บ๐น๐ป๐๐ท๐บ๐ Dershmendenderer ๐๐ป๐บ๐น๐ป๐๐ท๐บ๐ถ็ฌ๐๐๐ป๐บ๐น๐ป๐๐ท๐บ๐ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2025-03-29 14:36 +0000
Re: After NixOS, faggots attack Ladybird web browser developer Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-03-27 11:03 -0400
Page 2 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 Next page →
| From | "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-08-07 17:45 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <20240807174500.c57670551c3ade483b65d46c@127.0.0.1> |
| In reply to | #80284 |
On Wed, 7 Aug 2024 08:59:47 -0400 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: > On 2024-08-07 4:17 a.m., D wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 6 Aug 2024, CrudeSausage wrote: > > > >> On 2024-08-06 3:38 p.m., D wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> On Tue, 6 Aug 2024, Sebastian wrote: > >>> > >>>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy tinker123 <tinker123@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>> I can understand being annoyed by such a request. > >>>>> > >>>>> I probably would have put my annoyance aside and granted it. > >>>>> > >>>>> A few harmless search and replace operations. > >>>>> > >>>>> I think people overreacted to the request. > >>>>> > >>>>> It was a small request. > >>>> > >>>> It wasn't the request itself that elicited that response, but > >>>> its purpose: Bringing SerenityOS in line with the left's rules. > >>>> > >>>> Now they're accusing the developers of being SLAVE OWNERS > >>>> because they didn't go along with the earlier demand that > >>>> all projects rename their master branches. They still call > >>>> their master branches "master". > >>>> > >>>> They're cracking down on thoughtcrime. What they're actually > >>>> offended by is that the developers don't find it offensive > >>>> to use "he" as the pronoun for a hypothetical person, and > >>>> they don't think there's anything wrong with the badspeak > >>>> word "master", which indicates that they haven't been > >>>> thinking what they were told to think. > >>>> > >>>> If anyone ever tells me to rename any of my projects' master > >>>> branches or else be branded RAYCISS, I'm renaming it to nigger. > >>>> > >>> > >>> Please do! Someone renaming their master branch to the nigger branch > >>> is worthy of donation solely for that act! > >>> > >>> When talking to extreme leftists I sometimes (when I'm in the mood) > >>> tell them that my pronoun is either master or negroe, and that they > >>> shall respect my pronoun. This is always a fun little exercise! =D > >> > >> Usimg their idiocy against them is the right thing to do. Every > >> conversation with these intellectual parasites should be an > >> opportunity to highlight their hypocrisy. > >> > > > > Amen! > > > > I remember once when I was in airport security and the guy asked if he > > could look through my things. I told him, "oh, so I have a choice? If I > > have a free choice, of course the answer is no". > > > > The guy actually smiled, I saw he got it, apologized and said he had to > > do it anyway since it was his job. Since I was in a good mood, I > > refrained from saying that the Nazi prison guards were also just doing > > their jobs. > > At the airport, security has no choice but to look through your stuff > but there is absolutely no reason for them to ask you to go through an > x-ray machine when they can just as easily pat you down. If ever they > ask you to step into an x-ray machine, the only answer is no, especially > if you were "randomly-selected" but you don't look like the angry, > sweating Muslim down the queue. > > -- > CrudeSausage > Catholic, paleoconservative, Christ is king > Progressives are brain-damaged demonic groomers Any chance of some linux content soon? -- Bah, and indeed Humbug.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-08-07 13:58 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <yBOsO.28146$D6Ha.9507@fx37.iad> |
| In reply to | #80285 |
On 2024-08-07 12:45 p.m., Kerr-Mudd, John wrote: > On Wed, 7 Aug 2024 08:59:47 -0400 > CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: > >> On 2024-08-07 4:17 a.m., D wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Tue, 6 Aug 2024, CrudeSausage wrote: >>> >>>> On 2024-08-06 3:38 p.m., D wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, 6 Aug 2024, Sebastian wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy tinker123 <tinker123@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> I can understand being annoyed by such a request. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I probably would have put my annoyance aside and granted it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> A few harmless search and replace operations. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I think people overreacted to the request. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It was a small request. >>>>>> >>>>>> It wasn't the request itself that elicited that response, but >>>>>> its purpose: Bringing SerenityOS in line with the left's rules. >>>>>> >>>>>> Now they're accusing the developers of being SLAVE OWNERS >>>>>> because they didn't go along with the earlier demand that >>>>>> all projects rename their master branches. They still call >>>>>> their master branches "master". >>>>>> >>>>>> They're cracking down on thoughtcrime. What they're actually >>>>>> offended by is that the developers don't find it offensive >>>>>> to use "he" as the pronoun for a hypothetical person, and >>>>>> they don't think there's anything wrong with the badspeak >>>>>> word "master", which indicates that they haven't been >>>>>> thinking what they were told to think. >>>>>> >>>>>> If anyone ever tells me to rename any of my projects' master >>>>>> branches or else be branded RAYCISS, I'm renaming it to nigger. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Please do! Someone renaming their master branch to the nigger branch >>>>> is worthy of donation solely for that act! >>>>> >>>>> When talking to extreme leftists I sometimes (when I'm in the mood) >>>>> tell them that my pronoun is either master or negroe, and that they >>>>> shall respect my pronoun. This is always a fun little exercise! =D >>>> >>>> Usimg their idiocy against them is the right thing to do. Every >>>> conversation with these intellectual parasites should be an >>>> opportunity to highlight their hypocrisy. >>>> >>> >>> Amen! >>> >>> I remember once when I was in airport security and the guy asked if he >>> could look through my things. I told him, "oh, so I have a choice? If I >>> have a free choice, of course the answer is no". >>> >>> The guy actually smiled, I saw he got it, apologized and said he had to >>> do it anyway since it was his job. Since I was in a good mood, I >>> refrained from saying that the Nazi prison guards were also just doing >>> their jobs. >> >> At the airport, security has no choice but to look through your stuff >> but there is absolutely no reason for them to ask you to go through an >> x-ray machine when they can just as easily pat you down. If ever they >> ask you to step into an x-ray machine, the only answer is no, especially >> if you were "randomly-selected" but you don't look like the angry, >> sweating Muslim down the queue. >> >> -- >> CrudeSausage >> Catholic, paleoconservative, Christ is king >> Progressives are brain-damaged demonic groomers > > Any chance of some linux content soon? I will quote the philosopher among us and say "oh, fuck off." -- CrudeSausage Catholic, paleoconservative, Christ is king Progressives are brain-damaged demonic groomers
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bobbie Sellers <blissInSanFrancisco@mouse-potato.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-08-07 11:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <v90djd$38jgp$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #80285 |
On 8/7/24 09:45, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote: > On Wed, 7 Aug 2024 08:59:47 -0400 > CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: > snip >> CrudeSausage >> Catholic, paleoconservative, Christ is king >> Progressives are brain-damaged demonic groomers > > Any chance of some linux content soon? Not from Crude Sausage, more likely to get patriarchal theology. But here is a nice news item/ > Found on the PCLinuxOS Users Forum! > > NVIDIA Transitions Fully Towards Open-Source GPU Kernel Modules > Jul 17, 2024 By Rob Armstrong, Kevin Mittman and Fred Oh > If you are using the Nvidia graphics card and having trouble > you may need to read this article. > <https://developer.nvidia.com/blog/nvidia-transitions-fully-towards-open-source-gpu-kernel-modules/> Dell Precision 7730- PCLOS 2024.07- Linux 6.6.43- Plasma 5.27.11 -- b l i s s - S F 4 e v e r at D S L E x t r e m e dot com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-08-07 19:46 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <eb52e35a-9f0b-a0a0-357f-9b1a95824703@example.net> |
| In reply to | #80284 |
On Wed, 7 Aug 2024, CrudeSausage wrote: >> I remember once when I was in airport security and the guy asked if he >> could look through my things. I told him, "oh, so I have a choice? If I >> have a free choice, of course the answer is no". >> >> The guy actually smiled, I saw he got it, apologized and said he had to do >> it anyway since it was his job. Since I was in a good mood, I refrained >> from saying that the Nazi prison guards were also just doing their jobs. > > At the airport, security has no choice but to look through your stuff but > there is absolutely no reason for them to ask you to go through an x-ray > machine when they can just as easily pat you down. If ever they ask you to > step into an x-ray machine, the only answer is no, especially if you were > "randomly-selected" but you don't look like the angry, sweating Muslim down > the queue. Ah, but they do have a choice. The choose freely to take that job, so that is why they always will have to listen to my arguments. ;) As for X-ray, no sir, I always take the manual way. Usually, well at least in some airports, that has been quicker too! I remember once in the US, I asked a security guard about it, and he sigh and said "oh, you're one of those, come with me", and he let me skip about 100 meter of queue, had a quick pat down, and was on my way!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-08-07 17:04 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <HjRsO.46021$YCP4.44660@fx47.iad> |
| In reply to | #80286 |
On 2024-08-07 1:46 p.m., D wrote: > > > On Wed, 7 Aug 2024, CrudeSausage wrote: > >>> I remember once when I was in airport security and the guy asked if >>> he could look through my things. I told him, "oh, so I have a choice? >>> If I have a free choice, of course the answer is no". >>> >>> The guy actually smiled, I saw he got it, apologized and said he had >>> to do it anyway since it was his job. Since I was in a good mood, I >>> refrained from saying that the Nazi prison guards were also just >>> doing their jobs. >> >> At the airport, security has no choice but to look through your stuff >> but there is absolutely no reason for them to ask you to go through an >> x-ray machine when they can just as easily pat you down. If ever they >> ask you to step into an x-ray machine, the only answer is no, >> especially if you were "randomly-selected" but you don't look like the >> angry, sweating Muslim down the queue. > > Ah, but they do have a choice. The choose freely to take that job, so > that is why they always will have to listen to my arguments. ;) > > As for X-ray, no sir, I always take the manual way. Usually, well at > least in some airports, that has been quicker too! > > I remember once in the US, I asked a security guard about it, and he > sigh and said "oh, you're one of those, come with me", and he let me > skip about 100 meter of queue, had a quick pat down, and was on my way! Same here. When I wnet on a trip to Portugal with my in-laws in 2013, I also insisted that they not agree to the x-ray machines. They are not there to help detect anything; they are there to make sure that the population gets a heavy dose of radiation. I notice that a lot of institutions have already come out to claim that these full-body scans are safe but they are not. -- CrudeSausage Catholic, paleoconservative, Christ is king Progressives are brain-damaged demonic groomers
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-08-08 10:36 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <8fda6b4d-dfdd-7f9f-9b17-e164acd8ba97@example.net> |
| In reply to | #80289 |
On Wed, 7 Aug 2024, CrudeSausage wrote: > On 2024-08-07 1:46 p.m., D wrote: >> >> >> On Wed, 7 Aug 2024, CrudeSausage wrote: >> >>>> I remember once when I was in airport security and the guy asked if he >>>> could look through my things. I told him, "oh, so I have a choice? If I >>>> have a free choice, of course the answer is no". >>>> >>>> The guy actually smiled, I saw he got it, apologized and said he had to >>>> do it anyway since it was his job. Since I was in a good mood, I >>>> refrained from saying that the Nazi prison guards were also just doing >>>> their jobs. >>> >>> At the airport, security has no choice but to look through your stuff but >>> there is absolutely no reason for them to ask you to go through an x-ray >>> machine when they can just as easily pat you down. If ever they ask you to >>> step into an x-ray machine, the only answer is no, especially if you were >>> "randomly-selected" but you don't look like the angry, sweating Muslim >>> down the queue. >> >> Ah, but they do have a choice. The choose freely to take that job, so >> that is why they always will have to listen to my arguments. ;) >> >> As for X-ray, no sir, I always take the manual way. Usually, well at >> least in some airports, that has been quicker too! >> >> I remember once in the US, I asked a security guard about it, and he >> sigh and said "oh, you're one of those, come with me", and he let me >> skip about 100 meter of queue, had a quick pat down, and was on my way! > > Same here. When I wnet on a trip to Portugal with my in-laws in 2013, I also > insisted that they not agree to the x-ray machines. They are not there to > help detect anything; they are there to make sure that the population gets a > heavy dose of radiation. I notice that a lot of institutions have already > come out to claim that these full-body scans are safe but they are not. > For me it is also about making sure there is always a choice. It is the same with electronic money vs cash, or public services that are only available through smart phones (with tracking) vs on pen and paper. The government wants to remove cash and they want to make sure that you need a tracking device on your person at all times. Nothing would make them happier. The silent majority are unaware and seldom think beyond the next TV-show. So as always it's the enlightened few who have to fight for the freedom of all the rest, while being hated for it, since they do not understand what it is all about and only see us as "that guy" who causes trouble all the time. I mean, look at china with their social credit score, or the truck protesters in canada, I think that should be enough of an example of how evil the government is, and how important it is not to become dependent on smart phones and virtual money.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-08-08 08:04 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <4v2tO.48369$WT8.41588@fx45.iad> |
| In reply to | #80291 |
On 2024-08-08 4:36 a.m., D wrote: > > > On Wed, 7 Aug 2024, CrudeSausage wrote: > >> On 2024-08-07 1:46 p.m., D wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Wed, 7 Aug 2024, CrudeSausage wrote: >>> >>>>> I remember once when I was in airport security and the guy asked if >>>>> he could look through my things. I told him, "oh, so I have a >>>>> choice? If I have a free choice, of course the answer is no". >>>>> >>>>> The guy actually smiled, I saw he got it, apologized and said he >>>>> had to do it anyway since it was his job. Since I was in a good >>>>> mood, I refrained from saying that the Nazi prison guards were also >>>>> just doing their jobs. >>>> >>>> At the airport, security has no choice but to look through your >>>> stuff but there is absolutely no reason for them to ask you to go >>>> through an x-ray machine when they can just as easily pat you down. >>>> If ever they ask you to step into an x-ray machine, the only answer >>>> is no, especially if you were "randomly-selected" but you don't look >>>> like the angry, sweating Muslim down the queue. >>> >>> Ah, but they do have a choice. The choose freely to take that job, so >>> that is why they always will have to listen to my arguments. ;) >>> >>> As for X-ray, no sir, I always take the manual way. Usually, well at >>> least in some airports, that has been quicker too! >>> >>> I remember once in the US, I asked a security guard about it, and he >>> sigh and said "oh, you're one of those, come with me", and he let me >>> skip about 100 meter of queue, had a quick pat down, and was on my way! >> >> Same here. When I wnet on a trip to Portugal with my in-laws in 2013, >> I also insisted that they not agree to the x-ray machines. They are >> not there to help detect anything; they are there to make sure that >> the population gets a heavy dose of radiation. I notice that a lot of >> institutions have already come out to claim that these full-body scans >> are safe but they are not. >> > > For me it is also about making sure there is always a choice. It is the > same with electronic money vs cash, or public services that are only > available through smart phones (with tracking) vs on pen and paper. > > The government wants to remove cash and they want to make sure that you > need a tracking device on your person at all times. Nothing would make > them happier. The silent majority are unaware and seldom think beyond > the next TV-show. > > So as always it's the enlightened few who have to fight for the freedom > of all the rest, while being hated for it, since they do not understand > what it is all about and only see us as "that guy" who causes trouble > all the time. > > I mean, look at china with their social credit score, or the truck > protesters in canada, I think that should be enough of an example of how > evil the government is, and how important it is not to become dependent > on smart phones and virtual money. I'll be the first to admit that I like the convenience of electronic money. While being totally anonymous, I have a problem with cash in that I always end up losing the pennies or forget that I even have bills on my person to pay for anything. Clearly, this makes it easy for the government and financial institutions to track me. At the same time, this is how decide what my credit score will be and whether it is safe to offer me a loan, so I can't complain too much. -- CrudeSausage Catholic, paleoconservative, Christ is king Progressives are brain-damaged demonic groomers
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-08-08 22:11 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <58d9d50d-2f18-ff09-fb33-954ab691f6c4@example.net> |
| In reply to | #80292 |
On Thu, 8 Aug 2024, CrudeSausage wrote: >> I mean, look at china with their social credit score, or the truck >> protesters in canada, I think that should be enough of an example of how >> evil the government is, and how important it is not to become dependent on >> smart phones and virtual money. > > I'll be the first to admit that I like the convenience of electronic money. > While being totally anonymous, I have a problem with cash in that I always > end up losing the pennies or forget that I even have bills on my person to > pay for anything. Clearly, this makes it easy for the government and > financial institutions to track me. At the same time, this is how decide what > my credit score will be and whether it is safe to offer me a loan, so I can't > complain too much. > That's how they lure you in, with ease and simplicity. But was anything really worth while ever easy and convenient or did you in fact have to work hard for it?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-08-09 08:46 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <wcotO.331965$89y.162037@fx18.iad> |
| In reply to | #80293 |
On 2024-08-08 4:11 p.m., D wrote: > > > On Thu, 8 Aug 2024, CrudeSausage wrote: > >>> I mean, look at china with their social credit score, or the truck >>> protesters in canada, I think that should be enough of an example of >>> how evil the government is, and how important it is not to become >>> dependent on smart phones and virtual money. >> >> I'll be the first to admit that I like the convenience of electronic >> money. While being totally anonymous, I have a problem with cash in >> that I always end up losing the pennies or forget that I even have >> bills on my person to pay for anything. Clearly, this makes it easy >> for the government and financial institutions to track me. At the same >> time, this is how decide what my credit score will be and whether it >> is safe to offer me a loan, so I can't complain too much. >> > > That's how they lure you in, with ease and simplicity. But was anything > really worth while ever easy and convenient or did you in fact have to > work hard for it? I had to work hard to be in a relationship and eventually a marriage, if that doesn't sound too ridiculous to anyone. The odds were stacked against me, but I managed to get myself out of my predicament. I turned out better than I was supposed to by my estimation. -- CrudeSausage Catholic, paleoconservative, Christ is king Progressives are brain-damaged demonic groomers
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-08-09 17:16 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <2ca7985a-753f-22ab-2146-1d54efda40b4@example.net> |
| In reply to | #80295 |
On Fri, 9 Aug 2024, CrudeSausage wrote: >> That's how they lure you in, with ease and simplicity. But was anything >> really worth while ever easy and convenient or did you in fact have to >> work hard for it? > > I had to work hard to be in a relationship and eventually a marriage, if that > doesn't sound too ridiculous to anyone. The odds were stacked against me, but > I managed to get myself out of my predicament. I turned out better than I was > supposed to by my estimation. > That's very inspiring and also similar to what my life taught me. That the most valuable things, you have to work hard for. Or perhaps they are the most valuable things you have, because you had to work hard for them? Regardless, happy to hear it!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-08-06 20:46 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lhfgdkF7b2uU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #80269 |
On Tue, 6 Aug 2024 17:09:44 -0000 (UTC), Sebastian <sebastian@here.com.invalid> wrote in <v8tlcm$1n18o$1@dont-email.me>: > In comp.os.linux.advocacy tinker123 <tinker123@gmail.com> wrote: >> I can understand being annoyed by such a request. >> >> I probably would have put my annoyance aside and granted it. >> >> A few harmless search and replace operations. >> >> I think people overreacted to the request. >> >> It was a small request. > > It wasn't the request itself that elicited that response, but > its purpose: Bringing SerenityOS in line with the left's rules. > > Now they're accusing the developers of being SLAVE OWNERS > because they didn't go along with the earlier demand that > all projects rename their master branches. They still call > their master branches "master". > > They're cracking down on thoughtcrime. What they're actually > offended by is that the developers don't find it offensive > to use "he" as the pronoun for a hypothetical person, and > they don't think there's anything wrong with the badspeak > word "master", which indicates that they haven't been > thinking what they were told to think. > > If anyone ever tells me to rename any of my projects' master > branches or else be branded RAYCISS, I'm renaming it to nigger. Uncalled-for. Too many racist POS's. Thread plonked. -- -v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti OS: Linux 6.11.0-rc2 Release: Mint 21.3 Mem: 258G
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-08-06 18:55 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <uRxsO.157248$ZhK.3333@fx14.iad> |
| In reply to | #80274 |
On 2024-08-06 4:46 p.m., vallor wrote: > On Tue, 6 Aug 2024 17:09:44 -0000 (UTC), Sebastian > <sebastian@here.com.invalid> wrote in <v8tlcm$1n18o$1@dont-email.me>: > >> In comp.os.linux.advocacy tinker123 <tinker123@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I can understand being annoyed by such a request. >>> >>> I probably would have put my annoyance aside and granted it. >>> >>> A few harmless search and replace operations. >>> >>> I think people overreacted to the request. >>> >>> It was a small request. >> >> It wasn't the request itself that elicited that response, but >> its purpose: Bringing SerenityOS in line with the left's rules. >> >> Now they're accusing the developers of being SLAVE OWNERS >> because they didn't go along with the earlier demand that >> all projects rename their master branches. They still call >> their master branches "master". >> >> They're cracking down on thoughtcrime. What they're actually >> offended by is that the developers don't find it offensive >> to use "he" as the pronoun for a hypothetical person, and >> they don't think there's anything wrong with the badspeak >> word "master", which indicates that they haven't been >> thinking what they were told to think. >> >> If anyone ever tells me to rename any of my projects' master >> branches or else be branded RAYCISS, I'm renaming it to nigger. > > Uncalled-for. > > Too many racist POS's. Thread plonked. Awwww, don't be a nignog. -- CrudeSausage Catholic, paleoconservative, Christ is king Progressives are brain-damaged demonic groomers
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | TronNerd82 <tronnerd82@aol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-26 21:10 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnvu8rab.sn4.tronnerd82@darkstar.voidgrinder.net> |
| In reply to | #80143 |
On 2024-07-04, RabidPedagog <rabid@pedag.og> wrote: ><https://lunduke.locals.com/upost/5823666/ladybird-web-browser-developer-attacked-by-unhinged-dishonest-activists> Oh boy, we're off to a great start with our source here... > Two days ago, the Ladybird Web Browser made quite a bit of news -- with > a major investment and the establishment of a new Non-Profit > organization to build a "from scratch" web browser. > > Positive, non-controversial, non-political, very nerdy news. Actually meaningful news. Can't wait to see what new developments come out of the project, and I sure can't wait to see the rest of your totally noteworthy and in no way idiotic post! > Unfortunately, within hours of the spotlight being directed at Ladybird, > a group of activists launched an all-out-assault on the open source web > browser -- by smearing it as "Transphobic", "Mysoginistic", and (this is > absolutely not a joke) suggesting that the Ladybird developers actively > support and promote human slavery. > > Hundreds of posts repeating such smears (among others) -- with one Tech > publication declaring a total boycott of Ladybird because of it. > > What vile deed were the developers of Ladybird guilty of, which > necessitated such an intense response, you ask? > > Well, I'll tell you. > > The Ladybird team stated... wait for it... > > ... that they were a "purely technical project". > > Seriously. That was their crime. Being "technical". > > Here's the details. > > (...) ...Aaaaannnndddd just like that, you drank the Lunduke Kool-Aid. You tried your best, but the second you linked to Lunduke's trash, you lost any shred of credibility. Better luck next time. :) -- I didn't choose the Slackware life. Oh wait, that's a big fat lie. But the Slackware life also chose me :)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-26 19:48 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nn0FP.104220$541.58089@fx47.iad> |
| In reply to | #81187 |
On 2025-03-26 5:10 p.m., TronNerd82 wrote: > On 2024-07-04, RabidPedagog <rabid@pedag.og> wrote: >> <https://lunduke.locals.com/upost/5823666/ladybird-web-browser-developer-attacked-by-unhinged-dishonest-activists> > > Oh boy, we're off to a great start with our source here... > >> Two days ago, the Ladybird Web Browser made quite a bit of news -- with >> a major investment and the establishment of a new Non-Profit >> organization to build a "from scratch" web browser. >> >> Positive, non-controversial, non-political, very nerdy news. > > Actually meaningful news. Can't wait to see what new developments come > out of the project, and I sure can't wait to see the rest of your > totally noteworthy and in no way idiotic post! > >> Unfortunately, within hours of the spotlight being directed at Ladybird, >> a group of activists launched an all-out-assault on the open source web >> browser -- by smearing it as "Transphobic", "Mysoginistic", and (this is >> absolutely not a joke) suggesting that the Ladybird developers actively >> support and promote human slavery. >> >> Hundreds of posts repeating such smears (among others) -- with one Tech >> publication declaring a total boycott of Ladybird because of it. >> >> What vile deed were the developers of Ladybird guilty of, which >> necessitated such an intense response, you ask? >> >> Well, I'll tell you. >> >> The Ladybird team stated... wait for it... >> >> ... that they were a "purely technical project". >> >> Seriously. That was their crime. Being "technical". >> >> Here's the details. >> >> (...) > > ...Aaaaannnndddd just like that, you drank the Lunduke Kool-Aid. You > tried your best, but the second you linked to Lunduke's trash, you lost > any shred of credibility. Better luck next time. :) A progressive, I'm sure. I don't know who you are, but I already know that I don't care about your opinion. -- God be with you, CrudeSausage John 14:6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-27 06:52 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vs2sij$3kqov$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #81188 |
On 26/03/2025 23:48, CrudeSausage wrote: > A progressive, I'm sure. I don't know who you are, but I already know > that I don't care about your opinion. Absolutely. The whole 'Progressive Cant' thing is about confusing data with metadata and moral opinions with facts. Engineering is about data, and facts. It has no political or moral content whatsoever. -- Climate is what you expect but weather is what you get. Mark Twain
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-27 07:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vs2v23$3nl2p$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #81189 |
On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 06:52:03 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > Engineering is about data, and facts. It has no political or moral > content whatsoever. Truly a statement worthy of Wernher von Braun.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-27 08:39 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <rGbFP.1380700$SZca.1091005@fx13.iad> |
| In reply to | #81190 |
On 2025-03-27 03:34, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 06:52:03 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > >> Engineering is about data, and facts. It has no political or moral >> content whatsoever. > > Truly a statement worthy of Wernher von Braun. And one which causes the heads of progressives to explode. Let's be reminded of Obama's brilliant words: "If you've got a business, you didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen." You see, even if you created a business out of your garage and invested your profits into hiring more people and eventually renting out some property to grow the enterprise, the government should be credited with its success as should random black or Hispanic people who never went anywhere near your business. -- God be with you, CrudeSausage John 14:6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-28 01:04 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vs4sih$1g5go$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #81191 |
On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 08:39:51 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: > On 2025-03-27 03:34, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >> >> On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 06:52:03 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> >>> Engineering is about data, and facts. It has no political or moral >>> content whatsoever. >> >> Truly a statement worthy of Wernher von Braun. > > And one which causes the heads of progressives to explode. โProgressivesโ ... didnโt they call them โRedsโ back in Senator McCarthyโs day? And you were supposed to check for them under the bed each night? Red has become the official colour of the US Republican Party these days. Coincidence? You be the judge.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-27 22:10 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <RynFP.688964$SVG3.6139@fx42.iad> |
| In reply to | #81193 |
On 2025-03-27 9:04 p.m., Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 08:39:51 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: > >> On 2025-03-27 03:34, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 06:52:03 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>> >>>> Engineering is about data, and facts. It has no political or moral >>>> content whatsoever. >>> >>> Truly a statement worthy of Wernher von Braun. >> >> And one which causes the heads of progressives to explode. > > โProgressivesโ ... didnโt they call them โRedsโ back in Senator McCarthyโs > day? And you were supposed to check for them under the bed each night? Whether you will admit it or not, McCarthy was right. There _were_ Communists around every corner and they were indeed seeking not only to take over Hollywood, but every other influential establishment in the United States. They've clearly taken over academia and managed to overwhelm Hollywood despite his efforts. > Red has become the official colour of the US Republican Party these days. > > Coincidence? You be the judge. The Republicans aren't the ones encouraging people to rid themselves of their genitalia through the teaching that "gender is a construct." -- God be with you, CrudeSausage John 14:6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-03-28 05:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vs5csc$21ub2$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #81194 |
On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 22:10:56 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: > Whether you will admit it or not, McCarthy was right. There _were_ > Communists around every corner and they were indeed seeking not only to > take over Hollywood, but every other influential establishment in the > United States. They've clearly taken over academia and managed to > overwhelm Hollywood despite his efforts. It never ceases to amaze me. With all your talk of โlibertyโ and โfreedom of expressionโ, that you could shut down your Communist Party, yet at the same time decide that the KKK were not such a big threat to society at all, just some kind of bunch of good ole boys having a bit of a lark, harmless fun or something bloody stupid like that. > On 2025-03-27 9:04 p.m., Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > >> Red has become the official colour of the US Republican Party these >> days. >> >> Coincidence? You be the judge. > > The Republicans aren't the ones encouraging people to rid themselves of > their genitalia through the teaching that "gender is a construct." Sex is biology. Gender is not.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.os.linux
csiph-web