Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.os.linux > #39203 > unrolled thread

Marek Novotny GnuPG

Started byMarek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com>
First post2016-09-26 00:00 +0000
Last post2016-09-26 15:18 +0000
Articles 8 on this page of 68 — 11 participants

Back to article view | Back to alt.os.linux

Contents

  Marek Novotny GnuPG Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-26 00:00 +0000
    Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2016-09-25 17:32 -0700
      Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-26 01:04 +0000
      Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG The Letter Q <babbaquimby@teachers.org> - 2016-09-26 11:12 -0400
    Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@invalid.es> - 2016-09-26 03:56 +0200
    Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2016-09-26 10:53 +0000
      Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2016-09-26 05:10 -0700
        Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2016-09-26 05:22 -0700
          Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2016-09-26 05:45 -0700
            Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2016-09-26 10:10 -0700
              Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2016-09-26 10:54 -0700
            Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2016-09-27 11:27 -0700
              Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-27 18:40 +0000
              Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Bit Twister <BitTwister@mouse-potato.com> - 2016-09-27 18:41 +0000
                Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2016-09-27 12:06 -0700
                Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2016-09-28 10:14 -0700
                  Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2016-09-28 10:38 -0700
              Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2016-09-27 11:44 -0700
                Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2016-09-27 19:00 +0000
                  Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2016-09-27 12:20 -0700
                    Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@invalid.es> - 2016-09-28 00:04 +0200
                      Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-09-27 23:21 +0100
                        Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2016-09-27 15:35 -0700
                        Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@invalid.es> - 2016-09-28 00:44 +0200
                          Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2016-09-27 15:58 -0700
              Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org> - 2016-09-27 19:24 -0400
                Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2016-09-28 01:06 -0700
                  Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2016-09-28 10:38 +0000
                  Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2016-09-28 11:21 -0700
              Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2016-09-28 10:31 +0000
                Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2016-09-28 11:24 +0000
                  Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@invalid.es> - 2016-09-28 16:08 +0200
                    Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2016-09-28 19:55 +0000
                      Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2016-09-28 13:11 -0700
                        Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2016-09-28 22:04 +0000
                          Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2016-09-28 16:11 -0700
          Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2016-09-26 13:27 +0000
            Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2016-09-26 06:59 -0700
        Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2016-09-26 13:25 +0000
      Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@invalid.es> - 2016-09-26 15:26 +0200
        Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2016-09-26 13:33 +0000
          Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@invalid.es> - 2016-09-26 15:40 +0200
            Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2016-09-26 13:48 +0000
        Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-09-26 14:39 +0100
          Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-26 07:00 -0700
            Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2016-09-26 07:26 -0700
              Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-26 14:53 +0000
              Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2016-09-26 14:59 +0000
                Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2016-09-26 15:01 +0000
              Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-26 07:34 -0700
                Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-26 18:24 +0200
                  Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-26 09:30 -0700
          Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@invalid.es> - 2016-09-26 16:31 +0200
            Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-09-26 15:59 +0100
              Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@invalid.es> - 2016-09-26 19:45 +0200
                Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2016-09-26 14:29 -0700
                  Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2016-09-26 14:37 -0700
                    Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2016-09-26 15:17 -0700
                      Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2016-09-26 23:27 +0000
          Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2016-09-26 15:00 -0700
            Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2016-09-26 15:34 -0700
              Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@invalid.es> - 2016-09-27 15:58 +0200
                Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2016-09-27 07:11 -0700
      Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-26 14:14 +0000
        Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2016-09-26 14:57 +0000
          Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-26 15:09 +0000
            Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-26 15:14 +0000
            Re: Marek Novotny GnuPG Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2016-09-26 15:18 +0000

Page 4 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4]

#39262

FromMike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid>
Date2016-09-26 15:34 -0700
Message-ID<e4tm3nFr9drU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#39259
Mike Easter wrote:
> Personally, I think I should be able to 'get' somehow, the long form
> from enigmail by using one of its menus, but I can't.

*AHA !!*

I've got it.  Enigmail's menu has a properties function which displays 
the fingerprint, which fingerprint is the best of all worlds, better in 
terms of specificity than the short or the long keyid.

And, the fingerprint 'contains' both; the short is the last 8 chars, the 
long is the last 16.

-- 
Mike Easter

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#39266

From"Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@invalid.es>
Date2016-09-27 15:58 +0200
Message-ID<ngaqbd-qut.ln1@Telcontar.valinor>
In reply to#39262
On 2016-09-27 00:34, Mike Easter wrote:
> Mike Easter wrote:
>> Personally, I think I should be able to 'get' somehow, the long form
>> from enigmail by using one of its menus, but I can't.
> 
> *AHA !!*
> 
> I've got it.  Enigmail's menu has a properties function which displays
> the fingerprint, which fingerprint is the best of all worlds, better in
> terms of specificity than the short or the long keyid.
> 
> And, the fingerprint 'contains' both; the short is the last 8 chars, the
> long is the last 16.

Yes, the information can be displayed, at least after downloading the
key. But one has no control on which is used when one tells Enigmail to
download the key of a message you have just received.

-- 
Cheers, Carlos.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#39267

FromMike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid>
Date2016-09-27 07:11 -0700
Message-ID<e4vd0kF950iU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#39266
Carlos E.R. wrote:
> Mike Easter wrote:
>> Mike Easter wrote:
>>> Personally, I think I should be able to 'get' somehow, the long
>>> form from enigmail by using one of its menus, but I can't.
>>
>> *AHA !!*
>>
>> I've got it. Enigmail's menu has a properties function which
>> displays the fingerprint, which fingerprint is the best of all
>> worlds, better in terms of specificity than the short or the long
>> keyid.
>>
>> And, the fingerprint 'contains' both; the short is the last 8
>> chars, the long is the last 16.
>
> Yes, the information can be displayed, at least after downloading
> the key. But one has no control on which is used when one tells
> Enigmail to download the key of a message you have just received.
>
If I'm understanding the debate between long and short correctly, and if 
we were having a round table discussion of our points of view, I think I 
would disagree with the concept of 'never use the short form'.

The keyservers use the short form.

I believe that the most comprehensive strategy in such example as you 
are giving is to use the short form to 'find' they key, in some rare 
circumstance possibly finding more than one, and use the FINGERPRINT, 
not the long form, to verify the correct key.

The fingerprint is stronger than the long form.  The short form is more 
convenient than either.

-- 
Mike Easter

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#39233

FromMarek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com>
Date2016-09-26 14:14 +0000
Message-ID<VqqdnbPPHNjBsHTKnZ2dnUU7-UFj4p2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#39216
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2016-09-26, Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> wrote:
>
> Marek Novotny wrote:
>>
>> Hi group, 
>>
>> I have added GnuPG signing to slrn and modified my signature a little to
>> share the public key with anyone who wishes to do verification.
>>
>> The GnuPG is performed via a macro. If you're interested in added
>> signing and verification to slrn yourself, see this macro download page:
>>
>> http://slrn.sourceforge.net/macros.html
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>
> Nice, have thought about seeking it out off and on myself.  Seems like
> now's as good a time as any to enable it.  (Here's hoping it pulls the
> right key, so I don't look like a moron).

Got your key. Just learned how to import them via the command line.
Nice. So I removed the longer signature as that's obviously my own
rookie mistake and not needed. 

- -- 
Marek Novotny
Git: https://github.com/marek-novotny

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=eO47
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#39239

FromDan Purgert <dan@djph.net>
Date2016-09-26 14:57 +0000
Message-ID<slrnnuidna.3fv.dan@xps-linux.djph.net>
In reply to#39233
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Marek Novotny wrote:
>
> On 2016-09-26, Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> wrote:
>>
>> Marek Novotny wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi group, 
>>>
>>> I have added GnuPG signing to slrn and modified my signature a little to
>>> share the public key with anyone who wishes to do verification.
>>>
>>> The GnuPG is performed via a macro. If you're interested in added
>>> signing and verification to slrn yourself, see this macro download page:
>>>
>>> http://slrn.sourceforge.net/macros.html
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>
>> Nice, have thought about seeking it out off and on myself.  Seems like
>> now's as good a time as any to enable it.  (Here's hoping it pulls the
>> right key, so I don't look like a moron).
>
> Got your key. Just learned how to import them via the command line.
> Nice. So I removed the longer signature as that's obviously my own
> rookie mistake and not needed. 
>
> - -- 
> Marek Novotny
> Git: https://github.com/marek-novotny
>


If you edit the gnupg-1.6.6.sl script on line 173 to read

  Prefs["append_sig"]     = 1;

it'll fix the "- --" break for your signature delimiter as well.  The
script is a little less than helpful in this regard, as reading through
makes it look like openssh / openssl / etc config files where the
settings have contextual comments telling you what's going on.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJX6TbpAAoJEI4R3fMSeaKBr7YH/iGm4Q30ustLBn8qORESReEa
oHWDDWpbOoHWDLuGz9ovaklXZd8NlONbJIwCWa5QNjIir03d1Fib9NPusZLZ2ARX
rmea6hXizYEfrpNTxWkafUXRLKJbwsij/KB9AGpKWSwcVdgXctdlbdNvLcxJleUu
tyzCpPzowZIsqdwfeaezkWynj+1b+jkuH+JrNyCfuhuWafLY9gR8+pQF/s2NDCBY
hmk2jKTXd+ufRhtyP29MDo1ARf+6orP3wLfipSvqYFz84P33lGgD0b5tqeJEn71z
DJbdFL4dnWpeQf8MXdO+aaKaFbP3wE6btlxvb+Lt2tJw7y8TCx6+kbC0J4EYd84=
=AEeQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
|_|O|_| Registered Linux user #585947
|_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert
|O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5  4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#39243

FromMarek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com>
Date2016-09-26 15:09 +0000
Message-ID<qYidnZ8VdMfZp3TKnZ2dnUU7-TOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#39239
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2016-09-26, Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> wrote:
>
> Marek Novotny wrote:
>>
>> On 2016-09-26, Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> Marek Novotny wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi group, 
>>>>
>>>> I have added GnuPG signing to slrn and modified my signature a little to
>>>> share the public key with anyone who wishes to do verification.
>>>>
>>>> The GnuPG is performed via a macro. If you're interested in added
>>>> signing and verification to slrn yourself, see this macro download page:
>>>>
>>>> http://slrn.sourceforge.net/macros.html
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>
>>> Nice, have thought about seeking it out off and on myself.  Seems like
>>> now's as good a time as any to enable it.  (Here's hoping it pulls the
>>> right key, so I don't look like a moron).
>>
>> Got your key. Just learned how to import them via the command line.
>> Nice. So I removed the longer signature as that's obviously my own
>> rookie mistake and not needed. 
>>
>> - -- 
>> Marek Novotny
>> Git: https://github.com/marek-novotny
>>
>
>
> If you edit the gnupg-1.6.6.sl script on line 173 to read
>
>   Prefs["append_sig"]     = 1;
>
> it'll fix the "- --" break for your signature delimiter as well.  The
> script is a little less than helpful in this regard, as reading through
> makes it look like openssh / openssl / etc config files where the
> settings have contextual comments telling you what's going on.

Okay,

I'm giving that a shot here...

- -- 
Marek Novotny
https://github.com/marek-novotny

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=egZC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#39245

FromMarek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com>
Date2016-09-26 15:14 +0000
Message-ID<w72dnaJMmrzFpnTKnZ2dnUU7-QmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#39243
On 2016-09-26, Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote:
>
> On 2016-09-26, Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> wrote:
>>
>> Marek Novotny wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2016-09-26, Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Marek Novotny wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi group, 
>>>>>
>>>>> I have added GnuPG signing to slrn and modified my signature a little to
>>>>> share the public key with anyone who wishes to do verification.
>>>>>
>>>>> The GnuPG is performed via a macro. If you're interested in added
>>>>> signing and verification to slrn yourself, see this macro download page:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://slrn.sourceforge.net/macros.html
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Nice, have thought about seeking it out off and on myself.  Seems like
>>>> now's as good a time as any to enable it.  (Here's hoping it pulls the
>>>> right key, so I don't look like a moron).
>>>
>>> Got your key. Just learned how to import them via the command line.
>>> Nice. So I removed the longer signature as that's obviously my own
>>> rookie mistake and not needed. 
>>>
>>> - -- 
>>> Marek Novotny
>>> Git: https://github.com/marek-novotny
>>>
>>
>>
>> If you edit the gnupg-1.6.6.sl script on line 173 to read
>>
>>   Prefs["append_sig"]     = 1;
>>
>> it'll fix the "- --" break for your signature delimiter as well.  The
>> script is a little less than helpful in this regard, as reading through
>> makes it look like openssh / openssl / etc config files where the
>> settings have contextual comments telling you what's going on.
>
> Okay,
>
> I'm giving that a shot here...

Ah, had to restart it. I thought since it is a macro I wouldn't need to
but I guess I do. It's fixed and won't do that again. 

Thanks!

-- 
Marek Novotny
https://github.com/marek-novotny

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#39247

FromDan Purgert <dan@djph.net>
Date2016-09-26 15:18 +0000
Message-ID<slrnnuievf.3fv.dan@xps-linux.djph.net>
In reply to#39243
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Marek Novotny wrote:
> On 2016-09-26, Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> wrote:
>> If you edit the gnupg-1.6.6.sl script on line 173 to read [...]
>
> Okay,
>
> I'm giving that a shot here...
>
> - -- 
> Marek Novotny
> https://github.com/marek-novotny
>

Hm, doesn't seem to have done it.  I might've had to restart slrn for
the change to take (only that line and the default key are different
between the original from sourceforge and my copy).

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJX6TvuAAoJEI4R3fMSeaKBc7MH/R5LGcs8m8httiyg0XTnEnjL
OcarQSXCOYRO7jvPCcGr/mvnvzPu3GNHAF83XiEEBjqNft5dQPTHuLItq4maYKgL
Jb+XchtFRVHaGfS5WRmJ2b1/hqOTOdmERWLQnh5SJgrCL804IwU4FMkv+h6cXHK0
ulRVQTIxC+IVxAC5yPCPfTTU4XOCdIdmLIRhDs2DUrBQiqzGHx1vwtNQnzuF56ig
rI1fPcWRAuUePDFViNg+b7AHNYWn8ceafejJ8t5EMeI2/v+KKxrco5TyVBBkQOvO
aVPzNb8JG4iCvjLOheOTfIS4qSfYQcQwmo5EEYsoM0BypEDlV8f3TGpp6nIcrTo=
=Gvjf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
|_|O|_| Registered Linux user #585947
|_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert
|O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5  4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 4 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4]

Back to top | Article view | alt.os.linux

csiph-web