Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.os.linux > #53893 > unrolled thread
| Started by | arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-02-17 20:23 +0000 |
| Last post | 2019-02-19 13:22 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 251 — 28 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.os.linux
What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-17 20:23 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-17 12:46 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-17 21:44 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-17 14:29 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-17 23:15 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-18 10:49 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-18 02:21 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-18 12:13 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 15:17 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-18 09:30 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 22:22 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-18 23:33 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 23:14 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-19 00:33 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 23:41 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:22 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:00 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:06 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2019-02-18 18:39 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 22:22 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 08:41 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-18 20:32 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2019-02-18 21:38 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 22:22 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-18 23:30 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 23:18 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:18 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 22:22 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 15:17 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-18 09:31 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 22:22 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 22:28 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-18 16:55 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-18 10:18 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-18 21:24 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 22:22 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 22:22 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-18 23:47 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 23:26 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-19 00:35 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 23:40 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:21 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-02-19 21:33 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:21 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-18 15:55 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 00:15 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-19 00:36 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 00:56 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-19 03:24 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 15:07 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2019-02-19 01:39 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-19 01:51 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-19 03:25 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-19 02:36 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 15:06 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-19 16:00 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:25 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-19 18:28 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2019-02-19 19:05 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-19 11:52 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 21:13 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-19 21:33 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-19 13:43 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-19 22:00 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 22:20 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-19 22:55 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 22:10 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-19 14:24 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 23:04 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 17:20 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-19 15:23 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-19 23:25 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-20 13:23 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-20 09:15 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-20 18:41 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-20 22:59 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-20 22:11 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 15:39 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2019-02-19 23:22 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-20 13:42 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-20 12:57 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Ken Hart <kwhart1@frontier.com> - 2019-02-20 14:51 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-20 21:49 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-20 12:51 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 10:17 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Wildman <best_lay@yahoo.com> - 2019-02-19 10:32 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 00:43 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-18 16:48 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 00:54 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:50 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:52 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:25 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-19 00:27 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 00:49 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 08:58 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2019-02-18 05:31 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 15:17 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-18 09:13 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 22:43 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2019-02-18 16:50 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 23:31 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:10 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-18 12:24 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 22:52 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2019-02-18 17:02 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 23:31 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 23:08 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2019-02-18 18:01 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 00:56 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 00:56 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 15:17 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 15:38 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2019-02-18 09:59 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 16:22 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-18 16:32 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 16:38 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? shemp14@outlook.com - 2019-02-18 17:01 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2019-02-18 11:15 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2019-02-18 12:05 -0700
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-18 14:15 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2019-02-18 21:44 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2019-02-18 16:47 -0700
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 01:05 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:56 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-02-20 06:03 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2019-02-20 10:56 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2019-02-20 19:20 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-20 12:09 -0800
PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-21 15:30 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-21 09:50 -0600
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-21 07:52 -0800
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-21 16:52 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-21 09:12 -0800
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-21 19:34 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-02-22 13:31 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-21 17:32 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-21 19:23 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-21 18:20 +0000
PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-21 16:52 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-21 17:06 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-21 19:03 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-21 20:15 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-21 20:53 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-21 21:28 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-21 18:37 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-21 20:07 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-21 20:38 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2019-02-21 15:19 -0600
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2019-02-21 21:34 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2019-02-22 01:14 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-25 01:53 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-02-22 04:20 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-02-20 19:17 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2019-02-19 01:12 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-18 20:18 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 23:32 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? bje@ripco.com - 2019-02-19 11:37 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:19 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-18 20:44 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2019-02-18 13:41 -0700
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 01:10 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? bje@ripco.com - 2019-02-19 11:40 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 15:06 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:58 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 23:52 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2019-02-19 12:16 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 21:16 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-02-20 05:51 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Ken Hart <kwhart1@frontier.com> - 2019-02-18 19:18 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 01:12 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Ken Hart <kwhart1@frontier.com> - 2019-02-18 21:33 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2019-02-18 21:50 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-19 11:26 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-19 11:00 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 15:06 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-19 15:46 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-20 23:05 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-20 23:53 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-02-21 06:02 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-20 16:03 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-21 00:15 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 15:06 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 15:06 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2019-02-19 08:49 -0700
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Johnny <johnny@invalid.net> - 2019-02-19 10:01 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2019-02-19 16:45 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-20 12:05 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2019-02-21 20:59 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-21 22:36 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2019-02-22 18:29 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-22 20:03 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2019-02-22 15:42 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 15:06 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 10:01 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2019-02-19 09:06 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 15:06 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2019-02-19 11:12 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 15:07 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 10:15 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2019-02-19 12:21 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-20 12:07 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2019-02-20 10:52 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-20 23:07 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-20 17:17 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 23:16 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-20 15:38 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 00:11 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-20 16:23 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-20 16:31 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 08:54 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Lucifer <LuciferMorningstar@bigpond.com> - 2019-02-23 08:32 +1100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-22 13:52 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Ken Hart <kwhart1@frontier.com> - 2019-02-23 10:33 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-23 16:39 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 08:54 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-21 01:29 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-20 17:02 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? 123456789 <12345@12345.com> - 2019-02-20 19:36 -0700
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-21 12:17 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? 123456789 <12345@12345.com> - 2019-02-21 10:32 -0700
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2019-02-21 20:45 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-21 22:42 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-21 16:52 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-22 20:05 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-22 16:36 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-23 14:15 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-23 08:31 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-18 14:16 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 16:28 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-18 16:40 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 16:45 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Wildman <best_lay@yahoo.com> - 2019-02-18 10:10 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 16:28 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? georg.schwarz@freenet.de (Georg Schwarz) - 2019-02-18 22:35 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 00:10 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:42 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 23:55 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2019-02-18 18:04 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 01:14 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? bje@ripco.com - 2019-02-19 11:40 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 15:06 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-19 19:43 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Wildman <best_lay@yahoo.com> - 2019-02-19 15:42 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2019-02-19 19:02 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? anonymous <a@a.invalid> - 2019-02-20 00:22 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-20 00:24 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? kass <kass@kake.invalid> - 2019-02-20 00:44 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-20 00:49 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? lwo <a@a.invalid> - 2019-02-20 00:59 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-02-19 20:56 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-19 13:22 -0800
Page 11 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12 13 Next page →
| From | "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-20 12:07 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <d1pvjf-j1d.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> |
| In reply to | #54053 |
On 19/02/2019 18.21, Barry Margolin wrote: > In article <q4fi1i$18dl$1@gioia.aioe.org>, > Ken Hart <kwhart1@frontier.com> wrote: > >> On 2/17/19 6:15 PM, arlen holder wrote: >>> On Sun, 17 Feb 2019 14:29:54 -0800, Mike Easter wrote: >>> >>>> I have no interest in that question and I'm under no obligation to even >>>> consider it worth discussing. >>> >>> The question is actually very simple & rather easy to comprehend Mike. >>> >>> Knowledgeable users who know the answer can add to our knowledge. >>> >>> Q: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? >>> >> >> Google is your friend. >> >> I copied and pasted your question into Google; it came back with "About >> 481,000 results (0.78 seconds)" >> >> The seventh result down the page was "25 Best Free Web Proxies for Safer >> and Anonymous Surfing | SpyAdvice >> https://spyadvice.com/free-web-proxies/" >> While I didn't check out the cite/site, it does mention "It also >> supports Usenet... posting..." > > Since you can post to Usenet through the Google Groups website, any web > proxy does that. That doesn't make it an NNTP proxy. I assume that Google Groups demands a proper google identity. -- Cheers, Carlos.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-20 10:52 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <barmar-E037B5.10525720022019@reader.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #54091 |
In article <d1pvjf-j1d.ln1@Telcontar.valinor>, "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote: > On 19/02/2019 18.21, Barry Margolin wrote: > > In article <q4fi1i$18dl$1@gioia.aioe.org>, > > Ken Hart <kwhart1@frontier.com> wrote: > > > >> On 2/17/19 6:15 PM, arlen holder wrote: > >>> On Sun, 17 Feb 2019 14:29:54 -0800, Mike Easter wrote: > >>> > >>>> I have no interest in that question and I'm under no obligation to even > >>>> consider it worth discussing. > >>> > >>> The question is actually very simple & rather easy to comprehend Mike. > >>> > >>> Knowledgeable users who know the answer can add to our knowledge. > >>> > >>> Q: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? > >>> > >> > >> Google is your friend. > >> > >> I copied and pasted your question into Google; it came back with "About > >> 481,000 results (0.78 seconds)" > >> > >> The seventh result down the page was "25 Best Free Web Proxies for Safer > >> and Anonymous Surfing | SpyAdvice > >> https://spyadvice.com/free-web-proxies/" > >> While I didn't check out the cite/site, it does mention "It also > >> supports Usenet... posting..." > > > > Since you can post to Usenet through the Google Groups website, any web > > proxy does that. That doesn't make it an NNTP proxy. > > I assume that Google Groups demands a proper google identity. For posting, I assume you're correct. Most NNTP servers require a login, too. There are a few exceptions, like AIOE. -- Barry Margolin Arlington, MA
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-20 23:07 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <rlv0kf-ule.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> |
| In reply to | #54097 |
On 20/02/2019 16.52, Barry Margolin wrote: > In article <d1pvjf-j1d.ln1@Telcontar.valinor>, > "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote: > >> On 19/02/2019 18.21, Barry Margolin wrote: >>> In article <q4fi1i$18dl$1@gioia.aioe.org>, >>> Ken Hart <kwhart1@frontier.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 2/17/19 6:15 PM, arlen holder wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 17 Feb 2019 14:29:54 -0800, Mike Easter wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I have no interest in that question and I'm under no obligation to even >>>>>> consider it worth discussing. >>>>> >>>>> The question is actually very simple & rather easy to comprehend Mike. >>>>> >>>>> Knowledgeable users who know the answer can add to our knowledge. >>>>> >>>>> Q: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Google is your friend. >>>> >>>> I copied and pasted your question into Google; it came back with "About >>>> 481,000 results (0.78 seconds)" >>>> >>>> The seventh result down the page was "25 Best Free Web Proxies for Safer >>>> and Anonymous Surfing | SpyAdvice >>>> https://spyadvice.com/free-web-proxies/" >>>> While I didn't check out the cite/site, it does mention "It also >>>> supports Usenet... posting..." >>> >>> Since you can post to Usenet through the Google Groups website, any web >>> proxy does that. That doesn't make it an NNTP proxy. >> >> I assume that Google Groups demands a proper google identity. > > For posting, I assume you're correct. > > Most NNTP servers require a login, too. There are a few exceptions, like > AIOE. Yes, certainly, but in the case of google they have to go with their real mail address visible, while many of us in usenet do not. -- Cheers, Carlos.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-20 17:17 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <200220191717191942%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #54110 |
In article <rlv0kf-ule.ln1@Telcontar.valinor>, Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote: > >>> Since you can post to Usenet through the Google Groups website, any web > >>> proxy does that. That doesn't make it an NNTP proxy. > >> > >> I assume that Google Groups demands a proper google identity. > > > > For posting, I assume you're correct. > > > > Most NNTP servers require a login, too. There are a few exceptions, like > > AIOE. > > Yes, certainly, but in the case of google they have to go with their > real mail address visible, while many of us in usenet do not. nope, because usually, it's a fake email.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-20 23:16 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <BdlbE.12049$kD6.8986@fx10.fr7> |
| In reply to | #54112 |
On 20/02/2019 22:17, nospam wrote: > In article <rlv0kf-ule.ln1@Telcontar.valinor>, Carlos E.R. > <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote: > >>>>> Since you can post to Usenet through the Google Groups website, any web >>>>> proxy does that. That doesn't make it an NNTP proxy. >>>> >>>> I assume that Google Groups demands a proper google identity. >>> >>> For posting, I assume you're correct. >>> >>> Most NNTP servers require a login, too. There are a few exceptions, like >>> AIOE. >> >> Yes, certainly, but in the case of google they have to go with their >> real mail address visible, while many of us in usenet do not. > > nope, because usually, it's a fake email. If email 'works', how can it be "fake" email? -- David B. Devon, UK
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-20 15:38 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <gd66ndF3rs7U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #54115 |
David in Devon wrote: > nospam wrote: >> Carlos E.R. wrote: >> >>>>>> Since you can post to Usenet through the Google Groups >>>>>> website, any web proxy does that. That doesn't make it an >>>>>> NNTP proxy. >>>>> >>>>> I assume that Google Groups demands a proper google identity. >>>> >>>> For posting, I assume you're correct. >>>> >>>> Most NNTP servers require a login, too. There are a few exceptions, >>>> like AIOE. >>> >>> Yes, certainly, but in the case of google they have to go with their >>> real mail address visible, while many of us in usenet do not. >> >> nope, because usually, it's a fake email. > > If email 'works', how can it be "fake" email? > The above cited terms are 'ambiguous' here: proper google identity google ... real mail address fake email In the case of free email addresses such as gmail's, each gmail address is 'real' in the sense that it functions as an email address and is associated with a gmail account. As opposed to some truly 'bogus' email address which is constructed 'out of whole cloth' to populate such as a From which From might be a social engineering construct of a spam or scam or phish to appear to the uninformed mail reader as if it were from a girl or a bank or whatever, which it is not. In order to post to GG, the user must have (and use) a google account. Whether that google account bears any resemblance to one's true 'identity' is NOT necessary. Maybe a term like 'artificial' (real) account would be better. Such an artificial (artificially created) account functions just like a real account corresponding to one's 'real life' name or identity. Another nntp provider besides aioe which doesn't require login/authentication/ registration/ is mixmin, arlen's nntp. -- Mike Easter
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-21 00:11 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <b1mbE.138809$4r2.83426@fx25.fr7> |
| In reply to | #54116 |
On 20/02/2019 23:38, Mike Easter wrote: > David in Devon wrote: >> nospam wrote: >>> Carlos E.R. wrote: >>> >>>>>>> Since you can post to Usenet through the Google Groups >>>>>>> website, any web proxy does that. That doesn't make it an >>>>>>> NNTP proxy. >>>>>> >>>>>> I assume that Google Groups demands a proper google identity. >>>>> >>>>> For posting, I assume you're correct. >>>>> >>>>> Most NNTP servers require a login, too. There are a few exceptions, >>>>> like AIOE. >>>> >>>> Yes, certainly, but in the case of google they have to go with their >>>> real mail address visible, while many of us in usenet do not. >>> >>> nope, because usually, it's a fake email. >> >> If email 'works', how can it be "fake" email? >> > The above cited terms are 'ambiguous' here: > > proper google identity > google ... real mail address > fake email > > In the case of free email addresses such as gmail's, each gmail address > is 'real' in the sense that it functions as an email address and is > associated with a gmail account. > > As opposed to some truly 'bogus' email address which is constructed 'out > of whole cloth' to populate such as a From which From might be a social > engineering construct of a spam or scam or phish to appear to the > uninformed mail reader as if it were from a girl or a bank or whatever, > which it is not. > > In order to post to GG, the user must have (and use) a google account. > Whether that google account bears any resemblance to one's true > 'identity' is NOT necessary. > > Maybe a term like 'artificial' (real) account would be better. > > Such an artificial (artificially created) account functions just like a > real account corresponding to one's 'real life' name or identity. > > Another nntp provider besides aioe which doesn't require > login/authentication/ registration/ is mixmin, arlen's nntp. Thank you for clarifying, Mike. There's a great deal which 'nospam' could learn from you, even though he pretends to be an Apple App 'Developer' (but she refuses to disclose WHICH Apps they are. How honest is that, eh?!!!) -- David B. Devon, UK
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-20 16:23 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <gd69bqF4bv0U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #54119 |
David in Devon wrote: > There's a great deal which 'nospam' could learn from you, even though he > pretends to be an Apple App 'Developer' (but she refuses to disclose > WHICH Apps they are. How honest is that, eh?!!!) I haven't seen anything 'inaccurate' from nospam in my brief time viewing hir msgs; just generally terse and sometimes of a 'terse opinion', as opposed to an some other opinion with more verbiage to support itself. 'Too terse' might be better than 'too verbose' -- or sometimes not. (For some reason) I'm reminded of the great exchange in Amadeus when the emperor and Mozart had an exchange: Emperor Joseph II: My dear young man, don't take it too hard. Your work is ingenious. It's quality work. And there are simply too many notes, that's all. Just cut a few and it will be perfect. Mozart: Which few did you have in mind, Majesty? -- Mike Easter
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-20 16:31 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <gd69qgF4fvgU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #54121 |
Mike Easter wrote: > (For some reason) I'm reminded of the great exchange in Amadeus when the > emperor and Mozart had an exchange: > > Emperor Joseph II: My dear young man, don't take it too hard. Your work > is ingenious. It's quality work. And there are simply too many notes, > that's all. Just cut a few and it will be perfect. > > Mozart: Which few did you have in mind, Majesty? Or was it this one: The emperor: ''Too beautiful for our ears, my dear Mozart, and monstrous many notes.'' Mozart: ''Exactly as many as are necessary, Your Majesty.'' -- Mike Easter
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-21 08:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <qHtbE.166619$Hn2.54622@fx19.fr7> |
| In reply to | #54122 |
On 21/02/2019 00:31, Mike Easter wrote: > Mike Easter wrote: >> (For some reason) I'm reminded of the great exchange in Amadeus when >> the emperor and Mozart had an exchange: >> >> Emperor Joseph II: My dear young man, don't take it too hard. Your >> work is ingenious. It's quality work. And there are simply too many >> notes, that's all. Just cut a few and it will be perfect. >> >> Mozart: Which few did you have in mind, Majesty? > > Or was it this one: > > The emperor: ''Too beautiful for our ears, my dear Mozart, and monstrous > many notes.'' > > Mozart: ''Exactly as many as are necessary, Your Majesty.'' Both good! :-) -- David B. Devon, UK
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lucifer <LuciferMorningstar@bigpond.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-23 08:32 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <ufq07e1478ua5q9ncrcf4tmidmrfhqca49@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #54128 |
No need for a proxy. Try Eternal-September.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-22 13:52 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <gdb982F7hdhU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #54164 |
Lucifer wrote: > No need for a proxy. > Try Eternal-September. > arlen can't decide how many criteria his mission needs to satisfy: a.h. said: > o The IP address that is PUBLIC is what matters most .... > o It's a secondary consideration to have privacy at the NNTP server ... > o It's a tertiary consideration ot have privacy at the ISP ... So, it might be 'sufficient' to have the connectivity IP sufficiently encrypted from the public such as e-s does (and others); OR... it MIGHT also be necessary to sign up for the free e-s account (or other) with an anonymous email; OR... it might ALSO be necessary to somehow achieve one's internet connectivity with some kind of anonymity. By structuring a progressively ambiguous difficulty, a.h. is in total control of criticizing any suggestions for a 'solution'. AND... we haven't even begun to start naming all of the different possible platforms with which one needs (to satisfy the mysterious a.h. equation) to accomplish these goals. ios,mac,linux,win,android -- Mike Easter
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ken Hart <kwhart1@frontier.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-23 10:33 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q4rp3t$qrq$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #54166 |
On 2/22/19 4:52 PM, Mike Easter wrote: > Lucifer wrote: >> No need for a proxy. >> Try Eternal-September. >> > arlen can't decide how many criteria his mission needs to satisfy: > > a.h. said: >> o The IP address that is PUBLIC is what matters most .... >> o It's a secondary consideration to have privacy at the NNTP server ... >> o It's a tertiary consideration ot have privacy at the ISP ... > > So, it might be 'sufficient' to have the connectivity IP sufficiently > encrypted from the public such as e-s does (and others); > > OR... > > it MIGHT also be necessary to sign up for the free e-s account (or > other) with an anonymous email; > > OR... > > it might ALSO be necessary to somehow achieve one's internet > connectivity with some kind of anonymity. > > By structuring a progressively ambiguous difficulty, a.h. is in total > control of criticizing any suggestions for a 'solution'. > > AND... we haven't even begun to start naming all of the different > possible platforms with which one needs (to satisfy the mysterious a.h. > equation) to accomplish these goals. ios,mac,linux,win,android > > It seems like a. h. has too much time on his hands. I'm starting a Go Fund Me page to buy him all of the Bob Ross "Joy of Painting" DVD's and books. Then a. h. can spend his time painting "happy little trees". (For anyone who doesn't know Bob Ross, he had a 'how to paint' program on PBS. In a half-hour show, he taught people how to paint a 'masterpiece', with "happy little trees" wherever you wanted, because "it's your world, and you should paint what makes you happy".) There's more milk and cookies at the children's table. -- Ken Hart kwhart1@frontier.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-23 16:39 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnq72tpa.452.dan@djph.net> |
| In reply to | #54178 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Ken Hart wrote: > [...] > I'm starting a Go Fund Me page to buy him all of the Bob Ross "Joy of > Painting" DVD's and books. Then a. h. can spend his time painting "happy > little trees". I'll save you some effort -- they're all on YouTube already! Just gotta get some more Titanium Hhwhite, and beat the devil out of my 2-inch brush. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEBcqaUD8uEzVNxUrujhHd8xJ5ooEFAlxxdycACgkQjhHd8xJ5 ooGEPwf/dFTrMF+RmYjGxpkNPm50WwN/7WTS28h3XxR/eNUbPNF42aFf1OJkS0Mf huwwcUEbdxLAXXh2tNiIscr/rcETrLGxjs8A7EM7zoVaB7Uwiq1rfq0vrgeKVZgu 80Pg1/ylH8v5p8gS/Y5KeUoJHIw3+hDXAxbJJBEYvURHk+uyOJj2q5gAY1ezfeKO RkWyCXK7tWcwYBWIcD63cGijG+3w4t+1qNbp3d3UB7TJGWVRlk2lNgYg0L/jFwZP K6DL2fEak0hk0KzPQsrFdQ7tKKnTp3nPo9r7iUKwEIkR2aiiq0nKKbWLHcY8k7KN OKq4POthOq6CXlNX33FuNoJ3k0qhHA== =wX2p -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- |_|O|_| |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert |O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5 4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-21 08:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <PGtbE.166618$Hn2.122723@fx19.fr7> |
| In reply to | #54121 |
On 21/02/2019 00:23, Mike Easter wrote: > David in Devon wrote: >> There's a great deal which 'nospam' could learn from you, even though >> he pretends to be an Apple App 'Developer' (but she refuses to >> disclose WHICH Apps they are. How honest is that, eh?!!!) > > I haven't seen anything 'inaccurate' from nospam in my brief time > viewing hir msgs; just generally terse and sometimes of a 'terse > opinion', as opposed to an some other opinion with more verbiage to > support itself. > > 'Too terse' might be better than 'too verbose' -- or sometimes not. Try reading "hir"'s messages in 'rec.photo.digital' Knowledge is good but attitude poor. > (For some reason) I'm reminded of the great exchange in Amadeus when the > emperor and Mozart had an exchange: > > Emperor Joseph II: My dear young man, don't take it too hard. Your work > is ingenious. It's quality work. And there are simply too many notes, > that's all. Just cut a few and it will be perfect. > > Mozart: Which few did you have in mind, Majesty? Ha! :-D -- David B. Devon, UK
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-21 01:29 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <n081kf-jfl.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> |
| In reply to | #54116 |
On 21/02/2019 00.38, Mike Easter wrote: > David in Devon wrote: >> nospam wrote: >>> Carlos E.R. wrote: >>> >>>>>>> Since you can post to Usenet through the Google Groups >>>>>>> website, any web proxy does that. That doesn't make it an >>>>>>> NNTP proxy. >>>>>> >>>>>> I assume that Google Groups demands a proper google identity. >>>>> >>>>> For posting, I assume you're correct. >>>>> >>>>> Most NNTP servers require a login, too. There are a few exceptions, >>>>> like AIOE. >>>> >>>> Yes, certainly, but in the case of google they have to go with their >>>> real mail address visible, while many of us in usenet do not. >>> >>> nope, because usually, it's a fake email. >> >> If email 'works', how can it be "fake" email? >> > The above cited terms are 'ambiguous' here: > > proper google identity > google ... real mail address > fake email > > In the case of free email addresses such as gmail's, each gmail address > is 'real' in the sense that it functions as an email address and is > associated with a gmail account. The point I make is that those people that are posting to usenet through Google Groups web service have to use a valid and identified Gmail (aka Google) account, and thus they are using their correct and working email address in the From header, so they are not anonymous. Thus a proxy that uses Google Groups website is not an anonymizer. -- Cheers, Carlos.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-20 17:02 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <gd6bl4F4qv4U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #54123 |
Carlos E.R. wrote: > Mike Easter wrote: >> The above cited terms are 'ambiguous' here: >> >> proper google identity >> google ... real mail address >> fake email >> >> In the case of free email addresses such as gmail's, each gmail address >> is 'real' in the sense that it functions as an email address and is >> associated with a gmail account. > > The point I make is that those people that are posting to usenet through > Google Groups web service have to use a valid and identified Gmail (aka > Google) account, and thus they are using their correct and working email > address in the From header, so they are not anonymous. Thus a proxy that > uses Google Groups website is not an anonymizer. > A couple of the (MANY) problems with using GG to read and post to usenet are: - GG trivially obfuscates the gmail address and only in GG, not in usenet nntp, making the From gmail address harvestable by xover bots or others - variably historically, GG posts the nntp-posting-host in the clear, generally providing the connectivity IP of the poster So, those people who feel that they 'must' use GG because they haven't figured out some other way to access by nntp from a particular location or connectivity situation, find themselves needing to access GG some other way than directly, such as a web proxy. -- Mike Easter
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | 123456789 <12345@12345.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-20 19:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <q4l2qt$lu2$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #54123 |
On 2/20/2019 5:29 PM, Carlos E.R. wrote: > those people that are posting to usenet through > Google Groups web service have to use a valid and identified Gmail (aka > Google) account, and thus they are using their correct and working email > address in the From header, so they are not anonymous. Google Groupies can use a throwaway Google email address. (I won't use the word 'fake' so that I won't upset the word usage cops here.) Google throwaways are easy to get, I have several. And they're reasonably anonymous for most uses. > Thus a proxy that uses Google Groups website is not an anonymizer. I also use a throwaway Google address and fake name for logging into the Usenet servers that require it. Then I use a different name and address in the newsreader. So now you know my secret: My real name isn't 123456789... ;) It's probably not CIA proof but for Usenet it's reasonably anonymous.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-21 12:17 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <nvd2kf-2mt.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> |
| In reply to | #54125 |
On 21/02/2019 03.36, 123456789 wrote: > On 2/20/2019 5:29 PM, Carlos E.R. wrote: > >> those people that are posting to usenet through >> Google Groups web service have to use a valid and identified Gmail (aka >> Google) account, and thus they are using their correct and working email >> address in the From header, so they are not anonymous. > > Google Groupies can use a throwaway Google email address. (I won't use > the word 'fake' so that I won't upset the word usage cops here.) Google > throwaways are easy to get, I have several. And they're reasonably > anonymous for most uses. What do you call "throwaway Google email address"? Does google say they are throwaway? Or is it just a standard Google email address that you only use, perhaps temporarily, for the purpose of posting to google groups? I assume it is the later. In that case, they still are proper mail addresses to which we can send mail directly. And given justified need, like a court order, Google can identify the person. > >> Thus a proxy that uses Google Groups website is not an anonymizer. > > I also use a throwaway Google address and fake name for logging into the > Usenet servers that require it. Then I use a different name and address > in the newsreader. So now you know my secret: My real name isn't > 123456789... ;) So do I, but neither of us is using google groups to post here. > > It's probably not CIA proof but for Usenet it's reasonably anonymous. > -- Cheers, Carlos.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | 123456789 <12345@12345.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-21 10:32 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <q4mnbl$8hu$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #54129 |
On 2/21/2019 4:17 AM, Carlos E.R. wrote: > On 21/02/2019 03.36, 123456789 wrote: > What do you call "throwaway Google email address"? "Throwaway" email addresses are an old Internet term that means pretty much what it says. They're disposable. I use them to hide my identity from places that I want to visit and require a log in. If one starts getting too much garbage the address is disposable. > Does google say they are throwaway? No. But it's not exactly a well kept secret either... > Or is it just a standard Google email address that you only use, > perhaps temporarily, for the purpose of posting to google groups? Yup. That's how one can remain REASONABLY anonymous on Google Groups. > they still are proper mail addresses to which we can send mail > directly. True. And if you don't want to see the email you just program Gmail to delete all incoming. The result (for you) is the same as a fake email address on a newsreader. > And given justified need, like a court order, Google can identify the > person. Probably depends on how the person acquired the throwaway. Google would have to give the fake name to the court but finding the real person from there? My email subterfuge would likely be easy to uncover but I'm sure others here could do a more thorough job... >> I also use a throwaway Google address and fake name for logging >> into the Usenet servers that require it. > So do I, but neither of us is using google groups to post here. Perhaps not here, but Google Groups has lots more than just Usenet...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 11 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12 13 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.os.linux
csiph-web