Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.os.linux > #53893 > unrolled thread
| Started by | arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-02-17 20:23 +0000 |
| Last post | 2019-02-19 13:22 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 251 — 28 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.os.linux
What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-17 20:23 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-17 12:46 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-17 21:44 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-17 14:29 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-17 23:15 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-18 10:49 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-18 02:21 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-18 12:13 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 15:17 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-18 09:30 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 22:22 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-18 23:33 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 23:14 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-19 00:33 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 23:41 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:22 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:00 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:06 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2019-02-18 18:39 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 22:22 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 08:41 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-18 20:32 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2019-02-18 21:38 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 22:22 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-18 23:30 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 23:18 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:18 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 22:22 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 15:17 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-18 09:31 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 22:22 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 22:28 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-18 16:55 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-18 10:18 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-18 21:24 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 22:22 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 22:22 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-18 23:47 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 23:26 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-19 00:35 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 23:40 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:21 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-02-19 21:33 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:21 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-18 15:55 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 00:15 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-19 00:36 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 00:56 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-19 03:24 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 15:07 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2019-02-19 01:39 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-19 01:51 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-19 03:25 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-19 02:36 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 15:06 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-19 16:00 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:25 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-19 18:28 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2019-02-19 19:05 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-19 11:52 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 21:13 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-19 21:33 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-19 13:43 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-19 22:00 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 22:20 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-19 22:55 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 22:10 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-19 14:24 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 23:04 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 17:20 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-19 15:23 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-19 23:25 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-20 13:23 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-20 09:15 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-20 18:41 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-20 22:59 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-20 22:11 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 15:39 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2019-02-19 23:22 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-20 13:42 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-20 12:57 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Ken Hart <kwhart1@frontier.com> - 2019-02-20 14:51 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-20 21:49 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-20 12:51 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 10:17 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Wildman <best_lay@yahoo.com> - 2019-02-19 10:32 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 00:43 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-18 16:48 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 00:54 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:50 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:52 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:25 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-19 00:27 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 00:49 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 08:58 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2019-02-18 05:31 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 15:17 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-18 09:13 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 22:43 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2019-02-18 16:50 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 23:31 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:10 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-18 12:24 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 22:52 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2019-02-18 17:02 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 23:31 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 23:08 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2019-02-18 18:01 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 00:56 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 00:56 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 15:17 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 15:38 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2019-02-18 09:59 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 16:22 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-18 16:32 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 16:38 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? shemp14@outlook.com - 2019-02-18 17:01 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2019-02-18 11:15 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2019-02-18 12:05 -0700
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-18 14:15 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2019-02-18 21:44 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2019-02-18 16:47 -0700
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 01:05 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:56 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-02-20 06:03 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2019-02-20 10:56 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2019-02-20 19:20 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-20 12:09 -0800
PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-21 15:30 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-21 09:50 -0600
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-21 07:52 -0800
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-21 16:52 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-21 09:12 -0800
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-21 19:34 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-02-22 13:31 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-21 17:32 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-21 19:23 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-21 18:20 +0000
PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-21 16:52 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-21 17:06 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-21 19:03 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-21 20:15 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-21 20:53 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-21 21:28 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-21 18:37 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-21 20:07 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-21 20:38 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2019-02-21 15:19 -0600
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2019-02-21 21:34 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2019-02-22 01:14 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-25 01:53 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-02-22 04:20 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-02-20 19:17 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2019-02-19 01:12 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-18 20:18 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 23:32 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? bje@ripco.com - 2019-02-19 11:37 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:19 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-18 20:44 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2019-02-18 13:41 -0700
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 01:10 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? bje@ripco.com - 2019-02-19 11:40 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 15:06 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:58 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 23:52 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2019-02-19 12:16 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 21:16 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-02-20 05:51 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Ken Hart <kwhart1@frontier.com> - 2019-02-18 19:18 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 01:12 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Ken Hart <kwhart1@frontier.com> - 2019-02-18 21:33 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2019-02-18 21:50 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-19 11:26 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-19 11:00 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 15:06 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-19 15:46 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-20 23:05 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-20 23:53 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-02-21 06:02 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-20 16:03 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-21 00:15 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 15:06 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 15:06 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2019-02-19 08:49 -0700
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Johnny <johnny@invalid.net> - 2019-02-19 10:01 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2019-02-19 16:45 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-20 12:05 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2019-02-21 20:59 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-21 22:36 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2019-02-22 18:29 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-22 20:03 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2019-02-22 15:42 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 15:06 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 10:01 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2019-02-19 09:06 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 15:06 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2019-02-19 11:12 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 15:07 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 10:15 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2019-02-19 12:21 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-20 12:07 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2019-02-20 10:52 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-20 23:07 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-20 17:17 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 23:16 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-20 15:38 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 00:11 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-20 16:23 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-20 16:31 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 08:54 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Lucifer <LuciferMorningstar@bigpond.com> - 2019-02-23 08:32 +1100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-22 13:52 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Ken Hart <kwhart1@frontier.com> - 2019-02-23 10:33 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-23 16:39 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 08:54 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-21 01:29 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-20 17:02 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? 123456789 <12345@12345.com> - 2019-02-20 19:36 -0700
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-21 12:17 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? 123456789 <12345@12345.com> - 2019-02-21 10:32 -0700
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2019-02-21 20:45 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-21 22:42 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-21 16:52 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-22 20:05 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-22 16:36 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-23 14:15 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-23 08:31 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-18 14:16 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 16:28 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-18 16:40 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 16:45 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Wildman <best_lay@yahoo.com> - 2019-02-18 10:10 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 16:28 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? georg.schwarz@freenet.de (Georg Schwarz) - 2019-02-18 22:35 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 00:10 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:42 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 23:55 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2019-02-18 18:04 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 01:14 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? bje@ripco.com - 2019-02-19 11:40 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 15:06 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-19 19:43 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Wildman <best_lay@yahoo.com> - 2019-02-19 15:42 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2019-02-19 19:02 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? anonymous <a@a.invalid> - 2019-02-20 00:22 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-20 00:24 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? kass <kass@kake.invalid> - 2019-02-20 00:44 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-20 00:49 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? lwo <a@a.invalid> - 2019-02-20 00:59 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-02-19 20:56 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-19 13:22 -0800
Page 7 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 … 5 6 [7] 8 9 … 13 Next page →
| From | William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-18 21:44 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q4f8vb$l9o$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #53931 |
On 2019-02-18, Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> wrote: > On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 11:15:26 -0600, Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> > wrote: > >>On 02/18/2019 11:01 AM, shemp14@outlook.com wrote: >>> >>> On 18-Feb-2019, Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> wrote: >>> >>>>> Worse, here is my RESPONSE to MIke's privacy rant: >>>>> A. Mike essentially makes the claim that I have to DEFEND my right to >>>>> privacy. >>>>> B. I respond, strongly, with cites, that this is a common ignorant >>>>> statement. >>>>> C. When I ask Mike to provide cites backing up his ignorant claim, he >>>>> can't. >>>>> >>> >>> >>>>> Let's state the super obvious things here: >>>>> 1. Nobody has to defend their right to privacy. >>>>> 2. If you (Paul or Mike) want to claim otherwise, then back it up with >>>>> cites. >>>>> 3. Rest assured, I already provided Mike with cites proving my point of >>>>> view. >>> >>> >>>> What the hell are cites? >>> >>> References. >>> >> >>Thanks, I was mistaking it for sites. > > > As far as I'm concerned, you are right, and the original post with the > word "cites" is wrong. "Cite" is a verb, not a noun. The noun is > "citation." > > I'm sure I'm going to get arguments about this, telling me I'm an old > fuddy-duddy and I'm behind the times. So I'll repeat my first five > words in the paragraph above: "as far as I'm concerned." English has the ability of making verbs into nouns. The Vancouver Sun Run. Run is a verb, but in that context it is a nounified verb, ie a noun. This happens, and has happened for hundreds of years, in English. On the other hand, confusing sites and cites is like confusing any other two homophones. to,two,too.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-18 16:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <hqfm6etrhr3tvjmhm8e48nr08rg58pl54v@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #53943 |
On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 21:44:11 -0000 (UTC), William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> wrote: >On 2019-02-18, Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> wrote: >> On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 11:15:26 -0600, Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> >> wrote: >> >>>On 02/18/2019 11:01 AM, shemp14@outlook.com wrote: >>>> >>>> On 18-Feb-2019, Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> Worse, here is my RESPONSE to MIke's privacy rant: >>>>>> A. Mike essentially makes the claim that I have to DEFEND my right to >>>>>> privacy. >>>>>> B. I respond, strongly, with cites, that this is a common ignorant >>>>>> statement. >>>>>> C. When I ask Mike to provide cites backing up his ignorant claim, he >>>>>> can't. >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>> Let's state the super obvious things here: >>>>>> 1. Nobody has to defend their right to privacy. >>>>>> 2. If you (Paul or Mike) want to claim otherwise, then back it up with >>>>>> cites. >>>>>> 3. Rest assured, I already provided Mike with cites proving my point of >>>>>> view. >>>> >>>> >>>>> What the hell are cites? >>>> >>>> References. >>>> >>> >>>Thanks, I was mistaking it for sites. >> >> >> As far as I'm concerned, you are right, and the original post with the >> word "cites" is wrong. "Cite" is a verb, not a noun. The noun is >> "citation." >> >> I'm sure I'm going to get arguments about this, telling me I'm an old >> fuddy-duddy and I'm behind the times. So I'll repeat my first five >> words in the paragraph above: "as far as I'm concerned." > >English has the ability of making verbs into nouns. I knew I would get an argument. Maybe more are coming. You are certainly right. There are many, many examples of that. Some of those have been around for a long time. Some of them started very recently. Making nouns out of verbs is only one example of the way English changes. It also makes verbs out of nouns, and changes in many other ways. Like all languages, English changes over the years. Today's English isn't the same as Shakespeare's, and Shakespeare's wasn't the same as Chaucer's. And Italian isn't the same as Latin. I'm well aware of that. It's the nature of language. I can't object to that; it's a fact of life. But I can object to it's happening very quickly. To my way of thinking, because of television and the Internet, these days it happens too quickly, much more quickly than it used to. Too quickly, to me, means that it's very difficult for everyone to keep up with it, and the result is that communication is impeded. So wherever possible, I personally avoid those "nouns" made of verbs. I say (and write) "clean installation, " not "clean install," "invitation" not "invite," "citation" not "cite," and many other examples that don't spring to the mind at the moment. I know. I'm an old fuddy-duddy and I'm behind the times. So be it. There's an office complex near my home that has a sign in front of it: "If you officed here, you'd be home now." Besides making up the verb "office" from the noun "office," the sign makes no sense.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-19 01:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q4fkov$4vt$1@news.mixmin.net> |
| In reply to | #53972 |
On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 16:47:21 -0700, Ken Blake wrote: > There's an office complex near my home that has a sign in front of it: > "If you officed here, you'd be home now." Besides making up the verb > "office" from the noun "office," the sign makes no sense. I very much appreciate that the point was brought up, as I strive to speak (Am)English correctly, even as Usenet is a "casual" ad hoc medium. The folks like Cybe(r) Wizard and Dan Purgert, et al., have found that I thank them, and appreciate when my English is corrected, when done so with a helpful intent. In the case of Rene Lamontagne, it's not lost on anyone that his contribution (as has been that of Dan Purgert) to this thread has been negative value added, hence, Rene was, likely ecstatic that he _thought_ he found an "error" in my facts, much like Snit used to revel in his accusations that my facts are wrong. HINT: Watch this hilarious Snit video on the YouTube web site about me. <https://youtu.be/7QaABa6DFIo> (Snit video) DOUBLEHINT: Snit posted that cite to that site hundreds of times. TRIPLEHINT: He _thought_ he _finally_ found my facts wrong. QUADRUPLEHINT: He was so _sure_ of himself, just like Mike Easter was. And yet, Snit never even _once_ comprehended the Y axis. Notice, the similarity to what Mike Easter and Carlos and Frank Slootweg (who was part of that Snit drama, by the way, despite the fact Frank tries to distance himself from his idiocy every time I mention it), are doing here. All Snit saw ... was a pretty graph. The graph was moving. Hooray! Just like a mouse sees a laser pointer moving... o The mouse POUNCES on it. Just like Mike did, when he saw the keyword "VPN". o Snit is a keyword troll, and so is Mike Easter a keyword troll. The moment they see a "moving graph", that's it. o Their brain goes into cat-pouncing-on-laser mode. It's like an alcoholic's response to being offered a drink. o They can't resist being a keyword troll. They think it's me confused, but all I did was ask this simple question: Q: Does a free proxy even exist to post using free nntp news servers? A: Name just one.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-19 09:56 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <20190219095657.534a3aa7@WizardsTower> |
| In reply to | #53990 |
On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 01:05:35 -0000 (UTC) arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> wrote: > The folks like Cybe(r) Wizard and Dan Purgert, et al., have found > that I thank them, and appreciate when my English is corrected, when > done so with a helpful intent. That is true and likely to be the only true thing you'll read from the childish, inbred, keyword-trolling, cat-pouncing-on-laser, left side of the DK scale jackass who wrote it. -- Cybe R. Wizard My other computer is a HOLMES IV with the Mycroft OS
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-20 06:03 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q4iqjm$re8$2@gonzo.alcatraz> |
| In reply to | #53990 |
On 2019-02-19, arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> wrote: > They think it's me confused, but all I did was ask this simple question: > Q: Does a free proxy even exist to post using free nntp news servers? > A: Name just one. > They think it's me confused, but all I did was ask this simple question: > Q: Does a free proxy even exist to post using free nntp news servers? yes, if you keep repeating the same question you will keep getting the same answer. for example leafnode is free, and inn is free. leafonode is a proxy and inn is a server. > A: Name just one. What do you mean by "A"? -- When I tried casting out nines I made a hash of it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-20 10:56 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <barmar-A768E4.10563220022019@reader.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #54089 |
In article <q4iqjm$re8$2@gonzo.alcatraz>, Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> wrote: > On 2019-02-19, arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> wrote: > > They think it's me confused, but all I did was ask this simple question: > > Q: Does a free proxy even exist to post using free nntp news servers? > > A: Name just one. > > > They think it's me confused, but all I did was ask this simple question: > > Q: Does a free proxy even exist to post using free nntp news servers? > > yes, if you keep repeating the same question you will keep getting the > same answer. > > for example leafnode is free, and inn is free. leafonode is a proxy > and inn is a server. If you're going to bother responding to him, stop being deliberately obtuse. He's not looking for proxy software, he's looking for a proxy service. He explained his goal, so the ambiguity in the language has been resolved and you just look like an a-hole giving the same answer over and over. -- Barry Margolin Arlington, MA
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-20 19:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q4kcqa.858.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #54098 |
Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> wrote: > In article <q4iqjm$re8$2@gonzo.alcatraz>, > Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> wrote: > > > On 2019-02-19, arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> wrote: > > > They think it's me confused, but all I did was ask this simple question: > > > Q: Does a free proxy even exist to post using free nntp news servers? > > > A: Name just one. > > > > > They think it's me confused, but all I did was ask this simple question: > > > Q: Does a free proxy even exist to post using free nntp news servers? > > > > yes, if you keep repeating the same question you will keep getting the > > same answer. > > > > for example leafnode is free, and inn is free. leafonode is a proxy > > and inn is a server. > > If you're going to bother responding to him, stop being deliberately > obtuse. > > He's not looking for proxy software, he's looking for a proxy service. > He explained his goal, so the ambiguity in the language has been > resolved and you just look like an a-hole giving the same answer over > and over. Easy does it! Don't blame the respondents, blame the culprit/OP. Your wording towards Jasen is uncalled for. Yes, he's looking for a service. No. it's not at all clear that he's looking for a *proxy* service. *He* *thinks* he's looking for a proxy service, because he misunderstood an article which Mike Easter had pointed to. His use of the term 'proxy' especially in (non-)connection with "free nntp news servers" is only muddling the waters. I*M*O, but I might be wrong as well, because arlen is clear as mud and only spewing bollocks and insults instead of information/clarification, he's looking for an anonymizer service, specifically one which conceals his IP address. Calling this a proxy service is, again IMO, incorrect/ uninformed terminology. All-in-all, I think Mike described it very well in this post of today: <news:gd3ac3Feue6U1@mid.individual.net> or <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?STYPE=msgid&A=0&MSGI=%3Cgd3ac3Feue6U1@mid.individual.net%3E>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-20 12:09 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <gd5qeuF183nU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #54101 |
Frank Slootweg wrote: > he's looking for an anonymizer service, specifically one which conceals > his IP address. Calling this a proxy service is, again IMO, incorrect/ > uninformed terminology. Now I'm thinking that his 'problem' is that he wants to use mixmin because it is a text nntp provider which doesn't require authentication; but that mixmin, unlike eternal-september or news.individual.net or others which have a 'complex' x-trace or NPH or other string which contains some derivative of the connecting IP 'smushed' with other variable information such as unix time, mixmin's info is /simply/ some kind of hash of the connecting IP. That makes mixmin's info much much more crackable by header readers than say NIN or e-s. arlen tends to make himself more of a target to usenet header readers who become his adversaries because he so frequently shifts into an abusive rude dialog with ad hominem slurs toward those who have some different view than his own. Using a VPN as a method of concealing his own IP connectivity is one strategy for solving his dilemma, but I don't think it is an ideal one. Open nntp/s not requiring authentication have their own problems in managing their servers which are different from those server admins which require authentication, and providing services to those who 'beat'/defeat the nntp admin's methods isn't exactly 'fair play'. mixmin provides mail2news as one avenue of an anonymized posting and helps users with anonymizing with mixmaster and bananasplit advice, so maybe the mixmin's admin is in agreement with arlen's use of VPN or other strategies to conceal his IP to mitigate mixmin's 'weakness' in obfuscating the connecting IP from prying eyes which would decrypt or 'dehash' the mixmin info line. -- Mike Easter
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-21 15:30 +0000 |
| Subject | PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? |
| Message-ID | <q4mg73$1vls$1@adenine.netfront.net> |
| In reply to | #54104 |
On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 12:09:01 -0800, Mike Easter wrote: > Using a VPN as a method of concealing his own IP connectivity is one > strategy for solving his dilemma, but I don't think it is an ideal one. Mike, I'm addressing this to you because you have often been an adult. I'm a man of action, so, I ask you a simple 3-word bullshit test: o Name just one I also ask that you stop incessantly assuming I beat my wife, Mike. o Just stop with the nefarious bullshit o If the only way your argument works is that I'm a pedophile, Mike o Then you have no argument, Mike. *Please assume only one thing & one thing only: PRIVACY* Think about that. o All your arguments FAIL if I'm _not_ a pedophile, Mike. You're no different than GoodGuy, Mike, o Your argument & GoodGuy's are EXACTLY the same, Mike. Just stop it with the nefarious bullshit, Mike. o Simply assume we all have a basic right to PRIVACY Mike. And stop with the specific server bullshit, Mike. o Each and every server provides a _different_ problem set But they're all the same, in the end, MIke. o For reasons known to you only, you do NOT comprehend that. The only on topic answer is a working PRIVACY based solution... o Anything else is complete, total, and utter bullshit, Mike. And you know I don't handle bullshit well, Mike. o It's all people like Jasen, Frank, Dan et al., _can_ do, Mike. I can't make you comprehend the simplest of PRIVACY Mike. o I can just give you the simplest of EXAMPLES, Mike. Here is the simplest of the simplest of the simplest of tests: 1. Post using Netfront (like I am doing right now, Mike). 2. Tell me how to _change_ the resulting NNTP posting host to anything 3. The goal is to not be static, and not to be mine (it's simple, Mike) That's the _simplest_ I can explain the problem set, Mike. o If you can't solve _that_ problem, then you are spewing bullshit. Here's the NNTP Posting Host, Mike: o 187.182.172.64 (bbb6ac40.virtua.com.br) o Serviços de Comunicação S.A. (AS28573), o NET Virtua, City: Guarulhos, Sao Paulo, Brazil o <https://www.whois.com/whois/187.182.172.64> etc. HINT: I'd _love_ to use a proxy; if it worked as well as does VPN. o Name just one If there's a better way to arbitrarily change the posting host to any of thousands of choices at any moment in time, then, Mike: o *Name just one* --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-21 09:50 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? |
| Message-ID | <20190221095042.0570134b@WizardsTower> |
| In reply to | #54130 |
On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 15:30:44 +0000 (UTC) arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> wrote: > On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 12:09:01 -0800, Mike Easter wrote: > > > Using a VPN as a method of concealing his own IP connectivity is > > one strategy for solving his dilemma, but I don't think it is an > > ideal one. > > Mike, > > I'm addressing this to you because you have often been an adult. > Adding, "PRIVACY," to the subject line does not constitute a new thread. In : Message-ID: <q4h633$rnh$1@news.mixmin.net> you said, "I formally now leave this thread." You've posted to this thread 6 (six) times since. Liar. You, "sir," are a being of no honor. -- Cybe R. Wizard My other computer is a HOLMES IV with the Mycroft OS
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-21 07:52 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? |
| Message-ID | <gd7vq6FfmivU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #54130 |
arlen holder wrote: > 3. The goal is to not be static, and not to be mine Notice that you did NOT include free or any privacy consideration between you and the nntp admin. If you are 'fuzzy' in your 'requirements' then those who would answer are going to have a harder time, because then the respondent has to say IF this THEN that but if THAT then THIS. But, just given that your above requirement can include exposing your identity to the nntp provider but not exposing your connecting IP to the usenet masses: - don't use an nntp provider which displays the connecting IP in the clear, like dotsrc/sunsite, netfront, or one which might not be hard to decrypt like mixmin - do use an nntp provider which creates a more complicated and variable NPH content string. I know of eternal-september and individual and there are likely more which DO require authentication or even payment - if you open the door to nntp accounts which require authentication, you have a lot more choices. Then/And/But, if you also need to conceal your identity from the nntp provider, which you have previously stated that you do NOT; you have to devise a different strategy for that. You can assume that they ALL keep logs. -- Mike Easter
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-21 16:52 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? |
| Message-ID | <q4ml16$2gih$1@adenine.netfront.net> |
| In reply to | #54132 |
On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 07:52:37 -0800, Mike Easter wrote:
> Notice that you did NOT include free or any privacy consideration
> between you and the nntp admin.
Hi Mike,
Thank you for being an adult in your response.
o In this thread, I will _try_ to only respond to adult posts.
Also, I will _always_ focus on a BETTER solution Mike
o I WANT a better solution than VPN Mike
But if every proposal is utterly WORSE than the current VPN solution, Mike
o Then that PROXY proposal is not viable Mike, would you agree?
My use model is EXTREMELY SIMPLE Mike
o It's not ME who is confused Mike.
This is the _simplest_ WORKING example I can provide to you Mike:
o My NNTP Posting host, Mike, is 78.228.100.3
o That hails from France, Mike, Le Landreau is the city
o The region is Loire-Atlantique, & the ISP is Free SAS
This is the SIMPLEST working example I can give you Mike.
o I'm clearly choosing my IP address using VPN as a "glorified proxy"
o Simply tell me how to make THIS EXACT EXAMPLE work, with a proxy
Mike: Anything else is bullshit, Mike.
o My whole point is that I don't want non-working bullshit, Mike.
You can tell me to _change_ my NNTP server, Mike
o But that's bullshit, Mike.
The solution ALREADY works with ANY NNTP server, Mike.
o If your answer _only_ works with _some_ servers, Mike,
o Then it's a bullshit answer, Mike.
Remember, I'd LOVE to have a "proxy-based" solution Mike
o I never once said I wasn't using VPN as a "glorified proxy", Mike.
But your proxy solution has to work at least as well, Mike
o Otherwise, it's utter, complete, and total bullshit, Mike.
And you know how much I hate bullshit Mike.
o I'm a man of working solutions, Mike; not bullshit.
I am of reasonable intelligence (if that), and yet, I can't comprehend why
you're so extremely and incessantly hung up on the relatively minor
connection between me and the NNTP server, Mike.
Let me give you a SIMPLE answer, Mike:
o I have a neighbor who snoops on me (hypothetically speaking)
o There are people in town who snoop on everyone (hypothetical).
o I need to go to the MD at the hospital to get my AIDS test results.
Do I really want the whole world to know I went to the AIDS doctor, Mike?
o That is the important PRIVACY issue.
o That is equivalent to the NNTP posting host (which is PUBLIC, Mike).
And yet, do I want the whole town to know I went to the AIDS hospital?
o That is equivalent to the NNTP server Mike
More so, do I really want my neighbor to know I went to the AIDS hospital?
o That is the equivalent of my ISP, Mike.
I hope you comprehend this extremely simple PRIVACY argument Mike.
o I constantly have to DEFEND my basic right ot PRIVACY with you Mike
Defending the basic right to privacy, Mike, would be _fine_ if you actually
UNDERSTOOD that privacy is a _chain of events_ Mike.
It's extremely sad that I have to explain PRIVACY BASICS Mike:
1. Privacy is a chain, where the most important part is the PUBLIC part
2. The rest of the chain still matters - just not as much, Mike.
> If you are 'fuzzy' in your
> 'requirements' then those who would answer are going to have a harder
> time, because then the respondent has to say IF this THEN that but if
> THAT then THIS.
Holy Shit Mike,
What you just said is exactly what Jasen, Dan, Frank, say.
o Do you realize it's not ME who is confused Mike?
I realize I hurt your feelings Mike by claiming you spew bullshit, Mike.
o I apologize if I hurt your feelings Mike
But you're STILL spewing bullshit, Mike.
o It's not ME who is confused Mike; it's you.
Why are you so extremely confused Mike?
o I already said a MILLION TIMES Mike, that it's so SIMPLE.
HINT: Let Cybe(r) Wizard count them. :)
Let me say it again, Mike:
o The IP address that is PUBLIC is what matters most Mike.
o It's a secondary consideration to have privacy at the NNTP server, Mike.
o It's a tertiary consideration ot have privacy at the ISP, Mike.
Mike, let me ask you a simple, basic, extremely easy question, Mike
o I ask this question because I seek a better solution, Mike.
Trust me, Mike, I don't make shit up, Mike.
o My credibility is stellar Mike - because I seek WORKING SOLUTIONS, Mike.
Do you have a suggested solution to _change_ the NNTP posting host?
o I can't provide a _simpler_ test case than I'm doing right now, Mike.
If you can't comprehend the _simplest_ test case, Mike...
o Then how are you going to comprehend slightly harder cases, Mike?
*I'm giving you the _simplest_ test case, Mike!*
Look at my header in _this_ post, Mike:
o The NNTP Posting host will be "78.228.100.3" from Le Landreau, France.
If you have a solution to change _that_ exact NNTP posting host
o Name just one
HINT: This is only the _simplest_ example, Mike.
o Any solution has to work with _every_ nntp server, Mike.
If a solution only works with _some_ NNTP servers, Mike
o Then that solution is utter, complete, and total bullshit, Mike.
> But, just given that your above requirement can include exposing your
> identity to the nntp provider but not exposing your connecting IP to the
> usenet masses:
Mike,
It's not ME who is confused, Mike.
o It's you.
I explained the AIDS DOCTOR example Mike:
Privacy is a chain, Mike:
o The most important piece is the PUBLIC piece
(Do I want the whole world to know I have AIDS, Mike.)
o Far less important is the SERVER piece
(Do I want the entire town to know I have AIDS, Mike.)
o Less important is the ISP piece
(Do I want my neighbor to know I have AIDS, Mike.)
Why can't you comprehend something _that_ simple, Mike?
PRIVACY is a chain, working backword in priority:
1. The public NNTP posting host header is the MOST important
2. The nntp server itself is a distant second in importance
3. The local ISP is an even further distant third in importance
Mike - this is so freaking basic that for me to have to explain the most
basic of the most basic of the most basic of the simplest of the most basic
tenets of IP privacy, is disconcerting, Mike.
Usenet is NOT the medium for me to teach you PRIVACY basics.
o You're supposed to KNOW this stuff Mike.
Every adult is supposed to know this stuff, Mike.
> - don't use an nntp provider which displays the connecting IP in the
> clear, like dotsrc/sunsite, netfront, or one which might not be hard to
> decrypt like mixmin
Mike,
Stop spewing bullshit, Mike.
o Just stop it.
You think I don't _know_ the "obfuscation" of _every_ server I use?
o Do you really think I'm _that_ stupid, Mike?
It's not me who is confused Mike.
o The obfuscation of the NNTP server is NOT the issue Mike.
Remember, you're the one "proposing" a solution to the problem.
o If your solution only works if the NNTP provider wants it to work
o Then your solution DOES NOT WORK Mike.
Grow up.
o Either you propose a solution, or you agree you don't have one.
But to propose a solution that you _think_ works, which fails the simplest
of the simplest of the simplest of simple tests, Mike, is spewing bullshit.
> - do use an nntp provider which creates a more complicated and
> variable NPH content string. I know of eternal-september and individual
> and there are likely more which DO require authentication or even payment
> - if you open the door to nntp accounts which require authentication,
> you have a lot more choices.
See above, Mike.
If you have a solution, then:
o Name just one
If you don't have a solution, then stop spewing this bullshit Mike.
o It's YOU who is confused, Mike. Not me.
Let me give you an example, although examples only go so far.
What you're telling me is akin to saying NOT to use the highway when I go
to the AIDS doctor because the highway that is free happens to have cameras
which can record my license plate of my car in the clear.
Oh, and, don't use the main street in town either, because the police man
who controls the main street intersection happens to be nosy, where he's
going to notice that I was heading to the hospital by the second best route
if I don't use the highway.
Mike,
If the only way your solution can work is to reduce the functionality that
I ALREADY have (i.e., I can use _any_ NNTP server I want to, MIke),
then you are simply spewing bullshit, Mike.
Mike,
I expect you to act like and be an adult.
Do you comprehend my argument that, privacy is a chain, Mike?
Do you comprehend that the PUBLIC link is the MOST important, Mike?
Yet, do you comprehend that ALL the links are important, Mike?
OK. Assuming you were an adult in answering that, now let's move to your
proposed solution, Mike.
What you just proposed is that I go out at night, and I don't use my car,
and that I don't use the highway, nor the main street, and THEN (and only
then) do I get the PRIVACY that I already have with VPN.
Do you realize Mike that you're spewing utter & total bullshit Mike?
Remember, I ALREADY have a perfectly working solution, Mike:
o VPN works just fine as a "glorified proxy", Mike.
It's YOU who is claiming that I should use, instead, a proxy, Mike.
o And I'm PERFECTLY HAPPY to use a proxy, Mike.
But _this_ is the simple 3-word test for bullshit, Mike.
I'd _love_ to test out your suggestion to use a proxy instead, Mike:
o *Name just one.*
> Then/And/But, if you also need to conceal your identity from the nntp
> provider, which you have previously stated that you do NOT; you have to
> devise a different strategy for that. You can assume that they ALL keep
> logs.
Mike,
I'm not afraid of logs, Mike, so stop with that right there.
o I'm NOT bearing my wife, Mike.
o I'm NOT porking little boys, Mike.
I just want something so freaking simple that you can't comprehend it.
o I simply want PRIVACY (specifically NNTP posting host privacy, Mike).
Again, _this_ is the _simplest_ WORKING example I can provide to you Mike.
1. LOOK at my NNTP posting host in the header Mike.
2. With VPN, I can _change_ that NNTP posting host to any of thousands, Mike.
3. How do I do _this_ test, using YOUR suggested "proxy" solution, Mike?
Rest assured Mike, I am of at least average intelligence (if that).
o I went to the finest schools in this country Mike - and I handled it.
o I worked for decades & retired early in Silicon Valley, Mike.
Rest assured, I've worked with truly intelligent people, Mike.
o There's _nothing_ you can post that I can't understand, Mike.
But you have to post an actual WORKING solution Mike.
o Everything else is simply utter and total complete bullshit, Mike.
In summary, I'm for WORKING solutions & I'm against total bullshit.
o I already have a working solution that uses VPN, Mike.
This whole thread has one and only one goal, Mike.
o If a proxy solution is better than VPN, I'd use it Mike.
You keep advocating a PROXY Mike - which I'd be _happy_ to test, Mike:
o *Name just one*
--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-21 09:12 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? |
| Message-ID | <gd84fbFgmneU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #54134 |
arlen holder wrote: > Mike Easter wrote: > >> Notice that you did NOT include free or any privacy consideration >> between you and the nntp admin. > > Hi Mike, > You type too much and say too little which is useful for a discussion of the issues. I have no suggestions for how you should address that affliction of yours, except that the first step is to own it - recognize that you DO it. The other problem with your messages is that they tend to be rude or offensive toward your discussant. Both of the above behaviors would tend to cause those who would potentially contribute to your conversations to kf or ignore what you post or threads which you participate. -- Mike Easter
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-21 19:34 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? |
| Message-ID | <q4mufr$g0c$1@adenine.netfront.net> |
| In reply to | #54136 |
On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 09:12:10 -0800, Mike Easter wrote: > You type too much and say too little which is useful for a discussion of > the issues. o NNTP POSTING HOST = 200.127.230.78 o LOCATION = Posadas, Misiones, Argentina o ISP = Cablevision Argentina o PROTOCOL: TCP & NNTP Mike, Adults have no problem instantly comprehending facts, Mike. o Facts are funny that way, and, o Adults are funny that way. If you have a workable solution, like "owl" proposed, I'll comprehend it. o Instantly. If you don't have a solution, Mike, & yet, if you constantly _insist_ you do ... o Then ... guess what Mike? ... It will take a forever amount of posts. Think about that obvious fact, Mike. o HINT: It's _you_ who turned a five-post thread into five hundred posts. (And you _still_ haven't passed the simple 3-word bullshit test.) --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-22 13:31 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? |
| Message-ID | <sQSbE.5$WX2.0@fx16.fr7> |
| In reply to | #54136 |
On 21/02/2019 17:12, Mike Easter wrote: > arlen holder wrote: >> Mike Easter wrote: >> >>> Notice that you did NOT include free or any privacy consideration >>> between you and the nntp admin. >> >> Hi Mike, >> > > You type too much and say too little which is useful for a discussion of > the issues. > > I have no suggestions for how you should address that affliction of > yours, except that the first step is to own it - recognize that you DO it. > > The other problem with your messages is that they tend to be rude or > offensive toward your discussant. > > Both of the above behaviors would tend to cause those who would > potentially contribute to your conversations to kf or ignore what you > post or threads which you participate. IAWTP -- David B. Devon, UK
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-21 17:32 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? |
| Message-ID | <szxcv083t.gy9o3t@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #54134 |
In alt.os.linux arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> wrote: > In summary, I'm for WORKING solutions & I'm against total bullshit. > o I already have a working solution that uses VPN, Mike. > Then use a VPN. WTF? > This whole thread has one and only one goal, Mike. > o If a proxy solution is better than VPN, I'd use it Mike. > > You keep advocating a PROXY Mike - which I'd be _happy_ to test, Mike: > o *Name just one* > You've been given instructions on how to test with socks4 proxies. Apparently, you are *not* happy to test. The following post was sent through netfront using proxychains and a sock4 proxy: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.os.linux/nW_54TSBBEE/UtRHesafBQAJ This image shows that connection: https://imgur.com/fA0VEd9
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-21 19:23 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? |
| Message-ID | <q4mtse$e0q$1@adenine.netfront.net> |
| In reply to | #54137 |
On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 17:32:08 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: > You've been given instructions on how to test with socks4 proxies. > Apparently, you are *not* happy to test. o NNTP POSTING HOST = 217.11.166.168 o LOCATION = Tbilisi, Georgia, K'alak'i T'bilisi region o ISP = Caucasus digital network Hi owl, I am an adult. o Hence, I comprehend and accept facts extremely quickly. Adults are funny that way. o Facts are funny that way. *I agree your test easily showed this nice proxychains concept works.* o We do _not_ disagree on that fact owl (adults are funny that way) In fact, I already posted that I completely accept the fact that this nice proxychain idea is a "very good idea" which almost certainly "definitely does work" for "nntp traffic" (on certain platforms). Let me be very clear, owl, since I am an adult. o I comprehend _instantly_ what your nice test example proved. Let me state that I very much _appreciate_ that you didn't bullshit, owl. o That's important - since everyone else is spewing total bullshit, owl. Clearly the _concept_ is a _great_ idea, owl. o The devil will be in the details of a working solution on all platforms -- NOTE: What _started_ this quest, was this tutorial for iOS & Android : o How to get up & running on a free public vpn service in minutes on Android or iOS <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/oOVRwpukuCE> --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-21 18:20 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? |
| Message-ID | <slrnq6tqvb.452.dan@djph.net> |
| In reply to | #54134 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 arlen holder wrote: > [...] > Look at my header in _this_ post, Mike: > o The NNTP Posting host will be "78.228.100.3" from Le Landreau, France. > > If you have a solution to change _that_ exact NNTP posting host > o Name just one Stop posting. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEBcqaUD8uEzVNxUrujhHd8xJ5ooEFAlxu6+kACgkQjhHd8xJ5 ooFJrQf9HpcnaxLtTK3VRtdI3oX0AqS9o4YZRVxUtBs5xzfJ73dqyE42YmjLR4S8 7xDo5a4KGDBjg/BOO6h2Ycf7Yw+8pozFz+iByf7Jsb0d8PL93Q9YbjxZE73IRcVZ EY7Ji4keYMuOQs+Q6vI+KH1u9ZKYCT7smusjY+saz+vkxMO2FxbwVuWXCWbb+mbw Cqj4MPUH2q6TdMj7QGqxb/RdFWVTpRiaS03OtzqfkAv6f1elTvBtcjrkiUQ1jmuc AP9+C0HikzOMphnyZcceU9y4Yuvdx6L1py/N2QVHd0PgA4FOMQ5SS8m/T1jiByu+ eyaxD4Bkr1CntKNhNHMHZOLNzVfT6A== =0pia -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- |_|O|_| |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert |O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5 4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-21 16:52 +0000 |
| Subject | PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? |
| Message-ID | <q4mkqm$2fnp$1@adenine.netfront.net> |
| In reply to | #54130 |
> HINT: I'd _love_ to use a proxy; if it worked as well as does VPN. proxychains + telnet + newsfront.net --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-21 17:06 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? |
| Message-ID | <zcv3fa03ta.th@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #54133 |
In alt.os.linux owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> HINT: I'd _love_ to use a proxy; if it worked as well as does VPN. > > proxychains + telnet + newsfront.net > > --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net --- https://imgur.com/fA0VEd9
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 7 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 … 5 6 [7] 8 9 … 13 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.os.linux
csiph-web