Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.os.linux > #53893 > unrolled thread
| Started by | arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-02-17 20:23 +0000 |
| Last post | 2019-02-19 13:22 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 251 — 28 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.os.linux
What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-17 20:23 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-17 12:46 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-17 21:44 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-17 14:29 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-17 23:15 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-18 10:49 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-18 02:21 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-18 12:13 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 15:17 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-18 09:30 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 22:22 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-18 23:33 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 23:14 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-19 00:33 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 23:41 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:22 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:00 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:06 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2019-02-18 18:39 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 22:22 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 08:41 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-18 20:32 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2019-02-18 21:38 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 22:22 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-18 23:30 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 23:18 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:18 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 22:22 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 15:17 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-18 09:31 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 22:22 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 22:28 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-18 16:55 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-18 10:18 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-18 21:24 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 22:22 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 22:22 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-18 23:47 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 23:26 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-19 00:35 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 23:40 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:21 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-02-19 21:33 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:21 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-18 15:55 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 00:15 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-19 00:36 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 00:56 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-19 03:24 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 15:07 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2019-02-19 01:39 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-19 01:51 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-19 03:25 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-19 02:36 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 15:06 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-19 16:00 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:25 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-19 18:28 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2019-02-19 19:05 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-19 11:52 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 21:13 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-19 21:33 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-19 13:43 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-19 22:00 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 22:20 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-19 22:55 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 22:10 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-19 14:24 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 23:04 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 17:20 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-19 15:23 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-19 23:25 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-20 13:23 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-20 09:15 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-20 18:41 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-20 22:59 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-20 22:11 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 15:39 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2019-02-19 23:22 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-20 13:42 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-20 12:57 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Ken Hart <kwhart1@frontier.com> - 2019-02-20 14:51 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-20 21:49 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-20 12:51 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 10:17 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Wildman <best_lay@yahoo.com> - 2019-02-19 10:32 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 00:43 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-18 16:48 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 00:54 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:50 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:52 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:25 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-19 00:27 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 00:49 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 08:58 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2019-02-18 05:31 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 15:17 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-18 09:13 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 22:43 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2019-02-18 16:50 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 23:31 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:10 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-18 12:24 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 22:52 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2019-02-18 17:02 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 23:31 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 23:08 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2019-02-18 18:01 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 00:56 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 00:56 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 15:17 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 15:38 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2019-02-18 09:59 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 16:22 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-18 16:32 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 16:38 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? shemp14@outlook.com - 2019-02-18 17:01 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2019-02-18 11:15 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2019-02-18 12:05 -0700
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-18 14:15 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2019-02-18 21:44 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2019-02-18 16:47 -0700
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 01:05 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:56 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-02-20 06:03 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2019-02-20 10:56 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2019-02-20 19:20 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-20 12:09 -0800
PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-21 15:30 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-21 09:50 -0600
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-21 07:52 -0800
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-21 16:52 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-21 09:12 -0800
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-21 19:34 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-02-22 13:31 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-21 17:32 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-21 19:23 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-21 18:20 +0000
PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-21 16:52 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-21 17:06 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-21 19:03 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-21 20:15 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-21 20:53 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-21 21:28 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-21 18:37 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-21 20:07 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-21 20:38 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2019-02-21 15:19 -0600
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2019-02-21 21:34 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2019-02-22 01:14 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-25 01:53 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-02-22 04:20 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-02-20 19:17 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2019-02-19 01:12 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-18 20:18 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 23:32 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? bje@ripco.com - 2019-02-19 11:37 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:19 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-18 20:44 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2019-02-18 13:41 -0700
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 01:10 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? bje@ripco.com - 2019-02-19 11:40 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 15:06 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:58 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 23:52 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2019-02-19 12:16 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 21:16 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-02-20 05:51 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Ken Hart <kwhart1@frontier.com> - 2019-02-18 19:18 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 01:12 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Ken Hart <kwhart1@frontier.com> - 2019-02-18 21:33 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2019-02-18 21:50 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-19 11:26 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-19 11:00 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 15:06 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-19 15:46 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-20 23:05 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-20 23:53 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-02-21 06:02 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-20 16:03 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-21 00:15 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 15:06 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 15:06 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2019-02-19 08:49 -0700
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Johnny <johnny@invalid.net> - 2019-02-19 10:01 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2019-02-19 16:45 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-20 12:05 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2019-02-21 20:59 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-21 22:36 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2019-02-22 18:29 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-22 20:03 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2019-02-22 15:42 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 15:06 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 10:01 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2019-02-19 09:06 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 15:06 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2019-02-19 11:12 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 15:07 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 10:15 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2019-02-19 12:21 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-20 12:07 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2019-02-20 10:52 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-20 23:07 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-20 17:17 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 23:16 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-20 15:38 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 00:11 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-20 16:23 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-20 16:31 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 08:54 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Lucifer <LuciferMorningstar@bigpond.com> - 2019-02-23 08:32 +1100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-22 13:52 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Ken Hart <kwhart1@frontier.com> - 2019-02-23 10:33 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-23 16:39 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 08:54 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-21 01:29 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-20 17:02 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? 123456789 <12345@12345.com> - 2019-02-20 19:36 -0700
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-21 12:17 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? 123456789 <12345@12345.com> - 2019-02-21 10:32 -0700
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2019-02-21 20:45 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-21 22:42 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-21 16:52 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-22 20:05 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-22 16:36 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-23 14:15 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-23 08:31 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-18 14:16 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 16:28 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-18 16:40 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 16:45 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Wildman <best_lay@yahoo.com> - 2019-02-18 10:10 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 16:28 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? georg.schwarz@freenet.de (Georg Schwarz) - 2019-02-18 22:35 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 00:10 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:42 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 23:55 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2019-02-18 18:04 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 01:14 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? bje@ripco.com - 2019-02-19 11:40 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 15:06 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-19 19:43 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Wildman <best_lay@yahoo.com> - 2019-02-19 15:42 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2019-02-19 19:02 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? anonymous <a@a.invalid> - 2019-02-20 00:22 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-20 00:24 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? kass <kass@kake.invalid> - 2019-02-20 00:44 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-20 00:49 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? lwo <a@a.invalid> - 2019-02-20 00:59 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-02-19 20:56 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-19 13:22 -0800
Page 6 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 13 Next page →
| From | arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-18 23:31 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q4ff7l$ror$1@news.mixmin.net> |
| In reply to | #53958 |
On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 16:50:13 -0600, Rene Lamontagne wrote: > I see it's still here. troll.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-19 09:10 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <20190219091018.032d0ff2@WizardsTower> |
| In reply to | #53956 |
On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 22:43:44 -0000 (UTC) arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> wrote: > o Allow me ot use the example of a black female MD, Mike. > > YOUR BRAIN is what's confused about the black female MD (example), > Mike. o It's not me who is confused Mike ... it's YOU who is confused. Trotting out racist examples where no racism existed before only confirms your own racism. Noted. No real surprise there, though. -- Cybe R. Wizard My other computer is a HOLMES IV with the Mycroft OS
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-18 12:24 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <gd0ikjFqtesU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #53907 |
arlen holder wrote: > Paul wrote: >> There aren't that many "account-free" newsservers. >> AIOE is one. > > > I know you to be always purposefully helpful so I will "correct" you firmly > by saying outright that there are _plenty_ of registration free nntp news > servers which allow either read and/or write privileges, sans any > registration. > o But that's not the topic of this thread. :) It is not appropriate to lump read only with posting privileges. There are a lot more read only than non-authenticated posting privileges. > HINT: Mixmin, Netfront, Mozzilla, Dizum, Aioe, Blueworld, News4All, > Albasani, Sunsite, XSUsenet, etc. (that's just offhand, from memory). Those are mostly read only. Mixmin and aioe allow posting without authentication. > The question came up because Mike advised to use a proxy instead of using a > VPN to change the IP address - No I did not. -- Mike Easter
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-18 22:52 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q4fcvm$ni9$1@news.mixmin.net> |
| In reply to | #53937 |
On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 12:24:50 -0800, Mike Easter wrote: > It is not appropriate to lump read only with posting privileges. Hi Mike, That's an ignorant claim of yours (yet another of a long series of them). I realize that explaining even my extremely _simple_ use model is like explaining to you that black female doctors exist, when your brain instinctively disallows the fact that black female doctors exist. That's simply a metaphor, like my metaphor that you're confused by VPN like a cat is confused by a toy mouse, but still the cat pounces on the toy mouse as long as it's moving, where you pounce on any thread that has the words VPN using your always-the-same innate inbred instinctive spiel. Even though my use model is so simple that it's laughable, you _still_ will _never_ comprehend it, just as a southern racist will never comprehend a black female doctor. It's not _me_ who is confused Mike. It's you. For example, do you know that I _always_ use a _different_ NNTP server for reading posts than for sending them? And, do you know that I always _read_ with a different IP address than I send? And, that each group gets a _different_ NNTP server mix? Of course you don't know this, because you can't even imagine that black female doctors can exist (figuratively speaking). Until you shake YOURSELF of your innate inbred instinct about what VPN does, you'll _never_ comprehend even the _simplest_ of use models, Mike. I'm sorry that I have to be the person to break this simple fact to you, Mike, as generally you don't post with such a series of ignorant bullshit. While it may be ridiculous to explain to you Mike, even my laughably simple use model, my main goal is privacy on the final post, but there _are_ easily added secondary goals of privacy during transit (e.g., encryption). While it's a laughably simple use model Mike, you'll _never_ comprehend it until you shake yourself of your innate inbred instinctively wrong concept of what VPN accomplishes in a simple use model involving Usenet.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-18 17:02 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <gd0rsuFsshkU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #53959 |
On 02/18/2019 4:52 PM, arlen holder wrote: > On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 12:24:50 -0800, Mike Easter wrote: > >> Chop Chop.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-18 23:31 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q4ff82$rpa$1@news.mixmin.net> |
| In reply to | #53960 |
On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 17:02:52 -0600, Rene Lamontagne wrote: > Chop Chop. troll
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-18 23:08 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q4fdsn$pbs$1@news.mixmin.net> |
| In reply to | #53937 |
On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 12:24:50 -0800, Mike Easter wrote: >> HINT: Mixmin, Netfront, Mozzilla, Dizum, Aioe, Blueworld, News4All, >> Albasani, Sunsite, XSUsenet, etc. (that's just offhand, from memory). > > Those are mostly read only. Mixmin and aioe allow posting without > authentication. Hi Mike, The simple test of an ignorant statement is 3 words: o Name just one I'm going to (yet again) prove, in ten seconds, you FAILED that test! Just like when Paul and William Unruh made completely erroneous claims out of ignorance, your statement takes ten seconds to prove it's ignorant. While it's not my goal to prove every statement from you is easily shown to be that from an ignorant person, I really WISH you would just stop proving you're ignorant of what you speak about. Of the following free NNTP servers, which are "read only", Mike? o Mixmin o Netfront o Mozilla o Dizum o Aioe o Blueworld (Jesse gave up) o News4All (likely defunct) o Albasani o Sunsite o XSUsenet (likely defunct) If we re move the defunct ones, we have about 7 in that ad hoc list. Here's the simple test of your igorant statement, Mike: You said: "Those are mostly read only". Is that right Mike? Most. Are read only, Mike? Really? Are you sure, Mike? Or is that yet another of your spewing of ignorant bullshit, Mike? Name just one of those 7 free NNTP servers which is "read only". o Name just one. Now, maybe you meant that they don't allow posting sans authorization, which, as you know, is _trivial_ to obtain, so, even then, I know exactly which of those in the list require authorization to POST. Do you? Since you said MOST, and since there are 7 in that ad hoc list that are likely not currently defunct, most would be, oh, about four of them, right Mike? Well, guess what, as usual in this thread, you're DEAD WRONG again, Mike. o I'm not trying to prove you wrong Mike (Since it's trivial to prove you wrong - it's child's play, Mike.) *I'm just trying to ask you to STOP SPEWING IGNORANT BULLSHIT MIKE* You and Paul and William Unruh are, essentially, spewing ignorant bullshit because you can't fathom any good reason that a black female MD should exist (figuratively speaking). It's YOUR BRAIN which is fucked up Mike - not mine. Here's my simple proof that you spew completely ignorant bullshit, Mike: o Name those four. Yup. Name those four. HINT: You can't even get close to four! Name the "most" of the following free NNTP servers that requires authorization in order to post. o Mixmin o Netfront o Mozilla o Dizum o Aioe o Albasani o Sunsite Mike: My point isn't to prove you wrong, simply because it's literally child's play to prove all your statements completely ignorant bullshit. My intent is to ask you PLEASE STOP SPEWING IGNORANT BULLSHIT. You can't even pass the simplest of ignorance tests, Mike. o Name just one of those 7 that doesn't allow posting, and, o Name the four of those 7 that requires authentication to post. HINT: You fail. I hate proving you spew ignorant bullshit because it's so easy to do. Please Mike: Stop spewing your completely ignorant bullshit. The least you can do is spew bullshit that doesn't take fewer than 10 seconds to PROVE it's ignorant bullshit for Christs' sake, Mike.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-18 18:01 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <gd0vaaFtj42U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #53961 |
On 02/18/2019 5:08 PM, arlen holder wrote: > On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 12:24:50 -0800, Mike Easter wrote: > chop chop.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-19 00:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q4fk88$47c$1@news.mixmin.net> |
| In reply to | #53976 |
On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 18:01:12 -0600, Rene Lamontagne wrote: > chop chop. Troll.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-19 00:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q4fk8b$47c$3@news.mixmin.net> |
| In reply to | #53937 |
On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 12:24:50 -0800, Mike Easter wrote: >> The question came up because Mike advised to use a proxy instead of using a >> VPN to change the IP address - > > No I did not. EVERY ONE OF YOUR CLAIMS HAS BEEN COMPLETELY UNSUPPORTED BY FACT: Here's the simple test, Mike: o Name just one That is, name just one statement in my summary of that article, Mike, that is a "misunderstanding" of that article, Mike? o Name just one. Here is the cite to the summary, Mike: <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.android/Bv8bwG4ggnc/oAPYdk4QEgAJ> You see Mike, I'm not afraid of the "name just one" test, Mike. o You have FAILED this "name just one" test a few times already, Mike. Find a misunderstanding in that summary of the article Mike. o Name just one.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-18 15:17 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q4eib5$7o0$4@news.mixmin.net> |
| In reply to | #53901 |
On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 10:49:42 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote:
> There is an nntp proxy, I use one - but it sits in my very own computer.
> It is called leafnode - seek it up in the wikipedia. It is not used for
> anonymity: its original creation purpose was for use with dial up modems.
All I want, Carlos, is what I get with VPN, Carlos, but where I _accept_
that I'm using VPN as a "glorified proxy".
I just want to change my IP address at will, Carlos.
o Does this "leafnode" allow many different free IP address proxying?
Let me look it up.
<http://leafnode.org/doc_en/leafnode.8.html>
It's an NNTP server.
o Offhand, I don't think that will work, but let's delve deeper to see...
Maybe there is a clever way to use "leafnode" to change the IP address?
> A user would connect the modem and fire up the "fetch news cycle":
> leafnode collects all new messages on the groups it follows (not all
> groups). Then the modem would disconnect. The user or users would read
> the posts, write answers using any normal nntp client software, which
> for all purposes would think they were connected to a normal nntp server
> on Internet. Finally, the machine would fire up the modem and send all
> pending nntp posts in a few seconds of connection.
Hi Carlos,
I'm _only_ about _actionable_ solutions (i.e., real solutions).
o And, in general, I'm about _general_ purpose solutions.
(That is, solutions that work for everyone; not just for me.)
I like this leafnode idea, which I am unfamiliar with ... at the moment.
This "leafnode" might actually be useful - in a "modem" sort of way.
o Replace the word "modem" with "vpn" to get the idea...
I guess "one way" leafnode would work would be that we do this:
1. We connect to free public VPN of our choice
(a proxy would be better - but it has to exist!)
2. We use leafnode to connect to a free public nntp server of our choice
(we use leafnode to pull down all the traffic & disconnect from VPN)
3. We then use leafnode again to connect to the free public VPN.
(and we send all the articles that we composed offline)
In short, leafnode _can_ be used in a model where we replace the word
"modem" with the word "vpn", as a sort of workaround to the problems
inherent in using the free public vpn services.
However, that really only _minimizes_ the issue with VPN which is just as
easily minimized by simply doing what I do today anyway using the scripts
that were initially written by Marek Novotny years ago for this purpose.
1. I connect to a VPN (which takes a single command)
2. I pull down all the Usenet traffic from any desired set of nntp servers
3. I disconnect from VPN
At my leisure, like I am at this very moment, I compose my responses
(my "Usenet reader" is "vi" as it's just a bunch of editing scripts).
Then I connect momentarily to VPN to "send" my responses (where Marek and
others helped me write the daily wget ^ geolocate scripts that have
garnered about six or seven thousand different currently active IP
addresses which I randomly choose among with a randomizer script) as
needed.
In effect, Carlos, I like the leafnode use model so much that I'm _already_
using that leafnode use model, if I understand it correctly.
I'm just using "vpn" instead of "modem" & "vi" instead of "leafnode".
> This would happen daily, hourly, or any period the admin would define
> with cron. This was/is on Linux, maybe there were other tools for Windows.
The platform doesn't matter as long as it works on _both_ which is how all
my scripts are, which, essentially, are simple calls to "vi" & "telnet".
> The current advantage now that dial up modems are not used is that the
> clients read posts much faster. It also allows automatic connection to
> several upstream nntp servers: if one doesn't work, it goes to another.
If I had known about "leafnode" long ago, I likely would have explored it
as the use model seems similar to what I'm using now with "vi" & "telnet".
PULL:
1. Connect to any one of thousands of VPN IP addresses
2. Download Usenet messages using "telnet"
3. Disconnect from VPN...
....
Then, offline, compose responses in "vi" (or "vim" on Windows, to be clear)
....
PUSH:
A. Connect to VPN...
B. Upload Usenet messages using "telnet"
C. Disconnect from VPN...
That's my current use model, where "leafnode" would have fit.
But at this point in time, "leafnode" would simply be redundant.
This question is about a "proxy" instead of "vpn".
> I can also search for a text on a group or bunch of groups, because the
> "server" is in my machine and I have access to its files.
I generally search for "text" on a group using "grep" or "findstr".
I can also use the Usenet shortcuts I personally created years ago:
http://tinyurl.com/alt-os-linux
http://tinyurl.com/alt-comp-os-windows-10
http://tinyurl.com/comp-sys-mac-apps
etc.
>> Knowledgeable users who know the answer can add to our knowledge.
>
> I hate your mania of saying that phrase.
Hi Carlos,
The _reason_ I tried to put off all the bullshit answers is that keywords
are involved.
I know Usenet as well as you do Carlos - where the keyword trolls
have a field day EVERY time certain keywords are mentioned.
o Mike Easter is normally an ok guy - but he's a keyword troll whenever the
keyword of "VPN" is involved.
He says the _same_ thing EVERY time the word "VPN" is involved.
o I could be asking how to _spell_ VPN, and he's _still_ say the same thing
Hence, the _reason_ I came down strong in the OP & on Mike is simple
o I'm trying to NOT waste everyone's time on these idiotic keyword trolls!
The keyword trolls don't even _read_ the question!
o They respond _only_ to the keyword.
And, they _always_ say the same idiotic things to those keywords.
o I am simply trying to _avoid_ the keyword trolls, Carlos.
You know me well, and you know that I'm about ACTIONABLE answers.
I'm not on usenet to waste my time (or yours) on keyword bullshit.
Many people on Usenet are "keyworded" bullshitters, Carlos - you know that.
The mere mention of a "keyword" brings out their trolls.
o They _always_ respond the _same_ to certain keywords!
o They don't add _any_ value because all they do is respond to keywords
o I could be asking how to _spell_ VPN, and they'd still respond the same.
Mike did that.
o In general Mike isn't a keyword troll
o But in this case, Mike fell into the _classic_ keyword troll trap.
In the "olden" days, the keyword trolls responded differently:
o Every time they saw "vpn", they'd respond to "roll your own".
Nowadays, the keyword trolls respond differently:
o Every time they see "vpn" they say it's not safe.
Mike, who generally is NOT a keyword troll, has interacted with me on this
VPN issue over the past year or two, and EVERY time Mike throws out his
keyword bullshit of the "its not safe".
OK. It's not safe. I get it.
o But that doesn't change the fact it's useful.
So Mike then throws out an article that says "use a proxy instead".
o But that article is bullshit - because there is no proxy.
Or is there?
o That's the reason for _this_ question, Carlos.
Is there a free proxy that works with free Usenet servers?
It's a simple question, Carlos - but I'll bet I'll waste my time on it.
o I'll bet _everyone_ will waste their time.
You know why, Carlos?
o Very few people are NOT keyword bullshitters, Carlos.
And...
o There may be no known proxies that can work with nntp servers Carlos.
In summary...
1. The question is easy to comprehend & difficult to answer.
2. The reason is that the answer may be that a proxy doesn't exist.
3. Very few (if any) of us, know the answer (not me either).
Everything else except the answer (or workaround) ... is a waste of time.
>> Q: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts?
> I don't have the foggiest idea what an nntp proxy would be in your
> context, what would it be useful for.
Hi Carlos,
It's not an "nntp proxy"; it's a proxy ... that works with nntp servers.
(HINT: Most proxies are "web" proxies which are useless for nntp traffic.)
The question came up when Mike posted an article that said that people use
VPN as a glorified proxy when they shouldn't use VPN as a glorified proxy.
Specifically the article stated that people should use proxies.
All I'm trying to do is _follow_ that advice for NNTP traffic.
Remember Carlos, we all know _most_ (all?) proxies work with HTTP traffic.
o They abound in the hundreds, Carlos (everyone knows that).
This isn't about proxies that work with HTTP traffic, Carlos.
o This is about proxies which work with Usenet posts.
Specifically, this single simple question:
Q: Is there a free proxy that works with nntp servers?
> An nntp proxy would just be an nntp server that forwards to another nntp
> server - which by definition converts it into another nntp server, not a
> proxy. It would not necessarily anonymize the user.
That's not the question, Carlos, but thanks for taking a stab at it.
Remember, the article Mike posted says use a proxy instead of VPN
if all you want to do is change the IP address (e.g., change the country).
OK.
What free proxy works with free NNTP server traffic?
Q1: What free proxy works with Paolo Amoroso's free nntp server?
Q2: What free proxy works with Wolfgang Weyland's free nntp service?
Q3: What free proxy works with Steve Crook's free nntp server.
Q4: What free proxy works with Alex de Joode's free nntp server setup?
Q5: What free proxy works with Roman Racine's free nntp setup?
Q6: What free proxy would have worked with Jesse Rehmer' free nntp server?
Q7: What free proxy works with Steen Jensen's free nntp service?
Q8: What proxy works with Daniel & Monika Weber & Benjamin Gufler's server?
If the answer to any of those questions is that it doesn't exist,
o Then the article that Mike posted is sheer and utter bullshit.
You can _tell_ people to use a proxy
o But if the proxy doesn't work
o Then the article is advocating sheer & utter bullshit
To be clear, my intent is NOT to prove the article is bullshit
o Sure, I _think_ the article is bullshit, but that's not my intent
My intent is to _find_ a free proxy that works with those free nntp servers.
o The keyword trolls are having a field day with this _simple_ question.
In summary, these are the answers to your questions:
1. I wrote the OP to ask a simple question about proxies
2. We all know about proxies that work with HTTP but what about NNTP?
3. I know that keyword trolls abound - so I tried to STOP them proactively
Keyword trolls respond the _same_ every single time to a given keyword
o Unfortunately, for example, Mike _always_ responds the same to "VPN".
o Why?
o I don't know why. Ask him why.
o All I know is that he _always_ responds the same to the VPN keyword.
As for leafnode, it's _not_ a proxy, but it's a "nice idea".
o In fact, had I known about it years ago, I might have used it.
But my use model is, essentially, similar in action to what leafnode does
a. I connect to any of thousands of IP addresses (as a VPN but for a proxy)
b. I pull or push Usenet message
c. I then disconnect from the VPN (which I'm using like a proxy).
Hence, the only question asked in this thread is this simple question:
o What free proxy works with the various free nntp servers?
--
NOTE: I don't fear a question that has no answers; it would then be easy to
manage as it would have no responses to deal with that are off topic.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-18 15:38 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q4ejho$a1u$1@news.mixmin.net> |
| In reply to | #53910 |
On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 15:17:58 -0000 (UTC), arlen holder wrote: > In effect, Carlos, I like the leafnode use model so much that I'm _already_ > using that leafnode use model, if I understand it correctly. > > I'm just using "vpn" instead of "modem" & "vi" instead of "leafnode". Correction FROM: "I'm just using "vpn" instead of "modem" & "vi" instead of "leafnode" Correction TO: I'm just using "vpn" instead of "modem" & "_telnet_" instead of "leafnode". Here is a summary of what this thread asks: Q: Is there a free proxy that works with free nntp servers, or not? Here's a summary of what this thread does NOT ask: Q: Is it true what Paul & Mike opined that nobody has any right to privacy? Or, more to the point of their veiled accusation: Q: Is it true that everyone who wants privacy wants it for nefarious purposes? Here's a summary of WHY this thread even exists? 1. I posted a purposefully helpful post of HOW to set up a free VPN. 2. Mike responded with a keyword-troll response 3. Mike's keyword-troll response is, essentially, "vpn sucks - use a proxy". 4. In addition, Mike essentially made the "right to privacy" claims above. Here's my RESPONSE to Mikes' keyword troll on "VPN"... A. I would be HAPPY to use a PROXY instead of a VPN! B. But that proxy has to _exist_ first. C. If that proxy does not exist, then Mike's advice is total ignorant bullshit. Worse, here is my RESPONSE to MIke's privacy rant: A. Mike essentially makes the claim that I have to DEFEND my right to privacy. B. I respond, strongly, with cites, that this is a common ignorant statement. C. When I ask Mike to provide cites backing up his ignorant claim, he can't. Let's state the super obvious things here: 1. Nobody has to defend their right to privacy. 2. If you (Paul or Mike) want to claim otherwise, then back it up with cites. 3. Rest assured, I already provided Mike with cites proving my point of view. That's because my point of view on privacy is what INTELLIGENT people say. o If you disagree, then I'll provide cites to back up that claim o Expect me to ask YOU to provide cites that back up YOUR claims. This thread is NOT about privacy. o the only reason privacy comes up is the igorance of keyword trolls EVERY TIME VPN comes up (or a proxy), they act like a cat with a laser beam o The keyword trolls POUNCE on that laser beam moving across the carpet Nothing matters to that cat other than the laser beam is MOVING!!!!!! o That's what the keyword trolls are doing here o They are POUNCING on the word "VPN" with their pre-prepared spiel Stop it. Just stop. o If you don't know the answer to the question, just don't answer it. I strongly suspect the proxy advice was sheer & utter ignorant bullshit anyway. In short, the question is trivially simple to comprehend: A. The suggestion is to use a proxy instead of VPN as a "glorified proxy". B. I'd be HAPPY to use that suggestion - but a proxy has to exist. Does it? NOTE: If the proxy doesn't exist, then the suggestion is ignorant bullshit. And I really hate ignorant bullshit because I'm a man of action.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-18 09:59 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <gd033qFnbe1U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #53911 |
On 02/18/2019 9:38 AM, arlen holder wrote: > On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 15:17:58 -0000 (UTC), arlen holder wrote: > >> In effect, Carlos, I like the leafnode use model so much that I'm _already_ >> using that leafnode use model, if I understand it correctly. >> >> I'm just using "vpn" instead of "modem" & "vi" instead of "leafnode". > > Correction FROM: > "I'm just using "vpn" instead of "modem" & "vi" instead of "leafnode" > Correction TO: > I'm just using "vpn" instead of "modem" & "_telnet_" instead of "leafnode". > > Here is a summary of what this thread asks: > Q: Is there a free proxy that works with free nntp servers, or not? > > Here's a summary of what this thread does NOT ask: > Q: Is it true what Paul & Mike opined that nobody has any right to privacy? > Or, more to the point of their veiled accusation: > Q: Is it true that everyone who wants privacy wants it for nefarious purposes? > > Here's a summary of WHY this thread even exists? > 1. I posted a purposefully helpful post of HOW to set up a free VPN. > 2. Mike responded with a keyword-troll response > 3. Mike's keyword-troll response is, essentially, "vpn sucks - use a proxy". > 4. In addition, Mike essentially made the "right to privacy" claims above. > > Here's my RESPONSE to Mikes' keyword troll on "VPN"... > A. I would be HAPPY to use a PROXY instead of a VPN! > B. But that proxy has to _exist_ first. > C. If that proxy does not exist, then Mike's advice is total ignorant bullshit. > > Worse, here is my RESPONSE to MIke's privacy rant: > A. Mike essentially makes the claim that I have to DEFEND my right to privacy. > B. I respond, strongly, with cites, that this is a common ignorant statement. > C. When I ask Mike to provide cites backing up his ignorant claim, he can't. > > Let's state the super obvious things here: > 1. Nobody has to defend their right to privacy. > 2. If you (Paul or Mike) want to claim otherwise, then back it up with cites. > 3. Rest assured, I already provided Mike with cites proving my point of view. > > That's because my point of view on privacy is what INTELLIGENT people say. > o If you disagree, then I'll provide cites to back up that claim > o Expect me to ask YOU to provide cites that back up YOUR claims. > > This thread is NOT about privacy. > o the only reason privacy comes up is the igorance of keyword trolls > > EVERY TIME VPN comes up (or a proxy), they act like a cat with a laser beam > o The keyword trolls POUNCE on that laser beam moving across the carpet > > Nothing matters to that cat other than the laser beam is MOVING!!!!!! > o That's what the keyword trolls are doing here > o They are POUNCING on the word "VPN" with their pre-prepared spiel > > Stop it. Just stop. > o If you don't know the answer to the question, just don't answer it. > > I strongly suspect the proxy advice was sheer & utter ignorant bullshit anyway. > > In short, the question is trivially simple to comprehend: > A. The suggestion is to use a proxy instead of VPN as a "glorified proxy". > B. I'd be HAPPY to use that suggestion - but a proxy has to exist. > > Does it? > > NOTE: If the proxy doesn't exist, then the suggestion is ignorant bullshit. > And I really hate ignorant bullshit because I'm a man of action. > What the hell are cites?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-18 16:22 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q4em3s$ei1$1@news.mixmin.net> |
| In reply to | #53912 |
On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 09:59:51 -0600, Rene Lamontagne wrote: > What the hell are cites? Hi Rene Lamontagne, The extremely simple question asked in this thread is... *Q: Is there a free proxy that works with Usenet?* The answer to your separate question is in this thread cited below: <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.android/Bv8bwG4ggnc/N7knLiUdEgAJ> Mike made a claim out of ignorance, where I simply asked Mike to back up his claim with respectable cites that support his particularly ignorant point of view. Since Mike's claim is a very common ignorant claim, it took me all of ten seconds to find respectable sites from which I provided Mike with cites. Mike has _still_ not responded to the simple 3 word question I always use to point out that people make claims based out of sheer & total ignorance: o Name just one In my case, to support my point of view that nobody has to defend their right to privacy, I easily provided Mike with cites to sites that back up my claim that the right to privacy does NOT need to be defended. Using that Google web site, I will quote the cites as shown below: Do you want _more_ cites from me proving your statement reeks of ignorance? Here's a Guardian article explaining why your statement reeks of ignorance: <https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/video/2015/may/22/edward-snowden-rights-to-privacy-video> Here's a Wikipedia page outlining YOUR blatant ignorant statement: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nothing_to_hide_argument> Here's what the Democratic Underground said about your ignorant statement: <https://www.democraticunderground.com/10028166414> Here's a Business Insider page outlining YOUR blatantly ignorant statement: <https://www.businessinsider.com/edward-snowden-privacy-argument-2016-9> Here's a RightsAndDissent treatise explaining your ignorant statement: <https://rightsanddissent.org/news/privacy-fountainhead-rights-ed-snowden-says-need-protect/> Here's what the Wall Street Journal says about your igorant statement: <https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/edward-snowden-after-months-of-nsa-revelations-says-his-missions-accomplished/2013/12/23/49fc36de-6c1c-11e3-a523-fe73f0ff6b8d_story.html> o In one quote, Snowden just destroyed the biggest myth about privacy <https://mic.com/articles/119602/in-one-quote-edward-snowden-summed-up-why-our-privacy-is-worth-fighting-for#.ZH66T6m4O> etc Notice I cite a bunch of sites which support my point of view, Rene. Paul and Mike essentially seem to be keywording on VPN, where they make veiled accusations as to WHY everyone wants PRIVACY. The intelligent point these cited articles make is that the person taking away your right to privacy has the burden of proof to prove why they feel you have absolutely no right to privacy. It's not the other way around. Mike Easter thinks this is a relatively minor difference in "point of view". If it is, and, if Mike is an adult, then he should be able to cite at least a reasonable set of sites that support his "point of view". My position is that this is not a "minor" difference in POV. My position is that Mike's claims are CLASSIC of complete & utter ignorance. My simple 3-word test of complete & total ignorance is thus: o Name just one Since I easily named a half dozen sites with cites that support my POV, I simply asked Mike to provide a cite that supports his point of view. In fact, I asked Mike to support his POV using this simple 3-word test asking for him to find a single well-respected site that supports his POV. I asked Mike: o Name just one. The fact that Mike (did NOT, could not, will not) "Name Just One" supports my point of view that Mike was advocating complete and utterly ignorant total bullshit. If I'm not clear enough, Rene, let me know. HINT: Site is used here as a web site. DOUBLEHINT: Cite is used here as a URL to an article on that web site. In summary, the question is: *Q: Is there a free proxy that works with Usenet?* If the answer is yes, I'll test it out for the team; and report back. Everyone benefits from the addition of value to our tribal knowledge. If no, then Mike's advice was, indeed, complete & total bullshit. If it's merely philosophical, it's not actionable in this context. *Q: Is there a free proxy that works with Usenet?*
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-18 16:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnq6lng9.4gc.dan@xps-linux.djph.net> |
| In reply to | #53912 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Rene Lamontagne wrote: > [...] > What the hell are cites? Given the (redacted) context, I imagine we are in for a post implying that you (and possibly Mike Easter) are too much of a "left side DK scale(tm)" type to properly divine that he did indeed mean 'citations', rather than any chance that arlen is simply poor at distinguishing between homonyms. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEBcqaUD8uEzVNxUrujhHd8xJ5ooEFAlxq3gkACgkQjhHd8xJ5 ooEiZAf+MuVCvcCzdJNfLoLlwUfOKm4JfY7WGfmj64Ae2vs+4pNK+UC7aTCTDELt 1HLA1j/7TxB82U/Ur26klR+Qw8O3bEXq/Tc7EJNCdPC2UrPmC7vlYAIq+TYdjOI2 FfMzktsb0vthAj51PWA0OkrpWHu5w+Kn/RN/gwBDTqxVUxpVv5XXnsNMOTIw/+8K W8zJ+pA7hAnvsQa7/kW2q7FRW3Tp3rcPGv8HhEmS1DqVuGZ9pSt7pN+u3Xkcg5At TwYKKzz8RfuOCgRndRFgYLv6ENLJc0EobCH/jCpCfsRXIvcdGFzTMp+HBzX/RzqI Z4xI1oLmdekAYtVLCgAQ84RYrBpUuA== =jwW9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- |_|O|_| |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert |O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5 4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-18 16:38 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q4en1i$g8d$1@news.mixmin.net> |
| In reply to | #53917 |
On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 16:32:09 -0000 (UTC), Dan Purgert wrote: > Given the (redacted) context, I imagine we are in for a post implying > that you (and possibly Mike Easter) are too much of a "left side DK > scale(tm)" type to properly divine that he did indeed mean 'citations', > rather than any chance that arlen is simply poor at distinguishing > between homonyms. Troll.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | shemp14@outlook.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-18 17:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <Iu-dnesXGIJSeffBnZ2dnUU7-UHNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #53912 |
On 18-Feb-2019, Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> wrote: > > Worse, here is my RESPONSE to MIke's privacy rant: > > A. Mike essentially makes the claim that I have to DEFEND my right to > > privacy. > > B. I respond, strongly, with cites, that this is a common ignorant > > statement. > > C. When I ask Mike to provide cites backing up his ignorant claim, he > > can't. > > > > Let's state the super obvious things here: > > 1. Nobody has to defend their right to privacy. > > 2. If you (Paul or Mike) want to claim otherwise, then back it up with > > cites. > > 3. Rest assured, I already provided Mike with cites proving my point of > > view. > What the hell are cites? References.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-18 11:15 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <gd07hgFoetbU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #53922 |
On 02/18/2019 11:01 AM, shemp14@outlook.com wrote: > > On 18-Feb-2019, Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> wrote: > >>> Worse, here is my RESPONSE to MIke's privacy rant: >>> A. Mike essentially makes the claim that I have to DEFEND my right to >>> privacy. >>> B. I respond, strongly, with cites, that this is a common ignorant >>> statement. >>> C. When I ask Mike to provide cites backing up his ignorant claim, he >>> can't. >>> > > >>> Let's state the super obvious things here: >>> 1. Nobody has to defend their right to privacy. >>> 2. If you (Paul or Mike) want to claim otherwise, then back it up with >>> cites. >>> 3. Rest assured, I already provided Mike with cites proving my point of >>> view. > > >> What the hell are cites? > > References. > Thanks, I was mistaking it for sites. Rene
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-18 12:05 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <l50m6elstrrk5llkj4vi93bg1n6la3h14r@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #53924 |
On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 11:15:26 -0600, Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> wrote: >On 02/18/2019 11:01 AM, shemp14@outlook.com wrote: >> >> On 18-Feb-2019, Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> wrote: >> >>>> Worse, here is my RESPONSE to MIke's privacy rant: >>>> A. Mike essentially makes the claim that I have to DEFEND my right to >>>> privacy. >>>> B. I respond, strongly, with cites, that this is a common ignorant >>>> statement. >>>> C. When I ask Mike to provide cites backing up his ignorant claim, he >>>> can't. >>>> >> >> >>>> Let's state the super obvious things here: >>>> 1. Nobody has to defend their right to privacy. >>>> 2. If you (Paul or Mike) want to claim otherwise, then back it up with >>>> cites. >>>> 3. Rest assured, I already provided Mike with cites proving my point of >>>> view. >> >> >>> What the hell are cites? >> >> References. >> > >Thanks, I was mistaking it for sites. As far as I'm concerned, you are right, and the original post with the word "cites" is wrong. "Cite" is a verb, not a noun. The noun is "citation." I'm sure I'm going to get arguments about this, telling me I'm an old fuddy-duddy and I'm behind the times. So I'll repeat my first five words in the paragraph above: "as far as I'm concerned."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-18 14:15 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <180220191415221752%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| In reply to | #53931 |
In article <l50m6elstrrk5llkj4vi93bg1n6la3h14r@4ax.com>, Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> wrote: > >> > >>> What the hell are cites? > >> > >> References. > > > >Thanks, I was mistaking it for sites. > > As far as I'm concerned, you are right, and the original post with the > word "cites" is wrong. "Cite" is a verb, not a noun. The noun is > "citation." it's both. as a noun, it's short for citation. <https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/cite> <https://www.thefreedictionary.com/cite> > I'm sure I'm going to get arguments about this, telling me I'm an old > fuddy-duddy and I'm behind the times. So I'll repeat my first five > words in the paragraph above: "as far as I'm concerned." whatever you want to call it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 13 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.os.linux
csiph-web