Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.os.linux > #51809 > unrolled thread

opinions about Fedora Silverblue

Started bySoviet_Mario <SovietMario@CCCP.MIR>
First post2018-11-30 20:17 +0100
Last post2018-11-30 17:08 -0800
Articles 4 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to alt.os.linux


Contents

  opinions about Fedora Silverblue Soviet_Mario <SovietMario@CCCP.MIR> - 2018-11-30 20:17 +0100
    Re: opinions about Fedora Silverblue Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2018-11-30 11:42 -0800
      Re: opinions about Fedora Silverblue Soviet_Mario <SovietMario@CCCP.MIR> - 2018-12-01 00:29 +0100
      Re: opinions about Fedora Silverblue Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2018-11-30 17:08 -0800

#51809 — opinions about Fedora Silverblue

FromSoviet_Mario <SovietMario@CCCP.MIR>
Date2018-11-30 20:17 +0100
Subjectopinions about Fedora Silverblue
Message-ID<pts2bp$qfj$1@dont-email.me>
I'm reading this page

https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora-silverblue/

I miss many things likely.
For example I seem to understand that every package is 
deployed as FLATPACK ... Is that true ?

But what is exactly rpm-ostree ?

It says : <<Fedora Silverblue is an immutable desktop 
operating system. Aiming at good support for 
container-focused workflows, this variant of Fedora 
Workstation targets developer communities.>>

  container-focused workflows does not make any sense to me. 
What does this mean ? It's a different way of saying they 
use flatpack ?

-- 
1) Resistere, resistere, resistere.
2) Se tutti pagano le tasse, le tasse le pagano tutti
Soviet_Mario - (aka Gatto_Vizzato)

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#51810

FromMike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid>
Date2018-11-30 11:42 -0800
Message-ID<g6di64Fe1adU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#51809
Soviet_Mario wrote:
> I'm reading this page
> 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora-silverblue/
> 
> I miss many things likely.
> For example I seem to understand that every package is deployed as 
> FLATPACK ... Is that true ?
> 
> But what is exactly rpm-ostree ?
> 
> It says : <<Fedora Silverblue is an immutable desktop operating system. 
> Aiming at good support for container-focused workflows, this variant of 
> Fedora Workstation targets developer communities.>>
> 
>   container-focused workflows does not make any sense to me. What does 
> this mean ? It's a different way of saying they use flatpack ?

I like to read something else than your link about Fedora 29 vs Fed29 
SilverBlue.

A couple of weeks ago DW DistroWatch pub'd a couple of feature articles, 
one by Joshua Holm on 'regular' Fed29 and one by Robert Rijkhoff on 
Fed29 SilverBlue

https://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20181112#fedora
https://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20181112#silverblue

That gives me a much better idea.  My general past experience with using 
Fedora live is that it is a little rough around the edges.

Dedoimedo Igor Ljubuncic has done a couple of review on Fed28's Gnome & 
KDE this year.  He wasn't so happy either, but he is frequently grumpy 
in his reviews.

-- 
Mike Easter

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#51811

FromSoviet_Mario <SovietMario@CCCP.MIR>
Date2018-12-01 00:29 +0100
Message-ID<ptsh5b$m8f$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#51810
On 30/11/18 20:42, Mike Easter wrote:
> Soviet_Mario wrote:
>> I'm reading this page
>>
>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora-silverblue/
>>
>> I miss many things likely.
>> For example I seem to understand that every package is 
>> deployed as FLATPACK ... Is that true ?
>>
>> But what is exactly rpm-ostree ?
>>
>> It says : <<Fedora Silverblue is an immutable desktop 
>> operating system. Aiming at good support for 
>> container-focused workflows, this variant of Fedora 
>> Workstation targets developer communities.>>
>>
>>   container-focused workflows does not make any sense to 
>> me. What does this mean ? It's a different way of saying 
>> they use flatpack ?
> 
> I like to read something else than your link about Fedora 29 
> vs Fed29 SilverBlue.
> 
> A couple of weeks ago DW DistroWatch pub'd a couple of 
> feature articles, one by Joshua Holm on 'regular' Fed29 and 
> one by Robert Rijkhoff on Fed29 SilverBlue
> 
> https://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20181112#fedora
> https://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20181112#silverblue
> 
> That gives me a much better idea.  My general past 
> experience with using Fedora live is that it is a little 
> rough around the edges.

I started at distrowatch actually, but I missed the articles 
you linked.
After reading the docs, I got to think that SilverBlue might 
be too unfamiliar to me (and I have the tendency to mess up 
things).
It sounded very nice but actually I read only Fedora sources :\
TY

> 
> Dedoimedo Igor Ljubuncic has done a couple of review on 
> Fed28's Gnome & KDE this year.  He wasn't so happy either, 
> but he is frequently grumpy in his reviews.
> 


-- 
1) Resistere, resistere, resistere.
2) Se tutti pagano le tasse, le tasse le pagano tutti
Soviet_Mario - (aka Gatto_Vizzato)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#51812

FromMike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid>
Date2018-11-30 17:08 -0800
Message-ID<g6e588Fi1svU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#51810
Mike Easter wrote:
> My general past experience with using Fedora live is that it is a little 
> rough around the edges.

I torrented a Fed29 Cinnamon workstation live and booted it.  I believe 
I like the Cinnamon v. the best of the ones I've tried so far.

There's a nice bunch of Fed torrents here https://torrent.fedoraproject.org/

-- 
Mike Easter

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | alt.os.linux


csiph-web