Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.os.linux > #56901 > unrolled thread

Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug

Started by"anonymous" <anonymous@rip.ax.lt>
First post2019-06-16 07:53 -0500
Last post2019-06-25 15:11 +0200
Articles 20 on this page of 244 — 42 participants

Back to article view | Back to alt.os.linux

Contents

  Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "anonymous" <anonymous@rip.ax.lt> - 2019-06-16 07:53 -0500
    Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Anonymous" <nobody@mixmin.net> - 2019-06-16 07:56 -0500
    Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Fenris <fenris@invalid.invalid> - 2019-06-16 15:53 +0200
      Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2019-06-16 15:35 +0100
        Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2019-06-16 15:30 +0000
        Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2019-06-16 16:53 -0400
      Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "School of Agriculture" <ag@hick.edu> - 2019-06-17 14:35 -0500
        Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2019-06-17 20:42 +0100
          Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2019-06-17 17:31 -0400
        Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2019-06-17 20:30 +0000
          Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-19 10:12 +0200
        Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2019-06-17 20:30 +0000
        Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Anonymous" <nobody@mixmin.net> - 2019-06-18 07:04 -0500
          Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Fenris <fenris@invalid.invalid> - 2019-06-18 14:18 +0200
            Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2019-06-18 14:17 +0100
              Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-06-18 08:52 -0500
                Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-06-20 05:57 +0000
                  Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2019-06-20 07:05 -0500
                    Using 'sed' to delete a line from a file (Was: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2019-06-20 12:32 +0000
                      Re: Using 'sed' to delete a line from a file (Was: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug) Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2019-06-20 12:17 -0600
                    Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Anonymous" <anon@anon.com> - 2019-06-20 08:31 -0500
                    Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Anonymous" <anon@anon.com> - 2019-06-20 08:33 -0500
                    Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Anonymous" <anon@anon.com> - 2019-06-20 08:42 -0500
    Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-06-16 11:57 -0500
      Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2019-06-16 21:28 +0200
        How come we're not talking about (Was: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2019-06-16 20:12 +0000
          Re: How come we're not talking about (Was: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug) "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2019-06-17 06:52 +0200
        Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-06-21 13:24 -0500
    Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2019-06-16 11:12 -0600
    Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2019-06-16 13:26 -0700
      Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-06-16 13:34 -0700
        Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-19 10:20 +0200
          Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Georges <georges@prout.com> - 2019-06-19 10:55 +0200
            Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-19 12:37 +0200
              Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Georges <georges@prout.com> - 2019-06-19 13:13 +0200
                Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-20 14:31 +0200
                  Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug ruben safir <ruben@mrbrklyn.com> - 2019-07-20 19:43 -0400
              Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2019-06-19 09:36 -0600
                Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-20 14:36 +0200
              Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug ruben safir <ruben@mrbrklyn.com> - 2019-07-20 19:37 -0400
            Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> - 2019-06-19 21:32 +0300
              Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Georges <georges@prout.com> - 2019-06-19 20:47 +0200
                Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-19 21:01 +0200
                  Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2019-06-19 20:23 +0100
                    Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-19 22:53 +0200
                      Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-06-19 23:09 +0000
                        Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Georges <georges@prout.com> - 2019-06-20 05:21 +0200
                          Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-06-20 04:16 +0000
                            Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Georges <georges@prout.com> - 2019-06-20 06:21 +0200
                        Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-20 14:38 +0200
                          Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-06-20 13:30 +0000
                            Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-20 19:21 +0200
                              Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-06-20 18:39 +0000
                                Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-20 22:52 +0200
                                  Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-06-20 23:48 +0000
                                    Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-21 13:01 +0200
                                      Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-06-21 12:30 +0000
                                        Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-21 14:51 +0200
                                          Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-06-21 13:43 +0000
                                            Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-23 12:56 +0200
                                          Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2019-06-21 08:55 -0500
                                            Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-21 19:01 +0200
                                        Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "F. Russell" <frussell@random.info> - 2019-06-21 13:33 +0000
                                          Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-06-21 13:39 +0000
                                            Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2019-06-21 10:14 -0500
                                              Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-21 19:09 +0200
                                              Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2019-06-21 13:39 -0400
                                          Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-21 19:07 +0200
                                            Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "F. Russell" <frussell@random.info> - 2019-06-21 17:19 +0000
                                              Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-21 19:57 +0200
                                                Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2019-06-21 23:14 +0000
                                                  Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Lucifer <LuciferMorningstar@bigpond.com> - 2019-06-23 19:00 +1000
                                            Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2019-06-22 00:17 +0000
                                              Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-06-22 02:08 -0400
                                                Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-23 12:59 +0200
                                      Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2019-06-21 11:18 -0400
                                        Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-21 19:10 +0200
                                          Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-06-21 19:57 +0000
                                            Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-21 23:09 +0200
                      Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2019-06-21 08:17 +0100
                        Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-21 13:03 +0200
                  Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-06-19 19:51 +0000
                    Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-19 22:45 +0200
                  Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug ruben safir <ruben@mrbrklyn.com> - 2019-07-20 19:46 -0400
              Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-19 21:00 +0200
                Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2019-06-19 20:20 +0100
                  Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-20 14:43 +0200
              Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2019-06-19 16:44 -0400
                Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-19 22:57 +0200
                  Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Wildman <best_lay@yahoo.com> - 2019-06-19 16:17 -0500
                    Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2019-06-19 17:43 -0400
                      Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-20 00:58 +0200
                  Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2019-06-19 17:40 -0400
                  Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Georges <georges@prout.com> - 2019-06-19 23:53 +0200
          Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug ruben safir <ruben@mrbrklyn.com> - 2019-07-20 19:31 -0400
    Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Freenet" <pieer@free.fr> - 2019-06-16 20:44 -0500
      Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-06-17 12:41 +0000
        Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2019-06-17 17:30 -0400
          Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-18 11:29 +0200
            Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2019-06-18 16:15 -0400
              Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-06-18 20:28 +0000
                Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2019-06-18 17:27 -0400
                  Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-06-19 00:04 +0000
                    Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2019-06-18 22:36 -0400
                      Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-19 10:06 +0200
                        Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2019-06-19 16:15 -0400
                          Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-20 14:51 +0200
                            Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be> - 2019-06-20 15:13 +0200
                              Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-20 19:14 +0200
                                Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2019-06-20 12:21 -0600
                                  Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2019-06-21 00:56 +0000
                            Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2019-06-20 16:07 -0400
                              Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2019-06-20 14:24 -0600
                                Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2019-06-20 16:51 -0400
                                Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-20 23:02 +0200
                                  Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2019-06-20 15:14 -0600
                                    Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-21 13:41 +0200
                                      Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-06-21 09:30 -0500
                                        Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-21 19:14 +0200
                                      Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2019-06-21 12:34 -0600
                                        Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-21 23:53 +0200
                              Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-20 22:55 +0200
                                Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2019-06-20 15:17 -0600
                                  Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-21 14:03 +0200
                                    Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2019-06-21 22:59 -0600
                                      Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2019-06-22 07:51 -0500
                                        Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2019-06-22 16:53 -0600
                                          Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2019-06-22 18:56 -0500
                                            Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2019-06-22 20:09 -0600
                                              Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2019-06-22 22:48 -0500
                                                Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2019-06-22 22:51 -0600
                                                  Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-23 13:19 +0200
                                                    Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2019-06-23 07:33 -0500
                                                      Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2019-06-23 15:07 +0100
                                                      Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-24 02:09 +0200
                                                        Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2019-06-23 22:22 -0500
                                                          Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-24 11:41 +0200
                                                            Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2019-06-24 07:24 -0500
                                      Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-23 13:14 +0200
                                        Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2019-06-23 11:50 -0600
                                          Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-24 02:41 +0200
                                            Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2019-06-30 15:08 -0600
                                              Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2019-06-30 21:14 +0000
                                                Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2019-06-30 15:22 -0600
                                                  Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2019-06-30 21:47 +0000
                                                  Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-07-01 08:10 +0000
                                                    Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2019-07-01 10:05 +0100
                                                    Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-07-01 12:54 +0200
                                                      Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2019-07-01 12:08 +0100
                                                        Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-07-01 11:54 +0000
                                                          Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2019-07-01 12:30 -0400
                                                            Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2019-07-01 17:11 -0600
                                                      Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2019-07-01 17:06 -0600
                                                        Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-07-02 09:35 +0000
                                                          Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2019-07-02 09:20 -0600
                                                        Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-07-02 14:28 +0200
                                              Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-07-01 07:51 +0000
                                              Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-07-01 12:46 +0200
                                                Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2019-07-01 09:50 -0500
                                                  Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-07-01 17:31 +0200
                                                    Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2019-07-01 12:10 -0500
                                                      Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-07-02 14:17 +0200
                                                        Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2019-07-02 10:22 -0500
                                                          Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-07-02 19:10 +0200
                                                            Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-07-02 19:16 +0200
                                                              Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2019-07-02 12:27 -0600
                                                              Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2019-07-02 14:33 -0500
                                                                Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-07-03 13:34 +0200
                                                                  Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2019-07-03 09:06 -0500
                                                                    Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2019-07-04 03:14 +0100
                                                                    Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug - spam on mail "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-07-04 15:26 +0200
                                                Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2019-07-01 17:16 -0600
                                                  Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-07-02 14:20 +0200
                                        Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2019-06-23 16:36 -0400
                                          Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-24 03:37 +0200
                                            Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2019-06-24 13:50 -0400
                                              Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-24 23:14 +0200
                                  Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2019-06-21 16:01 -0400
                                    Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-21 23:57 +0200
                                      Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2019-06-21 17:35 -0500
                                        Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-06-21 22:04 -0500
                                          Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2019-06-22 12:57 -0400
                                      Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-06-21 21:58 -0500
                                        Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2019-06-22 07:32 -0500
                                      Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2019-06-21 23:10 -0600
                                        Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2019-06-22 08:21 +0100
                                        Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2019-06-22 13:01 -0400
                                          Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2019-06-22 16:55 -0600
                                            Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2019-06-22 18:47 -0500
                                              Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2019-06-22 20:15 -0600
                                        Ancient networking [Was: Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug] "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-23 13:52 +0200
                                          Re: Ancient networking [Was: Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug] John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2019-06-23 10:02 -0500
                                            Re: Ancient networking [Was: Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug] "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-24 02:17 +0200
                                              Re: Ancient networking [Was: Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug] John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2019-06-23 22:30 -0500
                                          Re: Ancient networking [Was: Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug] Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2019-06-23 11:56 -0600
                                            Re: Ancient networking [Was: Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug] Sidney_Kotic <kant@have.it> - 2019-06-23 10:11 -0800
                                            Re: Ancient networking [Was: Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug] "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-24 03:23 +0200
                                              Re: Ancient networking [Was: Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug] Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-06-24 09:07 +0000
                                                Re: Ancient networking [Was: Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug] "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-24 11:52 +0200
                                                  Re: Ancient networking [Was: Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug] Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2019-06-24 14:14 -0400
                                                    Re: Ancient networking [Was: Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug] "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-24 23:21 +0200
                                              Re: Ancient networking [Was: Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug] Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2019-06-30 15:38 -0600
                                          Re: Ancient networking [Was: Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug] Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2019-06-30 15:31 -0600
                                        Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2019-06-30 09:17 -0400
                                          Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2019-06-30 15:41 -0600
                                    Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2019-06-21 23:02 -0600
                                      Fidonet [Was: Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug] "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-23 14:02 +0200
                                        Re: Fidonet [Was: Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug] Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-06-24 09:11 +0000
                                          Re: Fidonet [Was: Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug] "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-24 11:53 +0200
                                        Re: Fidonet [Was: Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug] Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2019-06-25 07:37 +0200
                                          Re: Fidonet [Was: Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug] "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-25 16:49 +0200
                                            Re: Fidonet [Was: Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug] The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2019-06-25 19:34 +0100
                                          Re: Fidonet [Was: Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug] Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2019-06-30 09:36 -0400
                                    Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2019-06-30 08:52 -0400
                            Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2019-06-30 08:25 -0400
                              Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-30 20:01 +0200
                                Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2019-06-30 20:57 +0100
                                Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2019-06-30 15:47 -0600
                              Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Jean-David Beyer <jeandavid8@verizon.net> - 2019-06-30 16:13 -0400
              Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-19 00:43 +0200
          Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-19 10:28 +0200
            Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2019-06-19 10:30 +0000
              Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-19 12:51 +0200
                Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2019-06-19 11:30 +0000
                  Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-19 21:03 +0200
                Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-06-19 12:30 +0000
                  Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-19 21:11 +0200
                    Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-06-19 20:10 +0000
                      Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Georges <georges@prout.com> - 2019-06-19 22:18 +0200
                        Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-06-19 20:33 +0000
                      Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-19 23:05 +0200
                        Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-06-19 23:30 +0000
                          Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2019-06-19 21:43 -0600
                            Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Georges <georges@prout.com> - 2019-06-20 05:50 +0200
                          Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-20 23:20 +0200
                      Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2019-06-19 21:45 -0400
                        Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-06-20 03:23 +0000
                        Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2019-06-19 21:45 -0600
                  Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-20 23:15 +0200
                Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2019-06-30 09:54 -0400
                  Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-06-30 20:06 +0200
              Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org - 2019-06-19 11:55 +0000
                Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org - 2019-06-22 13:20 +0000
    Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2019-06-25 15:11 +0200

Page 4 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 13  Next page →

#57068

FromJohn Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com>
Date2019-06-21 08:55 -0500
Message-ID<87fto3rqk8.fsf@dhh.gt.org>
In reply to#57064
Carlos writes:
> So, the full functionality is not accesable via menus...

So you really want to use Emacs.

Using any really powerful program entirely through menus is impractical,
though.  I use both Emacs and Vim.  I rarely touch the menus in Emacs
and I've never used Vim in anything but Vi mode (Vi being the first
screen editor I learned).
-- 
John Hasler 
jhasler@newsguy.com
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI USA

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#57072

From"Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid>
Date2019-06-21 19:01 +0200
Message-ID<34fvtf-haa.ln1@Telcontar.valinor>
In reply to#57068
On 21/06/2019 15.55, John Hasler wrote:
> Carlos writes:
>> So, the full functionality is not accesable via menus...
> 
> So you really want to use Emacs.
> 
> Using any really powerful program entirely through menus is impractical,
> though.  I use both Emacs and Vim.  I rarely touch the menus in Emacs
> and I've never used Vim in anything but Vi mode (Vi being the first
> screen editor I learned).

I know that it is impractical, but that is the way I learn the keyboard
interface of any editor. When I have to use Emacs, I start with the
menu, then whatever is frequent I use directly. The menu says the shortcut.

If gvim has some functionality not accessible from the menu, then it is
not useful to me. Wrong approach to me.


-- 
Cheers, Carlos.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#57065

From"F. Russell" <frussell@random.info>
Date2019-06-21 13:33 +0000
Message-ID<qeimar07hk@news2.newsguy.com>
In reply to#57063
On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 12:30:03 +0000, owl vomited this verbiage that I
considered to be worthy of my attention for one of a variety of possible
reasons:

> 
> WYSIWYG has nothing to do with command-set exposure.  It has to do
> with the document.  And if any text editor can be considered WYSIWYG,
> then vim can be also.
>

You are conflating two entirely different things.  A text editor is
nowhere near to being a WYSIWYG editor.

A text editor does exactly, and only, what the term implies: edit text.
That is, a text editor manipulates only bytes that are interpreted as representing
text characters.  (And no, XML and HTML are NOT considered text files.)

A WYSIWYG editor, or word processor, manipulates much information that does
NOT represent characters, such as formatting, typeface, margins, line spacing,
positioning, etc.  The resulting file is essentially binary in nature.

A text editor can do a minimal kind of WYSIWYG but only through the judicious
use of spacing and tab characters.  There is nothing in the resulting file
that is not pure text.

A text editor cannot do boldface, underlining, italics, etc. and if it does
then it is no longer to be classified as a text editor.

By the way, the absolute best text editor for GNU/Linux is cooledit.
Pound for pound, cooledit will blow anything else out of the water --
and this is true in spite of its relatively antiquated nature and
lack of maintenance.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#57066

Fromowl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Date2019-06-21 13:39 +0000
Message-ID<sauzx0b083.a@rooftop.invalid>
In reply to#57065
In comp.os.linux.misc F. Russell <frussell@random.info> wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 12:30:03 +0000, owl vomited this verbiage that I
> considered to be worthy of my attention for one of a variety of possible
> reasons:
> 
>> 
>> WYSIWYG has nothing to do with command-set exposure.  It has to do
>> with the document.  And if any text editor can be considered WYSIWYG,
>> then vim can be also.
>>
> 
> You are conflating two entirely different things.  A text editor is
> nowhere near to being a WYSIWYG editor.
> 

No, I'm not doing that.  I said if *any* text editor can be considered
WYSIWYG (and I did not bring in that term with respect to text editors),
then vim can.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#57071

FromJohn Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com>
Date2019-06-21 10:14 -0500
Message-ID<87blyrrmvt.fsf@dhh.gt.org>
In reply to#57066
F. Russell writes:
> You are conflating two entirely different things.  A text editor is
> nowhere near to being a WYSIWYG editor.

WYSIWYG -> What You See Is What You Get.  With Vim or Emacs what you see
on the screen is what you will get when you print the file.  Thus they
are WYSIWYG.  What you mean is that they are not GUI editors because not
everything you can do with them is accessible via menus.

By that argument no editor is GUI, because the insert character command
requires the use of the keyboard.
-- 
John Hasler 
jhasler@newsguy.com
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI USA

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#57074

From"Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid>
Date2019-06-21 19:09 +0200
Message-ID<mifvtf-eqa.ln1@Telcontar.valinor>
In reply to#57071
On 21/06/2019 17.14, John Hasler wrote:
> F. Russell writes:
>> You are conflating two entirely different things.  A text editor is
>> nowhere near to being a WYSIWYG editor.
> 
> WYSIWYG -> What You See Is What You Get.  With Vim or Emacs what you see
> on the screen is what you will get when you print the file.  Thus they
> are WYSIWYG.  What you mean is that they are not GUI editors because not
> everything you can do with them is accessible via menus.
> 
> By that argument no editor is GUI, because the insert character command
> requires the use of the keyboard.

Doesn't count, same as the cursor keys do not count.


-- 
Cheers, Carlos.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#57078

FromDan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com>
Date2019-06-21 13:39 -0400
Message-ID<qej4oa$q6u$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#57071
John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> writes:

> F. Russell writes:
>> You are conflating two entirely different things.  A text editor is
>> nowhere near to being a WYSIWYG editor.
>
> WYSIWYG -> What You See Is What You Get.  With Vim or Emacs what you see
> on the screen is what you will get when you print the file.  Thus they
> are WYSIWYG.  What you mean is that they are not GUI editors because not
> everything you can do with them is accessible via menus.

I don't know if the current Emacs menus provide access to everything,
but since the Emacs menus are user configurable, they certainly could.

> By that argument no editor is GUI, because the insert character command
> requires the use of the keyboard.

Not sure about vi/gvim, but Emacs allows for multiple fonts and images
in it's buffers.  You can most certainly display web pages in it's
buffers.

The line between text editor and WYSIWYG isn't easy to draw.


-- 
Dan Espen

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#57073

From"Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid>
Date2019-06-21 19:07 +0200
Message-ID<rffvtf-eqa.ln1@Telcontar.valinor>
In reply to#57065
On 21/06/2019 15.33, F. Russell wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 12:30:03 +0000, owl vomited this verbiage that I
> considered to be worthy of my attention for one of a variety of possible
> reasons:
> 
>>
>> WYSIWYG has nothing to do with command-set exposure.  It has to do
>> with the document.  And if any text editor can be considered WYSIWYG,
>> then vim can be also.
>>
> 
> You are conflating two entirely different things.  A text editor is
> nowhere near to being a WYSIWYG editor.
> 
> A text editor does exactly, and only, what the term implies: edit text.
> That is, a text editor manipulates only bytes that are interpreted as representing
> text characters.  (And no, XML and HTML are NOT considered text files.)
> 
> A WYSIWYG editor, or word processor, manipulates much information that does
> NOT represent characters, such as formatting, typeface, margins, line spacing,
> positioning, etc.  The resulting file is essentially binary in nature.

Correct.

> 
> A text editor can do a minimal kind of WYSIWYG but only through the judicious
> use of spacing and tab characters.  There is nothing in the resulting file
> that is not pure text.
> 
> A text editor cannot do boldface, underlining, italics, etc. and if it does
> then it is no longer to be classified as a text editor.

Well, it can, in the sense that the text console can do both bold and
underlining. Even the original monochrome of the IBM PC could :-)

But it can not express that in the pure text, it has to use some kind of
hidden text that says "this is bold", and enters the realm of text
processors.

> 
> By the way, the absolute best text editor for GNU/Linux is cooledit.
> Pound for pound, cooledit will blow anything else out of the water --
> and this is true in spite of its relatively antiquated nature and
> lack of maintenance.
> 

I don't know it. openSUSE doesn't have it. Wikipedia says it "is a
digital audio workstation from Adobe Systems"

-- 
Cheers, Carlos.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#57077

From"F. Russell" <frussell@random.info>
Date2019-06-21 17:19 +0000
Message-ID<qej3jv02huh@news1.newsguy.com>
In reply to#57073
On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 19:07:39 +0200, Carlos E.R. vomited this verbiage that
I considered to be worthy of my attention for one of a variety of possible
reasons:

> 
> I don't know it. openSUSE doesn't have it. Wikipedia says it "is a
> digital audio workstation from Adobe Systems"
>

https://rpmfind.net/linux/RPM/mageia/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/cooledit-3.17.17-15.mga7.x86_64.html


Original source (needs patching):

ftp://ftp.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/apps/editors/X/cooledit/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#57079

From"Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid>
Date2019-06-21 19:57 +0200
Message-ID<rcivtf-r1d.ln1@Telcontar.valinor>
In reply to#57077
On 21/06/2019 19.19, F. Russell wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 19:07:39 +0200, Carlos E.R. vomited this verbiage that
> I considered to be worthy of my attention for one of a variety of possible
> reasons:
> 
>>
>> I don't know it. openSUSE doesn't have it. Wikipedia says it "is a
>> digital audio workstation from Adobe Systems"
>>
> 
> https://rpmfind.net/linux/RPM/mageia/cauldron/x86_64/media/core/release/cooledit-3.17.17-15.mga7.x86_64.html

Hum. Packages from different distributions can cause problems.


> Original source (needs patching):
> 
> ftp://ftp.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/apps/editors/X/cooledit/


Well... it seems it is not an editor I can consider easily.


-- 
Cheers, Carlos.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#57097

From"F. Russell" <fr@random.info>
Date2019-06-21 23:14 +0000
Message-ID<qejoc00odt@news2.newsguy.com>
In reply to#57079
On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 19:57:15 +0200, Carlos E.R. wrote:

>> 
>> ftp://ftp.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/apps/editors/X/cooledit/
> 
> Well... it seems it is not an editor I can consider easily.
>

Here is a link to a patched source:

https://ufile.io/bpf7bgtt

The patches are applied but also given in the /patch directory.

Just compile as usual:

./configure  (check options with ./configure --help)

make

make install-strip

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#57161

FromLucifer <LuciferMorningstar@bigpond.com>
Date2019-06-23 19:00 +1000
Message-ID<8tfugels5ehf4vrcb2cek1uq8ah5n6cjnj@4ax.com>
In reply to#57097
On 21 Jun 2019 23:14:08 GMT, "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> wrote:

>On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 19:57:15 +0200, Carlos E.R. wrote:
>
>>> 
>>> ftp://ftp.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/apps/editors/X/cooledit/
>> 
>> Well... it seems it is not an editor I can consider easily.
>>
>
>Here is a link to a patched source:
>
>https://ufile.io/bpf7bgtt
>
>The patches are applied but also given in the /patch directory.
>
>Just compile as usual:
>
>./configure  (check options with ./configure --help)
>
>make
>
>make install-strip

Use vi.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#57098

FromRonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com>
Date2019-06-22 00:17 +0000
Message-ID<qejs2d$ksd$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#57073
On 2019-06-21, Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
> On 21/06/2019 15.33, F. Russell wrote:
>
>> 
>> By the way, the absolute best text editor for GNU/Linux is cooledit.
>> Pound for pound, cooledit will blow anything else out of the water --
>> and this is true in spite of its relatively antiquated nature and
>> lack of maintenance.
>> 
>
> I don't know it. openSUSE doesn't have it. Wikipedia says it "is a
> digital audio workstation from Adobe Systems"

Not available in Ubuntu's repository either, though it looks like it's 
downloadable from sourceforge.

http://freshmeat.sourceforge.net/projects/cooledit

It doesn't appear to have the WordStar keystrokes, so it's useless to me. :)

I'll keep using Jstar in the terminal.

-- 
The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#57105

From"David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org>
Date2019-06-22 02:08 -0400
Message-ID<op.z3rvcf2ha3w0dxdave@hodgins.homeip.net>
In reply to#57098
On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 20:17:18 -0400, RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 2019-06-21, Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
>> On 21/06/2019 15.33, F. Russell wrote:
>>> By the way, the absolute best text editor for GNU/Linux is cooledit.
>>> Pound for pound, cooledit will blow anything else out of the water --
>>> and this is true in spite of its relatively antiquated nature and
>>> lack of maintenance.

>> I don't know it. openSUSE doesn't have it. Wikipedia says it "is a
>> digital audio workstation from Adobe Systems"
> Not available in Ubuntu's repository either, though it looks like it's
> downloadable from sourceforge.

It's available in Mageia. It comes from
ftp://ftp.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/apps/editors/X/cooledit/

My preference is mcedit from the mc (midnight commander) package for
use in a terminal or run level 3. Similar to the old dos norton commander.
For gui, I usually use leafpad.

Regards, Dave Hodgins

-- 
Change dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org to davidwhodgins@teksavvy.com for
email replies.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#57164

From"Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid>
Date2019-06-23 12:59 +0200
Message-ID<gn94d6F8hl7U2@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#57105
On 22/06/2019 08.08, David W. Hodgins wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 20:17:18 -0400, RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 2019-06-21, Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
>>> On 21/06/2019 15.33, F. Russell wrote:
>>>> By the way, the absolute best text editor for GNU/Linux is cooledit.
>>>> Pound for pound, cooledit will blow anything else out of the water --
>>>> and this is true in spite of its relatively antiquated nature and
>>>> lack of maintenance.
> 
>>> I don't know it. openSUSE doesn't have it. Wikipedia says it "is a
>>> digital audio workstation from Adobe Systems"
>> Not available in Ubuntu's repository either, though it looks like it's
>> downloadable from sourceforge.
> 
> It's available in Mageia. It comes from
> ftp://ftp.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/apps/editors/X/cooledit/
> 
> My preference is mcedit from the mc (midnight commander) package for
> use in a terminal or run level 3. Similar to the old dos norton commander.
> For gui, I usually use leafpad.

Same here :-)

Sometimes I use joe, sometimes mcedit.

(By the way, both have syntax highlighting)

And other times, leafpad.


One fault with jstar, is that it errors on ctrl-cursor.


-- 
Cheers,
       Carlos E.R.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#57070

FromDan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com>
Date2019-06-21 11:18 -0400
Message-ID<qeisfg$9js$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#57059
"Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> writes:

> Ah, and there is no one I know capable of writing in columns, except
> word processors.

Emacs users know, whenever anyone says an editor can't do something,
a little Google searching always proves the claim wrong:

https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/Two_002dColumn.html

:)

-- 
Dan Espen

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#57075

From"Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid>
Date2019-06-21 19:10 +0200
Message-ID<3mfvtf-eqa.ln1@Telcontar.valinor>
In reply to#57070
On 21/06/2019 17.18, Dan Espen wrote:
> "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> writes:
> 
>> Ah, and there is no one I know capable of writing in columns, except
>> word processors.
> 
> Emacs users know, whenever anyone says an editor can't do something,
> a little Google searching always proves the claim wrong:
> 
> https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/Two_002dColumn.html
> 
> :)
> 

So there is one :-)

-- 
Cheers, Carlos.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#57087

Fromowl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Date2019-06-21 19:57 +0000
Message-ID<cvz89834ag.ahuo343@rooftop.invalid>
In reply to#57075
In comp.os.linux.misc Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
> On 21/06/2019 17.18, Dan Espen wrote:
>> "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> writes:
>> 
>>> Ah, and there is no one I know capable of writing in columns, except
>>> word processors.
>> 
>> Emacs users know, whenever anyone says an editor can't do something,
>> a little Google searching always proves the claim wrong:
>> 
>> https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/Two_002dColumn.html
>> 
>> :)
>> 
> 
> So there is one :-)
> 

https://streamable.com/e21kh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#57090

From"Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid>
Date2019-06-21 23:09 +0200
Message-ID<jltvtf-8rl.ln1@Telcontar.valinor>
In reply to#57087
On 21/06/2019 21.57, owl wrote:
> In comp.os.linux.misc Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
>> On 21/06/2019 17.18, Dan Espen wrote:
>>> "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> writes:
>>>
>>>> Ah, and there is no one I know capable of writing in columns, except
>>>> word processors.
>>>
>>> Emacs users know, whenever anyone says an editor can't do something,
>>> a little Google searching always proves the claim wrong:
>>>
>>> https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/Two_002dColumn.html
>>>
>>> :)
>>>
>>
>> So there is one :-)
>>
> 
> https://streamable.com/e21kh

More or less :-)

-- 
Cheers, Carlos.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#57057

FromThe Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Date2019-06-21 08:17 +0100
Message-ID<qei0al$kca$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#57006
On 19/06/2019 21:53, Carlos E.R. wrote:
> On 19/06/2019 21.23, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>> On 19/06/2019 20:01, Carlos E.R. wrote:
>>> On 19/06/2019 20.47, Georges wrote:
>>>> Le 19/06/2019 à 20:32, Tauno Voipio a écrit :
>>>>> On 19.6.19 11:55, Georges wrote:
>>>>>> Le 19/06/2019 à 10:20, Carlos E.R. a écrit :
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>>>>> if you teach students, you struggle between time and contents (what
>>>>>> you
>>>>>> can teach on a 20h course for instance), so 'vi' is a good choice
>>>>>> because it's widely used... and simple... once you get the
>>>>>> philosophy ;)
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If you really want to go backward in time, you should use ed, and no
>>>>> newer derivatives like ex and vi with family.
>>>>>
>>>>> My favourite in primitive editors is nano.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Try this with nano... ;)
>>>>
>>>> Let's consider a file with 2 columns (or more of course), separated with
>>>> <space> or <tab> or whatever you want, you need to invert columns :
>>>>
>>>> aaaaa bbbbb
>>>> aaaaa bbbbb
>>>>
>>>> :1,$s/^\(.*\) \(.*\)$/\2 \1/
>>>>
>>>> bbbbb aaaaa
>>>> bbbbb aaaaa
>>>>
>>>> ;)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Jstar (joe) can do that.  Switch to vertical block mode, select the
>>> rectangle on the left, move to the right.
>>>
>> in a Wysiwyg I just highlight the text and move it
> 
> I don't know any such editor that can do that in Linux. Of course, I
> have not tried all in existence.
> 
> I can not just highlight all the 'b's. As I try, the 'a's in the
> previous line gets highlighted. No vertical block mode.

I did it in geany easily

Obviously it has to be done one line at a time

Geny dioes regexp as well


> 
>>
>>
>> TBH when messing around with seriously complex tect manipluations I have
>> been known to use grep , vi, and geany all on the same file.
>>
>> Geany slows down on hundred megabyte files. Vi doesnt seem to
> 
> I have edited large files on jstar, too. I don't remember the size. Some
> editors need to map the entire file in memory, but 100 MB of ram is
> doable nowdays. Yesteryear it had to be done on the file almost
> directly, in chunks or whatever.
> 
> Oh, yes, I remember the size. I have edited this file:
> 
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 54M Apr  8 05:33 /var/lib/pin/ARCHIVES.gz
> 
> when expanded. It has 5268107 lines, but I'm not going to expand it now
> to see the size
> 
> 


-- 
"The great thing about Glasgow is that if there's a nuclear attack it'll 
look exactly the same afterwards."

Billy Connolly

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 4 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 13  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | alt.os.linux

csiph-web