Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.os.linux > #53893 > unrolled thread
| Started by | arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-02-17 20:23 +0000 |
| Last post | 2019-02-19 13:22 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 251 — 28 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.os.linux
What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-17 20:23 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-17 12:46 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-17 21:44 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-17 14:29 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-17 23:15 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-18 10:49 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-18 02:21 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-18 12:13 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 15:17 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-18 09:30 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 22:22 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-18 23:33 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 23:14 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-19 00:33 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 23:41 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:22 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:00 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:06 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2019-02-18 18:39 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 22:22 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 08:41 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-18 20:32 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2019-02-18 21:38 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 22:22 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-18 23:30 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 23:18 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:18 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 22:22 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 15:17 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-18 09:31 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 22:22 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 22:28 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-18 16:55 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-18 10:18 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-18 21:24 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 22:22 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 22:22 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-18 23:47 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 23:26 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-19 00:35 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 23:40 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:21 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-02-19 21:33 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:21 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-18 15:55 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 00:15 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-19 00:36 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 00:56 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-19 03:24 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 15:07 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2019-02-19 01:39 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-19 01:51 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-19 03:25 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-19 02:36 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 15:06 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-19 16:00 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:25 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-19 18:28 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2019-02-19 19:05 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-19 11:52 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 21:13 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-19 21:33 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-19 13:43 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-19 22:00 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 22:20 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-19 22:55 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 22:10 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-19 14:24 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 23:04 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 17:20 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-19 15:23 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-19 23:25 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-20 13:23 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-20 09:15 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-20 18:41 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-20 22:59 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-20 22:11 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 15:39 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2019-02-19 23:22 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-20 13:42 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-20 12:57 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Ken Hart <kwhart1@frontier.com> - 2019-02-20 14:51 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-20 21:49 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-20 12:51 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 10:17 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Wildman <best_lay@yahoo.com> - 2019-02-19 10:32 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 00:43 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-18 16:48 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 00:54 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:50 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:52 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:25 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-19 00:27 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 00:49 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 08:58 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2019-02-18 05:31 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 15:17 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-18 09:13 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 22:43 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2019-02-18 16:50 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 23:31 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:10 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-18 12:24 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 22:52 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2019-02-18 17:02 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 23:31 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 23:08 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2019-02-18 18:01 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 00:56 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 00:56 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 15:17 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 15:38 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2019-02-18 09:59 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 16:22 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-18 16:32 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 16:38 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? shemp14@outlook.com - 2019-02-18 17:01 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2019-02-18 11:15 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2019-02-18 12:05 -0700
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-18 14:15 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2019-02-18 21:44 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2019-02-18 16:47 -0700
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 01:05 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:56 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-02-20 06:03 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2019-02-20 10:56 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2019-02-20 19:20 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-20 12:09 -0800
PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-21 15:30 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-21 09:50 -0600
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-21 07:52 -0800
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-21 16:52 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-21 09:12 -0800
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-21 19:34 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-02-22 13:31 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-21 17:32 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-21 19:23 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-21 18:20 +0000
PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-21 16:52 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-21 17:06 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-21 19:03 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-21 20:15 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-21 20:53 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-21 21:28 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-21 18:37 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-21 20:07 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-21 20:38 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2019-02-21 15:19 -0600
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2019-02-21 21:34 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2019-02-22 01:14 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-25 01:53 +0000
Re: PRIVACY Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-02-22 04:20 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-02-20 19:17 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2019-02-19 01:12 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-18 20:18 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 23:32 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? bje@ripco.com - 2019-02-19 11:37 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:19 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-18 20:44 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2019-02-18 13:41 -0700
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 01:10 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? bje@ripco.com - 2019-02-19 11:40 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 15:06 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:58 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 23:52 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2019-02-19 12:16 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 21:16 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-02-20 05:51 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Ken Hart <kwhart1@frontier.com> - 2019-02-18 19:18 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 01:12 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Ken Hart <kwhart1@frontier.com> - 2019-02-18 21:33 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2019-02-18 21:50 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-19 11:26 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-19 11:00 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 15:06 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-19 15:46 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-20 23:05 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-20 23:53 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-02-21 06:02 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-20 16:03 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-21 00:15 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 15:06 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 15:06 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2019-02-19 08:49 -0700
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Johnny <johnny@invalid.net> - 2019-02-19 10:01 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2019-02-19 16:45 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-20 12:05 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2019-02-21 20:59 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-21 22:36 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2019-02-22 18:29 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-22 20:03 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2019-02-22 15:42 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 15:06 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 10:01 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2019-02-19 09:06 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 15:06 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2019-02-19 11:12 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 15:07 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 10:15 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2019-02-19 12:21 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-20 12:07 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2019-02-20 10:52 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-20 23:07 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-20 17:17 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 23:16 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-20 15:38 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 00:11 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-20 16:23 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-20 16:31 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 08:54 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Lucifer <LuciferMorningstar@bigpond.com> - 2019-02-23 08:32 +1100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-22 13:52 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Ken Hart <kwhart1@frontier.com> - 2019-02-23 10:33 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-23 16:39 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? David in Devon <BDonTJ@REMOVE.gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 08:54 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-21 01:29 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-20 17:02 -0800
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? 123456789 <12345@12345.com> - 2019-02-20 19:36 -0700
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-21 12:17 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? 123456789 <12345@12345.com> - 2019-02-21 10:32 -0700
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2019-02-21 20:45 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-21 22:42 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-21 16:52 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-22 20:05 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-22 16:36 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-02-23 14:15 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-23 08:31 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-18 14:16 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 16:28 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-18 16:40 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 16:45 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Wildman <best_lay@yahoo.com> - 2019-02-18 10:10 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 16:28 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? georg.schwarz@freenet.de (Georg Schwarz) - 2019-02-18 22:35 +0100
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 00:10 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-02-19 09:42 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-18 23:55 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2019-02-18 18:04 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 01:14 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? bje@ripco.com - 2019-02-19 11:40 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-02-19 15:06 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-19 19:43 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Wildman <best_lay@yahoo.com> - 2019-02-19 15:42 -0600
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2019-02-19 19:02 -0500
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? anonymous <a@a.invalid> - 2019-02-20 00:22 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-20 00:24 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? kass <kass@kake.invalid> - 2019-02-20 00:44 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-02-20 00:49 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? lwo <a@a.invalid> - 2019-02-20 00:59 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-02-19 20:56 +0000
Re: What's a free proxy for the specific purpose of free Usenet posts? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2019-02-19 13:22 -0800
Page 3 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 13 Next page →
| From | arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-18 23:40 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q4ffpk$ssd$1@news.mixmin.net> |
| In reply to | #53969 |
On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 00:35:20 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote: > Ok, I stop reading, as you resort to insulting... Carlos, You make a baseless claim, and then you HIDE behind it o You don't defend your baseless claim, since you can't. It's no different than saying I beat my wife. And then when I respond that yours is a baseless claim o You hide behind the fact that I called your bluff. THIS IS A FACT CARLOS: o You made a baseless claim (multiple times). o And then you hide behind it. It's no different from me asking you... *When are you going to stop beating your wife, Carlos?*
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-19 09:21 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <20190219092149.25f439ff@WizardsTower> |
| In reply to | #53970 |
On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 23:40:37 -0000 (UTC) arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> wrote: > I beat my wife. You should stop. -- Cybe R. Wizard My other computer is a HOLMES IV with the Mycroft OS
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-19 21:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q4hsms$aev$4@gonzo.alcatraz> |
| In reply to | #53970 |
On 2019-02-18, arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> wrote: > On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 00:35:20 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote: >> On 19/02/2019 00.26, arlen holder wrote: >>> On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 23:47:02 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote: >>>> It has been already explained that you can not. >>> >>> Carlos, >>> Please STOP proving you are an idiot. >>> Just stop it. >> Ok, I stop reading, as you resort to insulting... > > Carlos, > You make a baseless claim, and then you HIDE behind it > o You don't defend your baseless claim, since you can't. You may consider being called an idiot not to be an insult, but if that is the case then you are an idiot. Othewise his claim is not baseless. If you mean some other claim he made, and you want that claim addressed, then you should not have deleted it, either. -- When I tried casting out nines I made a hash of it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-19 09:21 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <20190219092105.614a9897@WizardsTower> |
| In reply to | #53969 |
On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 00:35:20 +0100 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote: > On 19/02/2019 00.26, arlen holder wrote: > > On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 23:47:02 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote: > >> It has been already explained that you can not. > > > > Carlos, > > Please STOP proving you are an idiot. > > Just stop it. > > Ok, I stop reading, as you resort to insulting... > ...and quite poorly, as usual. Children do it much better. -- Cybe R. Wizard My other computer is a HOLMES IV with the Mycroft OS
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-18 15:55 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <gd0uvkFthndU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #53947 |
arlen holder wrote: > You can't comprehend, for example, that the PUBLICLY SHOWN NNTP posting > host is what I'm trying to change. We are not talking about nntp servers which 'publicly show' (unencrypted) NPH. We ARE talking about nntp servers which do show NPH encrypted. I do NOT believe that decrypting that information is trivial. Use as examples mixmin, individual, and eternal-september. I name those 3 text nntp servers because you are using mixmin, I'm using individual, and eternal-september is a popular free text nntp server. Mixmin does not require authentication and it is free. e-s does require authentication and it is also free. NIN does require authentication and it is not free. All of them allow posting and all of them encrypt the connecting IP. Most nntp servers with a couple of exceptions which allow posting require authentication. You are saying, "I prefer to connect to mixmin using VPN." I am saying "I don't yet understand why you prefer to do that." That question in my understanding of what you are doing is NOT an attack on privacy strategies in general, in spite of the fact that you choose to mischaracterize it. I am further saying or questioning, "I don't even know whether you are preferring to access mixmin via VPN for purposes of concealing your (personal) IP from the admin of mixmin or whether you are preferring to access mixmin via VPN for purposes of concealing your *encrypted* IP from the usenet header readers at large." So, having this discussion with you is like trying to debate an undefined point because you refuse to define your purpose in. Further, you are not a civil discussant; you insult, belittle and act rudely with ad hominem slurs. Those behavioral traits reflect badly on you, not me, so you are the unfortunate and pitiable one for doing so. -- Mike Easter
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-19 00:15 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q4fhqv$g9$1@news.mixmin.net> |
| In reply to | #53975 |
On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 15:55:32 -0800, Mike Easter wrote: > So, having this discussion with you is like trying to debate an > undefined point because you refuse to define your purpose in. Mike, There is a simple 3-word test for ignorant bullshit, Mike: Q: Does a free proxy even exist to post using free nntp news servers? A: *Name just one* The obvious point is that you're not having a "discussion", Mike. o You _never_ intended to have a "discussion" Mike. And it's not a different "point of view" Mike. o You're spewing unrelated off topic completely false statements Mike. Read the opening post, please. o Pretty please. Mike, I _beg_ you to read the opening post. o Please. Please Mike, read the opening post. o Specifically, read the SUBJECT line, Mike. o And then read the closing line, Mike. Is that opening post NOT extremely clear to you Mike? o Seriously. What are you so CONFUSED about, Mike? It's really an extremely SIMPLE question, Mike. This is the extremely simple question in the OP, Mike, is it not? Q: Does a free proxy even exist to post using free nntp news servers? *Name just one* --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-19 00:36 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnq6mjs7.idk.dan@djph.net> |
| In reply to | #53979 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 arlen holder wrote: > On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 15:55:32 -0800, Mike Easter wrote: > >> So, having this discussion with you is like trying to debate an >> undefined point because you refuse to define your purpose in. > > Mike, > > There is a simple 3-word test for ignorant bullshit, Mike: > > Q: Does a free proxy even exist to post using free nntp news servers? > A: *Name just one* Apparently "Mixmin". Also, Eternal-September. However, do note that your use of the word "proxy" in this instance is somewhat incorrect, and that may be leading you down the wrong paths, arlen. So, before going further, I suggest that perhaps you take a step back, and find a different word than "proxy", as NNTP transfer is more akin to SMTP than one of the various protocols that can be (and are) proxied, such as HTTP. > [...] > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > https://www.avast.com/antivirus Technically, you didn't send an email. Might wanna remove this sig from NNTP postings. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEBcqaUD8uEzVNxUrujhHd8xJ5ooEFAlxrT4cACgkQjhHd8xJ5 ooH+fgf+OmPeqst7uh+K4D5Jg+ext+1P69cAJ1/eP6k2o6fqWFcn0XccaFxivhWn Q6EDNr8vYH1iee33b0grFn1uWdtGLVhrw7s8QPQwtrrFzsjq4Wo/akSoiJ9uu3xV G1t6HL/Fri7oO0CoE1qDdEZtDc+Z+T1/1/eQl4PU8pdFfu7KVak37WKNqL7k070l n3wDB2M2/tfeV8tSVRDJQ547fW4cmPPiulXBR9Xqe79CxXl3qcqcZcqvYN7vTUci RlkRGg+Qi/OmoW2YBRI3c5l2WFXdBU+SYCHyuXajUO8VY8DoCwfQBcsnFxB1J3cF 1Mw/h3G4CuWORWHexEir5XRVNC6KMQ== =65E3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- |_|O|_| |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert |O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5 4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-19 00:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q4fk8a$47c$2@news.mixmin.net> |
| In reply to | #53982 |
On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 00:36:23 -0000 (UTC), Dan Purgert wrote: > Apparently "Mixmin". Also, Eternal-September. Troll. Idiot.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-19 03:24 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <vv5sjf-grt.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> |
| In reply to | #53988 |
On 19/02/2019 01.56, arlen holder wrote: > On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 00:36:23 -0000 (UTC), Dan Purgert wrote: > >> Apparently "Mixmin". Also, Eternal-September. > > Troll. > > Idiot. > You loose. -- Cheers, Carlos.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-19 15:07 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q4h62j$rn8$9@news.mixmin.net> |
| In reply to | #53998 |
On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 03:24:31 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote: > You loose. Hi Carlos, Be an adult, Carlos & realize _why_ the thread was opened, Carlos. o Adults use FACT + LOGIC.. FACT: o I knew the (likely) answer when I asked the question, Carlos. LOGIC: o The answer proved Mike's keyword trolling was complete & total bullshit. Q: Does a free proxy even exist to post using free nntp news servers? A: no I now leave this thread to the trolls who infested it long ago.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-19 01:39 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q4fmoh$7n5$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #53979 |
On 2019-02-19, arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> wrote: > On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 15:55:32 -0800, Mike Easter wrote: > >> So, having this discussion with you is like trying to debate an >> undefined point because you refuse to define your purpose in. > > Mike, > > There is a simple 3-word test for ignorant bullshit, Mike: > > Q: Does a free proxy even exist to post using free nntp news servers? > A: *Name just one* The question has no answer because you do not define what Proxy means to you, or "free nntp news server" means. Is posting via a vpn posting with a free proxy? If now why not? If so your question has been answered.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-19 01:51 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnq6mo9b.idk.dan@djph.net> |
| In reply to | #53996 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 William Unruh wrote: > The question has no answer because you do not define what Proxy means to > you, or "free nntp news server" means. > Is posting via a vpn posting with a free proxy? If now why not? If so > your question has been answered. "troll(tm)" :) Coffee and donuts are on the table over there. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEBcqaUD8uEzVNxUrujhHd8xJ5ooEFAlxrYSsACgkQjhHd8xJ5 ooFL2wgAkTlQ7IEsnnhfD/VdrxMSzxRQ22OJekkvK3mFtlEKvjv65H/A2e6lq8CG ARmMw/042eb7FVO/NjitsqB5xLxGKfB9SxQrzHOlNNgZ+Wn+dCI90016GcEe22Ub pbhJhNw4I9DTBANYU0t5VEtssjco8/gq+kObIz5/IgluEkySD55LfwF1k7pXsz/n oFmZJ8+nCT9DslTFWIoXE8b3+Y4v4PCVlATmCNgXCYFClpvjFayI0NfZnba31N8q 16w796HLqy/vkgz4i+IF9STzM7zYY6dDH/byivlg9n3Cv6egIPZ9wRGrQC5TCKjl q3ybgTL8eY8vtUe2xFtXkyppgEYG6Q== =BYH+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- |_|O|_| |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert |O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5 4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-19 03:25 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <026sjf-grt.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> |
| In reply to | #53997 |
On 19/02/2019 02.51, Dan Purgert wrote: > William Unruh wrote: >> The question has no answer because you do not define what Proxy means to >> you, or "free nntp news server" means. >> Is posting via a vpn posting with a free proxy? If now why not? If so >> your question has been answered. > > "troll(tm)" :) > > Coffee and donuts are on the table over there. Send some over here. Sugarless, please :-) -- Cheers, Carlos.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-19 02:36 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnq6mqtj.idk.dan@djph.net> |
| In reply to | #53999 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Carlos E.R. wrote: > On 19/02/2019 02.51, Dan Purgert wrote: >> William Unruh wrote: >>> The question has no answer because you do not define what Proxy means to >>> you, or "free nntp news server" means. >>> Is posting via a vpn posting with a free proxy? If now why not? If so >>> your question has been answered. >> >> "troll(tm)" :) >> >> Coffee and donuts are on the table over there. > > Send some over here. Sugarless, please :-) You got it bud. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEBcqaUD8uEzVNxUrujhHd8xJ5ooEFAlxra7MACgkQjhHd8xJ5 ooFyRggAl1peOsOcDgNUyps9X+w3FO/3qGDFsI9lO2oWCLXQm4SO20/QjDDdxGJR SJBDlY3ak1D04F1DUS7kvHMvJdLb0IoC83J+YpQOAmHBc8wg1IKDr6LyKDuQjyoG iRpuxKtTw+AK1GdZa1bSSWPi1FkFdtpaQ8s89hkp4yJEgneRuY9hXjGOgiU1SW7l UFgVJMTHF5Jb6U972a12Y9uOIFqZZHxe0M7GPFYkIF/3jEAq5t+mksuN2lmJnLx5 lW0FQVbOk8Xg+a/w+M7G3vhPw1wpOi5bZq0LgSQp3d+U0rv/WYqbs3gPE6p8Ivj6 UZ0tflcGTayYpAzQ2C419TxhqhrUEg== =Qaok -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- |_|O|_| |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert |O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5 4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-19 15:06 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q4h62h$rn8$7@news.mixmin.net> |
| In reply to | #53996 |
On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 01:39:30 -0000 (UTC), William Unruh wrote: > The question has no answer because you do not define what Proxy means to > you, or "free nntp news server" means. > Is posting via a vpn posting with a free proxy? If now why not? If so > your question has been answered. Hi William Unruh, Accuracy _and_ repeatability... I am an adult, educated, as are you well educated. o This isn't my first rodeo (nor yours) with keyword troll bullshit. o The strategic point was to validate a keyword trolls' bulshit. Hence, I only speak two things: FACT + LOGIC HINT: I never bullshit(1) Since you're well educated, you know what I mean when I say: o I'm far too well educated in the sciences to resort to bullshit. I don't need bullshit to prove my point, William, like Mike resorted to. o My belief system is based purely on actual FACTS + adult LOGIC. I back up my facts, and, in fact, in thousands of posts (let Cybe(r) Wizard count them), I've _never_ once been wrong on material facts, William.(1) I've written peer-reviewed papers William, just like you have. o My credibility is stellar, William Unruh. o Nobody has _ever_ found a material fact I've stated wrong. And trust me, the have tried (they'd _love_ to find me wrong). Do you know why they can't find me wrong (except on typos)? o It's because I _only_ speak FACT + LOGIC William. Facts are funny that way. o Hence, the answer to your question is in the factual history... FACT: *1. I wrote this quick to-the-point VPN basics for beginners* o How to get up & running on a free public vpn service in minutes on Android or iOS <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.mobile.android/Bv8bwG4ggnc> *2. Mike Easter keyword trolled that thread, posting this article:* o Don't use VPN services. <https://gist.github.com/joepie91/5a9909939e6ce7d09e29> *3. I immediately reviewed the facts in Mike's article as the following:* <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.android/Bv8bwG4ggnc/oAPYdk4QEgAJ> Mike Easter _continued_ to incessantly keyword troll the thread, in essence, ruining itfor beginners (which was, likely, Mike's intention from the start for all I know, since nothing Mike said passed even the simple 3-word ignorance test). Bear in mind that the thread Mike keyword trolled wasn't trying to be controversial; it was just a two-step beginner tutorial for Christs' sake. But the keyword trolls _always_ respond _only_ to the keyword: o In this case, Mike's long-ago-prepared spiel was "against VPN". *Every single time keyword trolls "see" the keyword, their spiel ensues!* o The keyword trolls don't even _read_ (nor comprehend) the topic! They're like a cat pouncing on a laser beam... o All that matters to keyword trolls is that the keyword was moving! Since Mike refused to comprehend that the proxy his article suggests doesn't likely even exist, I brought that exact question over here, and let Mike know I did that (since I am an adult). I _knew_ the most likely answer - but - being open to facts, I asked: Q: *Does a free proxy even exist to post using free nntp news servers?* A: *no* You see, William Unruh, like you, I'm very well educated, where I _only_ speak FACT + LOGIC, and _all_ my facts are easily validated & verified. Accuracy _and_ repeatability... -- NOTE 1: Since I'm human, and since Usenet is a casual medium, I must have been wrong at least once on material fact in thousands of posts; but nobody has ever found it (rest assured, they've tried, where all they can do is play silly semantic games with the facts).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-19 16:00 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnq6oa03.idk.dan@djph.net> |
| In reply to | #54020 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 arlen holder wrote: > On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 01:39:30 -0000 (UTC), William Unruh wrote: > >> The question has no answer because you do not define what Proxy means to >> you, or "free nntp news server" means. >> Is posting via a vpn posting with a free proxy? If now why not? If so >> your question has been answered. > > > FACT: > *1. I wrote this quick to-the-point VPN basics for beginners* > o How to get up & running on a free public vpn service in minutes on > Android or iOS ><https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.mobile.android/Bv8bwG4ggnc> I read it, it's got a few problems that were pointed out in that thread. > *2. Mike Easter keyword trolled that thread, posting this article:* > o Don't use VPN services. > <https://gist.github.com/joepie91/5a9909939e6ce7d09e29> He gave an alternative viewpoint that using a VPN as a glorified proxy (as your posting advocated) wasn't necessarily the best idea, and backed it up with a post on github. > > Bear in mind that the thread Mike keyword trolled wasn't trying to be > controversial; it was just a two-step beginner tutorial for Christs' sake. Really, the issue is advocating a glorified-proxy-VPN for various reasons. The ONLY thing it does is hide your activity from your ISP -- and in many cases, just gives it to the VPN provider. You gotta ask yourself if you trust the VPN provider more than the ISP (and yes, there are instances where that may actually be true). > But the keyword trolls _always_ respond _only_ to the keyword: > o In this case, Mike's long-ago-prepared spiel was "against VPN". Actually, it was against using vpn *as a glorified proxy*. That last bit is key. > Since Mike refused to comprehend that the proxy his article suggests > doesn't likely even exist, I brought that exact question over here, > and let Mike know I did that (since I am an adult). Proxies exist. Not for NNTP, but they definitely exist. Seems you didn't comprehend the article Mike Easter linked, as it was talking specifically about using a VPN as a glorified proxy for web-browsing (and further admitted that there are times when it's the only option). -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEBcqaUD8uEzVNxUrujhHd8xJ5ooEFAlxsKAMACgkQjhHd8xJ5 ooHV8Af8COWkccLfDcsPfSIEaE7UZeH/T+BSxJrPYt38ASwjLs+F7csOE4Hlv5+x uKd9qM+KJ7Tl/LdHv7qpuukquZ/VFHZJHgOWdGThhfUL8n0Py68eQx+H5FGGziiT AXuJqzQTtvc8XhbhKf3+ynDbflGs44Sx/BoD2CvqXafFA0C05uolHb8HFmyaO+qg woHztIx57QCnnquF95gLO0teSlnxnh96oAZqwxWQmVqnxhXcRb6nt2arGo9U8RVs AOAIBMtouM0oM64DdT4co0UicNsHH065gAC4RwJXZTzm7JDI5M+d10PrrDowEmr/ hcIC3/gnw6vYjTJRyQLm0UVu5tb8vg== =qDoC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- |_|O|_| |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert |O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5 4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-19 09:25 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <gd2sglFbtohU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #54039 |
Dan Purgert wrote: > Seems you didn't comprehend the article Mike Easter linked, as it was > talking specifically about using a VPN as a glorified proxy for > web-browsing (and further admitted that there are times when it's the > only option). That article that got arlen so upset wasn't a particularly good article, but the lengthy comments section debating its point-of-view brought it a much better balance. The author did use an inflammatory title, 'Don't use vpns', but the reason I cited the article (as well as its comments) just like the reason I had previously cited a much better website TOPS was to try to bring some balance to all of the hype about VPNs. I didn't think arlen's 'tutorials' were addressing the need for that balance or VPN 'wariness'. Not so good article; but lotsa comments: https://gist.github.com/joepie91/5a9909939e6ce7d09e29 Great TOPS site for VPN research: https://thatoneprivacysite.net/ -- Mike Easter
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-19 18:28 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnq6oiml.idk.dan@djph.net> |
| In reply to | #54054 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Mike Easter wrote: > Dan Purgert wrote: >> Seems you didn't comprehend the article Mike Easter linked, as it was >> talking specifically about using a VPN as a glorified proxy for >> web-browsing (and further admitted that there are times when it's the >> only option). > > That article that got arlen so upset wasn't a particularly good article, It wasn't particularly bad, either. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEBcqaUD8uEzVNxUrujhHd8xJ5ooEFAlxsStQACgkQjhHd8xJ5 ooFXEQf+NlKE/SNyvkoxcZjEEg0Ql0TjOUj7OC36fQBqxy5Zzy1FSWi2G/eY6L2K lZ28ESbTFLs2/qwAVjYPcZ14fCSoDmFt82ZqPHgxlENTg/lqo1vjiiRApmPPMPNb aAN/geTTks3JLJBvMJM6xe5Q0rwoudtR5HBHJQMkq55T8Nc3HhSfvBNYE2MhjPLX foP6a9ZG9e+0o6comuVaB11MhjVFH8860hD0WFw18nuBnshwy7WHDJVt7c8icPXl kNy43MHljXE5KJf60wL+WpEVQhpLi2Q493NHNLS/M6WHeDWrXvKKwPGWbhylgfQ3 RqDRU+PCzEU/WfDukIVs5FqaguoTAg== =17GW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- |_|O|_| |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert |O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5 4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-19 19:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q4hk28$t65$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #54056 |
On 2019-02-19, Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> wrote: > > Mike Easter wrote: >> Dan Purgert wrote: >>> Seems you didn't comprehend the article Mike Easter linked, as it was >>> talking specifically about using a VPN as a glorified proxy for >>> web-browsing (and further admitted that there are times when it's the >>> only option). >> >> That article that got arlen so upset wasn't a particularly good article, > > It wasn't particularly bad, either. As always, it depends on what you are trying to protect yourself from. The article says that the VPN provider is a weak link, and you cannot and should not trust them to maintain your secrecy. And that VPN providers are more likely than most providers to be up to no good. The first is certainly true, the second probably. So, it is up to the user to decide what it is that they need to protect, and what adversaries they want to protect themselves from. If it is from the US government, they are in trouble, as almost anything they do can be circumvented Here we are talking about usenet posts. They are by definition public, so it is not the content that is being protected. So it seems it is the source of the post that is being protected, by someone who does not want to identify themselves. If it is because they want to protect their nymshifting, I have no sympathy. If they want to remain anonymous from the public because of danger to them (eg posting news that the government does not want broadcast), then posts via a vpn in a foreign country might work, although the traffic from the person's machine to the VPN will still be discoverable. But of course that would be true for any "proxy". If it is protection from other random readers on usenet, then a VPN is almost certainly adequate, since the VPN proivider is not going to divulge the info to any random person. If they promise not to log traffic, then responding to anyone withthe information would too easily give lie to their promise. Anyway, if anonymity is your requirement, then you have to spend the time and effort at first asking who you are protecting yourself from, how many resources they have or could want to devote to discovering who you are, and how best to protect yourself. If you are just paranoid, then there is no solution at all, since any defence can easily be overcome by the "enemy" and so resistance if futile. > > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-19 11:52 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <gd354oFdqgiU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #54058 |
William Unruh wrote: > The article says that the VPN provider is a weak link, and you cannot > and should not trust them to maintain your secrecy. And that VPN > providers are more likely than most providers to be up to no good. > The first is certainly true, the second probably. What I'm seeing is a wave or a sea of hype. I believe the natural behavior of 'the masses' is to sense all of the hype about VPNs and to decide to 'look into' what it is all about. That causes them to search on VPNs or search on free VPNs or best VPNs or whatever so that they can get started in the 'right direction'. That process leads them in the wrong direction -- not a good thing. For exercise, I just searched on free vpn and a high ranking hit was "Top 7 (REALLY FREE) VPN Services That Still Work in 2019" from a site specializing in vpn stuff. That site is actually shilling for a couple of non-free vpns to steer the reader toward a free trial of non-free. How likely is the overall advice or article to be good? In any case, as with many other things, the journey is difficult, truth elusive. It is worthwhile discussing or debating about these things but arlen isn't the one to be doing it with. -- Mike Easter
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 13 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.os.linux
csiph-web