Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.os.linux > #52729 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Diesel <me@privacy.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-01-17 23:14 +0000 |
| Last post | 2019-01-28 15:27 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 159 — 17 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.os.linux
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-17 23:14 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-18 00:12 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-18 00:58 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-17 19:29 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-18 06:27 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-18 02:00 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-18 02:08 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-18 14:29 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-23 03:49 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-23 11:22 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-28 05:29 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-28 13:45 +0000
NF -- Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-04 03:59 +0000
NF -- Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-15 04:31 +0000
Re: NF -- Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-15 11:26 +0000
Re: NF -- Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-16 04:51 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-01-20 20:55 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-20 16:02 -0500
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-01-23 01:14 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-23 03:49 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-23 11:34 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-01-23 19:23 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-23 20:24 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-28 05:30 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-01-28 19:16 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-30 04:32 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-01-30 05:18 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-03 02:14 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-23 00:32 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-01-23 20:41 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-23 20:49 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-23 15:46 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-23 15:38 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2019-01-23 15:50 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-23 15:59 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-23 22:06 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-23 16:09 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-24 00:07 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-23 18:27 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2019-01-23 19:16 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-24 02:00 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-23 20:58 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-23 21:11 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-01-24 07:50 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-01-24 07:56 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-24 02:34 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-24 11:54 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-24 07:51 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-24 02:49 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-24 13:39 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-24 08:19 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-01-24 06:10 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid> - 2019-01-25 09:14 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-01-25 17:42 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-24 00:02 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-23 19:30 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-24 02:14 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-24 15:54 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-24 16:41 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-24 23:08 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-24 23:37 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-01-25 06:11 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-25 07:04 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-25 16:48 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-28 05:31 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-28 13:33 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-28 08:23 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-28 15:43 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-30 04:32 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-30 04:32 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-29 22:41 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-30 12:34 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-30 04:32 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-30 12:26 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-01-26 03:56 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-28 05:31 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-25 07:09 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-01-25 14:38 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2019-01-25 09:49 -0500
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-01-25 17:42 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2019-01-25 10:07 -0800
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-25 16:51 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-28 05:31 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-28 05:31 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-25 16:23 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-01-25 22:43 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-25 17:18 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-25 15:21 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Wildman <best_lay@yahoo.com> - 2019-01-25 17:19 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-25 23:21 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-25 17:36 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-28 05:31 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-28 05:31 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <XxuB8T967dUpoKQ8.R9P892p5GIKabIS11TMpG7N8dpaGh90cjaXByxpT@dont-email.me> - 2019-01-20 22:09 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-25 07:14 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-01-25 14:38 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2019-01-25 16:34 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2019-01-25 11:49 -0500
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-25 16:02 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-01-25 22:41 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-25 17:14 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-25 16:08 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-25 16:11 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-25 16:17 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-25 15:16 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-01-25 20:41 +0100
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-01-27 02:02 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid> - 2019-02-15 19:15 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-28 05:31 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-28 15:21 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-30 04:32 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-30 12:25 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-03 02:14 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-03 02:31 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-03 23:26 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-21 04:51 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-01-18 04:18 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-18 06:27 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-18 15:01 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-18 09:27 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-21 04:51 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-20 23:56 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-23 03:49 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-21 12:11 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-23 03:49 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-23 01:27 -0600
OT: .sig. Was:Re: I just belatedly realized and on and on and on... "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-23 01:34 -0600
Re: OT: .sig. Was:Re: I just belatedly realized and on and on and on... Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2019-01-23 03:39 -0500
Re: OT: .sig. Was:Re: I just belatedly realized and on and on and on... "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-23 03:04 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-01-23 09:05 +0100
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-23 02:25 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-01-23 10:30 +0100
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-23 03:40 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-28 05:30 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-28 01:33 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-28 05:30 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-01-28 11:50 +0100
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-30 04:32 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-01-30 05:24 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-03 02:14 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-02-03 08:08 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-03 23:26 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-02-04 05:45 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-08 07:33 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-01-30 09:04 +0100
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-03 02:14 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-28 05:30 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-23 12:18 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-28 05:31 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-28 15:13 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-04 03:59 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-25 07:17 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-01-25 14:38 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-28 05:30 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-25 14:49 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-27 20:36 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-28 05:30 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-28 05:31 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-28 15:27 +0000
Page 4 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 Next page →
| From | "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-24 23:37 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <20190124233758.71f87c73@WizardsTower> |
| In reply to | #53039 |
On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 23:08:39 -0000 (UTC) Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> wrote: > Cybe R. Wizard wrote: > > On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 15:54:43 -0600 > > "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> wrote: > > > >> The Dunning/Kruger effect is just that, a psychological EFFECT > >> which is not graphed or even graph-able. > > > > Such proves not to be the case: > > https://graphpaperdiaries.com/2017/08/20/the-real-dunning-kruger-graph/ > > > > So, pretty much, in a given subset of people (say alt.os.linux), the > lower half of people will overestimate their capacity for $whatever, > the third quarter will hover on-par with their skill, and the top > quarter will underestimate. > > Hm, fun stuff. > That would appear to be the case at first sight but I'm pretty sure it only really applies to 'lay' people. Any group of non-random folks better educated to begin with (fans of <anything>, tech groups, OS-focused groups, train groups, etc.) will have a deviated curve without the high degree of overconfidence within that knowledge set. At least that's what it seems to me it would have to be like, but then I'm no expert and therefore am very likely to have already overestimated my own abilities. ;-} OTOH, Bubba and his buddies down on the bayou aren't ever gonna intentionally 'larn anythin' and so will always permanently reside on the low education, overconfident-about-everything level. You know, intuitive rocket surgeons. Might I suggest that they might be MAGA[1]-capped? This I know very well because I personally know (well, knew) Bubba and his buddies down on the bayou. +1 for fun stuff! [1] Make Attorneys Get Attorneys Cybe R. Wizard -has lived in New Orleans and Lafayette, LA -- “Thinking too much leads to paralysis by analysis. It's important to think things through, but many use thinking as a means of avoiding action.” Robert Herjavec The Will To Win: Leading, Competing, Succeeding
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 06:11 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q2e9b5$god$1@news.mixmin.net> |
| In reply to | #53041 |
On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 23:37:58 -0600, Cybe R. Wizard wrote: > That would appear to be the case at first sight but I'm pretty sure it > only really applies to 'lay' people. >> https://graphpaperdiaries.com/2017/08/20/the-real-dunning-kruger-graph/ I'm going to risk responding to you Cybe(r) Wizard (& Dan Purgert) as an adult would - which - I realize - is likely an exercise in futility (particulary because both of you play silly little semantic games). The DK effect is a cognitive bias which is why I used 3 categories to explain the type of responses that you, Diesel, Snit, nospam, etc., exhibit. 1. Either you really _are_ that incredibly stupid, or, 2. Perhaps you're constantly playing silly semantic games for amusement, or 3. You suffer greatly from what I call "left-side" DK effects. What I meant by "left side" was clear to anyone who _comprehends" the reputed DK effect, where, on what I call the "left side" (based on actual skills): o People with low abilities tend to overestimate their abilities o And they tend to overestimate what it takes for others to attain their level of ability On the right side of actual skills: o People with high abilities tend to underestimate their abilities o And they tend to underestimate what it takes for others to attain their level of ability The folks in the middle ... tend to estimate more realistically, according to the research papers I read when they first came out. Notice two things that were consistent in all my posts (oh, shit, I just realized I'm speaking to you, Cybe R. WIzard, the proven semantic troll), so I had better say "most" of my posts or even "some" of my posts, just in case I didn't ALWAYS in every single instance on Usenet say it precisely - since you Cybe R Wizard play your idiot semantic games incessantly because, well, because o Either you really _are_ that incredibly stupid, or, o You're just incessantly playing your childish semantic games, or, o You actually _believe_ what you say - which makes you a left-side DK candidate. So, notice the two consistent things I stated: 1. I gave THREE possible reasons, only one of which was outright stupidity 2. I always said "left side" when speaking about the DK effect That's because the DK effect is not based on stupidity. It's based on cognitive bias in self-assessment of skills. Personally, it's my observation (oh shit, I'm dealing with Cybe R Wizard the ultimate semantic idiot so I have to say that this is my guess, my observation, my feeling, my assessment, my assumption, etc., since I'm dealing with Cybe R Wizard who proves incessantly that he is an utter child when it comes to casual Usenet conversation in that he plays a silly semantic game which is _all_ he _can_ play - since he never (oh shit, again, I have to realize I'm talking to Cybe R Wizard, the ultimate semantic troll, so I have to say "almost never" comprehends the topic at hand). Jesus Christ. To even _try_ to converse with semantic trolls like you proved time and again (scores of times this week alone ... oh shit, I'm dealing with the ultimate semantic troll Cybe R Wizard, so I can't say "scores of times" in a casual Usenet conversation because then Cybe R Wizard will post incessantly that it was only "dozens of times" into completely non-related threads - even threads I have no part of creating - since Cybe R Wizard proves time and again to be the ultimate semantic troll). It turns out, Cybe R Wizard, it's impossible to talk to you, as if you are an adult. I just don't have the skill set required to drop down to your level. I apologize. I just can't drop to your level and cover every semantic game your tiny little childish brain can come up with. I just can't. Suffice to say for "ADULTS" (i.e., not Cybe R Wizard, or Dan Purgert), there is a _reason_ I kept distinguishing between THREE different situations: 1. People who are truly stupid 2. People who are just pulling our leg 3. People who exhibit classic left-side DK cognitive bias The question is which of those three are people like: o Snit o Char Jackson o Rene Lamantagne o Jasen Betts o Wolf K o Rudy Weiser o Jolly Roger o nospam o Lewis o haemactylus o Alan Baker o Alan Browne o Tim Streater o Dan Purgert o Cybe R Wizard o Diesel, Dustin Cook, and a host of other nyms o etc. A _classic_ situation is _this_ one by the way, where you have to wonder whether Snit is (a) incredibly stupid, or (b) pulling our leg, or (c) he really can't comprehend that he can't comprehend simple facts. *VIDEO:* o <https://youtu.be/7QaABa6DFIo> *USENET:* o <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/PZuec56EWB0/qSXecrnZAQAJ> You tell me. Is Snit, in that exact situation: a. Incredibly stupid b. Just pulling our leg c. Or does he _really_ believe he showed "signal" strength? HINT: Look at the Y axis of his graph. Snit posted that video in over 400 Usenet posts. Never _once_ did he even _look_ (or comprehend?) the Y axis. And neither did Jolly Roger, nospam, or a host of the others on that list! I can't comprehend such idiocy. It boggles my mind in fact. What I wonder is only which of the three they all prove to be: a. Are they _really_ that incredibly stupid? b. Or, are they just always making everything up? c. Or do they really _believe_ what they write? You tell me after watching that video & reading that (sad) thread. (It's sad that people are _that_ incredibly wrong - and they don't even realize it - yet - they post that even after you explain facts to them.)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 07:04 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <20190125070411.21aed70c@WizardsTower> |
| In reply to | #53042 |
On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 06:11:50 -0000 (UTC) arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> wrote: > you Cybe R Wizard play your idiot semantic games It isn't a semantic game to call a liar a liar. You, sir, are a liar. Otherwise you would not have claimed to have written over TEN THOUSAND tutorials or at least one a day, every day (no holidays or weekends off) for over 27 YEARS. That isn't a mistake, it isn't an accident or a semantic game. That, sir, is an intentional lie. You, sir, are a liar. This is not a semantic game; it is the plain truth for any and all to see in: Message-ID: <po4626$vpu$1@news.mixmin.net> Each time you sidestep or ignore the disclosing of your lies you show yourself to be the lying, duplicitous, and idiotically evil person that you are. Cybe R. Wizard -- Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil. Plato
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 16:48 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <20190125164756.3f160249@WizardsTower> |
| In reply to | #53043 |
On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 17:42:06 -0000 (UTC) arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> wrote: > Hi Cybe(r) Wizard, > > Notwithstanding the fact that _one_ tutorial, is far more than you've > contributed, what's amazing is your complete & utter lack of > comprehension. I perceive and fully comprehend that it would be almost an impossibility for one person to have written TEN THOUSAND tutorials as you have claimed in: Message-ID: <po4626$vpu$1@news.mixmin.net> Help me comprehend otherwise by showing us that list. Cybe R. Wizard -- Comprehension follows perception. Philip K. Dick “Truth is only relative to those that ignore hard evidence.” A.E. Samaan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Diesel <me@privacy.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-28 05:31 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA9E55DD4B851HT1@u0ECeNR06M8rvC48OAE0PoWATk.R71Y3.1XH5k> |
| In reply to | #53043 |
arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> news:q2fhpc$ia6$4@news.mixmin.net Fri, 25 Jan 2019 17:42:06 GMT in alt.os.linux, wrote: > On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 07:04:11 -0600, Cybe R. Wizard wrote: > >> It isn't a semantic game to call a liar a liar. You, sir, are a >> liar. > > Hi Cybe(r) Wizard, > > Notwithstanding the fact that _one_ tutorial, is far more than > you've contributed Not with standing that you haven't got the foggiest idea what Cybe has or hasn't written has nothing to do with your prior claims of having written ten thousand tutorials for the benefit of the tribal knowledge. You can easily clear up the misunderstanding you caused by stating you were figuratively speaking and not literally. If you comprehended the difference, that is. It's semi obvious though, that you do not. As, instead of clarifying what you meant by the statement, you're attempting to distract from being called out by stating that one tutorial is far more than cybe has contributed, except that you have no actual proof to back that statement up, either. I don't think anyone actually took your statements in the literal sense. If anything, they've been giving you a simple and easy way out of the lie accusation, by using the proper terminology to describe what you were actually doing. Think of it as a test, based on curiosity concerning your own reading/writing comprehension level. The proper word to use to describe your ten thousand tutorial claim is figurative. So much for that superior cali education. Yes, I'm confident you aren't familiar with the words meaning, because, had you been, you would have put the matter to rest when it was first brought up. Instead, you dance around it, like a small child who's been caught, red handed doing something they shouldn't have been doing. > HINT: You missed all formally published notes - which you can't > comprehend. I was reading multiple layer electronic schematic diagrams before I could properly print my name. So, let's drop the comprehend nonsense. I comprehend subjects far above your paygrade, just fine. > To wit, you don't even _comprehend_ what I claimed. > o Far worse ... sadly ... you can't comprehend that you can't > comprehend. Please, use proper grammar when trying to be insulting. It's like using a gun with the business end pointed in the wrong direction. Arlen, my man, you are one of the very reasons warning stickers exist. For example, on an anti personal mine, it clearly states which side should be facing the enemy. Just in case you aren't smart enough to know this, or you didn't pay attention during training. Yes, Arlen, people just like you are why those stickers exist. It's a security blanket for actual low intelligence persons. Incidently, those stickers aren't placed on such things if only one person fucks up. Multiple people all had to do the same thing for the sticker cost to be approved. And that's not restricted to military things, either. > You prove me correct in _every_ repetition of your lack of > comprehension. Your statement as provided, untouched by you, isn't logical and doesn't make any actual sense. It might as well be random words strung together. The end result is the same. -- All work and no play, will make you a manager.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-28 13:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnq4u14h.3u3.dan@xps-linux.djph.net> |
| In reply to | #53268 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Diesel wrote: > [...] > I was reading multiple layer electronic schematic diagrams before I > could properly print my name. So, let's drop the comprehend nonsense. > I comprehend subjects far above your paygrade, just fine. I bet those get fun. > >> To wit, you don't even _comprehend_ what I claimed. >> o Far worse ... sadly ... you can't comprehend that you can't >> comprehend. > > Please, use proper grammar when trying to be insulting. It's like > using a gun with the business end pointed in the wrong direction. Oh, he's Polish. This makes SO much more sense now. > > Arlen, my man, you are one of the very reasons warning stickers > exist. For example, on an anti personal mine, it clearly states which > side should be facing the enemy. Just in case you aren't smart enough > to know this, or you didn't pay attention during training. Yes, > Arlen, people just like you are why those stickers exist. It's a > security blanket for actual low intelligence persons. I still say we should remove them, and let Darwin sort out the problem. Everyone else says I'm a heartless bastard for some reason. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEBcqaUD8uEzVNxUrujhHd8xJ5ooEFAlxPBJAACgkQjhHd8xJ5 ooEs9AgAqkvZU1hVuFdc/azsC8HQcy0/52ieX5vXnMUZxHrzUX9Kr0dQudHljgy3 IGSAgLGZFEBJLKUEPi54zKgEuAS8yh+lFVV+5i8Vqn8RftFF/DtZvumSh+j66rSi yDui/E7ncahjiKs8xB0K7LxqlWx0idNUIDSVVuQSJn5zu1S0gDe/a5ThT5vxci1y 0vpRbeyZhXVssW4epTJixjfXIx8hcAWg9y+DWDmZCMJmLd5e+VY2ZEXMiRIlf8w6 aRh5zOByvzIpRVbTC6ARvZ3uJd0+OnoUky1R/pQCFj+wzDJmyk37pPc5AqCzmmPX ZlK4cj5+JzIRm4JchhY1nlSGqvhmeQ== =I/Xd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- |_|O|_| |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert |O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5 4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-28 08:23 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <20190128082326.3b1a4aa0@WizardsTower> |
| In reply to | #53282 |
On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 13:33:05 -0000 (UTC) Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> wrote: [idiot stickers] > I still say we should remove them, and let Darwin sort out the > problem. I agree with that completely. You may be a BOFH! > Everyone else says I'm a heartless bastard for some reason. It may well be your most endearing quality. Cybe R. Wizard - ;-] -- The standard way to start an obfuscating article is "Let's make things clear". Korpela's 42 Laws about Usenet
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-28 15:43 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnq4u8or.3u3.dan@xps-linux.djph.net> |
| In reply to | #53285 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Cybe R. Wizard wrote: > On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 13:33:05 -0000 (UTC) > Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> wrote: > > [idiot stickers] > >> I still say we should remove them, and let Darwin sort out the >> problem. > > I agree with that completely. You may be a BOFH! I only put the 208v leg of the 3-phase down the cat-5 that ONE time when the boss was sucking the bit jam out... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEBcqaUD8uEzVNxUrujhHd8xJ5ooEFAlxPIxoACgkQjhHd8xJ5 ooHD0wf/d3Ra9L/2fI7h2VRr3+XB1a4gL2iR/q4X1eAhcwEcF32kaeah8hr309gt D4qQ6rx5AHSesFgfrf+GyJFyVcX3uZUhwqw8MZ5MiyTuvka7f1JWI/NzejmhMiPI PYp3iuWtwLPExlO6nPqogk/+gpi3j7MDFTNQKl++VdSktGslZPNhYG5BRoauUXQD khHr9RL5k4TqmsRTqfG7s2jcKELAE5XMMOnEoltKiKsfFaj2MzI8wJ30NsopHcXQ gvdvCWBgXB8Y/yBTVtilkVmh5rZyvVzokvXDmHLDKZJIT5KibSqSR08XNs8redoq ufS10fYeekTt82ynZaOeDWh+nsmnow== =K8ex -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- |_|O|_| |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert |O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5 4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Diesel <me@privacy.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-30 04:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA9E6F01B5AE94HT1@1V7NNc6Rrr0.4270tgFchlo8Om7EPe7r.zUJT8aeJ465jg16wu9IM> |
| In reply to | #53291 |
Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> news:slrnq4u8or.3u3.dan@xps-linux.djph.net Mon, 28 Jan 2019 15:43:23 GMT in alt.os.linux, wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > Cybe R. Wizard wrote: >> On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 13:33:05 -0000 (UTC) >> Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> wrote: >> >> [idiot stickers] >> >>> I still say we should remove them, and let Darwin sort out the >>> problem. >> >> I agree with that completely. You may be a BOFH! > > I only put the 208v leg of the 3-phase down the cat-5 that ONE time > when the boss was sucking the bit jam out... Well, that gives wildleg an all new meaning then doesn't it... -- Veteran of the Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1990-1951.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Diesel <me@privacy.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-30 04:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA9E6F01AD5627HT1@1V7NNc6Rrr0.4270tgFchlo8Om7EPe7r.zUJT8aeJ465jg16wu9IM> |
| In reply to | #53285 |
"Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> news:20190128082326.3b1a4aa0@WizardsTower Mon, 28 Jan 2019 14:23:26 GMT in alt.os.linux, wrote: > On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 13:33:05 -0000 (UTC) > Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> wrote: > > [idiot stickers] > >> I still say we should remove them, and let Darwin sort out the >> problem. > > I agree with that completely. You may be a BOFH! I've been an avid fan of BOFH for a long time. >> Everyone else says I'm a heartless bastard for some reason. > > It may well be your most endearing quality. Sarcasm suits you well. :) -- Bakers trade bread recipes on a kneadtoknow basis.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-29 22:41 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <20190129224153.5408451b@WizardsTower> |
| In reply to | #53362 |
On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 04:32:18 -0000 (UTC) Diesel <me@privacy.net> wrote: > "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> > news:20190128082326.3b1a4aa0@WizardsTower Mon, 28 Jan 2019 14:23:26 > GMT in alt.os.linux, wrote: > > > On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 13:33:05 -0000 (UTC) > > Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> wrote: > > > > [idiot stickers] > > > >> I still say we should remove them, and let Darwin sort out the > >> problem. > > > > I agree with that completely. You may be a BOFH! > > I've been an avid fan of BOFH for a long time. Ditto. ...and Dan is OK, too, I guess. ;-] > > >> Everyone else says I'm a heartless bastard for some reason. > > > > It may well be your most endearing quality. > > Sarcasm suits you well. :) > And it comes with two pair of pants! Cybe R. Wizard -- Tell your mother that any clothes she wants to purchase you as a gift has to be suitable for a job interview. Karen Bender
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-30 12:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnq536er.61d.dan@xps-linux.djph.net> |
| In reply to | #53367 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Cybe R. Wizard wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 04:32:18 -0000 (UTC) > Diesel <me@privacy.net> wrote: > >> "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> >> news:20190128082326.3b1a4aa0@WizardsTower Mon, 28 Jan 2019 14:23:26 >> GMT in alt.os.linux, wrote: >> >> > On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 13:33:05 -0000 (UTC) >> > Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> wrote: >> > >> > [idiot stickers] >> > >> >> I still say we should remove them, and let Darwin sort out the >> >> problem. >> > >> > I agree with that completely. You may be a BOFH! >> >> I've been an avid fan of BOFH for a long time. > > Ditto. ...and Dan is OK, too, I guess. ;-] Well, that's better than the alternative. >> >> >> Everyone else says I'm a heartless bastard for some reason. >> > >> > It may well be your most endearing quality. >> >> Sarcasm suits you well. :) >> > And it comes with two pair of pants! Ugh, that's about as bad of a joke as arlen saying he's one of the "adults". -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEBcqaUD8uEzVNxUrujhHd8xJ5ooEFAlxRmdsACgkQjhHd8xJ5 ooGUfwf/XyuQw3R0rjsmUSyg58koP8iAAGiUyIONUYe0Oa0/okTppH1qZy6OJt2P ORM5TzSWMr3RysF7Y0lPq4MA1Q6j7Ygopz+y/fYPvT27GjAu9vLKGR7AxhrQMuEr nDn97ngSrVJgeB6/8CoqsmpA/ZklxpC7AglABo8nSIfAEnkVyinnT0MmPrLBwpYs ypkKvlpEh48Il2DNBibco/3p0tleCm7pyOVpW1adIyEK4DV5NsRoLuF+SZGtVSYU JZK4Dv4+It8Xx+B6B/0pj2/5+kcfnFRhs90NWEfCXK3cmogECW3/fs9/jC4ZPpRb dR2Ed/YnQNHQC9g1l2vuOTGKS5T35g== =nkrV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- |_|O|_| |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert |O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5 4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Diesel <me@privacy.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-30 04:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA9E6F01A624E3HT1@1V7NNc6Rrr0.4270tgFchlo8Om7EPe7r.zUJT8aeJ465jg16wu9IM> |
| In reply to | #53282 |
Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> news:slrnq4u14h.3u3.dan@xps-linux.djph.net Mon, 28 Jan 2019 13:33:05 GMT in alt.os.linux, wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > Diesel wrote: >> [...] >> I was reading multiple layer electronic schematic diagrams before >> I could properly print my name. So, let's drop the comprehend >> nonsense. I comprehend subjects far above your paygrade, just >> fine. > > I bet those get fun. They can. Some, to the point of near insanity. I've spent days on some of them. >> Please, use proper grammar when trying to be insulting. It's like >> using a gun with the business end pointed in the wrong direction. > > Oh, he's Polish. This makes SO much more sense now. ROFL! >> Arlen, my man, you are one of the very reasons warning stickers >> exist. For example, on an anti personal mine, it clearly states >> which side should be facing the enemy. Just in case you aren't >> smart enough to know this, or you didn't pay attention during >> training. Yes, Arlen, people just like you are why those stickers >> exist. It's a security blanket for actual low intelligence >> persons. > > I still say we should remove them, and let Darwin sort out the > problem. I'm inclined to agree, but, we're in the minority. Perhaps the risk of too many deaths and not enough births to compensate? lol > Everyone else says I'm a heartless bastard for some reason. I couldn't imagine why. hehehehe. -- Anything currently on the market is obsolete.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-30 12:26 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnq5360f.61d.dan@xps-linux.djph.net> |
| In reply to | #53361 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Diesel wrote: > Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> > news:slrnq4u14h.3u3.dan@xps-linux.djph.net Mon, 28 Jan 2019 13:33:05 > GMT in alt.os.linux, wrote: > >> >> I still say we should remove them, and let Darwin sort out the >> problem. > > I'm inclined to agree, but, we're in the minority. Perhaps the risk > of too many deaths and not enough births to compensate? lol Well, if "Idocracy" is any indication, the problem wouldn't be solved anyway. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEBcqaUD8uEzVNxUrujhHd8xJ5ooEFAlxRmA8ACgkQjhHd8xJ5 ooGwigf9Ed00Hn2MJZbjhRQSo9snMH2Rza2zuWPhOboJqeHwsogzTigUeVf2+sG2 VKIeFYuz5cMC/qoObri/sxMVOp+TgB2NRIt3t6zpGCjlG43Ku97AG7tvdIcy+9WG PcfkjHpZ5IHqAP1Kp6Ju8tDKsBFjDLLglrN0e6AoQiE5h8SQdaZ8UzXYaxi5bryp sOGvH4z/Vlyd2ssuqg+sHWWP+Wpte5NMTS9SrrBzXlRkC7MKWr/Voo5NQVJlq1vy CR0xc/BDRhgw0/gNgQZDydtQ9ubjZEj80ANyai+3mxArCYhx1gP2RTL6TPKOVODM JD2yUPSiMGoVzY7uhfJQP6oEvWIT+g== =Wrw/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- |_|O|_| |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert |O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5 4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-26 03:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q2glq4$u8$1@gonzo.alcatraz> |
| In reply to | #53042 |
On 2019-01-25, arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> wrote: > On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 23:37:58 -0600, Cybe R. Wizard wrote: > >> That would appear to be the case at first sight but I'm pretty sure it >> only really applies to 'lay' people. >>> https://graphpaperdiaries.com/2017/08/20/the-real-dunning-kruger-graph/ > > I'm going to risk responding to you Cybe(r) Wizard (& Dan Purgert) > as an adult would I got to see this, it should be epic.. > - which - I realize - is likely an exercise in futility > (particulary because both of you play silly little semantic games). Childish insults straight off the line. Epic fail, will you ever grop up? tldr -- When I tried casting out nines I made a hash of it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Diesel <me@privacy.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-28 05:31 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA9E55DCCA05CHT1@u0ECeNR06M8rvC48OAE0PoWATk.R71Y3.1XH5k> |
| In reply to | #53042 |
arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> news:q2e9b5$god$1@news.mixmin.net Fri, 25 Jan 2019 06:11:50 GMT in alt.os.linux, wrote: > On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 23:37:58 -0600, Cybe R. Wizard wrote: > >> That would appear to be the case at first sight but I'm pretty >> sure it only really applies to 'lay' people. >>> https://graphpaperdiaries.com/2017/08/20/the-real-dunning-kruger- >>> graph/ > > I'm going to risk responding to you Cybe(r) Wizard (& Dan Purgert) > as an adult would - which - I realize - is likely an exercise in > futility (particulary because both of you play silly little > semantic games). You aren't starting off so well with your Adult response. > The DK effect is a cognitive bias which is why I used 3 categories > to explain the type of responses that you, Diesel, Snit, nospam, > etc., exhibit. I don't think you're really in a position to make such statements concerning any of the people on your list. Armchair usenet psy isn't new Arlen. I hope you won't be trying to take credit for it. > o People with low abilities tend to overestimate their abilities > o And they tend to overestimate what it takes for others to attain > their level of ability I haven't over estimated my abilities Arlen. I have the paperwork and easily google track records to verify it. > On the right side of actual skills: > o People with high abilities tend to underestimate their abilities > o And they tend to underestimate what it takes for others to > attain their level of ability Guilty as charged. I'm a terrible teacher, so I've been told, numerous times. I don't have the patience for it. Based on your own criteria, you fall far to the left hand side, so far left infact, you risk bending the needle if it were a gauge. > It turns out, Cybe R Wizard, it's impossible to talk to you, as if > you are an adult. I just don't have the skill set required to drop > down to your level. Rise upto his level. It's okay, typos happen. > I apologize. I just can't drop to your level and cover every > semantic game your tiny little childish brain can come up with. I > just can't. Oh, let's be fair Arlen. You can't even get an IDE for programming an Android device up and running without extensive hand holding help, youtube videos and a pile of googling. That doesn't exactly speak praises for your own mental capabilities, or, properly stated, limitations. > o Diesel, Dustin Cook, and a host of other nyms Back to your gullible comment I referenced earlier. This is an example of it. I have ONE nym and one real name. Contrary to what the Anoncoward states, multiple times, with nothing to back it up, I'm not Char Jackson or any of the other posters its claimed I am on more than one occasion, and despite it's claims, I've never posted to usenet via a remailer or a series of them. I don't have ANY socks in the digital sense. Had I not done laundry last night, I'd have no socks in the literal sense today. lol. And, prior to Anoncoward doing their best to list all of the handles I've used since my lifetime, you knew nothing about any of them, because despite your claims, we have not known each other for decades on usenet. I wouldn't have forgotten someone like you. You're far too fucked up in the head, much like David Brooks for me to have forgotten you. For someone as hungup on proof as you claim, One would think the last thing you'd take without a single shred of proof would be anything posted by someone who feels it necessary to hide behind one or more remailers. Instead, you show that proof is a term you use extensively, but don't actually know the words meaning. Your quoted words above, along with others quite similiar to them is actual proof in the real sense of that, along with your extreme gullibility. Two for one. heh. -- 'YOU NAAAAASTY MAN!' - Joe Penner
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 07:09 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <20190125070929.6850fa73@WizardsTower> |
| In reply to | #53037 |
On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 06:32:56 -0000 (UTC) arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> wrote: Some more stupid lies that no one reads. <YAWN> TL;DR I seldom give any weight to the words of known liars and you, sir, are a liar as: Message-ID: <po4626$vpu$1@news.mixmin.net> Clearly shows. To attempt to prove otherwise is not only futile, it is an evil fool's game. Cybe R. Wizard -- It is a man's own mind, not his enemy or foe, that lures him to evil ways. Buddha
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 14:38 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q2f71g$14e$3@news.mixmin.net> |
| In reply to | #53044 |
On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 07:09:56 -0600, Cybe R. Wizard wrote: > Some more stupid lies that no one reads. *Yet again, Cybe(r) Wizard, nothing ever comes out of you of adult value.* In fact, it's lost on you the _only_ people you _can_ communicate on the same level appear to be a particularly illustrious bunch of similar drivel: o Jasen Betts, o Dan Purgert, o Diesel, o Rene Lamontagne, o Wolf K o & Jolly Roger. These half-dozen childish drivel communicate well with each other. I wonder if you even _comprehend_ why you & they understand each other? HINT: Kids play well together, even when their games are childishly silly.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 09:49 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <tmF2E.94550$5h3.1019@fx09.iad> |
| In reply to | #53049 |
On 2019-01-25 09:38, arlen holder wrote: [...] > *Yet again, Cybe(r) Wizard, nothing ever comes out of you of adult value.* [...] I suppose you believe that this kind of chiding will have some effect, such as teaching us "children" to behave like "adults." If the above and similar insulting rants indicate how you think an adult behaves, then I'm glad you don't think I am one. -- Wolf K kirkwood40.blogspot.com People worry that computers will get too smart and take over the world, but the real problem is that they’re too stupid and they’ve already taken over the world (Pedro Domingos)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 17:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q2fhpn$ia6$6@news.mixmin.net> |
| In reply to | #53052 |
On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 09:49:59 -0500, Wolf K wrote: > I suppose you believe that this kind of chiding will have some effect, > such as teaching us "children" to behave like "adults." > > If the above and similar insulting rants indicate how you think an adult > behaves, then I'm glad you don't think I am one. Thank you Wolf K for proving my point. o Yet again, Wolf K, you _completely_ miscomprehend my strategy & tactics. What's sad is that even when I _explained_ them, in detail, you still miscomprehend my strategy & tactics. It's shocking, actually, that people like you actually exist. 1. Either you're really _that_ incredibly stupid, Wolf K., or 2. You're just incessantly playing silly childish games, Wolf K, or, 3. You really do _believe_ you understood my strategy & tactics. HINT: 1. My strategy is to get technical answers (I'm not a chit chat poster). 2. My tactics are twofold - only one of which applies to you: a. For the adults, I respond as a logical adult would respond. b. For the children, I respond to make it "less fun" for you, Wolf K. That you _think_ you comprehend my strategy, and yet, you _prove_ you don't comprehend a _single_ word I just said, Wolf K, merely helps me comprehend how your mind works. That is... o No amount of facts _can_ convince you that the lemon juice doesn't work. Why? o Because you can't possibly comprehend that you never comprehend. That! Is my epiphany! You are very likely so left-side DK, that you can't comprehend anything. o I don't need to prove that. o You prove it for me. *In fact, each of you below proves me right in every one of your post!* o Alan Baker o Alan Browne o BK at OnRamp, o Char Jackson o Dan Purgert o Diesel o Dustin Cook o Good Guy o Hemidactylus o Jasen Betts o John Doe o Jolly Roger o Lloyd, o Rene Lamantagne o Rene Lamontagne o Rudy Weiser o Savageduck o Tim Streater o Wade Garrett o Wolf K o Your Name o et al.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.os.linux
csiph-web