Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.os.linux > #52729 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Diesel <me@privacy.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-01-17 23:14 +0000 |
| Last post | 2019-01-28 15:27 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 159 — 17 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.os.linux
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-17 23:14 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-18 00:12 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-18 00:58 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-17 19:29 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-18 06:27 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-18 02:00 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-18 02:08 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-18 14:29 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-23 03:49 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-23 11:22 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-28 05:29 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-28 13:45 +0000
NF -- Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-04 03:59 +0000
NF -- Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-15 04:31 +0000
Re: NF -- Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-15 11:26 +0000
Re: NF -- Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-16 04:51 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-01-20 20:55 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-20 16:02 -0500
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-01-23 01:14 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-23 03:49 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-23 11:34 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-01-23 19:23 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-23 20:24 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-28 05:30 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-01-28 19:16 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-30 04:32 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-01-30 05:18 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-03 02:14 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-23 00:32 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-01-23 20:41 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-23 20:49 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-23 15:46 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-23 15:38 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2019-01-23 15:50 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-23 15:59 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-23 22:06 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-23 16:09 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-24 00:07 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-23 18:27 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2019-01-23 19:16 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-24 02:00 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-23 20:58 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-23 21:11 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-01-24 07:50 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-01-24 07:56 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-24 02:34 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-24 11:54 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-24 07:51 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-24 02:49 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-24 13:39 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-24 08:19 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-01-24 06:10 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid> - 2019-01-25 09:14 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-01-25 17:42 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-24 00:02 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-23 19:30 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-24 02:14 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-24 15:54 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-24 16:41 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-24 23:08 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-24 23:37 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-01-25 06:11 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-25 07:04 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-25 16:48 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-28 05:31 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-28 13:33 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-28 08:23 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-28 15:43 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-30 04:32 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-30 04:32 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-29 22:41 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-30 12:34 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-30 04:32 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-30 12:26 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-01-26 03:56 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-28 05:31 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-25 07:09 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-01-25 14:38 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2019-01-25 09:49 -0500
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-01-25 17:42 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2019-01-25 10:07 -0800
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-25 16:51 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-28 05:31 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-28 05:31 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-25 16:23 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-01-25 22:43 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-25 17:18 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-25 15:21 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Wildman <best_lay@yahoo.com> - 2019-01-25 17:19 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-25 23:21 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-25 17:36 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-28 05:31 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-28 05:31 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <XxuB8T967dUpoKQ8.R9P892p5GIKabIS11TMpG7N8dpaGh90cjaXByxpT@dont-email.me> - 2019-01-20 22:09 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-25 07:14 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-01-25 14:38 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2019-01-25 16:34 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2019-01-25 11:49 -0500
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-25 16:02 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-01-25 22:41 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-25 17:14 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-25 16:08 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-25 16:11 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-25 16:17 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-25 15:16 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-01-25 20:41 +0100
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-01-27 02:02 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid> - 2019-02-15 19:15 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-28 05:31 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-28 15:21 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-30 04:32 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-30 12:25 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-03 02:14 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-03 02:31 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-03 23:26 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-21 04:51 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-01-18 04:18 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-18 06:27 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-18 15:01 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-18 09:27 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-21 04:51 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-20 23:56 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-23 03:49 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-21 12:11 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-23 03:49 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-23 01:27 -0600
OT: .sig. Was:Re: I just belatedly realized and on and on and on... "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-23 01:34 -0600
Re: OT: .sig. Was:Re: I just belatedly realized and on and on and on... Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2019-01-23 03:39 -0500
Re: OT: .sig. Was:Re: I just belatedly realized and on and on and on... "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-23 03:04 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-01-23 09:05 +0100
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-23 02:25 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-01-23 10:30 +0100
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-23 03:40 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-28 05:30 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-28 01:33 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-28 05:30 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-01-28 11:50 +0100
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-30 04:32 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-01-30 05:24 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-03 02:14 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-02-03 08:08 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-03 23:26 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-02-04 05:45 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-08 07:33 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-01-30 09:04 +0100
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-03 02:14 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-28 05:30 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-23 12:18 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-28 05:31 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-28 15:13 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-04 03:59 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-25 07:17 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-01-25 14:38 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-28 05:30 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-25 14:49 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-27 20:36 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-28 05:30 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-28 05:31 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-28 15:27 +0000
Page 5 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 Next page →
| From | Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 10:07 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <q2fj8v$1kk1$6@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #53063 |
On 2019-01-25 9:42 a.m., arlen holder wrote: > On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 09:49:59 -0500, Wolf K wrote: > >> I suppose you believe that this kind of chiding will have some effect, >> such as teaching us "children" to behave like "adults." >> >> If the above and similar insulting rants indicate how you think an adult >> behaves, then I'm glad you don't think I am one. > > Thank you Wolf K for proving my point. > o Yet again, Wolf K, you _completely_ miscomprehend my strategy & tactics. > > What's sad is that even when I _explained_ them, in detail, you still > miscomprehend my strategy & tactics. > > It's shocking, actually, that people like you actually exist. > 1. Either you're really _that_ incredibly stupid, Wolf K., or > 2. You're just incessantly playing silly childish games, Wolf K, or, > 3. You really do _believe_ you understood my strategy & tactics. > > HINT: > 1. My strategy is to get technical answers (I'm not a chit chat poster). That's a lie. > 2. My tactics are twofold - only one of which applies to you: > a. For the adults, I respond as a logical adult would respond. That's a lie. > b. For the children, I respond to make it "less fun" for you, Wolf K. And that's a lie. :-)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 16:51 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <20190125165110.1866cb45@WizardsTower> |
| In reply to | #53065 |
On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 18:58:23 -0000 (UTC) arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> wrote: > The reason you only see me treating you as a child, should be obvious. Good grief. LEARN SOME GRAMMAR! Cybe R. Wizard -- My other computer is a HOLMES IV
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Diesel <me@privacy.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-28 05:31 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA9E55DE4DF59HT1@u0ECeNR06M8rvC48OAE0PoWATk.R71Y3.1XH5k> |
| In reply to | #53065 |
Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> news:q2fj8v$1kk1$6@gioia.aioe.org Fri, 25 Jan 2019 18:07:29 GMT in alt.os.linux, wrote: > On 2019-01-25 9:42 a.m., arlen holder wrote: >> On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 09:49:59 -0500, Wolf K wrote: >> >>> I suppose you believe that this kind of chiding will have some >>> effect, such as teaching us "children" to behave like "adults." >>> >>> If the above and similar insulting rants indicate how you think >>> an adult behaves, then I'm glad you don't think I am one. >> >> Thank you Wolf K for proving my point. >> o Yet again, Wolf K, you _completely_ miscomprehend my strategy & >> tactics. >> >> What's sad is that even when I _explained_ them, in detail, you >> still miscomprehend my strategy & tactics. >> >> It's shocking, actually, that people like you actually exist. >> 1. Either you're really _that_ incredibly stupid, Wolf K., or >> 2. You're just incessantly playing silly childish games, Wolf K, >> or, 3. You really do _believe_ you understood my strategy & >> tactics. >> >> HINT: >> 1. My strategy is to get technical answers (I'm not a chit chat >> poster). > > That's a lie. Not totally. They do try to get technical answers in the form of step by step instructions written for a clueless idiot. Which they'll happily take full credit for in an upcoming spammy tutorial. :) >> 2. My tactics are twofold - only one of which applies to you: >> a. For the adults, I respond as a logical adult would respond. > > That's a lie. True. >> b. For the children, I respond to make it "less fun" for you, >> Wolf K. > > And that's a lie. > >:-) True again. -- 'If Jiminy Cricket was here, I'd skoosh him.' -- Calvin
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Diesel <me@privacy.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-28 05:31 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA9E55DDCEDBEHT1@u0ECeNR06M8rvC48OAE0PoWATk.R71Y3.1XH5k> |
| In reply to | #53052 |
Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> news:tmF2E.94550$5h3.1019@fx09.iad Fri, 25 Jan 2019 14:49:59 GMT in alt.os.linux, wrote: > On 2019-01-25 09:38, arlen holder wrote: > [...] >> *Yet again, Cybe(r) Wizard, nothing ever comes out of you of >> adult value.* > [...] > > I suppose you believe that this kind of chiding will have some > effect, such as teaching us "children" to behave like "adults." > > If the above and similar insulting rants indicate how you think an > adult behaves, then I'm glad you don't think I am one. > I don't know of any actual adults, besides the Anoncoward who displays that style of thought processing, or anything else. Arlen is in good company there. :) -- And he disappeared in a puff of logic.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 16:23 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <20190125162357.6dffa597@WizardsTower> |
| In reply to | #53049 |
On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 14:38:42 -0000 (UTC) arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> wrote: > *Yet again, Cybe(r) Wizard, nothing ever comes out of you of adult > value.* The recognition and outing of liars is of great, nay, tremendous value. Otherwise you wouldn't be spending so much on you time trying to weasel out of the fact that you are now a well-known liar because of: Message-ID: <po4626$vpu$1@news.mixmin.net> in which you claim to have written TEN THOUSAND tutorials. Cybe R. Wizard -will not stop until you admit that you are a liar -- "No. There is no balance, and no retribution, and no rules. The rules and balances you blather about are hopeful creations of a man fearing..." Dave Eggers
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 22:43 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q2g3eh$hr7$1@news.mixmin.net> |
| In reply to | #53078 |
On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 16:23:57 -0600, Cybe R. Wizard wrote: > Cybe R. Wizard -will not stop until you admit that you are a liar Hi Cybe(r) Wizard, Notwithstanding the fact that _one_ tutorial, is far more than you've contributed, what's amazing is your complete & utter lack of comprehension. No amount of fact will ever get through to your left-side DK brain. o You actually _believe_ you know how the lemon-juice trick works. o That is, you can't comprehend that you can't comprehend what I had said. That you don't comprehend what I said, is stellar for Left Dunning-Kruger. o Absolutely no amount of logic are you capable of comprehending. o You claim the lemon-juice trick works - despite not comprehending it. To wit, you don't even _comprehend_ what I claimed. o Far worse ... sadly ... you can't comprehend that you can't comprehend. You prove me correct in _every_ repetition of your lack of comprehension.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 17:18 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <20190125171808.14fa3bec@WizardsTower> |
| In reply to | #53081 |
On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 22:43:41 -0000 (UTC) arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> wrote: > On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 16:23:57 -0600, Cybe R. Wizard wrote: > > > Cybe R. Wizard -will not stop until you admit that you are a liar > > Hi Cybe(r) Wizard, As you have again failed to be honest with and about yourself, TL;DR. Waste all the time you wish writing these huge denials of the truth. The truth is both simple and right here: Message-ID: <po4626$vpu$1@news.mixmin.net> where you lie about having written TEN THOUSAND tutorials. Cybe R. Wizard -- A liar is always lavish of oaths. Pierre Corneille
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 15:21 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <gb0nr6Fnqv7U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #53037 |
Cybe R. Wizard <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> wrote: > On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 15:54:43 -0600 > "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> wrote: > >> The Dunning/Kruger effect is just that, a psychological EFFECT which >> is not graphed or even graph-able. > > Such proves not to be the case: > https://graphpaperdiaries.com/2017/08/20/the-real-dunning-kruger-graph/ Nice. Thanks for the link. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wildman <best_lay@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 17:19 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <p5OdnWxgbarlBNbBnZ2dnUU7-eOdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #53055 |
On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 19:29:16 +0000, arlen holder wrote: > On 25 Jan 2019 15:21:10 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote: > >>> Such proves not to be the case: >>> https://graphpaperdiaries.com/2017/08/20/the-real-dunning-kruger-graph/ >> >> Nice. Thanks for the link. > > None of you appear to even _comprehend_ what the DK effect entails. > <https://graphpaperdiaries.files.wordpress.com/2017/08/humorgraph.png> > > Nor why I say the lot of you clearly belong on the far left side. > <https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-1m78dz-Eamo/WS9_rqu7ifI/AAAAAAAAEY0/4OWYfWVWrwAvhsexPVJQLEHmCnxwi9L_QCLcB/s1600/mt-stupid.png> > > Each one of you proves you can't comprehend even the _simplest_ of facts: > <https://realizebeauty.files.wordpress.com/2018/08/dunning-kruger-effect-agile-coffee-web.jpg> > > Everyone listed below, is _clearly_ situated to the left of "Mount Stupid": > <https://understandinginnovation.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/dunning-kruger-0011.jpg> > o Alan Baker > o Alan Browne > o BK at OnRamp > o Char Jackson > o Chris > o Cybe R Wizard > o Dan Purgert > o Diesel > o Dustin Cook > o Good Guy > o Hemidactylus > o Jasen Betts > o joe > o John Doe > o John Hasler > o Jolly Roger > o Lloyd > o nospam > o Rene Lamantagne > o Rene Lamontagne > o Rudy Weiser > o Savageduck > o Tim Streater > o Wade Garrett > o Wolf K > o Your Name > o et al. I am deeply disappointed that I did not make the list. I am likely the most stupid guy on usenet. -- <Wildman> GNU/Linux user #557453 The cow died so I don't need your bull!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 23:21 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnq4n6fp.3u3.dan@xps-linux.djph.net> |
| In reply to | #53087 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Wildman wrote: > I am deeply disappointed that I did not make the list. I am > likely the most stupid guy on usenet. > I'm pretty sure arlen will be around shortly to dispute that. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEBcqaUD8uEzVNxUrujhHd8xJ5ooEFAlxLmfkACgkQjhHd8xJ5 ooHo4Qf+LF43W3OZgud2f+PIA2ZdegyN35KMHcZmuspVlYFNPwNpC75Czu8ncsZB 1ntWdkwjjKwLlPrrCTUOKistLDqFYbz6bIw1zBboPxy6JDuBHR7uD28Dj3EmD3Tt t5cIB+8M2/8y004JICHh/u48EFvuxIdjB9yW9VtgoYs5MKDiMRgkpT9BgNQhh3gv scJO+wvmt+Q3P/p4KMy1NzbVgjAbJWYUkXIaNvA1YRb7xcRO2+CmL9FSKKuEaFsn 6oJrMzZ2DUjVxvtWbBMSo1iV4vE0jFGdY+WPvxxb8txVFyzGEMg53P0KIYmY2Bgc 8Vt0/R7A4cFagTIYgGRvkZCArUYlyA== =RPDd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- |_|O|_| |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert |O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5 4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 17:36 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <20190125173644.2f07a5fe@WizardsTower> |
| In reply to | #53087 |
On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 17:19:20 -0600 Wildman <best_lay@yahoo.com> wrote: > On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 19:29:16 +0000, arlen holder wrote: > <snip Arlene Holdover's enemies list> > > I am deeply disappointed that I did not make the list. I am > likely the most stupid guy on usenet. > What? Have you not seen the posts from the poster to whom you replied? He gives anyone a run for the money as stupidest guy anywhere. Cybe R. Wizard -- “The liar's punishment is, not in the least that he is not believed, but that he cannot believe anyone else.” George Bernard Shaw
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Diesel <me@privacy.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-28 05:31 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA9E55DEC5356HT1@u0ECeNR06M8rvC48OAE0PoWATk.R71Y3.1XH5k> |
| In reply to | #53037 |
Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> news:gb0qk7FoekeU2 @mid.individual.net Fri, 25 Jan 2019 16:08:39 GMT in alt.os.linux, wrote: > Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> wrote: >> >> I don't want to be an adult yet, I'm *only* 85 > > Never grow up! 🤜🏻 > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJJ-ZLdrTwY -- Ignorance is temporary; Stupidity lasts forever!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Diesel <me@privacy.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-28 05:31 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA9E55DFD295CHT1@u0ECeNR06M8rvC48OAE0PoWATk.R71Y3.1XH5k> |
| In reply to | #53037 |
arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> news:q2eaim$irh$1@news.mixmin.net Fri, 25 Jan 2019 06:32:56 GMT in alt.os.linux, wrote: > I'm trying to comprehend _why_ people do what they prove to do. > o The question is a _serious_ question. You need to learn what the word comprehend means before you can do this, Arlen. Based on your own posts, it's quite clear you don't know the words actual meaning, but toss it around as if you did. > Bear in mind the goal is to _understand_ people like Snit, nospam, > Jolly Roger, Diesel, Dustin Cook, Char Jackson, Wolf K., Alan > Baker, Tim Streater, Alan Browne, Savageduck, Wade Garrett, BK at > OnRamp, Lloyd, Hemidactylus, Your Name, John Doe, Rene Lamantagne > Jasen Betts, Wolf K, Rudy Weiser, Good Guy, et al. Is there a particular reason you feel it necessary to use my posting handle as well as my first and last name? I realize you're a very gullible individual, but, that's no excuse for what you're doing. In fact, it disputes another claim of yours; that you've known me for decades on usenet. I always stated that was infact, a lie on your part. You recently learned my name (which isn't a secret) thanks to the anoncoward, along with some of my older handles. And, being the gullible usenet twit you are, took every single thing they wrote about me at face value, without question and without anything that could even be remotely close to the truth. Don't believe me? Good! Here's some examples of their lying: MID: <3d2a9cb78212435f8d0ca9a707c6ee5a@haph.org> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=153173161400 He is on probation for hosting the Melissa Virus. MID: <84cc91b8994db4a150e15155c499e0f5@hoi-polloi.org> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=153173179500 He lied about not hosting Melissa. So why believe this lying shittard when he says he was not put on probation for hosting viruses, including Melissa? His probation period is over, but he's been warned that if they EVER catch him doing the virus shit again, he's toast. His next conviction will result in prison time. http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=150749973600 MID: <84cc91b8994db4a150e15155c499e0f5@hoi-polloi.org> However, I do have a "friend" or two who are intimately (personally) familiar with the facts regarding his arrest and conviction. The(y) got him. Pure and simple, they got him. Pretty serious story there to be completely pulling from your asshole. Like you Arlen, they didn't think their claims could be checked for accuracy. They can. They have. Here you go: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melissa_(computer_virus) https://www.justice.gov/archive/criminal/cybercrime/press-releases/2002/melissaSent.htm You won't find my name mentioned anywhere at those urls, describing what happened, and who got busted for it. David (melissas author) was not charged for writing the virus (that wasn't and still isn't illegal) he was charged for malicious spreading, which he did and fully admitted to having done. Along with the hacking of the aol account he used to post it to usenet. Had he just written and released the virus on a pro vx site as I did mine, he would have been fine from a legal aspect. but, he didn't stop with that. He posted it disguised as something else to usenet; and that's where he crossed the line to outright illegal as fuck all. Unlike you Arlen, despite your claiming to do so, I did provide facts (proof) to backup everything I wrote in this reply. That is, you're a gullible liar, and! the remailer is a lying toadie. You make a good team now that I think about it. As, they ran out of suckers on the majority of newsgroups I haunt. Too many regulars who know me and some of my background also found holes in the remailers stories and the remailer never appreciated those holes being commented on, or brought to light for further analysis. The Anoncoward, as you have no choice now but to learn, is a well known liar and story teller. They can't find enough actual bad dirt on me, they have to go and make some up! Hows it feel knowing they took you for a ride? Are you even the least bit ashamed of further spreading bullshit about another poster? It's a rhetorical question, Arlen. I don't expect you to be able to answer it as any reasonable answer you provided would require you admitting you were wrong. Considering your well known inability to issue an apology when it's warranted, I don't expect to see you admitting you're wrong anytime soon, either. It's not within you. It's only available to those with a spine and backbone, and, let's call it for what it is. You clearly don't have either. I only provided all those facts and further details behind it to prove how gullible and what a liar you are. Wasn't hard, either. Not to shabby for someone who as you put it several times, has the mental capacity of a stupid child. if only you understood irony, Arlen. > All the people in the list (& more) _constantly_ exhibit this > trait: 1. Are they really that incredibly stupid (but who is > _that_ dumb?) 2. Are they simply always pulling our leg (but for > what gain?) 3. Or, do they actually _believe_ what they write? I'm not pulling anybodies leg. I'm always subject to peer review due to some rat bastard code I wrote, nearly two decades ago now; so it wouldn't benefit me in the least little bit to even try bullshitting you or anyone else. I'd be called out for it, and, rightfully so. > I believe _this_ well-known real-world example, is classic to > describe the kind of people I'm trying to comprehend, in this > case, Snit (along with Jolly Roger, nospam, and most of the > canonical Apple Apologists). As has been shown above, you and comprehension are not the best of friends. Hell, you aren't even on a first name basis with it. > SITUATION: > o I tested iOS and found it incapable of a certain feature. Umm, no. As much as I dislike iOS for my own personal reasons, you can't blame the OS for your own inability to do something with it. It's not the OS fault, that's entirely on you. > o I posted the facts to the iOS newsgroup You posted your unfounded opinion, derived from not only ignorance, but, an ego as well. Too proud to admit you were stuck to ask for help. Instead, you theorize (you'll probably need to use a dictionary to look that one up too) about why the iOS isn't doing what you're expecting. Naturally, due to your ego, it has to be the others in question, and nothing you're doing wrong. > It's all about _comprehension_ of facts. Yes, it is. How are you doing with comprehending that the Anoncoward tells alot of completely made up stories about me? And that you, took them all, hook line and sinker, without even a shred of proof to support anything they wrote? Do you need more examples besides it's arrested for the Melissa virus story? I can provide several more, if you'd like. Or, do you comprehend (heh) the point now? > (Note: This is just one example of what those on the list do!) > > What drives them to appear to be so incredibly stupid? So what is driving you then? Spill it. -- ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Diesel <XxuB8T967dUpoKQ8.R9P892p5GIKabIS11TMpG7N8dpaGh90cjaXByxpT@dont-email.me> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-20 22:09 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA9DDAF05083A1ARYWHHID28E8@tiM3M.m6o9fu8xr89l97AE0sk20s4yC1cygu36nA0R6> |
| In reply to | #52832 |
arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> news:q22n7l$9a5$1@news.mixmin.net Sun, 20 Jan 2019 20:55:18 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: > On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 06:27:21 -0000 (UTC), Diesel wrote: > >> He's very amusing at times with what he thinks are witty insults. > > Hi Diesel, > I have a strategy which is to use Usenet to get answers to tech > questions. (Yeah, crazy strategy ... I know ... many use Usenet > for their amusement.) You make some wild assumptions about what you think others do with usenet and a variety of other items you write nonsense about, Arlen... > My strategy is to share & cull & combine data to solve problems, > together. I use tactics to manage the threads where I ask those > technical questions. You belittle and insult those (like myself) who could be of benefit to you, in so far as correctly answering technical questions and presenting useful problem solving skills. There's no advantage for you to use childish insults towards so many, Arlen. > Two tactics I use consistently are to: > a. Mirror the implied intent of each post - regardless of prior > history b. Directly confront the cowardly bullies - of which you > are one Other than your childish attack towards myself, the rest of what you wrote doesn't make any sense, either. > The goal is for you to KNOW that I will do that. I don't much care, Arlen. > o I will simply let _you_ make a fool of yourself, Dustin. Okay. When do you plan to do that? > o By pointing out the very words that you post (they're always of > a child) Cite specific examples, please. > Bear in mind, Diesel, and those like you, Dustin. Diesel is fine. We haven't reached a first name basis just yet. > o While there is no love lost between us - I don't care about you. This personal feeling you've expressed has what to do with the thread? > o I just want you to act like an adult when posting to threads I > care about I've yet not to do so, Arlen. Have you ever thought (perish the thought) that your own attitude might be the problem? > Simple. Consistent. > o A strategy to work a thread so that technical answers result. > o Tactics that fit that strategy and that deter childish bullies > like you. I do assist in technical threads. You can find thousands where I've done so. I choose not to give you easy answers to your questions, specifically. That's not being a bully Arlen. It's a personal choice that I'm free to make. > After having said that, you now know my strategy & tactics Diesel. > o Some bullies, like Char Jackson & Snit & Wolf K insists on their > rights o They, like Alan Baker & Jason Betts insist on a God-given > right to Troll. Arlen, I don't know any of those people as bullies. Or trolls. > At times, even I must deviate from my tactics and respond to them > that o This is my last response to you in this thread (to save > everyone else). I don't care if you respond or not. > Much to everyone's pleasure, Diesel, I say that now to you, > Dustin. My name isn't exactly new information Arlen. Although, it's common practice to address the poster by the posting nym, not their name. I realize that along with childish insult efforts, you'll resort to being an outright disrespectful prick as well. That's most likely because I've already seen (as have you) several posts from others who've already told you that I am (as I told you originally) one of the people who lurk here who could actually provide you the information you wanted concerning those drive letter mappings... My refusal to do so, especially after a little confirmation could be an annoying thing for you. Maybe you'll reconsider coming off as such an asshole right away in the future when you interact with someone you don't know? > Hence, it matters not to me whether you post as Casio, Diesel, > Diesel-Dum, Dustin Cook, Gremlin, Raid, Slam, et al. ROFL. Didn't post to usenet as Casio. Was a very short lived handle. Needed something else to sign a particular piece of code with...Happened to be wearing a casio watch - done deal. rofl. True story, too. > You love to dox people, Diesel, just as David Brooks & Aardvark > do. You doxed David Eagle & Jenn Porter for example. > You're' no different than Steve Carroll (aka David Brooks & maybe > Good Guy). Not true. David Eagle, Jenn Porter, AND, David Brooks came after me FIRST. I just so happen to be a much fucking better shot, is all. I don't recall Aardvark ever doxing anyone. > You wrote "virus families" as a vxer, disseminating them in the > wild. You even hosted a web site related to those efforts. I've been writing functional code (that is, not stupid hello world bullshit like you) since I was still single digit age. You know a very small amount about my coding time. And what little you've learned about me certainly doesn't support your earlier claims of me being stupid. All my code is original, none was written with a hand holding gui or online tutorial. I spent a very small amount of time all things considering writing self replicating programs (viruses) and worms, Arlen. I'd been writing code for years prior to that. > *Let me tell you a secret, Dustin. Let me save you alot more trouble down the road with me, hopefully. I've used a variety of analog (and later digital, lol) scopes, meters, etc, to map out electronic and electrical circuits. I've been doing that stuff since I was single digit age. I don't think I was even five years old yet when I got my first soldering iron. I started out reverse engineering electronic circuits. I took that mindset to computers, at a single digit age. I Never quit doing it. Getting a better picture now? > In the chit-chat model, who you are may be important because > in general, you say nothing in every post. Yet, for saying nothing, I'm sometimes accused of being too techie; please dumb it down further. [g] You are so fully of shit Arlen. You remind me of the anoncoward. It would tell bullshit that was easy to prove as being bullshit, just like you're doing now... > I don't care if you posted as God herself - if you simply answer a > question. I do, many times. Accurate and useful answers at that. >> Watching him publish hello world programs as he went through >> online tutorials for programming Android devices was hilarious >> from my point of view; that being, decades of actual programming >> experience on a wide variety of platforms. Not scripts, but, >> actual programs that worked as intended, from scratch. No hand >> holding GUI, etc. > > Hi Dustin, > > I know you consider yourself a genius for having disseminated > viruses. Where did you ever get that stupid idea? I've apologized many times over the years and 0wned the mistake of having written those programs, nearly twenty years ago now. > The problem, Diesel, is that you see me disseminating Hello World > programs, and you _think_ you can do better (which, maybe you > can). Maybe? :) Just a couple of additional examples where I have continued to do so, for decades. 1) http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk/core/ 2) http://bughunter.it-mate.co.uk You just wrote material above, complaining about a few programs I wrote. And let's admit it, they're a bit more complicated to write than anything you've published. And that was nearly twenty years ago. BugHunter wasn't exactly childsplay to write, the real challenges with that project was the reverse engineering of malware samples. That being said, it's a bit more complicated than anything you ever published. > Nobody on this planet (but you) thinks disseminating a cut and > paste "Hello World" is a stroke of genius. Nobody. > Well, nobody but you. You're not being logical, again. It's clear by what little you know of my coding background as well as the two urls above that I don't consider your efforts to be genius grade. rofl. > HINT: I always try to enable others to cut-&-paste what I can do > (and I never claim to be a genius - I just claim to be at least > average). The problem you have is that you aren't even Average. You're a childish old man, with according to new released information concerning how states rank with education; most likely isn't quite as educated as they let us on to think. Otherwise, many of the issues you present with you'd be able to solve entirely on your own, without the need for the tribe to hold your hand. -- It's a backup server. Email if in doubt about authenticity. Middle age is when you know your way around but don't feel like going!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 07:14 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <20190125071413.563b3960@WizardsTower> |
| In reply to | #52836 |
On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 07:11:31 -0000 (UTC) arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> wrote: > Whom am I talking about who _never_ adds on-topic technical value? > o Snit, nospam, Jolly Roger, Dan Purgert, Cybe R Wizard, Char > Jackson, o Wolf K., Alan Baker, Tim Streater, Alan Browne, > Savageduck, Wade Garrett, o BK at OnRamp, Lloyd, Hemidactylus, Your > Name, John Doe, Rene Lamantagne o Jasen Betts, Wolf K, Rudy Weiser, > Good Guy, Diesel, et al. Oh, look, it has an enemies list just as most evil lying semi-men do. Cybe R. Wizard -happyily opposing evil wannabe-men -- A good man would prefer to be defeated than to defeat injustice by evil means. Sallust
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 14:38 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q2f71d$14e$2@news.mixmin.net> |
| In reply to | #53045 |
On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 07:14:36 -0600, Cybe R. Wizard wrote: > Oh, look, it has an enemies list just as most evil lying semi-men do. Yet again, Cybe(r) Wizard, you prove to miscomprehend adult concepts. Let me ask the *adults* on this newsgroup *how* to respond to that? 1. Either Cybe is _incredibly_ stupid (but nobody is _that_ stupid), or, 2. Cybe is just playing silly childish semantic games (for what gain?), 3. Or, Cybe lacks comprehension of even the simplest of things. *How does an adult even _respond_ to people like Cybe?* A. Nobody can be _that_ incredibly stupid as what he writes indicates he is. B. Yet, what gain would he attain by purposefully acting _that_ stupid? C. Is it simply that there is absolutely no response he can comprehend? The question is important for the main reason that I ask Q&A questions. o People like Cybe prove to be (see list below) infest those Q&A threads. o Both ignoring & respondin gto them detracts from attaining an answer. o Yet, only they communicate amongst themselves in ways _they_ comprehend. Sure, my tactic of making it "less fun" for them is my main approach. o Where, I ignore drivel in chit-chat threads that other people post o But ignoring them in Q&A threads defeats the point of the Q&A Hence, one needs to _respond_ to these type of people (somehow): o Snit, nospam, Jolly Roger, Dan Purgert, Cybe R Wizard, Char Jackson, o Wolf K., Alan Baker, Tim Streater, Alan Browne, Savageduck, Wade Garrett, o BK at OnRamp, Lloyd, Hemidactylus, Your Name, John Doe, Rene Lamantagne o Jasen Betts, Wolf K, Rudy Weiser, Good Guy, Diesel, "joe", et al. But how? The fact is: A. They prove to be incredibly stupid - so facts can't ever work with them; B. They prove to own the mind of a child - so admonishment won't work; C. They prove to not even _comprehend_ that they don't understand anything. How then, does one get these utterly worthless posters to "just go away"?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 16:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q2fdq6$6uc$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #53048 |
On 2019-01-25, arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> wrote: ... > > How then, does one get these utterly worthless posters to "just go away"? You know, in this thread we have all been wondering that.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 11:49 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <H6H2E.24834$E44.279@fx28.iad> |
| In reply to | #53058 |
On 2019-01-25 11:34, William Unruh wrote: > On 2019-01-25, arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> wrote: > ... >> >> How then, does one get these utterly worthless posters to "just go away"? > > You know, in this thread we have all been wondering that. > Arlen doesn't get irony. But as one of those worthless posters, I will abandon this thread. It's been fun while it lasted. -- Wolf K kirkwood40.blogspot.com People worry that computers will get too smart and take over the world, but the real problem is that they’re too stupid and they’ve already taken over the world (Pedro Domingos)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 16:02 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <20190125160206.6d9f6d66@WizardsTower> |
| In reply to | #53048 |
On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 14:38:39 -0000 (UTC) arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> wrote: > On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 07:14:36 -0600, Cybe R. Wizard wrote: > > > Oh, look, it has an enemies list just as most evil lying semi-men > > do. > > Yet again, Cybe(r) Wizard, you prove to miscomprehend adult concepts. > > Let me ask the *adults* on this newsgroup *how* to respond to that? > 1. Either Cybe is _incredibly_ stupid (but nobody is _that_ stupid), > or, 2. Cybe is just playing silly childish semantic games (for what > gain?), 3. Or, Cybe lacks comprehension of even the simplest of > things. > > *How does an adult even _respond_ to people like Cybe?* You are a liar. A /KNOWN/ liar. Known by /ALL/ to be such. First, a /REAL/ adult, one who is a true human with honorable intent, would admit to having told the obvious lies that you've told such as the one found in: Message-ID: <po4626$vpu$1@news.mixmin.net> in which you make the pompous claim of having written TEN THOUSAND tutorials. Everyone already knows that to be both false and told with the intent of bolstering your own questionable abilities with software. IOW, you are a liar. A /KNOWN/ liar. Known by /ALL/ to be such. Second, that adult would know better than to equate anyone to some very dubious idea of yours that children are somehow either stupid or incapable of learning. Neither is true, BTW, making your stating of it another lie. IOW, you are a liar. A /KNOWN/ liar. Known by /ALL/ to be such. The fact that you believe it shows either that you intentionally mis-characterize both children and other adults who disagree with you or that you neither have nor cherish children. That by itself makes you sub-human in my book. Oh, and a liar. A /KNOWN/ liar. Known by /ALL/ to be such. Third, it is no semantic game to show you to be a liar using YOUR OWN WORDS. To question that is showing once again how much of a true and constant and consistent liar you are. The semantic games which you say I play are either the showing of you to be a liar (as in Message-ID: <po4626$vpu$1@news.mixmin.net>) or possibly the 'game' wherein I show you your own extremely poor usage of English-ized Latin or your quite questionable knowledge and use of basic English grammar. IOW, you are a liar. A /KNOWN/ liar. Known by /ALL/ to be such. Having now shown conclusively that: 1. Cybe is /NOT/ _incredibly_ stupid and that: 2. Cybe is /NOT/ just playing silly childish semantic games, and additionally that: 3. Cybe /DOES NOT/ lack comprehension of even the simplest of things such as simnple liars like you (just as a for instance) we await your usual sidestepping, obfuscation, or ignoring (is the act of ignoring known as ignorance?) of obvious facts known (now) by almost everybody. IOW, you are a liar. A /KNOWN/ liar. Known by /ALL/ to be such. Keep on digging; the hole is almost deep enough to bury yourself forever as a known liar who most will have better sense that to trust. IOW, you are a liar. A /KNOWN/ liar. Known by /ALL/ to be such. You really are a pathetic little weasel of a pitifully inept man, aren't you? Cybe R. Wizard -thinks you to be a liar, too, but a poor one -- “Whoever is careless with the truth in small matters cannot be trusted with important matters.” Albert Einstein
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-25 22:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q2g3ac$hob$1@news.mixmin.net> |
| In reply to | #53074 |
On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 16:02:06 -0600, Cybe R. Wizard wrote: > First, a /REAL/ adult, one who is a true human with honorable intent, > would admit to having told the obvious lies that you've told such as > the one found in: Hi Cybe(r) Wizard, Notwithstanding the fact that _one_ tutorial, is far more than you've contributed, what's amazing is your complete & utter lack of comprehension. No amount of fact will ever get through to your left-side DK brain. o You actually _believe_ you know how the lemon-juice trick works. o That is, you can't comprehend that you can't comprehend what I had said. That you don't comprehend what I said, is stellar for Left Dunning-Kruger. o Absolutely no amount of logic are you capable of comprehending. o You claim the lemon-juice trick works - despite not comprehending it. To wit, you don't even _comprehend_ what I claimed. o Far worse ... sadly ... you can't comprehend that you can't comprehend. You prove me correct in _every_ repetition of your lack of comprehension.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.os.linux
csiph-web