Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.os.linux > #52729 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Diesel <me@privacy.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-01-17 23:14 +0000 |
| Last post | 2019-01-28 15:27 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 159 — 17 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.os.linux
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-17 23:14 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-18 00:12 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-18 00:58 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-17 19:29 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-18 06:27 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-18 02:00 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-18 02:08 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-18 14:29 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-23 03:49 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-23 11:22 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-28 05:29 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-28 13:45 +0000
NF -- Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-04 03:59 +0000
NF -- Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-15 04:31 +0000
Re: NF -- Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-15 11:26 +0000
Re: NF -- Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-16 04:51 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-01-20 20:55 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-20 16:02 -0500
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-01-23 01:14 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-23 03:49 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-23 11:34 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-01-23 19:23 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-23 20:24 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-28 05:30 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-01-28 19:16 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-30 04:32 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-01-30 05:18 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-03 02:14 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-23 00:32 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-01-23 20:41 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-23 20:49 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-23 15:46 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-23 15:38 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2019-01-23 15:50 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-23 15:59 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-23 22:06 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-23 16:09 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-24 00:07 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-23 18:27 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2019-01-23 19:16 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-24 02:00 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-23 20:58 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-23 21:11 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-01-24 07:50 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-01-24 07:56 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-24 02:34 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-24 11:54 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-24 07:51 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-24 02:49 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-24 13:39 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-24 08:19 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-01-24 06:10 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid> - 2019-01-25 09:14 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-01-25 17:42 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-24 00:02 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-23 19:30 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-24 02:14 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-24 15:54 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-24 16:41 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-24 23:08 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-24 23:37 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-01-25 06:11 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-25 07:04 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-25 16:48 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-28 05:31 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-28 13:33 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-28 08:23 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-28 15:43 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-30 04:32 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-30 04:32 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-29 22:41 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-30 12:34 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-30 04:32 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-30 12:26 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-01-26 03:56 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-28 05:31 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-25 07:09 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-01-25 14:38 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2019-01-25 09:49 -0500
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-01-25 17:42 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Alan Baker <nunya@ness.biz> - 2019-01-25 10:07 -0800
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-25 16:51 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-28 05:31 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-28 05:31 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-25 16:23 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-01-25 22:43 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-25 17:18 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-25 15:21 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Wildman <best_lay@yahoo.com> - 2019-01-25 17:19 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-25 23:21 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-25 17:36 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-28 05:31 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-28 05:31 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <XxuB8T967dUpoKQ8.R9P892p5GIKabIS11TMpG7N8dpaGh90cjaXByxpT@dont-email.me> - 2019-01-20 22:09 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-25 07:14 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-01-25 14:38 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2019-01-25 16:34 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2019-01-25 11:49 -0500
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-25 16:02 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-01-25 22:41 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-25 17:14 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-25 16:08 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-25 16:11 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-25 16:17 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2019-01-25 15:16 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-01-25 20:41 +0100
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-01-27 02:02 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid> - 2019-02-15 19:15 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-28 05:31 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-28 15:21 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-30 04:32 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-30 12:25 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-03 02:14 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-02-03 02:31 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-03 23:26 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-21 04:51 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-01-18 04:18 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-18 06:27 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-18 15:01 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-18 09:27 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-21 04:51 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-20 23:56 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-23 03:49 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-21 12:11 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-23 03:49 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-23 01:27 -0600
OT: .sig. Was:Re: I just belatedly realized and on and on and on... "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-23 01:34 -0600
Re: OT: .sig. Was:Re: I just belatedly realized and on and on and on... Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2019-01-23 03:39 -0500
Re: OT: .sig. Was:Re: I just belatedly realized and on and on and on... "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-23 03:04 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-01-23 09:05 +0100
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-23 02:25 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-01-23 10:30 +0100
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-23 03:40 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-28 05:30 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-28 01:33 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-28 05:30 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-01-28 11:50 +0100
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-30 04:32 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-01-30 05:24 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-03 02:14 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-02-03 08:08 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-03 23:26 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2019-02-04 05:45 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <nobody@haph.org> - 2019-02-08 07:33 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-01-30 09:04 +0100
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-03 02:14 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-28 05:30 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-23 12:18 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-28 05:31 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-28 15:13 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-02-04 03:59 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-25 07:17 -0600
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-01-25 14:38 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-28 05:30 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-25 14:49 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-27 20:36 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-28 05:30 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-28 05:31 +0000
Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-28 15:27 +0000
Page 2 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next page →
| From | Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-23 11:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnq4gka2.97b.dan@xps-linux.djph.net> |
| In reply to | #52938 |
Diesel wrote: > [...] > You may infact just suffer from stubborn ignorance. It's a curable > condition as well, just takes a bit longer. And possibly a clue-by-four. > These long posts of yours, attacking various posters, doesn't serve > you any useful purpose. Time is better spent continuing with your Serves to give us more chances for having side conversations, such as the one concerning microcontrollers. > [...] You need to remember, communication via usenet wasn't intended > to be for real time purposes. if you want that, pick up the phone or > something. Speaking of, did you see that "deltachat" program? Seems they're wanting to do IM over SMTP... -- |_|O|_| Registered Linux user #585947 |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert |O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5 4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-23 19:23 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q2af07$3fi$1@gonzo.alcatraz> |
| In reply to | #52957 |
On 2019-01-23, Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> wrote: > Diesel wrote: >> [...] >> You may infact just suffer from stubborn ignorance. It's a curable >> condition as well, just takes a bit longer. > > And possibly a clue-by-four. > > >> These long posts of yours, attacking various posters, doesn't serve >> you any useful purpose. Time is better spent continuing with your > > Serves to give us more chances for having side conversations, such as > the one concerning microcontrollers. > >> [...] You need to remember, communication via usenet wasn't intended >> to be for real time purposes. if you want that, pick up the phone or >> something. > > Speaking of, did you see that "deltachat" program? Seems they're wanting > to do IM over SMTP... SMTP historically supported IM with the "SEND" command. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc821 section 3.4 There doesn't seem to be much (any?) support for that any more, also that's not what deltachat is doing, they just doing IM over email. This could be a shake-up for the email-box industry. Big players like Alphabet, Verizon, and Microsoft like to play silly games with email sources. but it seems more likely that those three will squash this instead (also all three have competing products). -- When I tried casting out nines I made a hash of it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-23 20:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnq4hjbf.97b.dan@xps-linux.djph.net> |
| In reply to | #52966 |
Jasen Betts wrote: > On 2019-01-23, Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> wrote: >> Diesel wrote: >>> [...] >>> You may infact just suffer from stubborn ignorance. It's a curable >>> condition as well, just takes a bit longer. >> >> And possibly a clue-by-four. >> >> >>> These long posts of yours, attacking various posters, doesn't serve >>> you any useful purpose. Time is better spent continuing with your >> >> Serves to give us more chances for having side conversations, such as >> the one concerning microcontrollers. >> >>> [...] You need to remember, communication via usenet wasn't intended >>> to be for real time purposes. if you want that, pick up the phone or >>> something. >> >> Speaking of, did you see that "deltachat" program? Seems they're wanting >> to do IM over SMTP... > > SMTP historically supported IM with the "SEND" command. > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc821 section 3.4 > There doesn't seem to be much (any?) support for that any more, > also that's not what deltachat is doing, they just doing IM over email. > > This could be a shake-up for the email-box industry. Big players like > Alphabet, Verizon, and Microsoft like to play silly games with email > sources. but it seems more likely that those three will squash this > instead (also all three have competing products). > Ah, then i misinterpreted what they were doing ... -- |_|O|_| Registered Linux user #585947 |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert |O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5 4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Diesel <me@privacy.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-28 05:30 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA9E55DC515F3HT1@u0ECeNR06M8rvC48OAE0PoWATk.R71Y3.1XH5k> |
| In reply to | #52966 |
Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> news:q2af07$3fi$1@gonzo.alcatraz Wed, 23 Jan 2019 19:23:51 GMT in alt.os.linux, wrote: > On 2019-01-23, Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> wrote: >> Diesel wrote: >>> [...] >>> You may infact just suffer from stubborn ignorance. It's a >>> curable condition as well, just takes a bit longer. >> >> And possibly a clue-by-four. >> >> >>> These long posts of yours, attacking various posters, doesn't >>> serve you any useful purpose. Time is better spent continuing >>> with your >> >> Serves to give us more chances for having side conversations, >> such as the one concerning microcontrollers. >> >>> [...] You need to remember, communication via usenet wasn't >>> intended to be for real time purposes. if you want that, pick up >>> the phone or something. >> >> Speaking of, did you see that "deltachat" program? Seems they're >> wanting to do IM over SMTP... > > SMTP historically supported IM with the "SEND" command. > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc821 section 3.4 > There doesn't seem to be much (any?) support for that any more, > also that's not what deltachat is doing, they just doing IM over > email. Hmm.. SEND still works. [g] -- 'YOU NAAAAASTY MAN!' - Joe Penner
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-28 19:16 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q2nkf4$qpu$1@gonzo.alcatraz> |
| In reply to | #53266 |
On 2019-01-28, Diesel <me@privacy.net> wrote: > Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> news:q2af07$3fi$1@gonzo.alcatraz Wed, > 23 Jan 2019 19:23:51 GMT in alt.os.linux, wrote: > >> On 2019-01-23, Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> wrote: >>> Diesel wrote: >>>> [...] >>>> You may infact just suffer from stubborn ignorance. It's a >>>> curable condition as well, just takes a bit longer. >>> >>> And possibly a clue-by-four. >>> >>> >>>> These long posts of yours, attacking various posters, doesn't >>>> serve you any useful purpose. Time is better spent continuing >>>> with your >>> >>> Serves to give us more chances for having side conversations, >>> such as the one concerning microcontrollers. >>> >>>> [...] You need to remember, communication via usenet wasn't >>>> intended to be for real time purposes. if you want that, pick up >>>> the phone or something. >>> >>> Speaking of, did you see that "deltachat" program? Seems they're >>> wanting to do IM over SMTP... >> >> SMTP historically supported IM with the "SEND" command. >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc821 section 3.4 >> There doesn't seem to be much (any?) support for that any more, >> also that's not what deltachat is doing, they just doing IM over >> email. > > Hmm.. SEND still works. [g] I mean the SMTP "SEND" keyword, not some send button on some application. Got an example? -- When I tried casting out nines I made a hash of it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Diesel <me@privacy.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-30 04:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA9E6F01D37620HT1@1V7NNc6Rrr0.4270tgFchlo8Om7EPe7r.zUJT8aeJ465jg16wu9IM> |
| In reply to | #53300 |
Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> news:q2nkf4$qpu$1@gonzo.alcatraz Mon, 28 Jan 2019 19:16:52 GMT in alt.os.linux, wrote: [snip] > I mean the SMTP "SEND" keyword, not some send button on some > application. Got an example? I wasn't writing about a button, but, what I was writing about doesn't really apply in this case. The only example I have is an antique email server that was part of a BBS package. While it supports the send command (although I doubt it's compliant), it's not something everyone would be using these days. Apologies for the confusion caused by myself. -- Follow your heart and let your head take care of itself.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-30 05:18 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q2rc2t$au7$1@gonzo.alcatraz> |
| In reply to | #53365 |
On 2019-01-30, Diesel <me@privacy.net> wrote: > Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> news:q2nkf4$qpu$1@gonzo.alcatraz Mon, > 28 Jan 2019 19:16:52 GMT in alt.os.linux, wrote: > > [snip] > >> I mean the SMTP "SEND" keyword, not some send button on some >> application. Got an example? > > I wasn't writing about a button, but, what I was writing about doesn't > really apply in this case. The only example I have is an antique email > server that was part of a BBS package. While it supports the send > command (although I doubt it's compliant), it's not something everyone > would be using these days. Apologies for the confusion caused by > myself. So "still works" for very liberal values of "still". Nevertheless thanks for sharing that. -- When I tried casting out nines I made a hash of it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Diesel <me@privacy.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-03 02:14 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA9EAD8B9CADE2HT1@RAOI9JZ5.n02Olno> |
| In reply to | #53369 |
Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> news:q2rc2t$au7$1@gonzo.alcatraz Wed, 30 Jan 2019 05:18:21 GMT in alt.os.linux, wrote: > On 2019-01-30, Diesel <me@privacy.net> wrote: >> Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> news:q2nkf4$qpu$1@gonzo.alcatraz >> Mon, 28 Jan 2019 19:16:52 GMT in alt.os.linux, wrote: >> >> [snip] >> >>> I mean the SMTP "SEND" keyword, not some send button on some >>> application. Got an example? >> >> I wasn't writing about a button, but, what I was writing about >> doesn't really apply in this case. The only example I have is an >> antique email server that was part of a BBS package. While it >> supports the send command (although I doubt it's compliant), it's >> not something everyone would be using these days. Apologies for >> the confusion caused by myself. > > So "still works" for very liberal values of "still". Nevertheless > thanks for sharing that. > Er.. Sorry if I've offended. :) And, you're welcome, I think? -- Nitrate: Lower than the day rate.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-23 00:32 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <20190123003246.7becc06a@WizardsTower> |
| In reply to | #52932 |
On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 01:14:42 -0000 (UTC) arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> wrote: > All you can do is claim all facts are wrong - sans any proof. The proof is in the putting and I'm putting the proof, in the form of message IDs (see below) which are YOUR writings, in most every message I send these days. > It's the hallmark of children nospam (look at Cybe Wizard for an > example). I've never claimed that your 'facts' are wrong; I've merely suggested that they are very few and far between and that what does emerge from your dementia is not factual too often. For instance, what you just said about me is just a lie. NO facts present. BTW, have you yet come up with the list of TEN THOUSAND tutorials you say you wrote in Message-ID: <po4626$vpu$1@news.mixmin.net>? Hey, Harloo, do you really believe that anyone thinks you to be honest any more now that your constant lies are being broadcast worldwide so regularly? Cybe R. Wizard -knows you liars well -- A liar begins with making falsehood appear like truth, and ends with making truth itself appear like falsehood. William Shenstone
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-23 20:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q2ajhk$gsm$1@news.mixmin.net> |
| In reply to | #52942 |
On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 00:32:46 -0600, Cybe R. Wizard wrote: > I've never claimed that your 'facts' are wrong; Cybe R Wizard, *You prove my point of your worthlessness in every post, Cybe R Wizard.* Cybe R Wizard, 1. Your type of worthless drivel never adds _any_ value to any thread. 2. In fact, your posts, Cybe R Wizard, add _negative_ value. 3. Hence, alienating you is a "good thing" since you can't post value. Cybe R Wizard, You prove your utter incomprehensible lack of value in every post.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-23 20:49 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnq4hkqn.97b.dan@xps-linux.djph.net> |
| In reply to | #52976 |
arlen holder wrote: > On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 00:32:46 -0600, Cybe R. Wizard wrote: > >> I've never claimed that your 'facts' are wrong; > > arlen holder, > > *You prove my point of your worthlessness in every post, arlen holder.* > > arlen holder, > 1. Your type of worthless drivel never adds _any_ value to any thread. > 2. In fact, your posts, arlen holder, add _negative_ value. > 3. Hence, alienating you is a "good thing" since you can't post value. > > arlen holder, > You prove your utter incomprehensible lack of value in every post. ftfy. hth. hand. -- |_|O|_| Registered Linux user #585947 |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert |O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5 4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-23 15:46 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <20190123154645.45c99a66@WizardsTower> |
| In reply to | #52977 |
On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 20:49:28 -0000 (UTC) Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> wrote: > arlen holder wrote: > > On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 00:32:46 -0600, Cybe R. Wizard wrote: > > > >> I've never claimed that your 'facts' are wrong; > > > > arlen holder, > > > > *You prove my point of your worthlessness in every post, arlen > > holder.* > > > > arlen holder, > > 1. Your type of worthless drivel never adds _any_ value to any > > thread. 2. In fact, your posts, arlen holder, add _negative_ value. > > 3. Hence, alienating you is a "good thing" since you can't post > > value. > > > > arlen holder, > > You prove your utter incomprehensible lack of value in every post. > > ftfy. hth. hand. > Well done! (but you forgot FOAD there at the end) Cybe R. Wizard -- My other gun shoots fadeaway
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-23 15:38 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <20190123153853.0bcfa713@WizardsTower> |
| In reply to | #52976 |
On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 20:41:28 -0000 (UTC) arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> wrote: > On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 00:32:46 -0600, Cybe R. Wizard wrote: > > > I've never claimed that your 'facts' are wrong; > > Cybe R Wizard, > > *You prove my point of your worthlessness in every post, Cybe R > Wizard.* > > Cybe R Wizard, > 1. Your type of worthless drivel never adds _any_ value to any thread. There;s always value is showing liars to be liars. Therefore, here is one of your lies, claiming to have personally written TEN THOUSAND tutorials: Message-ID: <po4626$vpu$1@news.mixmin.net> > 2. In fact, your posts, Cybe R Wizard, add _negative_ value. Negative toward you, I will readily admit. Shut me up. Go ahead; you know how. I've explicitly told you haw. Just do it. > 3. Hence, alienating you is a "good thing" since you can't post value. You fail once again, then. You haven't alienated me, Ardline, if fact, just the opposite. I am closer and closer to you daily, living right there inside your head each time you admit to yourself that I am right about you being a liar. You /KNOW/ that it's true. > > Cybe R Wizard, > You prove your utter incomprehensible lack of value in every post. The great value of showing liars to be liars is ongoing and at least an honest endeavor. That it is incomprehensible TO /YOU/ is pretty telling, too. Cybe R. Wizard -- “Maybe you're dead inside and don't even know it.” Bryant McGill, Simple Reminders: Inspiration for Living Your Best Life
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-23 15:50 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <gas5t9FnvefU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #52981 |
On 01/23/2019 3:38 PM, Cybe R. Wizard wrote: > On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 20:41:28 -0000 (UTC) > arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 00:32:46 -0600, Cybe R. Wizard wrote: >> >>> I've never claimed that your 'facts' are wrong; >> >> Cybe R Wizard, >> >> *You prove my point of your worthlessness in every post, Cybe R >> Wizard.* >> >> Cybe R Wizard, >> 1. Your type of worthless drivel never adds _any_ value to any thread. > > There;s always value is showing liars to be liars. > > Therefore, here is one of your lies, claiming to have personally written > TEN THOUSAND tutorials: > Message-ID: <po4626$vpu$1@news.mixmin.net> > >> 2. In fact, your posts, Cybe R Wizard, add _negative_ value. > > Negative toward you, I will readily admit. Shut me up. Go ahead; you > know how. I've explicitly told you haw. Just do it. > >> 3. Hence, alienating you is a "good thing" since you can't post value. > > You fail once again, then. > You haven't alienated me, Ardline, if fact, just the opposite. I am > closer and closer to you daily, living right there inside your head > each time you admit to yourself that I am right about you being a > liar. You /KNOW/ that it's true. >> >> Cybe R Wizard, >> You prove your utter incomprehensible lack of value in every post. > > The great value of showing liars to be liars is ongoing and at least an > honest endeavor. That it is incomprehensible TO /YOU/ is pretty > telling, too. > > Cybe R. Wizard > Hey Cybe, Whilst your there inside his head maybe you can rattle up his one and a half brain cells, might help, but again maybe not, but thanks for trying. :-) Rene
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-23 15:59 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <20190123155932.1b5b5577@WizardsTower> |
| In reply to | #52984 |
On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 15:50:30 -0600 Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> wrote: > On 01/23/2019 3:38 PM, Cybe R. Wizard wrote: > > On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 20:41:28 -0000 (UTC) > > arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> wrote: > > > >> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 00:32:46 -0600, Cybe R. Wizard wrote: > >> > >>> I've never claimed that your 'facts' are wrong; > >> > >> Cybe R Wizard, > >> > >> *You prove my point of your worthlessness in every post, Cybe R > >> Wizard.* > >> > >> Cybe R Wizard, > >> 1. Your type of worthless drivel never adds _any_ value to any > >> thread. > > > > There;s always value is showing liars to be liars. > > > > Therefore, here is one of your lies, claiming to have personally > > written TEN THOUSAND tutorials: > > Message-ID: <po4626$vpu$1@news.mixmin.net> > > > >> 2. In fact, your posts, Cybe R Wizard, add _negative_ value. > > > > Negative toward you, I will readily admit. Shut me up. Go ahead; > > you know how. I've explicitly told you haw. Just do it. > > > >> 3. Hence, alienating you is a "good thing" since you can't post > >> value. > > > > You fail once again, then. > > You haven't alienated me, Ardline, if fact, just the opposite. I am > > closer and closer to you daily, living right there inside your head > > each time you admit to yourself that I am right about you being a > > liar. You /KNOW/ that it's true. > >> > >> Cybe R Wizard, > >> You prove your utter incomprehensible lack of value in every > >> post. > > > > The great value of showing liars to be liars is ongoing and at > > least an honest endeavor. That it is incomprehensible TO /YOU/ is > > pretty telling, too. > > > > Cybe R. Wizard > > > > Hey Cybe, Whilst your there inside his head maybe you can rattle up > his one and a half brain cells, might help, but again maybe not, but > thanks for trying. :-) > > Rene I appreciate your support. I /AM/ trying to get him to grow up and be a man about his lying, but is seeming pretty hopeless. He really is far gone. Cybe R. Wizard -- When I was growing up, my family was so poor we couldn't afford to pay attention. Mr. T
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-23 22:06 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <gas6q9FnqsqU5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #52985 |
On 2019-01-23, Cybe R. Wizard <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> wrote: > On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 15:50:30 -0600 > Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> wrote: >> On 01/23/2019 3:38 PM, Cybe R. Wizard wrote: >>> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 20:41:28 -0000 (UTC) >>> arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 00:32:46 -0600, Cybe R. Wizard wrote: >>>> >>>>> I've never claimed that your 'facts' are wrong; >>>> >>>> Cybe R Wizard, >>>> >>>> *You prove my point of your worthlessness in every post, Cybe R >>>> Wizard.* >>>> >>>> Cybe R Wizard, 1. Your type of worthless drivel never adds _any_ >>>> value to any thread. >>> >>> There;s always value is showing liars to be liars. >>> >>> Therefore, here is one of your lies, claiming to have personally >>> written TEN THOUSAND tutorials: Message-ID: >>> <po4626$vpu$1@news.mixmin.net> >>> >>>> 2. In fact, your posts, Cybe R Wizard, add _negative_ value. >>> >>> Negative toward you, I will readily admit. Shut me up. Go ahead; >>> you know how. I've explicitly told you haw. Just do it. >>> >>>> 3. Hence, alienating you is a "good thing" since you can't post >>>> value. >>> >>> You fail once again, then. You haven't alienated me, Ardline, if >>> fact, just the opposite. I am closer and closer to you daily, >>> living right there inside your head each time you admit to yourself >>> that I am right about you being a liar. You /KNOW/ that it's true. >>>> >>>> Cybe R Wizard, You prove your utter incomprehensible lack of value >>>> in every post. >>> >>> The great value of showing liars to be liars is ongoing and at >>> least an honest endeavor. That it is incomprehensible TO /YOU/ is >>> pretty telling, too. >>> >>> Cybe R. Wizard >>> >> >> Hey Cybe, Whilst your there inside his head maybe you can rattle up >> his one and a half brain cells, might help, but again maybe not, but >> thanks for trying. :-) >> >> Rene > > I appreciate your support. I /AM/ trying to get him to grow up and be > a man about his lying, but is seeming pretty hopeless. He really is > far gone. > > Cybe R. Wizard You're wasting your time with him. He's a lost cause. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-23 16:09 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <20190123160929.770475ef@WizardsTower> |
| In reply to | #52986 |
On 23 Jan 2019 22:06:01 GMT Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: > On 2019-01-23, Cybe R. Wizard <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> > wrote: > > On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 15:50:30 -0600 > > Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> wrote: > >> On 01/23/2019 3:38 PM, Cybe R. Wizard wrote: > >>> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 20:41:28 -0000 (UTC) > >>> arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 00:32:46 -0600, Cybe R. Wizard wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> I've never claimed that your 'facts' are wrong; > >>>> > >>>> Cybe R Wizard, > >>>> > >>>> *You prove my point of your worthlessness in every post, Cybe R > >>>> Wizard.* > >>>> > >>>> Cybe R Wizard, 1. Your type of worthless drivel never adds _any_ > >>>> value to any thread. > >>> > >>> There;s always value is showing liars to be liars. > >>> > >>> Therefore, here is one of your lies, claiming to have personally > >>> written TEN THOUSAND tutorials: Message-ID: > >>> <po4626$vpu$1@news.mixmin.net> > >>> > >>>> 2. In fact, your posts, Cybe R Wizard, add _negative_ value. > >>> > >>> Negative toward you, I will readily admit. Shut me up. Go ahead; > >>> you know how. I've explicitly told you haw. Just do it. > >>> > >>>> 3. Hence, alienating you is a "good thing" since you can't post > >>>> value. > >>> > >>> You fail once again, then. You haven't alienated me, Ardline, if > >>> fact, just the opposite. I am closer and closer to you daily, > >>> living right there inside your head each time you admit to > >>> yourself that I am right about you being a liar. You /KNOW/ that > >>> it's true. > >>>> > >>>> Cybe R Wizard, You prove your utter incomprehensible lack of > >>>> value in every post. > >>> > >>> The great value of showing liars to be liars is ongoing and at > >>> least an honest endeavor. That it is incomprehensible TO /YOU/ > >>> is pretty telling, too. > >>> > >>> Cybe R. Wizard > >>> > >> > >> Hey Cybe, Whilst your there inside his head maybe you can rattle up > >> his one and a half brain cells, might help, but again maybe not, > >> but thanks for trying. :-) > >> > >> Rene > > > > I appreciate your support. I /AM/ trying to get him to grow up and > > be a man about his lying, but is seeming pretty hopeless. He > > really is far gone. > > > > Cybe R. Wizard > > You're wasting your time with him. He's a lost cause. > Hope springs eternal. I am an optimist most times. I /almost/ believe in him. ...but then: "A wise man proportions his belief to the evidence." David Hume Cybe R. Wizard -- Optimism - the doctrine or belief that everything is beautiful, including what is ugly. Ambrose Bierce
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-24 00:07 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnq4i0ej.97b.dan@xps-linux.djph.net> |
| In reply to | #52987 |
Cybe R. Wizard wrote: > On 23 Jan 2019 22:06:01 GMT > Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: > >> You're wasting your time with him. He's a lost cause. >> > Hope springs eternal. I am an optimist most times. > I /almost/ believe in him. > > ...but then: > "A wise man proportions his belief to the evidence." > David Hume Who ever said you were wise? :-p -- |_|O|_| Registered Linux user #585947 |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert |O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5 4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-23 18:27 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <20190123182755.2665d448@WizardsTower> |
| In reply to | #52991 |
On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 00:07:47 -0000 (UTC) Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> wrote: > Cybe R. Wizard wrote: > > On 23 Jan 2019 22:06:01 GMT > > Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: > > > >> You're wasting your time with him. He's a lost cause. > >> > > Hope springs eternal. I am an optimist most times. > > I /almost/ believe in him. > > > > ...but then: > > "A wise man proportions his belief to the evidence." > > David Hume > > Who ever said you were wise? :-p > I thought it to be obvious that I am /NOT/ proportioning my belief to the evidence and so assuredly am not wise if I am still thinking him to be salvageable. ! ! ! :-\ Cybe R. Wizard -always thinkin' ) -- Bunkrapt: "Biologist Peter Medawar coined the term bunkrapt to describe believers in things lacking a scientific basis, like immortal souls, loving gods or quantum consciousness fields pervading the cosmos."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-23 19:16 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <gashvfFqe0eU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #52992 |
On 01/23/2019 6:27 PM, Cybe R. Wizard wrote: > On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 00:07:47 -0000 (UTC) > Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> wrote: > >> Cybe R. Wizard wrote: >>> On 23 Jan 2019 22:06:01 GMT >>> Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: >>> >>>> You're wasting your time with him. He's a lost cause. >>>> >>> Hope springs eternal. I am an optimist most times. >>> I /almost/ believe in him. >>> >>> ...but then: >>> "A wise man proportions his belief to the evidence." >>> David Hume >> >> Who ever said you were wise? :-p >> > I thought it to be obvious that I am /NOT/ proportioning my belief to > the evidence and so assuredly am not wise if I am still thinking him to > be salvageable. > > ! ! ! :-\ > > Cybe R. Wizard -always thinkin' ) > Pretty sad, If he had at least *two* brain cells they might mate and produce more little brain cells. But as it stands there's not much hope for the poor lad, I'm afraid he's over the edge. :-( Rene
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.os.linux
csiph-web