Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.os.linux > #81249
| From | micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.os.linux, comp.sys.mac.system, comp.mobile.android |
| Subject | Re: RCS messaging |
| Message-ID | <q4dsuj1c4edrmsg0mu8hle4n3nuejhkq2n@4ax.com> (permalink) |
| References | <MPG.4255dc25afeeae9b9903d7@news.individual.net> <u20ublxg5s.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <MPG.42572070115bfc079903dc@news.individual.net> <vsk9hs.ne0.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> <vski4i$lvs$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> |
| Organization | Tweaknews |
| Date | 2025-04-03 03:16 -0400 |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
In alt.comp.os.windows-10, on Wed, 2 Apr 2025 23:44:19 -0000 (UTC), Marion <marion@facts.com> wrote: >On 2 Apr 2025 19:17:58 GMT, Frank Slootweg wrote : > > >>>> > 2. When I forward a message that I received via Verizon's email-to- >>>> > text feature, and it contains a photo, the photo is queued for >>>> > forwarding but the text is discarded. >>>> >>>> No Verizon here, so can't replicate. >>> >>> You do know that pretty much every carrier maintains a way to send an >>> email to a particular phone number?(*) It's not just Verizon. (I >>> have Visible, but the email-to-phone thing is the same because >>> Visible uses its corporate parent Verizon's network.) >> >> As Andy indicated, in Europe (i.e. for Carlos, Andy and me) - and >> probably most of the rest of the non-US world - these e-mail-to-SMS/MMS >> and vice versa gateways are a thing of the past. These days, people just >> use modern IM (Instant Messaging) platforms (if they only know a >> recipient's phonenumber, but not hir e-mail address). >> >> Also MMS is a thing of the past and SMS is mostly a thing of the past >> (except for *receiving* SMS messages (for 2SV and other purposes)). > >I'm in the USA and while there are essentially only 3 major carriers, all >of whom have an SMS-to-Email gateway, I agree with Frank that it's almost >unused here (as far as I can tell from my own personal experience). I don't want to have to turn on my phone to send a text, so for the one or two people I write to often, I've found the email address of their phones, and I use email from the PC and they get a text. Then when they reply to me with a text, I get an email. It's very convenient. >As for RCS, I haven't experienced anyone in the USA who communicates with They changed texting on my phone to RCS. I use mintmobile on a Xiaomi phone. Not sure who made the change. If the other party is also using RCS, I think it would show on my phone whether or not they'd read my text. That would be good to know. AFAIK prior to RCS no one provided that info. >me having anything to do with it - but I'm using PulseSMS as my default >SMS/MMS app, and it doesn't have RCS so I probably wouldn't even know it. > >My only issue is when I receive a video from iPhone users, I have to switch >those iPhone users to WhatsApp (which most of them have) to be non blurry. > >I suspect (hope?) that when RCS/encryption arrives, things will improve.
Back to alt.os.linux | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: RCS messaging Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-04-02 23:44 +0000
Re: RCS messaging "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> - 2025-04-02 22:54 -0400
Re: RCS messaging Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-04-03 06:13 +0000
Re: RCS messaging micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2025-04-03 03:16 -0400
Re: RCS messaging micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2025-04-03 06:11 -0400
Re: RCS messaging micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2025-04-03 06:19 -0400
Re: RCS messaging micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2025-04-03 06:49 -0400
csiph-web