Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.os.linux > #81249

Re: RCS messaging

From micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com>
Newsgroups alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.os.linux, comp.sys.mac.system, comp.mobile.android
Subject Re: RCS messaging
Message-ID <q4dsuj1c4edrmsg0mu8hle4n3nuejhkq2n@4ax.com> (permalink)
References <MPG.4255dc25afeeae9b9903d7@news.individual.net> <u20ublxg5s.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <MPG.42572070115bfc079903dc@news.individual.net> <vsk9hs.ne0.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> <vski4i$lvs$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
Organization Tweaknews
Date 2025-04-03 03:16 -0400

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


In alt.comp.os.windows-10, on Wed, 2 Apr 2025 23:44:19 -0000 (UTC),
Marion <marion@facts.com> wrote:

>On 2 Apr 2025 19:17:58 GMT, Frank Slootweg wrote :
>
>
>>>> > 2. When I forward a message that I received via Verizon's email-to-
>>>> > text feature, and it contains a photo, the photo is queued for
>>>> > forwarding but the text is discarded.
>>>> 
>>>> No Verizon here, so can't replicate.
>>> 
>>> You do know that pretty much every carrier maintains a way to send an 
>>> email to a particular phone number?(*)  It's not just Verizon. (I 
>>> have Visible, but the email-to-phone thing is the same because 
>>> Visible uses its corporate parent Verizon's network.) 
>> 
>>   As Andy indicated, in Europe (i.e. for Carlos, Andy and me) - and
>> probably most of the rest of the non-US world - these e-mail-to-SMS/MMS
>> and vice versa gateways are a thing of the past. These days, people just
>> use modern IM (Instant Messaging) platforms (if they only know a
>> recipient's phonenumber, but not hir e-mail address).
>> 
>>   Also MMS is a thing of the past and SMS is mostly a thing of the past
>> (except for *receiving* SMS messages (for 2SV and other purposes)).
>
>I'm in the USA and while there are essentially only 3 major carriers, all
>of whom have an SMS-to-Email gateway, I agree with Frank that it's almost
>unused here (as far as I can tell from my own personal experience).

I don't want to have to turn on my phone to send a text, so for the one
or two people I write to often, I've found the email address of their
phones, and I use email from the PC and they get a text.

Then when they reply to me with a text, I get an email.  It's very
convenient. 

>As for RCS, I haven't experienced anyone in the USA who communicates with

They changed texting on my phone to RCS.  I use mintmobile on a Xiaomi
phone.  Not sure who made the change.   If the other party is also using
RCS, I think it would show on my phone whether or not they'd read my
text.  That would be good to know.  AFAIK prior to RCS no one provided
that info. 

>me having anything to do with it - but I'm using PulseSMS as my default
>SMS/MMS app, and it doesn't have RCS so I probably wouldn't even know it.
>
>My only issue is when I receive a video from iPhone users, I have to switch
>those iPhone users to WhatsApp (which most of them have) to be non blurry.
>
>I suspect (hope?) that when RCS/encryption arrives, things will improve.

Back to alt.os.linux | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: RCS messaging Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-04-02 23:44 +0000
  Re: RCS messaging "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> - 2025-04-02 22:54 -0400
    Re: RCS messaging Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-04-03 06:13 +0000
  Re: RCS messaging micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2025-04-03 03:16 -0400
  Re: RCS messaging micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2025-04-03 06:11 -0400
    Re: RCS messaging micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2025-04-03 06:19 -0400
      Re: RCS messaging micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2025-04-03 06:49 -0400

csiph-web