Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.os.linux > #39280
| Path | csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> |
| Newsgroups | alt.os.linux |
| Subject | Re: "Linux kernel security needs a rethink" ? |
| Date | Tue, 27 Sep 2016 09:35:07 -0700 |
| Lines | 14 |
| Message-ID | <e4vldtFb6snU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <4svkubl9fpf4fut5tq8chgg6pqbtut0clt@net.com> <e4vidrFaf0kU1@mid.individual.net> <nse4ii$lf2$2@news.albasani.net> <e4vjj0Fao1jU1@mid.individual.net> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | individual.net 3i2jIL7i0IkYtGZxUw25ewUY4nuh2IZAtfrl8vQWxBjkMsx6pX |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:x/d4X9yxI/9fgt/LfmlvB2tJ7iY= |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <e4vjj0Fao1jU1@mid.individual.net> |
| Xref | csiph.com alt.os.linux:39280 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Mike Easter wrote: > The presentation covered by Ars doesn't provide any direction to a > solution. Maybe google's microkernel Fuchsia can be evolved into a security-oriented OS. Little Kernel > Magenta > Fuchsia > ? http://www.tomshardware.com/news/google-fuchsia-new-operating-system,32475.html Google Is Building A New Operating System From Scratch: 'Fuchsia' -- Mike Easter
Back to alt.os.linux | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
"Linux kernel security needs a rethink" ? Yrrah <Yrrah-aol@aol.invalid> - 2016-09-27 16:28 +0200
Re: "Linux kernel security needs a rethink" ? jrg <connyank@cox.net> - 2016-09-27 08:25 -0700
Re: "Linux kernel security needs a rethink" ? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2016-09-27 08:43 -0700
Re: "Linux kernel security needs a rethink" ? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2016-09-27 15:51 +0000
Re: "Linux kernel security needs a rethink" ? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2016-09-27 09:03 -0700
Re: "Linux kernel security needs a rethink" ? "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2016-09-27 18:26 +0200
Re: "Linux kernel security needs a rethink" ? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2016-09-27 09:35 -0700
Re: "Linux kernel security needs a rethink" ? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2016-09-27 16:43 +0000
Re: "Linux kernel security needs a rethink" ? Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2016-09-28 06:59 -0400
Re: "Linux kernel security needs a rethink" ? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2016-09-27 16:42 +0000
Re: "Linux kernel security needs a rethink" ? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-27 18:53 +0200
Re: "Linux kernel security needs a rethink" ? stepore <linshine@here.now> - 2016-09-27 21:07 -0700
Re: "Linux kernel security needs a rethink" ? Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2016-09-28 07:36 -0400
Re: "Linux kernel security needs a rethink" ? William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2016-09-28 10:28 +0000
Re: "Linux kernel security needs a rethink" ? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2016-09-28 10:55 +0000
Re: "Linux kernel security needs a rethink" ? Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2016-09-27 08:53 -0700
Re: "Linux kernel security needs a rethink" ? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-09-27 12:39 -0400
Re: "Linux kernel security needs a rethink" ? Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2016-09-28 06:56 -0400
csiph-web