Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.os.linux > #39128
| From | Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.os.linux |
| Subject | Re: Xtra-PC scam |
| Date | 2016-09-24 14:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e4o9htFi0a1U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <253def73c6d7dc5fab51b8458b1adda4@remailer.paranoici.org> <e4npdtFe4lqU1@mid.individual.net> <e4o1o4Fg54cU1@mid.individual.net> |
Mike Easter wrote: > The stick is a modified/customized Lub installed to the USB; the Lub as > delivered is without proprietary stuff like TrueType fonts and the Lub > restricted extras repo items, so when the new user starts and creates an > admin account and then accesses the internet successfully, it starts > installing the proprietary ware when the user agrees to such as the MS > EULA. I find myself wondering about some 'strategies' of the Lub stick. Typically, when one is booting a live USB, there is an 'initialization' process by which the (unknown to the .iso) hardware issues are characterized and solved, which occasionally requires some user input at the boot. However, when one creates an install to the USB, the boot process is different from the live, so making a full install capable to go out to the 'masses' of different hardware must be tricky or potentially problematic. Also, full installs potentially create some writing 'wear and tear' on the USB. This xtra-pc lub is trying to make old hardware which is more likely USB 2 and not so much ram and not so much cpu act sprightly. So, how to 'decide' how to manage the 'run from ram' metrics? Puppy Linux creator Barry Kauler is a maestro at that ram management strategy. When I read discussions about how to make USB installs, I run into such as this discussion //entry// (from 2013): // I recently tested a number of types of USB flash drive installs, for speed, using 12.04: Full install, no swap. Full install, swap. Full install, separate ext2 home partition. Full install, swap, separate ext2 home partition. Full install, swap, separate ext2 home partition, FAT32 partition. Persistent, casper-rw file. Persistent, casper-rw partition. Persistent, casper-rw + home-rw partition. Persistent, casper-rw + home-rw partitions with Try/Install screen removed. Iso boot, Persistent, casper-rw + home-rw partitions with Try/Install screen removed. I tried again after removing journaling and adding noatime on the Full installs. // That page is informative before and after the entry I posted part above. https://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2130234&p=12578569&viewfull=1#post12578569 Re: Choosing between Live USB and Full USB Installation -- Mike Easter
Back to alt.os.linux | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Xtra-PC scam Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2016-09-24 07:34 +0000
Re: Xtra-PC scam Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2016-09-24 09:54 -0700
Re: Xtra-PC scam Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2016-09-24 12:16 -0700
Re: Xtra-PC scam Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2016-09-24 14:29 -0700
csiph-web