Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.os.linux.mint > #45618
| From | Peter McD <peter.posts@gmx.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.os.linux.mint |
| Subject | Re: GPU advise? |
| Date | 2025-10-25 13:13 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mm3pmpF8kpdU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <10d7n7d$3r9cm$1@dont-email.me> <mlv8slFg0d6U2@mid.individual.net> <10deu3n$2b86l$1@dont-email.me> <mm0t03Fo4rnU1@mid.individual.net> <10dfvfs$2k5f1$1@dont-email.me> |
Am 24.10.25 um 15:38 schrieb Paul: > On Fri, 10/24/2025 4:51 AM, Peter McD wrote: > >> All in all I agree that the average power requirements are much lower than that >> what my power supply could deliver. My computer uses a 65W processer (so to say) >> and it temperature is currently around 38°C, so I estimate the whole system may >> normally use around 50 W. >> >> But I also read that the RX6600 power consumption may spike to more than 500W >> under certain conditions and I want that covered. >> > > That suggests a rather large regulator block on the RX6600. > (The RTX5090 can hit 600W on its regulator, but more square > inches would be put aside for it. > > It doesn't look that big here. > > https://www.techspot.com/articles-info/2343/images/2021-10-12-image-j.webp > > ( https://www.techspot.com/review/2343-amd-radeon-rx-6600/ ) > > This one has 25 phases for 600 watts. > > "RTX5090 takeapart" > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mClh3SDF2SM > > Your card has a 150W connector on the upper right. There > are six phases showing. If we pulled a number out of the air, > of 35 watts per phase, maybe it could supply 210 watts. > > It's supposed to limit at 132W. > ... I already upgraded the power supply to 800W when I changed the card about two years ago. So the money is spent. Next time I will lock closer to what is required when I change parts. Thank you for your answer anyway, I know now a lot more about graphics card power requirements which might come in handy when I need an other one. Peter > GPU-Z shows the power-state, so that you can figure out > what limit the card has hit. There is a text label identifying > the name of the state. Detection of overcurrent should be > automatic, unless the user has a software that disables a limiter. > > https://www.techpowerup.com/download/techpowerup-gpu-z/ > > # Check under the Sensors tab, play a game and see what it says > > The 5+1 phase regulator, looks like it would "squawk" if the > GPU attempted to draw 500W. > > Before modern cards got these features, when Furmark first > came out, you could damage a video card with Furmark. Then > the drivers got "recognition" of Furmark, and they would > turn down the clock on purpose, to prevent Furmark from > breaking something. This is open loop control, implemented > with software. And it's pretty sloppy. > > But eventually the hardware people said enough is enough, > and they put all sorts of controls in. There should also be > one for temperature. NVidia released a couple drivers, > where a mistake to one of the source files resulted in > the fans not spinning. Which makes cards hot. When that > happens on the CPU, the "THERMTRIP" feature causes the > entire PC power to go off. But the GPU back then > was not protected. The introduction of closed loop > control, having what was supposed to be an automatic > fan response curve, these were things invented to put > a stop to "low quality product behaviors". > > To hit 500W, I think someone would have to hack the > controls and turn off the power limiter. Then, you need > a stimulus capable of driving the card that hard. > > Also, if the card was doing that, the loom feeding the > 2x4, it would have an overcurrent detection on it. > The PSU is going to go off if that transient lasts > for enough milliseconds. When a PSU has a large amperage > on +12V, the wiring is split into separate looms, and > the looms can have limits around 20 amps or so. > > Paul > > >
Back to alt.os.linux.mint | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
GPU advise? Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> - 2025-10-21 10:46 +0200
Re: GPU advise? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-10-21 06:27 -0400
Re: GPU advise? Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> - 2025-10-21 14:37 +0200
Re: GPU advise? Peter McD <peter.posts@gmx.net> - 2025-10-23 20:01 +0200
Re: GPU advise? Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> - 2025-10-23 23:13 +0200
Re: GPU advise? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-10-24 00:08 -0400
Re: GPU advise? Peter McD <peter.posts@gmx.net> - 2025-10-24 10:51 +0200
Re: GPU advise? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-10-24 09:38 -0400
Re: GPU advise? Peter McD <peter.posts@gmx.net> - 2025-10-25 13:13 +0200
csiph-web