Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.os.assembly > #18
| From | Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@zxdehrnyya.cam> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.os.assembly, alt.lang.asm, alt.os.development |
| Subject | Re: Protected mode on 64-bit CPU |
| Date | 2016-09-03 23:17 -0400 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <20160903231714.401eef2c@_> (permalink) |
| References | <563a8630-6a56-4480-9b76-d519ca60acbe@googlegroups.com> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On Sat, 3 Sep 2016 19:10:19 -0700 (PDT) muskrat7@gmail.com wrote: > Does anyone know why 64-bit long mode does not have built-in hardware > protection? I know many didn't use the 32-bit hardware segmentation > but it was a nice option to have if you wanted... Did they just get > rid of it in 64-bit mode due to the perception it wouldn't be used or > were there other limitations that prevented this feature? > I'm cross-posting this to alt.os.development and alt.lang.asm. You might also try posts to comp.lang.asm.x86 and comp.arch. Rod Pemberton
Back to alt.os.assembly | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Protected mode on 64-bit CPU muskrat7@gmail.com - 2016-09-03 19:10 -0700
Re: Protected mode on 64-bit CPU Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@zxdehrnyya.cam> - 2016-09-03 23:17 -0400
Re: Protected mode on 64-bit CPU "wolfgang kern" <nowhere@never.at> - 2016-09-04 11:27 +0200
Re: Protected mode on 64-bit CPU James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-09-04 13:01 +0100
Re: Protected mode on 64-bit CPU Muskrat <muskrat7@gmail.com> - 2016-09-04 10:10 -0700
Re: Protected mode on 64-bit CPU James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-09-04 21:53 +0100
csiph-web