Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.off-topic > #4 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Jim G." <notthe0therjimg@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2023-12-10 17:16 +0000 |
| Last post | 2024-04-07 02:01 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.off-topic
Hypothetical situation "Jim G." <notthe0therjimg@gmail.invalid> - 2023-12-10 17:16 +0000
Re: Hypothetical situation Kyonshi <gmkeros@gmail.com> - 2024-04-07 02:01 +0200
| From | "Jim G." <notthe0therjimg@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-12-10 17:16 +0000 |
| Subject | Hypothetical situation |
| Message-ID | <ul4rop$2jmv7$1@paganini.bofh.team> |
Supposing I had a burblefroth package, should I keep it or toss it out?
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kyonshi <gmkeros@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-04-07 02:01 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <20240407020115.0000414b@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #4 |
On Sun, 10 Dec 2023 17:16:09 -0000 (UTC) "Jim G." <notthe0therjimg@gmail.invalid> wrote: > Supposing I had a burblefroth package, should I keep it or toss it > out? Depends, do you need a burblefroth package?
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | alt.off-topic
csiph-web