Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.non.sequitur > #2067 > unrolled thread

Re: test [essay question]

Back to article view | Back to alt.non.sequitur

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: test [essay question] pyracantha <pyrac@ntha.in.garden> - 2016-04-06 10:18 -0400
    Re: test [essay question] pyracantha <pyrac@ntha.in.garden> - 2016-04-06 10:44 -0400
      Re: test [essay question] Jim Carleton <jrcarleton@gmail.com> - 2024-02-01 11:37 -0800

#2067 — Re: test [essay question]

pyracantha wrote:

> 1.   one political faction complains that "wall street" is using large
>      money to interfere in local and national politics.

> 2.   some states enact legislations that favor a particular sort of personal behavior.

> 3.   some large corporations threaten economic retributions in
>      response to these legislations so as to overturn them.

> 4.   that same political faction as described in [1.] fails to disclaim "wall street"
>      for gross interference in local or national politics.

> explain why this political faction as described in [1.] is not a bunch of hypocrites.


i wouldn't jump on your bandwagon if i had just fallen off the turnip truck


which i haven't

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#2068

> > 1.   one political faction complains that "wall street" is using large
> >      money to interfere in local and national politics.

> > 2.   some states enact legislations that favor a particular sort of personal behavior.

> > 3.   some large corporations threaten economic retributions in
> >      response to these legislations so as to overturn them.

> > 4.   that same political faction as described in [1.] fails to disclaim "wall street"
> >      for gross interference in local or national politics.

> > explain why this political faction as described in [1.] is not a bunch of hypocrites.

> i wouldn't jump on your bandwagon if i had just fallen off the turnip truck

> which i haven't

evidently, though, there are a whole lot of people who have fallen off the turnip truck,
banged their collective heads, seen stars and jumped on this other bandwagon, which just 
happens to LOok like the turnip truck they just fell off and they're Back on board Again  

trouble is, i've SEEN this movie, and just recently, and those same turnip truck people 
will start 'kvetching'  midway through the picture and complain as to how they don't 
like this 'new way' the turnip truck is heading.

lucky for us, we have the entrenched bureaucracy to save us from our own stoopididitty.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2177

On Wednesday, April 6, 2016 at 10:50:30 AM UTC-4, pyracantha wrote:
> > > 1. one political faction complains that "wall street" is using large 
> > > money to interfere in local and national politics. 
> 
> > > 2. some states enact legislations that favor a particular sort of personal behavior. 
> 
> > > 3. some large corporations threaten economic retributions in 
> > > response to these legislations so as to overturn them. 
> 
> > > 4. that same political faction as described in [1.] fails to disclaim "wall street" 
> > > for gross interference in local or national politics. 
> 
> > > explain why this political faction as described in [1.] is not a bunch of hypocrites. 
> 
> > i wouldn't jump on your bandwagon if i had just fallen off the turnip truck 
> 
> > which i haven't
> evidently, though, there are a whole lot of people who have fallen off the turnip truck, 
> banged their collective heads, seen stars and jumped on this other bandwagon, which just 
> happens to LOok like the turnip truck they just fell off and they're Back on board Again 
> 
> trouble is, i've SEEN this movie, and just recently, and those same turnip truck people 
> will start 'kvetching' midway through the picture and complain as to how they don't 
> like this 'new way' the turnip truck is heading. 
> 
> lucky for us, we have the entrenched bureaucracy to save us from our own stoopididitty.

Hi, is this where I write my essay for the test question? Riboflavin-enriched acrobats were sneaking into the dishwasher repair shop, where they all silently put their hands into a large pie. The pie was named Tobias, and there was a nearby houseplant conveniently also named Tobias. Together, we all screamed that we were very itchy, and then later a walnut bounced gingerly across the Toys 'R' Us parking lot. In summary, my lamp is very shapely. Take this lozenge or else I will charge you $0.31 every time you forget to sneeze.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | alt.non.sequitur

csiph-web