Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.msdos.programmer > #8 > unrolled thread
| Started by | T. Ment <triflemenot@protocol.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-02-28 16:43 +0000 |
| Last post | 2019-03-05 15:56 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 69 — 10 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.msdos.programmer
C scanf() T. Ment <triflemenot@protocol.invalid> - 2019-02-28 16:43 +0000
Re: C scanf() T. Ment <t.ment@protocol.invalid> - 2019-02-28 22:07 +0000
Re: C scanf() "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-03-01 10:10 +0100
Re: C scanf() Steve Nickolas <usotsuki@buric.co> - 2019-03-01 08:22 -0500
Re: C scanf() T. Ment <t.ment@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-01 16:25 +0000
Re: C scanf() "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-03-01 17:39 +0100
Re: C scanf() src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-01 18:08 +0000
Re: C scanf() src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-01 18:22 +0000
Re: C scanf() rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Ross Ridge) - 2019-03-01 19:04 +0000
Re: C scanf() src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-01 19:15 +0000
Re: C scanf() rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Ross Ridge) - 2019-03-01 19:20 +0000
Re: C scanf() src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-01 19:31 +0000
Re: C scanf() rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Ross Ridge) - 2019-03-01 21:29 +0000
Re: C scanf() src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-01 21:53 +0000
Re: C scanf() rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Ross Ridge) - 2019-03-01 22:20 +0000
Re: C scanf() src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-01 22:48 +0000
Re: C scanf() rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Ross Ridge) - 2019-03-01 23:34 +0000
Re: C scanf() src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-01 23:41 +0000
Re: C scanf() rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Ross Ridge) - 2019-03-02 00:09 +0000
Re: C scanf() src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-02 00:14 +0000
Re: C scanf() rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Ross Ridge) - 2019-03-02 00:19 +0000
Re: C scanf() src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-02 00:32 +0000
Re: C scanf() rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Ross Ridge) - 2019-03-02 00:44 +0000
Re: C scanf() "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-03-02 09:55 +0100
Re: C scanf() src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-02 15:54 +0000
Re: C scanf() "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-03-02 19:43 +0100
Re: C scanf() rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Ross Ridge) - 2019-03-02 18:58 +0000
Re: C scanf() "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-03-02 20:16 +0100
Re: C scanf() "Kerr-Mudd,John" <notsaying@invalid.org> - 2019-03-03 08:08 +0000
Re: C scanf() "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-03-03 10:05 +0100
Re: C scanf() src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-03 14:56 +0000
Re: C scanf() src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-02 19:06 +0000
Re: C scanf() Sjouke Burry <burrynulnulfour@ppllaanneett.nnll> - 2019-03-02 20:12 +0100
Re: C scanf() src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-02 19:23 +0000
Re: C scanf() Sjouke Burry <burrynulnulfour@ppllaanneett.nnll> - 2019-03-02 21:39 +0100
Re: C scanf() "Gene Buckle" <gene.buckle@bbs.retroarchive.org.remove-zcb-this> - 2019-03-05 08:53 -0800
Re: C scanf() "Gene Buckle" <gene.buckle@bbs.retroarchive.org.remove-zcb-this> - 2019-03-05 08:53 -0800
Re: C scanf() src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-05 17:45 +0000
Re: C scanf() "Kerr-Mudd,John" <notsaying@invalid.org> - 2019-03-05 19:59 +0000
Re: C scanf() "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-03-02 20:23 +0100
Re: C scanf() src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-02 19:53 +0000
Re: C scanf() "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-03-02 21:50 +0100
Re: C scanf() src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-02 21:19 +0000
Re: C scanf() "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-03-02 22:46 +0100
Re: C scanf() src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-02 22:09 +0000
Re: C scanf() Rod Pemberton <invalid@lkntrgzxc.com> - 2019-03-02 17:05 -0500
Re: C scanf() src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-02 22:43 +0000
Re: C scanf() Rod Pemberton <invalid@lkntrgzxc.com> - 2019-03-02 17:07 -0500
Re: C scanf() "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-03-03 07:44 +0100
Re: C scanf() Rod Pemberton <invalid@lkntrgzxc.com> - 2019-03-03 02:20 -0500
Re: C scanf() "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-03-03 09:57 +0100
Re: C scanf() Steve Nickolas <usotsuki@buric.co> - 2019-03-03 02:22 -0500
Re: C scanf() "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-03-02 09:39 +0100
Re: C scanf() Rod Pemberton <invalid@lkntrgzxc.com> - 2019-03-01 16:58 -0500
Re: C scanf() src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-01 22:39 +0000
Re: C scanf() Rod Pemberton <invalid@lkntrgzxc.com> - 2019-03-01 21:10 -0500
Re: C scanf() rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Ross Ridge) - 2019-03-01 22:46 +0000
Re: C scanf() src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-01 22:55 +0000
Re: C scanf() "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-03-01 21:15 +0100
Re: C scanf() Rod Pemberton <invalid@lkntrgzxc.com> - 2019-03-01 16:58 -0500
Re: C scanf() T. Ment <t.ment@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-01 22:30 +0000
Re: C scanf() "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-03-02 09:29 +0100
Re: C scanf() src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-02 16:10 +0000
Re: C scanf() "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-03-02 19:54 +0100
Re: C scanf() src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-02 19:12 +0000
Re: C scanf() src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-04 16:57 +0000
Re: C scanf() src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-04 18:59 +0000
Re: C scanf() Rod Pemberton <invalid@lkntrgzxc.com> - 2019-03-04 23:52 -0500
Re: C scanf() src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-05 15:56 +0000
Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 Next page →
| From | src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-02 19:53 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ajnl7epe2ajl4ev5djnng78sro7ngnqmjd@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #51 |
On Sat, 2 Mar 2019 20:23:11 +0100, "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> wrote: > Pick any of your patch files. Break a line after the colon and/or after the > second value. The code still works. But the two lines do not become annotations as I thought. > Moron. Thanks for the help friend. Took you long enough to get around to it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-02 21:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <q5eqb7$mdk$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #53 |
src153, > The code still works. Yes. And thats exactly the problem. > But the two lines do not become annotations as I thought. Have you already figured it out why ? Stupid, aint it ? Of you I mean. So simple, and even with everything infront of you *and* with it having been pointed out to you by me a few times you failed to spot it. > Thanks for the help friend. Someone who wields his religion as a shield so he doesn't have to reason or explain will /never/ be a friend of mine, regardles of which god he claims to worship. And yes, /claim/, as you are not, in any way, living according to jesus guidings. Far from it actually. You're nothing more than, what we call here, a "mouth christian" - All talk, but no conviction. None. > Took you long enough to get around to it. If I wouldn't have told it you would most likely /never/ have found it on your own. And I'm afraid that you have thrown away all credit you might have had here. Stupid enough to refuse to listen /or/ test - even when *you got the problem on a silver platter* - and using religion as a justifies-all weapon/shield. And ofcourse some fast talk to explain you failing even your own blacklist promiss. Face it kiddo, you blew it good. Not that I have a problem with that, mind you. :-) Regards, Rudy Wieser
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-02 21:19 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <kgsl7ede0or8uimp8nik4004ltl1fbqf9c@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #55 |
On Sat, 2 Mar 2019 21:50:45 +0100, "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> wrote: > you have thrown away all credit That's a lot of venom for one technical error. >> But the two lines do not become annotations as I thought. > Have you already figured it out why? It's eating the newline as whitespace. I thought the format string would prevent that. I'll look at it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-02 22:46 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <q5etip$14n6$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #56 |
src153, > That's a lot of venom for one technical error. :-) keep believing that kiddo. Just deny everything else having ever happened. It suits you. > It's eating the newline as whitespace. I thought the format string > would prevent that. You MORON. Your own formatting makes use of it: you /specifically/ went for a "%*[ \t]" construction so you /wouldn't/ skip a newline there. And now you claim not to have known ? How dense can you be ... Next time maybe try to actually /test/ what you wrote, and not just believe that it will work. This is science kiddo, not some religion. Keep the non-questioning deferrence for your church - or whatever you call your place of worship. Than again, hearing you here there is a good chance you just copy-pasted that from somewhere, without really knowing what it does - and not caring either. Kiddo, have a nice, long life. Goodbye.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-02 22:09 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ukvl7elromp0vsm6q41e5m649ai4pp3j3v@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #57 |
On Sat, 2 Mar 2019 22:46:00 +0100, "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> wrote: >You MORON. Your own formatting makes use of it: you /specifically/ went for >a "%*[ \t]" construction so you /wouldn't/ skip a newline there. And now >you claim not to have known ? How dense can you be ... You done with your victory dance yet? I got some information from this. What did you get?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rod Pemberton <invalid@lkntrgzxc.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-02 17:05 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q5euja$198i$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #42 |
On Sat, 02 Mar 2019 15:54:59 +0000 src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> wrote: <OT religion, yet again, on yet another newsgroup ...> > > you discover that your "stairway into heaven" turns out to be a > > "ladder into hell". I suggest you make amends before that point. > > Atheists can't understand the Bible because they start with a false > premise. I don't know your final destination, > FYI, I'm non-religious. I avoid the terms athiest and agnostic, as the terms are biased, i.e., defined from a religious perspective. It may be harder to be a programmer when religious, as truth and logic are so important to the task. I don't hold anything against the religious, with one exception, as most of my friends and family are. However, they claim that the Bible is the word of God, usually absolute, yet they cherry-pick what they want to believe from within it and twist what was said to fit their Christian beliefs. For example, you most likely believe you'll get into Heaven simply because you accepted Jesus Christ as your savior, but that isn't what the Bible actually says. You only get to visit the Father for doing so: John 14:6 KJV And, I know your final destination isn't in Heaven, at least according to Christianity: Luke 20:35 KJV Revelations 7:3-4 KJV Revelations 14:1-4 KJV I doubt that you - or just about anyone who has ever lived on the planet Earth - meet all the requirements to make it into Heaven as in versus cited above: males not defiled by women, virgins unmarried and not betrothed only 144,000 make it into Heaven name of the Father on their foreheads children of Israel Now, just what would a male "God and the Lamb" want with "the firstfruits" ... (Revelations 14:4) You can check those verses for various Bible versions here: https://www.biblegateway.com/ If you want to learn about the more bizarre and disgusting aspects of Christianity, this is a good place to start: https://www.nobeliefs.com/DarkBible/DarkBibleContents.htm Rod Pemberton -- Apple opposes "glorifying violence" and "dehumanizing language". Yet, it manufactures products in China which commits crimes against humanity.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-02 22:43 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <8s0m7e9e8jgap8ifsejstb9l3t2l197s02@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #58 |
On Sat, 2 Mar 2019 17:05:59 -0500, Rod Pemberton <invalid@lkntrgzxc.com> wrote: > If you want to learn about the more bizarre and disgusting aspects of > Christianity, this is a good place to start: I'm not here to convert unbelievers, so I won't debate that further. But a small mention of God or the Bible lets them self identify, which saves time. I don't hate anyone, but why waste time making friends with the dying and the dead. As for the subject material, can you help with the format string? I'm having trouble working around the problem Weiser identified. It doesn't render the program useless, it just means you need to be careful that your annotations don't inadvertently match a pattern of patch data. It would be nice to fix, if possible. If not, the program still does its job.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rod Pemberton <invalid@lkntrgzxc.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-02 17:07 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q5eum8$198i$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #41 |
On Sat, 2 Mar 2019 09:55:47 +0100 "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> wrote: > When you discover that your > "stairway into heaven" turns out to be a "ladder into hell". Eh, what Hell? "As above, so below" is what some say ... So, apparently, there are two Heavens. Ever heard a Satanist say the Lord's Prayer? Me neither, but it would clearly have the same words but with different meanings. "Yes, there are two paths you can go by, but in the long run, there's still time to change the road you're on." ... "And, she's buying a stairway to Heaven. There's a sign on the wall, but she wants to be sure, 'cause you know sometimes words have two meanings." Um, how did we get onto "Stairway to Heaven" by Led Zeppelin? This is what happens when you guys start talking about religion. Rod Pemberton -- Apple opposes "glorifying violence" and "dehumanizing language". Yet, it manufactures products in China which commits crimes against humanity.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-03 07:44 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <q5ft46$1897$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #59 |
Rod, > Eh, what Hell? To be honest, I have /no/ idea. Its just what most, if not all christians are threatened with. Funny that, as its led by one of gods own angels. A supposedly fallen one, but an angel nonetheless. There seem to be a few more hells though. Like the one for babies that die before being baptized. As without such a (placed by another human!) "seal of gods approval" humans are (supposedly) not allowed to enter heaven. /Regardless/ of if they are the most innocent of innocent. There is one description of heaven and hell I rather like: Heaven and hell are the same table, dished with the most delicious of foods. The guests are all seated. For some reason they cannot lean forward and their elbows are locked in a straight position). The food is always in easy reach though. The "hell" people pick up the food, but are unable to feed themselves. The "heaven" people pick up food, turn sideways and feed each other. In other words: Its not the spot that makes heaven or hell, its the people. Rather profound I would say. Some people even consider earth to be hell. And they do have a bit of a point there ... Regards, Rudy Wieser
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rod Pemberton <invalid@lkntrgzxc.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-03 02:20 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q5fv3b$1gf8$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #63 |
On Sun, 3 Mar 2019 07:44:17 +0100 "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> wrote: > Some people even consider earth to be hell. And they do have a bit > of a point there ... FYI, in Christianity, the Earth is Heaven, not that any Christian I've ever met actually knows that. Matthew 5:5 - meek shall inherit the Earth Numbers 12:3 - Moses is the meekest of the meek Psalm 76:9 - judgment saves the meek Revelations 20-21 - Earth will be restored Heaven is also described in Revelations, but it's a gaudy, jewel-encrusted, abomination designed to tempt the greedy. Rod Pemberton -- Apple opposes "glorifying violence" and "dehumanizing language". Yet, it manufactures products in China which commits crimes against humanity.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-03 09:57 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <q5g4to$9fg$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #64 |
Rod, > Matthew 5:5 - meek shall inherit the Earth > Numbers 12:3 - Moses is the meekest of the meek > Psalm 76:9 - judgment saves the meek > Revelations 20-21 - Earth will be restored Than we have a difference in interpretation there I guess. If I go for just those titles neither the second nor the third applies. The first and the last could, and probably do, refer to adam & eves paradise. If it actually existed that is, and is not, just like that specific hell place of fire and brimstone led by the devil and his minions, a human invention. Also, as mentioned before, beeing expected to be "meek" is an invention of more recent decades (take the crusades for example, ore the even more recent excommunicating of different-thinkers), which makes me question that particular translation/interpretation ... > Heaven is also described in Revelations, but it's a > gaudy, jewel-encrusted, abomination designed to tempt > the greedy. If that would be all that it would be I would not have a problem with it. But the fact that lots of innocent people are victimized when temptations get a hold onto someone .... What have those done to deserve to be used like that ? Just to serve as examples to other greedy people that are still on the treshold ? Thats a bit (understatement) dark. I'm not an atheist (my believe in science does not allow me. Proof of his existance might appear tomorrow), but over time I've become an agnost who leans against the bottom limit of it. Religous people refer to it as "lost his faith". To be honest, I don't know if I ever had one to begin with and was not just going thru the motions to humour my parents (not that you have, as a child, much to say in it). Regards, Rudy Wieser
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Nickolas <usotsuki@buric.co> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-03 02:22 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <alpine.BSF.2.02.1903030220450.80951@frieza.hoshinet.org> |
| In reply to | #59 |
On Sat, 2 Mar 2019, Rod Pemberton wrote: > Eh, what Hell? "As above, so below" is what some say ... So, > apparently, there are two Heavens. Ever heard a Satanist say the > Lord's Prayer? Me neither, but it would clearly have the same words > but with different meanings. One of the phrases in the Lord's Prayer sounds suspiciously like "as above so below" when literally translated. (It's the one traditionally rendered "on earth as it is in heaven") -uso.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-02 09:39 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <q5dfh5$g84$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #29 |
src153, > Jesus said if they don't believe Moses, they won't believe > miracles either. So if you don't believe Moses, you get none. Thats is what people with an religious agenda always try to turn it into. The other way to read it is that you still get them (jesus was never picky about who he helped) but you will not recognise them as such. ... or they are not miracles at all to begin with, but the religious people with an agenda would like you to believe they are. :-) Regards, Rudy Wieser
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rod Pemberton <invalid@lkntrgzxc.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-01 16:58 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q5c9pg$1glp$4@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #19 |
On Fri, 01 Mar 2019 19:31:47 +0000 src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> wrote: > On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 19:20:21 +0000 (UTC), rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca > > I would just like to be added to your killfile as well. Thanks. > > When it suits me, not you. > Ross and Rudy have both been around here for a long time. They may be prickly, but they're not trolls. IRC, at one point, they were both going to put each other in their own killfiles. As you noted, not many people are here. So, you may wish to apologize if you want someone to talk to ... Rod Pemberton -- Apple opposes "glorifying violence" and "dehumanizing language". Yet, it manufactures products in China which commits crimes against humanity.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-01 22:39 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <jocj7e1ev2b501o6jpnv09bl4onlnvsad9@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #24 |
On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 16:58:37 -0500, Rod Pemberton <invalid@lkntrgzxc.com> wrote: > As you noted, not many people are here. So, you may wish to apologize > if you want someone to talk to ... Rod, you read the material and understood it. If other people are too lazy to bother, I will not spend my time reading it aloud to them like children.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rod Pemberton <invalid@lkntrgzxc.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-01 21:10 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q5cohd$1gke$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #27 |
On Fri, 01 Mar 2019 22:39:31 +0000 src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> wrote: > On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 16:58:37 -0500, Rod Pemberton > <invalid@lkntrgzxc.com> wrote: > > As you noted, not many people are here. So, you may wish to > > apologize if you want someone to talk to ... > > Rod, you read the material and understood it. If other people are too > lazy to bother, I will not spend my time reading it aloud to them like > children. > a) Yes, but you can't assume the guys here are C programmers either. They might be, or they might be x86 assembly guys, which is more likely IMO in regards to the varieties of DOS. Or, they could have experience with both like me. Of course, you might see a Pascal/Delphi guy every now and again too. (If anyone here is under age 35, maybe even 45, they've probably never done any C or x86 assembly programming, i.e., all internet/website or mobile/smartphone programming.) b) As for C compilers, very few use Turbo C or Borland C anymore. I've usually seen Turbo C and Borland C used for 16-bit C code, but OpenWatcom can do that too. I think these are the most common (non-commercial). Gnu GCC via Linux, DJGPP, MinGW, or Cygwin. LCC via LCC-Win32 or Pelles C. OpenWatcom. LLVM. etc. Personally, I'm using DJGPP (GCC) and OpenWatcom for home use on MS-DOS, and GCC on Linux. I've been considering checking out a newer version of OpenWatcom for Linux, i.e., speed as my computer is aging. Occasionally, someone will use (Bruce's) BCC or Ladsoft. There are some others like SmallerC or Small C or TCC etc that aren't frequently used. https://gcc.gnu.org/ http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/ http://www.mingw.org/ https://www.cygwin.com/ https://lcc-win32.services.net/ https://www.pellesc.de/ http://openwatcom.org/ https://llvm.org/ http://ladsoft.tripod.com/ Rod Pemberton -- Apple opposes "glorifying violence" and "dehumanizing language". Yet, it manufactures products in China which commits crimes against humanity.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Ross Ridge) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-01 22:46 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q5ccoe$1v2d$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #24 |
Rod Pemberton <invalid@lkntrgzxc.com> wrote: >They may be prickly, but they're not trolls. IRC, at one point, they >were both going to put each other in their own killfiles. I don't recall anyone threatening to put me in their killfile here. I also haven't put anyone in my killfile in over 20 years, so I think you may be thinking of someone else. And to be honest, I am trolling the name changing guy. While I do really want him to put me in his killfile, I am of course also mocking him. I always find it absurd when people think it's some sort of punishment. -- l/ // Ross Ridge -- The Great HTMU [oo][oo] rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca -()-/()/ http://www.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/~rridge/ db //
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-01 22:55 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nqdj7el79pq19lljlkurjifqjih8vhf7fv@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #28 |
On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 22:46:38 +0000 (UTC), rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Ross Ridge) wrote: > killfile ... I always find it absurd when people think it's some > sort of punishment. No, you don't understand. My killfile gets rid of pests who try to waste my time. There is no need to punish the dead.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-01 21:15 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <q5c3u6$mme$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #14 |
src153, > False statement. I see you do not try to support your position either. Whats stopping /you/ ? Regards, Rudy Wieser
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rod Pemberton <invalid@lkntrgzxc.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-01 16:58 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q5c9p8$1glp$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #13 |
On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 17:39:01 +0100 "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> wrote: > > I only want to present an alternate view of scanf() > > All you do is /claim/ that its possible, without offering anything to > support it. Whats stoping you ? > He mentioned pamo.c in the first post in this thread, but he didn't post it in this thread. He posted pamo.c in "PC-MOS 2012 date bug fix" thread: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.os.msdos.programmer/_sIrf_P3k2c/MMiD6tzPBwAJ In pamo.c, he's using this format string for scanf(): char fmt[] = "%lx: %x %x%*[ \t]%1[^\n]"; It appears to conform to ANSI C. In it he uses the [ conversion, along with field width specifications, which allows him to specify specific characters to search for, specifically any quantity of spaces and tabs, and then one or more characters except a newline. This is probably far easier than using strtok(). However, portability and compliance of string format specifications can be questionable, especially so for low use formats such as this one. As for whether it does what he claims, IDK. I've serious issues with ANSI C compliant format strings working correctly with different compilers and for different environments. I.e., it might or it might not, even if correct C code. Rod Pemberton -- Apple opposes "glorifying violence" and "dehumanizing language". Yet, it manufactures products in China which commits crimes against humanity.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.msdos.programmer
csiph-web