Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.msdos.programmer > #8 > unrolled thread

C scanf()

Started byT. Ment <triflemenot@protocol.invalid>
First post2019-02-28 16:43 +0000
Last post2019-03-05 15:56 +0000
Articles 20 on this page of 69 — 10 participants

Back to article view | Back to alt.msdos.programmer


Contents

  C scanf() T. Ment <triflemenot@protocol.invalid> - 2019-02-28 16:43 +0000
    Re: C scanf() T. Ment <t.ment@protocol.invalid> - 2019-02-28 22:07 +0000
    Re: C scanf() "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-03-01 10:10 +0100
      Re: C scanf() Steve Nickolas <usotsuki@buric.co> - 2019-03-01 08:22 -0500
        Re: C scanf() T. Ment <t.ment@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-01 16:25 +0000
          Re: C scanf() "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-03-01 17:39 +0100
            Re: C scanf() src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-01 18:08 +0000
              Re: C scanf() src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-01 18:22 +0000
              Re: C scanf() rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Ross Ridge) - 2019-03-01 19:04 +0000
                Re: C scanf() src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-01 19:15 +0000
                  Re: C scanf() rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Ross Ridge) - 2019-03-01 19:20 +0000
                    Re: C scanf() src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-01 19:31 +0000
                      Re: C scanf() rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Ross Ridge) - 2019-03-01 21:29 +0000
                        Re: C scanf() src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-01 21:53 +0000
                          Re: C scanf() rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Ross Ridge) - 2019-03-01 22:20 +0000
                            Re: C scanf() src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-01 22:48 +0000
                              Re: C scanf() rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Ross Ridge) - 2019-03-01 23:34 +0000
                                Re: C scanf() src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-01 23:41 +0000
                                  Re: C scanf() rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Ross Ridge) - 2019-03-02 00:09 +0000
                                    Re: C scanf() src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-02 00:14 +0000
                                      Re: C scanf() rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Ross Ridge) - 2019-03-02 00:19 +0000
                                        Re: C scanf() src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-02 00:32 +0000
                                          Re: C scanf() rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Ross Ridge) - 2019-03-02 00:44 +0000
                                  Re: C scanf() "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-03-02 09:55 +0100
                                    Re: C scanf() src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-02 15:54 +0000
                                      Re: C scanf() "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-03-02 19:43 +0100
                                        Re: C scanf() rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Ross Ridge) - 2019-03-02 18:58 +0000
                                          Re: C scanf() "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-03-02 20:16 +0100
                                            Re: C scanf() "Kerr-Mudd,John" <notsaying@invalid.org> - 2019-03-03 08:08 +0000
                                              Re: C scanf() "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-03-03 10:05 +0100
                                                Re: C scanf() src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-03 14:56 +0000
                                        Re: C scanf() src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-02 19:06 +0000
                                          Re: C scanf() Sjouke Burry <burrynulnulfour@ppllaanneett.nnll> - 2019-03-02 20:12 +0100
                                            Re: C scanf() src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-02 19:23 +0000
                                              Re: C scanf() Sjouke Burry <burrynulnulfour@ppllaanneett.nnll> - 2019-03-02 21:39 +0100
                                                Re: C scanf() "Gene Buckle" <gene.buckle@bbs.retroarchive.org.remove-zcb-this> - 2019-03-05 08:53 -0800
                                                Re: C scanf() "Gene Buckle" <gene.buckle@bbs.retroarchive.org.remove-zcb-this> - 2019-03-05 08:53 -0800
                                                  Re: C scanf() src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-05 17:45 +0000
                                                  Re: C scanf() "Kerr-Mudd,John" <notsaying@invalid.org> - 2019-03-05 19:59 +0000
                                          Re: C scanf() "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-03-02 20:23 +0100
                                            Re: C scanf() src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-02 19:53 +0000
                                              Re: C scanf() "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-03-02 21:50 +0100
                                                Re: C scanf() src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-02 21:19 +0000
                                                  Re: C scanf() "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-03-02 22:46 +0100
                                                    Re: C scanf() src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-02 22:09 +0000
                                      Re: C scanf() Rod Pemberton <invalid@lkntrgzxc.com> - 2019-03-02 17:05 -0500
                                        Re: C scanf() src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-02 22:43 +0000
                                    Re: C scanf() Rod Pemberton <invalid@lkntrgzxc.com> - 2019-03-02 17:07 -0500
                                      Re: C scanf() "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-03-03 07:44 +0100
                                        Re: C scanf() Rod Pemberton <invalid@lkntrgzxc.com> - 2019-03-03 02:20 -0500
                                          Re: C scanf() "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-03-03 09:57 +0100
                                      Re: C scanf() Steve Nickolas <usotsuki@buric.co> - 2019-03-03 02:22 -0500
                              Re: C scanf() "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-03-02 09:39 +0100
                      Re: C scanf() Rod Pemberton <invalid@lkntrgzxc.com> - 2019-03-01 16:58 -0500
                        Re: C scanf() src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-01 22:39 +0000
                          Re: C scanf() Rod Pemberton <invalid@lkntrgzxc.com> - 2019-03-01 21:10 -0500
                        Re: C scanf() rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Ross Ridge) - 2019-03-01 22:46 +0000
                          Re: C scanf() src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-01 22:55 +0000
              Re: C scanf() "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-03-01 21:15 +0100
            Re: C scanf() Rod Pemberton <invalid@lkntrgzxc.com> - 2019-03-01 16:58 -0500
              Re: C scanf() T. Ment <t.ment@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-01 22:30 +0000
              Re: C scanf() "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-03-02 09:29 +0100
                Re: C scanf() src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-02 16:10 +0000
                  Re: C scanf() "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-03-02 19:54 +0100
                    Re: C scanf() src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-02 19:12 +0000
              Re: C scanf() src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-04 16:57 +0000
                Re: C scanf() src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-04 18:59 +0000
                  Re: C scanf() Rod Pemberton <invalid@lkntrgzxc.com> - 2019-03-04 23:52 -0500
                    Re: C scanf() src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> - 2019-03-05 15:56 +0000

Page 2 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4  Next page →


#35

Fromrridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Ross Ridge)
Date2019-03-02 00:19 +0000
Message-ID<q5ci72$mf3$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#34
src153  <src153@protocol.invalid> wrote:
>You're good at missing the point, as atheists often do.

I have a different point to make here.  Let's see how it goes.

-- 
 l/  //	  Ross Ridge -- The Great HTMU
[oo][oo]  rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca
-()-/()/  http://www.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/~rridge/ 
 db  //	  

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#36

Fromsrc153 <src153@protocol.invalid>
Date2019-03-02 00:32 +0000
Message-ID<rfjj7eh3j9h9n2a7covu5n5s88sl3dl85u@4ax.com>
In reply to#35
On Sat, 2 Mar 2019 00:19:46 +0000 (UTC), rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca
(Ross Ridge) wrote:

> I have a different point to make here.  Let's see how it goes.

No, you don't have a point. You started a fight not your own, and you
don't know when to quit. I won't trouble the good people here by beating
you silly, so take it to another group if you enjoy it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#37

Fromrridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Ross Ridge)
Date2019-03-02 00:44 +0000
Message-ID<q5cjl5$sbl$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#36
rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Ross Ridge) wrote:
> I have a different point to make here.  Let's see how it goes.

src153  <src153@protocol.invalid> wrote:
>No, you don't have a point. You started a fight not your own, and you
>don't know when to quit. I won't trouble the good people here by beating
>you silly, so take it to another group if you enjoy it.

Sorry, I wouldn't be able to make my point if I did that.

-- 
 l/  //	  Ross Ridge -- The Great HTMU
[oo][oo]  rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca
-()-/()/  http://www.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/~rridge/ 
 db  //	  

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#41

From"R.Wieser" <address@not.available>
Date2019-03-02 09:55 +0100
Message-ID<q5dgem$jst$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#32
src153,

> No I'm just saying what Jesus said.

No, he didn't.  And the bible says that there is a special place in hell for 
people who (ab)use his, or his fathers name for their own good.

... But I guess you either skipped that part or are ignoring it for some 
reason.  Your day will come my lad.  When you discover that your "stairway 
into heaven" turns out to be a "ladder into hell".    I suggest you make 
amends before that point.  jesus may be forgiving, but god sure isn't.

Regards,
Rudy Wieser

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#42

Fromsrc153 <src153@protocol.invalid>
Date2019-03-02 15:54 +0000
Message-ID<fi8l7e1dk9ac58nfhkkdkv1mb44n6cqkon@4ax.com>
In reply to#41
On Sat, 2 Mar 2019 09:55:47 +0100, "R.Wieser" <address@not.available>
wrote:

> I found it that (in his "PC-MOS 2012 date bug fix" thread), and checked it 
> out. I did not see anything in it to support his stance though.

Rod understood it. But you still don't, even after he held your hand and
guided you to it.

When you can't add anything useful to the subject material, and can't
keep your mouth shut, you're a troll. Seniority doesn't make you less of
one.


>> I'm just saying what Jesus said.

> No, he didn't.

Yes he did. Luke 16:31.


> you discover that your "stairway into heaven" turns out to be a
> "ladder into hell".  I suggest you make amends before that point.

Atheists can't understand the Bible because they start with a false
premise. I don't know your final destination, but you're still headed to
my killfile.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#44

From"R.Wieser" <address@not.available>
Date2019-03-02 19:43 +0100
Message-ID<q5eirp$1jj9$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#42
src153,

> Yes he did. Luke 16:31.
...
>>> So if you don't believe Moses, you get none.

Do tell me where I can get that weed you're smoking. :-)

> Atheists can't understand the Bible

Having a bit of an agenda there, hmm ?

Newsflash: Most all religous people only /think/ that they know, and than 
come together to praise each other about how well the other agrees with what 
they agree with themselves.

Also: no, being able to regurgitate words does not constitute to 
understanding them.   If that where true than idiot-savants (or people with 
an eiditic memory) would be geniuses.

Next problem: Which iteration of the bible have you read (1) ?   And for 
that matter which branch-version of it ?   There are quite a number of 
branches which all call themselves christians (2).

(1) Most people, probably like you, are content with a translation that has 
gone thru a /lot/ of rewrites.   And FYI, whoe chapters have been removed 
over time, because the thanwhile pope thought the stories did not match 
their projection of jesus being a fully non-violent person.

... but for that one time he got angry.  But that again, that was just 
righteous indignation about how the place of worship of his father was used 
my merchants to sell stuff.

(2) and all of them claim to have /the only/ correct interpretation of the 
bible.   Funny that.

And for the record: define "atheists".    Just a friendly warning though: If 
it contains "not exactly believing what I believe" than you're /again/ make 
a mockery of jesus teachings.

> I don't know your final destination, but you're still headed to
> my killfile.

Yeah, about that ...   You have no problem with "alternative truths", do you 
?   In your first reply you told me you already put me there, confirmed with 
a second "easy reader" post.  But here you are, talking to me.  How's that 
possible ?

Regards,
Rudy Wieser

P.s.
Did you know that the different christian branches do not even have those 10 
commandments in the same order, of even have exactly 10 ?   They all must be 
heathens, don't you think ? :-)

P.p.s
When is the last time you stoned someone to death, christian or not, because 
he didn't follow the rules as layed out in the bible ?    'Cause that rule 
also in there (though, maybe not in your much later version of it).

You have never done that ?   Because you let /human/ Law trump the /Bible/ ? 
Seriously ?   You are not really a believer, are you ...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#46

Fromrridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Ross Ridge)
Date2019-03-02 18:58 +0000
Message-ID<q5ejoq$1ns7$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#44
src153 <src153@protocol.invalid> wrote:
> Atheists can't understand the Bible

R.Wieser <address@not.available> wrote:
> Having a bit of an agenda there, hmm ?

So he was lying then when he said he put you in his killfile...

-- 
 l/  //	  Ross Ridge -- The Great HTMU
[oo][oo]  rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca
-()-/()/  http://www.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/~rridge/ 
 db  //	  

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#50

From"R.Wieser" <address@not.available>
Date2019-03-02 20:16 +0100
Message-ID<q5ekq9$1sr5$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#46
Ross,

>> Having a bit of an agenda there, hmm ?
>
> So he was lying then when he said he put you in his killfile...

Ross !    You don't say that about a christian and god-fearing person like 
him.   I'm sure he can explain himself.  Probably by quoting something outof 
the bible.

Oh wait ...  Nope, I don't think he can. :-)

Regards
Rudy Wieser

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#66

From"Kerr-Mudd,John" <notsaying@invalid.org>
Date2019-03-03 08:08 +0000
Message-ID<XnsAA0752E559B52admin127001@144.76.35.198>
In reply to#50
On Sat, 02 Mar 2019 19:16:23 GMT, "R.Wieser" <address@not.available>
wrote: 

> Ross,
> 
>>> Having a bit of an agenda there, hmm ?
>>
>> So he was lying then when he said he put you in his killfile...
> 
> Ross !    You don't say that about a christian and god-fearing person
> like him.   I'm sure he can explain himself.  Probably by quoting
> something outof the bible.
> 
> Oh wait ...  Nope, I don't think he can. :-)
> 
> Regards
> Rudy Wieser
> 
> 
Have I fallen through a gap from dos programming into alt-flame-war-
religion?


-- 
Bah, and indeed, Humbug.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#68

From"R.Wieser" <address@not.available>
Date2019-03-03 10:05 +0100
Message-ID<q5g5dd$bdg$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#66
Kerr,

> Have I fallen through a gap from dos programming into alt-flame-war-
> religion?

Looks like it, doesn't it.

But no, its just what happens when some religously believes his program is 
faultless - while refusing to listen to anything else.

Regards,
Rudy Wieser

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#69

Fromsrc153 <src153@protocol.invalid>
Date2019-03-03 14:56 +0000
Message-ID<hhqn7e1irt4rsls0fik07p6sjraqfolpsb@4ax.com>
In reply to#68
On Sun, 3 Mar 2019 10:05:46 +0100, "R.Wieser" <address@not.available>
wrote:

> its just what happens when some religously believes his program is 
> faultless - while refusing to listen to anything else.

I posted the fix. Where you at, King Kong? Nothing more to say? Did you
put me in your killfile?

That may be for the best, there's no joy watching your head explode.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#47

Fromsrc153 <src153@protocol.invalid>
Date2019-03-02 19:06 +0000
Message-ID<1ujl7elpbmk0l9e28f2ios24cn4qphuf2v@4ax.com>
In reply to#44
On Sat, 2 Mar 2019 19:43:04 +0100, "R.Wieser" <address@not.available>
wrote:

>> I don't know your final destination, but you're still headed to
>> my killfile.

> In your first reply you told me you already put me there

I said into the killfile you go. I didn't say when. I won't further
litter this NG arguing with atheists, I just wondered what mindset I'm
dealing with. To continue down that path, take it to another group.

If you had anything useful to say about the subject material, it would
be apparent by now. What I see is, you don't understand it. And it's not
my job to educate you.

If you can prove the code wrong with a test case, do it, and post the
results. But that takes work, and you're all talk.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#49

FromSjouke Burry <burrynulnulfour@ppllaanneett.nnll>
Date2019-03-02 20:12 +0100
Message-ID<5c7ad5a8$0$31760$e4fe514c@textnews.kpn.nl>
In reply to#47
On 2-3-2019 20:06, src153 wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Mar 2019 19:43:04 +0100, "R.Wieser" <address@not.available>
> wrote:
>
>>> I don't know your final destination, but you're still headed to
>>> my killfile.
>
>> In your first reply you told me you already put me there
>
> I said into the killfile you go. I didn't say when. I won't further
> litter this NG arguing with atheists, I just wondered what mindset I'm
> dealing with. To continue down that path, take it to another group.
>
> If you had anything useful to say about the subject material, it would
> be apparent by now. What I see is, you don't understand it. And it's not
> my job to educate you.
>
> If you can prove the code wrong with a test case, do it, and post the
> results. But that takes work, and you're all talk.
>
>
It is their reason against your stupidity.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#52

Fromsrc153 <src153@protocol.invalid>
Date2019-03-02 19:23 +0000
Message-ID<qtll7e1jmt67igcr776o7i70p1inej2m49@4ax.com>
In reply to#49
On Sat, 02 Mar 2019 20:12:40 +0100, Sjouke Burry
<burrynulnulfour@ppllaanneett.nnll> wrote:

> It is their reason against your stupidity.

Are you joining the atheist tag team? All you pseudo intellectuals need
is one test case of failure.

Where is it?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#54

FromSjouke Burry <burrynulnulfour@ppllaanneett.nnll>
Date2019-03-02 21:39 +0100
Message-ID<5c7ae9fa$0$31778$e4fe514c@textnews.kpn.nl>
In reply to#52
On 2-3-2019 20:23, src153 wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Mar 2019 20:12:40 +0100, Sjouke Burry
> <burrynulnulfour@ppllaanneett.nnll> wrote:
>
>> It is their reason against your stupidity.
>
> Are you joining the atheist tag team? All you pseudo intellectuals need
> is one test case of failure.
>
> Where is it?
>
>
Trying to fight superstition with reason.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#74

From"Gene Buckle" <gene.buckle@bbs.retroarchive.org.remove-zcb-this>
Date2019-03-05 08:53 -0800
Message-ID<5C7EA9A7.138.usenet_amprogr@bbs.retroarchive.org>
In reply to#54
  To: Sjouke Burry
Sjouke wrote:
> From Newsgroup: alt.msdos.programmer
> 
> On 2-3-2019 20:23, src153 wrote:
>> On Sat, 02 Mar 2019 20:12:40 +0100, Sjouke Burry
>> <burrynulnulfour@ppllaanneett.nnll> wrote:
>>
>>> It is their reason against your stupidity.
>>
>> Are you joining the atheist tag team? All you pseudo intellectuals need
>> is one test case of failure.
>>
>> Where is it?
>>
>>
> Trying to fight superstition with reason.

You can't reason a person out of a position they didn't reason themselves
into. ;)

g.

-- 
Proud owner of F-15C 80-0007
http://www.f15sim.com - The only one of its kind.
http://www.diy-cockpits.org/coll - Go Collimated or Go Home.
Some people collect things for a hobby.  Geeks collect hobbies.

ScarletDME - The red hot Data Management Environment
A Multi-Value database for the masses, not the classes.
http://scarlet.deltasoft.com - Get it _today_!
--- Synchronet 3.17c-Win32 NewsLink 1.110
The Retro Archive - telnet://bbs.retroarchive.org

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#75

From"Gene Buckle" <gene.buckle@bbs.retroarchive.org.remove-zcb-this>
Date2019-03-05 08:53 -0800
Message-ID<5C7EA9A7.2881.usenet_comp@bbs.retroarchive.org>
In reply to#54
  To: Sjouke Burry
Sjouke wrote:
> From Newsgroup: alt.msdos.programmer
> 
> On 2-3-2019 20:23, src153 wrote:
>> On Sat, 02 Mar 2019 20:12:40 +0100, Sjouke Burry
>> <burrynulnulfour@ppllaanneett.nnll> wrote:
>>
>>> It is their reason against your stupidity.
>>
>> Are you joining the atheist tag team? All you pseudo intellectuals need
>> is one test case of failure.
>>
>> Where is it?
>>
>>
> Trying to fight superstition with reason.

You can't reason a person out of a position they didn't reason themselves
into. ;)

g.

-- 
Proud owner of F-15C 80-0007
http://www.f15sim.com - The only one of its kind.
http://www.diy-cockpits.org/coll - Go Collimated or Go Home.
Some people collect things for a hobby.  Geeks collect hobbies.

ScarletDME - The red hot Data Management Environment
A Multi-Value database for the masses, not the classes.
http://scarlet.deltasoft.com - Get it _today_!
--- Synchronet 3.17c-Win32 NewsLink 1.110
The Retro Archive - telnet://bbs.retroarchive.org

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#76

Fromsrc153 <src153@protocol.invalid>
Date2019-03-05 17:45 +0000
Message-ID<tsct7e9f3huq2mf6lj32u0nlak3fa4n731@4ax.com>
In reply to#75
On Tue, 5 Mar 2019 08:53:59 -0800, "Gene Buckle"
<gene.buckle@bbs.retroarchive.org.remove-zcb-this> wrote:

>> Trying to fight superstition with reason.
>
>You can't reason a person out of a position they didn't reason themselves
>into. ;)

That's why atheists never learn.

Is this a lonely atheist therapy group Gene? How rude of me to intrude
with a DOS programming topic.

If you like pain and suffering, I can help.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#77

From"Kerr-Mudd,John" <notsaying@invalid.org>
Date2019-03-05 19:59 +0000
Message-ID<XnsAA09CB7327DFEadmin127001@144.76.35.198>
In reply to#75
On Tue, 05 Mar 2019 16:53:59 GMT, "Gene Buckle" 
<gene.buckle@bbs.retroarchive.org.remove-zcb-this> wrote:

>   To: Sjouke Burry
> Sjouke wrote:
>> From Newsgroup: alt.msdos.programmer
>> 
>> On 2-3-2019 20:23, src153 wrote:
>>> On Sat, 02 Mar 2019 20:12:40 +0100, Sjouke Burry
>>> <burrynulnulfour@ppllaanneett.nnll> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It is their reason against your stupidity.
>>>
>>> Are you joining the atheist tag team? All you pseudo intellectuals 
need
>>> is one test case of failure.
>>>
>>> Where is it?
>>>
>>>
>> Trying to fight superstition with reason.
> 
> You can't reason a person out of a position they didn't reason 
themselves
> into. ;)
> 
> g.
> 

ScarletDME - The red hot Data Management Environment
A Multi-Value database for the masses, not the classes.
http://scarlet.deltasoft.com - Get it _today_!


This page was last modified on 25 June 2013, at 15:05.



-- 
Bah, and indeed, Humbug.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#51

From"R.Wieser" <address@not.available>
Date2019-03-02 20:23 +0100
Message-ID<q5el71$1up4$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#47
src153,

> I said into the killfile you go. I didn't say when.

:-)   You're not even outwitting a 10 year old there. /Soooo/ transparent.

> I won't further litter this NG arguing with atheists

Good.  Religion and politics have no place here.

> What I see is, you don't understand it.

All what you see is what you /want/ to see.   And even though you have 
already worked with the very issue I've referred to you /still/ do not 
understand it.

> If you can prove the code wrong with a test case,

Pick any of your patch files.  Break a line after the colon and/or after the 
second value.   Moron.

Regards,
Rudy Wieser

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 2 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | alt.msdos.programmer


csiph-web