Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #213745 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2020-09-05 09:43 +0000 |
| Last post | 2020-10-20 07:41 -0500 |
| Articles | 19 on this page of 339 — 42 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.folklore.computers
Must-read computer folklore books Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2020-09-05 09:43 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books bert <bert.hutchings@btinternet.com> - 2020-09-05 04:22 -0700
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Rick Umali <rickumali@gmail.com> - 2020-09-05 13:44 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2020-09-05 16:45 +0100
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2020-09-05 16:22 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2020-09-05 18:33 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2020-09-05 21:43 +0100
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2020-09-05 20:02 +0100
Re: Must-read computer folklore books JimP <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2020-09-05 17:19 -0500
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Fred Smith <fred@thejanitor.corp> - 2020-09-06 00:15 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2020-09-05 18:32 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2020-09-07 11:27 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books usenet@only.tnx (Questor) - 2020-09-05 18:02 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2020-09-05 17:31 -0300
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-09-05 18:24 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2020-09-05 18:30 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2020-09-05 19:58 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books usenet@only.tnx (Questor) - 2020-09-05 21:49 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2020-09-08 21:10 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-09-05 17:38 -0700
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2020-09-06 08:56 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2020-09-06 01:31 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Iron Spring Software <Peter_Flass@Yahoo.com> - 2020-09-06 08:30 -0700
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2020-09-06 14:00 -0500
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-10-18 06:50 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2020-10-18 08:31 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2020-10-18 22:18 -0400
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Adam Sampson <ats@offog.org> - 2020-10-19 05:06 +0100
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Jan van den Broek <fortytwo@xs4all.nl> - 2020-09-10 22:01 +0100
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-09-10 16:12 -0700
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2020-09-10 20:53 -0700
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-09-11 06:48 -0700
Re: Must-read computer folklore books usenet@only.tnx (Questor) - 2020-09-11 19:22 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2020-09-12 12:32 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books drb@ihatespam.msu.edu (Dennis Boone) - 2020-09-11 11:03 -0500
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-18 03:11 -0500
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Niklas Karlsson <anksil@yahoo.se> - 2020-10-18 08:17 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2020-10-18 09:24 +0100
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Niklas Karlsson <anksil@yahoo.se> - 2020-10-18 08:25 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-18 03:27 -0500
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Niklas Karlsson <anksil@yahoo.se> - 2020-10-18 08:32 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2020-10-18 10:06 +0100
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-10-18 13:09 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-10-18 09:13 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Niklas Karlsson <anksil@yahoo.se> - 2020-10-18 09:26 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-10-18 13:21 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2020-10-19 02:28 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-18 19:52 -0700
Re: Must-read computer folklore books John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2020-10-19 15:02 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2020-10-19 17:46 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Niklas Karlsson <anksil@yahoo.se> - 2020-10-19 17:56 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2020-10-19 12:11 -0700
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Niklas Karlsson <anksil@yahoo.se> - 2020-10-19 19:26 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2020-10-19 12:38 -0700
Re: Must-read computer folklore books John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2020-10-20 01:01 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-10-21 22:03 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books drb@ihatespam.msu.edu (Dennis Boone) - 2020-10-21 23:54 -0500
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-22 07:03 -0500
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Niklas Karlsson <anksil@yahoo.se> - 2020-10-22 13:02 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-22 08:25 -0500
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Niklas Karlsson <anksil@yahoo.se> - 2020-10-22 13:30 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2020-10-22 14:18 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-22 09:34 -0500
Re: Must-read computer folklore books John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2020-10-22 16:14 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2020-10-22 10:18 -0700
Re: the wonders of FORTRAN, Must-read computer folklore books John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2020-10-22 17:46 +0000
Re: the wonders of FORTRAN, Must-read computer folklore books Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2020-10-22 20:47 +0100
Re: the wonders of FORTRAN Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-22 18:01 -0500
Re: the wonders of FORTRAN Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2020-10-22 23:21 +0000
Re: the wonders of FORTRAN J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-10-22 19:54 -0400
Re: the wonders of FORTRAN Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-22 20:31 -0700
Re: the wonders of FORTRAN Robert Swindells <rjs@fdy2.co.uk> - 2020-10-23 10:13 +0000
Re: the wonders of FORTRAN Hook Bandit <hookbandit@gmail.com> - 2020-10-23 13:03 +0000
Re: the wonders of FORTRAN J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-10-23 11:46 -0400
Re: the wonders of FORTRAN Andreas Eder <a_eder_muc@web.de> - 2020-10-25 10:33 +0100
Re: the wonders of FORTRAN Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-10-25 11:22 +0000
Re: the wonders of FORTRAN Niklas Karlsson <anksil@yahoo.se> - 2020-10-26 09:42 +0000
Re: the wonders of FORTRAN Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-10-26 21:55 +0000
Re: the wonders of FORTRAN, Must-read computer folklore books Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2020-10-23 10:52 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-22 12:08 -0700
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2020-10-22 18:32 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-22 13:53 -0500
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-22 13:01 -0700
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-22 16:17 -0500
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> - 2020-10-24 09:57 +0300
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2020-10-24 07:11 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-10-24 07:22 -0400
mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-24 08:59 -0500
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2020-10-24 15:04 +0100
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-10-24 11:12 -0400
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2020-10-24 15:04 +0100
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-24 10:59 -0500
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2020-10-24 17:28 +0100
Re: mathematician equation markup? Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-24 13:03 -0500
Re: mathematician equation markup? J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-10-24 14:28 -0400
Re: mathematician equation markup? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2020-10-24 19:41 +0100
Re: mathematician equation markup? Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-24 14:10 -0500
Re: mathematician equation markup? J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-10-24 17:51 -0400
Collaboration tools (was Re: mathematician equation markup?) scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2020-10-25 17:23 +0000
Re: Collaboration tools (was Re: mathematician equation markup?) Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-10-25 17:56 +0000
Re: Collaboration tools (was Re: mathematician equation markup?) Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-25 15:36 -0500
Re: Collaboration tools (was Re: mathematician equation markup?) Niklas Karlsson <anksil@yahoo.se> - 2020-10-26 09:37 +0000
Re: Collaboration tools (was Re: mathematician equation markup?) J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-10-26 08:28 -0400
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-10-24 13:18 -0400
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Niklas Karlsson <anksil@yahoo.se> - 2020-10-25 07:48 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-10-25 10:02 -0400
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-10-25 15:12 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2020-10-25 16:39 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2020-10-26 10:13 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2020-10-26 11:57 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-26 14:52 -0700
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2020-10-25 17:00 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2020-10-25 20:00 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-25 15:33 -0500
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2020-10-25 21:34 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2020-10-26 10:11 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-10-26 08:17 -0400
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-10-25 17:37 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2020-10-25 20:20 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-10-26 22:09 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Niklas Karlsson <anksil@yahoo.se> - 2020-10-27 09:31 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-27 05:59 -0500
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-27 11:14 -0700
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-27 13:53 -0500
Re: indexing, was mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2020-10-27 19:31 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2020-10-27 19:36 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-27 16:22 -0500
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2020-10-27 20:13 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2020-10-27 23:40 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-28 09:01 -0500
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2020-10-28 15:21 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-28 10:36 -0700
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-28 14:41 -0500
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-10-28 16:10 -0400
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2020-10-28 21:25 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-28 17:17 -0500
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2020-10-28 22:46 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-11-01 07:38 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2020-10-28 21:24 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-28 10:36 -0700
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-27 15:56 -0700
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2020-10-27 23:51 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-27 11:14 -0700
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-10-27 20:06 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2020-10-27 20:18 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-27 15:56 -0700
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) JimP <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2020-10-28 08:38 -0500
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-28 10:36 -0700
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) JimP <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2020-10-28 13:28 -0500
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-28 15:30 -0700
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) JimP <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2020-11-02 15:41 -0600
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-10-30 20:52 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2020-10-31 19:15 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-10-31 21:15 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2020-10-29 08:42 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2020-10-29 09:08 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-29 11:08 -0700
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-10-29 08:32 -0400
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Chris <xxx.syseng.yyy@gfsys.co.uk> - 2020-10-29 15:28 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-10-29 12:52 -0400
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Chris <xxx.syseng.yyy@gfsys.co.uk> - 2020-10-29 17:19 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-10-29 13:35 -0400
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Chris <xxx.syseng.yyy@gfsys.co.uk> - 2020-11-01 14:25 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-11-01 16:26 -0500
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) JimP <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2020-11-02 16:04 -0600
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) JimP <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2020-11-02 15:45 -0600
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-10-31 17:50 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read compu Jan van den Broek <fortytwo@xs4all.nl> - 2020-11-19 20:47 +0100
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read compu Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-11-20 20:09 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2020-10-27 20:08 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-27 16:40 -0500
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-27 15:56 -0700
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2020-10-28 04:48 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2020-10-26 02:17 -0700
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2020-10-26 10:06 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2020-10-26 10:43 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2020-10-26 11:07 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-26 07:48 -0500
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2020-10-26 18:05 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-26 14:29 -0500
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2020-10-26 19:58 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-26 15:50 -0500
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-26 14:52 -0700
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-26 07:40 -0500
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2020-10-26 14:32 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-26 14:52 -0700
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Niklas Karlsson <anksil@yahoo.se> - 2020-10-27 09:28 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-27 11:14 -0700
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Niklas Karlsson <anksil@yahoo.se> - 2020-10-27 18:29 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2020-10-27 19:36 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Niklas Karlsson <anksil@yahoo.se> - 2020-10-28 08:45 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Andy Leighton <andyl@azaal.plus.com> - 2020-10-28 05:29 -0500
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) JimP <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2020-10-28 08:45 -0500
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2020-10-28 10:06 -0500
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-10-28 11:39 -0400
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2020-10-28 16:33 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-28 10:36 -0700
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2020-10-28 19:00 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-28 14:45 -0500
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-10-28 16:07 -0400
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2020-10-30 06:19 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-10-28 16:00 -0400
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2020-10-29 08:48 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) JimP <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2020-11-02 15:48 -0600
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Joy Beeson <jbeeson@invalid.net.invalid> - 2020-11-02 19:25 -0500
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) JimP <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2020-11-03 09:50 -0600
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2020-11-02 19:34 -0500
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-11-02 19:48 -0500
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2020-11-02 20:38 -0500
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2020-11-03 09:19 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? JimP <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2020-11-03 09:56 -0600
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-11-04 22:52 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-11-05 00:42 -0500
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-11-05 06:50 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2020-11-05 01:11 -0800
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? JimP <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2020-11-05 09:46 -0600
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-11-07 21:55 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2020-11-07 23:22 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-11-05 08:37 -0600
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2020-11-05 09:51 -0500
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Richard Thiebaud <thiebauddick2@aol.com> - 2020-11-06 17:50 -0500
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2020-11-06 20:08 -0500
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-11-06 20:18 -0600
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2020-11-06 21:25 -0500
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-11-07 11:48 -0700
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2020-11-05 15:12 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? JimP <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2020-11-05 09:49 -0600
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Andy Leighton <andyl@azaal.plus.com> - 2020-11-03 03:34 -0600
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Niklas Karlsson <anksil@yahoo.se> - 2020-11-06 04:51 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2020-11-03 15:55 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-11-03 10:59 -0700
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2020-11-03 19:02 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2020-11-03 19:26 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-11-03 10:59 -0700
Scout fires. Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2020-11-03 07:49 +0000
Re: Scout fires. JimP <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2020-11-03 09:56 -0600
Re: Scout fires. Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2020-11-03 17:11 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> - 2020-10-28 14:23 -0400
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-10-28 16:08 -0400
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Fred Smith <fred@thejanitor.corp> - 2020-10-28 23:40 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2020-10-29 00:39 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-10-28 22:19 -0400
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-28 22:11 -0500
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-28 22:13 -0500
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-28 22:25 -0500
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2020-10-29 07:38 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-29 05:50 -0500
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-10-29 08:31 -0400
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-29 07:41 -0500
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-29 11:08 -0700
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Niklas Karlsson <anksil@yahoo.se> - 2020-10-29 08:33 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) JimP <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2020-11-02 15:44 -0600
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2020-10-29 06:03 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> - 2020-10-29 12:10 -0400
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-10-29 13:29 -0400
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> - 2020-10-29 13:42 -0400
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-10-29 13:55 -0400
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-29 11:08 -0700
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2020-10-29 18:51 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-29 21:37 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2020-10-29 17:44 -0500
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? JimP <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2020-11-02 15:59 -0600
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2020-11-03 06:44 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2020-11-03 07:03 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2020-11-03 10:02 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2020-11-03 13:48 +0000
Asimov, was: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? danny burstein <dannyb@panix.com> - 2020-11-03 13:56 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2020-11-03 14:05 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2020-11-03 15:27 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2020-11-03 15:57 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2020-11-03 16:44 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2020-11-03 18:37 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? JimP <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2020-11-03 09:52 -0600
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2020-11-03 18:46 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2020-11-03 19:38 -0400
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-11-03 18:48 -0500
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2020-11-04 00:59 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-11-03 20:40 -0500
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2020-11-04 18:28 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-11-04 13:36 -0500
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2020-11-04 19:37 +0000
ouchies, was: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? danny burstein <dannyb@panix.com> - 2020-11-04 20:45 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2020-11-04 23:31 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? "Kerr-Mudd,John" <notsaying@127.0.0.1> - 2020-11-04 13:35 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2020-11-04 18:28 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-29 11:08 -0700
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2020-10-29 20:43 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-10-29 16:51 -0400
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Andreas Eder <a_eder_muc@web.de> - 2020-10-30 10:54 +0100
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> - 2020-10-28 14:20 -0400
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2020-10-29 08:57 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> - 2020-10-29 12:04 -0400
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-10-29 12:49 -0400
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Niklas Karlsson <anksil@yahoo.se> - 2020-10-29 17:01 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2020-10-29 18:52 +0000
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-29 11:08 -0700
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-29 11:08 -0700
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2020-10-29 16:58 -0300
Re: tasty hand sanitizer, mathematician equation markup? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2020-10-29 18:59 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2020-10-26 11:37 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-26 07:35 -0500
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-26 14:52 -0700
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-26 17:20 -0500
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2020-10-26 17:24 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Fred Smith <fred@thejanitor.corp> - 2020-10-26 23:27 +0000
mathematician equation markup? Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-26 18:39 -0500
Re: mathematician equation markup? Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-26 18:40 -0500
Re: mathematician equation markup? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2020-10-27 06:08 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-27 11:14 -0700
Re: APL, not mathematician equation markup? John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2020-10-27 19:41 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-10-27 17:53 -0400
Re: mathematician equation markup? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2020-10-27 19:36 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2020-10-27 17:38 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-10-28 06:36 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2020-10-24 17:07 +0000
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-10-24 13:47 -0400
Re: mathematician equation markup? (was: Re: Must-read computer folklore books) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2020-10-25 00:11 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-22 12:08 -0700
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-22 12:08 -0700
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2020-10-22 16:12 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-22 12:08 -0700
Re: Must-read computer folklore books J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2020-10-22 17:23 -0400
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-22 19:35 -0700
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2020-10-23 08:37 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-22 19:35 -0700
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> - 2020-10-26 22:09 -0400
Re: Must-read computer folklore books John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2020-10-27 02:58 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-19 14:31 -0500
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-20 07:45 -0700
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2020-10-20 18:20 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2020-10-20 14:19 -0700
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2020-10-20 21:41 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2020-10-21 05:58 +0100
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2020-10-20 02:02 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2020-10-20 03:01 +0100
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Jason Evans <jsevans@mailfence.com> - 2020-10-18 14:37 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-10-19 06:05 +0000
Re: Must-read computer folklore books "Massimo M." <massimo79m@gmail.com> - 2020-10-20 01:26 -0700
Re: Must-read computer folklore books Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> - 2020-10-20 07:41 -0500
Page 17 of 17 — ← Prev page 1 … 15 16 [17]
| From | Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-10-22 12:08 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <1595768520.625085617.636917.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #214818 |
Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> wrote: > On 10/22/2020 8:02 AM, Niklas Karlsson wrote: >> Sure. If everyone in a team uses their own coding style, you'll end up >> with an abominable mess, so you do need some sort of convention. If I >> was in one where Hungarian notation was policy, I'd suck it up and use >> that - doesn't mean I have to like it. >> Niklas >> > > It seems to me that I see a trend in language syntax away from the > languages like C where newline > placement did not matter, allowing some interesting coding styles. > JavaScript is like C, but > Python is definitely not like C in that regard. > > And that makes me recall that you could trickle space characters into > FORTRAN IV program statements > anywhere you wanted them. As long as you coded between the designated > columns the only place a > space character was significant in a FORTRAN IV program was in a FORMAT > statement. You could spell > FORMAT as F O R M A T or even FORM AT if you wanted to, but once the > "Hollerith" field started then > spaces were significant. > > I always thought that was such an interesting design choice. I believe someone later said it was because they didn’t know what they were doing, which is probably why no language since has followed. > > FORTRAN IV was my first computer language, so I am always finding bits of > FORTRAN syntax design in > modern languages, particularly PowerShell. > That’s because there are large bits of Fortran in almost everything. Probably not Lisp, APL, or COBOL. -- Pete
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-10-22 17:23 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <3ut3pf9lhtb4qp0t6hr7abpc1kqcdp014q@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #214828 |
On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 12:08:54 -0700, Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> wrote: >Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> wrote: >> On 10/22/2020 8:02 AM, Niklas Karlsson wrote: >>> Sure. If everyone in a team uses their own coding style, you'll end up >>> with an abominable mess, so you do need some sort of convention. If I >>> was in one where Hungarian notation was policy, I'd suck it up and use >>> that - doesn't mean I have to like it. >>> Niklas >>> >> >> It seems to me that I see a trend in language syntax away from the >> languages like C where newline >> placement did not matter, allowing some interesting coding styles. >> JavaScript is like C, but >> Python is definitely not like C in that regard. >> >> And that makes me recall that you could trickle space characters into >> FORTRAN IV program statements >> anywhere you wanted them. As long as you coded between the designated >> columns the only place a >> space character was significant in a FORTRAN IV program was in a FORMAT >> statement. You could spell >> FORMAT as F O R M A T or even FORM AT if you wanted to, but once the >> "Hollerith" field started then >> spaces were significant. >> >> I always thought that was such an interesting design choice. > >I believe someone later said it was because they didn’t know what they were >doing, which is probably why no language since has followed. > >> >> FORTRAN IV was my first computer language, so I am always finding bits of >> FORTRAN syntax design in >> modern languages, particularly PowerShell. >> > >That’s because there are large bits of Fortran in almost everything. >Probably not Lisp, APL, or COBOL. A little bit has been added to APL but I think it's borrowed from C or the like rather than Fortran.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-10-22 19:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <1268214781.625113264.756115.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #214835 |
J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 12:08:54 -0700, Peter Flass > <peter_flass@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> wrote: >>> On 10/22/2020 8:02 AM, Niklas Karlsson wrote: >>>> Sure. If everyone in a team uses their own coding style, you'll end up >>>> with an abominable mess, so you do need some sort of convention. If I >>>> was in one where Hungarian notation was policy, I'd suck it up and use >>>> that - doesn't mean I have to like it. >>>> Niklas >>>> >>> >>> It seems to me that I see a trend in language syntax away from the >>> languages like C where newline >>> placement did not matter, allowing some interesting coding styles. >>> JavaScript is like C, but >>> Python is definitely not like C in that regard. >>> >>> And that makes me recall that you could trickle space characters into >>> FORTRAN IV program statements >>> anywhere you wanted them. As long as you coded between the designated >>> columns the only place a >>> space character was significant in a FORTRAN IV program was in a FORMAT >>> statement. You could spell >>> FORMAT as F O R M A T or even FORM AT if you wanted to, but once the >>> "Hollerith" field started then >>> spaces were significant. >>> >>> I always thought that was such an interesting design choice. >> >> I believe someone later said it was because they didn’t know what they were >> doing, which is probably why no language since has followed. >> >>> >>> FORTRAN IV was my first computer language, so I am always finding bits of >>> FORTRAN syntax design in >>> modern languages, particularly PowerShell. >>> >> >> That’s because there are large bits of Fortran in almost everything. >> Probably not Lisp, APL, or COBOL. > > A little bit has been added to APL but I think it's borrowed from C or > the like rather than Fortran. > _The Difference Engine_ by Doron Swade -- Pete
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-10-23 08:37 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hvfj1sFu9nkU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #214839 |
On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 19:35:42 -0700, Peter Flass wrote: > _The Difference Engine_ by Doron Swade I have met Doron at meetings. Which reminds me...the UK Computer Conservation Society has a website, where you can find videos of a lot of past meetings, and also back issues of their newsletter: https://computerconservationsociety.org/ -- Using UNIX since v6 (1975)... Use the BIG mirror service in the UK: http://www.mirrorservice.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-10-22 19:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <1518659568.625112936.652174.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #214835 |
J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 12:08:54 -0700, Peter Flass > <peter_flass@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> wrote: >>> On 10/22/2020 8:02 AM, Niklas Karlsson wrote: >>>> Sure. If everyone in a team uses their own coding style, you'll end up >>>> with an abominable mess, so you do need some sort of convention. If I >>>> was in one where Hungarian notation was policy, I'd suck it up and use >>>> that - doesn't mean I have to like it. >>>> Niklas >>>> >>> >>> It seems to me that I see a trend in language syntax away from the >>> languages like C where newline >>> placement did not matter, allowing some interesting coding styles. >>> JavaScript is like C, but >>> Python is definitely not like C in that regard. >>> >>> And that makes me recall that you could trickle space characters into >>> FORTRAN IV program statements >>> anywhere you wanted them. As long as you coded between the designated >>> columns the only place a >>> space character was significant in a FORTRAN IV program was in a FORMAT >>> statement. You could spell >>> FORMAT as F O R M A T or even FORM AT if you wanted to, but once the >>> "Hollerith" field started then >>> spaces were significant. >>> >>> I always thought that was such an interesting design choice. >> >> I believe someone later said it was because they didn’t know what they were >> doing, which is probably why no language since has followed. >> >>> >>> FORTRAN IV was my first computer language, so I am always finding bits of >>> FORTRAN syntax design in >>> modern languages, particularly PowerShell. >>> >> >> That’s because there are large bits of Fortran in almost everything. >> Probably not Lisp, APL, or COBOL. > > A little bit has been added to APL but I think it's borrowed from C or > the like rather than Fortran. > I forgot a wonderful coffee-table book : _ Core Memory_, by Richards Alderman. photos of computer equipment from the Z3 replica to modern hardware (almost - published in 2007) Forward by Dag Spicer. It‘s one of the few books I saved when I moved, out of 25 boxes or so, -- Pete
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-10-26 22:09 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mddft60mncl.fsf@panix5.panix.com> |
| In reply to | #214828 |
Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> writes:
> Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> wrote:
>> FORTRAN IV was my first computer language, so I am always finding bits of
>> FORTRAN syntax design in modern languages, particularly PowerShell.
> That's because there are large bits of Fortran in almost everything.
> Probably not Lisp, APL, or COBOL.
Of course, the original implementation of LISP was done in FORTRAN, and
McCarthy always used an Algol syntax ("LISP 2") when he taught. Some of the
features of LISP 1.5 were inspired by FORTRAN...
--
Rich Alderson news@alderson.users.panix.com
Audendum est, et veritas investiganda; quam etiamsi non assequamur,
omnino tamen proprius, quam nunc sumus, ad eam perveniemus.
--Galen
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-10-27 02:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <rn82bq$112e$1@gal.iecc.com> |
| In reply to | #214961 |
In article <mddft60mncl.fsf@panix5.panix.com>,
Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> wrote:
>Of course, the original implementation of LISP was done in FORTRAN, and
>McCarthy always used an Algol syntax ("LISP 2") when he taught. Some of the
>features of LISP 1.5 were inspired by FORTRAN...
McCarthy used some FORTRAN list processing routines before he wrote
Lisp, but Lisp itself was never written in FORTRAN. There was no
practical way in FORTRAN to get access to the machine word fields
needed for CAR and CDR, for example.
The M-expressions intended to be used as Lisp programs did look sort
of like FORTRAN but they eventually gave up and the S-expressions
originally used for data were (and are) used for everything.
http://jmc.stanford.edu/articles/lisp/lisp.pdf
--
Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-10-19 14:31 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <rmkpj3$ub0$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #214794 |
On 10/19/2020 2:11 PM, Quadibloc wrote: > On Monday, October 19, 2020 at 10:56:51 AM UTC-7, Niklas Karlsson wrote: >> Ah yes - from my quotes file: >> Hungarian Notation is the tactical nuclear weapon of source code >> obfuscation techniques. > > And I always thought Hungarian notation was a good thing. > After all, it's just a logical successor to I-N for integer and A-H, O-Z and $ > for real. > John Savard > At least the compiler paid attention to that form of Hungarian notation. Amazing that we coded so much FORTRAN IV without string type variables.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-10-20 07:45 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <585905954.624897744.841786.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #214796 |
Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> wrote: > On 10/19/2020 2:11 PM, Quadibloc wrote: >> On Monday, October 19, 2020 at 10:56:51 AM UTC-7, Niklas Karlsson wrote: >>> Ah yes - from my quotes file: >>> Hungarian Notation is the tactical nuclear weapon of source code >>> obfuscation techniques. >> >> And I always thought Hungarian notation was a good thing. >> After all, it's just a logical successor to I-N for integer and A-H, O-Z and $ >> for real. >> John Savard >> > > At least the compiler paid attention to that form of Hungarian notation. > > Amazing that we coded so much FORTRAN IV without string type variables. > Ah yes, the old “20A1” format and such. -- Pete
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-10-20 18:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <rmn9p4$v5r$1@newsreader4.netcologne.de> |
| In reply to | #214796 |
Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> schrieb: > On 10/19/2020 2:11 PM, Quadibloc wrote: >> On Monday, October 19, 2020 at 10:56:51 AM UTC-7, Niklas Karlsson wrote: >>> Ah yes - from my quotes file: >>> Hungarian Notation is the tactical nuclear weapon of source code >>> obfuscation techniques. >> >> And I always thought Hungarian notation was a good thing. >> After all, it's just a logical successor to I-N for integer and A-H, O-Z and $ >> for real. >> John Savard >> > > At least the compiler paid attention to that form of Hungarian notation. > > Amazing that we coded so much FORTRAN IV without string type variables. One amazing thing that Kernighan describes in his Memoir was that he wrote a version of runoff for his PhD thesis in pre-F77 FORTRAN, and used it to print it out. Apparently, his was the first thesis at Stanford printed via a computer. That guy is some programmer...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-10-20 14:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <534877415.624910992.455980.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #214806 |
Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> wrote: > Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> schrieb: >> On 10/19/2020 2:11 PM, Quadibloc wrote: >>> On Monday, October 19, 2020 at 10:56:51 AM UTC-7, Niklas Karlsson wrote: >>>> Ah yes - from my quotes file: >>>> Hungarian Notation is the tactical nuclear weapon of source code >>>> obfuscation techniques. >>> >>> And I always thought Hungarian notation was a good thing. >>> After all, it's just a logical successor to I-N for integer and A-H, O-Z and $ >>> for real. >>> John Savard >>> >> >> At least the compiler paid attention to that form of Hungarian notation. >> >> Amazing that we coded so much FORTRAN IV without string type variables. > > One amazing thing that Kernighan describes in his Memoir was that > he wrote a version of runoff for his PhD thesis in pre-F77 FORTRAN, > and used it to print it out. Apparently, his was the first thesis > at Stanford printed via a computer. > > That guy is some programmer... > Yeah. It sounds an “oh, by the way” thing he just tossed off as a side project. Did he say what printer he used? -- Pete
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-10-20 21:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <rmnli3$7q4$1@newsreader4.netcologne.de> |
| In reply to | #214808 |
Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> schrieb: > Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> wrote: >> Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> schrieb: >>> On 10/19/2020 2:11 PM, Quadibloc wrote: >>>> On Monday, October 19, 2020 at 10:56:51 AM UTC-7, Niklas Karlsson wrote: >>>>> Ah yes - from my quotes file: >>>>> Hungarian Notation is the tactical nuclear weapon of source code >>>>> obfuscation techniques. >>>> >>>> And I always thought Hungarian notation was a good thing. >>>> After all, it's just a logical successor to I-N for integer and A-H, O-Z and $ >>>> for real. >>>> John Savard >>>> >>> >>> At least the compiler paid attention to that form of Hungarian notation. >>> >>> Amazing that we coded so much FORTRAN IV without string type variables. >> >> One amazing thing that Kernighan describes in his Memoir was that >> he wrote a version of runoff for his PhD thesis in pre-F77 FORTRAN, >> and used it to print it out. Apparently, his was the first thesis >> at Stanford printed via a computer. >> >> That guy is some programmer... >> > > Yeah. It sounds an “oh, by the way” thing he just tossed off as a side > project. Did he say what printer he used? His Runoff version (1000 cards of Fortran) translated everything from all caps to small letters and then automatically capitalized the first letter of each sentence. It was then printed on an IBM 1403, which could do both upper and lower case. 1000 punched cards for the Runoff version, 5000 punched cards for the thesis itself (with a few mathematical signs pencilled in). That was in 1969. It's hard to believe the advance over the next two decades. Exactly 20 years later, I was using LaTeX for reports about student experiments I had done, printed out on a laser printer on a mainframe. A few years later, PCs were powerful enough, and ink jet printers had arrived.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-10-21 05:58 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <20201021055814.abb4b7f3dda5c4d1e8f09385@eircom.net> |
| In reply to | #214809 |
On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 21:41:23 -0000 (UTC) Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> wrote: > That was in 1969. It's hard to believe the advance over the > next two decades. Exactly 20 years later, I was using LaTeX for > reports about student experiments I had done, printed out on a > laser printer on a mainframe. A few years later, PCs were powerful > enough, and ink jet printers had arrived. Things like PCs were already powerful enough to typeset a 1000 page reference book and proof it on an inkjet (Epson SQ<mumble>) before you were using LaTeX and a laser printer (I was doing this in 1986). The machine running sqtroff was an Altos 80286 based XENIX box - an 80286 based PC ran the PostScript emulator (goscript) driving the Epson with ESC/P codes. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith | Directable Mirror Arrays C:\>WIN | A better way to focus the sun The computer obeys and wins. | licences available see You lose and Bill collects. | http://www.sohara.org/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-10-20 02:02 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <rmlggi01f8r@news2.newsguy.com> |
| In reply to | #214794 |
On 2020-10-19, Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> wrote: > On Monday, October 19, 2020 at 10:56:51 AM UTC-7, Niklas Karlsson wrote: > >> Ah yes - from my quotes file: >> >> Hungarian Notation is the tactical nuclear weapon of source code >> obfuscation techniques. > > And I always thought Hungarian notation was a good thing. > > After all, it's just a logical successor to I-N for integer > and A-H, O-Z and $ for real. Take it one step farther and you have COBOL's reserved words. -- /~\ Charlie Gibbs | "Some of you may die, \ / <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> | but it's sacrifice X I'm really at ac.dekanfrus | I'm willing to make." / \ if you read it the right way. | -- Lord Farquaad (Shrek)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-10-20 03:01 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <20201020030144.a54da17baba1bc0fe3b8c7af@eircom.net> |
| In reply to | #214794 |
On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 12:11:07 -0700 (PDT) Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> wrote: > On Monday, October 19, 2020 at 10:56:51 AM UTC-7, Niklas Karlsson wrote: > > > Ah yes - from my quotes file: > > > > Hungarian Notation is the tactical nuclear weapon of source code > > obfuscation techniques. > > And I always thought Hungarian notation was a good thing. Not in my book, names should say what they mean not how they work. It also doesn't sit too well with OO design, and the modern variant of wearing design pattern labels in the variable names is just horrendous. > After all, it's just a logical successor to I-N for integer and A-H, O-Z > and $ for real. That was just a convention to allow leaving out declarations. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith | Directable Mirror Arrays C:\>WIN | A better way to focus the sun The computer obeys and wins. | licences available see You lose and Bill collects. | http://www.sohara.org/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jason Evans <jsevans@mailfence.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-10-18 14:37 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <rmhjv8$26csb$2@news.theuse.net> |
| In reply to | #213745 |
On Sat, 5 Sep 2020 09:43:37 -0000 (UTC), Thomas Koenig wrote: > What are the must-read computer folklore books? Managing Usenet by David Lawrence Check it out from the Open Library: https://openlibrary.org/works/OL16456330W/Managing_Usenet
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-10-19 06:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnroqb4c.1hpq.grahn+nntp@frailea.sa.invalid> |
| In reply to | #214784 |
On Sun, 2020-10-18, Jason Evans wrote: > On Sat, 5 Sep 2020 09:43:37 -0000 (UTC), Thomas Koenig wrote: > >> What are the must-read computer folklore books? > > Managing Usenet by David Lawrence > Check it out from the Open Library: > https://openlibrary.org/works/OL16456330W/Managing_Usenet It says by Henry Spencer and David Lawrence. Spencer's name pops up a lot, connected to various things. /Jorgen -- // Jorgen Grahn <grahn@ Oo o. . . \X/ snipabacken.se> O o .
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Massimo M." <massimo79m@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-10-20 01:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e9373f9e-cd37-4b90-8bbb-ebd2f9e21292n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #213745 |
I don't know if it exists in english, but "P101. Quando l'Italia inventò il personal computer" the history of the Olivetti programma 101.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dallas <dallas@texas.usa> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-10-20 07:41 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <rmmlun$qmd$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #213745 |
On 9/5/2020 4:43 AM, Thomas Koenig wrote: > What are the must-read computer folklore books? "GO TO" by Steve Lohr "NERDS 2.0.1" by Stephen Segaller "The Home Computer Revolution" by Ted Nelson
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 17 of 17 — ← Prev page 1 … 15 16 [17]
Back to top | Article view | alt.folklore.computers
csiph-web