Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #165246 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Kerr Mudd-John" <admin@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-06-15 19:15 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-06-15 19:15 +0100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to alt.folklore.computers
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: the FORTH computer language "Kerr Mudd-John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2016-06-15 19:15 +0100
| From | "Kerr Mudd-John" <admin@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-15 19:15 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: the FORTH computer language |
| Message-ID | <op.yi32b5b9msr2db@dell3100.dlink.com> |
On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 23:16:26 +0100, David Hume <David.Hume@example.com> wrote: > "gareth" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> writes: > >> "gareth" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> wrote in message >> news:n0ah0n$1rk$1@dont-email.me... >>> ISTR a PDP-11 version where DUP resolved to MOV (SP), -(SP) >> >> Mea Culpa and a senior moment, I'd forgotten about the Return Stack and >> the >> Variable Stack of FORTH >> >> Change the above to read MOV (R0), -(R0) > > It doesn't really matter. I think we are talking at cross purposes. gareth talks at cross-purposes all the time. It's a troll thing. -- Bah, and indeed, Humbug
Back to top | Article view | alt.folklore.computers
csiph-web