Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #164446 > unrolled thread
| Started by | RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-06-04 00:02 +0000 |
| Last post | 2016-06-03 17:38 -0700 |
| Articles | 8 — 7 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.folklore.computers
[CM] the ECHO IV home computer, 50 years later RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2016-06-04 00:02 +0000
Re: [CM] the ECHO IV home computer, 50 years later Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2016-06-03 17:30 -0700
Re: [CM] the ECHO IV home computer, 50 years later Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-06-03 22:18 -0400
Re: [CM] the ECHO IV home computer, 50 years later "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-04 11:06 +0100
Re: [CM] the ECHO IV home computer, 50 years later Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-06-04 09:39 -0400
Re: [CM] the ECHO IV home computer, 50 years later "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2016-06-11 10:45 -0500
Re: [CM] the ECHO IV home computer, 50 years later hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-06-11 13:19 -0700
Re: [CM] the ECHO IV home computer, 50 years later Al Kossow <aek@bitsavers.org> - 2016-06-03 17:38 -0700
| From | RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-04 00:02 +0000 |
| Subject | [CM] the ECHO IV home computer, 50 years later |
| Message-ID | <nit5ra$h6h$1@solani.org> |
From the «home before it wass cool» department: Title: The ECHO IV home computer: 50 years later Author: Thom Holwerda Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2016 16:41:21 -0400 Link: http://osnews.com/story/29239/The_ECHO_IV_home_computer_50_years_later This year we celebrate the 50th anniversary of a home computer built and operated more than a decade before 'official' home computers arrived on the scene. Yes, before the 'trinity' of the Apple II, the Commodore PET and the Radio Shack TRS-80 - all introduced in 1977 - Jim Sutherland, a quiet engineer and family man in Pittsburgh, was building a computer system on his own for his family. Sutherland configured this new computer system to control many aspects of his home with his wife and children as active users. It truly was a home computer - that is, the house itself was part of the computer and its use was integrated into the family's daily routines. "It is not easy to be a pioneer - but oh, it is fascinating! I would not trade one moment, even the worst moment, for all the riches in the world." (Elizabeth Blackwell). -- Posting to comp.misc, sci.misc, and misc.news.internet.discuss
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-03 17:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8859b72b-e5bd-4626-a4c8-29e769d73d89@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #164446 |
This did not ring a bell; I guess I must have missed the April, 1968 issue of _Popular Mechanics_, which had an article about that computer. John Savard
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-03 22:18 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <alpine.LNX.2.02.1606032214200.7954@darkstar.example.org> |
| In reply to | #164447 |
On Fri, 3 Jun 2016, Quadibloc wrote: > This did not ring a bell; I guess I must have missed the April, 1968 > issue of _Popular Mechanics_, which had an article about that computer. > And the tone is wrong. People wanted their own computers, and some even got them. There was the ACS (Amateur Computer Society) that had some members. Some built their own, others scrounged, and I guess some might have had a PDP-8. I think the thrust was having your own computer, for many that goal was hard enough, so "using it" came second. So when microprocessors came along, many kind of abandoned their works in progress, since suddenly a computer could be had cheaper, simpler and smaller. And suddenly your home computer was something other people had, you didn't have to write the operating system and BASIC or whatever for your unique computer. But the tone of the article is also off, since it hypes 1977, when it should be 1975 and the Altair 8800, or 1974 and the 8008 based Micro-8, or even the Scelbi 8008 computer. Things moved a lot faster in retrospect than they did at the time. Michael
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-04 11:06 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <niu97u$5s8$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #164452 |
"Michael Black" <et472@ncf.ca> wrote in message news:alpine.LNX.2.02.1606032214200.7954@darkstar.example.org... > I think the thrust was having your own computer, for many that goal was > hard enough, so "using it" came second. An appropriate attitude for such an excellent complex machine in its own right!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-04 09:39 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <alpine.LNX.2.02.1606040936490.8682@darkstar.example.org> |
| In reply to | #164462 |
On Sat, 4 Jun 2016, gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339 wrote: > "Michael Black" <et472@ncf.ca> wrote in message > news:alpine.LNX.2.02.1606032214200.7954@darkstar.example.org... >> I think the thrust was having your own computer, for many that goal was >> hard enough, so "using it" came second. > > An appropriate attitude for such an excellent complex machine in its own > right! > I remember reading an article (after the fact) in Popular Electronics. Somewhere around 1964, there had been a hurricane somewhere, and a computer written off for insurance purposes. And a school ended up with the remains. I don't know if they ever got it going but the potential of having their own computer at the time must have seemed great. But they had to deal not only with water damage (I think salt water damage too), but if I recall properly, the computer had been hacked apart to move it to the new location, so they had to splice endless wires and such to get it operational. But they probably learned a lot. Michael
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-11 10:45 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <njhbnb$e8v$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #164469 |
"Michael Black" <et472@ncf.ca> wrote in message news:alpine.LNX.2.02.1606040936490.8682@darkstar.example.org... > On Sat, 4 Jun 2016, gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339 wrote: > >> "Michael Black" <et472@ncf.ca> wrote in message >> news:alpine.LNX.2.02.1606032214200.7954@darkstar.example.org... >>> I think the thrust was having your own computer, for many that goal >>> was >>> hard enough, so "using it" came second. >> >> An appropriate attitude for such an excellent complex machine in its own >> right! >> > I remember reading an article (after the fact) in Popular Electronics. > Somewhere around 1964, there had been a hurricane somewhere, and a > computer written off for insurance purposes. And a school ended up with > the remains. I don't know if they ever got it going but the potential of > having their own computer at the time must have seemed great. But they > had to deal not only with water damage (I think salt water damage too), > but if I recall properly, the computer had been hacked apart to move it to > the new location, so they had to splice endless wires and such to get it > operational. But they probably learned a lot. > "Experience is what you get... when you don't get what you want." When it becomes a "DIY" project, you learn of lot... of necessity. -- numerist at aquaporin4 dot com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-11 13:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <37539f25-72a3-4d51-9691-ba932b64d2ae@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #164469 |
On Saturday, June 4, 2016 at 9:38:35 AM UTC-4, Michael Black wrote: > I remember reading an article (after the fact) in Popular Electronics. > Somewhere around 1964, there had been a hurricane somewhere, and a > computer written off for insurance purposes. And a school ended up with > the remains. I don't know if they ever got it going but the potential of > having their own computer at the time must have seemed great. But they > had to deal not only with water damage (I think salt water damage too), > but if I recall properly, the computer had been hacked apart to move it to > the new location, so they had to splice endless wires and such to get it > operational. But they probably learned a lot. Sometimes a business would donate an obsolete computer to a school. Nice publicity and tax deduction. I knew of one high school that had a 1401 long after S/360 and even S/370 replaced most of them. Perhaps some company donated it. But I heard IBM had a deep educational discount available for those old machines. Again, that was nice publicity, plus it encouraged young people to get into programming, for which there was a big demand.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Al Kossow <aek@bitsavers.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-03 17:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <nit7te$a2k$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #164446 |
On 6/3/16 5:02 PM, RS Wood wrote: > From the «home before it wass cool» department: > Title: The ECHO IV home computer: 50 years later > Author: Thom Holwerda > Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2016 16:41:21 -0400 > Link: http://osnews.com/story/29239/The_ECHO_IV_home_computer_50_years_later > This is actually a pointer to a CHM blog post written by Dag Spicer http://www.computerhistory.org/atchm/the-echo-iv-home-computer-50-years-later/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | alt.folklore.computers
csiph-web